Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Management Case Studies
Project Management Case Studies
Dana Barnett
In this paper, I will go over three different case files and breakdown the problems that were
presented and my own personal view on how they can improve. The three different case studies
are “A Rush to Failure”, “The Estimating Problem,” and “Fargo Foods.” Using what I’ve learned
about project management hopefully I can apply useful suggestions to these case studies and see
potential solutions on how these companies can improve their project management.
Fargo Foods
The first Case Study I’ll go over is Fargo Foods. Fargo Foods is an international food
manufacturer that has had recently started building new factories with some major modifications.
These modifications are aimed at reducing needed labor for all their canning factories.
Unfortunately after implementing a project management matrix to aid the new projects, it has
become obvious that the matrix was not operating efficiently or effectively. The main problem
that became apparent to me was the executives at Fargo Foods don’t understand project
management and how much work is needed for it to be effective. It said in the case study that the
executive’s assumed that rough estimates were detailed estimates and rough schedules were
detailed schedules. This can cause a huge problem because If employees and project managers
alike don’t understand what the exact expectations are no one can do anything right. It seems like
these executives need help understanding the difference between knowing what they want in
their head and getting down exactly what they want on paper. Another problem that comes with
this lack of in-depth planning is that the project managers aren’t let in on the planning of the
project. This leads to unmotivated project managers who aren’t dedicated to their projects
because they don’t have a stake in them. The best solution I have for this case study is for the
executives to either get educated about project management or let someone else do their planning
for them. So many issues arise whenever clear and concise plans aren’t thought up and these
leave project managers uninspired, line workers confused and projects unfinished. Obviously,
It’s interesting to note the similarities in the issues between this case study and the last one. The
Fargo Foods case study was about the executives hurting project management because they did
not understand project planning. The Estimating Problem case study showed a similar problem,
although this time it wasn’t the executives that made a planning issue, it was the estimating
group that ended up hurting the project. In the Estimating Problem, Barbra is a project manager
that was just assigned a project but discovers that its schedule is unrealistic in the time it would
be able to be finished. The group used the three-point estimate when it came to the project and
decided that it would take 12 weeks to finish a critical part of the project whereas Barbra knew
from experience it would take 14 weeks. Because the estimating group hadn’t understood the
project's complexity and hadn’t triangulated the data they hadn’t estimated enough tough for the
project. One word of advice I would add to this case study is always asking for experts advice. In
this case, study the group that estimated the time said in an optimistic scenario that the project
would only take 4 weeks. Barabra’s experience on past projects told her that the 4-week estimate
could not apply to the project she had at hand, and only applied to projects much simpler than the
one at hand. A quick conversation with a professional would have helped the estimating team
realize the complexity of the project and would’ve come to a better estimate. Also, the range of
the estimation seemed way off as well, a project that can be done between a range of 4 to 16
weeks doesn't seem to be a well-understood project in the first place. This case study has taught
me that you need to fully understand a project before you can estimate how long it will take to be
done.
Rush to Failure
The next case study is Rush to Failure. In this case study, the Canadian Aeronautics
Administration was asked to make two complex robotic arms to do repairs on the international
space station. Because of a focus on finishing the project as soon as possible the project was
finished in 6 years instead of the usual 10. This shortened schedule didn’t give the appropriate
time and resources to test and fix potential problems despite the many problems that came up
during the project. Unfortunately during its first use, the robotic arms failed in exactly the same
way that they had problems during development. The advice I’d give to this case study is that a
working project is better than any nonworking project that is done early. Using something that
isn’t up to the task only wastes resources as problems arise with either the project or what the
project is supposed to help. In this case, it’s better to take years and give a working product
Conclusion
It’s always easier as an outsider to spot problems and prescribe solutions, knowing that I want to
be self-aware enough to find these kinds of issues and their solutions during any project I run
into. One of the key takeaways I learned from these case studies was you have to communicate
with professionals. In the Fargo Foods case study, the executives didn’t know how to effectively
plan a project and their company suffered for it. And in the Estimating Problem case study, the
team that estimated the schedule of the project could’ve given a more accurate estimation had
they communicated with a professional. Both of these issues could have been solved by talking
to professionals who knew what they were doing. The other takeaway I got from this is there’s
no point in rushing a project if that means it’s going to fail. Hopefully, I’ll be able to remember
these takeaways and be able to spot and fix these issues if they ever come up while I’m
managing a project.