You are on page 1of 3

Juhi Shah

Professor Winogora

Phi 205-020-Moral Choice

11 July 2019

Homework Assignment

1. How do your feelings affect moral judgments you make? Do the determine your

judgments? Do they inform them? If so, how?

My feelings most of the times do not directly the moral decisions I have to make.

For example, if I have to make a decision that is totally against my feelings but is the

right decision to make when thinking morally, I will continue to make the choice that is

morally right but feel at unease while performing the decision. Most of the time, my

decisions are not determined by my feelings, as I take my time to think about my

decisions, and how they will be affecting the people who are around me, and what the

results can be over a long period of time. Sometimes however my feelings may become

so overwhelming and powerful that may cause me to make a decision which may not be

morally right and regret it later, when the emotion is gone. For example, I am not against

abortion it should be woman’s choice although emotionally I hesitate to kill an unborn

child, but if a women’s health is on urge, it would be important for me to keep in mind

that my emotional feelings will not be able to change my moral judgment.

2. If you travelled the world and saw that cultures differ dramatically in their moral

judgement, would you conclude from this evidence that cultural relativism was true? why

or why not?

This study source was downloaded by 100000850639825 from CourseHero.com on 08-09-2022 13:46:19 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/52510490/Juhi-Shah-PHI-205-HW-2docx/
From this scenario it can concluded that cultural relativism was true. If culture

differs dramatically it can affect the persons judgement because it might be right for one

culture to follow some ritual, but for someone else it can be morally and culturally wrong

thing to do. “Many Hindus, who form about 80 percent of India’s population, consider

cows sacred”. (Schultz). Kai Schultz in his article “Murders of Religious Minorities” in

New York times explains how cultural relativism plays a great role in some parts of the

nation. As Schultz mentioned cow is a sacred animal according to Hindu religion, but for

other religions it is morally and culturally right to eat cow meat and kill cows. This

initially led to a fight between two culturally different communities. Therefore, by

travelling the world and noticing other people’s moral values is dramatically different,

can give rise to cultural relativism.

3. Is it immoral to believe a claim without evidence? Why or why not?

I believe that it is always immoral to believe a claim without seeing the evidence,

and only relying on how emotional the claim is. Such claims sometimes can affect the

lives of people who may be directly or indirectly related to these claims. For example, I

believe that false accusations and rumors are great examples of what claims without

evidence can turn into, and such things can easily spread negativity or hate, or make

victims lose their jobs, reputation or even lives. Also, not believing claims without

evidence forces people to research and think more and try to find evidence to back the

claim up or deny it, which is a more moral thing than just believing a claim without

evidence

This study source was downloaded by 100000850639825 from CourseHero.com on 08-09-2022 13:46:19 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/52510490/Juhi-Shah-PHI-205-HW-2docx/
Work Cited

Schultz, Kai. “Murders of Religious Minorities in India Go Unpunished, Report Finds.”


The New York times, 18 February 2019, https:// www.nytimes.com /2019/02/18/
world/asia/india-cow-religious-attacks.html

This study source was downloaded by 100000850639825 from CourseHero.com on 08-09-2022 13:46:19 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/52510490/Juhi-Shah-PHI-205-HW-2docx/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

You might also like