Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3
Wei Qian, Yuguang Bai and Dong Wang
based on the aboved scale. The model was Table 3 Mode comparison
manufactured by steel skeleton and carbon fiber
skin. The principal direction of carbon fiber was Initial Theoretical Final
Model parameter
still 45°. Structure parameters were computed model scale design
through optimal process. A difficult problem Weight (g) 1864 11287
should be resolved: after total weight 11kg of
the model was established, no matter how much Barycenter X(mm) 567 560
carbon fiber skin was increased, frequency ratio Barycenter Y(mm) 330 320
cannot be reached. In order to satisfy this st
demand, geometry shape change or wing 1 order bending 17.2
9.6 14.4
thickness increase should be chosen. Finally, we (Hz)
st
decided to use the maximum frequency state 1 order torsion 68.5
38.2 63.0
related to airfoil shape and weight, so the (Hz)
nd
designed model was not satisfy the demand of 2 order bending 86.7
48.3 81.0
frequency ratio. FEM model was shown in Fig.7; (Hz)
the first four computational modes were shown nd
2 order torsion 164.2
in Fig.8; and comparison between basic model 91.5 145.6
(Hz)
and designed model was shown in Table 3.
5
Wei Qian, Yuguang Bai and Dong Wang
Reference
[1] E. CARSON YATES. AGARD standard
aeroelastic configurations for dynamic
response candidate configuration I.-wing
445.6 [R]. NASA Technical Memorandum
100492, August 1987.
[2] Vasily V. Chedrik*, Fanil Z. Ishmuratov†,
Mikhail Ch. Zichenkov‡, Yury A. Azarov.
Optimization Approach to Design of
AeroelasticDynamically-Scaled Models of
Aircraft [C], Proceedings of 10th
AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis
and Optimization Conference, 2004. AIAA
2004-4642.
[3] Elizabeth M. Lee-Rausch, John T. Batina.
Fig.15 Experimental modes from LMS Test.lib Calculation of AGARD Wing 445.6 Flutter
system. using Navier-Stokes aerodynamics [C].
Proceedings of AIAA 11th Applied
Table 4 gives comparison between the Aerodynamics Conference, California.
experimental and computed results of frequency 1993. AIAA paper No. 93-3476.
of the wing model. Deviation was less than 5%. [4] Daniella E. Raveh. Aircraft aeroelastic
It can be found that the present design method analysis and design using CFD-based
can satisfy the design requirement. unsteady loads [C]. Proceedings of the 41st
AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures,
Table 4 Comparison of the experimental and
Structural Dynamics, and Materials
computed results of the wing model.
Conference and Exhibit, Atlanta: American
Results Computed Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
Mode
of GVT results 2000. AIAA-00-1325.
st
1 bending (Hz) 14.2 14.4 [5] Robert M. Bennett. An overview of recent
st
1 torsion (Hz) 62.3 63.0 developments in computational
nd
2 bending (Hz) 78.5 81.0 aeroelasticity [C]. AIAA-98-2421.
nd
2 torsion (Hz) 141.7 145.6
Contact Author Email Address
5. Conclusions Name: Mr. Wei Qian, Professor
A reference structure-similarity model of Address: 2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District,
AGARD WING 445.6 was presented in this School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Dalian
paper. It generally provided consistent basic
University of Technology Dalian 116023, China
modes and flutter characteristic compared to the
original structure. Such model can satisfy the E-mail: sy_qianwei@139.com
demand of wind tunnel in China. Tel: 86 (0) 13709889805 (mobile)
Through an encouraging GVT, flutter model 86 411 84709105 (office)
entity was consistent with FEM simulation
6
DESIGN, MANUFACTURE AND FREQUENCY EXPERIMENT OF A NOVEL
FLUTTER MODEL FOR AGARD WING 445.6 WITH STRUCTURE-SIMILARITY
Copyright Statement
The authors confirm that they, and/or their company or
organization, hold copyright on all of the original material
included in this paper. The authors also confirm that they
have obtained permission, from the copyright holder of
any third party material included in this paper, to publish
it as part of their paper. The authors confirm that they
give permission, or have obtained permission from the
copyright holder of this paper, for the publication and
distribution of this paper as part of the ICAS proceedings
or as individual off-prints from the proceedings.