Professional Documents
Culture Documents
pyramid
Carroll’s CSR pyramid: this article provides a practical explanation of Carroll’s CSR
pyramid. After reading, you’ll understand the basics of this powerful strategy tool.
Carroll’s CSR pyramid explained
Carroll’s CSR pyramid is a framework that explains how and why organisations
should take social responsibility. The pyramid was developed by Archie B.
Carroll and highlights the four most important types of responsibility of organisations.
These are:
Economic responsibility
Legal responsibility
Ethical responsibility
Philanthropic responsibility
The pyramid’s base is profit. This foundation is necessary for a company to meet all
laws and regulations, as well as the demands of shareholders.
Before a company can and should then take its philanthropic responsibility or
discretionary responsibility, it must also meet its ethical responsibilities.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been a popular phrase since the 1950s.
The basis of the modern definition of CSR is rooted in the work that led to Archie
Carroll’s pyramid. This four-part definition was originally published by Archie B.
Carroll in 1979: CSR refers to a business’s behaviour, that it’s economically
profitable, complies with the law, is ethical, and is socially supportive.
Profitability and compliance with the law are the most important conditions for
corporate social responsibility and when discussing the company’s ethics, and the
level to which it supports the society it’s part of with money, time, and talent.
In 1991, he expanded on this definition using a pyramid. The goal of the pyramid was
to illustrate the building-block character of the four-part framework. This geometric
shape was chosen because it’s both simple and timeless.
The economic responsibility was placed at the pyramid’s foundation, since it’s a
fundamental requirement to survive in business.
As with a building’s foundation that keeps the entire structure up, durable profitability
helps to support the expectations of society, shareholders, and other stakeholders.
The relevance of Carroll’s pyramid
Almost 30 years after the pyramid was developed, it’s as important as ever. The
design is still regularly quoted, changed, discussed, and criticised by business leaders,
politicians, scholars, and social pundits.
The importance of the pyramid will continue to exist because the methods explained
in it are understood by all organisations and can be used to reach the top of the
pyramid.
The four different types of responsibilities organisations must take as shown in the
pyramid are:
Economic responsibility in Carroll’s CSR pyramid
The economic responsibility of companies is about producing goods and services that
society needs and to make a profit on them.
The legal responsibility of companies is about complying with the minimum rules that
have been set. Organisations are expected to operate and function within those rules.
The basic rules consist of laws and regulations that represent society’s views of
codified ethics.
They determine how organisations can conduct their business practices in a fair
manner, as defined by legislators on national, regional, and local level. Legal
responsibility in CSR is:
The difference between legal and ethical expectations can be difficult to determine.
Obviously, laws are based on ethical premises, but ethics goes beyond that.