Brigid Brophy argues that humans have a moral obligation to respect animals' rights and to behave decently towards them. She asserts that the current relationship between humans and animals is one of unremitting exploitation, as humans enjoy animals' work, eat them, wear them, sacrifice them to science and experiments, and rarely leave wild animals alive in their natural habitats. While acknowledging some uses of animals for economic and medical purposes, Brophy believes we should recognize that animals have natural rights as living beings with a will to live freely.
Brigid Brophy argues that humans have a moral obligation to respect animals' rights and to behave decently towards them. She asserts that the current relationship between humans and animals is one of unremitting exploitation, as humans enjoy animals' work, eat them, wear them, sacrifice them to science and experiments, and rarely leave wild animals alive in their natural habitats. While acknowledging some uses of animals for economic and medical purposes, Brophy believes we should recognize that animals have natural rights as living beings with a will to live freely.
Brigid Brophy argues that humans have a moral obligation to respect animals' rights and to behave decently towards them. She asserts that the current relationship between humans and animals is one of unremitting exploitation, as humans enjoy animals' work, eat them, wear them, sacrifice them to science and experiments, and rarely leave wild animals alive in their natural habitats. While acknowledging some uses of animals for economic and medical purposes, Brophy believes we should recognize that animals have natural rights as living beings with a will to live freely.
many complex forms and sees art as an extension of that force.
Brophy argues- the responsibility of human
beings is to behave decently towards the animals.
She asserts that out relationship to animal is
1929 -1995 one of unremitting exploitation.
We are under moral obligation to respect
animals rights. Some people say that they exploit or violate the animal rights because that is their hobby - people exploit fish which is not harmful for them - kill the fish for amusement of or fishing is their hobby. According to Brophy, our relationship to animal is exploitation - enjoy their work, eat them, wear them, serve our superstitions, sacrifice them to out god, and sacrifice them to science and experiments. People rarely leave wild animals alive, when they do, do not leave them wild, put in zoo or display in circus. Doing these activities, people are violating their moral aesthetic sense. She says - Animals also have their natural rights - why human being forget that? We are aware of human rights but forget to respect animal rights. CONCLUDING POINTS
She argues that animals can be used for
economical growth with maintaining basic rights of animals. She was vegetarian - and said we have no right to kill animals, meat is not essential for human life (she is without meat for ten years) and she is very healthy. But she argues that to fulfill the minimum obligations (basic needs), people have right to kill animals. Sometimes scientific and medical experiments are important to make life easier, better and longer. Genuine and painful clash is on the subject of vivisection (practice of operation on live animals for the purpose of experiments.) CONCLUSION Animals should have rights because they are living beings with the right to live freely as long as they have the will to. THANK YOU