Instructions for using FM-RS-09-02 and FM-RS-12-03:

1. Save it as a different/new file to prevent replacing the original document form.

2. After choosing between Presentation or Readership, please do not click on either again as it
will change the Criteria for Evaluation. Even if all fields are read-only after signing, the rule still
applies.
3. Tip: During saving the file, entitle it with either Presentation or Readership for reference.
 DISSERTATION/THESIS/RESEARCH PRACTICUM Document No.: FM-RS-09-02
Effective Date: May 5, 2020
PROPOSAL ORAL EXAMINATION GRADING
Supersedes: FM-RS-09-01
SHEET Page: 1 of 1

NAME OF STUDENT/S Program of Study

TITLE OF DISSERTATION/THESIS/ RESEARCH PRACTICUM

Date of Examination NAME OF EVALUATOR (Advisor/Panel Member)


✔ PRESENTATION  READERSHIP

Equivalent
Criteria for Evaluation Grade
Points
I. Title – Proposed title is appropriate to the study. 5
II. Introduction
5
A. Sufficient background about the study is given.
B. The significance of the study is clearly explained. 5
C. The objectives of the study are clearly stated. 5
D. The scope and limitations of the study is well-defined. 5
III. Review of Related Literature – The review includes sufficient information on previous studies
15
related to the one being proposed.
IV. Methodology – The methods proposed show promise of fulfilling the objectives of the study. 20
V. Oral Presentation
10
A. The student displayed thorough mastery of the study being proposed.
B. The student answered all questions raised by the examination committee well. 10
C. The student presented well-prepared visuals to facilitate the discussion of the study. 10
D. The student was able to communicate proposal to the examination committee effectively. 10
TOTAL 0
*Passing score is 70%
Please check the appropriate blank:
I hereby recommend the approval of the proposal as presented. (No revisions required.)
I hereby recommend the approval of the proposal with minor revisions. (Revisions will be reflected in the final
practicum examination.)
✔ I hereby recommend the approval of the proposal with major revisions. (Revised proposal must be submitted
in writing and re-approval by the examination committee.)
I do not recommend the approval of the proposal. (Student must submit and present a new proposal.)
Remarks: (Please don’t leave this blank. You may use the back of this page for additional comments.)

Grade Equivalent Printed Name

P 70-100 Signature over Printed Name
F <70 Examination Committee

 ACADEME ADVISOR  Panel Member

 EXTERNAL ADVISOR  External Panel Member