Republic of the Philippines

Bulacan State University

City of Malolos, Bulacan
Tel/Fax (044) 791-0153

Office of the Dean of Instruction

COURSE SYLLABUS
ME PROJECT STUDY 1
First Semester, AY 2019-2020

COLLEGE : Engineering DEPARTMENT : Mechanical

COURSE CODE : ME 571
FACULTY : Zedrick T. Farin, Abigail Elaine T. Recacho

CONSULTATION HOURS: by appointment

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

The first phase of mechanical engineering project study involves writing and
defense of the project proposal.

LEARNING OUTCOMES (LO):

On completion of the course, the student is expected to be able to do the following:

Attributes of Ideal
Learning Outcomes (LO)
Graduate (AIG)
LO 1 – Develop the skills in conducting research
Highly competent
related activities.
LO 2 – Determine the value of critical thinking in the
Ethical professional
conduct of research.
LO 3 – Observe the value of honesty and integrity in
Service-oriented the collection and presentation of data, with the
initiative of searching new knowledge.

Contribute to country’s LO 4 – Identify a researchable topic and can write a

sustainable growth and research proposal; in which the result/s are likely to
development be fruitful and will give significant contribution to the
educational development.

BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0 Page 1 of 14
FINAL COURSE OUTPUT:

At the end of the term, students are required to submit a research proposal
containing three chapters, initial estimate of the needed resources in the
fabrication of the project particularly the raw materials and expenses plus the
blueprint of the project

RUBRIC FOR ASSESSMENT:

The rubric below will be used to grade the student’s research paper (Chapters 1 –
3) and their performance during Title Defense and Proposal Defense (see attached
forms).

Research topics must be based from the priorities and thrusts of Mechanical
Engineering as being stated in the University Research Agenda, and are being
listed as follows:
1. Indigenous material for possible fuel conversion (new material source
or new equipment for fuel extraction; fuel for automotive)
2. Wind energy utilization (new design; higher power output)
3. Tools and equipment (innovation; if modification of existing it should have
higher efficiency and performance; machine shop tools and equipment)
4. Water conservation (water purifier/equipment/filter; water desalinating
equipment)
5. Pollution prevention (air, water, land pollution; Materials Recovery Facility
– 3 combined groups proposing 3 equipment with new design; paper,
plastic, metal, electronics, etc. recycling machine)
6. Energy conservation (new device with lower energy consumption)
7. Instructional material development (with feasibility study or needs
analysis from the students and professors who’s handling the subject)
8. Industry-based problems (cleaner production; hazardous waste
management; process/system improvement thru machine; ideas obtained
during internship) – should have technical adviser from the company; with
MOA or MOU

During title proposal, each group should observe the following guidelines:
 Prepare atleast 3-5 topics for selection.
 There is really a problem that needs to be address.
 Topics shall highlight the mechanical engineering major (Kinematics,
Machine Design, Refrigeration System, HVAC, ICE, Power and Industrial
Plant, Renewable Energy).
 Project output shall be beneficial to the following: field of research,
extension services, academe, LGU’s, private company.
 The study requires to conduct for a needs analysis or has a request letter
from the community indicating the problem that needs for a solution.
 Each group should present atleast 5 review of related literature obtained
from reliable sources, published indexed journals and previous studies (e.g.
Science Direct, Research Gate, IEEE) that will support the feasibility of the
chosen topic.

BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0 Page 2 of 14

Research Project Title: ______________________________________________
Name of Members:
Presenter 1: ________________________________
Presenter 2: ________________________________
Presenter 3: ________________________________
Presenter 4: ________________________________
Presenter 5: ________________________________
Presenter 6: ________________________________
Criteria
1. Topic Choice – topic is sufficiently narrow to allow for
in-depth exploration of resources and research in a
meaningful manner.
2. Audience Adaptation – Presentation of research and
recommendations are appropriate to a degreed
professional environment.
3. Mechanics – Fewer than 3 mistakes in spelling,
grammar, and punctuation. NOTE: Use Microsoft
BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0
Bulacan State University
College of Engineering
Mechanical Engineering Department
Evaluation Form
Does not meet criteria Meets criteria Exceeds criteria Rating
Topic is of enough scope to Topic is of narrow scope and investigates
The instructor has not approved topic
adequately research. Topic uses a a novel area of a subject. The topic is
presented in the paper during the title
standard question and a standard aligned with the priority and thrusts of the
defense, or the approved topic is not
approach to a subject. The topic is University. Also, the research topic can be
handled in a sufficiently narrow
aligned with the priority and thrusts seen with potential as inputs in research-
manner. (5 points)
of the University. (10 points) based extension program. (15 points)
The presenter uses inappropriate The presenter demonstrates confidence
language and does not meet the while speaking. Can established direct
Language and adaptation meet the
professional standards or eye-to-eye contact in the audience.
expectations of a professional
expectations of the audience. He/she He/she meets the expectation of his/her
environment. He/she is comfortable
is obviously tense and nervous while audience because of his/her appropriate
while speaking. (10 points)
presenting the research project. (5 language and good power point
points) presentation. (15 points)
1 – 3 mistakes 0 mistakes
More than 3 mistakes (5 points)
(8 points) (10 points)
Page 3 of 14
 Word’s built-in spelling and grammar checker to ensure
no mistakes for submitted work.
4. Citations – Includes at least 8 credible sources properly
cited. NOTE: Use Microsoft Word’s Reference toolbar or
you can use www.citationmachine.net to ensure proper
citations. Use online library databases and journals
(journals from Science Direct or Research Gate) to find
credible sources. Avoid information uploaded in
Wikipedia.
5. Organization – Paper has clearly discernable points
and transitions, and the scope of placement of
information is clearly tied to the topic.
6. Logic – Arguments and conclusions are logical and are
solidly based upon research presented in the paper.
7. Proper Use of Concepts and Feasibility –
Demonstration and utilization of course concepts in
recommendations that are both feasible and reasonable
to place into practice.
8. Applicability – The conclusions and recommendations
are applicable in a variety of environments or situations.
NOTE: Only criterion 1 will be rated during the title defense and criteria 2,3,4,5,7 will be rated during the proposal defense for the course subject ME Project Study 1. Criteria 2,3,5,6,7,8 will be rated
during the final defense for the course subject ME Project Study 2.
______________________________
Juror’s Printed Name and Signature
BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0
Fewer than 8 credible sources, or
sources are not properly cited.
(5 points)
Paper’s organization and structure is
not focused; there lacks progression
from the Introduction, problem
statement and review of related
literature. (5 points)
Errors in logic (insufficiency of
information, improper application of
causation, etc.) or lack of evidence.
(5 points)
Incorrect application of any course
concepts, or problems with feasibility
of recommendation. (5 points)
The materials can only be applied to
a very specific work or engineering
situation; the findings cannot be
generalized. (10 points)
Panel’s Total Rating
Page 4 of 14
8 – 12 credible sources
(8 points)
Paper’s organization and
progression is clear.
(8 points)
All arguments are sufficiently
defended. No errors in logic.
(8 points)
Correct application of multiple
course concepts in development of
recommendations;
recommendations are possible and
reasonable. (8 points)
The findings are suitable in nature to
address various organizations or
situations. The research output can
be extended to community or can be
as input for technology transfer. (15
points)
13 or more credible sources
(10 points)
Paper is very well organized and includes
the use of headings and subheadings with
styles to help visually show structure. (10
points)
Multiple types of logical arguments
included in substantiating findings during
analysis. (10 points)
Recommendations are feasible and
demonstrate substantial benefit (increased
profit, reduced cost, increased morale,
better efficiencies, fewer defects). (10
points)
The findings answer a question or problem
in the course, and the materials are
applicable to a student studying in an
engineering program. The research output
has potential to be commercialized. (20
points)
 Bulacan State University
College of Engineering
Mechanical Engineering Department

Students’ Name:
_____________________________ _____________________________
_____________________________ _____________________________
_____________________________ _____________________________
Thesis Title: _________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

Rubric for Chapter 1 – The Problem and its Background

Does not meet criteria Meets criteria Exceeds criteria

Criteria Score
(15 points) (20 points) (25 points)

The problem is not clearly stated and identified. Identify the problem and contextualize problem in society or Identify the problem, contextualize problem in society or community and grab reader’s
Introduction With 3 or more revisions community. With 2 revisions attention. With 1 or no revision

Statement of the The author fails to identify the general problem The general problem of the study is clearly stated but there
The paper has stated clearly the general and specific problems and with no revisions.
problem and lacks specific problems. are some minor revisions in specific problems.

Significance of the The listed beneficiaries are not significant or will State how is the study can improve the life or work of the With the right lists of beneficiaries and with clear explanations on how it is different than
study not directly benefit from the study. beneficiaries. With 2 revisions other studies if the current project is a modification. With 1 or no revision

Limitations of the
study Identify 1 – 3 limitations and explains in detail and hint how these limitations will be
Identify only one (1) limitation. Identify 1 – 3 limitations and explains in detail.
addressed or made sense of.

Total Rating ___/100

Rated by: _______________________________________ Noted by: _______________________________________

Name and Signature of Adviser Name and Signature of the Instructor

BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0 Page 5 of 14
 Bulacan State University
College of Engineering
Mechanical Engineering Department

Students’ Name:
_____________________________ _____________________________
_____________________________ _____________________________
_____________________________ _____________________________
Thesis Title: _________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

Rubric for Chapter 2 – Theoretical Framework

Lacks justification to meet the criteria Meets criteria Exceeds criteria

Criteria Score
(15 points) (20 points) (25 points)

The chosen engineering concepts have

Relevant no relation in the current study, or the The study provides 2 – 3 relevant theories and explains in detail. The study is guided with 4 or more relevant theories.
Theories Chapter 2 has only 1 relevant theory.

Summarize major contributions of significant studies and articles Evaluate the current "state of the art" for the body of knowledge reviewed, pointing out major
Some related literature is irrelevant on
Related to the body of knowledge under review, maintaining the focus methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or
the current study. The relation between
Literature and established in the introduction. Articulate how each of the issues pertinent to future study. Conclude by providing some insight into the relationship between
the reviewed literature in the current
Study literature areas combined makes a strong foundation for this the central topic of the literature review and a larger area of study such as a discipline, a scientific
study is not clearly discussed.
research study. endeavor, or profession.

Summarized key concepts in Chapter 2 specifically the infoware,

The framework does not able to
Conceptual humanware and technoware. Provides the sequence of Summarized key concepts in Chapter 2 specifically the infoware, humanware and technoware.
summarize all the key notes in Chapter
Framework procedures to be executed in completing the project. With 1 Provides the sequence of procedures to be executed in completing the project. With no revision
2.
revision

Total Rating ___/100

Rated by: _______________________________________ Noted by: _______________________________________

Name and Signature of Adviser Name and Signature of the Instructor

BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0 Page 6 of 14
 Bulacan State University
College of Engineering
Mechanical Engineering Department

Students’ Name:
_____________________________ _____________________________
_____________________________ _____________________________
_____________________________ _____________________________
Thesis Title: _________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

Rubric for Chapter 3 – Research Methodology

Lacks justification to meet the criteria Meets criteria Exceeds criteria

Criteria Score
(15 points) (20 points) (25 points)

Methods and The study lists the research design but does not Name the design of methodology and explain how this methodology is good Name the design of methodology and explain how this methodology is good match to answer the
techniques comprehensively discussed. match to answer the research question. research question and cite research that supports this design choice.

The study does not able to discuss the quantity of Identify how many, criteria for in/exclusion and characteristic (demographics). Identifies sampling,
Population and
the participant or the chosen sample does not well- Identify how many, criteria for in/exclusion and characteristic (demographics) selection, recruitment, and consent/safeguard process (mortality rate). Use proper citations for each
sample
represent the population. process – how this is based on another mode

The materials being used have no clear description Describe in detail and even show examples of the instrument, highlight key Describe in detail and even show examples of the instrument, highlight key features, and explain how
Instrument of how those are being used. features, and explain how this tool is a good match for study. this tool is a good match for study. Use proper citation for referencing instrument design and modeling

Procedure List the steps to conduct study so specifically that someone could replicate. List the steps to conduct study so specifically that someone could replicate. Articulate who did what and
The steps to follow in conducting the study is not
Articulate who did what and when. Explain why you chose these steps. Uses when. Explain why you chose these steps. Uses proper citation for Methodology Written in past tense.
comprehensively discussed.
proper citation for Methodology Written in past tense. Articulate how author is an insider/outsider with this sample/site data collection.

Data processing There is no process stated in analyzing the data Identify the process you used to analyze data. Describe how you can validate Identify the process you used to analyze data. Describe how you can validate your findings. Use proper
and analysis gathered. your findings citation for analysis.

Total Rating ___/100

Rated by: _______________________________________ Noted by: _______________________________________

Name and Signature of Adviser Name and Signature of the Instructor

BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0 Page 7 of 14
OTHER REQUIREMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS:

The student will be assessed at other times during the term by the following:
Quizzes, Term Examinations and Activities.

GRADING SYSTEM:

Chapter 1 – 3 --- 40%

Title Defense --- 25%
Proposal Defense --- 25%
Attendance --- 10%

PASSING GRADE: 75%

The academic performance of the student shall be rated using the following
grading system:

Final Grade Equivalent Grade Final Grade Equivalent Grade

1.00 97 – 100% 2.25 82 – 84%
1.25 94 – 96% 2.50 79 – 81%
1.50 91 – 93% 2.75 76 – 78%
1.75 88 – 90% 3.00 75%
2.00 85 – 87% 5.00 Failed

NOTE: Student who will receive a rating of “INC” have a maximum of one (1) year
to complete the requirements; otherwise, it automatically becomes “5.00”.

LEARNING EPISODES:

Learning
Topics Week Learning Activities
Outcomes
1. Reminding the
students with the
Vision and
Mission of the
University.
Memorizing
BulSU Hymn and
BulSU March.
2. Affixing
1
signatures on the
student’s
Certificate of
Registration.
3. Discussion of the
course subject
syllabus
highlighting the
class policies and

BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0 Page 8 of 14
 the contents of
the student’s
waiver and
parent’s
confirmation.
4. Review of the
fundamentals of
research and
discussing the
parts of research - On campus
paper (review of lecture (Student
Chapters 1 & 2 interaction
and discussion of during the
Chapter 3). discussion)
5. Assigning groups 1-2
- Activities
per section and involved the
selection of group proper citation
members
of sources
(arranged by the
(journals, etc.)
subject instructor)
6. Announcing the
schedule for the
Title Defense
7. Preparation for
the Title Defense
- Researching for
and student
consultation with topics that are
regards on the aligned in the
LO 4 3
contents and research
format of the agenda of the
power point University.
presentation.
8. Research Title - Title defense
Defense 4
presentation
- Develop skills in
5-17
writing a
Schedule for
research paper.
submission:
9. Writing Chapter 1- - Write and
Chapter 1 –
3; consultation submit Chapter
September
regards with the 1-3 with the
proper contents 13 (initial) &
given amount of
LO 1,2,3 and format of the September time.
paper. 27 (final and
- Use Microsoft
10. Preparation for edited)
Word’s
the Proposal
reference
Defense Chapter 2 –
toolbar and
October 11
other online
(initial) &
citation sites
October 25
like Mendeley.

BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0 Page 9 of 14
 (final and - Gather and
edited) organize
collected data
Chapter 3 – and transform it
November 15 in a presentable
(initial) & paper.
November 29 - Make a review
(final and of related
edited) literature that
supports the
theory and
concepts that
will be used in
research
project.
- Observe the
ethics in
conducting
research such
as avoiding
plagiarism.
11. Proposal Defense
and submission of 18 - Presentation of
final and revised (Targer 1st – summarized
copy of Chapter 2nd week of Chapter 1-3 of
1-3 December) research paper.

REFERENCES:

Bell, J., & Waters, S. (2014). Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First
Time Researchers (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Inc.
Denscombe, M. (2012). Research Proposals: A Practical Guide. McGraw-Hill Inc.
Rugg, G., & Petre, M. (2006). A Gentle Guide to Research Methods. McGraw-Hill
Inc.

CLASS POLICIES:

1. Students are required to wear the University I.D always. As well as the
prescribed school uniform on days required or appropriate attire on free
days within the campus.
2. Absences incurred due to any of the following reasons shall be excused:
official representation in curricular, co-curricular and extra-curricular
activities; sickness duly certified by the attending physician or the University
physician and force majeure. Absence(s) incurred due to any of the
aforementioned reasons do not exempt concerned students from complying
with the regular requirements of their course. An excused absence,

BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0 Page 10 of 14
 however, should not exceed more than thirty percent (30%) of required total
attendance per semester. Any student who accumulates more than twenty
percent (20%) of the time of unexcused absences from any of his/her
subject before the midterm examinations shall be dropped automatically
from that subject. The instructor concerned shall mark him/her FDA (failure
due absences) or UD (unofficially dropped) from his subject.
3. A student shall be marked absent from the class if he/she arrives 20 minutes
after the start of the scheduled time. However, student must not be deprived
of attending the lesson if he wishes. Unless the subject teacher concerned
gave prior notice, students may leave their assigned room if the teacher
fails to come within 15 minutes after the start of the scheduled time for a
one-hour class, 30 minutes for a two-hour class, 45 minutes for a three-hour
class, and so on. The student shall be marked absent if he/she leaves their
assigned room before the prescribed waiting time.
4. Students must avoid any form of class distractions and disturbances
including using of gadgets during class hours. Student must turn off their
cellphones or put them in silence mode.
5. Students must observe and practice proper ethical behavior to maintain the
harmonious relationship with the subject instructor and fellow classmates.
If the student has concerns on his/her subject instructor, or even in the
subject itself, he/she may approach the instructor during the appointed
consultation hours. Furthermore, he/she may also approach the department
head first, and then to the College Secretary if he/she cannot approach the
instructor due to his/her personal reasons.
6. Student(s) who will be caught cheating, by any means (e.g. using
unauthorized notes or formula books, conversing with other students during
the exam proper), in any examination taken will automatically make his/her
examination void during the first offense and further be given with a grade
of 5.0 for the next offense.
7. Correction of scores earned on any examinations taken be done only during
the class hours upon returning the paper. Any corrections that will be proven
as being fabricated by the student will be given the same sanction as being
stated from the previous policy.
8. Administration of special and removal examinations to an individual or
group of students is subject to the recommendation of the subject teacher
and approval by the unit head concerned.
9. For transparency of giving fair grades, the students shall not be deprived to
know the procedures used to compute grade and reevaluate his/her class
standing at any time. The student should be informed of his/her final grade
before it is encoded/posted.
10. No faculty shall change any grade after it has been posted. In exceptional
cases, where an error has been committed, the instructor/professor may
request authority from the Dean of his college/campus to make the
necessary change, provided, that the supporting document is presented. If
the request is granted, a copy of the authority from the Dean authorizing the
change shall be forwarded to the Office of the Registrar for proper
recording.

BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0 Page 11 of 14
(student’s copy)

Student Waiver

I, _____________________________, of legal age, residing at

________________________________________________________________,
and a ____ year student of Bulacan State University, taking BS in
___________________, by this document hereby declare:

1. That I understand and agree to abide by the policies as being stated above
for this course subject _______________________________ for which I
will be taking during this ___ semester, A.Y. _________ and that may be
implemented by my subject instructor.
2. Furthermore, I renounce and waive all claims against the subject instructor
if I will fail in the course subject or if I will be given any sanctions due to my
negligence.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature this __th day of

________ 20__, here at City of Malolos, Bulacan.

_________________________________
STUDENT SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME

Confirmation

That I, _______________________ (father/mother/guardian), of legal age, Filipino

and a resident of__________________________________________________,
hereby agree and state:

1. That I understand and giving my consent to the subject instructor as he/she

will subject my son/daughter to the above stated policies and will implement
sanction(s) for any negligence observed.
2. That I confirmed the above waiver appearing in this document.

__________________________________
PARENT/GUARDIAN SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME

(Please attach a copy of any valid identification card of the parent/guardian, as well with the student
I.D. Also, provide your contact number and e-mail address written on the copy of student I.D.)

BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0 Page 12 of 14
(instructor’s copy)

Student Waiver

I, _____________________________, of legal age, residing at

________________________________________________________________,
and a ____ year student of Bulacan State University, taking BS in
___________________, by this document hereby declare:

1. That I understand and agree to abide by the policies as being stated above
for this course subject _______________________________ for which I
will be taking during this ___ semester, A.Y. _________ and that may be
implemented by my subject instructor.
2. Furthermore, I renounce and waive all claims against the subject instructor
if I will fail in the course subject or if I will be given any sanctions due to my
negligence.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature this __th day of

________ 20__, here at City of Malolos, Bulacan.

_________________________________
STUDENT SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME

Confirmation

That I, _______________________ (father/mother/guardian), of legal age, Filipino

and a resident of__________________________________________________,
hereby agree and state:

1. That I understand and giving my consent to the subject instructor as he/she

will subject my son/daughter to the above stated policies and will implement
sanction(s) for any negligence observed.
2. That I confirmed the above waiver appearing in this document.

__________________________________
PARENT/GUARDIAN SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME

(Please attach a copy of any valid identification card of the parent/guardian, as well with the student
I.D. Also, provide your contact number and e-mail address written on the copy of student I.D.)

BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0 Page 13 of 14
Prepared by:

Zedrick T. Farin

Subject Instructor

Abigail Elaine T. Recacho

Subject Instructor

Approved by:

Felizardo S. Camilon Jr., MSME

Department Head – Mechanical Engineering

Noted by:

Renato G. Gopez, MSCE, M. ASEP

Dean of the College of Engineering

BulSU-OP-DI-04F1
Revision: 0 Page 14 of 14