Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Normalization of The Dielectric Dissipation Factor For Transformer Insulation
The Normalization of The Dielectric Dissipation Factor For Transformer Insulation
http : //www.cigre.org
A. SHKOLNIK
Israel Electric Corporation
Israel
SUMMARY
_____________ 1
uhr80@iec.co.il
KEYWORDS
large power transformer, oil impregnated cellulose insulation, dielectric dissipation factor.
_____________ 2
uhr80@iec.co.il
Fig.1 Top part of winding lead Fig.2 Bottom part of winding lead
The humidity of separate sites of insulation zones cannot always be revealed by DDF
measurement under traditional schemes, or will lead to increase DDF that will be sufficient
for an estimation of the problem [3]. The increased water content and dissolved gases in oil
needs DDF measurement for as many elementary zones as possible, if measurements under
traditional schemes do not provide an estimation of the insulation condition with sufficient
certainty.
The measured DDF value for new transformer insulation, as a rule, should not exceed 1%
at 20 ºC. In view of the past experience, some customers include stronger requirements in the
specifications and limit DDF value to 0.5%. Some utilities establish requirements for DDF
values according to rated voltage and power of in service transformers.
Considering that:
1. DDF of elementary insulation zones is defined by means of DDF insulating materials
present in the given zone and their relative density in general DDF for given zones.
2. DDF of these materials depends on different factors influencing them (humidity,
temperature, acidity, pollution).
From this follows that DDF dependences on temperature for different zones of insulation
will vary. The DDF dependences on temperature are defined by a condition of solid insulation
and oil. The DDF of the humidity solid insulation in a greater degree depends on its
_____________ 3
uhr80@iec.co.il
temperature in comparison with DDF of dry insulation (Fig. 5÷8). The DDF of oils strongly
depends on temperature (Fig. 5÷8), but for oil in good condition, its DDF is much lower than
DDF of solid insulation and its contribution to DDF of the insulation zone of the transformer,
as a rule, is insignificant (Fig. 5, 7). For oil in poor condition, its contribution to DDF of the
insulation zone of the transformer, as a rule, is significant (Fig. 6, 8).
The graphs (Fig. 5÷8) of DDF dependence on temperature show the influence of the
relative density of DDF for solid insulation (factor K1 from [1]).
DDF,% DDF, %
2.5
0.4
OIP OIP
2
0.3 OIL OIL
K1=0.3 1.5 K1=0.3
0.2 K1=0.5 K1=0.5
1
K1=0.7 K1=0.7
0.1 0.5
0 0
o
0 20 40 60 80 T, C 0 20 40 60 80 T,oC
Fig.5 DDF of good OIP and good OIL Fig.6 DDF of good OIP and poor OIL
DDF,%
DDF,%
1.5
2.5
OIP OIP
OIL 2 OIL
1 K1=0.3
K1=0.3
1.5
K1=0.5 K1=0.5
K1=0.7 1 K1=0.7
0.5
0.5
0 0
o
0 20 40 60 80 T, C
0 20 40 60 80 T,oC
Fig.7 DDF of poor OIP and good OIL Fig.8 DDF of poor OIP and poor OIL
DDF,% DDF,%
0.50 1.20
0.10 0.20
o
0 20 40 60 80 T,oC 0 20 40 60 80 T, C
_____________ 4
uhr80@iec.co.il
DDF,% DDF,%
1.00 1.80
basic basic
0.80 1.40
>T >T
<T <T
0.60 1.00
0.40 0.60
0.20 0.20
o
0 20 40 60 80 T, C 0 20 40 60 80
o
T, C
The dependence of the DDF values on temperature measured during the manufacturing
process for the different insulating zones of a power transformer rated 123 MVA, 215 kV are
given in Table. The measurement results recalculated to a temperature of 20 ºC of DDF are
obtained with a considerable tolerance.
scheme DDF DDF DDF Err. DDF DDF Err. DDF DDF Err.
20ºC 52ºC Corr. % 41ºC Corr. % 31ºC Corr. %
H-L+T 0.15 0.17 0.09 43 0.16 0.10 32 0.15 0.12 23
H-T 0.16 0.19 0.10 41 0.18 0.12 28 0.17 0.13 18
H-L 0.14 0.15 0.08 46 0.14 0.09 36 0.14 0.11 23
L-H+T 0.15 0.15 0.08 50 0.15 0.10 36 0.15 0.12 23
L-T 0.15 0.16 0.08 47 0.16 0.10 32 0.15 0.12 23
From the results follows that the uniform limits established for all insulating zones of the
transformer do not provide sufficient estimation accuracy of the condition of the insulation.
The recalculation of the measured DDF values at a given temperature relative to the base
temperature results in a significant error in relation to DDF values measured at the base
temperature.
A small increase of DDF value may be caused by a significant increase of DDF for a solid
insulation material in an insulating zone with small relative density of DDF for solid
insulation.
Therefore, for normalization of DDF values for transformer insulation, the values of DDF
for oil and solid insulation may have uniform limits.
The measurement methods and the normalization of DDF for oil are known [4] and DDF
for solid insulation may be obtained by calculations based on the measured values of DDF for
the transformer's insulating zone and the use of relative density factors of DDF materials
present in this zone.
For new transformers, the limits of DDF for oil impregnated press board and paper are
0.6% and for laminated wood - 1 % may be recommended at temperature 20 ºC. For
transformers in operation, the corresponding limits of DDF depending on rated voltage (1%
_____________ 5
uhr80@iec.co.il
and 1.5% for voltage up to 110 kV; 0.8 % and 1.3% up to 170 kV; 0.7% and 1.2% above 170
kV) may be recommended.
The excess of calculated values of DDF for solid insulation above the limits or significant
differences between them for different insulating zones of the transformer must lead to a
search of the reasons of these changes.
The estimation of humidity of solid insulation may be performed by a method based on
the definition of the relative humidity of oil [5]. This method can be applied to de-energized
and to operating transformers. Thus, even in an operating transformer it is possible to estimate
the humidity of the insulation for the different temperature zones of the transformer.
The cases of increased humidity in some insulating zones (for example, caused by the
penetration of water into the transformer) can be successfully detected by a method based on
DDF measurement of elementary insulating zones and the calculation of DDF for the solid
insulation for each zone.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The use of traditional methods for the estimation of the insulation condition of a
transformer by means of DDF measurement for insulating zones and their recalculation
to given temperature leads to significant errors.
2. For an estimation of the insulation condition is recommended to determine DDF values
for solid insulation in each elementary zone of the transformer and to compare it to
recommended limits of DDF.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] A. Shkolnik. "The Dielectric Dissipation Factor Method for Transformer Diagnosis".
(D1-205, CIGRE 2006).
[2] IEEE Std C57.12.90-1999. IEEE Standard Test Code for Liquid-Immersed Distribution,
Power, and Regulating Transformers.
[3] J. Bleyer, P. Prout. "The Value of Power Factor Testing". (Transmission and Distribution
Word, 2005, November).
[4] IEC 60422-2005. Mineral insulating oils in electrical equipment. Supervision and
maintenance guidance.
[5] A. Shkolnik. "Determination of Water Content in Transformer Insulation". (ICDL 2002).
_____________ 6
uhr80@iec.co.il