Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5
Mukund Dixit and Vandana Dixit
On september 0, 1987, Mr. Alok Kumar Gupta, Jaipur He started his own business with the dealership of
7, Chairman and Managing Director of Kanpur cancdies produced by others. With the experience gained
Coafecionerics Private Limited (KCPL), was in a meet- he se: up a producion unit in Jaipur in 1946. Berween
ng with his rothers, Vivek, 42, and Sanjay, 33, to decide 1946 and 1950 thirty units were set up in the unorganised
their response to the proposal of AOne Confectioneries sector in Rajasthan to sell a variety of candies. As the
Private Limited (APL) that KCPIL might consider becom- Competion increased the margins came down. KCPI.
ng its coniract manufacturer. API. was a leading national could not compete on costs as its costs were higher than
player in the confecuonery industr. It had des ired to ex- the other nanufacturcrs. Mohan Kumar faced a financial
ancd its suppl: to the market by subcontracting orders crisis. He decided to shift the production to another state
o othcr manufacturers. It had also cesired to retain full and reduce costs. In 1954, he bought one and a half acres
control over the quality and production processes. It had plot in Radha Industrial Estate, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh
promised to the subcontractors that it would compensate UP) and set up a candy making unit. He became the first
them adecuately in terms of volume of business and con- entrepreneur to set up a candy making unit in UP. He
version charges. To KCPL the avan ages were in getting appointed three sales representatives to cover the enire
an assured return oa is investment and access to APLs state, establish dealership, and promote "MKG" as a lead-
manufacurirg expertise bur the disadvan:ages were in ingbrand. He adverised "MKG" in the vernacular news
the possble loss of inciependence in decision making, papers and on hoardings located at crossroads. To build
cilution of company's own brand, "MKG", and family furher on his success, he established a dealer's nerwork
prestige. in the neighbouring states of Bihar and Madhya Pradesh.
Byr the end of 1960s he was a market leader in candies in
KCPL AND ITs BacKGRoUND the northern region. He decided to invest his surplus cash
to diversify into making glucose biscuits and selling them
KCPL was started ir. 1945 by Mohan Kumar Gupta, then under the "MKG" brand. In 1970, there were two
28, in Japur, Rajas than to sell sugar candies under the national and six regional manutfacturers. The demandlarge
was
brand MKG". Earlier, he was a worker in a candy urit in
growing at more than 15% per annum. The marg1ns were
business
sen to the packing departiment. T he biscuits were
manu
was
prohtable
but the acceleration of
produc- ally packed in pickets of 100 grams
tion was constrained
br the scarcity of ingrecients like In 1986-87 the average
maida, sugar and vanaspati. He extended his monthly production of
range and IKG" biscuits was 120 tonnes. KCPL
on depended
offered cream, salt and Marie biscuits under the
"MKG" both permanent and cas ual workers tor its operations. In
brand. ll there e r e niney'
In 1973-74, KCPL reached the number two permanent employees. The monthly
tion in the market with a
posi salary bill was R2."5 lakh. Casual workers were emploved
monthly sale of !10 tonnes (1 on
daly basis to support activities in the packing and
tonne=100) kg). Prince Biscuits,
promoredbr Ghanshyam material-handling department. The size of casual work
Das in 1960, was the leader with a
monthly sale of 13i force depended on the volume of production. On an av-
tonnes. His
plant, located at Agra, Uttar Pradesh,
had a erage, six casual workers were
employed to
monthly capacity of 150 tonnes. International Biscuits support one
tonne ot
Ltd. ineld the third posiuon with a sale ot 100 tonnes production. The daily wage rate was R50. The
per workers were from the local region. The
month. Its plant Iocated at Mumbai, prime problem
Maharashtra, had a in operations was absenteeism. The workers used to ab-
capacity of 800 tonnes per month. It was a leading plarcT Siuin from work without nouce. The absentcCism wa_ as
in western and eastern
regions. A-One Confectioneries lhigh as fiftr percent. This had led to uncven production.
I imited, an overall national leader with
a otal
capacity The dail producti on varied betwcen 2 tonnes
per day
of 900 tonnes per month, did not have a
signihcant pres- to 6 tonnes
per day. The company sought the advice of
ence in the North.
Howerer, it had a leading position
in technical consuitants on issucs
the South. relaung to cx- capacity
pansion, cquipment selectuon and producuviy' improve
In 1980-31, KCPL.s turnorer in biscuits busincss was ments. The orerall operauons were supervised by Arun
R2 crore, an incrcase of l5
per cent ovcr 1979-80. Its net Kapoor, Manager ((perations). He was a
graduate in sci-
profits wvere 20lakh, an increase of 12 per cent orer the encefrom a local college.
previous year. In 1980-81, KCPL doubled its capacity KCPL bought maicda in bags of 50 kg, sugar in bags
from 120 tonnes per nonth to 240 wnnes
per nonth. In ot
100kg and vanaspati in tins of 15 kg, from local sup-
985-84, its sales increascad tc K3 crore and net proits plers and stocked therm ncar the m1sing unit.
to25 lakh.
the biscuit industry. Only two national players, A One Source: Discussion with company executives and trade.
454 Trategic Man agement
brand built over the years. In tact, the family name was vesnents in manufacturing? Was the conversion charge
dependent on the success of the biscuit line. In the early fair? How would Pearson view the venture was another
years ot its growth, Mohan Kumar had the vision of iss ue.
emerging as a leading national brand and compeing suc The other questions were: What did the family mem
cessiully with APIL bers want from their business ventures? What would they
There were also anxieties in terms of how the re- like to give to their sons when they grew up? They had to
lauonship with APL would work out and how APL's decide soon as they were not sure whether other biscuit
experience of managing large plants in Chennai would manufacrurers were also interested in the opportunity
help in running a small plant in Kanpur. Would there be and would out beat KCPL in approaching APL.
interference? Would they be asked to make additional in-