Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Economic and Political Weekly
The Subaltern as
Unavoidably, the term citizen appears
in two different senses in the pages that
follow. The first is that of the bearer of
Subaltern Citizen
the legal right to residence, political
participation, state support and protection
in a given territory. The second is this
more diffuse sense of acceptance in,
The "re-presentation" of the subaltern (a relational position in and acceptance of, an existing order and
the way power is conceptualised) as subaltern citizen is not existing social arrangements.
One immediate advantage of the use of
about the technical question of citizenship; rather the claim is the term "subaltern citizen" is that it
about historical agency, and about belonging - in a society and in prevents the easy erection of a barrier
its self-construction. For 200 years and more, the struggles waged between us (citizens, the people with
by the oppressed and subordinated, i e, the subalterns, were seen history), and them (the subalterns, people
without), as well as that between our times
as struggles for recognition as equals. The history of these efforts
(the time of equality, democracy, the
appeared as a history of sameness. However, in the later decades
recognition of human worth) and earlier
of the 20th century, this struggle was extended to encompass times (the time without such reason and
another demand - the demandfor a recognition of difference - the such understanding). "Not so very"long
existence of a variety of differences that explained the diversity, ago, the earth numbered two thousand
million inhabitants: five hundred million
density and richness of human experience. It is this paradox
men, and one thousand five hundred million
that needs to be answered, while debating the construction of natives". That was Sartre in his 1961
a subaltern'citizen: how is the long-standing struggle for preface to Fanon's Les Damnes de la
equality supposed to be folded into this newly asserted right Terre.2 Yet we know how persistent the
to the recognition of difference ? thought has been. It is salutary therefore
to emphasise that the subaltern citizen is
GYANENDRA PANDEY
subalternity to one of citizenship, although a necessary element of all social arrange-
again such a process may indeed be traced ments, and that the condition ofsubaltemity
rT his essay begins with a provocation in different parts of the world, not least exists in the age of reason and enlighten-
in its juxtaposition of terms from in the context of the anti-colonial struggles ment no less than in that of barbarism;
two very different discourses: "sub- of the 18th to 20th centuries. I am con- in the advanced, capitalist, supposedly
altern", a relational position in a conceptu- cerned with a somewhat different propo- liberal north, as surely as it does in the
alisation of power, a space without identity, sition, having to do with the potential that poorer, "developing", illiberal societies of
as Gayatri Spivak has recently described the subaltern possesses (or the threat s/he the south.
it;k and "citizen", a juridical figure in a poses) of becoming a full member of the That said, let us return to the figure of
pronouncement of autonomy and rights. community, the village, the neighbourhood the subaltern as s/he has appeared in recent
I need to clarify the reason for this and the polis. investigations of history and society classed
juxtaposition. Thus, the point in my re-presentation of under the rubric of subaltern studies.
The subaltern is, by definition, a politi- the subaltern as subaltern citizen is not
cal category. Citizen is not the ideal term centrally about the technical question of
for a rendering of the inherently pplitical
The Peasant Paradigm
citizenship, statutory or anticipated, of the
character of subalternity. But, until we kind that has been accessible in demo- For a quarter of a century now, in this
think of another more suitable alternative, cratic or quasi-democratic societies over project of a new critical history that origi-
let me work with this.
the last two centuries. For this has plainly nated in south Asia, the archetypal figure
For the purposes of the present state- not been an issue for most human beings of the subaltern has been the third world
ment, it is "citizen" that qualifies for the major part of recorded history. The peasant. From Ranajit Guha's insurgent
subalternity, not "subaltern" that qualifies claim is rather about historical agency peasant and Bagdi agricultural labour; to
(or describes) the status of citizenship. My broadly defined, and about belonging - Mahasweta Devi's poor tribal peasant
use of the phrase "subaltern citizen" is not in a society and in its self-construction. women (translated by Gayatri Spivak); to
primarily intended to suggest the sub- That is to say, it is about the living of Amin's 'otiyars' or peasant volunteers of
ordinate status of certain citizens, though individual and collective lives, and the Chauri Chaura, Skaria's bhils and
of course it can be used precisely to describe limitations on that living: about the Hardiman's patidars; toChatterjee's "frag-
such a condition in particular times and potential for life and creativity, in given ments of the nation" in which as one
places. Nor is it used to describe a his- historical circumstances, and the restriction reviewer noted the industrial working class
torical process of moving from a status of of that potential. was conspicuously absent; and even in
in the activities of the jute mill labourers,one might suggest that we have had to
to take a few prominent examples from the contend with an insufficiently acknow- The Wretched of the Earth
writings in Subaltern Studies,3 it is this ledged obstacle. This has to do with a
figure - superstitious, illiterate, ill- subterranean faith that persists, perhaps What do we gain in our exploration of
equipped, isolated and non-political as s/he subalternity by the pairing of the terms
even in the writings of many subalternist
had appeared in much of the received social scholars, in the lack of fit between "subaltern"
the and "citizen"? Here is my
science and historical literature - that peasantry and industrialised bourgeois submission. The term citizen helps to
emerges again and again as the paradigm society, in the "incipience" of peasant underline - in a way that the word "sub-
of the subaltern. political (hence, historical and cultural)
ject" perhaps cannot, even with a recog-
"Historiography has been contentconsciousness,
to and the belief that peasants
nition of its split meaning, as "subject of"
deal with the peasant rebel merely as an to advance - towards modernity and
need and "subject to" - the fact of historical
empirical person or member of a class", full cultural and political citizenshipagency
of and political arrangement (or "per-
wrote Guha, "but not as an entity whose the modern world. suasion"). It underscores the necessary
There is another dimension to this dif-
will and reason constituted the praxis called presence of the subaltern for the existence
rebellion".4 The task of subaltern histo-
ficulty. Many (one might even say, most)of dominance, not to say of society. It
modern peasants and agricultural labourers indicates also the necessity of choice
riography was to recover this underdeve-
loped figure for history, to restore do
the
not wish to remain peasants or agricul-(however limited), and the ongoing nego-
agency of the yokel, recognise that tural
the labourers. They seek to be in thetiation of lives and worlds. For the struggle
peasant mass was contemporaneous cities, with the amenities of modern civicto reproduce even the bare minimum
with the modern, part of modernity, existence
and - comfortable homes and jobs;conditions of survival (or humanity) in an
establish the peasant as the maker of
running water, electricity and access tooppressed "everyday" has been an impor-
power (of all kinds); motorised transport;tant aspect of social existence through the
his/her own destiny. "What distinguished
good schools and hospitals; and leisure centuries.
the story of political modernity in India
time that they may organise in a variety The words subaltern and subalternity of
from the usual and comparable narratives
of the west", as Dipesh Chakrabarty of putways.6 That was the burden ofcourse reinforce what the quest of a critical
it in a retrospective account of the Ambedkar's argument against Gandhi'shistoriography - Marxist, feminist, anti-
Subaltern Studies project, "was the fact
romanticisation of "village India", and thecolonial, subalternist, minority - has long
significance
that modern politics... was not founded on of his choice of the western been about: the endeavour to recover lives,
an assumed death of the peasant. The
gentleman's suit and hat over Gandhi'sand possibilities, and politics that have
peasant loin-cloth. The attempt to re- been marginalised, distorted, suppressed
peasant did not have to undergo a historical
mutation into the industrial worker in cover the peasant as a contemporary ofand sometimes even forgotten. They allow
order to become the citizen-subject modernity,
of and a maker of the modern,us to reinforce the point that not all "citi-
the nation."5 thus runs up against the common sense ofzens" (or human beings) are born equal,
This was an insightful and important the age, that the peasant, for all his or herthat many remain "second class" even when
departure. The peasant was modern no heroism, has remained at the receiving end granted the formal status of citizens, and
less than the working class or the insur- of larger forces of historical change andthat many are denied formal citizenship
ance agent. The peasant archetype itself progress. altogether- today, and of course over most
was confounded in many respects. Large Whatever its achievements, the attemptof human history.
numbers of peasants became part-peasant/ to recover the peasant subaltern for history The aim of such an intervention, as the
part-worker, moving between the "rural" has had to live with an enduring view of south Asian Subaltern Studies project has
and the "urban" on a regular or cyclical peasants as passive objects, or what one made amply clear, is not simply to recover
basis, and even between continents, owing might call the inertia of modern politicala neglected underside of human experi-
to colonial displacement, economic thought, premised to a large extent on the ence, and to announce that subaltern groups
imperatives and tax structures. The passing of "traditional" society. Seen as also counted in the unfolding of history,
societies of the "third world" were con-
the pre-political survival of a pre-indus-but to rethink the pattern of historical
temporaneous with those of "Europe", trial social order in a whole variety ofdevelopment as a whole, grasp the contra-
social and political analyses, from Marx's dictions that lie at its heart and outline
not a relic from the past, produced in
tandem with the advanced industrial Eighteenth Brumaire to Gellner's discus-political possibilities that have been lost
west, productive of it. sion of the passage from an agrarian to anto view or remain to be elaborated.
Once the argument about the peasant industrial age,7 the peasant has been the As mentioned at the beginning of this
is made for south Asia, its applicationobject
to of all kinds of radical social engi-essay, I have put forward the term "citizen"
neering
the historical experience of other parts of throughout the 19th and 20th cen-as a qualifier for the "subaltern" an in-
the world (including Europe) is readilyturies. Peasant, "the adjective used fordicator of the political quality of all
describing the masses", still stands for subalternity (and all dominance). To ex-
evident: and colleagues working on Africa
and Latin America have generously citedbackwardness in society and state, asplicate the argument a little, it will help
the south Asian initiative as they havevarious commentators have noted.8 It isto turn for a moment to perhaps the most
pursued some of the same questionsinin
this context that I propose the recastinginfluential philosophical explanation of the
relation to the histories of their continents.
of the figure of the subaltern subject intomotor of human history and the sources