Professional Documents
Culture Documents
elsevier.com/connect/authors-update/why-systematic-reviews-matter
This article was written as part of the Cochrane International Mobility Programme.
Introduction
The vast scale of scholarly literature occasions various problems. One is how to
comprehensively record and assess the state of knowledge on a particular topic. A
potent means of doing so is that of systematic reviews. The continuous growth of
research, coupled with the demand to systematically summarize the available evidence
to inform decisions from consumers and stakeholders, led to the formal development of
systematic reviews (SRs) in the late 20th century1-3.
Systematic reviews search, appraise and collate all relevant empirical evidence in order
to provide a complete interpretation of research results. Although conventional SRs are
typically used in clinical research and social sciences, they have found application in
various other subject areas for example in advertising, education, international
development, public policy, ecology, environmental sciences, engineering and basic
science research4-7.
1/4
In 1972, Archie Cochrane published a textbook titled “Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random
Reflections on Health Service”10 . Cochrane drew attention to the vital importance of
randomized control trials in determining the effectiveness of health treatments. This led
to a greater international emphasis on the need to improve research synthesis by policy
makers, academics, and clinicians3. Gradually, topic areas outside of healthcare also
adopted SRs as a way of comprehensively and systemically summarizing existing
research.
You must adopt a comprehensive, objective and reproducible search strategy to capture
all relevant sources of evidence. In doing so, you can be confident of having incorporated
all the appropriate material for the topic at hand. A thorough search strategy should
involve multiple databases, registries, sources of grey literature
(https://onlinelibrary.london.ac.uk/resources/databases/opengrey)13 , conference
proceedings and abstracts. Following the predefined eligibility criteria, you then need to
analyze the screened search results to extract data from those publications that meet
the inclusion criteria.
Don’t forget to assess the risk of bias when applicable (i.e., in clinical research). Ideally,
these methodological steps should preferably be performed by two authors
independently, one of which is a methodologist and the other a content area expert.
Summarizing the results of the included studies and interpreting their findings in the
light of certainty of evidence and their applicability are the final steps of completing a
systematic review. You can also include a meta-analysis if applicable.
2/4
Why are systematic reviews important?
Systematic reviews offer a number of benefits. For starters, they deliver a clear and
comprehensive overview of available evidence on a given topic. Moreover, SRs also help
identify research gaps in our current understanding of a field. They can highlight
methodological concerns in research studies that can be used to improve future work in
the topic area17 . Lastly, they can be used to identify questions for which the available
evidence provide clear answers and thus for which further research is not necessary 18 .
The process of conducting systematic reviews, especially for new authors, will prove to
be a worthwhile endeavour. Authors refine their knowledge on the subject area of
interest, develop new research ideas, and gain critical skills in synthesising existing
literature.
We hope that you have found this introduction to systematic reviews helpful. Additional
information about SRs can be found on the Cochrane website. If you have any questions
or observations, please feel free to comment below.
References
4/4