You are on page 1of 2

PURCHASING MANAGEMENT – CONCEPT MAP

STUDENT: ABRIL ESMERALDA PACHECO RODRIGUEZ


GROUP: DNM42 TEACHER’S NAME: MYRIAM LÓPEZ PÉREZ
PURCHASING
MANAGEMENT

The requirements for Purchasing organization Other organizational


factors
purchasing organization structure

As specialization on one category


Centralization Formalization Dynamics alters the efficiency of the others,
the division should be made with
FUNCTION TRENDS considerations to:
S An organizational structure must be able
Can be found applicable in case of Its combinations with centralization decision 1.Practical and technical feasibility of
to change to cope with external pressures.
similarities between multiple help to describe four essentially different dividing the line of work; and
1.Ordering includes mainly 1. increasing company. organization types which are also suitable 2.Sub‐tasks should not seriously
the administrative side of strategic role of for defining different purchasing function’s impact the values of other sub‐tasks.
purchasing in the form of purchasing in Centralized: Advantages: Increased
characteristics. It is suggested as being progressive with
expediting orders. This is a corporate professionalism of buyers, More
efficient allocation of purchasing different types of organization evolving
purely operational activity. policy; and thus Include machine bureaucracy‐,
Budget, Higher bargaining power. over time. Also cyclical and oscillating Characteristics
2. shift towards entrepreneurial‐, professional‐, and
2.Negotiating deals with patterns between discrete numbers of
more adhocracy types (Wood, 2005). 1.In centralized and hybrid structures
selecting the economically Disadvantages: Indirect contact configurations have been described.
centralized between supplier and actual user of the implementation of these
most feasible supplier(s) Control as well as decision‐ making is
control the component/producto, methods is more common tan in
from the list of approved agglomerated to the manager which leaves
3. decreasing Increased specialization can limit According to Johnson, et al. (2001) and decentralized organizatios.
vendors; while little or no reasons why to formalize the
number of purchasing function integration Wood (2005), it is not proven that CPOs
operational communication too much 2.Common methods to facilitate such
3. Sourcing involves the suppliers with other department, losing the restructure or design the organization
(Wood, 2005). interaction are cross-functional
purchasing function in 4. increasing overall coherence requirement. driven by and based on an analysis of
teams that include various
procurement decisions prior number of long it fits to a development intense multi site available alternative.
Decentralized: Advantages: counterparties related to the final
to the decision of approved term contracts MTO type of company with heterogeneous
Purchasing department’s better producto.
list. Purchasing is considered 5. buying groups supply demand where contracts are done
strategic from that point. organized contact with local organization, autonomously at different locations due to 3.Indicates the influence of
around end Integration with other functions; different or changing characters of the centralization decisions on the use of
4.Supply chain management buyers are often located together
items rather product. these tools.
broadens the scope of with engineering or manufacturing
than
purchasing by taking specialists.
commodities
responsibility for
synchronizing inbound Disadvantages: Coordination
material flows with the rest difficulties between different sites,
of company’s operations. No clear overview of inbound
material flow leading to
inefficiency

You might also like