Scribd
Upload
526 views2 pages

Student Teachers Actual Teaching Checklist

This document contains a student teacher rating scale used to evaluate performance in 6 areas: personality, lesson planning, content knowledge, teaching methods, classroom management, and questioning skills. Ratings are on a scale of 1 to 5 with descriptors for poor, fair, satisfactory, good, and excellent. The form also converts the quantitative ratings into qualitative grades and percentages to evaluate student teachers.

Uploaded by

Erickson John Enero
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
526 views2 pages

Student Teachers Actual Teaching Checklist

This document contains a student teacher rating scale used to evaluate performance in 6 areas: personality, lesson planning, content knowledge, teaching methods, classroom management, and questioning skills. Ratings are on a scale of 1 to 5 with descriptors for poor, fair, satisfactory, good, and excellent. The form also converts the quantitative ratings into qualitative grades and percentages to evaluate student teachers.

Uploaded by

Erickson John Enero
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Republic of the Philippines

ZAMBOANGA STATE COLLEGE OF MARINE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY


Fort Pilar, Zamboanga City
Tel. No.: (062) 991-0643 Telefax (062) 991-0777 website: http//[Link]

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND LIBERAL ARTS


Student Teacher’s Actual Teaching Rating Scale
Student Teacher’s Name: ______________________________ Inclusive Dates: _______________________
Subject/s Taught: _______________________ School: Off Campus: ____________________
Directions: Place a check (/) on the column to show the best rating that fits each criterion.

Poor Fair Satisfactory Good Excellent


Indicators Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
I. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY

A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed

B. The teacher is free from mannerisms that


tend to disturb the students attention
C. The teacher’s personality is strong
enough to command respect
D. The teacher shows dynamism and
enthusiasm.

E. The teacher has well-modulated voice.

II. LESSON PLANNING


A. Lesson Plan is well-prepared

B. There is congruence between:

1. Objective in Subject Matter;

2. Objective and Teaching Procedure;

3. Objective and formative test;

4. Objective and assignment


III. CONTENT
A. The teacher demonstrates in depth
knowledge of the subject matter.

B. He/ She is able to relate lessons to


actual life situations

C. Keeps abreast of new ideas and


understanding in the field.
D. Gives sufficient and concrete examples
to create meaningful learning
experiences.
IV. TEACHING METHODS
A. Method/s used was/were suited to the
needs and capabilities of students
B. The teacher was creative enough to
adopt his/her method to the students’
capabilities
C. Visual aids and other examples were
used to illustrate the lesson
D. The teacher made effective use of the
formative test after teaching.
Poor Fair Satisfactory Good Excellent
Remarks
Indicators
1 2 3 4 5
V. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a dynamic way of
checking:
1. Attendance

2. Assignment/Homework/Agreement

3. Practice Exercises

4. Group Work/Projects

5. Passing in and out of the room


6. Correcting, distributing, and
collecting paper
B. Order and Discipline were present in the
Classroom
C. Visual aids were within easy reach of the
teacher during his/her teaching.
VI. QUESTIONING SKILLS
A. The teacher’s questioning skills
stimulates discussion in different ways
such as:
1. Probing for learner’s understanding
2. Helping students articulate their
ideas and thinking process
3. Promote risk-taking and problem
solving
4. Facilitate factual recall
5. Encourage convergent and divergent
thinking.
6. Stimulate curiosity

7. Helps student to ask questions.

Total:

EQUIVALENT
Quantitative
Points Qualitative
Grade Percentage
145 - 165 Excellent 1.48 – 1.00 92.73 – 100
124 - 144 Good 1.99 - 1.51 85.09 - 92.36
103 - 123 Satisfactory 2.50 – 2.02 77.45 – 84.73
83 – 102 Fair 2.99 – 2.53 70.18 - 77.09
Below 50 Poor Above 3.00 Below 70

Evaluator’s Name and Signature _____________________________ Date Evaluated ___________________

You might also like