Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COL Notes
COL Notes
Conflict of laws does not give jurisdiction, rights over the parties. It is between procedural law and
substantive law. It just tells when a court may have jurisdiction over the person; tells us what the law
is applicable.
When there is a foreign element involved, these issues in conflict of laws come to life: adjudicatory
jurisdiction, choice of law, recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.
- would the decision regarding the case be recognized by another jurisdiction? Can a judgement from
another country be enforced here in our country?
- in the US - you acquire jurisdiction over the person by means of these principles: minimum contacts
and fundamental fairness. These principles are not yet accepted in the Philippines.
-in the PH - you acquire jurisdiction over the person by serving of summons.
- jurisdiction over the subject matter is acquired when the plaintiff files the case.
Dismiss
- lack of jurisdiction
-forum non conveniens. Read bank of america v ca
Traditional approach
-vested rights theory
- local law theory
- caver’s
Renvoi - this is only a question if there is choice of law issue. When the conflict of law in the forum law
would say that the foreign law applies. Subsequently, when the conflict of law in the foreign law
would say that forum law will apply. Back and forth.