You are on page 1of 11

Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (2014) 457e467

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Geotextiles and Geomembranes


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geotexmem

Back-analyses of flow parameters of PVD improved soft Bangkok clay


with and without vacuum preloading from settlement data and
numerical simulations
P. Voottipruex a, D.T. Bergado b, *, L.G. Lam b, T. Hino b
a
Department of Teacher Training in Civil Engineering, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand
b
Institute of Lowland and Marine Research, Saga University, Honjo machi 1, Saga 840-8502, Japan

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs) with embankment preloading (conventional PVDs) and with
Received 4 February 2014 embankment combined with vacuum preloading (Vacuum-PVDs) are examined using the field data
Received in revised form obtained from the site of the Suvarnabhumi Airport, Thailand. The flow parameters were back-analyzed
18 July 2014
by comparison of measured and predicted or simulated data. The flow parameters were illustrated in
Accepted 22 July 2014
Available online 10 August 2014
terms of the horizontal coefficient of consolidation (Ch) and the ratio between the horizontal hydraulic
conductivity in undisturbed zone (kh) and the horizontal hydraulic conductivity in smear zone (ks) or (kh/
ks). Numerical simulations using one-dimensional FEM PVDCON software with equivalent vertical
Keywords:
Conventional PVDs
permeability, kev, to determine the appropriate Ch and kh/ks of PVDs with conventional embankment
Vacuum-PVDs preloading and with embankment combined with vacuum preloading schemes were made. Furthermore,
Flow parameters numerical simulations using axisymmetric FEM by ABAQUS software, incorporating horizontal (kh) and
Settlement vertical (kv) permeabilities, to determine the appropriate kh/ks based on back-calculated Ch of conven-
Simulation tional PVD and Vacuum-PVD schemes were also done. The Vacuum-PVD scheme indicated faster rate of
settlement than conventional PVD scheme by about 1.7e1.8 times with slight reduction of the kh/ks
ratios. For conventional PVD, it was demonstrated that the increase in kh/ks ratios reduced the simulated
rate of settlement.
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction permeable drainage layers on ground surface. For design of this


method, the surcharge load shall be equal to or greater than the
Prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs) with embankment pre- maximum past pressures of the clay subsoils. However, some dis-
loading is popular and economical method of soft ground advantages of this method are long consolidation time, limited
improvement (Bergado et al., 1996a, b; Chai et al., 2001; Shen et al., embankment height and instability problem of the surcharge
2005; Chu and Yan, 2005; Rowe and Taechakumthorn, 2008, Abuel- embankment. The vacuum consolidation was first applied by
Naga et al., 2012; Ong et al., 2012; Deng et al., 2013; Cascone and Kjellmann (1952) to reduce the consolidation period. The applica-
Biondi, 2013; Bari and Shahin, 2014). This method is based on the tion of PVDs with embankment and vacuum preloading has been
advantage of higher horizontal hydraulic conductivity than the used and studied up to the present (Holtz, 1975; Choa, 1989;
vertical hydraulic conductivity. The process of this method is Cognon et al., 1994; Bergado et al., 1998; Tang and Shang, 2000;
draining the excess pore water out from the clay subsoil during the Mohamedelhassan and Shang, 2002; Indraratna et al., 2004,
process of consolidation due to the hydraulic gradients created by 2005, 2009, 2010; Chai et al., 2001, 2003, 2005a, b, 2006a, b,
the embankment or surcharge preloading. Thus, the pore water 2007, 2008, 2013; Bergado et al., 1996a, b, 2006; Rujikiatkamjorn
from soil can flow easily towards the drain in the horizontal di- et al., 2007, 2008; Saowapakpiboon et al., 2008a, b, 2010, 2011;
rection, and then flow freely along the drain vertically towards the Indraratna et al., 2012). The advantage of vacuum preloading
application is reducing the pore pressure and maintaining constant
total stress instead of increasing the total stress. Thus, the effective
* Corresponding author. stress increases due to the reduction of pore pressure (less atmo-
E-mail addresses: pnv@kmutnb.ac.th (P. Voottipruex), dbergado@gmail.com,
spheric) in the soil mass. The net effect is an additional surcharge
bergado.dennes@gmail.com (D.T. Bergado), lglam@ctu.edu.vn (L.G. Lam), hino@ilt.
saga-u.ac.jp (T. Hino). ensuring early attainment of the required settlement and an

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.07.004
0266-1144/© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
458 P. Voottipruex et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (2014) 457e467

increased shear strength resulting in increased embankment Table 1


stability. The compressibility consolidation parameters.

Type Unit weight Compressibility POP Cv_theory


2. Field settlements from conventional PVD and [kN/m3] (kPa) [m2/yr]
RR CR Ca
VacuumePVD schemes
Top layer, 18.50 0.035 0.350 0.014 45 e
weathered clay
Both conventional PVD and Vacuum-PVD schemes were utilized Very soft clay1 13.80 0.050 0.500 0.020 37 0.79
for improvement in the soft clay foundations of Third Runways and Very soft clay2 14.00 0.042 0.420 0.017 59 0.79
Aprons, respectively, in the Suvarnabhumi International Airport, Soft clay 15.00 0.040 0.400 0.016 100 0.79
Soft to medium 15.70 0.030 0.300 0.012 110 0.79
Thailand as shown in Fig. 1 as reported by COFRA (1996). The soil clay
profile at the site can be divided into 8 sublayers as tabulated in Stiff clay1 18.50 0.008 0.080 0.003 300 e
Table 1. The groundwater level was found at about 0.50 m depth. Stiff clay2 19.00 0.008 0.080 0.003 500 e
The compressibility parameters at the site are summarized in Stiff clay3 20.40 0.000 0.000 0.000 500 e
Table 1. The soil profiles within the site are relatively uniform over
the area with some small variations in the soil thickness. The typical
soil properties along with soil parameters are summarized in Fig. 2 recorded from July 2005 to July 2006. The locations of boreholes
taken from Bergado et al. (2002). BH1, BH2 and BH3 are also indicated in Fig. 1.
In the conventional PVD scheme, the PVDs were installed to For the Vacuum-PVD scheme, the PVDs were also installed to
10 m depth with a spacing of 0.85 m and arranged in a triangular 10 m depth with a spacing of 0.85 m and arranged in a triangular
pattern. This method had the embankment height in 3.8 m with pattern. The instrumentation equipments were installed to monitor
loading in 2 stages. Typically, a 2:1 side slope was used for the low the field behavior. For the Vacuum-PVD scheme, similar monitoring
embankment with height less than 2.5 m. However, a 4:1 side slope equipments were installed. The locations of the inclinometers, pi-
was adopted for the high embankment to reduce the effects of ezometers and the settlement plates are shown in Fig. 4. The
slope erosion due to rainfall. The high embankment is usually following boundary conditions were used in the design of Vacuum-
constructed along with counterweight berms for stability. Several PVD scheme: installation time of drains of 2 months, maximum
types of monitoring instruments were used, including settlement pumping time of 8 months, vacuum pressure of 60 kPa at 5 m
plates, settlement benchmark, deep settlement gages, piezometers, depth, depth or length of PVD of 10 m below ground surface and
inclinometers and observation wells as shown in Fig. 3. The field 60% consolidation requirement based on the final settlement from
collected data of conventional PVD scheme were collected from Asaoka (1978). The embankment was 2.8 m high with unit weight
four areas comprising of SP-W5-001T, SP-W5-031T, SP-W5-021T of 18 kN/m3. The embankment was constructed in two phases,
and SP-W5-023T, respectively, located on the Third Runway of namely: Phase 1 (1.5 m height, day 0) and Phase 2 (1.3 m height, day
Suvarnabhumi Airport Project (see Fig. 1). These data were 14). The field data of Vacuum-PVD scheme were collected from four

Fig. 1. The Midfield Satellite Aprons and Third Runway of Suvarnabhumi International Airport, Thailand showing the test areas.
P. Voottipruex et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (2014) 457e467 459

Fig. 2. Soil parameters of SBIA Project (Bergado et al., 2002).

areas comprising of EW04-ZB03, EW04-ZB07, MSA-ZB36 and MSA- 2 2 kh


Fr ¼ pL (5)
ZB42, respectively, located in the Aprons of Suvarnabhumi Airport 3 qw
Project (see Fig. 1).
The comparison of settlements using conventional PVD and where De is the diameter of the equivalent soil cylinder, dw is the
Vacuum-PVD schemes are plotted with time from Figs. 5 and 6. The equivalent diameter of the drain, kh is the coefficient of horizontal
PVDs with combined embankment and vacuum preloading clearly permeability, ks is the horizontal permeability of the smear zone, ds
indicated faster rate of settlements. The reduction of time to reach is the diameter of the smear zone, z is the distance from the
the 90% degree of consolidation using embankment combined with drainage end of the drain, L is designated as half the length of the
vacuum preloading was 1.7e1.8 times than the conventional PVDs PVD for double drainage and as the length of the drain for single
due to the higher horizontal coefficient of consolidation due to drainage, qw is the discharge capacity of the drain at hydraulic
vacuum preloading. gradient of 1 (one). The diameter of the smear zone, ds, is desig-
nated as twice the equivalent diameter of the mandrel, dm. The
discharge capacity, qw, was designated as Awkw, where Aw and kw
3. Settlement predictions of conventional PVD and are the cross-section and longitudinal permeability of the drain,
VacuumePVD schemes respectively. The time factor, Th, for horizontal drainage can be
calculated using:
The final settlements were calculated from the Asaoka (1978)
Ch t
observational method based on the monitored data from the Th ¼ (6)
D2e
field. The horizontal coefficient of consolidation, Ch, was also back-
calculated at different periods depending on the time of PVDs
where Ch is the coefficient of horizontal consolidation and t is the
installation when the preloading period started.
time elapsed after the application of the load. Sensitivity analyses
The values of Ch were back-calculated using the equations from
were made by varying the values of Ch and kh/ks.
Hansbo (1979) for radial consolidation with PVD improvement as
follows:
  4. Numerical simulations of settlements
8Th
Uh ¼ 1  exp (1)
F
In PVDCON, the finite element formulation considers the effects
of PVDs by modifying the one-dimensional continuity equation of
F ¼ FðnÞ þ Fs þ Fr (2) consolidation as follows (Hansbo, 1981; Chai and Miura, 2000).

where Uh is the degree of consolidation for horizontal drainage; Th kv v2 ðu  pvac Þ 8kh ðu  pvac Þ v3 v
is the time factor for horizontal drainage. The values of F(n), Fs and  þ ¼0 (7)
gw vz2 gw D2e F vt
Fr are given by the following equations:
  where gw is the unit weight of water, z is depth, t is time, 3 v is
De 3
FðnÞ ¼ ln  (3) volumetric strain, u is excess pore water pressure, pvac is the final
dw 4
vacuum pressures, kv is hydraulic conductivity in vertical direction
    and kh is hydraulic conductivity in horizontal direction.
kh ds For FEM simulation with improved zone by using equivalent
Fs ¼  1 ln (4)
ks dw vertical permeability, kev, which was proposed by Chai et al. (2001).
460 P. Voottipruex et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (2014) 457e467

33 33

Sand Blanket Surcharge Fill


Surface Settlement Monument
Dummy
Instrumentation
>30 Platform Level

0
-2
Deep
Settlement
Gauge -5 -5

Inclinometer
-8
Electrical
Piezometer -10 -10
- 12

-15
- 16 Unit : metre

-20 -20 (min.) -20 (min.) -20


PVD

-25
AIT Type Piezometer -25
Legends:

-30 Electrical Piezometer Observation Well Inclinometer


-30
Deep Settlement Gauge Surface Settlement Monument

-35 AIT Type Piezometer Surface Settlement Plate


-35
Fig. 3. Conventional PVD preloading scheme cross-section and monitoring instruments.

Fig. 4. Vacuum-PVD preloading scheme cross-section and monitoring instruments.


P. Voottipruex et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (2014) 457e467 461

Time, t (day)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
0

PVDs Improvement (SP-W5-021T)


200
Vacuum-PVDs Improvement (MSA-ZB36)
400
Settlement, S (mm)

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600
Fig. 7. Multi-layer model for settlement analysis using PVDCON program.
1800

2000
4.1. Settlement simulation using PVDCON program
Fig. 5. Comparison of settlement of PVDs improvement schemes with and without
vacuum pressure at locations MSA-ZB36 and SP-W5-021T, respectively.
For simulations using PVDCON software for conventional PVD
and Vacuum-PVD schemes, the subsoil was divided into 5 layers as
The equivalent vertical permeability, kev, was derived by converted shown in Fig. 7 and it consists of a 2.0 m thick weathered clay
the expressions of Carillo (1942) and Hansbo (1981) into one- layer overlying a 3.0 m very soft clay layer, a 5.0 m soft clay layer
dimensional drainage. The equivalent vertical permeability is and a 3.0 m soft to medium clay layer, respectively. Underneath
given as follows: the soft to medium clay layer of 3.0 m thickness, a 2.0 m thick
medium clay layer can be found. The soil parameters using in
! PVDCON program consist of 9 parameters, namely: total unit
2:5l2 kh weight (gt), natural water content (wn), maximum past pressure
kev ¼ 1þ kv (8)
mD2e kv 0
(svm), compression ratio (CR), recompression ratio (RR), critical
state frictional constant (M), overconsolidation ratio (OCR), coef-
where ficient of vertical consolidation (Cv) and coefficient of horizontal
consolidation (Ch), respectively, as tabulated in Table 2. The design
kh, kv ¼ permeability of undisturbed soil in horizontal and ver- parameters of both conventional PVD and Vacuum-PVD schemes
tical direction, respectively. for settlement analyses are tabulated in Table 3. In the field con-
l ¼ drainage length of PVD improved zone. dition, the simulation used the equivalent vertical permeability,
m ¼ factor of PVD geometry as expression of Hansbo (1981). kev, obtained from solution of Chai et al. (2001) for PVDs with
embankment surcharge and PVDs with embankment surcharge
n  k 3 p2l2 kh with vacuum preloading as shown in Fig. 7. The equivalent vertical
m ¼ ln þ h lnðsÞ  þ (9) permeability, kev, was applied in the simulation to represent both
s ks 4 3qw
vertical and radial flow. The vertical permeability, kv, is tabulated
where the parameters have been defined previously. in Table 4.

Time, t (day) Table 2


0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Input data of general soil parameters at SBIA in PVDCON software.
0 0
Depth gt (kN/m3) wn svm CR RR M OCR Cv Ch
PVDs Improvement (SP-W5-023T) (m) (%) (kN/m2) (m2/yr) (m2/yr)
200
Vacuum-PVDs Improvement (MSA-ZB42)
0e2 18.50 70 45 0.35 0.035 1.2 3.31 1.095 2e3Cv
400 2e5 13.80 110 37 0.50 0.050 0.9 1.1e1.5 1.022 2e3Cv
5e10 14.00 100 59 0.42 0.042 1.0 1.1e1.5 1.606 2e3Cv
Settlement, S (mm)

600
10e13 15.00 75 100 0.40 0.040 1.2 1.59 1.314 2e3Cv
13e15 15.70 60 110 0.30 0.030 1.2 1.43 1.314 2e3Cv
800

1000

Table 3
1200
Parameters related to conventional and Vacuum-PVD schemes for settlement
1400 analyses.

Item Unit Values


1600
Drain type: conventional PVD
1800 Equivalent diameter of the drain, dw ¼ (b þ t)/2 mm 51.5
Diameter of the equivalent soil cylinder, De ¼ 1.05S m 0.8925
2000
Smear zone diameter, ds ¼ 2dm mm 191.5
Hydraulic conductivity ratio, kh/ks 2e10
Fig. 6. Comparison of settlement of PVD improvement schemes with and without
Discharge capacity, qw m3/yr 100
vacuum pressure at locations MSA-ZB42 and SP-W5-023T, respectively.
462 P. Voottipruex et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (2014) 457e467

Table 4
Simulation parameters of soft Bangkok clay.

Layer H (m) e0 g (kN/m3) kv (m/day) Cv (m2/day) k n l M ecs

1 2 1.35 18.5 7.02E05 0.0030 0.036 0.3 0.357 0.9 2.11


2 3 2.52 13.8 5.05E05 0.0022 0.076 0.3 0.764 0.9 4.90
3 5 2.44 14.0 5.05E05 0.0022 0.063 0.3 0.627 0.95 4.73
4 3 11.8 15.0 8.42E05 0.0036 0.049 0.3 0.486 1.1 3.76
5 2 1.46 15.7 8.42E05 0.0036 0.032 0.3 0.321 1.1 2.86

4.2. Settlement simulations using ABAQUS software sectional area, Aw, and discharge capacity, qw, or permeability of kw
for the drainage element, the well resistance can be introduced to
ABAQUS software was applied in an axisymmetric FEM software the analysis. The axisymmetric mesh was specified with horizontal
based on Biot consolidation theory that can be employed to (kh) and vertical (kv) permeability. For the simulation model, water
simulate the 2D drain analysis (Hibbitt et al., 2006) The axisym- drained radially to the drain and to the top by vertical drainage. The
metric FEM simulation of PVDs with embankment preloading and simulation parameters are tabulated in Table 4. The horizontal
PVDs with embankment combined with vacuum preloading permeability was assumed to be twice the vertical permeability.
schemes were generated as shown in Figs. 8 and 9, respectively. A The Modified Cam Clay model and CAX8RP (8-node biquadratic
drainage element in finite element mesh was specified to simulate displacement, bilinear pore pressure) element in 2D plane strain
the drainage of vertical drain. Through the input of a specific cross were used in the simulation. Moreover, in a three-dimensional and

Fig. 8. Axisymmetric FEM simulation with separate kv and kh for conventional PVD scheme using ABAQUS software.

Fig. 9. Axisymmetric FEM simulation with separate kv and kh for Vacuum-PVD scheme using ABAQUS software.
P. Voottipruex et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (2014) 457e467 463

Time, t (day) Table 5


The flow parameters from back-calculation of field data with conventional PVD and
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Vacuum-PVD schemes.
0
Type Ch (m2/yr) kh/ks

200 Measured data Conventional PVDs (SP-W5-001T) 2.62 9.2


Predicted curve Conventional PVDs (SP-W5-031T) 2.37 10
Conventional PVDs (SP-W5-021T) 2.58 8.4
400
Conventional PVDs (SP-W5-023T) 2.39 10
Settlement, S (mm)

SP-W5-021T: Vacuum-PVDs (EW03-ZB01) 3.89 5.1


600 Vacuum-PVDs (EW03-ZB05) 5.43 5.9
2
Ch = 2.58 m /yr Vacuum-PVDs (MSA-ZB36) 3.56 7.3
800 kh /ks = 8.4 Vacuum-PVDs (MSA-ZB42) 4.83 10

1000
MSA-ZB36 and MSA-ZB42, respectively. The back-calculated Ch
1200
values of MSA-ZB36 and MSA-ZB42 were 3.56 and 4.83 m2/yr,
1400 respectively, with corresponding kh/ks values of 7.3 and 10. The final
settlements predicted from Asaoka (1978) method of MSA-ZB36
1600 and MSA-ZB42, were 1473.71 and 1725.56 mm, respectively.
Comparing the observed data and predicted data, the predicted
Fig. 10. Comparison of simulated and measured data from field observation with curve agreed well with the observed values of conventional PVD
conventional PVD scheme at SP-W5-021T.

two-dimensional multi-drain finite element analyses (ABAQUS),


Time, t (day)
the predicted results from equivalent 2D (plane strain) and 3D
analyses were similar (Rujikiatkamjorn et al., 2008; Indraratna 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
et al., 2009). 0
Measured data
200
5. Back-calculation of flow and compressibility parameters Predicted curve
using ABAQUS software 400
MSA-ZB36:
Settlement, S (mm)

For conventional PVD scheme, Figs. 10 and 11 show the com- 600 Ch = 3.56 m2 /yr
parison of the observed data and simulated or predicted data at in- kh /ks = 7.3
800
situ of SP-W5-021T and SP-W5-023T, respectively. The back-
calculated Ch values of SP-W5-021T and SP-W5-023T were 2.58
1000
and 2.89 m2/yr, respectively, with corresponding kh/ks values of 8.4
and 10. The final settlements predicted from Asaoka (1978) method 1200
of SP-W5-021T and SP-W5-023T were 1473.71 and 1725.56 mm,
respectively. The rest of the data are tabulated in Table 5. Thus, the 1400
average back-calculated Ch value was 2.49 m2/yr with average back-
calculated kh/ks value of 9.4. 1600
For Vacuum-PVD scheme, Figs. 12 and 13 show the comparison Fig. 12. Comparison of simulated and measured data from field observation with
of the observed data and simulated or predicted data at in-situ of Vacuum-PVD scheme at MSA-ZB36.

Time, t (day) Time, t (day)


0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
0 0
Measured data 200 Measured data
200
Predicted curve Predicted curve
400 400
Settlement, S (mm)

SP-W5-023T:
Settlement, S (mm)

600 MSA-ZB42:
600 Ch = 2.39 m /yr
2
Ch = 4.83 m2 /yr
kh /ks = 10 800
800 kh /ks = 10
1000
1000
1200
1200
1400
1400 1600

1600 1800
Fig. 11. Comparison of simulated and measured data from field observation with Fig. 13. Comparison of simulated and measured data from field observation with
conventional PVD scheme at SP-W5-023T. Vacuum-PVD scheme at MSA-ZB42.
464 P. Voottipruex et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (2014) 457e467

Table 6
Comparison of Ch and kh/ks values of Vacuum-PVD scheme in percent compared to
conventional PVD scheme.

Item Vacuum-PVDs improvement Average

EW03-ZB01 EW03-ZB05 MSA-ZB36 MSA-ZB42

Increase 48.47 129.11 37.98 102.09 77.91


in Ch (%)
Decrease 44.56 41.00 13.09 e 24.46
in kh/ks (%)

and Vacuum-PVD schemes. The values of the Ch and kh/ks for


conventional PVDs and Vacuum-PVDs are tabulated in Table 5.
The percent increase in Ch and percent decrease in kh/ks of
improvement with Vacuum-PVD compared to conventional PVD
schemes are summarized in Table 6. The average percent Fig. 16. Comparison of measured and simulated settlements by PVDCON software with
conventional PVD scheme at SP-W5-021T.
increase in Ch of improvement with Vacuum-PVD scheme
compared to conventional PVD scheme was 77.91% with the
average reduction in kh/ks was 24.47%. Thus, the application of 6. Simulated settlements and sensitivity analyses by PVDCON
vacuum pressure can increase the horizontal coefficient of software
consolidation, Ch because applying vacuum pressure generated
negative pore water pressure along the drain which resulted in For settlement simulations of soft ground improvement with
faster rate of settlement compared to conventional PVD scheme. conventional PVD and Vacuum-PVD schemes using the PVDCON
software, the results showed that the simulated settlement values
were in good agreement with the observed field data because the
settlements simulated by PVDCON software neglected elastic
settlements.
The sensitivity analyses of simulated settlement of improve-
ment with conventional PVD and Vacuum-PVD schemes were
demonstrated by neglecting elastic settlement and the simulated
settlements from sensitivity analysis using PVDCON software are
shown in Figs. 14e18. For sensitivity analyses using PVDCON soft-
ware by varying OCR, kh/ks and the ratio of Ch/Cv using PVDCON
software, the results are as follows:

(1) When varying OCR values (Figs. 14e16), the simulated set-
tlements show that increasing values of OCR can reduce the
simulated settlements as expected. It is noted that the OCR
values are difficult to predict in the subsiding environment of
soft Bangkok clay.
(2) The ratio of horizontal permeability at undisturbed zone to
horizontal permeability at smear zone (kh/ks) affected the
Fig. 14. Comparison of measured and simulated settlements by PVDCON software with simulated settlement, increasing kh/ks, can reduce the pre-
conventional PVD scheme at SP-W5-001T. dicted rate of settlement as demonstrated in Figs. 14e16.

Fig. 15. Comparison of measured and simulated settlements by PVDCON software with Fig. 17. Comparison of measured and simulated settlements by PVDCON software with
conventional PVD scheme at SP-W5-031T. Vacuum-PVD scheme at MSA-ZB36.
P. Voottipruex et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (2014) 457e467 465

Table 8
The appropriate kh/ks from ABAQUS FEM simulation of field data with
conventional PVD and Vacuum-PVD schemes by using back-calculated
C h.

Type kh/ks

Conventional PVDs (SP-W5-001T) 10


Conventional PVDs (SP-W5-031T) 9
Conventional PVDs (SP-W5-021T) 6
Conventional PVDs (SP-W5-023T) 10
Vacuum-PVDs (EW03-ZB01) 7
Vacuum-PVDs (EW03-ZB05) 7
Vacuum-PVDs (MSA-ZB36) 7
Vacuum-PVDs (MSA-ZB42) 10

(2) The back-calculated Ch values for PVDs at locations of SP-W5-


001T, SP-W5-031T, SP-W5-021T and SP-W5-023T were 2.62,
Fig. 18. Comparison of measured and simulated settlements by PVDCON software with
2.37, 2.58 and 2.39 m2/yr, respectively, with corresponding
Vacuum-PVD scheme at MSA-ZB42.
kh/ks values of 9.2, 10, 8.4 and 10.
(3) The back-calculated Ch values for Vacuum-PVDs of EW03-
(3) The ratio of horizontal coefficient of consolidation to vertical ZB01, EW03-ZB05, MSA-ZB36 and MSA-ZB42 were 3.89,
coefficient of consolidation (Ch/Cv) also effected the simu- 5.43, 3.56 and 4.83 m2/yr, respectively, with corresponding
lated settlements. The higher the ratio of Ch/Cv, the higher kh/ks values of 9.2, 10, 8.4 and 10.
rate of simulated settlement. (4) The average percent increase in Ch Vacuum-PVD scheme
compared to conventional PVD scheme was 77.91% with the
For conventional PVD scheme, the appropriate OCR was found average reduction in kh/ks of 24.46%.
to be 1.3e1.5 with kh/ks of 8e10 and Ch ¼ 2Cv where Cv ¼ 1.58 m2/yr (5) Increasing OCR can reduce the magnitude of simulated set-
as shown in Figs. 14e16. Moreover, for a certain OCR value, the tlements. Moreover, the ratio of horizontal permeability at
values of kh/ks tended to increase with time which resulted in the undisturbed zone to horizontal permeability at smear zone
decrease in the rate of settlements. For Vacuum-PVD scheme, the (kh/ks) affected the simulated settlements. Increasing the
appropriate OCR was found to be 1.2e1.3 with kh/ks of 2e10 and ratio of kh/ks, can reduce the rate of simulated settlement.
Ch ¼ 3Cv where Cv ¼ 1.58 m2/yr as shown in Figs. 17 and 18. (6) The ratio of horizontal coefficient of consolidation to vertical
Furthermore, for a certain OCR value, the values of kh/ks slightly coefficient of consolidation (Ch/Cv) also effected the simu-
decrease with time and the consequent increase in the rate of lated settlement. The higher the Ch/Cv ratio, the higher rate of
settlements. The flow parameters from PVDCON software simula- simulated settlement.
tion of field data with PVDs and Vacuum-PVDs are tabulated in (7) The appropriate OCR was found to be 1.3e1.5 with kh/ks of
Table 7. Thus, the addition of vacuum pressure to PVD increased the 8e10 and Ch ¼ 2Cv for conventional PVD scheme where
coefficient of horizontal consolidation, Ch as expected. The other Cv ¼ 1.58 m2/yr.
parameters may not be affected that much. The summaries of (8) The appropriate OCR was found to be 1.2e1.3 with kh/ks of
values for both conventional and Vacuum-PVD schemes are tabu- 2e10 and Ch ¼ 3Cv for Vacuum-PVDs scheme where
lated in Table 8 for convenience and clarity. Cv ¼ 1.58 m2/yr.
(9) The appropriate kh/ks was found to be 6e10 from FEM
simulation by using the back-calculated Ch for conventional
7. Conclusions PVD scheme. In addition, for a certain OCR value, the kh/ks
ratio increased with time which indicated the reduction of
Based on the data and results of the analyses, the following the settlement rate.
conclusions can be made: (10) The appropriate kh/ks was found to be 7e10 from FEM
simulation by using back-calculated Ch for Vacuum-PVD
(1) The PVD with combined embankment and vacuum pre- scheme. Moreover, for a certain OCR value, the kh/ks ratio
loading scheme indicated faster rate of settlement than PVDs slightly decreased which indicated the slight increase of
with embankment in the same total pressure by about settlement rate.
1.7e1.8 times.
Acknowledgments

Table 7 The authors wish to acknowledge the Royal Thai Government


The flow parameters from PVDCON software prediction of field data with conven-
(RTG) and Maruyama Industry Co., Ltd. for their financial support in
tional PVD and Vacuum-PVD schemes.
this research.
Type Ch (m2/yr) kh/ks

Conventional PVDs (SP-W5-001T) Ch ¼ 2Cv 8e10 Appendix


Conventional PVDs (SP-W5-031T) Ch ¼ 2Cv 8e10
Conventional PVDs (SP-W5-021T) Ch ¼ 2Cv 8e10
The method used for calculating the values of Ch and kh/ks
Conventional PVDs (SP-W5-023T) Ch ¼ 2Cv 8e10
Vacuum-PVDs (EW03-ZB01) Ch ¼ 3Cv 4e6
Vacuum-PVDs (EW03-ZB05) Ch ¼ 3Cv 2e4 The back-calculation for calculating the values of kh/ks and Ch is
Vacuum-PVDs (MSA-ZB36) Ch ¼ 3Cv 8e10 illustrated:
Vacuum-PVDs (MSA-ZB42) Ch ¼ 3Cv 6e10

Note: Cv ¼ 1.58 m2/yr. 1. Find the final settlement Sf, from the method of Asaoka (1978).
466 P. Voottipruex et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (2014) 457e467

2. Calculate parameters of PVD: De, dw ¼ (b þ t)/2 and ds ¼ 2dm. Chai, J.C., Miura, N., 2000. A design method for soft subsoil improvement with
prefabricated vertical drain. In: Proceedings of International Seminar on Geo-
technics in Kochi, pp. 161e166. Japan.
3. Calculate F(n), Fs, Fr, Th and qw by assuming values of kh/ks. Chai, J.C., Shen, S.L., Miura, N., Bergado, D.T., 2001. Simple method of modeling PVD
  improved subsoil. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 127 (11), 965e972.
8Th Chai, J.C., Miura, N., Nomura, T., Yoneya, H., 2003. Vacuum consolidation of soft
Uh ¼ 1  exp clayey subsoil using cap-drain. In: Proceedings of the 18th Geosynthetics
F Symposium, vol. 18. International Geosynthetics Society, Japan Branch,
pp. 231e236.
  Chai, J.C., Carter, J.P., Hayahsi, S., 2005a. Ground deformation induced by vacuum
De 3
FðnÞ ¼ ln  consolidation. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 131 (12), 1552e1561.
dw 4 Chai, J.C., Hayashi, S., Carter, J.P., 2005b. Characteristics of vacuum consolidation. In:
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and
    Geotechnical Engineering. International Society for Soil Mechanics and
kh ds Geotechnical Engineering and the Japanese Geotechnical Society, Osaka, Japan.
Fs ¼  1 ln Chai, J.C., Carter, J.P., Hayashi, S., 2006a. Vacuum consolidation and its combination
ks dw
with embankment loading. Can. Geotech. J. 43, 985e996.
Chai, J.C., Miura, N., Bergado, D.T., 2006b. Preloading clayey deposit by vacuum
2 2 kh pressure with cap-drain. In: Proceedings of the 21st Geosynthetic Symposium.
Fr ¼ pL Aomori, Japan.
3 qw Chai, J.C., Miura, N., Nomura, T., 2007. Experimental investigated on optimum
installation depth of PVD under vacuum consolidation. In: Proceedings of the
F ¼ FðnÞ þ Fs þ Fr Third ChinaeJapan Joint Geotechnical Symposium. China.
Chai, J.C., Miura, N., Bergado, D.T., 2008. Preloading of clayey deposit by vacuum
pressure with cap-drain: analyses versus performance. Geotext. Geo-
membranes 26 (3), 220e230.
Chai, J.C., Bergado, D.T., Shen, S.L., 2013. Modelling prefabricated vertical drain
improved ground in plane strain analysis. Ground Improv. 166 (G12), 65e77.
4. Use trial values of Ch, then calculate Th, Uh and S as follows: Choa, V., 1989. Drains and vacuum preloading pilot test. In: Proceedings of the 12th
International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,
Ch t pp. 1347e1350. Riode Janeiro, Brazil.
Th ¼ COFRA (Thailand), 1996. Design and Proposal for the Execution of a Test Field:
D2e
Vacuum Consolidation for the Landslide Road System for Second Bangkok In-
ternational Airport. Bangkok, Thailand.
 
8Th Cognon, J.M., Juran, I., Thevanayagam, S., 1994. Vacuum consolidation technology:
Uh ¼ 1  exp principles and field experienceProceedings of the Vertical and Horizontal De-
F formations of Embankments (Settlement'94). ASCE Spec. Publ. 40 (2),
1237e1248.
Chu, J., Yan, S.W., 2005. Estimation of degree of consolidation for vacuum pre-
S ¼ Uh xSf for each time; t loading projects. Int. J. Geomech. 5, 158e165.
Deng, Y.B., Xie, K.H., Lu, M.M., Tao, H.B., Liu, G.B., 2013. Consolidation by pre-
fabricated vertical drains considering the time dependent well resistance.
Geotext. Geomembranes 36, 20e26.
Hansbo, S., 1979. Consolidation of clay by bandshaped prefabricated drains. Ground
5. Plot the relation between t and S and compare with the Eng. 12 (5), 16e25.
observed data. Hansbo, S., 1981. Consolidation of fine-grained soils by prefabricated drains. In:
6. Assume other values of kh/ks and repeat steps 3e5. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics, vol. 3,
pp. 677e682. Stockholm.
7. Compare predicted settlement curves of each kh/ks with corre- Hibbitt, Karlsson, Sorensen, 2006. ABAQUS/Standard User's Manual. HKS Inc.
sponding Ch values to the observed settlement curve. Holtz, R.D., 1975. Preloading by vacuum: current prospects. Transp. Res. Rec. 548,
8. Select the predicted settlement curve of each kh/ks with corre- 26e69.
Indraratna, B., Bamunawita, C., Khabbaz, H., 2004. Numerical modeling of vacuum
sponding Ch values that best fit the observed settlement curve. preloading and field applications. Can. Geotech. J. 41, 1098e1110.
Use kh/ks corresponding with Ch from step 8. Indraratna, B., Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Sathananthan, L., 2005. Analytical and numerical
solutions for a single vertical drain including the effects of vacuum preloading.
Can. Geotech. J. 42, 994e1014.
References Indraratna, B., Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Kelly, R., 2009. Modeling of combined vacuum
and surcharge preloading with vertical drains. In: Proceedings of the 17th In-
Abuel-Naga, H.M., Pender, M.J., Bergado, D.T., 2012. Design curves of prefabricated ternational Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,
vertical drains including smear and transition zones effects. Geotext. Geo- pp. 2204e2207. Alexandria, Egypt.
membranes 32 (1), 1e9. Indraratna, B., Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Kelly, R., Buys, H., 2010. Sustainable soil
Asaoka, A., 1978. Observational procedure of settlement prediction. Soils Found. 18 improvement via vacuum preloading. Ground Improv. 163 (1), 31e42.
(4), 87e101. Indraratna, B., Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Balasubramaniam, A.S., McIntosh, G., 2012. Soft
Bari, M.W., Shahin, M.A., 2014. Probabilistic design of ground improvement by ground improvement via vertical drains and vacuum assisted preloading.
vertical drains for soil of spatially variable coefficient of consolidation. Geotext. Geotext. Geomembranes 30, 16e23.
Geomembranes 42 (1), 1e14. Kjellmann, W., 1952. Consolidation of clay soil by means of atmospheric pressure.
Bergado, D.T., Manivannan, R., Balasubramaniam, A.S., 1996a. Filtration criteria for In: Proceedings on Soil Stabilization Conference, pp. 258e263. Boston, U.S.A.
prefabricated vertical drain geotextile filter jacket in soft Bangkok clay. Geo- Mohamedelhassan, E., Shang, J.Q., 2002. Vacuum and surcharge combined one-
synth. Int. 3 (1), 63e83. dimensional consolidation of clay soils. Can. Geotech. J. 39 (5), 1126e1138.
Bergado, D.T., Long, P.V., Balasubramaniam, A.S., 1996b. Compressibility and flow Ong, C.Y., Chai, J.C., Hino, T., 2012. Degree of consolidation of clayed deposit with
parameters from PVD improved soft Bangkok clay. Geotech. Eng. J. 27 (1), 1e20. partially penetrating vertical drains. Geotext. Geomembranes 34, 19e27.
Bergado, D.T., Chai, J.C., Miura, N., Balasudramaniam, A.S., 1998. PVD improvement Rowe, R.K., Taechakumthorn, C., 2008. Combined effect of PVDs and reinforcement
of soft Bangkok clay with combine vacuum and reduced sand embankment on embankments over rate-sensitive soils. Geotext. Geomembranes 26,
preloading. Geotech. Eng. J. 29 (1), 95e121. 239e249.
Bergado, D.T., Balasubramanian, A.S., Fannin, R.J., Holtz, R.D., 2002. Prefabricated Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Indraratna, B., Chu, J., 2007. Numerical modelling of soft soil
vertical drain (PVD) in soft Bangkok clay: a case of NBIA project. Can. Geotech. J. stabilized by vertical drains, combining surcharge and vacuum preloading for a
39, 304e315. storage yard. Can. Geotech. J. 44 (3), 326e342.
Bergado, D.T., Sawapakpiboon, J., Korittayanon, N., De Zwart, T.P., 2006. Ceteau-S Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Indraratna, B., Chu, J., 2008. 2D and 3D numerical modeling of
PVD vacuum system in soft Bangkok clay: a case study of the Suvarnabhumi combined surcharge and vacuum preloading with vertical drains. Int. J. Geo-
Airport Project. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Soft Ground mech. 8 (2), 144e156.
Improvement and Geosynthetics, pp. 18e27. Bangkok, Thailand. Saowapakpiboon, J., Bergado, D.T., Chai, J.C., Kovittayanon, N., De Zwart, T.P., 2008a.
Carillo, N., 1942. Simple two and three dimensional cases in the theory of consol- Vacuum-PVD combination with embankment loading consolidation in soft
idation of soils. J. Math. Phys. 21, 1e5. Bangkok clay: a case study of the Suvarnabhumi Airport Project. In: Proceedings
Cascone, E., Biondi, G., 2013. A case study on soil settlements induced by preloading of the Fourth Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics, pp. 18e27. Shanghai,
and vertical drains. Geotext. Geomembranes 38, 51e67. China.
P. Voottipruex et al. / Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (2014) 457e467 467

Saowapakpiboon, J., Bergado, D.T., Hayashi, S., Chai, J.C., Kovittayanon, N., De Saowapakpiboon, J., Bergado, D.T., Voottipruex, P., Lam, L.G., Nakakuma, K., 2011.
Zwart, T.P., 2008b. CeTeau PVD vacuum system in soft Bangkok clay: a case PVD improvement combined with surcharge and vacuum preloading including
study of the Suvarnabhumi Airport Project. Lowl. Technol. Int. 10 (1), simulations. Geotext. Geomembranes 29 (1), 74e82.
42e53. Shen, S.L., Chai, J.C., Hong, Z.C., Cai, F.X., 2005. Analysis of field performance of
Saowapakpiboon, J., Bergado, D.T., Youwai, S., Chai, J.C., Wanthong, P., embankments on soft clay deposit with and without PVD-improvement. Geo-
Voottipruex, P., 2010. Measured and predicted performance of prefabricated text. Geomembranes 23 (6), 463e485.
vertical drains (PVDs) with and without vacuum preloading. Geotext. Geo- Tang, M., Shang, J.Q., 2000. Vacuum preloading consolidation of Yaogiang airport
membranes 28 (1), 1e11. runway. Geotechnique 50 (6), 613e653.

You might also like