You are on page 1of 6

2nd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263

Proceedings – (ELLiC Proceedings Vol. 2, 2018) CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

COLLABORATIVE WRITING
Strengths and Weaknesses to Teach EFL Students and Its Relation to Students’
Self-esteem in Writing
Zahrotun Hanifah
Universitas Sebelas Maret
zahrotunhanifah76@gmail.com

Abstract
As the objectives of learning English is always changing time to time, the way of teaching English
should be adjusted to the changeable learning objectives. Recently, the idea of working
collaboratively has given so much influence towards the development of methodology in language
teaching and learning. Collaborative writing has been broadly discussed as one of the best methods
to teach writing. This study aims to describe the strengths and weaknesses of collaborative writing
to teach writing for EFL students and how it links to their self-esteem. The method of this study is
qualitative while the design of this study is case study. The data collecting techniques were
observation, interview, and document analysis. The results showed that collaborative writing gives
opportunity for EFL students to experience the better writing process where students can share and
discuss in exploring ideas, developing ideas, expressing ideas, and evaluating the writing product.
In terms of their self-esteem, students with low self-esteem were discouraged and tended
depending on their writing work on the higher level students. In contrast, students with high self-
esteem were encouraged in writing when they were responsible to lead their friends during writing
process.

Keywords: collaborative writing, self-esteem, teaching writing, case study

Introduction engagement and involvement in language


Writing as one of the four language skill to learning practices, has turned into a value-
master for all EFL students leads researchers laden, purposeful, and communicative
and TEFL developer to develop methods in objective. This collaboration provides the
teaching writing. Recently, the idea of students with opportunities to interact and
working collaboratively that has given challenge their language knowledge in a
successful improvement in teaching learning more effective learning environment. Nelson
process has resulted on the implementation and Murphy (in Widodo, 2013, p. 200)
of collaborative work in EFL writing class propose that in collaborative writing, the
(Hawkey in Rostampour, et al., 2015, p. 46). writing process that students must follow are
By involving in collaborative learning, finding idea and arranging ideas into written
students can experience the better learning form, developing ideas by giving some data
process in a student-centered learning. and information supporting their idea,
Besides, students have the same chance to evaluating their peer’s writing. By passing
participate actively in a collaborative the stages above collaboratively, the students
learning context and construct their linguistic will be easier to find and develop the idea of
knowledge through interacting with other their writing. Besides, peer-review done in
learners (Rostampur, 2015, p. 46). the last stage of the writing process enables
Considering the development of students to improve their grammar mastery
teaching writing method, collaborative and critical thinking (Widodo, 2013, p. 200).
writing has been one of considered methods Many studies have been conducted to
to be implemented in any levels of investigate the effectiveness of collaborative
education. Although writing is still writing to teach writing and it reveals the
considered as individual work, collaborative fact that collaborative writing is one
writing, which is maximizing learners’ effective way not only to teach writing but

COLLABORATIVE WRITING: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES TO TEACH EFL ....... [ 59 ]


Zahrotun Hanifah
2nd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
Proceedings – (ELLiC Proceedings Vol. 2, 2018) CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

also to improve students’ writing skill (Li & have better writing process in which they are
Zhu, 2017, Shahgoli and Farrokhi, 2016, supposed to be involved actively in sharing
Mehrdad et al., 2016). However, the study their knowledge of linguistics resources,
which describes how well collaborative discussing with others related to the topic
writing implemented in writing class is and idea arrangement, and taking part in
merely found. In particular, research on writing production (Widodo, 2013, p. 198,
students’ perceptions of collaborative writing Rostampour, et.al. 2015, p. 53, Kessler, et
projects, “the nature of the [collaborative] al., 2012, p. 106). However, there is no
writing process and of the written text sufficient study exploring how collaborative
produced” has received “scant attention” writing gives beneficial effect to the
(Storch, 2005, p. 155). In fact, most of the students’ psychological condition which is
research on collaborative writing is focused viewed as the important factor in writing
on texts produced for preparatory writing process. Therefore, this article will also
assignments and not on more extensive texts review about how collaborative writing give
meant to stand on their own (Storch, 2005, p. effect in relation to students’ self-esteem.
169). As Storch (2005, p. 169) notes, “To Self- esteem is one of psychological
truly prepare students for collaborative aspects giving a huge contribution to writing.
writing it may require a re-conceptualization Khansir and Abdolahi (2014, p. 156) argue
of classroom teaching”. In terms of English that high self-esteem can help students to
Language Teaching for EFL students, there improve their language competence. Having
are any no sufficient studies exploring about high self-esteem can reduce students’ anxiety
the strengths and weaknesses of during writing process and improve their
collaborative writing to teach EFL learners. motivation and belief that they can pass the
To fill these practical and contextual gaps, writing process smoothly (Salem and Dyiar,
this article attempts to review the strengths 2014, p. 129). Besides, self-esteem functions
and weaknesses of collaborative writing to as a motivation aspect helping them to
teach EFL students. support their ability in writing (Fahim and
Meanwhile, writing is not only about Rad, 2012, p. 24). Considering the influential
the final written product but also it has a contribution of self-esteem towards writing,
process. The writing process consists of a set it can be concluded that a good and effective
of stages in writing. Writing has a writing method should facilitate students to
complicated process in which both students’ have high self-esteem.
language competence and psychological In fact, it is not an easy job to
condition are involved together (Al- implement collaborative writing in a ideal
Shourafa, 2015, p. 236). This means that way. Mrs. AR, a teacher implementing
beside of their language competence, their collaborative writing in a school that I
mental condition is very important to observe found it pretty difficult to implement
determine whether they can pass the writing collaborative writing in her class. Though
process successfully or not. Shirvani and she has understood the principles in
Tajadini (2014, p. 234) break the stages implementing collaborative writing in the
down into six stages namely brainstorming, writing class, she found that collaborative
planning, outlining, organizing, drafting, and writing can roles as supporting factor or even
revising. While working in these stages, inhibitor in writing. That some students have
students’ cognitive and psychological a better performance when they work at
aspects are involved together at the same group and the other are the opposite is one of
time which determines the quality of the the problems she found in implementing
product. Some studies prove that by collaborative writing. Besides, there are
implementing collaborative writing in some influential aspects in writing that a
teaching writing, students are facilitated to teacher should consider but it is too difficult

COLLABORATIVE WRITING: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES TO TEACH EFL ...... [ 60 ]


Zahrotun Hanifah
2nd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
Proceedings – (ELLiC Proceedings Vol. 2, 2018) CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

to do so. From the explanation above, the of digital tools that provides teachers with
investigation of strengths and weaknesses of some powerful features to help 21 st century
collaborative writing to teach EFL students students develop writing skills.
is worth taking into account as one of the Some researches on collaborative
measurement to the success of collaborative writing prove that collaborative writing
writing to teach writing for EFL students. activities, as done in pairs or small groups,
This research was conducted at a Senior can have numerous affective benefits for the
High School in Surakarta. learner. Such activities can enhance student
interaction in the EFL classroom, lower the
1. Research Questions anxiety associated with completing tasks
From the explanation above, the alone and raise students’ self-confidence
research questions are formulated as (1) (Johnson & Johnson, 1998; Raimes, 1998;
What are the strengths and weaknesses of Reid & Powers, 1993; Rollinson, 2005).
collaboration writing implementation for Collaborative writing requires that students
EFL learners?, (2) In what extent utilize a range of social skills that can help
collaborative writing affects students’ self- them tofoster a sense of accountability,
esteem?. cooperation and community (Murray, 1992;
Savova & Donato, 1991; Villamil & De
2. Research Objectives Guerrero, 1996). In addition, Reid (1993, p.
The objectives of this study are (1) to 19) suggests that collaborative writing efforts
find and describe strengths and weaknesses can increase motivation, risk-taking and
of collaborative writing to teach writing for tolerance among learners. Foster (1998, p.
EFL students and (2) to describe how 43) notes that these activities can maximize
collaborative writing relates to self-esteem. student interaction in the target language.
Whether or not, collaborative writing can Self-esteem is considered as one of
support students to have high self-esteem. important aspects in writing. Having high
self-esteem is one of important factors in
3. Literature Review writing. According to Khansir and Abdolahi
Haring-Smith (in Hadjerrouit, 2011, (2014, p. 156), self-esteem can help students
p. 432) states that collaborative writing is a to improve their writing. The role of self-
writing activity involving more than one esteem is used among students as an aspect
person who gives the same chance and duty of motivation that helps them to show their
to contribute on the creation of a text. ability to write. Branden (1992, p. 8) states
Collaborative writing can be implemented in that self-esteem operates as the immune
a various techniques, such as by using system of consciousness providing
technology as the media, such as wiki, resistance, strength, capacity and believes of
Google docs, or the conventional techniques being attractive and intelligent to cope any
tool. “With the development and challenges in learning process. Self-esteem
advancement of computer networks, online has big roles in both writing process and
collaborative learning becomes possible even writing product. It has four indicators that
if students cannot meet in a classroom” determine the level of self-esteem. In
(Macdonald, 2006, p. 234). Meanwhile, writing, each indicator has its own role to
collaborative writing implemented in a support writing skill. Those are competence,
classroom, can also be encouraged with the worthiness, acceptance, and confidence.
use of the World Wide Web. Many Moreover, writing has two
institutions have attempted to make use of dimensions which are product and process.
technology in collaborative activities. Apart As stated by Haynes and Zacarian (2010, pp.
from blogs, wikis, chat rooms, forum, 89-90), learning to write is a developmental
learning logs, Google Docs is an online suite process that involves being able to

COLLABORATIVE WRITING: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES TO TEACH EFL ...... [ 61 ]


Zahrotun Hanifah
2nd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
Proceedings – (ELLiC Proceedings Vol. 2, 2018) CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

communicate meaningfully through writing, practice of the teacher and the performance
write for a range of purposes, use culturally of the students in the classroom. The writer
appropriate terms, and use correct form and also checked the documents (field notes and
grammar. It implies that to have good interview transcript) as data source. By
writing product, students must master at least combining and analyzing the data from
the four requirements above that involve different sources, the trustworthiness
students’ cognitive competence in learning achieved as well. After obtaining the data,
English. Meanwhile, in order to pass the the data were analyzed by using some
writing process successfully, students must techniques which are data reduction, data
control their psychological condition. Many display, drawing conclusion and verification
students determine to give up when they got to analyze the data which are data reduction,
problem in the process of writing. Therefore, data display, drawing conclusion and
in order to help them to solve problems verification.
during the writing process, students need to
have high self esteem. Findings and Disussion
Based on the pre-research interview, teacher
Methodology (AR) defines collaborative writing as a
The method of this research is case study. method to teach writing whose most
According to Stangor (2011, p. 138), a case activities done collaboratively. In the pre-
study is an investigation of a single research interview, teacher AR also
individual in which unusual, unexpected, or confirmed that not all the steps of
unexplained behaviors become the focus of collaborative writing were done maximally.
the research. Thirty students of English Sometimes, teacher AR only implements
Education Department of Islamic State some steps of collaborative writing because
University of Surakarta were used as the of the time allotment. Thus, teacher AR did
subject of this case study. not take the other steps maximally.
This research was started by To get the data of the implementation
conducting observation for one month in a of collaborative writing in teacher AR’s
writing class in which the collaborative teaching, pre-observation was conducted on
writing was implemented. During the the teaching-learning activities in the
observation, the researcher observes how classroom. Based on the observation, teacher
collaborative writing was implemented AR tried to implement collaborative writing
including the material, procedure, and the maximally. Teacher AR actively guided the
participation of the students. Besides, the students and give clear instruction in each
researcher also notes the obstacle that the step of writing. In the first step, teacher AR
lecturer and students face during the writing guided students to find the topic of the
process. Interview was used to obtain the writing by giving some choices of topic.
data of students’ self-esteem towards After determining the topic of the writing,
collaborative writing. The interview is open teacher AR guided students to make outline
interview consisting of 9 questions. Seven of their writing and make main sentence for
students were chooses as the representative each paragraph. Then, the students
to be interviewed. developing the main idea of each paragraph
The validation of the data is collaboratively. During the developing ideas,
triangulation. The researcher took the students face some problems such as
triangulation of source concept in which data debating each other, getting stuck, and even
were collected from participants, event, and getting confused with what they want to
the document. The participants consisted of write. Teacher AR manages this situation by
both the teacher and students of the schools. instructing the students to have a good
The events being observed are the teaching communication with their group in order to

COLLABORATIVE WRITING: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES TO TEACH EFL ...... [ 62 ]


Zahrotun Hanifah
2nd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
Proceedings – (ELLiC Proceedings Vol. 2, 2018) CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

solve problems they face. In the end of Engagement and motivation are two
writing process, the students did peer- factors that influence the process and its
correction. In doing peer correction, some result (Siang and Santoso, 2016, p. 113).
students get difficulties to correct the From the finding, it is proved that having
grammar of their peer’s writing because of high self-esteem and working collaboratively
the lack of grammar mastery. are closely related with motivation and
In term of self-esteem, seven students engagement in learning process. Thus, it can
were interviewed about their self-esteem be concluded that collaborative writing can
condition after joining collaborative writing improve both students writing skill and self-
activities. Three of them have high academic esteem.
achievement, two of them are in medium
level and the last are the low academic Conclusion
achievement. From the interviewed, it is From the discussion above, it can be
found that students having high academic concluded that collaborative writing is an
achievement having better self-esteem. They effective method to teach writing for EFL
stated that by having collaborative activity in students. Collaborative writing gives
writing, their perception of themselves numerous benefits for both students’
increases since they compared themselves to language competence and their self-esteem.
their friends who are in the group with them. Since collaborative writing focus more on
Besides, feeling that they are the smartest the process, students are granted to have
students in their group, they are motivated to better writing process. It means that they
help and assist the other member of the have better skill in developing ideas, making
group during the writing process. their writing coherence, having better
Meanwhile, the medium level students don’t grammar and vocabulary mastery, and etc. In
have significant effect on their self esteem. implementing collaborative in teaching
In opposite, students with low academic learning process, the role of teacher is very
achievement have negative effect on their crucial because students need to be assisted
self-esteem. The dominance of the smart in doing collaborative tasks. Therefore,
students in their group leads them not to teacher should make good preparation
have the same chance in writing as the smart dealing with teaching procedure that is going
students have. As a result, the low students to be implemented in class.
rely their work on the smart students.
Referring to findings, there are some References
points taken as the conclusions. The first is Fahim, Mansoor. Rad, SomayeKhojaste.
that steps of collaborative writing lead to (2012). The Relationship between Self-
high-quality of learning, as Kirby and Esteem and Paragraph Writing of
Lawson (2012) argue that the core Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of
descriptors of high-quality learning are that Psychology, 3(1), 24-29, January 2012.
the learning should be extensive, integrative, Hadjerrouit, Said. (2011). A Collaborative
and generative. “High-quality learning must Writing Approach to Wikis: Design,
be extensive in the sense that it must include Implementation, and Evaluation. Journal
and be based on as large an array of relevant of Science and Information Technology,
information and experience as possible.” 8, 432-450
(Kirby and Lawson, 2012, p. 3) The steps of Kessler, Greg. (2012). “Collaborative
collaborative writing do support the Writing among Second Language
extensive learning. In building relevant Learners in Academic Web-based
information and experience, the concept of Project". Language Learning and
collaborative writing requires students Technology Journal. 16(1). 91-109.
working together to solve problems.

COLLABORATIVE WRITING: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES TO TEACH EFL ..... [ 63 ]


Zahrotun Hanifah
2nd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
Proceedings – (ELLiC Proceedings Vol. 2, 2018) CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

Khansir, Ali Akbar. Abdolahi, Zahra. (2014). Language Teaching and Learning, 4(1),
Self-Esteem and Writing of Iranian EFL 198-206.
Learners. International Journal of
English Language and Literature
Studies, 3(2), 155-164.
Li, Mimi. Zhu, Whei. (2017). “Good or bad
collaborative wiki writing: Exploring
links between group interactions and
writing products". Journal of Second
Language Writing, 35, 38-53.
Mehrdad, Ali Gholami. et.al. (2016). The
Effect of Collaborative Writing Practice
on EFL Learners' Writing Accuracy,
Coplexity and Fluency. Modern Journal
of Language Teaching Methods, 6(1),
288-299.
Rostampour, M, et. al. (2015).
“Collaboratiive or Individualistic
Writing: Which One Is a Better Venue
to Improve Iranian Pre-University
Female Students' Writing Skill? Modern
Journal of Language Teaching Methods.
5(3).46-54.
Salem, Ashraf Atta M. Dyiar Mosaa Abu Al.
(2014). Writing Anxiety as a Pedictor of
Writing Self-Efficacy in English for
Special Education Arab Learners.
International Education Studies, 7(6),
128-134.
Shahgoli, Narminolsadat. Frrokhi, Farahman.
(2016). The Effect of Individualization
Versus Collaboration on the Accuracy of
Written Grramar". Modern Journal of
Language Teaching Methods, 6(5), 356-
371.
Shirvani, Mojdeh. Tajadini, Massoud.
(2014). Using Illustrative Devices and
EFL Learners’Writing Skill. Modern
Journal of Language Teaching Methods
(MJLTM), 4(3), 234-238, September
2014.
Storch, Neomy. (2005). "Collaborative
Writing: Product, process,and students’
reflections". Journal of Second
Language Writing, 14, 153-173.
Widodo, Handoyo Puji. (2013).
"Implementing Collaborative Process
Based Writing in the EFL College
Classroom". Research Paper in

COLLABORATIVE WRITING: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES TO TEACH EFL ...... [ 64 ]


Zahrotun Hanifah

You might also like