Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction:
Trade unions are an integral part of industrial relations in India. They represent
the collective voice of workers and aim to protect their interests and rights in the
workplace. In this article, we will discuss the definition and concept of trade
unions in India industrial relations.
Trade unions are organizations formed by workers to promote and protect their interests
and rights in the workplace.
They are registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, and operate under specific
regulations and laws.
Trade unions are democratically elected and operate on the principle of collective
bargaining with employers.
Concept of Trade Unions in India:
Representation of workers
● Trade unions represent workers at different levels, including at the
enterprise level, industry level, and national level.
● They advocate for the rights and interests of workers through various
means, including strikes, protests, and legal action.
● Trade unions also provide support and assistance to workers in cases of
disputes with employers.
● Political advocacy
● Trade unions in India also engage in political advocacy to promote the
interests of workers.
● They lobby for changes in labour laws and regulations to protect workers'
rights and interests.
● Trade unions also work towards ensuring that workers' voices are
represented in policy-making and legislative processes.
Conclusion:
Trade unions play a significant role in shaping industrial relations in India. They
represent the collective voice of workers and aim to protect their rights and interests in
the workplace. The concept of trade unions in India is based on the principles of
collective bargaining, protection of workers' rights, representation of workers, and
political advocacy.
Representation of workers
● Trade unions represent the collective voice of workers in the workplace.
● They advocate for better wages, working conditions, job security, and other
employment-related benefits.
● Trade unions provide support and assistance to workers in cases of
disputes with employers.
Collective bargaining
● Trade unions operate on the principle of collective bargaining with
employers.
● The process of collective bargaining involves negotiation between
employers and employees to reach an agreement on various
employment-related matters.
● Collective bargaining helps to ensure that workers' interests are
represented in the workplace and can result in better wages, working
conditions, and other benefits.
Advocacy and lobbying
● Trade unions engage in advocacy and lobbying to promote the interests of
workers.
● They lobby for changes in labour laws and regulations to protect workers'
rights and interests.
● Trade unions also work towards ensuring that workers' voices are
represented in policy-making and legislative processes.
● Dispute resolution
● Trade unions play a crucial role in resolving disputes between workers and
employers.
● They provide support and assistance to workers in cases of disputes with
employers.
● Trade unions also engage in collective bargaining to prevent disputes from
arising in the first place.
Political representation
● Trade unions engage in political representation to promote the interests of
workers.
● They support political parties that are favourable to workers' rights and
interests.
● Trade unions also work towards ensuring that workers' voices are
represented in policy-making and legislative processes.
Conclusion:
Trade unions have a crucial role to play in shaping industrial relations in India.
They represent the collective voice of workers and aim to protect their interests
and rights in the workplace. The role of trade unions in India includes
representation of workers, collective bargaining, advocacy and lobbying, dispute
resolution, and political representation. Trade unions are an essential component
of India's labour movement and are crucial for ensuring that workers' rights and
interests are protected in the workplace.
In India, the process of recognition of a trade union involves the following steps:
Formation of a trade union: The first step is to form a trade union with a minimum
of 7 members if it is in the case of an unregistered union, or with a minimum of
10% of the workers if it is a registered union.
Registration of the trade union: The trade union can be registered under the
Trade Unions Act, 1926. The application for registration should be made to the
Registrar of Trade Unions, along with the required documents and fees.
Application for recognition: Once the trade union is registered, it can apply to the
employer for recognition. The application should be in writing and should contain
the name and address of the trade union, its constitution, the names of office
bearers, and the number of members.
1. Unity: Trade unions in India should aim to build greater unity and cohesion
among workers, to better represent their interests and negotiate with
employers.
2. Non-political affiliations: Trade unions should strive to be independent of
political parties and focus solely on representing the interests of workers.
3. Increase membership: Trade unions should work to increase their
membership base by reaching out to more workers, including those in the
informal sector.
4. Broad representation: Trade unions should aim to represent a broad
cross-section of workers, including women, minorities, and those in the
informal sector.
5. Accountability and transparency: Trade unions should ensure
transparency in their operations and be accountable to their members. This
includes regular reporting on finances and activities.
6. Skill development: Trade unions should invest in the skill development of
their representatives to enable them to better represent the interests of
workers.
7. Collaborations: Trade unions should collaborate with other unions,
organizations, and governments to improve working conditions and
workers' rights.
8. Legal awareness: Trade unions should work to increase the legal
awareness of their members, to better protect their rights and interests.
9. Avoidance of strikes and lockouts: Trade unions should aim to avoid
strikes and lockouts, instead of focusing on negotiations and dialogue to
resolve disputes.
INTRODUCTION
HISTORY
● Trade unions in India emerged after the end of World War 1 and have since
become an important platform for workers to voice their demands.
● The Bombay Mill-Hands Association, founded in 1890, was the first labour
association in India, followed by other associations and unions such as the
Madras Labour Union and the All India Trade Union Congress.
● The concept of trusteeship was introduced by Mahatma Gandhi to improve
the relationship between employers and workers, and commissions such
as the Royal Commission on labour emphasised the need for strong trade
unions in India.
● The Apprentices Act, 1961: The object of the Act was the promotion of
new manpower at skills and the improvement and refinement of old
skills through practical and theoretical training.
● The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970: The object of
the Act was the regulation of employment of contract labour along with
its abolition in certain circumstances.
● The Employees’ Provident Funds and Misc. Provision Act, 1952: The Act
regulated the payment of wages to the employees and also guaranteed
them social security.
● The Factories Act, 1948: The Act aimed at ensuring the health of the
workers who were engaged in certain specified employments.
● The Minimum wages Act, 1948: The Act aimed at fixing minimum rates of
wages in certain occupations.
● The Trade Union Act, 1926: The Act provided for the registration of trade
unions and defined the laws relating to registered trade unions.
The labourers, especially the ones who work in the unorganised sectors, lack the
capacity to bargain, and this becomes a major reason for their exploitation. The
right to collective bargaining is provided only to those trade unions that are
registered. But in India, there is legislation regarding the recognition of trade
unions but there is no single legislation on the registration of trade unions.
Realising the need to have central legislation for the registration of trade unions,
the parliament passed the Indian Trade Union (Amendment) Act in the year 1947.
The said Act sought to introduce Chapter III-A into the Trade Union Act, 1926,
which enumerated the conditions required for the mandatory recognition of any
trade union. However, this Act was never brought into force. Therefore, the
mandatory recognition of trade unions is not present under any law in force in
India.
The words in Section 1 of the Act, “except the State of Jammu and Kashmir” were
omitted by the amendment Act 51 of 1970. Thus, the Trade Unions Act of 1926
extends to the whole of India.
Definition clause
Section 2(h) lays down the definition of trade unions. It states the following:
(ii) any agreement between an employer and those employed by him as to such
employment; or
Since it includes both employers’ unions and workers’ unions, the definition of a
trade union under Section 2(h) is excessively broad.
The Madras High Court in the case of the Registrar of Trade Unions, Union
Territory of Pondicherry v. the Government Press Employees Union represented
by its Secretary V. Thirunavukkarasu (1975) observed that the workmen who are
employed in an industrial undertaking, for example, a government press, are
‘workmen’ entitled to the benefits of the Trade Unions Act of 1926.
In the case of Tamil Nadu N.G.O Union v. The Registrar of Trade Unions (1962),
the N.G.O. union’s petition was denied by the High Court of Madras. The registrar
of the trade union in this case rejected the N.G.O.’s union’s application for
registration on the grounds that public servant unions could not be registered
under the trade union Act. In order for the union to be registered under the Trade
Union Act, its members must be workers employed by trade, business, or
industry, and the applicants lack this qualification because they are civil servants
responsible for the state’s sovereign and legal functions. Accordingly, the High
Court dismissed the appeal.
The Calcutta High Court ruled in the case of Registrar of Trade Unions, West
Bengal v. Mihir Kumar Gooha (1962) that E.S.I. Corporation workers would fall
under the definition of workmen and could, thus, register themselves as union
members.
The aforementioned actions must be taken in order to exercise and carry out the
Registrar’s legal obligations under this Act, including any specific powers and
functions that the Registrar may, by order, specify, as well as to specify the local
boundaries within which any additional or deputy Registrar may exercise and
carry out those obligations.
Section 6 of the Act enlists the provisions which should be contained in the rules
of trade union and it provides that no trade union shall be recognized unless it
has established an executive committee in accordance with the provisions of the
Act and its rules, specifies the following matters, namely:
The Supreme Court of India ruled in the 2004 case of Bokajan Cement
Corporation Employees Union v. Cement Corporation of India that membership in
the union did not end immediately upon loss of employment.
Section 7: Power to call for further particulars and require alteration of the name
Section 7 of the Act confers upon the registrar the power to call for information in
order to satisfy himself that any application made by the trade union is in
compliance with Sections 5 and 6 of the Act. In matters where the discrepancy is
found, the registrar reserves the right to reject the application unless such
information is provided by the union.
This Section also confers power to the registrar to direct the trade union to alter
its name or change the name if the registrar finds the name of such union to be
identical to the name of any other trade union or if it finds its name to so nearly
resemble the name of any existing trade union, it may be likely to deceive the
public or members of either of the trade unions.
The Bombay High Court in the case of All India Trade Union Congress v. Deputy
Registrar of Trade Unions (2005) set aside a request to register a trade union with
a name that already existed, claiming it to be expressly contrary to the language
in Section 7(2), leading to the cancellation of registration. It further observed that
the very purpose behind Section 7 is to avoid misleading the general public or
trade union members into thinking that the union seeking registration under the
name for which registration is requested is somehow associated with the union
already registered.
Section 8 : registration
According to Section 8 of the Act, if the registrar has fully satisfied himself that a
union has complied with all the necessary provisions of the Act, he may register
such a union by recording all its particulars in a manner specified by the Act.
Each registered trade union should be a body corporate, which makes it a legal
entity with perpetual succession. It shall have a common seal, the ability to buy,
possess, and enter into contracts with both movable and immovable property, as
well as the ability to sue and be sued using that name.
The Supreme Court ruled in the 1935 case of the Re-Indian Steam Navigation
Workers Union that a Registrar just needs to check that all the technical
conditions are being met, not whether it could be deemed illegal.
Whereas in another case before the Supreme Court of India, ACC Rajanka
Limestone Quarries Workers Union v. Registrar of Trade Unions (1958), it was
determined that an appeal might be filed to the High Court under Article 226 of
the Indian Constitution if the registrar fails to register the trade union within 3
months of the application.
The registrar, according to Section 10 of the Act, has the power to withdraw or
cancel the registration certificate of any union in any of the following conditions:
Where a 2-month show cause notice was not sent by the registrar to the changed
address of the union, it was held by the Bombay High Court in Bombay Fire
Fighters Service Union v. Registrar of Trade Unions, Bombay (2003), that the
registrar did not comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 10 and
quashed the order of cancellation.
Section 11 : appeals
As observed by the Bombay High Court in Mukand Iron & Steel Works Ltd. v. V.G.
Deshpande, Registrar of Trade Unions, Bombay and another (1986), a trade union
has the choice to file an appeal or apply for new registration if the Registrar of
Trade Unions cancels or withdraws its registration. If the appeal is successful, the
trade union would continue to be included on the register as if the decision of
cancellation or withdrawal of recognition had never been made. If a new
registration is allowed, it will take effect as of that date. The Registrar loses all
authority over that order once he cancels or withdraws a trade union’s
registration. Because of the following circumstances, he is unable to evaluate it
or rescind it.
In Philips Workers Union v. Registrar of Trade Unions (1989), the Calcutta High
Court observed that Section 11 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 is no bar to filing an
application under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution.
Section 12 of the Act lays down that all communications and notices to any trade
union must be addressed to its registered office. If a trade union changes the
address of its registered office, it must inform the registrar within the period of
fourteen days in writing, and the registrar shall record the changed address in the
register mentioned under Section 8 of the Act.
Section 13 of the Act states that every trade union which is registered according
to the provisions of the Act shall:
Sections 15 to 28 elucidate the rights which a registered trade union has and also
the liabilities which can be imposed against them.
Section 15 of the Act lays down the activities on which a registered trade union
can spend its funds. These activities include:
This Section also provides the reason for non-contribution to the said fund and
also that a contribution to the fund can not be made as a criterion for admission
into the union.
Section 16 provides that a trade union, in order to promote the civic and political
interests of its members, can constitute a separate fund from the contributions
made separately for the said purposes. No member of the union can be
compelled to contribute to the fund.
A legally recognised labour union may establish a separate fund with the goal of
advancing the civic and political objectives of its members. A recognised trade
union is not allowed to use its general finances for its members’ political
campaigns. The trade union must establish a separate political fund for political
causes. Contributions to such a fund must be separately collected. Some of them
are as follows:
Section 17 of the Act states that no member of a trade union can be held liable for
criminal conspiracy mentioned under sub-section 2 of Section 120B of the Indian
Penal Code regarding any agreement made between the members of the union in
order to promote the lawful interests of the trade union.
The office bearers of the registered trade unions are exempt from penal
punishment for criminal conspiracy, per Section 17 of the Trade Unions Act of
1926. An agreement between two or more people to carry out an illegal act or a
legitimate act through an illegal method is referred to as a conspiracy in English
law.
Criminal conspiracy is defined in Section 120-A of the Indian Penal Code of 1860
as follows:
1. A prohibited act,
2. An Act that is not committed via unlawful methods; such as a contract is
referred to as a criminal conspiracy;
The Trade Union Act of 1926 grants registered trade unions immunity.
Nevertheless, this immunity is only applicable with regard to the legal
agreements made by trade union members for the promotion of legitimate trade
union purposes. The right to call for a strike and persuade members is one of the
rights granted to registered trade unions in the stimulation of their industrial
conflicts. All acts that give rise to civil litigation are considered illegal acts. For
instance, two men who conspire to get workers to violate their employment
contracts are guilty of a crime. However, Section 17 safeguards a trade unionist
from a crime if the arrangement they have entered into is not an agreement to
conduct an offence.
In the case of West India Steel Company Ltd. v. Azeez (1988), a trade union
representative protested against the delegation of a worker to another sector by
blocking or stopping work inside the factory for five hours. It was decided that a
worker in a factory had to obey the directives issued by his superiors. A trade
union leader is not exempt from following the rules. There is no legal authority for
a trade union official or any other employee to share managerial responsibilities.
Section 18 of the Act immunises the members of trade unions from civil or
tortious liabilities arising out of any act done in furtherance or contemplation of
any trade dispute.
For example, in general, a person is subject to tortious liability for inducing any
person to breach a contract. But, the trade unions and its members are immune
from such liabilities provided such inducement is in contemplation or furtherance
of any trade disputes. Further, the inducement should be awful and should not
involve any aspect of violence, threat, or any other illegal activity.
Any authorised officer or member of a registered trade union is eligible for this
immunity. No civil action may be brought against them for conduct related to a
trade dispute on the grounds that it encourages another person to breach an
employment agreement; or interferes with another person’s trade, business, or
employment.
Furthermore, the incentive should be made via legal techniques that are not
against the legislation of the state. There is no protection from physical harm,
verbal abuse, or other illegal tactics.
The Kerala High Court ruled in the case of P. Mukundan and Ors. v. Mohan Kandy
Pavithran (1991) that a strike by itself is not a legally actionable offence.
Furthermore, it was determined that the provisions of Section 18 shield the trade
union, its officers, and its members from legal actions related to the workmen’s
strike.
In the landmark decision, Rohtas Industries Staff Union v the State of Bihar (1962)
by the Patna High Court, it was decided that employers did not have the right to
sue an employee who participated in an illegal strike and subsequently lost
business and output.
In another case, Simpson & Group Companies Workers & Staff Union v. Amco
Batteries Ltd. (1990) by the Karnataka High Court, the Court relied on the
judgement in Chandrana Bros. & Others v. Venkata Rao (1976) to observe that
workers’ protection under Section 18 of the Trade Unions Act is unaffected by
“strike” or “lock-out” situations and remains unchanged. In both circumstances,
the consideration and the principle are similar. Physically impeding the
movement of management staff, contractors, goods, or trucks transporting raw
materials is neither a trade union right nor a basic freedom protected by Article
19 of the Constitution. Section 18 immunity cannot be invoked for such actions.
Picketing is a highly undefined right that only extends to other people’s freedom
of movement. The only acceptable means of persuasion are vocal and visual;
physical interference with people or objects is not permitted.
In the 2005 case of Shahdol Pipe Works v. Zala Loghu Udyog Kamgar Sangh, it
was claimed that the employer had suffered a loss of Rs. 22,500 due to the strike
that the defendant’s trade union had arranged. The Court dismissed the
employer’s request for damages and determined that members of a registered
trade union were exempt from being held accountable for any torts committed in
advance of or in support of a trade dispute. Furthermore, it was not possible to
conclude from the evidence in the current case that the loss was brought on by
the defendant’s trade union members, officers, and supporters.
The provision puts an end to action against trade unions while looking at the
right of trade unions to use and to be used. The union or its members are not
prohibited from bringing a claim for wrongs done to the union. Unlawful threats
and coercion are not protected since doing so would deprive the person of the
Section’s protection.
In East India Hotels Ltd. v. Oberoi International Hotel Employees Union (1994), the
Court emphasised that it is well established that no one has a basic right to stage
demonstrations on company property if doing so will interfere with the office’s
regular operations. The freedom of expression, organisation, and unionisation
that citizens have does not grant them the right to use these rights wherever they
wish. The moment someone else’s right to own their property interferes, the
exercise of this freedom will terminate. The Court added that the law
acknowledges both the existence of unions and the scope and ambit of legal
activity. Such actions or acts may be protected under Section 18 of the Trade
Unions Act of 1926, depending on the specifics of each instance. However, in
order to obtain this safety net, the temptation and interference must be done so
legally.
Torts are considered to be civil wrongs. It can be resolved by civil court action. It
is different from breaking a contract, a quasi-contract, a trust, or other equitable
obligations (like trespassing or creating a private nuisance). However, Section
18(2) grants an exemption from tort liability. The action of the parties must further
result in a trade dispute in order to be eligible for exemption or immunity from
tort liability. If an agent acts without the knowledge of the executive committee of
the trade union or against the specific instructions of the executive committee,
the registered trade union is not accountable for the torts committed by the agent
in the advancement of the trade dispute.
According to Section 20 of the Act, the account books and the list of the
members of any registered trade union can be subjected to inspection by the
members of the trade union at such times as may be provided under the rules of
the trade union.
Section 21 : rights of minors to membership of trade union
Section 21 provides that a person who is above 15 years of age can be a member
of any trade union, and if he becomes a member, he can enjoy all the rights
conferred upon the members of the trade union, subject to the conditions laid
down by the trade union of which he wants to be a member.
Section 21A of the Act lays down the conditions, the fulfilment of which
disqualifies a person from being a member of the trade union. The conditions laid
down in the Act are as follows:
Section 22 of the Act mandates that not less than half of the members of the trade
union should be employed in the industry or work with which the trade union is
connected. For example, if a trade union is made for the welfare of agricultural
labourers, then, as per this Section, half of the members of such a trade union
should be employed in agricultural activities.
The Calcutta High Court in the case of Kesoram Rayon Workmen’s Union v.
Registrar of Trade Unions (1966) observed that if all officers and members of the
executive were needed to be employees of the industry to which the union is
related, Section 22 would have no purpose. Of course, Section 2(h) of the Act
defines a trade union as a group of workers employed in a certain industry.
However, Section 22 specifically states that a non-member of the union may be a
member of the executive or another officer, as long as the required proportion is
not exceeded.
Section 24 lays down that two or more trade unions can join together and form
one trade union with or without dissolution or division of the fund. Such
amalgamation can take place only when voting by half of the members of each
trade union has been effectuated and that sixty per cent of the casted votes
should be in favour of the proposal.
In D.C.M. Chemical Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Registrar of Trade Unions, Delhi (1978),
the Delhi High Court held that according to Sections (3) and (4) of Section 25, the
Registrar has the same authority to register a trade union as he or she does
under Section 8. Regardless of whether the registration is made in accordance
with Section 8 or Section 25, the Registrar must issue the certificate of
registration. Therefore, it cannot be claimed that the revocation of the certificate
of registration under Section 10 solely applies to the issuance of the certificate
under Section 9, which is a result of an order made under Section 8. It cannot be
argued that Section 25 does not include the grant of certificates, and as a result,
anyone who is requesting the reversal of the Section 25 judgement cannot seek
the remedy of cancellation of the certificates of registration. The Court further
observed that Section 10 must be read to cover both situations where fraud or
mistake were used to gain the registration itself as well as only the certificate of
registration.
Section 27 : dissolution
Section 28 : returns
Section 28 provides that each trade union should send the returns to the registrar
annually on or before such a day as may be prescribed by the registrar. The
return includes:
● General statement
● Audit report
● All the receipts and expenditures incurred by the trade union
● Assets and liabilities of the firm on the 31st day of December
Sub-Section 2 of the Section provides that, along with the general statement, a
copy of the rules of the trade union, corrected up to the date of dispatch thereof,
and a statement indicating all the changes made by the union in the year to which
the statement is referred, be sent to the registrar.
Whenever any registered trade union alters its rules, such alterations should be
conveyed to the registrar within a period of not less than 15 days from making
such alterations.
Regulations
Section 29 and Section 30 of Chapter 4 of the Act lays down the regulations
which shall be imposed on the trade union.
Section 29 of the Act confers the right on the appropriate government to make
provisions in order to ensure that the provisions of the Act are fairly executed.
Such regulations may provide for any or all of the matters, which are as follows:
Section 31 to Section 33 of the Trade Union Act lays down the penalties and the
procedure for their application to a trade union which is subject to such a penalty.
Section 31 : failure to submit returns
● If any trade union was required to send any notice, statement or any
document to the registrar under the Act and if the rule did not prescribe
a particular person in the union to provide such information then in case
of default each member of the executive shall be imposed with the fine
extendible to five rupees. In case of continuing default, the fine may be
extended to five rupees a week.
● If any person willfully makes or causes to be made any false entry or
omission in the general statement required under Section 28 of the Act
shall be punishable with a fine extendible to 500 rupees.
The Madras High Court observed in the judgement of Neyveli National Workers
Union v. Additional Registrar II of Trade Unions and Deputy Commissioner of
Labour II, Chennai (1998) that in addition, under Section 10(b) of the Act, the
penalty of cancellation is applied if the Registrar determines that the registration
certificate was obtained through deception, error, etc. All union members who
violate the law will get punishment. However, the penalty outlined in Section 31 of
the Act is only applicable to officeholders who are overdue in completing their
returns. Because the union’s members or the entire body of the union cannot be
punished, they alone must be punished when they fail to perform their duties.
Section 10 of the Act, in summary, foresees the violation by the union. As a result,
Section 10 is related to the offence of the union, whereas Section 31 is related to
the offence of the office-holders. It’s important to keep this distinction in mind.
Section 31 was specifically enacted to punish office bearers only for this reason.
According to that interpretation, the first respondent is likewise ineligible to use
the provisions of Section 10 of the Act to punish the entire union for the offences
committed by the office-bearers.
● Any person who in order to deceive a member of any trade union or any
other person who purports to be part of the trade union,
● Gives a copy of the document with the pretext of it containing the rules
of a trade union.
● Which he knows or has reason to believe that it is not a correct copy of
such rules and alteration and,
● Any person with the like intent give a copy of any document purporting
it to be a copy of the rules of a registered trade union which in reality is
an unregistered union,
● Shall be imposed with a fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
● When the complaint has been made with the previous sanction of the
registrar
● When a person has been accused under Section 32 of the Act, he shall
be tried within six months of the commission of the alleged offence.
Even though trade unions are very important for the well-being of workers, they
also have some shortcomings, which are discussed as follows:
When an organised body negotiates with the employer and fixes the terms of
employment by means of bargaining, this is known as collective bargaining. The
essential element of collective bargaining is that it is between interested parties
and not by third parties.
International labour organisation in its manual in the year 1960 defined the
meaning of collective bargaining as:
Section 8 of the Industrial Relations Act 1990 defines trade disputes. According
to the Act, an industrial dispute refers to any dispute which arises between the
employers and the workers, and it is usually in connection with any one of the
following:
● employment or non-employment,
● the terms or conditions of the employment,
● Something which affects the employment of any person.
Position in India
In India, collective bargaining remains limited in its application and has been
restricted by different labour legislation in India. Different labour laws make
different provisions with respect to the working conditions of the workers. Some
of the labour legislation in India is as follows:
● The Factories Act of 1948 made provisions for the betterment of the
workers in respect of their health, safety, welfare and other aspects
while the workers are employed in factory work. However, all the
provisions of the Act were not applicable in all the factories, for
example, the provision for restrooms will be applicable only if there are
150 or more workers.
● The Employees Provident and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, the
Maternity Benefit Act and the Payment of Gratuity Act.
● The Industrial Disputes Act, of 1947, lays down the procedures by which
the settlement of industrial disputes has to be done. Its procedural
aspects are applicable to all enterprises for the settlement of industrial
disputes.
A closer view of the labour laws in India indicates that most of the workers who
are employed in the organised sectors of the economy are protected under
various labour legislation. The Fifth Economic Census of 1999 revealed that more
than 97 percent of enterprises employ less than ten workers, and most of these
employ less than five workers. This clearly shows that labour laws apply to less
than 3 percent of enterprises.
Further, the acceleration of the formalisation of the workforce with the onset of
liberalisation has also changed the formal sector in terms of shifting jobs from
the formal to the informal sector and, along with it, the formalisation of jobs.
Today, in the formal sector, the number of formal workers is about 33.7 million,
and the number of informal workers is about 28.9 million (2004-05). The increase
in employment (in whatever amount) in the formal sector has largely been
informal in nature. Which in turn has been reflected on the trade bargaining?
In India, the following types of agreements are prevalent for collective bargaining:
CONCLUSION:
The Trade Union Act of 1926 was enacted to protect workers and provide them
with registration, regulation, benefits, and protection for trade unions. Trade
unions play a vital role in the democratic development of a country by
representing workers' needs and demands through collective bargaining, which
is only provided to recognised trade unions. The media has empowered trade
unions, making them influential pressure groups in various sectors.
Free Study Material/ Notes for MBA, BBA, MCA, BCA, MCOM, BCOM, MSc., BSc., Bio
Technology Engineering, Medical Notes
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
The trade unions may be classified according to the purpose for which they
are constituted. Such union may be divided into two categories:
1. Reformist unions
These unions are those which aim at the preservation of the capitalist
society and the maintenance of the usual employer‐employee relationship,
elimination of competitive system of production. They neither seek
comprehensive change nor wish to destroy the existing economic, political
and social structure of the country. They simply try to modify these in
accordance with the desire and requirement of their members, keeping in
view the current moves of the society. For example they may wish to
increase labour’s share in increased production or they may aim at
improving working conditions but enforcing safety measures, they may try
to generate increased purchasing power by providing for worker’s various
cooperative ventures, insurance associations and educational programmes.
Professor Hoxie has further sub‐divided the reformist unions into the
following two types:
i. Business unions
2. Revolutionary Unions
i. Anarchist Unions
These unions aim at changing power through political action. They aim at
enactment of laws eliminating the power of capitalist and giving effective
power to workers.
This type of unionism has been added by Professor Hoxie. These unions
does not subscribe to any ideology. Such types of unions believe in ruthless
pursuit of the matter in hand for which they can follow any means without
bothering for ethical or legal considerations. These unions can further be
divided into two types:
a﴿ Hold up Unions
b﴿ Guerilla Unions
This union has also been added by the followers of Prof. Hoxie, namely the
dependent union. The existence of this type of union is dependent wholly
or partly on the other unions or the employees.
i. Craft Union
The term staff union is popularly used to refer both craft and industrial
unions. The staff union seeks to recruit members of non‐manual sectors
including clerks, supervisors, draughtsmen, computerists, operators,
technicians, managers etc. As the tertiary sector emerges on the economic
platform, the number of employees working in such a sector ﴾like health,
services, local services etc.﴿ also increases, the persons working therein
joins such unions.