180

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
I.A. No. ________/2022
IN
Special Leave Petition (CIVIL.) No. ______/2022
IN THE MATTER OF :

MANOJ KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA ……..PETITIONER

Versus
STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS …….RESPONDENTS

An Application for Exemption from Filing Official

Translation

To,

The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India

and His Companion Justice of
Supreme Court of India

The Humber Petition on behalf of the petitioner above

named:

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the petitioner has filed Special Leave Petition

arising out of the Impugned Judgment and final order

dated 22.03.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of

Madhya Pradesh Principal Bench at Jabalpur in W.P.

No. 14162/2019 (D.B.).

 181

2. That the Annexure P-3, P-6,P-8 to P-10, P-12 to P-

14, and P-16 to P-20 were in Hindi. The official
translation would have taken lot of time and as the
matter is urgent, so it was translated from Hindi to
English by the lawyer well conversant with both
languages.

Prayer:-

It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may

be pleased to :

(a) Exempt the petitioner from filing official

translation of Annexure P-3, P-6,P-8 to P-
10, P-12 to P-14, and P-16 to P-20, and
accept the true English translation thereof
for the purpose of hearing of Special Leave
Petition.

(b) Pass any other or further Order as this

Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the
facts and circumstances of the case.

Filed On : 09.07.2022 Filed By:

New Delhi
PRAVEEN SWARUP
Advocate for the Petitioner
 182

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
I.A. No. ________/2022
IN
Special Leave Petition (CIVIL.) No. ______/2022

IN THE MATTER OF :

MANOJ KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA ……..PETITIONER

Versus
STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS …….RESPONDENTS

An Application for Exemption from Filing certified copy

of the Impugned order

To,

The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India

and His Companion Justice of
Supreme Court of India

The Humber Petition on behalf of the petitioner

above named:

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the petitioner has filed Special Leave Petition

arising out of the Impugned Judgment and final order
dated 22.03.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of
Madhya Pradesh Principal Bench at Jabalpur in W.P.
No. 14162/2019 (D.B.)
 183

2. That the petitioner has applied for the certified copy

of the impugned judgment & order. However, the
same is not yet available and the petitioner,
undertake to file the same as soon as the same is
made available.

PRAYER

It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court

may be pleased to :

(a) Exempt the petitioner from filing certified

copy of the Impugned Judgment and final
order dated 22.03.2022 passed by the Hon’ble
High Court of Madhya Pradesh Principal Bench
at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 14162/2019 (D.B.).
(b) Passed such other or further orders as
this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper
in the facts and circumstances of the case.

Filed by

Filed on : 09.07.2022 PRAVEEN SWARUP

Place : New Delhi Advocate for the petitioner

 184

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
I.A. No. ________/2022
IN
Special Leave Petition (CIVIL.) No. ______/2022

IN THE MATTER OF :

MANOJ KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA ……..PETITIONER

Versus
STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS …….RESPONDENTS

Application for condonation on delay in Re-Filling of

Special Leave Petition

To,
The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India
and His Companion Justice of
Supreme Court of India
The Humber Petition on behalf of
the petitioner above named:
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

3. That the petitioner has filed a Special Leave Petition

arising out of the Impugned Judgment and final order
dated 22.03.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of
Madhya Pradesh Principal Bench at Jabalpur in W.P.
No. 14162/2019 (D.B.).

4. That after scrutiny of the paper books of the e-filling,

of defects were pointed out by the registry.
 185

5. That the petitioners were asked to get the original

record of the case for filing documents and for verifying
some facts stated in the special leave petition.
6. That petitioners did not have the original record and
had to go the High Court advocate for collecting the
original record.
7. That the defects were cured immediately after the
petitioners arrived at the advocate office.
8. That the petitioners could not get the record in time
and delay occurred. The delay is bonafide and
unintentional.
9. That the delay may be condoned in the interest of
justice.
Prayer:-
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble
Court may be graciously pleased to:-
(a) Condone the delay of………days in Re-filling the
Special leave petition filed against the Impugned
Judgment and final order dated 22.03.2022
passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya
Pradesh Principal Bench at Jabalpur in W.P. No.
14162/2019 (D.B.).
(b) Pass such other and further order or orders as
this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in
the facts and circumstance of the present case.

DRAWN ON – 28.11.2022 Filed By;

Filed on : .11.2022
Place : New Delhi PRAVEEN SWARUP
Advocate for the petitioner