Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Progress through
Steel Construction 1. 1
Welded
Part One
Systematic Design of Weldments 1 2 .
1. 3 DESIGN APPROACH
Problem Definition
Designer ' s Guide to
Redesigning by Means of
Equivalent Sections 1. 5
2. 1
Loads and Their Evaluation
Properties of Materials 2. 2
Buckling of Plates 2 . 12
and
DESIGN Feet 4 .5
Flat Containers Cylinders and Shells .6
,
4
of
Design Container
Hangers and Supports
4
7
.
How Design Gear Housings
to
.8
4
Motors and Generators
4
9
.
Design Bearing Supports
10
How
to
4
.
Design Bosses and Pads
11
How
to
4
.
Design Machine Brackets
12
How
to
4
.
Part Five Design Flywheels
to
How
1
.
How Design Pulleys and Sheaves
to
ROTATING MEMBER
2
.
-
to
5
.4 3.
How Design Large Gears
to
5
Weldability Steel
of
;
.1
Part Six
6
Joint Design
2
16 6.
JOINT DESIGN
"
AND Determining Weld Size
.3
PRODUCTION Estimating Welding Costs
.4
6
of
6
5
.
Beam Diagrams and Formulas
7
1
.
Part Seven
Circular Flat Plates
7
2
.
REFERENCE
Torsional Members 7
3
DESIGN FORMULAS .
Frame Diagrams and Formulas 4
7
.
Part Eight
Metric Conversion Factors
8
1
.
MISCELLANEOUS Weights
of
TABLES
SAE Steel Numbering System
8
1
.
1
.
LIST OF SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS
in
=
of of );
-
.?
(
wo
o = normal stress , tensile or compressive (psi ) ; modulus elasticity tension psi
,
=
)
(
strength (psi ) shear psi
Car
modulus elasticity
in
shear stress (psi) ; shear strength (psi)
= = = =
)
(
T = tangential modulus elasticity psi
of
)
(
0 = angle of twist ( radians ; 1 radian = 57. 3 degrees ) ;
kinetic energy
angle of rotation ( radians ); any specified angle potential energy
Gaan
;
= =
)
(
)
(
of
moment inertia
in
(
)
."
section beyond plane where stress polar moment of inertia
of
area
). is
in
=
= =
a
."
)
(
load fatigue
or
plate
of
to
of
in
in
;
?
.
(
/ (
)
or
ft
's ,
(
)
/
of
or
length span between
of
in
ft
=
=
;
;
b
(
.)
.)
of on
gravity supports
of
reference axis
to
to in
in
).
(
(
.)
= =
C
in
.-
(
.)
)
depth applied bending moment lbs
of
of
in
=
= = = =
d
.) (
.)
-
.
(
)
service cycles
of
distance number
in
in
;
(
.)
of (
SEZAGA
=
;
e
of (
)
).
in
;
;
(
.)
(
.)
of
fective width
in
;
(
.)
;
(
.)
/
f
.
(
= =
=
;
.3
1
c
(
/
(
.)
(
)
/
-
.
(
)
(
.)
/
= =
>
).
/
(
;
=
g
)
.4
/
"
?
(
;
=
;
h
in
);
);
=
= =
(
.)
m k
mass
ref
of
's
of
in
;
(
.)
center
= =
= = =
p
.G
C
.
(
of )
.
.)
N
A
s
.
.
(
( .)
=
;
;
(
.)
.)
t
interval sec
(
)
-
SECTION 1 .1
WELDED STEEL DESIGN has advanced far beyond offer outstanding opportunities to improve machine
the weldment shown in Figure 1 . Weldments like this performance and reduce manufacturing costs .
left much to be desired in appearance and cost .
Machine Performance
Use of modern design and fabricating techniques 1 . Greater rigidity and strength increases
would transform the dated weldment of Figure 1 into speed of operation , output and accuracy .
a modern - looking , low - cost weldment . ( A compa
rable , but modern weldment is shown in Fig . 2 .) 2 . Machine can operate under increased loads .
Mechanical flame - cutting equipment now produces 3. Machine can withstand larger overloads .
smooth - cut edges on heavy plate . Many of the
lighter component sections are sheared . 4 . Machine can withstand shock loads .
5 . Machine stays in alignment without depending
Automatic welding and modern electrodes for
onfoundation because of the inherent rigidity of
manual welding , along with positioning equipment,
produce welds of superior appearance and quality at welded steel .
high speeds.
Heavy press brakes and bending rolls are used to
form many of the corners and flanges, so that design
is not limited to the welding together of flat plates . :2
43
WHAT TO EXPECT WITH STEEL Fig . Weldments like this , while accept
1
Steel weldments , efficiently designed to use the able when built , have given way to modern
excellent physical properties of the base material , styled weldments as shown in Figure 2 .
.
1 1– 2 / Design Approach
1 . WHAT THE DESIGNER NEEDS immediate full -scale production by welding . Some
The engineer who is assigned to design a welded
advantages of gradual conversion are the lower
steel base or frame faces many questions related to rate of capitalization and facility change .
its planning and layout, how to select the most effi For companies having their own foundry , grad
cient type of section , how to quickly determine the ual conversion to steel weldments allows them to
dimensions of this section , whether stiffeners slowly curtail the production of castings . Thus ,
should be used , their size and where they should be there needn ' t be any abrupt obsolescence of pre
placed . These and many other practical questions sent facilities . . . or people . The indoctrination of
must be answered if he is to intelligently develop designers and production men into welded construc
an efficient design , taking full advantage of welded tion will be self generating , with confidence growing
steel construction . with experience .
At one time , the practical approach to design Welded steel parts can be used not only in
ing for steel appeared to be that of designing newly built machines , but also as replacement
empirically from past experience . This is easy ; parts for older machines already in the field . This
but unfortunately , the rule - of -thumb selection of may permit a substantial reduction in pattern in
configurations and sections almost invariably re ventory for low - activity parts .
sults in machine members that “ look heavy enough , " Advantages of Designing the Whole Machine as a
but actually are too heavy . This means higher
Completely New Model
material costs , higher fabricating costs , and more
welding than necessary . With this approach the previous design does not
any way restrict the designer . Since casting
Fortunately , this practice has been largely dis in
carded , and today ' s machine designs usually are limitations can be ignored , it is often possible to
based on mathematical calculations . New methods reduce the number of pieces making up the machine
of determining forces and their effects allow de member , thus cutting down the amount of welding
signers to determine sections according to these and over - all assembly time .
calculations . This results in more efficient de In many cases , a single weldment can replace
signs and more efficient use of the many excellent several castings , resulting in a better design at
properties of steel . lower cost . Less machining is required to facil
itate assembly when several pieces are joined to
This handbook offers a sound basis for math
ematical analysis and solution of machine design gether as a single weldment .
problems related to frames , bases , and other weld The total effect is a better opportunity to im
ed steel members . The methods presented here prove appearance and performance , and to reduce
will help by simplifying the use of stress analysis weight and cost . These structural improvements
and the complicated , time - consuming design form can be packaged with an updated power drive system
ulas that must be used . and modern control system to make up a more
through the years until it now represents a good If the steel weldment ' s design is based on a
design functionally . It is disadvantageous in that prior design, the equivalent - rigidity relationships
it channels one ' s thinking in terms of the previous are used . If a new design is based directly on cal
design and blocks any creative thinking toward de culated loading , the design formulas for rigidity
veloping an entirely new concept in solving the are used .
basic problem . Also , any faults in the previous
design tend to be perpetuated . Designing for No Load
The tables of equivalent sections (see Sect . 1 . 5 ) Some parts can be classed as “ no load ” . These
are members expected to serve with practically no
or companion nomographs are used for both strength
and rigidity when the design is based on the previous load and have no specific strength or rigidity re
quirements . Typical no - load designs are gear
design .
guards , covers for access holes , splash and dust
Design Based on Loading Only shields , etc . Such members occasionally present
dicastonaty present
moblem , but medo
a noise problem the solution to this problem
A design on loading allows the de
based only
signer to creative ability to the fullest
use his is not rigidity , nor does it affect the basic design .
extent . There are no preconceived notions from a Noise will be discussed in Sect. 3. 3 on Vibration
previous design to hinder him . It is true that an Control .
extra effort is required to determine the value and
type of load in some cases. It is also necessary to 5 . DESIGN FORMULAS
decide on some value of stress allowable in a
Three factors are always present design
strength design ) or deflection allowable ( in a ri formula . These are :
in a
gidity design ) .
Design 1 . Load
formulas are used for both strength and
rigidity when the design is based on loading only . 2 . Member
3 . Stress and strain
4 . SELECT DESIGN CRITERION
All three of these have a relationship with each
(1 ) Strength only other in any given formula , depending on the type of
load . If any two of these three terms are known , the
(2 ) addition , rigidity
third may be found . Therefore , all problems of
In
GUIDE TO APPLICATION OF
MACHINE DESIGN FORMULAS
I. LOAD
Application Type Value
a. steady a. tension a. force , pounds
b . impact b . compression b . moment , inch - pounds
c. variable c . bending c . torque , inch - pounds
d . torsion
II . MEMBER
Material Section
AND
III
STRESS STRAIN
,
,
,
a
a
.
.
elongation or contraction
,
e
compressive stress vertical deflection
Oc
,
A
b
b
. .
. .
,
,
o
c
IN
IN
7
6
.
.
FORMULAS FORMULAS
The given information about the load not The necessary information about themember
is
is
complete unless the type method application
of
of
,
and the value are fully known and the corresponding property the member sec
of
.
Property material
of
Tension
1
.
.
a
.
in
Torsion
,
strength ,
(
)
,
d
,,
the material
of
some cases
to
to
the yiel
. .
in
all
in
Steady
problems
a
.
Impact
b
.
Variable
.
c
Value
3
.
Force pounds
in
,
a
.
in
=
E
Es
b
.
elasticity
-p
modulus shear
in
=
-
.
. -
1 2 4 / Design Approach
Property
of
Notice that the rigidity of ability
member its abilit
its
section a
2
.
(
resist deflection is meer
) in bending
measured by the
is
The shape and size to
of
member cross section
's
product of its modulus of elasticity ( E ) and its
ints
affect its performance This influence measured modulusending
is
All steels have the same
.
by one several properties moment of of inertia ( I ) .
of
of
the section The ment
.
section area the critical property when the load modulus of elasticity ( E ) ; therefore , it is quickly
is
's
axial seen that a high - strength alloy steel will not improve
or
shear
is
.
the stiffness of a member .
area of cross section
=
A
-
unsupported length
of
member
AND STRAIN FACTORS
=
STRESS
IN
L
8
.
section modulus strength factor when mem DESIGN FORMULAS
=
,
S
ber used as
is
a beam
rigidity
of
or
moment inertia stiffness Stress and strain are given the following
=
in
I
:
torsional resistance Stress
=
R
1
.
performance member predetermined
of
The is
a
tensile stress
0i
=
by the product the appropriate property
of
of of
the
material and the corresponding property compressive stress
Oc
the
=
section Since the engineer designs for strength shear stress
, .
=
T
for rigidity these properties
or
only addition
in
is is
:
a
.
(
which usually expressed as over all
an
Strength Rigidity inch
-
as
movement follows
0X
:
tension tension or
X
A
E
A
(
(
or
or
compression elongation contraction tension
,
e
compression
)
Oc
compression
X
A
(
Es
A
(
,
=
A
ending ending angular twist
01
torsion
E
)
I
=
S
x
,
)
(b
(b
bending
Es
Oc
torsion
R
X
*
S
(
(
LEESBRADNER THE
-
GRANDABO LEESBGADNER
CLEVELAND
DHO
USA
Efficient steel weldments contribute much Castings were dominant earlier version
in
of
profitability
of
.
SECTION .
1 3
Problem Definition
,
economies .
of
section modulus varies the thickness
as
the section
.
LOAD ANALYSIS
2
.
placed
on
,
a
strain result Stress the internal resistance The following problems serve illustrate
is
to
the
to
.
of
.
"
"
or deformation caused by de
as
up
,
2
a
tion torsion
in
in
,
on
.
Now
it
it
,
,
a
a
.
The property of the section which indicates how necessary extend the length this boom because
to
well the member serves as for strength the larger tanks being fabricated
of
beam
,
a
.
of
is of ,
up
the member serves about under this load Even though there
is
,
1
8
a
.
"
its moment inertia The formulas below show no known horizontal force applied
he
this beam
of
to
of ,
.
of (
I)
that the moments inertia for two designs of assumes this could possibly reach about the
1
4
/
in
.
.
(
)
.
. -
1 3 2 / Design Approach
Fig . 2 A long cantilever beam carrying a welding head on the unsupported end is
subjected to little horizontal force ; yet actual vibration from service conditions may
cause more movement in the horizontal direction than the vertical .
The result is a simple box section , deeper than izontal x - x axis ( Ix ). If the speed of travel of
it is wide. Now , how does this perform ? welding is not too great, the welding head will
automatically adjust vertically to maintain constant
When the welding head is mounted onto the end
arc length . There is no such control for horizontal
of the new boom , the boom deflects downward 1 / 8 " ,
vibrations .
and there it will remain for the next 20 years until
it is replaced or moved to another location . During Perhaps the real design problem here is to
the operation of the welding head , the fixture may maintain proper stiffness against possible move
vibrate slightly , perhaps from being accidentally ment of the boom , which is greatest in the hor
bumped by the operator , perhaps from a crane izontal direction . This might result in a different
passing overhead and shaking the building frame section of boom than previously designed . It
work . At any rate , this boom will probably vibrate would probably look like the original cross - section
a greater distance horizontally than vertically , be ( Fig . 2 ) rotated 90° on its longitudinal centerline .
cause the moment of inertia about the vertical y - y
* *
axis ( Iy ) is much less than that about the hor
M = KPL, oS where
M
=
beam constant
=
K
therefore
:
moment
M
=
OS KPL
=
load
=
P
length
of
beam
=
L
bending stress
):
(
=
o
Ki
L2
P2
01
01
S2
K2
Si
=
=
P
section modulus
L
.
=
=
c
S
)
(
I/
for
or
equivalent strength
,
-
01
02
S2
Si
=
in
KPL where
EI
-
A
deflection
= =
E A
A
(
)
)
L23 :
(
)
Ki K2
of
E2P2
moment
Li Li
Li3 inertia
m
=
K
.
n
P
A
_
=_
..
I
A2
Ei
Iz
for
equivalent rigidity
or
Ei ,
–
Ez
12
I1
=
Problem Definition / 1 .3 - 3
211
- 1.2 " —
Section WINTTINNIT
property
t = .06 "
1. 4
.
0 44
0. 26
the
Fig . 3 When the distance neutral axis the outer fiber increases faster
to
from
than the resulting moment of inertia the section modulus trength decreases
.
(s
Usually the designer interested much
as
most cases when given section beefed
in
is
is
In
"
up
strength and stiffness as he can economically ob
of
increase its stiffness moment inertia
to
,
,
”
I)
tain Yet the design problem properly de its strength will automatically increase section
if
is
,
(
.
fined certain amount of flexibility may have modulus that the engineer seldom checks the
so
to
,
,
a
S
)
be designed into the member For example some resulting section modulus There are exceptions
,
.
.
parts farm implements must have some flexibility
of
Figure
example stiff
of
the the addition
In
,
4
usage
up
to
of
.
(
the plate
of
For engineer has designed
example simple ness yet the section
an
134
of ;
A
,
(
)
a
flat bar Under load has modulus strength only 67 the plate The
is
beam from
%
it
,
4
2
a
.
(
)
of 1/
.
"
"
deflection He believes this should be reason for this very simple yet quite often
is
0016
is
,
a
, .
.
so "
made stronger he designs formed channel overlooked Section modulus equal the
is
to
S
a
of .
(
)
“
"
section from gage steel Under the same load moment inertia divided by the distance from
16
I()
. -
deflects only 0012 This appears be sub the neutral axis the outer fiber
to
to
it
c
(
).
.
"
for
;
flat
to
dentally overloaded The distance the outer fiber the
the engineer surprised
)
(c
is
to
,
"
. of
of
instead the
,
a
“
"
properties
of
section
a
ha
The property
of
MI
a
is
.
(
I)
YŤ
in
S
(
).
SV
,
-
a
16
see Figure Therefore the redesign has
KV
of
D
B
"
,
;
3
4
/
"
1
3
.
Moment
a
Section Relative
gage dial make the measurement depended only
to
Weight
of
,
of
the original
of
of
times that
an
39 38
,
1
.4
A
I
34
67
05
B
.5
1
.
,
A
.
.
"
on "
67
34
an
of
of
44 that the
-
=
=
.
1
1
S
buckling
of
Thus
In
,
be
.
contrast the bending stress the original flat bar section modulus strength may lowered
in
)
,
was held much below the yield point and that mem when section redesigned for increased
is
a
,
of
moment
.
(
)
.
. -
1 3 4 / Design Approach
plate is one - half of the plate thickness , or 3 / 8 " . By in turn would decrease the inertia forces and reduce
the addition of 3 / 8 " high stiffeners to each side of the lever ' s deflection . They carried this to the point
the plate , this distance (c ) is doubled ; yet the mo of ordering a new lever made of aluminum for
ment of inertia has increased to only 134 % that of testing . At this point, one of the men took his
the original plate . The point to remember is this : handbook and showed the following :
any time the distance to the outer fiber increases
at a faster rate than the resulting moment of inertia , - KF 13 ma
the section modulus (strength ) will always be lower . ΕΙ and F =
be lower than the yield strength , the stiffener would a = acceleration or deceleration
have no opportunity to yield , but would crack when
E = modulus of elasticity (tension )
this fatigue strength and stress were reached . This
particular member with the stiffeners ( B ) , under I = moment of inertia
these conditions , would be weaker . If some brittle length
L =
material were used , for example cast iron , this
particular member with the stiffeners ( B ) would be Since :
weaker than that with no stiffeners (A ) because the
density of steel = 7 9 .
material does not have the ability to yield .
density of aluminum = 2 .8
MATERIAL SELECTION
of steel
3
~ 106
.
E = 30
step selecting the right material and using its inserting the ratios of these values ( steel to alumi
is
properties effectively To achieve effective use the num ) into the above deflection formula :
.
)
)1(
30
of
if
03
Aal Asi
=
more rigid
.
in
a
base Company engineers were surprised ob Thus the aluminum lever designed for equiv
to
,
.
serve they all had the same deflection under the alent rigidity would actually have resulted de
in
a
same load
03
of
of
1
.
.
(
of
.)
elasticity therefore the same rigidity by redesign the steel lever and not by sub
of
and
.
Another
ficulty with Steel has greater strength than any other com
at
speeds The engineers reasoned the problem mercially available material still more section
in
a
If
.
very logical manner The actual load strength required higher strength alloy steel
on
this lever
is
,
.
was very low the forces being due mainly inertia may be used instead con
of
struction steels
,
or deceleration
Steel has greater rigidity
or
.
in
is
.
's
Problem Definition / 1. 3 – 5
of elasticity . Figure 5 illustrates the relative stiff than a corresponding section of aluminum or
ness of several commercial metals . All samples magnesium , provided the steel section can have the
have the same section and are loaded so that all same depth .
deflect the same amount . The relative weights on Since aluminum ' s modulus elasticity is only
the samples indicate how the materials differ in 34 . 4 % that of steel , it requires
of
a moment of is
of inertia
their stiffness or modulus of elasticity . 2 . 9 times that of steel or a a sesi
moment
sectional area approxi
or
Even though aluminum and magnesium are light
er than steel, their moduli of elasticity are less
ly 2 9 . that of steel for equivalent rigid
times steel
mately 2 . 9 times
ity . With a density 35 . 4 % that of steel , the alumi
than that of steel by a greater ratio . Aluminum has num section would have an over - all weight of 1 . 03
a density 35 . 4 % that of steel , yet its modulus of times that of steel .
elasticity is only 34 . 4 % of steel ' s . Magnesium has weight for weight , mild steel is
Conclusion :
a density of 22 . 8 % that of steel , but a modulus of
still the lightest , most economical metal for equiv
elasticity only 21 . 6 % of steel ' s . A steel section - -
alent rigidity .
for the same stiffness or rigidity - - will weigh less
- CAST
BRONZE
IRON
MAGNESIUM
STEEL
ALUMINUM
stiffnessvarious materials
5
.
.
.
1 3 –6 / Design Approach
all
.
SECTION 1. 4
The efficient use of steel in machinery calls (14 ) Control and correction of distortion
for many design decisions - - some major , some Cleaning
( 15 ) and inspection
minor . Experienced designers who produce suc
cessful designs follow a definite sequence in doing Some of these guideposts refer to manufacturing .
so . Many decisions are proposed , accepted or re These are important to the designer in evaluating
jected subconsciously . The process is essentially the producibility of a proposed design , and in con
the same as that involved in the creative design of tributing more fully to product planning sessions .
any product or component . Questions to ask in connection with each of these
check points are given on following pages .
This section presents the major design and
fabrication considerations in an easily - followed
sequence . The sequence will serve both as an TV List No . 1 OGNITION OF PROBLEM
introduction as well as later reference for the young
engineer , or the more experienced engineer who 1. Is this an entirely new machine , or a redesign
hasn ' t yet had the opportunity to use steel or weld of a present machine ?
ments extensively in structural members ofmach
inery . The sequence is presented as a series of If a redesign problem , should the conversion
2.
to steel be made a part at a time or the entire mach
checklists that constitute a practical systems ap
ine designed as a whole new approach to meeting the
proach to designing for maximum economy and the
basic requirements ?
best functional designs producible under given
manufacturing conditions . 3 . What are the primary and secondary func
tions of the proposed machine ?
4 . Relate every detail of existing and proposed
TO
'S
.
to
OF
No
List
or
cable time
to
de
a
signing the entire machine the machine larger heavier more rigid
Is
,
1
.
.
of
or
Recognition
of
the problem
the de
(1
do
What
to
2
.
Analysis the present design mand for replacement parts Examine any available
of
(2
)
Major design considerations some respects while other members may need
to
in
,
(4
)
up
Layout be beefed
.
(5
)
Plate preparation
to 3
.
(6
)
it
,
Welded
.
of
subassemblies market
of of
Use
.
(
Use fixtures
,
is
,
?
it
(
)
?
. -
1 4 2 / Design Approach
2
.
of
stiffeners and
Thesestiffeners closed sections
ri
as
not effective
resisting increase the
in
of
in
frame approximatelyequal
to
of
Torsionalresistance
is
of
of
with completefreedom
in
may used
BEST GOOD
Closedsectionsbestfor resistingtorsion Round
,
.
|
is
In
,
a
of
able
to
to
a
.
constant cross reference frequently generates new
-
's
and cost
.
,
-
he
HIGH
or
to
formance
,
;
careful consideration insure maximum design Fig Shroud bands and nozzle vanes are
to
3
.
.
Design should satisfy strength and stiffness
diagonal bracing for
1
.
extra
in
,
A
(
).
open section
an
.
2
(
.
.
).
rience set
is
10
unnecessary expense
-
.
too high
at
Specify appearance required Appearance alloy steels require preheating and frequently
,
3
.
for its own sake usually increases cost more than postheating which are added cost items
,
of
11
not likely
.
to
quired
of
Fig
-
.
).
.
check
to
If
as
.
in
wide
,
,
a
being used
as the lower priced mild steels
.
13
If
-
.
.
(
tance
to
-
-
)
6
.
resistance bending terial are needed consider using mild steel base
,
to
to
beams rigid
of
4
.
.
(
the use
will provide rigid
.
of
Proper use stiffeners sections Fig These require less forming and
8
.
5
.
.
ity
.
).
.
. -
1 4 4 / Design Approach
08
VUU
INI 1111111
UN
CUA
011111
10
1111111
111
00012
11107
000
000
162
WMN
NIMIZ
Designer 's Guide to Efficient Use of Steel / . -
1 4 5
- --
- --
--
finish 2 finish it
By using a 2" thick bar,
In some typesof steel, the
/8 top
/8 be
next larger thickness this surfacemay finished
off
with only
to
available is 2 1/ 4" , this machined
1
7
1
"
"
.
would require 1/ 4" tobe
machinedoff
is
6
.
List LAYOUT
. 3.
economically hold
.
V
!
5
to
the designer familiar only with castings the Close tolerances and fits may not be
To
,
them
.
problems laying out weldment for production
of
required
a
.
may seem complex because the many possibil
is of
of
ties This variety however welded de
of
8
one
)
.
.
.
,
welding
for savings
.
.
or of
to
for
of
and
1
.
to
so
for inexpensive
,
tooling
scrap Fig
.
9
.
.
(
)
Check with shop for ideas where shop
ex
2
.
of
perience can contribute and size
or
,
better methods
If
6
cost
to
be
so
savings cutouts
this before firming design
Do
parts
.
,
,
,
.
:
Fig
If 10
(
)
.
is
to
7
-
-
.
(a
a
)
:
plate flame cut developed blank size and then
to
-
(c
)
-
the economy which will depend
of
shape section
,
ODOOD
PreviousDesign Improved
21
Pieces
Pieces
3
.
. -
1 4 6 / Design Approach
HALCU
9.
eliminate extensive cutting from plate , machining ,
and loss of material (Fig . 12 ).
No
IV
List PLATE PREPARATION
6
.
Cutting the basic step fabricating weld
is
in
a
ment Many different methods are available and
,
.
the most economical will be determined by balanc
ing several factors material section quality re
,
:
-
-
-
quired and equipment available The decision
is
,
.
generally one economy
of
.
Consider the proper method producing
of
1
.
weldment blanks as which most economical
to
is
,
for the quantity and quality required principally
:
Flame cutting
(a
Lay out sections they can
so
-
be
Shearing
(b
)
Free
Sawing
c
(
)
this
d
(
)
looola
Nibbling
Open
up
(e
)
Open
up
)
Factor into the above evaluation the influ
,
2
.
quality
of
p and
on
of
method
fit
ence edge for
-u
for
Fig Good design makes possible whether method can also provide bevel required
it
if
9
.
)
production for groove joints
of
for
Fig Plan
10
.
sections
be
to
stiffeners
or
,
less welding
C
reducescrap loss
to
to
useinner disc
Designer 's Guide to Efficient Use of Steel / 1. 4 - 7
.
Consider whether dimensioning re
of
blank
3
.
of
edge
and groove
.
plate prepara
or
tip-
-
.
of
13
corner can often save
-
,
V
6
.
- -
-
.
tip
use multiple
so
-
of
plate planer
of or
available thick plate Consider arc air gouging flame gouging
is
is
,
If
7
,
a
.
-
.
chipping instead
U
,
a
J
-
requires less weld metal machining bevel both edges prior welding
to
to
it
.
kumu
AU
Fig Efficient
12
.
by
--
-
F
if
,
on up
by
compositesections welding
to
Build cut
down machiningand material costs
produced fromlaminations
of
IV List NoFORMING AND SPECIAL 4 . Determine whether there would be any saving
7
.
by forming round or square tubes or rings , instead
SECTIONS
of buying commercial tubing .
The second major step fabricating weldment
in
a
generally forming The proper use forming Put bend in flat plate sections
of
5. to increase
is
.
can greatly reduce the cost weldment by elim
, of
stiffness ( Fig . 15 ) .
a
inating welds and very often numerous machining
,
operations Several factors determine the best
.
method
is ,
. -
, :
Fig
Flange
15
on
the final factor
.
flat
.
plate
Consider using the following forming increases
1
.
stiffness
methods
.
:
Press brake
a
(
)
Bending rolls
b
(
)
Roll forming
c
(
)
-b
-
(f
a
.
up
to
in
Fig
13
6
.
of adding needed stiffeners
(
).
to
Consider possible saving rolling ring Fib
16
in
3
a
.
.
(
)
cutting from plate Fig
of
14
instead
up
stiffener by bending of
.
.
(
a
.
a
sheet before welding the next sheet Fig
17
to
it
.
(
)
Fig Roll rings Consider using corrugated sheet for extra
14
8
.
.
a
.
forging complicated
or
a
section will simplify the design problem and cost
of
manufacture
.
Fig
18
Use minimum
.
in
al
Shaded areas
.
dicate amount of
weld metal
daha
added
Concave Convex 45° flat .
Automatic welding
K
&
Manual Automatic
Fig . 16 Press in
dentation in flat
pane I increases
stiffness .
V List No . 8 ) WELDED JOINT DESIGN 3 . Use minimum root opening and included angle
in order to reduce filler metal required (Fig . 18 ,
The type of joint should be selected primarily on
top left ) .
the basis of load requirements . Once , however , the
type is selected , variables in design and layout can 4. On thick plate , use double - V instead of single
result in startling cost reductions or cost increases . V to reduce the amount ofweld metal ( Fig . 18 , left) .
1. Select joint requiring a minimum amount of 5 . Sometimes a single weld may be used to join
weld filler metal . three parts (Fig . 18 , bottom left ).
2 . Eliminate beveling on a large percentage of 6 . Reduce the convexity of fillet welds . A 45°
n= =
=
-- ==
--
Fig . Design must =
19 =
allow access to joint =
--
for welding . >
Try avoid placing pipe joints
to
so
Easy specify
to
- D
"
the
--
--
-
-
to
--
to
Easy
Wall
Very difficult
. -
1 4 10 / Design Approach
flat fillet , very slightly convex , is the most economi nished . The allowables used by the designer have a
cal and reliable shape (Fig . 18 , top right ) . built - in safety factor . Don ' t add still another safety
joints that create extremely deep factor .
7 . Avoid
grooves . The joint formed by the meeting of a 3. The leg size of fillet welds is especially im
portant , since the area or amount of weld fill re
Outubing
or ,
round or tubing with a flat surface of another round
tubing , is one example . This presents two pro
is one quired increases as the square of the increase in leg
cedure problems ; getting
getting proper fusion to the root size .
pro
and not burning through the thin wall while filling
thin wal
4 . Always make certain in manual welding that
the joint with weld metal ( Figure 18 ) . you do not specify a 3 / 8 " horizontal fillet if a 5 / 16 "
8 . Design joint for easy accessibility for weld fillet will do . The 3 / 8 " horizontal fillet requires at
ing ( Fig . 19 ) . Consider availability of welding least two passes to guarantee size with a 44 % in
positioners . crease in cost (Fig . 20 , top left ) .
5 . For equivalent strength , longer fillet welds
having a smaller leg size are usually less costly
V List No . 9 WELD SIZE AND AMOUNT than heavy intermittent welds (Fig . 18 , top right ) .
Overwelding is easy to do and difficult to control . Joint length may influence the relationship .
It can be very costly and , unfortunately , it is a
6. Sometimes , especially under light - load or
common error of both design and production . Con
no - load conditions , intermittent fillet welds can be
trol begins with design , butmust be carried through
used in place of a continuous weld of the same leg
out the assembly and welding operations . The fol
lowing are basic guides : size , thus reducing cost (Fig . 20 , center right) .
7. Convert several short manual welds into one
Be sure to use the proper amount of welding - -
1.
continuous weld for automatic welding .
not too much and not too little . Excessive weld size
is costly . 8. Place the weld in the section with the least
Specify by print or Standard Shop Practice thickness , and base the weld size on the thinner plate .
2.
that only the needed amount of weld should be fur 9 . Place the weld on the shortest seam . If there
44% more
22222 One - half the
weld metal
weld metal - Twice the
only 20% Gauge samestrength
weld metal -
stronger r concave
welds samestrength
W
forBig
Gauge
convex welds
<
<
W
<
<
<
<
<
Measuringsize CONVEX
of
<
&
<
<
in
both cases
=
3
"8
/
of
hole automatic
welding
of
Location
cut out hole
-
for
manual
welding
be
is
.
.
- --
No
| No . List ASSEMBLY
12
V List 10 USE OF SUBASSEMBLIES
.
oil rust dirt before welding
of
visualizing assembly procedure , the designer Clean work
,
1
In
.
should break the proposed machine down into sub reduce troubles
to
.
assemblies several different ways to determine Determine any need for preheat interpass
,
2
which , if any , will offer some of the following cost
.
and postheat temperatures not normally required
;
savings :
for welding the mild steels commonly used
in
1. Spreads work out, if machine structure is machinery construction Low ydrogen electrodes
-h
large or complex . More men can work on whole job . will reduce any preheat requirements
.
This means shorter delivery time . The need for preheat may affect numerous
3
.
tooling loading
for
up
2 . Usually provides better access welding decisions relative
fit
etc
to
,
-
.
.
up
Reduces the possibility lock fit Improve necessary Gaps
of
or
distortion Check
if
4
-
.
.
3
up.
if
.
-
were tacked together and then completely welded Clamp position and hold during welding
.
into
5
.
.
Precision welding possible with modern
Use jigs and fixtures hold parts with proper
4
.
to
techniques permits machining
- 6
close tolerances
up.
to
to
and
before welding into final assembly
.
.
contraction
to
if
7
.
.
5
-
.
.
6
.
chambers and painting before welding into final Weld two similar members back back
to
9
-
-
.
assembly
with some prebend
.
10
need
-
.
If
-
-
List No
up
end
V
.
|
Jigs fixtures
and welding positioners should be Use strongbacks
11
,
In
12
sequence move
to
in
as
jig
aid
in
if
is
1
.
be
is
to
in
welding
or jig
,
on
Determine be mounted
.
to
if
is
the welding
2
each can be
.
of
natural sections
so
,
dimensions
.
so
,
member
4
.
.
1 4 . - 12 / Design Approach
of
in
| v List No . 13 WELDING PROCEDURE will the most good
do
where This reduces weld
it
.
These checkpoints are primarily for guidance of metal being deposited
.
weld shop personnel . Control of cost and quality, groove welds watch reinforcement
15
On
Pro
,
though , is a mutual concern of both Design and
T
-
.
.
Most unnecessary for full strength joint
, of
is
it
duction . The designer must be concerned with what
-
ig lower left
14
goes on in the shop , and the production man must
).
(F
see that his experience is passed back to the de the best ways
of
save money
16
One
to
to
is
.
signer . Thus : prevent before they happen repairs due crack
to
,
,
ing porosity etc which result from poor welding
,
. Use good weldable steel .
.
1
procedures
.
2. Try to improve operating factor ; use weldor
portion
of
unrestrained
17
Weld toward the
helpers, , .
.
good fixtures and handling equipment
member
.
3 . Deposit the greatest amount of filler metal
first those joints that may have great
18
Weld
the shortest possible time.
.
in
as
est contraction they cool
.
4. Use backup bars to increase speed of weld
Distribute the welding heat
as
uniformly
as
19
the first pass , for groove joints .
.
ing on
possible throughout the member
.
Eliminate or reduce preheat by using low
5.
21 20
Use procedure which eliminates arc blow
a
hydrogen
.
electrodes .
Use optimum welding current and speed for
6 . Be sure welding machines and cable are
.
best welding performance
job
.
.
Be
22
electrode holder that allows the use
an
Use
is .
appearance
7
no
.
distortion
is
If
high welding current
of
,
Use manual electrodes down stub exceeded
to
8
2
a
"
.
Weld
if
in
9
.
.
vertical welds are more expensive use the type electrode that will pro
of
Overhead certain
to
and
.
.
10
in
,
If
.
of
24
to
sheet metal 45° downhill
-
.
Weld
11
.
.
,
12
a
Consider welding from one side only
.
to if
both sides
,
overwelding
)
larger
or
at
Investigate electrodes
26
higher currents
With automatic welding position fillet welds
13
.
,
.
obtain greater penetration into the root Use semi automatic full automatic weld
or
of
27
the
to
-
.
of
30° from horizontal its
:
Fig
21
and vertical plate 60° from horizontal deeper penetration and uniform deposit
.
.
(
For fillet welds loaded transversely posi Be especially careful specifying weld
14
size
28
,
.
horizontal
so
).
for samepenetrationand
IV No
14
in
this penetration
a
:
.
penetrationwhich automatic
,
1
.
effective welding
is
2
.
3
to
.
Designer 's Guide to Efficient Use of Steel / . - 13
1 4
5. Take advantage of deeper penetration with have uniform appearance ; therefore , do not grind
automatic welding . the surface of the weld smooth or flush unless re
6 . Welding should progress toward the unres quired for another reason . This is a very costly
trained portion of themember but backstepping may
operation and usually exceeds the cost of welding .
be practical as welding progresses . 2 . Reduce cleaning time by use of powdered
7 . Balance the welds about the neutral axis of
iron electrodes and automatic welding which mini
member ; that is , position welds opposite each other , mize spatter and roughness of surface .
preferably equidistant from the neutral axis . 3. Spatter films can be applied parallel to the
joint , to reduce spatter sticking to the plate . Some
8 . On double - V joints , weld alternately on both
electrodes and processes produce little or no
sides of plate . spatter .
9 . Flame shrink when advisable .
4. Eliminate as many welding difficulties as
10 . Avoid buckling in section due to improper possible so as to reduce the amount of inspection
handling or support . needed .
11 . Avoid buckling due to poor choice or per Perhaps a slightly reduced welding speed or
5.
formance of flame - cutting , shearing or other plate a lower welding current will minimize weld faults
preparation process . and inspection . Result might be lower repair costs ,
for
-
.
to
flushweld Cornerwill melt
V
't
up
requiring large amounts one passunlessbacked
of
through
through especially with Copper
,
on
weld Thesewelds look good drawing
but are tough make
to
one
in
is
throughthin metal
be
piece underneath
for backing
to
fill Easy
-
50
%
Less than
Burnsthrough Safe when gap
is
60
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
60
About
is
be
no
angles pipe
.
. - 14 / Design Approach
1 4
Welded headstock for wood turning Lathe headstock was welded up from
lathe was manufactured at half the 11 pieces - - low - cost stampings and
cost of earlier cast iron unit . flat bars .
SECb -b
Secb - t
SECTION .
1 5
Redesigning by Means of
Equivalent Sections
1. THE EQUIVALENT - SECTIONS CONCEPT valent Tables since each applies to only a specific
type of design problem . They eliminate most or all
Although is preferable in most cases to de
it
direct mathematical calculations and enable the
sign a machinethe basis of calculated loading , at
on
user to find graphically actual dimensions of the
times an engineer desires to convert from a casting
steel member . However , they tend to restrict the
or a forging to fabricated steel in the simplest way
designer to the existent casting ' s configuration .
possible .
The Lincoln I Rule supplements the Equivalent
The Equivalent Sections concept is aimed at this
Tables in simplifying the solution of rigidity designs .
direct conversion from one material to another .
Possibly a single member or assembly will be rede It is especially helpful in finding the moment of
signed for steel and must be functional within an inertia ( I ) of the original casting cross - section . See
Sec . 2. 3 for a more detailed description on the use
over - all machine design still based on cast iron . Or, of this I rule .
the decision may be to lean heavily on the plant ' s
casting experience and pretty much duplicate the Application of each of these three design aids is
original machine in steel rather than go into stress discussed in the following paragraphs , using actual
analysis . Or, the need may be to convert from one design problems for illustration .
steel design to another in order to take advantage of
new manufacturing techniques . 2 . USE OF EQUIVALENT TABLES
The basic 3 - step approach to converting a cast Here again are the basic 3 steps to converting a
ing into a steel weldment by means of equivalent casting into a steel weldment by means of equivalent
sections is this : sections :
STEP 1 : Determine the Type of Loading Under STEP 1: Determine the Type of Loading Under the
Requirements of Strength or Rigidity Requirements of Strength or Rigidity for Each
for Each Member . Member
STEP 2: Determine the Critical Property of All parts of a structure must have basic jobs to
this Cast Member do :
STEP 3: Determine the Required Property for 1. Maintain sufficient strength or , in addition ,
the Steel Member rigidity .
Three aids have been developed to simplify an 2 . Withstand loads applied in tension , compres
engineer ' s taking this design approach . They are : sion , bending , or torsion .
1. Tables of Equivalent Strength and Rigidity STEP 2: Determine the Critical Properties of the
Factors Cast Member
2 . Nomographs , for Specific Types of Members The ability of the part to withstand the above
loadings is measured by certain properties of its
3 . The Lincoln I Rule , for Rigidity Problems
cross - section . These are :
The Equivalent Tables were developed from a
simplification of traditional engineering formulas . A = Area of the cross - section
The tables permit the designer to be concerned only I of inertia ,
for
=
with an appropriate property of the section . He
Section modulus for flexural strength
doesn ' t have to work directly with design loads which
,
=
S
formulas . twisting
Nomographs further shorten the design process . Polar section modulus for strength under
,
-
J
In one respect , they are more limited than the Equi torsion
C
. -
1 4 14 / Design Approach
Welded headstock for wood turning Lathe headstock was welded up from
lathe was manufactured at half the 11 pieces - - low - cost stampings and
cost of earlier cast iron unit . flat bars .
SEC
Secb
for
.
.
SECTION .
1 5
Redesigning by Means of
Equivalent Sections
1. THE EQUIVALENT - SECTIONS CONCEPT valent Tables since each applies to only a specific
type of design problem . They eliminate most or all
Although it is preferable in most cases to de
sign a machine on the basis of calculated loading , at direct mathematical calculations and enable the
user to find graphically actual dimensions of the
times an engineer desires to convert from a casting
steel member . However , they tend to restrict the
or a forging to fabricated steel in the simplest way
designer to the existent casting ' s configuration .
possible .
The Lincoln I Rule supplements the Equivalent
The Equivalent Sections concept is aimed at this
Tables in simplifying the solution of rigidity designs .
direct conversion from one material to another .
It is especially helpful in finding the moment of
Possibly a single member or assembly will be rede
inertia ( I) of the original casting cross - section . See
signed for steel and must be functional within an
Sec . 2 . 3 for a more detailed description on the use
over -all machine design still based on cast iron . Or,
of this I rule .
the decision may be to lean heavily on the plant ' s
casting experience and pretty much duplicate the Application of each of these three design aids is
original machine in steel rather than go into stress discussed in the following paragraphs , using actual
analysis . Or, the need may be to convert from one design problems for illustration .
steel design to another in order to take advantage of
new manufacturing techniques . 2 . USE OF EQUIVALENT TABLES
The basic 3 - step approach to converting a cast Here again are the basic 3 steps to converting a
ing into a steel weldment by means of equivalent casting into a steel weldment by means of equivalent
sections is this : sections :
STEP 1: Determine the Type of Loading Under STEP 1: Determine the Type of Loading Under the
Requirements of Strength or Rigidity Requirements of Strength or Rigidity for Each
for Each Member . Member
STEP 2: Determine the Critical Property of All parts of a structure must have basic jobs to
this Cast Member do :
STEP 3 : Determine the Required Property for 1. Maintain sufficient strength or , in addition ,
the Steel Member rigidity .
Three aids have been developed to simplify an 2. Withstand loads applied in tension , compres
engineer ' s taking this design approach . They are : sion , bending , or torsion .
1 . Tables of Equivalent Strength and Rigidity STEP 2 : Determine the Critical Properties of the
Factors Cast Member
2 . Nomographs, for Specific Types of Members The ability of the part to withstand the above
loadings is measured by certain properties of its
3 . The Lincoln I Rule , for Rigidity Problems
cross - section . These are :
The Equivalent Tables were developed from a
simplification of traditional engineering formulas . A = Area of the cross - section
The tables permit the designer to be concerned only I = Moment of inertia , for resistance to bending
with an appropriate property of the section . He ,
Section modulus for flexural strength
doesn ' t have to work directly with design loads which
S =
would be the case when using the traditional J = Polar moment of inertia , for resistance to
formulas . twisting
Nomographs further shorten the design process . J Polar section modulus , for strength under
In one respect , they are more limited than the Equi C torsion
. -
1 5 2 / Design Approach
Step 1
TABLE 1
Determine the Type of Loading
RIGIDITY short
compression
long
tension column column bending torsion
Step 2 Area
Polar
Area Moment of Moment of Moment
Determine this property Inertia Inertia of Inertia
of the cast member .
Step 3
Multiply the above property of the cast member by the
following factor to got the equivalent value for steel . *
EQUIVALENT FACTORS
TABLE 1 - EQUIVALENT
Grey Iron A STM 20 40 % 40 % 40 % 40 % 40 %
ASTM 30 50 50 50 50 50
ASTM 40 _
50 69 63 63
RIGIDITY FACTORS
ASTM 50 67 67 67 67 67
ASTM 60 70 70 70 70 70
Meebanite Grade GE _ 40 40 40 9
Grade GD 48 48 48 48 48
Grade GC 57 57 57 57 57
Grade GB 60 60 60 60 60
Grade GA 67 67 67 67 67
Magnesium Alloys 22 22 22 22 20
Aluminum Alloys 34 34 34 32
subscript '
" g 18 for steel ; " C" 1s for casting
STEP 1:
Fy
As - 40 % Aco
Each member is labeled as to the type of load As = %. 2 ive
ing to which it is subject , Figure 2 .
- - - - -Card
POYAU
APPLIED FORCE
-
ENSION Is = 40 % Io
Is 3 .60 in
LJS =40 % JC,
js =. 62 IN
Is = 90 % Ic ,
Is = . 268 ing
BENDING TORSION
FIGURE 4
L
its
.
member does job
62
,
3
.
in
y
.
s
.
.
lcze
BAR
APPLIED FORCE
O
FLAT
11N
65 int
10
AREA ACI
.
3
-
.
FIGURE
5
o
MERDA
3
.
MOMENT
Ici int
=
1,
OF
5
POLAR type
of
of to
L
of
INERTIA JCI
=
1
6
,
.
of
how
a
MOMENT INERTIA
Section concept
Ic 67
.
=
?
,
of 6,
"
is
FIGURE
It
6
x
.
"
"
3
STEP
3
:
These
multiplied by the equivalent factors from Table
1
.
4
.
Final Design
:
6
.
. -
1 5 4 / Design Approach
of
iron .
It has one rib underneath and under bending load
.
For purpose of comparison , cost will
its
681 lbs .
Critical Property
of
STEP Determine the the
be considered equal
2
:
to
100
%
Cast Member
.
STEP Determine the Type Loading
of
rigidity design the member must have
1
:
In
,
a
which motor and pump are resist bending
of
This cast base sufficient moment inertia
on
to
,
a
I()
mounted was acceptable service Equal or bet load Where the shape the cross section as well
of
in
,
re
-
.
ter rigidity an essential objective the redesign as the length and depth
of
the member are
in
is
to
for welded steel The design problem thus one main the same will be accurate enough within
is
it
,
.
(
Step
1
TABLE the Type Loading
2
of
Determine
compression
STRENGTH short
tension column bending torsion
Polar
Step Area Area
Section
Section
2
Modulus
Determine this property
Modulus TABLE EQUIVALENT
2
-
of
STRENGTH FACTORS
Multiply the above property mem
of
the cast
Step ber by the following factor get the equiva
to
3
EQUIVALENT FACTORS
40 30 20
21
21
Gray Iron 94 28
%
ASTM %
ASTM 31 123 31 42
ASTM 42 136 42 56
ASTM 50 52 156 52 70
ASTM 60 63 167 63 83
68 68
33
A47 33 32510 54 54 70
-
57 199 57
75
75
75
10
20
Cast Steel
37 33 75
%
C
-
(.
Magnesium lloy 50 50 50
, T6
AZ63 HTA
, ,
, ,
,
C H
- -a
T6
Aluminum 195 T4 40 40 43
5 7 5 0 0
5 2 5 7 5 0 0
3 6 6 0 0 3
5 2 5 7 5 0 0
. . , . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . .
T7 T6 T7 T6 T4 T6
Sand 45 45 45 50
Castings 220 57 57 57 55
355 43 43 43 46
42 41 47
46
47
47
356 41 41 43
.42 .2
40
42
0
5
.
°C
=
1
0
;
C
s
"
"
"
"
of
using safety factor for mild steel and from for the cast materials depending
to
3
4
.8
a
upon ductility
.
Redesigning by Means of Equivalent Sections / 1.5 - 5
)
The minimum thickness of the top and side
to
Casting Steel
Thickness
of
Casting Thickness
of Steel
16625
156a
.
of
Type 1462
Casting 1362
.
2
126a
.
Ga
Il
.
IOGA
96
ytop plate
z1
Mg allosas
.
alloys
Al
mit
---
CGE
.
---
20
GO
)piate
side
SIM
4
.
Malleable
ordinary
+
Melleable STEEL
ASTM 32510
casting
ĘE
steel casting
t
'
t
*
• Eo
thickness
t
of 20
Example Grey Ne
98
Iron thick
,
:
Find thickness
AS3
NP
Construct
to
-
'
'8
des
:
"
"
. -
1 5 6 / Design Approach
panels
of
the steel member can be read from the
first nomograph Figure nomograph
On
this
Oog
,
:
.
Line casting panel
of
known thickness
=
A
of
= cast
B
of
to
=
C
to
lbs
ponding cast panel Fig Welded Steel
10
Base 281
)
to on
15
stiffeners centers
straight edge laid along the point
"
Line
on
With
of
a
is
of
thickness
A
1
"
34
30
indicating the ASTM for one for ten
%
the point Line
20
,
on
cast
.6
9
.
B
is
the
of
30
3 52 span
8
the
.
"
/
in
,
required thickness of the steel top panel sim
"
ing that required
In
span the steel member
15
in
.
is
a
ilar manner the required thickness
"
the steel
of
have equal rigidity See Figure
,
order for
to
10
it
in
side panel will
be
be
.
to
found
1
/4
"
.
to
is
original
rib
.
as stiffener and thus one or more stiffeners must
as
deep
,
do
to
is
a
be provided Figure
.
the steel member The steel base which has equivalent rigidity
in
welded
9
.
,
important thing here
on
the stiffener effect the
is
in
s
'
,
,
unsupported top panel relative
of
's
.
A
.
stiffening than the much heavier cast panel design has been very simple and quick
This
.
.
it
, ,
used and welded together
be
and must
,
8
1
4
"
"
it 3/
/
requires only two operations shearing and weld
,
thickness ing Therefore the cost low
is
,
.
.
The weight
of
the base has thus been reduced
by
by 59 69 depending lot
65
and the cost
on
to
%
%
,
size
.
20
Second Redesign
fo
span
:
-
made by
An
be
changing the shape the base cross section How
of
.
ever this would require finding the moment
of
FIGURE
,
9
inertia .
doing this covered later example
is
.
panel between stiffeners can be read from the sec the cast iron can be
of
of
an
determined
13
it
,
,
:
.
.
=
A
the rigidity
(
of
of
of
the cast material that steel
to
previous nomograph
.
ed
from
This percentage can be found the first nomo
on
)
known type cast material by using the value for steel section
of
8
)
.
(
is
Line
1
reference line
.
"
=
C
known thickness
=
D
of
panel between
or
of
,
stiffeners
straight edge laid across the point
on
With
a
the
A
3
8
"
/
Line
B
lbs
C
Fig
.
Steel
11
stiffeners centers
on
on
Line Line
4
"
D
C
ing the the cast top panel Line Total cost relative that casting
of
of
thickness
to
is
,
1
E
"
39
28
for one
%
%
,
.
.2
Redesigning by Means of Equivalent Sections / 1. 5 - 7
Although this eliminates some flame - cutting or Total cost relative to that of casting is
shearing and considerable welding , it introduces an 38 . 4 % for one , 24 . 7 % for ten
the
the cost on larger lots .
plate thicity
ther reduction in plate
of
thickness can be made . This
Third Redesign : requires additi in
additional stiffeners as determined by the
,
A slightly better design can be had by flanging Sequires
second nomograph (Fig . 13 ).
OF
TO
REQUIRED RATIO CAST SPAN
13
to
of
Thickness
Steel panel
of
Length Steel span
Length Cast span
of
-
80 90 100
% % %
+ #
Thickness
(
of Casting
+
06
Type of
(
o
Casting
%
40
Steel 35018
Malleable ASTM 35210
Ordinary Malleable
20
Meenanite STM Class
grey iron
ttttt
20
%
HHHHHHHHH
ttttttttttttttttt
%
|
Steel Casting
of
it
of
8
Nº
grey iron
20
draw
to
thru
%
line from
C
B
A
of to _
-
52
read
%
Li length
C
of
thickness
E
-
of -
ľ
span of panel
52
span
%
of
hence
span
.
30
15
E• modulus of 52
or
elasticity
•
*
"
tension
-
.
1 5 —8 / Design Approach
,
continuously throughout the length of the member
,
acting as beam resist bending For simplifica
to
a
.
tion this view can be treated as single section
.
The Lincoln Rule now used find the moment
is
to
I
of inertia about the horizontal axis
of
this section
:
for more detailed description
on
See Sect the
3
.
I 2.
use rule
of
the
.
Estimate the neutral axis the section by
of
1
.
imagining where the section would balance sup
if
ported horizontal line through
on
this axis Draw
a
.
this mark this number
0
.
Draw horizontal line across the top ex
a
.
the section and one across the bottom
of
tremities
of the section mark these number
.Fig
10
extremities
,
Cast Iron Base 4900 lbs
14
.
(
)
Place the Lincoln
on
Rule the section
so
,
3
.
I
the top line and the number
10
on
that the number
is
By going thinner plate the blank edges may the neutral axis See Figure Mark off
on
16
is
to
O
,
.
points and draw horizontal lines through them
10
be reduc
of
.
-
of
tion cost the section into
in
so
Then place the rule
10
10
areas that the number
not require much weld
do
.
on
on
the bottom line and the number
is
is
intermittent fillet welding Diag the
0
ing sufficient
is
.
could be used and discussed Sect pertaining engineer scale measure off the
an
With
is
in
,
3
.6
of s
.
'
.
average width areas the top
of
Torsion
10
the
to
each
in
.
portion
of
the section Be sure consider the
to
This third redesign has now brought the weight
.
(
by up
the drawing the average widths of
of
scale Add
the original casting
of
of
.)
36
10
areas and divide
10
these
or more
,
25
of
of
what
.
10
average width
of
of
(
.
it
USE OF LINCOLN RULE above the neutral axis into rectangle whose
4
,
I
.
a
(
)
width equal the average width whose depth
of to is
is
to
, ,
redesigning machinery members that must
mo
In
equal inertia of
I
of
ment inertia the moment
is
to
great help developing Equi
of
valuable
in
.
20 an
ASTM
,
a
to
is
A
.
cross section
of
the base
-
to
to
,
be
the
2
:
.
(
I)
cast base Figure usually available as Fig section through cast machine
15
15
this Cross
is
,
-
.
a
.
.
Redesigning by Means of Equivalent Sections / 1. 5 - 9
KULE
portion portion
I$
12 . 0" 4. 0" $
- 4
I
RULE
14
.4
0
0
.
14
.9 .0
4
0
4
.
$
14
816
1
0
.
co
.
32
4
.
.
SIRULEI
10
co
8
.
00 -
RULE
00
"T"
0
00
v
1
2
.
IRULEJ
.6
6
6
1
Z
.
77
Total width 62
6
1
"
.
.
"
71
Average width
26
6
7
.
.
"
"
Height
12
12
16
to
,
4
2
.
"
"
of I
.
of
mine moment inertia cast member
a
rectangular area
of
of
.
its base
be
about considered
is
to
-
-
20
factor for steel
to
width
:
=
x
I
bending
40
of
of
of
the moment inertia the
in
is
)
(I
casting Hence
of
is
-
-
40
steel % cast iron
=
Itop
3450 in
=
.4
to
3980 4660
in
in
=
+
4
up
.
a
8640 within the outside dimensions the cast section and
in
=
of
.
inertia 3450
in
=
Determine the Required Property
a
STEP
.
)
(I
for the
section having least this value will be more rigid
3
at
:
Steel Member
than the cast section The dimensions and location
.
Consulting equivalent rigidity the two top flange plates must be retained
of
.
(
test
FA
24
4
"
'
1772"
-
-
.
base
.
LH
I
. -
1 5 10 / Design Approach
design must lend itself to the most economical The moment of inertia of the steel section is
methods of fabricating rolled steel .
steel section shown in Figure 17 is one pos
The
Isteel = 1 - M
sible solution . Its moment of inertia (I) is found by
the method known as “ Adding Areas ” . This is ex = 6457 - 20o = 6457 - 178
plained more fully in Sect . 2. 3 pertaining to Prop
erties of Sections . = 6280 in . ' (or 1. 8 times as stiff as
cast iron )
' The “ Adding Areas ” method was used to develop
the following table of properties for each component Since equivalent rigidity would have been a
of the section in order to compute the moment of in chieved with a moment - of - inertia value of only 3450
ertia of the entire section . in . , this design is 1 .8 times as rigid as the cast
Size Distance y A M l y Ig
14 x 1 3/ 4 + 12 . 37 24 . 50 + 303 . 0 | + 3745 .
1 1 /8 x 6 1 /2 + 7 . 25 7 . 31 + 53 . 0 384 . 25 . 7
1/ 2 x 4 - 2. 0 2. 00 - 4. 0 8.
6 x 1 /4 - 4. 0 1. 501 - 6. 0 24 .
E 16 . 75 X 3/ 8 - 4. 0 | 6 . 28 - 25 . 2 101 .
3 /4 x 6 1 /4 - 7 . 13 4 . 69 1 - 33 . 4 | 238 . 15 . 3
14 x 1 /4 - 7 . 13 | 3 . 50 | - 24 . 9 178 .
8 x 1 3/ 4 | - 11 . 13 14 . 00 - 156 . 0 1738 , 0 . . . . . ..
where :
base . See Figures 18 and 19 on facing page .
y = distance of area ' s center of gravity from
Now that the cross -section of the steel base has
section ' s reference axis
been designed , other less important components of
A = width x height of area the cast base are taken one at a time and converted
to steel . Figure 20 shows these various components
M = A x y
for the welded steel base , and Figure 21 shows the
Iy = M x y redesigned base fully assembled .
Ig = width x height of area Although this final steel base is 1 . 8 times as
12 rigid as the cast base , it weighs 49 % less and costs
38 % less .
of
-- --
-
DD
=
Fig . 19 Front view of welded steel =
=
machine base. 17
II
Load is the amount of external force applied to an As a tensile load is increased , the member
elastic body , tending to deform it . Under load , some elongates and its cross - sectional area decreases .
dimension or property of the member changes . Neither change affects the load . However , the de
Stress is the internal molecular resistance to such crease in cross - sectional area affects distribution
deformation , tending to restore the body to its orig of the load and thereby slightly increases the unit
inal condition once the load has been removed . tensile stress . Even this does not affect the pro
Strain is the amount of unit deformation that occurs portional relationship of the stress to strain within
under load . the elastic limits of the material .
Usually the change in the property of the section Any eccentricity in applying the load causes a
- area , moment of inertia , etc . - caused by loading bending moment . This sets up secondary bending
does not affect the value or nature of the loading . stresses which are added to the primary axial ten
Sometimes it does , and then the member may fail sile stresses . However , this bending moment tends
unexpectedly . to straighten out the neutral axis of the member so
There are five basic types of load : tension , that as the load is increased , the eccentricity
compression , shear , bending , and torsion . Figure decreases .
1 illustrates these various load conditions . Although 2. Compression is the force that pushes ,
nt Tension -
Kload Bending
Force
compression
La
<
Tension
Welds shear
in
Torsion
Bendina
K
Torsion
O
.
Compression
Load pressie
hear
Compression compression
Compression
i tension
Compression
of
.
presses squeezes member opposing di but not along the same line by shear may Failure
It or
from
,
a
a
.
Excessive loading compression causes failure by along diagonal slip lines tensile member
. in
in
a
.
crushing buckling
or
a
the principal stresses the application trans
of
of
or
in
in
1
forms which may exist long column which verse forces The overhead craneway bracket
it
B
in
”
,
.
A
.
might fail by buckling often occurs compres Figure loaded rather high shear because
. as
is
in
in
,
1
,
E
a
D
"
"
in a
amples are seen the compression member loaded bending but the fillet welds joining the
in
of
the
,
bracket the piston connecting rod flanges the web are stressed horizontal shear
in
to
in
and .
,
C
A
“
”
.
,
A
to .4
G
a
”
.
at
As compressive loading in
as
load
in
,
a
a
creased
it
,
,
1
E
a
.
This turn sets up bending moment causing the plication the load farther out along the beam would
of
in
,
or a
column deflect buckle slightly This deflec increase the bending moment bending moment
to
A
.
.
tion no matter how slight increases the eccentric also occurs the lever system
in
,
D
“
”
.
at
to
beam
in
A
in
is
by
straight
of
,
3
a
.
.
Loads and Their Evaluation / .
2 1- 3
large deflection , the cross - section may change in 2 . Impact loads are applied suddenly , usually at
area with a corresponding decrease in its moment high velocity . There is , frequently , actual impact
of inertia . This would both increase the bending ( a blow ) on the machine member by anothermachine
stress and decrease the member ' s resistance to member or some external body . Impact loads are
deflection , so that the possibility of failure in common to such machines as pile drivers , punch
creases at an accelerating rate . presses , etc .
Deflection of a straight beam under load takes 3. loads are applied in various ways ,
Variable
the form of a curve . Fibers between the neutral but each case the value of force is variable . In
in
axis and the outer surface are under tension , and
some cases the load is constantly varying , as in the
those along the inside of the bend or deflection are connecting rods in an engine . An extreme condition
under compression . Failure under a bending load is is typified by a rotating shaft which experiences a
usually the result of the outer fibers being stressed complete reversal of load on each cycle . If fibers
beyond their tensile limit or buckling of outer fibers
along the top of a shaft are stressed in compression ,
in compression . those along the bottom are stressed in tension . At
5. Torsional loading is the subjection of a mem any point on the shaft , each revolution produces a
change from tension to compression .
ber to torque forces that cause it to twist about its
central axis . Cranks , axles , spindles and other ro Over an extended period of time a member can
tating members , such as “ F ” in Figure 1, are under
withstand much less stress under severe variable
this type of load . load conditions . As a measure of the maximum unit
The principal deflection caused by torsion is stress that a material can withstand indefinitely
measured by the angle oftwist. The amount of twist under variable loading , its endurance limit is often
does not affect the torsional moment and therefore established by testing . For this reason , some
has no effect on the value of the moment . Failure forms of variable loads are commonly referred to
under torsional loading is usually a result of shear as fatigue loads .
stresses that develop as the load increases .
At the surface of a round steel shaft , for ex 3 .
VALUE OF LOAD
ample , the metal is stressed in shear in a direction In order to use many design formulas , it is nec
perpendicular as well as parallel to the axis of essary to determine the amount of load that will be
twist . The metal is stressed in tension in a direc applied to each machine member . The methods of
tion 45° these shear stresses and compression doing this are many and are often peculiar
to
in
the
to
of ,
Below
.
.
ap
these forces decrease as the central axis have their basis elementary mechanics and
is
in
of
proached Ultimate failure under torsion duct proper analysis the actual service conditions
of
a
.
.
ile steel shaft shear perpendicular Very often formulas or nomographs have al
is
the shaft
in
of to
axis Ultimate failure under torsion brittle ready been developed selecting equipment
a
.
in
aid
to
service
APPLICATION OF LOAD
.
2
.
on
There are three ways which load can be ap individual machine members
in
im
of
.
use the
to
2
(
)
.
.
Static loads are steady constant or are ap engineer the working tool with calcula
he
starts
at
1
,
.
plied slowly The load does not change very much required delivered horsepower for exam
of
tions
.
in
a
,
.
increase
,
a
in
its supports etc motor horsepower This will take into consideration
,
.
2 1 . - 4 / Load and Stress Analysis
friction , inertia of moving members , rotational or ultimate strength with proper consideration for
forces upon bearings and their housings , flywheel the safety factor . Once the member ' s proportions
energy , and so on . He now has a graphic picture of are established , this allowable unit stress can then
the loads emanating from the power train from end be translated into allowable load .
to end . From this information he proceeds further
to chart the distribution of forces , adding in the dead Ordinarily the allowable stress must be relative
weight of machine members . to the material' s yield strength . In most machine
members the permanent deformation that would re
Considering individual members , there are
sult from exceeding the yield strength might seri
many possibilities . Torque on a shaft or other re ously affect further performance of the member .
volving part is determined from the motor horse
This is not always the case however ; and if a degree
power and speed ( T = 63 , 030 x hp / rpm ) . Or , tool
of permanent deformation can be tolerated , a design
pressure and work or tool diameter , if known , per
based on ultimate strength can bemade at less cost .
mit calculating the torque .
In order for a machine member to have sufficient
Many mechanical and electromechanical trans rigidity , the maximum allowable strain or deflection
ducers are available to help in evaluating loads on is the determining factor . In the past many design
existing equipment or on prototypes . Many ofthese ers were under the impression that zero deflection
instruments incorporate electrical strain gages in a was desirable . This is not at all realistic : if zero
precision bridge - type sensing element. Such trans
deflection is mandatory , zero stress is mandatory .
ducers include load cells , pressure gages , torque This would mean the member could carry no load
meters , dynamometers , accelerometers , flow me at all .
ters , and load beams .
Once the maximum allowable strain is estab
equipment such as a hoist or lift truck , the
On lished , the corresponding stress figure can be ob
maximum load on members can be figured back
tained since stress and strain have a proportional
from the load required to tip the machine over . relationship within the elastic range . The safety
factor is applied here to determine the maximum
When following an existing design on a power allowable stress , which can then be used in propor
shovel or ditch digger for example , the maximum tioning the member .
strength of cables that have proven satisfactory in
service can be used to work back to the load on
The relationship of stress to strain is expressed
machine parts . by the material ' s modulus of elasticity , which is
30 , 000 , 000 psi for all steels in tension . Thus , if the
If a satisfactory starting point cannot be found ,
maximum allowable strain is 0 .001 in . / in . , the cor
the design can be based upon an assumed load and responding stress would be 30 , 000 psi . The modulus
subsequently adjusted from experience and test.
of elasticity of a steel in shear is 12 , 000 , 000 psi ;
therefore , it is essential to keep in mind the type of
4 . FACTOR OF SAFETY force involved .
The anticipated loading, translated into stresses , Any basic rule - of - thumb safety factor that is
dictate the proportions of the individual machine sufficient for static loads under ideal conditions
member . However , a factor of safety must be in must be increased under certain circumstances . It
cluded in the calculations in order to ensure the is important to correctly determine the mode of load .
member ' s withstanding greater forces that may Consider not only the condition at time of initial con
possibly result from : struction , but the possible effects of wear . A cam
1 . variations in the material ; follower in a barrel cam produces a variable load
2 . faulty workmanship in fabrication ;
ing . After a relatively short period of service ,
3 . variations in actual load (Ex : hitting an im
wear in the cam track often results in an additional
movable object with an agricultural imple severe impact loading .
ment; interrupted cut in rough machining High speed motion pictures and vibration moni
hard steel on a medium - duty machine tool ; toring equipment frequently revealvariable loading
overloading a lift hook ; etc .) ; and or impact loading conditions where only static loads
4 . error in design computations. had been assumed .
There are various ways determine the factor
to A variable load necessitates use of a higher
of safety , and various ways which to use it . The
in safety factor than a static load does . An impact load
two decisions are interrelated . also requires use of a higher safety factor .
In order for a machine member to have sufficient The presence of local areas of concentrated
strength , the maximum unit stress must be limited stresses are usually ignored in assigning a safety
to some value less than the material ' s yield strength factor under static load . However , under impact or
Loads and Their Evaluation / 2 1 . - 5
012
. .
Compression l o on _ _
_
(L
)2
1 . assign an initial factor of safety of 3 ; and = 1 927 6872EU
2. if a cast material , multiply by 1 43'; and from zero to C
or
4 . if impact loads , multiply by 2 .
o
=
(L
)
-v
1
For example , the factor of safety of the follow 72
E
ing materials would be :
)2
92
/L
. 1
1. rolled steel 3.0
.
?
L
C
2. cast steel ( 3 x 113 ) 4.0
16
900
2
1
3 . malleable iron 4.0
\
( 3 x 143 ) or
=
o
92
4 . gray cast iron 4.8
1
x 1. 2 )
)
L
.
/
r
( 3 x 113
5. extruded aluminum 3. 0
900
, 23
6 . cast aluminum ( 3 x 1% ) 4.0 272
E
/
=
:C
where
Oy
Voy
of
2
5
.
.
on
be used
in
to
if
,
ultimate tensile strength The structural field has widely adopted values
an
of
to
90
,
give the allowable unit stress 000 psi terials AISC research and specifications have been
30
of
be
to
.
,
used
in
fatigue loads
(
).
or
the
If
of
proper endurance value for the material These AISC
American Institute Steel Con
is
divided
(
by the factor safety as found above struction allowable values are realistic terms
of
in
)
.
today
,
's
to
on
It
calculated load
the and not ultimate strength
to
In
the view
a
specific member thereby giving us the allowable arguments designing avoid permanent
of
favor
to
in
,
be used our computations rather than the deformation not just failure these values appear
to
load
in
to
.
's
material or as multiplier the calculated load The safety factor figured into design calculations
to
in
a
the member we would end up with member that often recognized being too large and prob
is
as
. is
,
would fail only the applied forces reached times ably adding unnecessarily the product cost Very
if
to
3
its rated load bearing capacity often safety codes dictate the practice However
,
.
is -
of
fluence
,
unstudied secondary
or
of
power and other factors involved the total forces the influence unknown
in
,
forces
on
resultant safety margin for any individual member The safety longer as critical de
no
factor
is
in
.
.
2 1– 6 / Load and Stress Analysis
for
Fig . Brittle coatings are applied to surfaces of actual members study
of
3 surface stress
concentrations under various load conditions Here Stresscoat patterns are obtained from
,
.
dynamic loads
on
by photo elasticity
study is
on
of
based the
stress pattern revealed
by passing polarized
light through trans
a
model
of
parent the
member subjected
to
load
of
the amount
as
varies
.
Loads and Their Evaluation / . -
2 1 7
ALT
by
Fig The principle analysis photoelasticity adapted
of
stress has been
5
.
to
-
.
Photo Stress rosettes that accurately reveal both orientation and magnitude
principal strains within areas
of
of
limited strain gradient
,
.
sign calculations for many machine members This EXPERIMENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS
5
.
of .
To
to
well as
as
aid
to
in
proved electrical and hydraulic overload controls improve machine performance machinery builders
,
,
slip clutches overload relief beds presses for
are turning more frequently experimental stress
in
,
to
example more reliable shear pins qualifying fix analysis provides
of
mathemati
,
This verification
prevent oversize castings from
.
tures or stations
to
of
,
entering machinery station double blank detec complex force fields which discourage mathemati
,
a
cal analysis
,
cal nature
is
of
generally better reliability strains
of
, ,
.
advancements strain values the stresses can be interpolated
.
.
of lost productive time against the further cost re Brittle coatings are used study surface
to
1
.
of
stresses and locate areas
to
in
3
.
).
(
used
to
2
fabricating methods
.
due
to
.
).
(F
,
exhibit electrical
a
can be measured
.
.
2 1 – 8 / Load and Stress Analysis
Fig. 8 Measurements read by electromechanical strain gages are amplified and fed into
an oscillograph for permanent continuous record of the member 's behavior under load .
Here , structural strains on a proposed side -delivery rake design are recorded as equip
ment is pulled over obstacles .
SECTION .
2 2
Properties of Materials
1 . IMPORTANCE OF PROPERTIES specimen is placed in a tensile testing machine , and
All materials have certain properties which an load is applied to it by pulling the jaws
axial
must be known in order to promote their proper use . holding the ends of the specimen in opposing direc
These properties are essential to selection of the tions at a slow and constant rate of speed , Figure 2 .
best material for a given member . As the pulling progresses , the specimen elon
In the design of machine members , the proper
gates at a uniform rate which is proportionate to the
ties of material which are of primary concern are rate at which the load or pulling force increases .
those that indicate material behavior under certain Original distance
types of load . Some property of material is called between points
for in each of the basic design formulas .
Properties commonly found in engineering hand
books and suppliers catalogs ( Table 1) are these :
1 . ultimate tensile strength
2 . yield strength in tension
3. elongation
4 . modulus of elasticity
5 . compressive strength
6 . shear strength
7. endurance limit
Other properties such as modulus of resilience
and ultimate energy resistance , may also be given .
The various properties are best defined by a
description of what happens when a specimen of the
material is subjected to load during laboratory tests .
- 21
final distance or 25
2 . TENSILE PROPERTIES elongation in 2 "
%
at two points 2 " apart , as shown in Figure 1. The after testing to failure , showing maximum
elongation .
25 25 25
1 1 1
0 0 0
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
000
,
18
15
80
25
35
55
60
85
,
1
T
B
V
0
0
.
.
90 85
8 20
20 15
00 00
65 000
15 15
2515
2525
5025
, ,
Republic
, ,
0 0
1 1
0 0
1 1
0 0
1 1
. .
. .
.
70
000 000
.
.
.
100
000 000
115
000 000
60
18
15
80
25
35
55
85
US Steel
,
,
.T
B
V
0
0
1
Youngstown Yoloy
65
95
20
12
60
30
00
80
S
1
.
Sheet Tube
&
( &
Jones
of
Steel
Steel
&
Iron
Sheet
US Steel
Bethlehem
Alan Wood
TABLE
Producer
&
Armco Steel
Inland Steel
Lukens Steel
Kaiser Steel
Youngstown
America
2
Crucible Steel
Colorado Fuel
National Steel
Republic Steel
Steel and
/ Load and
Great Lakes
Pittsburgh Steel
Laughlin
Weirton Steeli
Tube
N N
Ex Ex - - Tri Hi Hi Hi
JLX
Tri
GLX
- - - -
GLX
- - A A
GLX
GLX
- - - - -
Jalten
- -
- - - - - - - - -
Yoloy
Yoloy
X
Yoloy
Yoloy
- - X
Stress
Mayari
Man
60 5550 45
Ten
Ten
-
Steel
Ten
Maxeloy
- -
Kaisaloy
Clay loy
45
Steel
Cor Ten
- - 60 55 50
Cor Ten
Republic
Par Ten
Republic
M M E WW WW R
Man Ten
- - - -W
WWW No
Dynalloy 1
Dynalloy II
5045 M .
Yoloy EHS
Man 440
-B -A (
Yoloy 50W
Yoloy 45W
Pitt Ten No
Yoloy A242
50
No
1
HSX
Alloy
. . (
1 1
A440
Medium Manganese
High Tensile
)
High Strength No . 1
Analysis
Manganese Vanadium
High Manganese
Structural High Strength
50 50 50 50 50 5060 55 50 45 50 50 5845 50 6055 50 4550 5050 50 50 5050 50 50 50 50 50
50 45 45505045 50 50 5045 5050 50 , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
psi
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Yield
, , , , , , , ,
Point,
50 , 000
50 , 000
50, 000
000
45 , 000
000
000
40 , 000
45 , 000
45, 000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000 000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
45 000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
70 75 70 75 70 70 70 70 8075 70 65 70 75 8360 70 8075 70 65 70 7070 70 70 75 70 70 70 70 75 70
70 65 707070 80 70 70 70 , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , ,
psi
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Ult .
70 , 000
000
60 , 000
60 , 000
62 , 000
000
000
64 , 000
000
000
70 , 000
70 , 000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
62 000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
- PROPERTIES AND COMPOSITION
%
Strength , Elong
20 22
22
.,
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
. . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IC
0. 15
0 . 25
0. 15
0. 10
0 . 15
0 . 22
0 . 15
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 . . .
Mo
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. . . 0. . . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 . 70
0 . 80
0 . 70
0 . 80
0 . 60
1. 25
1. 35
75
75
75
35 75 25 20 25 35 75
75
75 75 75 35 75 75 50 40 30 25 35 3575
75
65 65 40 60 00 0025 25 35 35 75 75 35 3575 75 60 50 60 25
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Si
. . . . . . .
0. 15
0 . 30
0 . 15
0 . 30
0 . 25
0 . 10
0. 30
30 20 30 75 1010 10 10 30 35 50 60 10 10 1010 25 10 10 30 30 30 15 35 50 30 30 55
25 30 30 3030 30 30 10 30 30 10 10 50 50
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
oo . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cu
. . 0. . . .
OF HIGH - STRENGTH
. . . . . . .
0 . 60
0 . 60
0. 45
0 . 20
0 . 45
40 20 35 30 35 30 30 20 20 20 95 50 20 30 50
20 35 35 3520 00 40 2065 85 20 25
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 . . . . .
. .
Mo
LOW
0. 10
0 . 10
40 10 20 10 10 15 18
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 . . .
. . . . . . .
Co
80 30 55 80 25 25 25 70
40 40
Nominal Composition , %
0 0 1
ALLOY
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . .
. . . . . . . . . . .0
Ni
0. 75
55
75 65 40 60 60 50
70 70 70 65 70
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o.
0 0 0
.
V V V,
, , . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
ů
. . .
o
. . .2
10 02
03
02
STEELS
01
05 02
04
02 02 01 10 03 03 03 Ti Ti Ti 03 03 03 03
Other
0 02 V
V V v V V
V V V Zr Cb CbCbCb Zr
CbCb CbCb
Magazine
Cb Cb
Properties of Materials / 2 2 . - 3
The load divided by the cross - sectional area of the test machine jaws in opposing directions causes a
specimen within the gage marks represents the unit permanent elongation or deformation of the speci
stress or resistance of the material to the pulling men material . In the case of a low - or medium
or tensile force . This stress ( o ) is expressed in carbon steel , a point is reached beyond which the
pounds per square inch , psi. The elongation of the metal stretches briefly without an increase in load .
specimen represents the strain ( € ) induced in the This is the yield point .
material and is expressed in inches per inch of For low - and medium - carbon steels , the unit
length , in . / in . Stress and strain are plotted in a stress at the yield point is considered to be the
diagram , shown in simplified form in Figure 3 .
material ' s tensile yield strength ( cy) . * For other
The proportional relationship of load to elonga metals , the yield strength is the stress required to
tion or of stress to strain , continues until a point
, strain the specimen by a specified small amount
beyond the elastic limit . For ordinary commercial
is reached where the elongation begins to increase
purposes , the elastic limit is assumed to coincide
at a faster rate . This point, beyond which the elon
gation of the specimen no longer is proportional to with the yield strength .
the loading, is the proportional elastic limit of the Beyond the material ' s elastic limit , continued
material . When the load is removed , the specimen pulling causes the specimen to neck down across its
returns to its original dimensions . diameter or width . This action is accompanied by a
Beyond the elastic limit , further movement of the further acceleration of the axial elongation , which is
now largely confined within the relatively short
necked - down section .
Ultimate strength
The pulling force eventually reaches a maximum
value and then falls off rapidly , with little additional
TT
elongation of the specimen before failure occurs . In
failing , the specimen breaks in two within the
psi
,
Fracture
50 Upper yield necked -down portion . The maximum pulling load ,
a point expressed as a stress in psi of the original cross
1000
Proportional
elastic limit Ductility and Elasticity
in
1
.
).
(
and
in
is
025
,
100
125
2
"
0050 075 qi50 0175 0200 0225 usually expressed as The cross
,
percentage
0
0
0
.
to
in
in
,
./
.
,
A
percentage and re
3
-
.
.
,
the
other properties Here most critical The symbols commonly used for yield strength ultimate
,
.
,
*
the
curve
do
is
load
,
.
.
. -
2 2 4 / Load and Stress Analysis
-Lt
between 10 , 000 , 000 and 25 , 000 , 000 psi , depending on
the grade .
Steel
,
psi
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
3
.
1000
is
to
compressive strength of steel equal its ten
is
to
a
Stress
is
also adhered
in
to
.
some rigidity design calculations where the modu
in ,
elasticity the material
of
of
lus tension used
is
o
iron
f
is
Rubber
.
in
I
The actual ultimate compressive strength
of
steels may be somewhat greater than the ultimate
002
.
compressive
0
0
tensile strength The variation
in
.
Strain
least partially dependent the condi
in
in
,
values
on
is
at
./
.
of
tion the steel
an
of
Fig Stress strain curves for several
:
4
-
.
curve displaying
a
,
psi
area percentage indicate material
of
duction the
's
1000
ductility
.
is
it
,
In
Stress
Endurance
sential keep the stresses resulting from loading oo
to
10
within the elastic range the elastic limit very
If
.
Limit
close the material yield strength exceeded
is
to
,
's
flow
.
105
106
107
108
strain hardened and
is
,
of
N
Stress
"
"
-
higher yield strength
.
on
test results
of
5
.
a
of
or
vs
stress
,
;
O
N
-
annealed
is
to
,
ultimate strength
no
on
have effect the member would be the case with cold worked steel There
a
's
(
-
and may create degree of risk some applica relationship between the compressive .
on
of
less
is
a
.)
,
als stretch less than others elas compressive test conducted similar that
of
The modulus
is
to
A
.
ticity material simplifies the comparison for tensile properties but short specimen
of
of
sub
is
,
a
E
a
(
)
is
,
a
.
property the ratio the stress the strain plied the specimen from two directions axial
to
is
in
elasticity
o
of
Modulus
=
E
·
of
the curve where the stress directly pro the Young modulus of elasticity conventionally
of
tion
is
's
)
(
,
of .
higher the modulus elasticity and the stiffer the discussed Section
in
.
Compression
on
material Fig
2
.5
.
4
.
).
(
,
a
approximately psi
of
bend
of
a
.
Properties of Materials / 2. 2 - 5
ing moment that increases as the deflection in series of identical specimens are tested , each
A
creases . Geometry of the member has much to do under a specific load value expressible as a unit
with its capacity to withstand compressive loads , stress . The unit stress is plotted for each specimen
and this will be discussed more completely under against the number of cycles before failure . The
Section 2 .5 on Compression . result is a o - N diagram ( Fig . 5 ) .
With long columns , the effect of eccentric load
The endurance limit ( usually Or ) is the maximum
ing is more severe in the case of compression than
stress to which the material can be subjected for an
tension ,
indefinite service life . Although the standards vary
for various types of members and different indus
4. SHEAR STRENGTH
tries ,it is a common practice to accept the assump
There is no recognized standard method of test tion that carrying a certain load for several million
ing for shear strength of a material . Fortunately , cycles of stress reversals indicates that load can
pure shear loads are seldom encountered in ma be carried for an indefinite time.
chinery design but shear stresses frequently de
velop as a byproduct of principal stresses or the Theoretically the load on the test specimens
application of transverse forces . should be of the same nature as the load on the
proposed machine member , i. e . tensile , torsional ,
The ultimate shear strength (T) is generally as
etc . ( Fig . 6).
sumed to be 34 the material ' s ultimate tensile
strength .
Since the geometry of the member , the presence
Some shear values are obtained from torsional of local areas of high stress concentration , and the
loading , but these are not valid for stresses beyond
condition of the material have considerable influ
the elastic limit . The ultimate shear strength is ence on the real endurance limit , prototypes of the
often obtained from an actual shearing of the metal , member would give the most reliable information as
usually in a punch - and - die setup using a ram moving
test specimens . This is not always practical how
slowly at a constant rate of speed . The maximum
ever . When building one - of - a -kind , fatigue tests
load required to punch through the metal is observed , are seldom possible . Lacking any test data or
and ultimate shear strength is calculated from this . handbook values on endurance limit , see Section 3 . 2
on Fatigue .
5 . ENDURANCE LIMIT
When the load on a member is constantly varying 6 . IMPACT PROPERTIES
in value , is repeated at relatively high frequency , or Impact strength is the ability of a metal to absorb
constitutes a complete reversal of stresses with the energy of a load delivered onto the member at
each operating cycle , the material ' s endurance high velocity . A metal may have good tensile
limit must be substituted for the ultimate strength strength and good ductility under static loading, and
where called for by the design formulas . yet break if subjected to a high - velocity blow .
Under high load values , the variable or fatigue The two most important properties that indicate
mode of loading reduces the material ' s effective the material ' s resistance to impact loading are ob
ultimate strength as the number of cycles increases . tained from the stress - strain diagram ( Fig . 7 ) . The
At a given high stress value , the material has a first of these is the modulus of resilience ( u ) which
definite service or fatigue life , expressed as “ N ” is a measure of how well the material absorbs
cycles of operation .
LEVER
fa
MOTOR
FLOWER PULL HEAD
. -
2 2 6 / Load and Stress Analysis
Fig
the stress strain
In
7
.
, -
diagram
at for
Unit impact the
stress
moment
of
elongation
(0) ultimate stress factor
is
in
a
determining the toughness
of
the material ulti
of
terms
in
mate energy resistance
.
Unit strain
(€
)
energy providing practicality the following formula can
be
not stressed above the elastic used
is
. it
:
limit yield point indicates the material re
or
It
s
. '
Uu
Oy
eu
ou
deformation from impact loading
2 +
sistance
to
See (
Impact
on
Section
3
1
.
.)
where
:
resilience the triangular
of
The modulus
is
(u
)
Oy
material shear strength
area OAB under the stress strain curve having its
's 's
-
Ou
the elastic limit material ultimate strength
at
=
tri
.
the right
of
at
point
of
of
Eu
the material
,
strain
o
(
)
=
angle and the resultant strain
)Ey
Thus
,
of
is
a
metric property psi
2E
lbs
cu
Uu
Uu
the
u
in
in
in
in
,
=
.-
.
.
/
Tests developed for determining the impact
where modulus elasticity
of
their
=
E
in
absorption energy actually volu results Nearly all testing done with notched
is
of
is
Since the
.
a
is
cu
lbs
it
,
the
in
in
in
in
,
=
u
/
.-
.
.
yield strength
.
it
,
specimens used
(
in
toughness the material rather than resilience
in
of
in
Toughness the metal
of
to
,
universal impact
be
a
indicated
is
.
,
of
mate energy resistance measure of The minimum amount
uu
This
is
in
to
the material
of
In to
fracture
a
s
'
.
the total
is
)
.
of
cluded angle
of of
45° and
in a
. metres
0
.
.
10
165
394
952
50394
"
-
. 2
"
—
"
.
"
2
1
SECTION 2. 3
Properties of Sections
FIGURE 1
10 "
ΣΜ sum of all moments In the second method , the whole section is broken
n = or
. .. .. . .. . .. ... (
into rectangular elements . The neutral axis of the
ΣΑ total area
whole section is first found . Each element has a
(4 · 6 · 14) + (2 · 12 · 6) + (4 · 8 · 2) moment of inertia about its own centroid or center
of gravity ( C . G . ) equal to that obtained by the for
(4 · 6) + (2 · 12) + (4 • 8)
mula shown for rectangular sections . ( See Table 1 . )
+ 44 + 64 544
i
_ 336
32 en In addition , there is a much greater moment of
24 + 24
inertia for each element because of the distance of
= 6 .8"
its center of gravity to the neutral axis of the whole
section . This moment of inertia is equal to the
Thus , the neutral axis is located 6 . 8 " above the area of the element multiplied by the distance of its
reference axis or base line and is parallel to it . C . G , to the neutral axis squared .
Finding the Moment of Inertia Thus , the moment of inertia of the entire section
about its neutral axis equals the summation of the
There are various methods to select from to get two moments of inertia of the individual elements ,
the value of moment of inertia (I ) . Six good methods
are presented here .
of the section (detailed further in Fig . 2 ) about its TABLE 1 - PROPERTIES OF STANDARD SECTIONS
neutral axis is found as follows : Radiusof
Section
, . 83 Momentof
6 . 43
In =
In =
1 + (6 · 4 · 7.22 ) + 40
2
+ (2 . 8 · 1. 22) +
Inertia Modulus Gyration
12 , 12
10 · 43
04 + 10 . 4 . 4 . 82)
((10
12 + • 4
= 32 + 1244 + 85 .3 + 23 + 53 . 3 + 921 . 6
= 2359 in .
- bi
. (Dº_ ) | (Dd |
dº VD +
Neutral
- T T - n Axis
ab аъ
Trab
FIGURE
( 19 –
c8d
3
vanad
cºd
ab
* abcd
|
)
_
(
4a
)
V
a
Thus
:
M2
na
Iy
In
(4
=
(6
)
A
..
)
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
na
Iy
In
(5
=
.
.
.
)
.
.
.
.
.
–
where
:
its
moment
of
In
=
Sinon
non
neutral axis
,
total area
all
of
sum
=
M2
and
nº
-y
y
,
course
=
A2
the moments all elements
of
of
sum
=
M
y
y
,
-
AMP
)
:
-
elements
=
.
section
1
for
Although Iy for any individual element is equal
to its area ( A ) multiplied by the distance squared plied by distance again give 160 inches
to
to
y
2
(
)
"
from its center of gravity to the reference axis the fourth power This value for the element
's
.
( y2) , each element has in addition a moment of in moment of inertia about the common reference
ertia ( 18) about its own center of gravity . This must axis recorded under the table
is
)Iy
in
y
y
(
-
.
be added in if it is large enough , although in most
of
of
the moment inertia the plate about
)Ig
If
cases it may be neglected :
(
gravity appears be significant
of
its own center
to
,
figured by multiplying
of
this value the width the
is
M2 plate by the cube its depth and dividing by
is of
12
.
placed the extreme
7
Ig
ly
.
..
.
.
..
.
..
.
.
..
.
.(
)
In
Ig
then
=
A=
in
-
right
be
hand column later added with the
to
in
,
-
The best way illustrate this method work
of
is
to
to
Thus
Iy
sum
,
.
problem
.
a
bd3
18
12
=
Problem
3
10
43
:
53
in
=
.“
lo
.
"
4
ņ
of
small enough that
Ig
is
it
need not be considered our example this value
In
,
.
14
53 could be considered although will not make
of
it
,
,
3
much difference the final value The greater the
in
.
of
depth any element relative the maximum width
to
of
of
the more the likelihood
12
the section its value
Ig
,
@
4
"
being significant
Base
y
"
.
The table will now be filled out for plates and
B
as well
C
FIGURE
. Ay
My bds
4
M
in=
=
y
A
A
: b
d
1,
Distance
?
y
Plate Size
in
12
in
will refer
.y of
as
be
.
a
10
x4
.0 .3 .3
ence axis
0
0 0 0
2
, is
"
"
.
"
.
y
,
,
a
-
X8
24 16
85
dimensions are put down along with 128 1024
14 8
table form
.0
"
2
B
in
"
"
|
.
32
x4
.0
.0
6
"
y
"
"
.
.
(
)
as is
.0
.0
6
.0
1
It
.
that
,
;
b
d
x
.
(
;
Is
In
-
M
1
=
+
. Ay
My bd3
M
=
=
y
A
. A
.1
. b
d
Size
?
.
Distance
y
1x
Plate
12
in
in
in
in =
1200
'
sene 544
(
-)
.6
=
-
80
10
x4
2
"
"
"
2359
in
=
X8
B
.*
8
2
"
"
"
x4
6
"
"
Total 544
M
PĀ80
_
and
-
n
up
from bottom
=
6
8
)
.
"
the
given information from the plates The rest of the treating M2
of
recommended method
.
on
A
or
on
slide rule
by
Here we
on
80 M
,
Notice how
have 544 divided by which gives us
.
This
6
8
.
.
Starting multiplied by
with plate Then without resetting the
10
to
in ,
A
4
"
"
entered in
sq
by
of
,
.
.
the table under Without resetting the slide rule the indicator of the rule down 544 and read the
to
to
,
is A.
this figure for multiplied by distance answer as 3700 Many times necessary
to
know
is
to
y
it
A
2
"
(
, .
give
80
inches cubed This value for the element the neutral axis and can easily
be
found without
it
's
.
in
M
.
Properties of Sections / . -5
2 3
M2
Problem 4 In = ly + 1g -
2"
– ( 88
656
)
= 7637
2747
in
.
656
M
and
Ā88
=
n
o0
"16
up
45
from bottom
=
7
(
.
)
"
of
of
Moment Inertia Rolled Sections
4
"
|
A
Fourth Method
A
)
"10
of
is
The fourth method the use steel tables found
the other steel handbooks
in
handbook and
C
S
FIGURE
I..
.
.
is .
5
of
,
show
,
a
.
2359 not large enough and the section must
is
in
*
.
(
Inertia by Lincoln
of
be made larger Increasing the plate size Moment Rule
at
the top
“
I”
.
is
(
X
)
6
4
x
"
"
"
"
a
area the already existing section
to
See
2
4
x
"
"
by
.
Figure The previous column totals are carried The fifth method was developed the Lincoln
5
.
forward and properties Electric Company and the Lincoln Moment Iner
of
only the added area need
of
, ,
,
An
be entered then solved using the corrected actual scale
In
is
to
.
,
.
of
the member needed
is
totals
s
'
.
.
is
Ay Ay My bd moment inertia for complex cast sections
of
in =
M
in =
=
A
. b
d
.1
. ?
Plate
.
.
Size Distance
y
in
12
.
by
Rule
in
..
“
I”
following instructions the next right page which
on
Previous Section 80 544 5888 170
0
.0
.0
.6
,
.
8
0
.6
.0
2
0
"
"
"
.
Total 7456 181
88 656 Basically the Lincoln Rule functions by con
.0
.2
.0
.0
“
I”
7637
verting irregular cross section two simple
to
an
-
676
5
RULE
Fig
I 3
2
The Rule permits -1
6
.
55
I
"
"
--
irregular section I
an
moment
RULE
's
quickly esti
be
of
inertia
to
2
mated from the sectional view 3
4
of
the member 5
190876
.
RULEI
gamis
I5
-
"T
RULES
LINCOLN
2 3 . - 6 / Load and Stress Analysis
67
5
. al
4
3 Fig . 7 -B An irregular sec
areas by
2
tion divided into 10
inertia proportional to
is
width of area .
- - - X, X - -
I
Fig rectangle representing the top half
RULE
A
7
.
-
by
of
10
areas the
,
a
Rule
"
"
of
that standard formulas can be used cross
so
the section
.
:
Fundamental principles involved include
of
gravity
of
Estimate the center
:
the section
1
.
section about its by imagining where the section would balance
of
of
moment
The inertia
if
1
a
(
)
of
at
a
.
its top and bottom portions about the neutral axis through this
of
is
;
.
.
this
of
rectangle
of
a
)
its base equals the sum of the moments of all lines parallel
of
at
Draw the the
to
2
.
10
the section
.
.
“
”
The Lincoln Rule divides the top and bottom upper portion
on
Place the rule section
of
“
I”
3
.
“
portions into parts The scale
I”
10
of
is
is
number
so
10
on
that the
.
s
'
10
on
its
is
0
.
proportional
of
of
.
the width of the individual part Thus Figure divides the top portion of the section into
to
areas
10
in
,
.
as .
all areas have the same width and
10
below
,
A
7
-
With engineer
scale the same scale
an
's
(
In
x
off
of
Figure wide as ma measure
as
area No twice
is
)
,
B
7
cupancy
of
areas
10
in
consequently
of
up
10
twice the moment of inertia Area No three Add these
is
.
7
.
average width
of
of .
inertia The rule has now transformed the top portion
.
to
Knowing that the moment
of
of
inertia
a
a
equal
-
-
of
to
of
of
inertia the
very easy section
of
of
to
.
it
.
7
a
-
.
Figure
of
of
To
of
to
to
is
6
.
of
The resultant figure the width of rectangle zero mark always placed
10
of
of on
“
”
I
on
the
x
-
.
a
formula
inertia of the top and bot
of
7
.
of
tom
moment of inertia irregular part using
an
an
of
entire section
,
.
-
8
- . -- 8 A
WC 41
19
WC 41
SIZE
10 6
9 4
SIZE
8
.-
DRAWING
2
. 7
DRAWING
|" 6
RULE
"
2
|
LENGTHS
FITS
5
LENGTHS
4
FITS
BEST
RULE
4
RULE
BEST
THAT
RULE
3 |"
RULE
OTHER
THAT
OTHER
10
LENGTH
10
FOR
"B 9
LENGTH
3 "
FOR
" 8
RULE
4 A"
:3
5 AU
RULE
7
RULE
.1 .2
SELECT
RULE
6
SEE
6
Serie
SELECT
7
..
SEE
8
9 12 6
"
10
|
RULE
Sections
Sections
Irregular
Irregular
MAKE YOUR OWN " I" RULE
|"5for
-
RULE
B
-
can make your own “ I ” Rule for
A
You
simply by cutting out the paper rules to
the right on this page , then adhesive
mounting them (one on each side ) to a
strip of plastic , metal , or card stock
also cut to size . Cut so as to remove o
"I"
the outer guide lines . 8
-8
RULE
Ž
8 9
LINCOLN
9
LINCOLN
10 10
Properties of Sections / .
2 3 – 9
5
4
3
"I"
NL
RULE
NEUTRAL AXIS
Y
RULE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BOTTOM
by
.
"
ſ"
.
2 3 – 10 / Load and Stress Analysis
5.43
TOP
SECTION
NEUTRAL
AXIS
BOTTOM
SECTION
177 %
1. Estimate the section ' s center of gravity (CG ) . 6 . Total the ave . ge widths and divide by 10 .
2. Draw neutral axis . The result is aver ce width (b ) , ( Fig . 11) .
3. Draw lines A -Ai and B -Bı . 7. Scale the distance from the neutral axis to
Select the scale on the “ I ” Rule that fits the the line A -Ai. This is depth (d ) .
section . 8 . Compute the moment of inertia of the top
5 . Scale the average width of each individual section above the neutral axis . Computa
area (Fig . 10 ) . tions are given below .
9. Repeat this procedure for the bottom section .
TOP PORTION BOTTOM PORTION Computations are given below .
10 . Add the moments for the top and bottom
Section Width Section Width sections together to obtain the moment of
inertia for the entire section .
45
00
1
1
.
.
00
. 1. 1.
.
67
WN
87 78
A
wooo
4
.
00
This sixth method called the Unit Properties
2
6 5
. .
to
2 2
eros
. .
45 00 give
of
and
A
.
,
,
,
(2
5
)
.
00 00 00 00
2
. . . .
S
(
)
32
ment of inertia
coop
2
. . .
,
)
(I
20
or
by
E fabricated
7
2
FNC
48
2
deep all
other dimensions being based
on
the
= 67
,
54
) 28
.
(b .
1 "
depth
Average Width
of In
77
Average Width
,
43
.
=
5
b
"
"
|
.
.
" (
)
Depth
,
Depth
a
=
=
3
.5
(d
6
(d
width of
"
)
.
)
the depth
of
3
a
/
bottom
bd3
30 as
The thickness
is
,
bds
bø°
% a
.
78
162
in
Itop
–
percentage
of
in
to
%
.
I
.0
=
=
3
2
of
the depth
.
Itop
+
I
Itotal 240
in
=
its
plate thickness
is
Properties of Sections / . -
2 3 11
ya % 1 2 3
060
0134 0182 0240 0410 .
.
0047 0051 0053 0057 0061
.
.
.
.
.
.
A
(
)
Unit 0226 0258 0334 0610 0880
0086 0091
.
0070 0075 0079
.
.
.
.
.
.
Depth
024 0330 080
.
0101 0106 0116 0120
.
0094
Depth
.
.
.
.
.
.
nilmillvilo
Factor 05124 14160
01184 01266 01321 01431 01492 02850 03970 0964
.
.
.
.
of
.
.
.
.
.
of
Thickness
069470 08986 1712 24972
Thickness
.
02525 02833
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0320 0364 0393 0409 0630 0914 1166 2230 3290
0345
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
% 0410 04415 04635 05065 0531 % 07254 1052 1353 2634 3914
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
4710
lilis
0648 07662 0814 1203 1592 3152
07220
.
0616
.
.
05660
.
.
.
.
.
To
factor values are for unit sections deep use these
.
"
by
multiply
di
values the cubed depth the desired section
of
them Sunità
,
=
S
:
OF
TO
TO
Ratio WIDTH DEPTH Ratio
of
WIDTH DEPTH
Ya
1
L
(B
)
0031 0035 0039 0048 0056 0067 0091 0120 0205 030
.
.
.
.
.
.
Unit
0047 0054 0060 00071 0083 0095 0129 0167 0305 0440
Stiffness
.
.
.
Depth
Depth
0063 0071 0077 0095 0108 Factor 012 0165 0212 040 0570
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
00767 00881 00967 01164 01323 01425 01985 02562 0482 07080
.
of
.
of
.
.
.
.
.
Thickness
Thickness
01416 01637 01800 02175 02363 02457 034735 04493 0856 12486
.
.
.
.
.
.
0197 0228 0250 0304 0332 0315 0457 0583 1115 1645
.
.
.
.
.
Nilrillviloloog
% 02427 02839 0314 03845 04212 % 03627 0526 06763 1317 1957
.
.
.
.
.
.
0280 0332 0369 04535 0501 0390 0568 0739 1455 2180
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
03158 03742 04171 051964 05789 0407 06013 0796 1576 2355
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
To
The above stiffness factor values are for unit sections deep use these values
,
1
.
"
by
Iunit
=
:
I
·
its depth the appropriate Unit Properties the actual section depth cubed
On
to
's
.
Su
S
a
(
)
(9
..
..
..
..
..
.
)
a
.
section
is
to
it
,
1
"
6
's
a
T
“
dº The
,
5 1
% /2
a
a
"
"
"
.
Iu
=
8
I
)
(
.
.
.
.
of
42
width the
is
is
,
depth
Similarly
.
of
,
;
2
0
,
=
0
.7
.*
.
·
'
I
)
. - 12 /
2 3 Load and Stress Analysis
TABLE
TABLE
TABLE 4: TABLE
5 5:
:
O
D
:
T
4
TO
TO
OF
OF
Ratio WIDTH DEPTH Ratio WIDTH DEPTH
na
2
1
|
|
*
2
0085 0092 0099 0108 0114 0150 0210 0250 0450 0620
.
.
.
.
.
(A
)
0128 0138 0150 0159 0170 Unit 0240 0300 0360 0660 0910
.
.
.
.
.
.
Strength
Depth
Depth
0168 0182 0198 0211 0275 0280 0380 0470 0850 1200
silmililril
.
Factor
.
.
.
.
.
02087 02247 02445 02643 02783 03456 045772 057302 10246 14746
of of
.
.
.
.
.
.
Thickness
Thickness
03930 04260 04510 05050 05315 05766 077990 098374 17970 26104
.
.
.
.
0558 0608 0648 0728 0770 0710 100 1250 2350 3490
.
.
.
.
.
.
% 07025 07705 08190 09273 09817 % 07974 1124 1425 2759 3986
.
.
.
.
092 0980 1118 1185 120 1550 300 4390
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1057 1132 1295 1382 1235 1624 3184 4744
.
.
.
.
.
The above strength deep
To
factor values are for unit sections use these
: .
l"
by
dº
values them the desired section Sunit
,
=
S
·
TO
OF
TO
OF
Ratio WIDTH DEPTH Ratio WIDTH DEPTH
44
.
(
)
.
.
.
0075 0117
Unit 0150 0180 0330
0087 0093 0130 0120 0455
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Stiffness
.
Depth
Depth
0098 0114 0124 0155 0173 0140 0190 0235 0425 0600
Factor
.
.
.
.
.
0121 01385 01536 01933 02172 01728 022886 028651 05123 07373
of
.
of
.
.
.
.
.
Thickness
Thickness
02197 02545 02831 0360 04052 02883 038995 049187 08985 13052
.
.
.
.
milililouli
0302 0347 0389 0503 0560 0355 050 0625 1175 1745
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
% 03645 04311 04852 06287 07125 % 03987 0562 07123 1378 1993
.
.
.
.
.
.
25
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
factor values are for unit sections deep use these values
To
.
"
by
them Iunit
=
d
:
I
·
time con
of
,
.
,
7
designer requires welded section having section finally found which will satisfy the con
A
is
,
a
T
“
”
.
proportioned that the width of required This trial and error method costly
so
about
is
section
is
1
2
/
fast
is
the depth
is
of
know
to
%
exact solution
it
,
that
less than minutes
in
inertia
.
I it
T
“
”
:
.
of
depth
10 12
depth
of
%
his
section then solve for its neutral axis and then By referring Table using the above in
to
and
,
2
Properties of Sections / 2.3 - 13
formation , the unit moment of inertia is found to be having the same thickness ( Fig . 12 ). For proper
rigidity , this section musthave a moment of inertia
Iu = 0 .01416 in . 4 ( I) of 3100 in . The problem is to determine the
proper thickness of plate to use in fabricating the
Since I= Iu da base .
24 _ I _ 700 .0 = 49 ,500 I = lu da
Iu .01416
lu = 14
1
.
3100 = 0079 in “ .
and d = 14 . 9" or 15 '' ; therefore (25 )
b = 12d = 7 . 5 " Using the lower part of Table simple
4 for a
t = 10 %d = 1 . 5 "
channel section , since b = 2d and
This would be fabricated by welding a 11/2" X 71/2" .
Lu = 0079
flange plate to a 142" x 13 /2" web plate . the required thickness (t) is found to be 2% of the
depth , or 2 % x 25 " = 1/2" thick .
Problem
Therefore , this base would be fabricated out of
8
ANTTI
Piano Wire
Ww =
wod ?
3 . 63
Battery clip
= 54 in
712 "
- 10 "
16 seconds for 10 oscillations 34 seconds for 10 oscillations
.4 | 2
Isto
13
54
std
lx = 244
in
=
2a
5
5
(
)
(
)
=
=
s
.6
1
in
|
.Fig
13
of
of
and thickness . The moment of inertia of the stand Since this distance can be measured two
in
c
(
)
ard rectangle is computed from the following : directions there are actually two values for this
,
property although only the smaller value usually
is
,
b d3
rolled sections because re
1
of
available tables
Istd
in
it
12
=
is
in
If
.
The standard rectangle
then fastened by metrical these two values are equal Section modu
is
,
a
small clip piano wire the strength
is
of
of
, of
the the lus measurement the beam
as to
at
end thin
a
the neutral axis given slight bending unsymmetrical section the outer
an
same line
is
In
It
in
a
.
.
twist and then released complete face having the greater value will have the
10
The time for
( of
.
)S (c
)
oscillations measured and this divided by lower value of section modulus
of
course
10
is
to
and
get the average period the greater stress has the greater stress
of
vibration Since
it
,
.
.
this the value needed
is
The given cross section then hung the wire
on
is
.
-
place the standard rectangle and fastened some typical sections symmetrical
of
of
With
on
in
to
(I is
the axis about which the moment inertia
is
it
,
of
sired usually the neutral axis about the computed
of be
axis inertia The section modulus can
).
x
x
-
.
(
)
The average period found Using the directly from the simplified formulas
or
of
vibration Table
is
1
,
.
following equation from the Unit Properties Tables
of
of
the moment inertia the and
,
,
,
5
.
given cross section
of
calculated
is
In
,
-
,
must be found before solving for section modu
)
(I
period given section
of
of
Any
|
lus
?
td 10
-
S
(
).
.
..
.
..
(
)
|
of
of
)
inertia
.
Air has the period
no
of
effect vibration
on
It
.
Problem
9
Special Problems
Using previously
of
properties can be utilized meet the welded section
of
number
T
in
”
A
in
ing special problems associated with the moment of
7
a
its neutral axis first Figure
14
modulus located
is
members subjected compressive load
,
,
inertia
.
to
in
in
,
(#
.
1
)
Section Compression include the minimum the neutral axis from any refer
of
on
the distance
,
2
of 5
.
n
(
)
inertia product
of
moment inertia and moment this case the top horizontal face
of
ence axis the
in
,
,
of
of
Sum moments
SECTION MODULUS Total area
of
4
(S
.
section
n
Ā
“
by
75
15
(S
)
by the distance
(6
1
.5
15 1
· 5
.5 7
) .5
1 •
)
)
·
·
.
·
.
of
(
)
)I
.51
neutral axis
75 (
)
·
(
to
75
168
+
6
.5 .
.
_
22
+
9
0
.
11
S
..
..
..
(
)
56
=
5
.
"
14
FIGURE
15
"
k
Properties of Sections / . - 15
2 3
- EH ..94 1 94 "
Torsional resistance ( R ) has largely replaced
the less accurate polar moment of inertia in stand
ard design formula for angular twist of open sec
9 .44 " tions . It should be employed where formulas have
been developed for the type of section . These are
given in the later Section 3 .6 on Torsion .
942
15
In = 6 +
)
-
.
.
1
5
(1
.5
·1
)+
+
12
68
69
22
84
208 421
=
+
1
.
.5
700 because depth of section was made cases , the property of the section varies as the
in
=
.4
I
instead
15
14
=
9
d
.
.
"
"
the
,
S
(
)
SEē
=
+
=
S
44
9
.
75
in
=
3
.
RADIUS OF GYRATION
5
0
(
)
.
)(1
is
)
(r
an imaginary point
1777
to
a
in
found
It
.
the moment
section and expressed inches
is
in
in
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
Error
12
.
...
..
..
.(.
)
(
J)
inertia
20
15
10
%
%
(
J)
right
5
depth
to
Ratio thickness
(d
)
(t
)
each other
to
is
to
in
is
.
plane
of
.
2 3 . - 16 / Load and Stress Analysis
xx
Section
X - - - - X
X- E - X
Ix -- - +
+ - X
x + x
-
12tdº
td td
4b
td 3d
6b
+
>
+
to
b 4
b
) dd
2
b
(4
b
p3
td
( (
’
’
|
)
)
(
td
d+
)
|
(
?
)
+
d
|
(?
3
b
+
)d
+
+
3
2
(b
4
(b
d
)
)
d +
d
4
b
) d
4b
?
t
2b
td
td
+
(
+
d
)
3
d
+
6
2
b
(
3b
td
6b
td
ta
tà
4b
td
(
+
)
d
(
+
)
d
+
2
b
(4
3
d
d
?
?
(
)
(
+
)d
+
3
b
2
2
b
d
(
)
top bottom bottom
by
+
3
4
b
d
t
)
+
4
b
d
(
)
4d
+
b
3
b
?
t
)
+
2
2
(b
d
)
right side
tb
6d
tb
3
(6
(b
d
)
)
+
t6
+
(3
4
b
d
)
left side
.
da
b2
t
0
+
4
(b
d
)
da
tb2
2
)2a
2ta
25
(b
d
d
)
(
)
(6
+
(
)
+
c
+
+
b
d
+
d
(4
b
6b
'
+
+ +
3
b
?
d
d d
d
(
12 ?
( (
) )
12
max
)
7071
0
.
r
.
12
+
V
2
b
(b
or
)
+
b
+
2
(b
d
)
min
.
da
d2
da
+
2
b
d
(
)
2d
+
2
b
b
(
top
b2
d
)
b3
12 ba
3d ba
+
+
d
(b
(b b
|
)
/
(
min
12
2b
12
.
+
V
+
d
(b
)
6
2
(b
(
or
)
)
)
max
.
to
add for
=
S
c
(*
)
/
simplify the problem the section may The error calculating the moment of inertia
be
To
in
,
by.
the line
is
16
to is
in
a
“
,
of .
the section property within very narrow tolerance the error increases with the ratio section thick
a
(d
)
)
(t
In
-
,
= =
=
,
,
t d
in
6
.
.
Properties of Sections / 2. 3 - 17
kl
=tdkb2b (+k (+k +1) 1+)22dbd +
td =
3 p k =
I
- - -
d (b + d) d (k b + d)
TE - - -
Cb Ci =
--
b ( k + 1) + 2 d b ( k + 1) + 2d
tuku
bd
taſk
25d
3
(
)
-
*
+
+
1
2
b
+
b
d
taſk
25d
kb k
1
1
b
(
)
+
+
=
S
+
d
ko td tb d2
tbd
=
31°2
1
-
.I
12
3k
13
.-
+
)+
–
1
=
å
k
3k bda
k3
3k
+
+
1
?
–
t
(
)
da
2cd
+
+
a
?
+
+
2
d
(a
it
X
-
-
-
cd
a3
da
3cd
+
+
2
d
a
?
?
)?
t
(
4 t(
I
+
b
d
(a
)
by
2
.5
.
(
Column
sional Problem Sect
in
Beam
3
3
.6
)
Table
7
L1
=
at
Reference Sections
6
,
7
5
7
.6
7
7
.
Thin Curved
(
"
,
16
=
N
N
3
"
/
10
Problem
=
N
4
d
"
at
supported
of
,
6
exerts force
it
F
(
)
Figure FIGURE
an
.
. -
2 3 18 / Load and Stress Analysis
Ix = 4 (3 b + d )
d = 94" N
.
= 6 5 in .
WM
A new model of this machine must extend out to
a distance of 18 . 5 ft . and must operate under the
same conditions and allowables . It is decided the
new beam will have a width equal to half its depth
FIGURE 18
and a wall thickness equal to 5 % of its depth .
I3
PL
dº
02083
13
22
( .(
))
() )(
) )
.
or
and
=
Thus
=
(
E
:
dº
02083 190
in
=
.5
.
.
ICE 190
(, (1) )
.5
d4
=
9140
=
02083
or
la
=
1
and
:
60
d2
95
=
15
.
=
6
3
Therefore Figure
18
in
190
=
.5
.
:
78 (
)
or or
use
=
9
9
3
4
d
/
"
"
the lengthened
of
of
inertia
89
use
=
beam
4
4
7
8
b
/
"
"
.
.
desirable
or
to
=
it
1
2
/
"
"
.
t
:
Load
Load
19
FIGURE
Properties of Sections / . - 19
2 3
Shear
axis
The resisting
shear force flow
Shear in the section
axis
FIGURE 20
9 . SHEAR AXIS AND SHEAR CENTER ( P ) applied in line with the principal axis (y - y )
does not result in any twisting action on the mem
Since the bending moment decreases as the ber . This is because the torsional moment of the
distance of the load from the support increases , internal transverse shear forces ( > ) is equal
bending force fi is slightly less than force f2 ,
to zero .
and this difference (f2 – fi ) is transferred inward
toward the web by the longitudinal shear force ( fs ) . On the other hand , in the case of an unsym
See Figure 19. metrical section , B , the internal transverse shear
forces ( > ) form a twisting moment . Therefore ,
the force ( P ) must be applied eccentrically at a
f. = fó + Pay . . . . ( 14 ) proper distance ( e ) along the shear axis , so that
it forms an external torsional moment which is
equal and opposite to the internal torsionalmoment
This force equal component in the
also has an of the transverse shear forces . If this precaution
transverse direction . transverse force applied
A is not taken , there will be a twisting action applied
to a beam sets up transverse ( and horizontal) to the member which will twist under load , in
shear forces within the section . See Figure 20 . addition to bending . See Figure 21 .
In the case of a symmetrical section , A , a force Any axis of symmetry will also be a shear axis .
Vertical
er
Member will
Only
FIGURE 21
2 .3 – 20 / Load and Stress Analysis
IDEOS
ZZZ
Nr
x
-
NT Common neutral
axis
*
*
-
Shear
'
FIGURE
22
center
H
-
Reference
axis
y
-y
will be two shear axes and their inter individual parts are used
of
There Just as the areas
section forms find theneutral axis
the moments of inertia
to
the shear center now
,
Q
.
(
)
is of of
used find the shear axis
to
the shear center may be
at
force applied
if
,
,
composite section Figure The procedure
A
22
,
at plane the cross section and
a
of
any angle
.
the
in
de
-
(y
y
),
;
on
a
the member
-
,
termine for each member section about its
Ix
just transverse shear bending
(
and
own neutral axis and the distance this
.
X
x
-x
)
As stated previously unless forces which are member section lies from the reference axis
,
applied transverse member also pass through The resultant the formula will
to
(y from
e
a
-
)
.
(
)
the shear axis the member will be subjected then be the distance from the chosen reference
to
,
twisting moment as well as bending result the parallel shear axis the built
of
As axis
to
(y
y
,
a
-
.
)
as
up section
be
The applied .
be
P
.
1x2
1x3 1x3
1x4
force Ixı X1 X2 X3 X4
a
=
'
+ +
1x4 +
shear center and parallel the original applied
e
1x2
to
(Q
)
1x1
+
force then resolved into the two components
is
P
P
'
.
each other
to
to
and the or
:
principal axes
of
the section
.
15
ΣΙ
=
A
2
e
.
(
)
)
(
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
(
)
.
the stresses
of
force
P
'.
of
Shear
Q
,
For
on
follows
as
Elx
IX
XX
<
=-
ee
5
Ι,
Σ
EM
or
-
d
ΣΑ Here
:
EA
ΣΑ
*0
+
x
_*
EL
.
.
*
built
of
find twº
tt
+
is
d
a
24 (
)
up
section
IX
.
Properties of Sections / . -
2 3 21
Normally Q might be assumed to be at the or, since areas have a common (x -x ) neutral axis :
i 'X0
intersection of the centerlines of the web and the
mby
flange . td X0 +
+ 2 x (b tr)(d/2)
2xch
e - EIX
Σ ΙΧ
Y
bº dº tt
4 IX
ЕС
- - - ( x - x)
в
Shear
I AHHHH center
ZPZHX
FIGURE 24
Here , at point M ;
, Vay ( )( / )
V btr d 2
FIGURE 25
V b2 d tr
F = 1/2 fs b = ?
41x Here :
1x2
EIXX Ix10 + X2
& Mn = 0 = + Fd – Ve = 0
e =
e
1x1
+
1x2
Fd
da
b2
ti
V
= XzIv2
=
41x
y
e
V
da
b2
ti
an
26
to
some other typical sections
B
IX
of
axes
4
FILTR
it
--
--
It
-
-
-
-
FIGURE
26
2 . 3 - 22 / Load and Stress Analysis
cd C
-WESTINGHOUSE
LETOURNEAU
-
LATOURNUB
ESTI
PULL
HOOL SCRAPER
Analysis of Tension
. . . . . . . . . . ( 2)
where :
where P = the tensile force applied to the member
E = unit elongation ( tensile strain )
A = area of cross - section at right angles to
o = unit tensile stress
line of force
0 = unit tensile stress E = modulus of elasticity ( tension )
Problem 1
K24
01
(
E
at
000
000
€ È
,
=
,
1
2
x
= 30
"
"
/
000444
in
elongation load of
in
=
.
./
is
,
a
.
10
000 reached
is
lb
,
000444
.
and elon
=
=
2
0
''
e
·
.
.
.
2
(
)
"
"
0
.
(2
)
elongation
or
it
000
,
P
,
=
.
=
142
of stress longer proportional and the
no
strain
is
to
psi
13
.
. -
2 4 2 / Load and Stress Analysis
Analysis of Compression
... (2 )
short column ( slenderness ratio L / r equal to
A
about unity or less ) that is overloaded in compres
sion may fail by crushing . From a design stand is made longer , using the same
If the member
point , short compression members present little
cross - section and the same compressive load , the
problem . It is important to hold the compressive resulting compressive stress will remain the same ,
unit stress within the material ' s compressive although the tendency for buckling will increase .
strength .
The slenderness ratio increases as the radius of
For steel , the yield and ultimate strengths are gyration of the section is reduced or as the length
considered to be the same in compression as in of the member is increased . The allowable com
tension . Many pads , feet, and bearing supports are pressive load which may be applied to the member
short compression members and must not be decreases as the slenderness ratio increases .
stressed beyond their elastic limit . Permanent de
The various column formulas ( Tables 3 and 4 )
formation of such members may cause misalign give the allowable average compressive stress (0 )
ment of critical working members of the machine .
for the column . They do not give the actual unit
Any holes or openings in the section in the path stress developed in the column by the load . The
of force translation will weaken the member , unless unit stress resulting from these formulas may be
such openings are completely filled by another multiplied by the cross - sectional area of the column
to give the allowable load which may be supported .
its
RADIUS OF GYRATION
failure by buckling As compressive loading
3
.
cause
.
of long column increased eventually causes The radius gyration the distance from
is
of
. is
it
,
a
(
)
r
up
some eccentricity This turn sets bending the neutral axis section imaginary point
of
an
in
to
a
at
moment causing the column deflect buckle which the whole area
to
,
slightly This deflection increases the eccentricity centrated and still have the same amount
of
inertia
.
.
by
and thus the bending moment This may progress the expression
is
found
=
It
A
1
is .
.
:
/
r
at
a
as
of
)
.
of of
be
to
SLENDERNESS RATIO
L
(
)
r
.2
formulas
.
more slender
or
As the member becomes longer the section question not standard rolled
is
in
If
,
more tendency for ultimate failure section the properties of which are listed
of
there steel
is
to to
in
a
by
. ................... ...(3)
Imin = . . . . . . . . . . ( 3) offset T section shown in Figure 2 :
| Α.
DATdTM
FIGURE 1
. . . . . . . . . . (4 )
+
1
6
.0
1
5
9
.0
x
.
"
"
be
|
possible
6
.0
6
0
"
"
x
will
it
find Imin
to
0
9
.
Total
12
.0
=
16
-"
NA5
20
"
k
-1
.5
75
: 1
.
M
"
=
=
+
XIT
1
T
"
of
Product Inertia
will be necessary find the product of inertia
to
It
)Ixy
of
A
.
(
(
in )
product Figure
dy
as shown
of
dx
distances and
3
.
3
.5
"
ASL
of
of
an
area about
In
"
1
|
. is
, of or
to
it dx )ly
it
,
a
inertia
is
to
of product
dy
because the
of
The
.
product
of of
of
inertia having
75
+
4
"
.
of
an
lar area
of
x
x
-
and axes
is
y
y
-
-
-
Analysis of Compression / . -
2 5 3
'y 'xy
dia
de
” = A 2 = A de = A
of
inertia Product inertia
about x - x axis about y- y axis about and axes
y
-y
x
-x
+
,
d
k
,
d
-
+
d
+
d
Lx
x
,
+
0
T
3rd
1st
4th
Quadrant 2nd Quadrant Quadrant Quadrant
dy
'ny
dy
'xy
do
do
dy
dy
dy
'xy
'xy
=
=
A
-A
d
=
A
-A
FIGURE
3
02 Problem
2
of
of
inertia this offset
section about the and axes
abcd
y
y
T
x
x
'xy
:
-
-
=
5
"
-
+ 555
"
.
1
FIGURE
4
25
1
"
.
where rectangle
.0
1
of
"
and dimensions
= =
=
A
c b
a
center of gravity
of
-y 's
25
dx
dy
axes
to
"
the
.
-
-
and and
=
y
x
x
-
The product
of
or
695
a
T
"
-
-
is
-
-
25
1
-
"
.
1918
945
+
-
.
"
1
FIGURE
6
adt
2c
td
À (d
(a
_
la –
)
t)
.6
Ixy
..
)dy
EA
-
dx
=
(
)
(
25
555 695
=
+
2
5
1
-
(-
.
.
(
)
(
FIGURE
5
388 737
=
+
+
1
1
.
inspection
by
=
+
3
.
.
.
. -
2 5 4 / Load and Stress Analysis
Now use
of inertia of
formula given previously for product
sucha section :
NA
, A = + 20 = + 75: ."
and -
I _ a d t (d - 2c) (a + t)
4 (a + d ) Iy = 1 32 . 00 – 6 . 75 = 25 . 25 in .
_ (4 ) (5 ) (V2) (5 - .
2 5) / )
(4 + 12
4 (4 + 5)
Product of inertia :
= + 3 . 125 in .
Ixy
)dy
EA
dx
=
(
)
(
1x6
75
75
75
75
=
+
1
1
x
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
. .
| Problem
)
(
)
.
-
.
.
3
15
75
of in
=
.
Determine the minimum radius of gyration of the Minimum moment inertia
re
:
offset section shown previously Fig and
T
2
(
)
.
peated here
:
ley
61
)*,
Imin
+
1
+
1
. (-
. 1.
=
55
25
25
25
,
55
–
25
25
+
25
–
(
.
–
.
15
)*
75
(
+
)
XT
WHITE
"1
21
T
75
25
40
—
LINNI
.
.
75
.1
I
"
50
18
in
=
.*
.
N
1
.3
5
"
"
75"
1
of
.
:
min
rmin =
542
findi
. 1
50
18
=
.
=
75
}
"
24
=
1
.
FIGURE
7
is
rmin
',
a
x
x
'-
of
–
)
of
AdTMTITIE
x
-x
:
Ixy
tan
V 20
Ix 2
-
=
20
1336
=
1
-
– 15
25 75
50
.
25 (
05
X
6
6
0
0
.
0
"
"
1
.
26
=
55
.
21
73
.18
00
8° 4°
6°
20
66 46
+
or
1
6
.
-
-
"
"
3
5
0
.
.
x
|
5
.
133
=
+
–
and
+
=
0
.
12
21
Total
92
00
-
-
.
.
0
occur
to
Nu
52
x
-
.
(
'
')
75
M
=
.
"
-1
and "
–
=
6
b
00
55
25
92
36
75
Ix
in
AM
1
’
-
=
.
=
–
.“
of
.
.A
y
-y
:
-
-
-
-
ON
=
=
\"
4
"
t
Is
M
|
|A
L
|
|
d
=
,
5
5
"
.
b
-
Nd
13
"1
.18
6
00
"
x
6
0
.
+
1
5
.
9
+
00T010
.
|
.5
|
75
,
=
3
"
.
50
"6
X
"
1
. .6
.
|
01
Total
12
00
32
FIGURE
-
|
»
»
|
+
+
.
.
9
0
8
Analysis of Compression / 2 5 . -5
its
of
a column. Determine radius
its axis
X
x
-
2b
Vd3
)
d
(
/3
rv
=
Using the conventional formulas proper
2d
for the
+
b
of
-
-
75
8753 875
+
3
3
2
5
3
x
.
.
(
)
/
of
75
875
:
+
5
2
3
.
.
(
)
bd bıdı
75
375
in
=
=
A
(6
(4
(5
.5
.2
)
)
)
(
)
–
-
.
279
.1
"
of
dat
+
2
is
279
db
n
bidi
1
r
.
"
2
2
–
is
1
.
.
"
25
25
+
)
?
(.
.5 .5
)
(5
)
(6 (
.
(4 (4
) )
of
-a
1000
in
+
a
75
2
(5
)(
)
–
of
would be
it
,
possible get answer as high
as
an
283 and as
to
764
1
=
"
"
2
.
an
of
275 about
1
.
.
"
of the error using the conventional formulaswith
of
Moment inertia
14
:
.
==
-2
minutes
II
A
(d
n
)2
-
.
3
)25
25
2
4
(
3 +
):
.(
3375
5
.
-+
(
5
(.
)
)'
_
764
4
(
-
2
.
2
)
-
539
in
=
5
.
T
Radius gyration
of
-
:
KX
=
r
539
5
.
у
у
375
3
.
FIGURE
10
281
=
1
.
"
slide rule had been used assuming possible Inertia About Any Axis
of
Moment
If
,
a
at of
as 336 Sometimes as Problem the moment
1
in
"
.
3
(
)
This represents error
an
, of
an
needed about
%
X an
+
ertia section
is
,
1
4
3
.
.
"
For this reason necessary when using angle with the conventional axis This may
it
is
%
6
.6
(0
x
-
.
-
of
these conventional formulas make use found by using the product of inertia
)Ixy
be
of
to
the
,
y
y
(x
x
-
-
)
requires about
30
minutes
of
(
)
(
)
The radius
,
Ixy
sin
1x
Ixcos20 sin2
Iy
@
=
0
|
(7
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
..
.
.
)
75
=
5
"
b
.
-
Ixy
Iy
Iy
+
0
0
?
..
..
..
..
..
..
.(
8
)
14
=
"
t
by
as
875
=
The critical
3
d
given
on
column
.
"
load the
a
Euler formula
is
-
-
WHHHHA
THIHA
9
)
.
.
(
.
.
.
... ..
.
.
...
...
..
...
.
....
.
FIGURE
Le
)
.
.
2 5 – 6 / Load and Stress Analysis
Il = l.
Le = 2L
L. = 1/ 2 i 11 = .7L
7
fixed fixed
FIGURE 11
This can be changed into terms of average critical The modified formula then becomes –
stressby dividing by the cross -sectional area of the column .
Since A = I / ra, this becomes –
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( 11 )
#2 E
.. ... .. ( 10)
O cr –
Le/ r) where Ei = tangent modulus of elasticity , corresponding to
the modulus of elasticity when stressed to Ocr .
Because this formula gives excessively high values
for short columns , Engesser modified it by substituting r = least radius of gyration of the cross -section
the tangent modulus ( El) in place of the usual Young 's Le = effective length of the column , corresponding
modulus of elasticity ( E ) . to the length of a pinned column that
would have the same critical load . See
--E,= -
106
Figure 11 .
20x106
Stress-StrainCurve
(Compression 25X
The Engesser formula
) T- 1 Steel
also called the Tangent
is
=
,=
Eq Modulus formula and checks well with experimental
--
15x106
values
.
L -E,=
-
LE
12x106
TANGENT MODULUS
POO
5
.
- E-
's
Use
po
------
in
a
)
10x106
of the material See Figure stress strain curve
12
,
.
,)
IŤ
Young elasticity represents
of
modulus fixed
-
a
's
-E -E,
8x106
-, +
according
of
value for steel the ratio
ksi
30
to
106
x
(
(
ac
,
-- -
of
--
6x106
tion the changing effect
point corresponding the actual stress involved
to
the
in
,
4X106
,
elasticity
of
psi
up
106
x
value applies
at
oc
2x106
+
E
a
E
(
)
-
parallel rule
-,
1X106
of
line dotted
or
means other
E
_
_
_
L
),
T
-
10
at
for
Le/ r Lelr
material can be superimposed on this graph and the Below the material ' s proportional limit , the use of
values of Ei at a given stress level ( oc ) read by the Young's modulus ( E ) or tangent modulus ( EI ) provide the
same technique . same value . Table 2 for T . 1 gives the slenderness ratio
within the proportional por
for
Oc
( Le/ r ) stress levels
(
)
tangent modulus
of
as
The values
Ei
for steel
the stress strain curve Since the original Euler
of
,
1
T
(
)
tion
read from Figure -
.
are now plotted against the cor
12
-
Ocr
applies here this portion
,
of
is
,
responding compressive stress This
oc
shown
in
is
.
Figure
13
.
The Engesser tangent modulus formula for critical PLOTTING ALLOWABLE STRESS CURVE
or
6
.
stress then put into the following form
is
Ocr
values Tables are
(
)
These
-
2
plotted the curve Figure The Euler
14
of to
form
in
.
portion extended upward by broken
is
12 the curve
)
(
a
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
to
Le
)
/
resulting
of
stress and
),
2
(
Stressfor
-
-1
T
suitablefactorof safety
(A
be
gives corresponding applied
to
Table values slenderness must thesevalues)
of
1
stress
/
r
(
(
)
portional limit
of
T
1
-
.
Euler
Tangent
Modulusfor Steel
-1
T
140 Le
in
)
(
1305
130
30x106
Engesser
-
25
X106
ksi
stress och
psi
(
modulus Erl
20X106
Critical compressive
Test results
Tangent
15X106
Criticol stress
10X106
t
Allowable stress
factor safety
of
1
.8
(
5X106
110
100
120
140
20 40
70
90
50
60
80
20
30
40
10
), 60
80
)
13
FIGURE FIGURE
14
.
2 5 – 8 / Load and Stress Analysis
000
325
0 - 140 0 - 155
000
253
*=
, 15
*
=
(
)
-
.
(5
-.
)
15
33
000
,
000
15
15
- 000
P
.
,
140 200 155 200
-
-
860
,
370
15
0
. 5
(
)
+
, 20
+
)
, .05
(5
126
17
800
800
47
,
137
143
17
-
-0
*
=
=
.-
-
(
)
(
)9
40 000
800
,
PE
,
17
17
000
,
_
-
-
=
900
000
,
, 16
13
+
.
(
)
0
5
0
5
(5
.
)
+
500
605
20
120 135
500
,
20
47
0
,
-
*
=
(
-
.
-
0
(5
)*
=
45
500
000
,
20
, , 20
500
,
. -
p
930
630
,
14
11
0
5
(
)
+
0
5
(3
, .
)
+
110
738
125
574
500
500
22
, 22
-0
(5
-.
*)
*
=
)
- 0
(5
-.
50 000
,
22
500
22
,
,
500
_
P
125
200
110 200
-
-
460
440
,
, 10
13
0
5
(5
.
)
. *
(H
*
+
+
, 0.5
1902
000
702
120
105
105
000
,
00-
25
25
-0
=
-
-
(5
)
=
-
(
)*
5
55
,
000
25
25
000 000
,
,
Il
AI
220
510
,
12
+
.
.
)
0
5
0
5
(1
.
(
)
+
102
116
500
500
82
,
,
26
26
05
- 0
-.
-
*
0
(5
.
(
)
)
=
=
60 000
,
26
26
500 500
,
,
116
.
102 200
200
1
120
-
(
L
?
)
(13
11
)
.
3
5
0
.
.0
+
2006
+
5
*
and Gilligan
by
for
"
.
)
of
on
on
1
.8
.
.
Analysis of Compression / 2 5. - 9
0 =
Civil Engineers ASCE as
200
of
of
result extensive Cc
),
to
a
(
research
,
it
,
.
series
of
a
where
,
:
272
workable form
20E
,
, 5
Cs
=
The column formulas Table have been
in
H
”
.
(
,
A
000
to
,
a
60 000 psi
of
safety
of
1
.8
.
of
factor
1
a
.
in
;
.
higher strength steels Figure in
)
by the use
up
of
eveloped formulas
15
92
max The earlier
15
to
%
,
1
.
.
-
.)
on (
-d
dicates the allowable compressive stress safety
of
of
from Table uniform
g
1
.8
a
.)
(
)
of
When the effective length known the value Le
.2
is
,
.
"
in "
Notice that the advantage of the higher strengths should be substituted for the above formulas
:
drops off as the column becomes more slender
.
the allowable
stress curve long columns built for
14
If
1
T
-
.
(
lower slender
at
,
4
.5
1
T
-
ness ratios would be readily apparent feet and legs are illustrated the same section
in
.
(
)
.
for
000
,
,g)
50
Jy
000
,
-
FIGURE
15
ksi
(
stress
940 000
,
Allowable compressive
33 000
=
y
/ 110
170
180
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
or
to
of
Elements
and
Adapted from 1961AISC Sec
.19
.1
1
.9
.2
.
400
2,
1 Single Double angle
-
angle with separator
Rolled
column
b
Fabricated
column
or beam Double angle
Plate projecting
contact
in
from column
Rolled tee
Cover plate
b
ITT
M
(
up
Built
-
SSSSSSSS
CS
Fabricated column
P
)
box
column
or
beam
Accesshole
FIGURE
16
IM
Use net
sectionfor
compression
WA
by
be
in
these limits the compressivestress value obtained within the allowable stress.
of
maximum
is
,
6
(
AISC COLUMN FORMULAS are not applicable the basic formulas while
10
,
)
8
-
-
.
Steel Con
of
The 1961 AISC American Institute some work with than those of Table which were
to
(
struction specifications for structural buildings developed from the earlier ASCE investigation
)
recent Column Research Council Report great Figure curves will be sufficiently accurate
or
15
of A
to
.
struc
of
their use
tural columns was developed including the use
of
.
,
Figure
-
limiting ratio
of
is
,
The column formulas Table resulting from thickness This ratio expressed as being
is
to
,
,
4
(b
).
t
/
or
designing
be
%
in
a
(
)
machinery where the most precise values the square root the material yield strength The
of
classes
of
's
are required for safety long slender columns permits direct reading com
on
of
related Table
,
a
:
or for maximum economy low slen pression ratio for various yield
on
of
columns element
b
s
. '
t
/
strengths
of
At times it may be desirable to exceed the limit The allowable compressive unit stress ( ) for a
ing b / t ratio of an element . This can be done if, in given slenderness ratio ( L / r ) , from unity through
the calculations , substituting the shorter maximum 200 , is quickly read from Tables 6 through 10 for
width allowed (by the Fig . 16 limits ) would give a steels of various yield strengths .
compressive unit stress value within the allowable
stress . Above L / r of 130 , the higher - strength steels
offer no advantage as to allowable compressive
To help in visualizing the variance in using these stress ( g ) . Above this point, use Table 7 for the
newer formulas , Figure 17 indicates the allowable more economical steel of 36 , 000 psi yield strength .
compressive stress ( g ) obtained from the above
formulas for five different yield strengths . When
compared to corresponding curves of Figure 15 , it TABLE 5- LIMITING b / + RATIOS OF SECTION
will be seen that the new formulas offer considerable ELEMENTS UNDER COMPRESSION
possible economy of material when the slenderness
ratio is low , and a somewhat more conservative Limits of ratio of width to thickness of compression elements
value when the slenderness ratio is high , for different yield strengths of steel
2,400
Figure 3.000 4.000 10, 000
16
Ratio
Allowable Compressive
Stress ( g ) V Oy
Basedon 1961AISC Sec1. 5. 1. 3
33
11 12 13 13
14 15 16 16
22
46psi psi
000
,
25050
000
=
,
= 000
,
21
42 36
30 9
000
000
9 , psi
,
,
,
9
19 20
, psi
000
42
,
,)5
000
=
,
+ 9
, PSI
36
46
000
=
000
( ,
A
ksi
psi
19
33
XD
000
18
=
,
50 000 13
,
stress
Allowablecompressive
Abovethis ratiouse
Table for steel
7
36
000 psiyield
of
,
strength
FIGURE
17
IH
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200
Slenderness
ratio
/1
(L
)
. -
2 5 12 / Load and Stress Analysis
970
120
970
150
940
100
280
260
970
210
230
430
060 119 900
480
540
550
890
550
770
400
510
570
970
910
180
470
320
660
210
270
230
830
11 810
430
440
730
010
530
530
730
660
100 9 020210 580 340
108 76 5 4
,,,, , , , , ,,,,,
272625 24 2221
,, ,, ,. ,,,,,,,9
18 1614 1210 29 282725 2422 21191714 1210
19
1108
19
060
960
310
420
110
370
800
430
750
720
210
410
110
980
570
780
720
510
400
350
11 940
290
660
440
110
670
080
570
230
250
580
710
810
620
640
840
820
530
720
230 8 090290330 170
109 65 5 4 4
,,,, |, , , ,,,,,, ,, ,, ,, ,,,,,,,9
272625 24 2221 2018 1614 1210 29 282726 2423 21191715 1210
18
2609
18
380
970
250
330
960
220
350
220
910
490
600
580
150
520
23 090
720
850
610
810
610
420
260
960
770
270
850
040
060
070
910
690
560
710
610
710
740
780
7 300 350 7 160 430 500 390 910260
97 65 44
17
steel
4109
370
100
960
steel
230
470
860
380
390
200
580
520
290
140
540
23 350 23 220
760
030
800
790
070
320
710
410
700
420
890
670
steel
790
480
220
810
840
500
850
820
630
670
410
010
830
350 170
170 100
544
24 55024450
|
5 , ,, ,. , , , , ,,,
272625 21 20181715 1311 29 282726 23 21 1917151311
,
21 202019 181716 151413 12 10
yield
11024
16
5609
yield
yield
9303
360
380
930
550
000
990
360
640
210
100
220
530
990
290
990
750
280
900
900
880
660
800
510
550
850
580
600
330
840
530
940
550
490
790
890
,
780
,
300 290
190
9 560
,
5 390 5
9 7 5 4
,,, . , , ,,,,,,,9
272625 22 20181715 1311 psi
4 , , ,, ,, , , , , ,,,
2726 2523 21 1917 151311
4,, , , , , , ,,,, , , , , , , ,
psi 21 202019 181716 151413 12 10 psi 29
T
900128
,,
AISC
9703
140
390
580
100
190
550
23 480
200
060
320
300
630
730
24 680
260
680
640
020
350
990
040
900
11 260 11 130
200
930
710
860
720
010
720
550
770
950
470
730
710
440
860
700
410
000
( 36-7 3,,,,,,,,,,, _, , , . ,6 ,,4 ,,4 –9 ,,, , ,,, , ,,,,,9
650
-
360 490 490
000
000 4 98765 4 2220191715 1311
3 , , ,, ,, , , , , ,,,
272625 24 29 282726 2523 22 2018161311
1961
21 20 19 18 1717 161413 12
46 50 1
41020
8709
0103
280
260
380
830
790
990
300
460
790
690
870
970
400
380
000
950
140
560
800
200
120
600
830
410
690
000
990
770
290
480
850
440
880
020
590
620
730
3420720 740
080 840
987 5 4 9
,,, , , , , , ,,,,,
272625 24232220 191715 1311 10
2, , , , , , , ,,, , , , 2, , ,, ,, , , , , ,,,
21 2019 18 1817 161513 12 29 282726 2523 22 2018161411
, , , , ,5 ,,4
)(0 ,,|,,,,,,,, , , , ,,,, , ,, 1,,, , , , , , ,,,,,
VALUES
05021
240T
900
480
980
900
420
990
370
170
420
740
240
030
220
460
790
080
560
130
730
080
900
550
040
520
480
570
410
050
400
990
050
510
500
030
610
800
690
720
TABLE
TABLE
2 930 930
TABLE
970 870 900030
9 8 765 4 272625 242322 20191715 1311 10
1, , ,, ,, , , , ,,,,
21 21 2019 19 1817 161513 12 11 29 292826 2524 22 2018167411 10
1
8501
190
120
200
21 130
110
560
910
110
330
870
010
200
330
540
580
29 260 29 170
190
100
240
140
020
190
540
260
550
760
090
030
750
470
11 540
700
560
940
850
810
560
870
090
510
550
720
690
1 7 65 5 4 8 4
120 120
|
, , , , , ,,,, ,
272626 2523 22
,
1917161412 10
, T
,
27 2524 2220 18161412 10
, ,, ,, , , , , ,,,
21 21 2019 19 1817161514 12 10 29
,
, , , , , , ,, , , , , , ,5 ,5 , ,4 ,3
30028
370
300
120
170
140
970
21 280
080
190
950
740
160
940
350
280
350
980
830
940
690
830
670
840
640
720
940
430
430
610
730
010
710
600
620
COMPRESSIVE
r/L | | | r/L
5 4
r/L
ratio
8 7
ratio
ratio
21 201919 18 17161514 121110 26 252322 191816 1412 10 2827 2524 2220 19167412
1026
12010
_
120
150
160
170
180
190
200
100
100
110
120
130
60
70
140
20 304050 8090100
60
70
910
770
980
210
150
370
460
12 490
730
730
230
420
780
070
430
510
530
660
21 100
210
970
910
000
610
090
550
710
-, .g)(
8103
360
330
230
290
900
980
110
850
710
140
520
260
840
12 600
090
820
350
640
070
240
220
750
860
500
030
840
290
550
720
610
030
8 760
| |
,8, ,,, ,,, , , ,,7 ,6 ,6 ,5 , ,4,3 ,,,, , ,,,, ,,,,
19 181717 16151413 11 10 24242322 2120181715 1412 10
,,
54019
offer
2609
350
10
960
270
220
910
850
920
080
220
440
700
740
060
160
880
450
770
21 330
010
economical
500
430
910
610
610
730
7 820150330390
9 |
,6 , ,,,, , ,,,, ,,,,9 stress
1919 1717 16151413 11 10 2424 22 20181716 1412 10
820 14
42023
4109
steel
140
130
980
320
280
100
420
steel
290
800
840
720
070
010
580
600
520
890
010
690
570
880
21 440
640
590
7
220 490 170 900
compressive
.
for the more
strength
-
yield
yield
9303
190
100
930
920
280
220
140
080
560
660
400
050
600
830
690
470
490
780
780
890
880
620
510
550
750
590
, ,
180 360 360 940
290 320 strength
9703
,,
110
360
470
470
230
920
430
980
800
590
320
300
860
030
950
200
270
910
550
410
990
710
680
930
590
21 660
520
020
660
710
690
000
allowable
- -
250
use Table
000
,,,, , ,,,,,,,,9
1919 18 1817 161514
1414 1311 10 20191716 1413 11
,,, ,, , , ,, , ,, ,9 ,8 ,7 ,6 ,5 ,4,4,4 8
24242322
yield
the
33 42
0103
/rL ,
180
950
300
380
400
870
280
130
920
990
060
060
440
21 770
770
130
460
680
780
650
500
430
640
620
070
6
070
720
620
690
760
3 050 to
130
420
psi
230
240
170
460
880
870
760
530
770
590
830
030
160
230
840
410
840
030
230
040
050
690
510
730
570
050
820
TABLE
TABLE
advantage
,,,, , ,,,,,,,,
25242322 21 20191816 1513 11 10
, , , ,,, , ,, , , , ,9 ,8 ,7 ,6 ,5 ,5 ,4,4
1919 18 1817 16161514 131211
of
Above
390
300
320
340
200
110
970
980
760
Above
370
280
010
150
996
870
660
120
920
330
560
770
880
640
250
550
760
700
090
840
510
steel
150
,
570 920
no
,,, , ,,,,,,, ,
20191816 1513 12 10
,,,,, , ,, , , ,, ,8 ,7 ,6 ,5 ,5 ,4,43
1919 181817 16 161514 1312 11 242322
125
08021
550
420
990
480
930
190
200
360
990
380
170
410
340
430
270
140
790
930
710
630
830
090
620
640
830
610
060
920 060 370
730
ratio
ratio
/rL
19 181817 16 161514 13121110 23 2220 1817 1513 12 10
|
1024
2023
6019
120
110
Lr
170
110
120
150
160
100
130
140
50
180
190
Analysis of Bending
PL '
| M = PL V = P
Tensile Stress
Fixed end
3EI
Moment Free end
- Neutral Axis PL PL
Alla
M = A =
4 48EI
center center
Compressive Stress
VHP
ABEL
IPL
VE
M
=
-
s
FIGURE Fixed end
1
PL3
P2
=
V
P
=
M
A
=
Figure 12ET
The cantilever beam shown
in
is
in
DI
bottom contrast the relationship of the applied PL LA PL3
In
C
M
.
center center
Figure ends
&
is
is
2
I.PI
=
V
P
M
=
bottom and
in
Fire
.
5PL
tional elastic limit the bending
or
V
M
,
384EI
)
stress
0b
center
in
center
a
is (
)
beam
-
-
PL
olun
M
=
PL
185EI
M
=
8
-
-
Fixed end
1
(
)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
PL PL3
M
=
=
V
24EI
P
| A
Guided
=
24EI
|
pod
3
quided
Free
Fixed end guided end
PL3
NAS
=
12
384EI
M
=
Pe L2
Pe
M
=
ZEI
V
A
=
whole beam
right angles
force
to
FIGURE
2
.
2 6 –2 / Load and Stress Analysis
| Here::
Here 6 " T
I .
12 515 " - =1 . ":
47
62.6
WW1.47 " N .A. b = in
- 100 " .
5 , 000 lbs 5 , 000 lbs
bending (62. 6 )
stresses are somewhere inside a beam .
Usually the bending stress at the outer fiber is = 21, 845 psi (tension )
needed because it is of maximum value . In an un
symmetrical section , the distance c must be taken in The top portion of the beam being in compression ,
the correct direction across that portion of the sec
tion which is in tension or that portion which is in oc = MC
compression , as desired . Ordinarily only the max
imum stress is needed and this is the stress at the - (250, 000) (1.47)
outer fiber under tension , which rests at the greater 62 . 6
distance c from the neutral axis . , 870 psi ( compression )
= 5
Problem 1 Problem 2
to
and
1
,
M = PL therefore be
-
-
P13
EI
10
)(
į
48
( 10
000 100
30 ,
lbs
48 (
)
(
250 000
in
,
=
.-
106 62
.6
x
)
(
111
=
"
.
, ,
in
5
.
the
It
if
Sheets
,
(
portion
of
'
or
.
)
Analysis of Bending / . -
2 6 3
g
Unlike bending stress , the horizontal shear
stress is zero at the outer fibers of the beam and is
maximum at the neutral axis of the beam . It tends
to cause one part of the beam to slide past the other ,
Neutral
The horizontal shear stress at any point in the Axis
cross - section of a beam , Figure 6 , is - - FIGURE 6
T =
Vay
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2 )
It
(a) substituting the above values into the formula ,
where : the horizontal shear stress ( T ) is found :
This would be
fillet weld Based upon
486
11
"
16
1
5
94
.
"
"
/
6
"
.
to
If
"
,
FIGURE
7
the joint
of
be welded
would be to
:
100
,
the beam diagrams Table
From the appropri actual leg size of intermittent fillet weld used
*
,
,
is 1
be
056
.
18
-
%
16
=
/ 5
and thus
=
V
10
000
=
12
satisfy
16
V
3
/
-
2
the
it
%
in
000 length
=
5
,
TO
mined
.
be
to
-
-
BENDING LOADS
62
in
=
.6
.
12
18
486 515
in
=
=
1
.6
.2
a
x
.
727
=
y
Necessary rigidity
0
"
.
"
.
.
2 6 – 4 / Load and Stress Analysis
members for maximum strength and stiff On the other hand , the center area , which has 14
ness . times the area of the top and bottom outer areas ,
does not offer any more bending resistance .
4 . Place joints in low stress areas .
The net effect of placing material as far as
possible from the neutral axis is shown in Figure 9.
For efficient designs , material must be placed Its similarity to increasingly deeper “ I ” sections
where it does the most work per pound of metal . is evident.
The section of a member , therefore , must be select
ed within practical limits to provide the required Each of the areas has equal bending resistance ,
strength and rigidity . For example , a beam section if the web is disregarded . Flange area becomes
obviously should not be so deep to withstand vertical less as the section depth is increased . At first
loads with minimum sectional area , yet be too weak this indicates that a deep , thin section is best for
and flexible for horizontal transverse forces . Sec maximum resistance to bending per pound of metal .
ondly , a structural section must not be so thin as to
However , the practical limitation is given in
be impractical to fabricate .
Rule 2 , which says :
It is important, therefore , to know the limits to
which a designer can go in theory and where to stop RULE 2 . Avoid Reductions in Sectional Area Below
Requirements for Horizontal Stiffness
for practical reasons .
Each of the sections shown in Figure 10 has the
RULE Place Flanges as far as Possible from
1. same resistance to bending about the x - x axis . As
the Neutral Axis . Connect Flanges with Web Section the depth of the section increases , the area ( A )
decreases . As a result , the strength of the section
is decreasing also , since S = I/ cand cis increasing
as depth increases , but I remains constant .
This area = 10 % of
These 2 areas = 10 %
stiffness of whole
section , yet 14 times
stiffness of whole
the
as much area as
section
two outer areas
All have
of
FIGURE FIGURE
8
9
Analysis of Bending / 2 .6 - 5
u
100%
100%
x- - - r - -
X
-
-
-
-
+
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
HHO
I Vertical Strength Hvertical Strength
Areal
-
įHorizontal
istiffness realHorizontal stiffness
300 400
%
100 % 200 300
%
%
200 400
%
100
Depth
of
Depth
of
Section Section
FIGURE FIGURE
10
11
Since member designed for rigidity with
to
100
is 50
a
For strength
(
of
in
%
,
generally times stronger
a
stand deflection
10
is
55to
",
to
section these
In
than necessary prevent
E
F
of
.
to
respects
a
generally
B
reduced without exceeding
F
be
.
section can genera
the resulting area only
of
However section
is
graphs
as
to F
allowable stresses illustrated the
the original section area compared
in
of
25
the
%
%
9
of if 11
Figures
re
10
and
Horizontal bending
of
B
.
Figure Fis
the original compared
of
. of
the depth
10
made
of
to
,
twice the depth the initial square section zero the case
in
the
),
B
A
%
B
of
choosing flanged section instead
(
)
Thus
,
a
area but
. is
is
%
simple
A
in
B
.
(
)
the graph
To
a
of
of
cal load which leads the use flanged sections The deflection beam with concentrated load
to
a
..
.
Figure
1
4
have
in
. a in
As the depth
.
Deflection
12
table
the flange area drops off and the
,
tion increases
.
,
greatly increased
.
Strength
is
of
and those
, .
in
in
,
13
is
beam
,
In
a
.
.
2 6 – 6 / Load and Stress Analysis
lood
Load
1
t
f
Moment
Diagram DI
12
FIGURE
mood
ends
and
Moment
Mmexlate
)=
&
)=
Amon
102
Deflection
lei
=
. at
sketch shows the bending moment when loaded deflection the beam
in
.
midspan
at
midspan
at
Figure
.
14
shown
is
in
.
of
Beam
B
is
are rigidly connected the supporting col
A
(
by )
to
beam
yond its yield point and fails buckling
to it
If
result some
of
.
is
,
a
.
is
.
the column the rigid connection reduces the rigidly supported stressed
to
The beam
in
is
,
B
(
)
maximum bending moment the central portion of only psi and failing
28
is
,
.
the beam reducing turn the bending stress and
in
,
in
4
.
,
a
of of
the beam
WS
. .
These two points are called points inflection
Because bending stresses these points are almost
at
zero joint at this position does not require much
a
,
of of .
frequently practical fabricate beams
is
It
.
the background Figure is just such
of
15
In
a
FIGURE
13
FIGURE FIGURE
14
15
Analysis of Bending / . -
2 6 7
19
BEAM
-
FIGURE REQUIRED SECTION MODULUS OF
8
(
Strength Nomograph
/ Load
and
MAXIMUM 100000
,,
780 000
BENDING
E
(
SECTION MODULUIS
-
TOTAL LOAD FOOT POUNDS INCH POUNDS
ON
165
)(
-. 10
,
BEAM 000
29
000
-
1000
Stress Analysis
po 000
19
OF
100
+
LENGTH oo
. ,6
200
BEAM 000
000
10
4000
INCHES 000
. .
FEEI
OF
TYPE 60 000
2009 580000
BEAM 200 .
90005 100 000
,1
+
LOAD 4000
LOAD
9000
,1
Wullu
200 000 UNIT STRESS 000
__
0000
--
29000
)
BENDING PS1
29000
,
I oo
49000
10
000
MWMM
400 000
1000
SE69000 600 000
100000 690003E800 000 2000
-
m 1000
-- .
89
,,
100 209000 000 4000 000
--
,
100000 000
-
LALA
GUIDED gooo 000
--
LISTINO sogooo
.
MULI
10 20
.
-
000 000
400
04
114
--
-
000 000
600
00
--
mmmmmmmmm
,
000 000
-
sogoc
.,
10
000 000
--
S
-
,1
:
PROBLEM FIND THE REQUIRED SECTION MODULUS 000 000
.
OF THE FOLLOWING BEAM NOTE CAN ALSO USE THIS NOMOGRAPH
SOLVE FOR ALLOWABLE LOAD OR
TO
20
000000
OF
0
OF
.
INCHES
120
LENGTH BEAM
-
, ,, , . , , Ummu
S
KROL
40
000 000
10
ON
:
,
LOAD BEAM 000 POUNDS
000 000
opport
20
,
:
ALLOWABLE STRESS 000 PSI 69000 000
000 ood the
IN
S
.-
75
. - .. .2- 4. .6 ,6- . , , ,
80
000 oo logocg000
that
,4 . . ,
19000 000
Analysis of Bending / .
2 6 – 9
4 . QUICK METHOD FOR FINDING REQUIRED nomograph ( Fig . 20 ) an allowable unit deflection
SECTION MODULUS ( STRENGTH ) OR MOMENT (A / L) is This is the resulting deflection of
shown .
OF INERTIA (STIFFNESS ) the beam divided by the length of the beam . The
To aid in designing members for bending loads , stiffness property of the beam is read as moment of
the following two nomographs have been constructed . inertia (I) .
The first nomograph determines the required By these nomographs the designer can
using
strength of straight beam . The second nomograph
a quickly find the required section modulus ( strength )
determines the required stiffness of the beam . or moment of inertia ( stiffness ) of the beam . He can
then refer to a steel handbook to choose a steel sec
Inboth nomographs several types of beams are
tion that will meet these requirements .
included for concentrated loads as well as uniform
loads . The length of the beam is shown both in If he wishes to fabricate the section from welded
inches and in feet , the load in pounds . In the first steel , he may use any of the methods for building up
nomograph (Fig . 19 ) an allowable bending stress a steel section having the required values of section
(ob ) is shown and the strength property of the beam modulus or moment of inertia discussed in Prop
is read as section modulus ( S) . In the second erties of Sections .
SNYDER
SNYDER
SNYDER