Manuel R. Joson Jr. believes that mathematics is invented rather than discovered. He argues that in the debate, the terms "mathematics" and "natural phenomena" were not clearly defined. While natural phenomena like gas motion follow rules, mathematics is a system of symbols and logical operations that were invented by humans to help quantify and understand the physical world. Quantities only have meaning because humans assign them and agree on their meaning through shared understanding.
Manuel R. Joson Jr. believes that mathematics is invented rather than discovered. He argues that in the debate, the terms "mathematics" and "natural phenomena" were not clearly defined. While natural phenomena like gas motion follow rules, mathematics is a system of symbols and logical operations that were invented by humans to help quantify and understand the physical world. Quantities only have meaning because humans assign them and agree on their meaning through shared understanding.
Manuel R. Joson Jr. believes that mathematics is invented rather than discovered. He argues that in the debate, the terms "mathematics" and "natural phenomena" were not clearly defined. While natural phenomena like gas motion follow rules, mathematics is a system of symbols and logical operations that were invented by humans to help quantify and understand the physical world. Quantities only have meaning because humans assign them and agree on their meaning through shared understanding.
Although I acknowledge that mathematics can be considered both discovered and
invented, I personally think that mathematics is invented. Listening to the informal debate, there was a lack of identification of terms, most importantly, mathematics itself. The discovered side has given out an argument that mathematics is discovered because, in particle physics, molecules (mostly just ideal gases) follow a set of rules in kinetic motion. This is arguably a misconception as it implies that natural phenomena itself is mathematics, therefore, this lack of identification convoluted the whole debate and made no sense. I personally don’t believe that natural phenomena and mathematics are the same thing. I believe that we invented mathematics to understand natural phenomena. On the surface, mathematics is a set of symbols following logical operation systems that we invented. On the deeper end, these symbols perform to help us quantify the physical world. Quantities only exist if someone is counting them. There could be a thousand trees spawning in the physical realm, but if there is no intersubjective realm to believe that there are a thousand trees, that number merely is just a bunch of green living beings trying to live.