Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OY B I O L O G I C A L CHEMISTRY
Vol 465. No. 14. Issue of duly 25, pp 6640-6645, 1980
Printed m C!S A
Several enzymes that interfere with the enzy- aration and analysis ( 2 )and equilibrium labeling of pools with
matic assay of deoxyribonucleoside B’-triphosphates :12P(11).The HPLC methodis sensitive only down to 30 pmol
(dNTF”s)are present as contaminants when nucleotides (2), while ”tP-labeling procedures require long term labeling
are extracted fromHeLa cellswith 60% methanol. of cells and complex chromatographic separations. The .’lP
These activities include a nuclease, nucleoside diphos- method is also unsuitable for tissues.Therefore, theenzymatic
phokinase, and deoxyribonucleoside monophosphoki- procedure seems more suitable for rapid, sensitive assays of
nases which phosphorylate dAMP,dGMP, and dCMP. cells containing low levels of dNTP’s.
Collectively, these enzymes are able to degrade and In order to measure dNTP levels by any of these procedures,
reutilize the DNA template which is used together with the nucleotides must be efficiently extracted from cells. This
DNA polymerase for dNTP assays. This process intro-
extraction mustbe rapid so that cellular enzymes do not alter
duces large errors when dNTP assays are performed in
this manner. dNTP levels during the process, either by degradation or by
Attempts to block the enzymatic conversion of de- continued synthesis of dNTP’s. With the enzymatic assay,
oxyribonucleoside diphosphates to triphosphates by such cellular activities mustalso be completely removed from
inhibition of nucleoside diphosphokinase were unsuc- extracted samples to prevent t.heir interference during the
cessful because of the inability to block completely the assay reaction.
kinase activity. Several procedures for extracting nucleotide pools have
Acid extraction of nucleotides also resultsin the pres- been reported. The most commonly used include extraction
ence of an activity that interferes with the enzymatic with 60% methanol (4) or with acid. Acid-extraction proce-
dNTP assay. The error introduced by this interfering dures use perchloric acid (6), acidic ammonium formate (12),
activity is much smaller than that arising from the or trichloroacetic acid (13).
enzymes present in methanol extracts. All of these We havenoted somelargedifferences in dNTP levels
interfering activities are removed when cells are first measured in different laboratories on similar biological mate-
extracted with 60%methanol and the resulting extract rials. For example, in herpes simplex virus-infected cells, the
is subsequently treated with perchloric acid. levels of dCTP were reported to be more than 50-fold higher
by Jamieson and Bjursell (7) and by Roller and Cohen ( 8 ) ,
both of which groups used 60% methanol extraction, than by
Previous reports from this and other laboratories (reviewed Cheng et al. ( 6 ) ,who extracted with perchloric acid. Since all
in Ref. 1 ) have supported the existence of amultienzyme of these reportsused a similar enzymaticdNTP assay,we felt
complex containing the enzymes of DNA precursor biosyn- that the discrepancies were due to differences in extraction
thesis which suppliesdeoxyribonucleoside 5”triphosphates procedures. Different extraction efficiencies or thepresence of
during replication of bacteriophage T4. In aneffort to deter- interfering activities in any of the extracts could produce the
mine whether similar enzyme complexes exist in eukaryotic observed variation.
cells, we are attempting to determine the subcellular locali- For our studies DNA on precursor metabolism, it is essential
zation of dNTP’sl and the enzymes involved in their synthesis. that we accurately quantitate levels of these molecules. Ac-
Intracellular levels of dNTP’s are much lower than are cordingly, we have evaluated the enzymatic assay of dNTP’s
use of assays using various methods to extract nucleotides. We have en-
levels of ribonucleotides ( 2 ) .This necessitates the
withsensitivitiesin the picomole rangetoquantitatethe countered interfering activities in these assays, which are
dNTP levels in cultured cells. An enzymatic assay for dNTP’s reported in this paper.
with a sensitivity down to 1 pmol has been developed (3, 4) EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES’
and used widely ( c i Refs. 5-10). In this assay, the level of a
RESULTS
particular dNTP is determined by measuring the incorpora-
tion of radioactively labeled counternucleotide into a defined Properties of the dNTP assay with nucleotidestandards are
DNA template(usuallyanalternatingcopolymer) in the presented under “Supplemental Data” and in Fig. 1 in the
presence of DNA polymerase. Other methods that havebeen miniprint.
developed include high pressure liquid chromatographic sep- d N T P Assays of Standards Added to Extracts-When
dTTP or dATP standards were added to 60% methanol-ex-
* This work was supported by Research Grant CA-24323 from the
National Institutes of Health. The costsof publication of this article ’’ Portions of thispaper(including“ExperimentalProcedures,”
were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article “Supplemental Data,” and Figs. 1 to 7) are presented in miniprint at
musttherefore be herebymarked“aduertisement” in accordance the end of thispaper.Miniprintiseasilyreadwiththeaidofa
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. standard magnifying glass. Full size photocopies are available from
’ The abbreviations used are: dNMP, dNDP, and dNTP,deoxyri- the Journal of Biological Chemistry, 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda,
bonucleoside 5’-mono-, di-, and triphosphates, respectively; HPLC, Md. 20014. Request Document No.0-207, cite authors, and include a
high pressure liquid chromatography. check or money order for $1.35 per set of photocopies.
6640
8. Holler, B., and Cohen, G. H. (1976) J. Virol. 18, 58-64 16. Mathews, C. K. (1966) Biochemistry 5, 2092-2100
9. Mathews, C. K. (1975) Exp. Cell Res. 92, 47-56 17. Duckworth, D. H., and Bessman,M.J. (1967) J . Bcol. Chem. 242,
10. Hellgren, D. Nilsson, S., and Reichard, P. (1979) Biochem. Bio- 2877-2885
phys. Res. Commun.88, 16-22 18. Miller, L. K., and Wells, R. D. (1971) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.
11. Reynolds, E. C., Harris, A. W., and Finch, L. R. (1979) Biochim. A. 68,2298-2302
Biophys. Acta 561, 110-123 19. Saeki, T. S., Hori,M.,andUmezawa,H.(1972) J. Antibiot.
12. Mathews, C. K. (1972) J . Biol. Chem. 247, 7430-7438 (Tokyo)25,343-349
13. Khyrn, J. X., Bynurn, J. W., and Volkin, E. (1977)Anal. Biochem. 20. Cohen, A,, Hirschhorn, R., Horowitz, S. D., Hubinstein, A,, Pol-
77,446-463 mar, s. H., Hong, R., and Martin, D.W., Jr. (1978) Proc. Natl.
14. North, T. W., and Cohen, S. S. (9178) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sei. U. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 75,472-476
S. A. 75,4684-4688 21. Coleman, M. S., Donofrio, J., Hutton, J. J., Hahn. L., Daoud, A,,
15. Murray, R. E., and Mathews, C. K. (1969) J . Mul. Biol. 44, 233- Larnpkin, B., and Dyrninski,J. (1978) J . Biol. Chem. 253, 1619-
248 1626
6644 Enzymatic Assay of dNTPS
50
B
20
'0 10 20 30 40
prnol
\ I
50t \ 1
Enzymatic Assay of dNTP's 6645
125
B
100
75
50
25
] 501
40 ; 5 20
2
:lzl
:_I
l i f ? 3
'
0 60 120 180
s 40
'
0
40
25 50
I..,::
Time (mln)
IO IO
'
0 50 100 '
0 50 100
pi Of Ertrocl