The document outlines the criteria for evaluating journal responses in four levels of outcomes:
1) Strong responses include all required entries that are highly detailed and demonstrate growth. Close reading shows insightful understanding and precise textual support. Comments demonstrate insight and probe deeper understanding.
2) Capable responses include all required detailed entries and show thoughtful understanding with relevant support. Thought-provoking comments consider the reader's experiences.
3) Basic responses include mainly complete entries and show the text was read at a literal level with plot-based details. Comments meet basic requirements with sensible exploration.
4) Weak responses are missing over half entries or are underdeveloped. Ideas are confused with vague or repetitive support. Comments are brief with minimal exploration
The document outlines the criteria for evaluating journal responses in four levels of outcomes:
1) Strong responses include all required entries that are highly detailed and demonstrate growth. Close reading shows insightful understanding and precise textual support. Comments demonstrate insight and probe deeper understanding.
2) Capable responses include all required detailed entries and show thoughtful understanding with relevant support. Thought-provoking comments consider the reader's experiences.
3) Basic responses include mainly complete entries and show the text was read at a literal level with plot-based details. Comments meet basic requirements with sensible exploration.
4) Weak responses are missing over half entries or are underdeveloped. Ideas are confused with vague or repetitive support. Comments are brief with minimal exploration
The document outlines the criteria for evaluating journal responses in four levels of outcomes:
1) Strong responses include all required entries that are highly detailed and demonstrate growth. Close reading shows insightful understanding and precise textual support. Comments demonstrate insight and probe deeper understanding.
2) Capable responses include all required detailed entries and show thoughtful understanding with relevant support. Thought-provoking comments consider the reader's experiences.
3) Basic responses include mainly complete entries and show the text was read at a literal level with plot-based details. Comments meet basic requirements with sensible exploration.
4) Weak responses are missing over half entries or are underdeveloped. Ideas are confused with vague or repetitive support. Comments are brief with minimal exploration
PRESENCE All entries are present, All entries, including All entries are mainly Less than half the entries OF dated, highly detailed (½ initial and second look complete but may tend to are missing, or are REQUIRED page +) and demonstrate entries, are present and be brief, or two or less significantly ENTRIES a commitment to growth demonstrate detailed, entries are missing. underdeveloped. through consistently complete responses. Most diligent, articulate are at substantial (10-12 responses sentence) paragraphs. CLOSE Insightful and carefully Expression of thoughtful Clear evidence that the Ideas are confused, READING OR considered recognition of understanding about text was read & underdeveloped and/or VIEWING OF author’s idea(s); support author’s ideas, including understood at literal level may lack relevance; TEXT from the text is precise a variety of Literary or better; details are support is vague and/or SEEING THE and thoughtfully selected, Elements; support is largely plot based with repetitive. WRITER’S including a variety of relevant and purposeful; a few or no other Literary PURPOSE Literary Elements beyond competent response. Elements considered; plot; a perceptive ideas are appropriate to response. the text; straightforward support; a satisfactory response. IDEAS Comments and/or Thought-provoking Student has met the basic Student’s response is ARISING OUT questions demonstrate comments and/or requirements. Basic, brief. Minimal OF READING insight and maturity and questions about relevant and sensible exploration of OR VIEWING probe toward greater significant issues arising exploration and connections to text. CONNECTING understanding of the from the text show a connection to text AND human condition, human thoughtful consideration evident. THINKING nature, or human spirit; a of the reader’s own BEYOND THE carefully considered experiences; thoughtful TEXT connection to the text. interpretations
PRESENCE All entries are present, All entries, including All entries are mainly Less than half the entries OF dated, highly detailed (½ initial and second look complete but may tend to are missing, or are REQUIRED page +) and demonstrate entries, are present and be brief, or two or less significantly ENTRIES a commitment to growth demonstrate detailed, entries are missing. underdeveloped. through consistently complete responses. Most diligent, articulate are at substantial (10-12 responses sentence) paragraphs. CLOSE Insightful and carefully Expression of thoughtful Clear evidence that the Ideas are confused, READING OR considered recognition of understanding about text was read & underdeveloped and/or VIEWING OF author’s idea(s); support author’s ideas, including understood at literal level may lack relevance; TEXT from the text is precise a variety of Literary or better; details are support is vague and/or SEEING THE and thoughtfully selected, Elements; support is largely plot based with repetitive. WRITER’S including a variety of relevant and purposeful; a few or no other Literary PURPOSE Literary Elements beyond competent response. Elements considered; plot; a perceptive ideas appropriate to the response. text; straightforward support; IDEAS Comments and/or Thought-provoking Student has met the basic Student’s response is ARISING OUT questions demonstrate comments and/or requirements. Basic, brief. Minimal OF READING insight and maturity and questions about relevant and sensible exploration of OR VIEWING probe toward greater significant issues arising exploration and connections to text. CONNECTING understanding of the from the text show a connection to text AND human condition, human thoughtful consideration evident. THINKING nature, or human spirit; a of the reader’s own BEYOND THE carefully considered experiences; thoughtful TEXT connection to the text. interpretations