Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intended Learning Outcomes: At the end of this chapter, the students are expected to:
5.1 Introduction
State is viewed as “the institution that creates warfare and sets economic
policies for a country.” It is also defined as a political unit that has authority over its own
affairs – meaning, its borders are recognized by other countries. Based on the Treaty of
Westphalia of 1648, which established the notion of “nation-state” and “state
sovereignty”, it is assumed that whoever is in-charge of those borders has the right to
determine exactly what is going to happen in their country.
Today, the globalization of politics created an atmosphere where the ideas of the
nation-state, state sovereignty, government control, and state policies are challenged
from all sides. With globalization, some scholars suggest that other entities that cross
national boundaries are becoming more powerful than the state. These entities include
multinational corporations and global civil society organizations (e.g. Red Cross).
In this chapter, we will look at regional alliances and worldwide organizations of
states. This manifests the efforts of countries and governments in the word to
cooperate and collaborate together.
While it is common knowledge that countries must govern their own people, the
need to oversee each states – how each interact with other states and international
organizations – is also important because of globalization. The essence of global
governance is not clear. For some users, it means unified action against specific threats
or merely a framework of rules and norms. Others also see global governance as
nothing more than a contemporary way to refer to international institutions. For the
purposes of discussion, let us define global governance as “a purposeful order that
emerges from institutions, processes, norms, formal agreements, and informal
mechanisms that regulate action for a common good” (Benedict, 2001).
There are factors behind the emergence of global governance:
1. Declining power of nation-states
2. Vast flows of all sorts of things that run into and often right through the borders of
nation-states. Examples:
Flow of digital information through the Internet – it is difficult for a nation-state
to stop such flow and in any case, it is likely that such action would be politically
unpopular and bring much reaction to the nation-state involved in such an
effort. For instance, China’s periodic efforts to interfere with the Internet have
brought great condemnation both internally and externally.
Mass migration of people and their entry, often illegally – if states are unable to
control this flow, then there is a need for some sort of global governance to help
deal with the problem.
Flow of criminal elements and their products (e.g. drugs, laundered money,
etc.) – a strong factor in the call for global governance. There is a need for some
degree of order, some sort of effective authority, and at least some potential for
the improvement of human life.
3. Horrendous events within nation-states that the states themselves either formant
and carry out, or unable to control.
Example: In Sudan, hundreds of thousands have been killed, millions of
people displaces, and the lives of many disrupted in a conflict that date back
to early 2003. The gov’t of Sudan and its military have been implicated in the
conflict between ethnic and tribal groups and the Sudanese government has
been resistant to outside interference in its internal affairs.
USMKCC-COL-F-050
private economy (i.e. innovators, entrepreneurs, activists),
unions and other collective-bargaining groups
cooperatives and collectives
educational institutions,
churches and other faith-based organizations,
hospitals,
fraternities and sororities,
nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and other nonprofits
online groups and social media communities, and
grassroots organizations.
More about the civil society is discussed below.
USMKCC-COL-F-050
• Global movements, such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS, are other examples of national or
identity movements. In this case, they are structured around the fundamentalist
version of Islam.
3. Global Economics
• Global economy demands the states to conform to the rules of free-market
capitalism. Government austerity comes from developments of organizations that
cooperate across countries such as WTO and regional agreements (e.g. NAFTA, EU,
ASEAN).
• Neoliberal economics or neoliberal capitalism that started in the 1980s focuses on
free trade and dismantling trade barriers. No restrictive regulations on
corporations and free flow of capital and jobs are imposed. Neoliberal economics
requires a state to cooperate in the global market through the free flow of capital,
privatization of services, and fiscal austerity or constraint.
• In turn, the government’s role is diminished as it relates to the market. Neoliberal
economics is seen as a threat, in general, because a state cannot protect its own
economic interest as a sovereign state.
• Examples:
Use of IMF and World Bank in forcing government reform in poorer
country.
The regional economic development efforts focused on expanding free
trade and market liberalization. Businesses from developed countries put
their factories and pay people to build factories and produce goods in
developing countries worldwide.
• Economic crises can force government to subscribe to the terms and conditions of
the global financial market and of other nations that can help them regain
economic stability.
USMKCC-COL-F-050
- Increased role in international organizations (e.g. UN, UN International
Criminal Court in Hague), role of non-governmental organizations (e.g.
Doctors Without Borders, Amnesty International), and role of global media.
State is a distinctive political community with its own set of rules and practices
and that is more or less separate from other communities. There are four (4) elements
of a state:
o Some see that nation-states continue to be major players on the global stage –
that is, they retain at least some power in the face of globalization and that they
vary greatly on how they handle the globalization processes.
- Nation-states also have greater roles in addressing problems brought
about by globalization:
o terrorism,
o outsourcing and downsizing pressures,
o economic crisis by economic globalization,
o threats to national identity due to immigration, and
o spread of global diseases such as AIDs and COVID-19.
USMKCC-COL-F-050
5.5 Institutions that Govern International Relations
USMKCC-COL-F-050
5.6 Globalization and Globalism
Citizenship is associated with rights and obligations – e.g. the right to vote and the
obligation to pay taxes. Both rights and obligations link the individual to the state. It has
to do with our attitudes. We need to be willing to engage and to spend time and effort
to the community of which we feel part of.
Global citizenship could be defined as “a moral and ethical disposition that can
guide the understanding of individuals or groups of local and global contexts, and
remind them of their relative responsibilities within various communities” (Van Peski as
cited in Baraldi, 2012). Global citizens are the glue that binds local communities
together in an increasingly globalized world. They might be the new type of people that
can travel within these various boundaries and somehow still make sense of the world.
Global citizenship today may be characterized by the growth of global civil society
movements. People join civil society groups as a way to create an impact to society and
to help solve the problems. Civil society is the part of society that was not the state but
the mercantile/capitalist class which worked for its private interests. It banded together
to protect itself from the power of the state. Examples of well-known civil society
organizations are Red Cross, Greenpeace, and World Wide Fund for Nature.
Moreover, it is observed that civil society groups are coming together because of a
deeper awareness of the world’s problems on a national, regional or global scale. They
do this to respond to problems, whether they are directly affected by them or not.
Furthermore, civil society organizations are important for democracy because through
them, human beings could stand before the power of entities (like the state or the
corporate bodies that control the market) that tend by nature to be oppressive.
USMKCC-COL-F-050