Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Instructor's Name
The five detailed and explained sources logically explore the criminal justice systems
from different points of view. The sources summarize criminal justice, statistics in criminal
justice and criminology, ethics in criminal justice, gender gaps on justice, and remodeling
American sentencing. The five compiled sources are from different people with different ideas
but are all adhering to the criminal law discipline for quality.
Academic source 1: in a detailed 2018 essay, "Essentials of Criminal Justice," Siegel and
Worrall (2018) suggestively reflect the concepts and processes of justice due to dynamic changes
in the field of criminal justice. Legal cases and policies are reflected, which have happened in the
past years. The essentials of criminal justice provide a foundation by describing and analyzing
procedures and agencies of justice. For example, Siegel and Worrall have discussed ethics as
essentials of criminal justice since some individuals have a lot of power allocated. Therefore,
without ethics, it would result in a total mess. However, in my opinion, a lot of power does not
come easily, and most of the time, ethical requirements are bent to grab such power.
Justice," by Walker and Maddan (2019) on both statistical analysis application and theory,
geared towards criminology and criminal justice. The source shows that statistical analysis is
involved in data collection, allowing logical thinking, as variables used in statistics are essential
objects of examination in criminal justice research, such as age. Walker and Maddan (2019)
argue that failure to use adequate sampling, survey, interview, and questionnaire approaches in
opinion, Walker and Maddan discovered that crime and age have a strong relationship. Thus,
3
fairness procedure and results while conducting the investigation have a significance in
Academic source 3: The essay by Souryal and Whitehead (2019), “Ethics in Criminal
Justice," indicates that ethics are essential when deciding on moral judgments. Unethical patterns
in criminal justice influence criminal justice systems affecting legitimacy. From my perspective,
it is evident from the author's essay that ethical principles essential to all disciplines and specific
area perspectives address criminal justice fields such as policing, probation, rectification, and
bail. Several civil representatives’ orders appear in courts of law for on and without ethical
Academic source 4: Justice Systems have been seen to be more lenient based on gender.
According to Bindler and Hjalmarsson (2020), this kind of leniency has been observed,
especially during sentencing, where females get lighter burdens to shoulder. Bindler and
Hjalmarsson (2020) compiled researches on this topic, and a good example given was that of the
US. The US had male defendants receive longer sentences where the comparison converted to
percentage translated to 63% longer sentencing than female defendants. This gap narrows down
to a set of possible reasons. The girlfriend theory is one reason female defendants are deemed as
not responsible for their crimes. Maternal responsibilities are also major reasons why some
women get more lenient sentencing. Other reasons include case differences that are not easy to
Michael Tonry, history and traditions that underlie the justice system are examined as played in
the court of law. It deals with sentences and similar laws that should be revoked by amending
lawful judges to impose other sentence sources in interest. The author suggested that the criminal
4
code is amended and a lower maximum sentence scale for serious crimes. Tonry (2014) stated
that various criminal justice practices and policies are influenced by political, history, and
culture. In my opinion, the United States sentencing was influenced by the political system; thus,
responding to a rise in crime rates by applying tougher laws and constructing more prisons.
Therefore, the justice system is influenced by the political system and impacting sentencing;
Reference
Bindler, A., & Hjalmarsson, R. (2020). The persistence of the criminal justice gender gap:
Evidence from 200 years of judicial decisions. The Journal of Law and Economics, 63(2),
297-339. https://doi.org/10.1086/707482
https://books.google.co.ke/books?id=Ka9EDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover
Souryal, S. S., & Whitehead, J. T. (2019). Ethics in criminal justice: In search of the truth.
Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4377-5590-9.00010-1
Tonry, M. (2014). Remodeling American sentencing: A ten‐step blueprint for moving past mass
9133.12097
Walker, J. T., & Maddan, S. (2019). Statistics in criminology and criminal justice. Jones &
id=cRaIDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover