Professional Documents
Culture Documents
بحث تخرج للطلاب
بحث تخرج للطلاب
824
R. Rehman, S.Ashraf: Analysis of caffeine contents in commercial beverages and tea samples of Pakistan using UV/Visible …
Alzheimer's disease [20]. The symptoms of added for extraction of caffeine using a separatory
Alzheimer’s disorder are lack of learning skills, loss funnel. The extract was analyzed for caffeine
of memory, lack of imagining power and reasoning contents and the average values are reported in Table
skills in acute cases. Oxalates are also present in tea, 2.
kidney stone are formed by oxalates. Oxalates are
Extraction of caffeine from beverages
accumulated in the kidney tissue [21]. Large
amounts of black tea use by men, enhance risk A beverage portion was drawn by a 10 mL pipette
of prostate cancer by 50% [22]. Uv/Vis spectrometry and poured directly in a separatory funnel, then 1 mL
is used for the determination of caffeine in tea, coffee of 20% (w/v) sodium carbonate solution and 5 mL
and beverages [23]. of chloroform were added and shaken for few
minutes. The lower (organic) layer containing
EXPERIMENTAL WORK
caffeine was taken in a sample cell [6].
Chemicals
Preparation of a sample solution of tea
The chemicals used in this study include
The best solvent used for the direct UV-Vis
hydrochloric acid (HCl), chloroform (CHCl3)
spectrophotometric determination of caffeine in tea
obtained from Friend’s laboratory chemical, sodium
and beverages was chloroform, as shown by Maidon
carbonate (Na2CO3) obtained from Riedel-de Haen
[1]. He compared four solvents for caffeine analysis
and caffeine obtained from AppliChem.
including chloroform, methanol, ethyl acetate and
Sample collection water. Among them, chloroform displayed th best
ability to dissolve tea leaves [1]. Initially 0.1 mL of
Different samples of tea and beverages were
the extract of tea, present in the sample cell was
purchased from different markets of Kasur
taken to the test tube and 5 mL of chloroform was
(Pakistan). Different types of energy drinks and soft
added to it. Then the absorbance of the solutions was
drinks including Coca-Cola, Pepsi, diet cola,
measured at 274 nm. Three samples of each brand
mountain dew, Gourmet cola, Boost, Panda, Red
were used for caffeine analysis and the average
bull, Sting, Mask, Pepsi diet, Power house were
values are given in Table 2.
purchased from the local markets in Pakistan.
Preparation of a sample solution of beverages
Instrument
0.1 mL of the extract of beverages, present in the
The UV/vis spectrometer Labomed UVD-3500
sample cell, was dissolved in 5 mL of chloroform to
was used for the analysis of caffeine in different
form the sample solution. Reading was performed at
samples of tea and beverages.
a wavelength of 274 nm. Three samples of each
Calibration solutions preparation brand were used for caffeine analysis and the
Caffeine stock solution of 1000 ppm was average values are given in Table 3.
prepared by dissolving 0.1 g of pure caffeine in 100 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
mL chloroform. It was analyzed by UV/Vis
Calibration line preparation for caffeine analysis
spectrometry for determining λmax and the resulting
spectrum is shown in Fig. 2. Further dilutions were In Fig. 2 the caffeine spectrum is given which
prepared in the range of 1-25 ppm and their indicates that its maximum absorption occurs at 274
absorbances were measured at λmax 274 nm as shown nm. So further photometric analysis of all samples
in Fig. 2. The resulting values are given in Table 1. was carried out at 274 nm.
They were used to draw the calibration line for In Fig. 3 the calibration curve for caffeine was
caffeine analysis as shown in Fig. 3. Cuvettes of drawn by using calibration solutions of caffeine in
plastic were not used because chloroform dissolved the concentration range of 1-25 ppm and absorbance
plastic. was measured on a UV/Vis spectrometer at
wavelength 274 nm, as shown in Table 1.
Extraction of caffeine from tea
All glass apparatus was rinsed with chromic acid
and distilled water before use. 2 g of dried tea
powder was taken in a beaker and 20 mL of distilled
water was added to it and boiled. After boiling, 2 g
of sodium carbonate was added for precipitating
tannins, then filtered. The filtrate was heated and
concentrated to 5 mL. Then 5 mL of chloroform was
825
R. Rehman, S.Ashraf: Analysis of caffeine contents in commercial beverages and tea samples of Pakistan using UV/Visible …
3.262 mg/g. The lowest range was found in the tea
samples of Sapna, Thomata, Malnya 8, Sea Shad 49,
Kanya F1, Kagra, Kateve F1, Malnya F1, Kagway,
Tameta, Manga, Sea shad 55 and Ghatnctr. The
Tetley sample had the highest amount of caffeine
and the Ghatnctr – the lowest one. Al Rasbi
analyzed different tea samples and according to his
result Lipton tea contained 22 mg/g of caffeine but
in this analysis Lipton tea contained 13.672 mg/g of
caffeine [24].
Table 2. Determination of caffeine in different tea
Fig. 2. Caffeine spectrum samples available in Pakistan.
extraction method, multivariate method, reversed XRD patterns of the samples were obtained on a
phase ultraviolet visible high performance liquid TUR M62 powder X-ray diffractometer (XRD)
chromatography method, etc. In this study, UV/Vis using Co-Kα radiation (λ= 1.789 Å) at 40 kV and 20
spectrometric method was used. In table 3 the mA. The morphology of the catalysts was
concentration of caffeine in different beverages is characterized by a JEOL JEM 2100 high resolution
reported as an average of three replicates. transmission electron microscope (TEM) using an
Fourteen different beverages were analyzed. The accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Two basic regimes
level of caffeine in Coca Cola, Pepsi, 7-up, Gourmet of microscope mode were used – bright field
Cola, Mountain Dew, Big Apple, Diet Cola, and transmission microscopy (TEM) and selected area
Pepsi Diet was found to be in the range of 0.101-96.1 electron diffraction (SAED). The pH of the point of
mg/L. The concentration of caffeine in Boost, Power zero charge (pHPZC) of the catalysts was determined
Horse, Panda, Red Bull, Sting, Mask was in the by the pH drift method [17]. The amount of cobalt
range of 130.2-222.3 mg/L. In all of these samples, and iron in the prepared samples as well as the
Boost had the largest amount of caffeine concentrations of leached Co and Fe in the solution
(222.3mg/L), whereas the smallest amount (0.101 were measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy
mg/L) was found in 7-up. Carbonated soft drinks (AAS, Perkin-Elmer).
contain lower amounts of caffeine as compared to Catalytic oxidation of RhB with PMS was carried
energy drinks available in the commercial market. out in a 400 cm3 glass reactor at 293 K with constant
Tauta et al. [6], also worked on carbonated soft stirring at around 400 rpm. In a typical experimental
drinks and energy drinks. Tauta used a UV-Vis procedure, a fixed amount of catalyst was added to a
spectrometric method for the determination of 200 cm3 solution containing 50 mg dm-3 of RhB and
caffeine content in different beverages. The result the suspension was stirred for 30 min to achieve
obtained by this method was that carbonated Coca adsorption-desorption equilibrium. The reaction was
cola had small amount of caffeine and Red Bull had initiated by addition of oxidant to attain the
large amount of caffeine. Kalra also worked on predefined PMS/RhB molar ratio. Aliquots of 4.0
beverages and showed that the highest concentration cm3 withdrawn from the mixture at given time
of caffeine was present in Power-ex (46 µg/mL) and intervals were immediately mixed with 1 mL
the lowest concentration - in XXX (19.5 µg/mL) methanol to quench the reaction. The RhB
[25]. concentration in aqueous solution was determined
Musa Ali also worked on beverages. The result by means of UV/Vis spectrophotometry (Cintra 101,
obtained was that energy drinks contained large GBS) at 554 nm. All tests were conducted in
amount of caffeine as compared to carbonated soft triplicate to ensure reproducibility of experimental
drinks [2]. Results obtained in these analyses were results.
not similar, maybe due to the different place,
CONCLUSIONS
seasonal changes and different laboratory
conditions. UV/Vis spectrophotometry was used for the
MgO supported catalysts with 5 wt. % Co3O4 or determination of caffeine in tea samples and
CoFe2O4 loading were prepared by incipient wetness beverages. Caffeine is the world’s most widely
impregnation [15]. Bulk Co3O4 and CoFe2O4 were consumed psychoactive drug. It is important to
prepared by the precipitation/co-precipitation obtain information about the drinks because they
method.
Table 3. Determination of caffeine in different beverages available in Pakistan.
Caffeine Caffeine Caffeine Caffeine
Sample Concentration Concentration Sample Concentration Concentration
(mg/10mL) (mg/L) (mg/10mL) (mg/L)
Gourmet
7 up 0.001 0.101 0.381 38.1
cola
Panda 0.091 9.1 Diet cola 0.812 81.2
Big Apple 0.102 10.2 Coca cola 0.961 96.1
Mountain Power
0.105 10.5 1.302 130.2
dew horse
Mask 0.17 17 Sting 1.643 164.3
Pepsi 0.199 19.9 Red bull 1.914 191.4
Pepsi diet 0.319 31.9 Boost 2.223 222.3
827
R. Rehman, S.Ashraf: Analysis of caffeine contents in commercial beverages and tea samples of Pakistan using UV-visible …
are widely consumed all over the world. Various 10. D. Mejia, E. Gonzalez, R. Mares, J. Brain, Behave. &
analytical techniques are used for tea analysis like Immune., 23, 721 (2009).
HPLC because these technique has high accuracy 11. D. Graham, Nutr Rev., 36, 97 (1978).
and precision but UV-Vis spectrophotometry is 12. A. Smith, Food Chem. Toxic., 40, 1243 (2002).
13. Wiseman, S.A. Balentine, D. A. Frei, Critical Rev.
mostly used because it is cheap and easily available
Food Sci. Nut., 37, 705 (1997).
in laboratories. Results showed that in case of tea 14. C.O. Ogah, O. Tobebe, J. Innovative Res. Eng. Sci., 3,
samples the largest amount of caffeine was present 404 (2012).
in Tetley and the smallest amount - in Ghatnctr. In 15. I. A. Siddiqui, M.M. Mukhtar, V.M. Saleem, J. Mol.
case of beverages the largest amount of caffeine was Nut. Food Res., 50, 130 (2006).
present in Boost and the smallest amount - in 7-up. 16. M.L. Bunker, M. McWilliams, J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 74,
28 (1979).
REFERENCES
17. M. H. Wong, K. F. Fung and H.P. Carr, Toxicology
1. A. Maidon,A. O. Mansoer, H. Sulistyarti, J. Appl. Sci. lett., 137, 111 (2003).
Res., 8, 2439 (2012). 18. K.F. Fung, M.H. Wong, J. Sci. Food Agr., 84, 1469
2. M.M. Ali, M. Eisa, M.I. Taha, B.A. Zakaria, A. A. (2004).
Elbashir, Pak. J. Nut.,11, 336 (2012). 19. R. Street, O.Drabek, J. Szakova, L. Mladkova, J. Food
3. A. Mumin, K.F. Akhter, Z. Abedin, Z. Hossain, Chem., 104, 1662 (2007).
Malaysian J. Chem., 8, 45 (2006). 20. G. Schwalfenberg, Stephen. J. Genuis, I. Rodushkin,
4. A. Ascherio, S.M. Zhang, M.A. Hernán, I. Kawachi, J. Toxiocology, 2013, 8 (2013).
G.A. Colditz, F.E. Speizer, W.C. Willett, Ann. 21. M. Liebman, S. Murphy, Nutrition Res., 27, 273
Neurol., 50, 56 (2001). (2007).
5. H. N. Wanyika, E. G. Gatebe, L. M. Gitu, E. K. Ngumba 22. K. Shafique, H. Leung, C. Hart, D.S. Morrison, Nutr
and C. W. Maritim, Afri. J. Food Sci., 4, 353 (2010). Cancer, 64, 790 (2012).
6. A. Tautua, W.B. Martin, E.R.E. Diepreye, Adv. J. Food 23. S. Armenta, S. Garrigues, M. de la Guardia, Anal
Sci. Tech., 6,155 (2014). Chim Acta., 547, 197 (2005).
7. T. Atomssa and A.V. Gholap, Afr. J. Pure & Appl. 24. M.M. Al Rasbi, S. A. Khan, Scholars Acad. J. Biosci.,
Chem., 5, 1 (2011). 1, 67 (2013).
8. A.B. Sharangi, Food Res. Int., 42, 529 (2009). 25. K. Kalra, S. Kumar and J. Maithani, Int. J. Res. Dev.
9. D. K. Bempong, P. J. Houghton, K. Steadman, Pharma. Pharm. L. Sci., 2, 1214 (2011).
Bio., 31, 175 (1993).
828