Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESEARCH FINDINGS
The case studies
The unit of analysis has been new technology-based ventures, particularly those that are spin-off
companies arising from universities or other public research providers where there is an ongoing
intellectual property link back to the parent research provider.
Interview data were collected from twelve such companies in Australia and from two in
Scotland.
Hypotheses
Three hypotheses were formulated, the first three to test questions of holism and nonlinearity and
who or where was the entrepreneur:
H(1) Entrepreneurship as the act of new venture creation is a dynamic holistic process and is not
suited to a reductionist research strategy (Bygrave and Hofer, 1991)
H(2) The conceptual process o/venture creation is non-linear and iterative (Bhave, 1994).
H(3): In any study o/new technology small firm (NTSF) creation, the entrepreneur call always be
clearly identified.
Holism, linearity and entrepreneur identity
There is support for the need for a holistic analysis strategy where an entrepreneur could be
identified, but there was a less consistent relationship between the construct of linearity, or more
relevantly non-linearity, and the construct of holism in this context.
CONCLUSIONS
The unit of analysis has been a new incorporated venture spun-off a university or other public
agency research provider.
The implications for commercialization practice were threefold:
1. The extent to which there \vas an identified individual or individuals, who performed as a
classical opportunity driven entrepreneurs, varied:
2. For some ventures (as well described in the entrepreneurship literature) the classical
holistic inability to separate the entrepreneur from his ne\v venture applied.
3. At the other end of this spectrum, there were well planned and well-resourced spin-offs
from CRCs, CSIRO and a large research profile university where the ne\v venture was
nurtured intelnal1y (Degroof and Robeds, 2003).