You are on page 1of 5

WAHANA INOVASI VOLUME 9 No.

1 JAN-JUNI 2020 ISSN : 2089-8592

INFLUENCE OF FAMILY ENVIRONMENT AGAINST STUDENT


ACHIEVEMENT IN CLASS VII SMP NEGERI 1 BARUS
Asmayani1, Alfian Tanjung2
1,2Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Abdul Halim Al-Ishlaiyah Binjai
Alfian.tjg7@gmail.com

ABSTRACT PRELIMINARY

This research is a descriptive Education is essentially a conscious


correlational study, aimed to find out the effort to develop personalities and abilities
influence of the family environment on inside and outside of school and last for a
student achievement in class VII SMP lifetime. Learning achievement is
NEGERI 1 BARUS. The study population evidence of the success of the teaching
was all students of class VII as many as and learning process achieved by
32 people and a total sample of 32 students. While learning achievement is
people. The analysis was performed with determined by various factors that occur
correlation analysis using SPSS 21.0. during the teaching and learning process.
Research data were collected using Learning achievement can be obtained
instruments in the form of a family well if in the learning process, the learner
environment questionnaire and can learn well without any things that
documentation for students' Science interfere with the learner. According to
learning achievement data. The average Slameto (2003: 54), "Other factors that
score of science learning achievement for influence learning achievement can be
Grade VII students of SMP Negeri 1 divided into two, namely internal factors or
Barus is 79.91. This is a high average those originating from within humans and
learning achievement. The average score external factors that originate from outside
of a family environment questionnaire for of human beings".
class VII students of SMP Negeri 1 Barus High and low learning achievement
is 58.47, which is a high average reflects the quality of education. Quality
questionnaire.From the calculation of the education can be achieved by
correlation coefficient, the magnitude of implementing effective and efficient
the influence of the family environment teaching and learning. Learning
with learning achievement class VII SMP achievements can be grouped into
Negeri 1 Barus is r = -0,101 meaning the learning achievements in all fields of
correlation of the two variables above study and learning achievements in
shows a negative relationship. The results certain fields. Learning achievement is the
of testing the hypothesis by t test, final part of the learning process. Many
obtained tcount = -17.931 at the real level students experience learning problems,
α = 0.05 and dk = 30 with ttable = 2.04 consequently learning achievement is
then tcount is smaller than ttable, then in low. The family plays an important role in
this case Ha is rejected and H0 is supporting the success of student
accepted, meaning that there is no the learning. This is in accordance with the
influence of the family environment on opinion of Slameto (2003: 60) "Children
student achievement in class VII SMP 1 will receive influence from the family in
Barus. The magnitude of the influence of the form of: how parents educate children,
the family environment on student relationships between family members,
achievement in class VII of SMP Negeri 1 the atmosphere of the household, and the
Barus is 1.020%, meaning that student economic situation of the family".
achievement affects 1.020% by the family The family environment is very
environment. influential on the learning process of
students, such as learning without good
Keywords: Family Environment, Learning and pleasant conditions will find it difficult
Achievement to focus on the subject matter to be
learned. Although there are some children
147
Asmayani dan Alfian Tanjung : Influence Of Family Environment ……………………………….

who are able to learn with a noisy, Sample


crowded atmosphere and are able to The sample in this study was taken in
learn if accompanied by music. But in total sampling, i.e. all Grade VII students
essence, a person can learn well and of SMP Negeri 1 Baruswith a total of 32
diligently if in an atmosphere of calm, people. In accordance with the opinion of
comfortable, safe, peaceful and good Arikunto (2001) "If the subject is less than
mood so that it does not interfere with the 100, it is better to take all of it so that the
learner's concentration in learning. The research is a research population"
learning atmosphere is strongly
influenced by a good family environment. Research Types and Design
Harmonious parents, good This research is a correlational study
communication between family members, because this study intends to find out the
Based on the writer's observations in influence between two variables, namely
the field, it is seen that there are still many the family environment (X) as the
students who have problems in their independent variable and Science
families, they do not get the attention of learning achievement (Y) as the
parents who are often busy and dependent variable.
separated from parents and conflicts This study aims to look for the
between parents so that it does not have influence of independent variables,
a good effect on children's learning namely the family environment, with the
achievement at school. The importance of dependent variable, namely student
children's education in the family achievement. The approach used in this
environment makes the family have a study is a quantitative approach because
significant influence on the child's the data obtained is related to the
success. The way parents educate, numbers that allow statistical analysis
relationships between family members, techniques to be used.
home atmosphere, family economic The constellation of research
conditions, parent understanding and variables is illustrated in the following
cultural background will also affect diagram:
student achievement.
X Y
RESEARCH METHODS

Place and time of research Information:


This research was conducted in class X : Family environment
VII studentsBarus 1 Middle School in Y : Learning achievement
Barus District for two months from June to
July 2019/2020 Research variable
The variables examined in this study
Population and Research Samples consisted of:
Population 1. The independent variable (X), namely
According to Sutrisno Hadi (1995: the family environment of students'
102) explained: "Population is the entire parents in learning.
population intended to be investigated". 2. Dependent variable (Y), namely
The population is limited as the number of learning outcomes Grade VII students
residents or individuals who have at least of SMP NEGERI 1 BARUS
one common characteristic. From this
opinion, the author can conclude the Definition of Variable Operations
population is a group of individuals or To provide direction in this study the
elements that have in common, the authors provide operational definitions of
characteristics of which are the sources the following research variables:
of data examined and analyzed. The 1. Family environment
population in this study The family environment is an initial
are all VII grade students of SMP Negeri basis of life for every human being.
1 Barus totaling 32 people. The family environment has indicators
consisting of: the way parents
educate, relationships between family
members, the atmosphere of the
148
Asmayani dan Alfian Tanjung : Influence Of Family Environment ……………………………….

home, family economic situation and RESEARCH RESULTS AND


understanding of parents and cultural DISCUSSION
background.
2. Student achievement 1. Test Results
Student learning achievement is the 1.1 Correlation
result obtained by students after The correlation coefficient uses the
making a learning effort in the form of Pearson correlation coefficient (Product-
mastery of knowledge, attitudes and Moment Correlation) formula. In this case
skills towards the subject shown by the correlation coefficient that describes
the daily semester test scores given the level of relationship between the
by the teacher. family environment with student learning
achievement is as follows:

Table 1. Correlation X and Y


Correlations
X Y
Pearson Correlation 1 - 101
X Sig. (2-tailed) , 581
N 32 32
Pearson Correlation - 101 1
Y Sig. (2-tailed) , 581
N 32 32

From the table above the bivariate environment on student science learning
correlation values obtained indicate a achievement.
negative direction, namely r = -0.101. The T test
negative sign of the results of the bivariate The results of testing the hypothesis
correlation shows the opposite direction of using the t test can be seen in table 2 as
the relationship. This means that there is follows:
no relationship between the family

Table 2. Test t with spss paired samples test


Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-
The Std. Std. 95% Confidence tailed)
mean Deviation Error Interval of the
Mean Difference
Lower Upper
Pair -21,438 6,763 1,196 -23,876 -18,999 -17,931 31 , 000
X-Y
1

Based on table 2 obtained tcount = calculated with the coefficient of


-17,931 ttable obtained from ttable with a determination:
significant levelα = 0.05 dk = n-2, it is D = r2 x 100%
obtained table = 2.04. D = -0,1012 x100%
This means that t-count = -17,931 D = 1,020%
<ttable = 2,04 then Ha is rejected and H0
is accepted, meaning that there is no This means that the amount of
significant influence on the family contribution between the family
environment with student achievement in environment and student learning
STATE 1 Barus Middle School achievement is 1,020%.

2. Determination Test 3. Research Results


To find out the amount of influence Based on the results of data analysis,
between variable X and variable Y will be the average score of science learning
achievement is 79.91 This is a high
149
Asmayani dan Alfian Tanjung : Influence Of Family Environment ……………………………….

average learning achievement. The achievement of students of class


average score of a family environment VII SMP NEGERI 1 BARUS
questionnaire was 58.47. If related to
science learning achievement, a The descriptive analysis found that
relationship of -0.101 is obtainedso that the influence of family environment on
the contribution of the family environment learning achievement was not significant.
to science learning achievement becomes It is proven that r = -0,101 and t = =-
(-0,101) 2 x 100% =1,020%. 17,931 < table = 2.04.
From the results of the calculations By looking at the magnitude of the
above it turns out that the correlation correlation coefficient r and the
coefficient between the family significance test t, it is said that the family
environment and student achievement is environment does not have a significant
obtained -10,101 it can be seen that relationship to student learning
between the family environment towards achievement.
the learning achievement of students of The magnitude of the relationship
class VII in Barus Negri 1 Barus Junior between the family environment on
High School in 2019/2020 Academic Year student achievement in the form of
shows a negative direction. This means percentages is 1.020% means that the
that there is no relationship between success of students in achieving their
motivation and student learning outcomes learning achievements 1.020% is very low
in science. relationship with the family environment.
The results of the analysis or This is acceptable because if a student
calculation of tcount in the t test, tcount =- who has a good family environment
17,931 at the real levelα = 0.05 dk = 30 at certainly hopes that the child's parents will
the price table = 2.04. So the pricetitung = be better at achieving learning
smaller than the pricettable, then in this achievement.
caseHa was rejected and H0 was
accepted, so it was concluded that there CONCLUSIONS AND
was no significant influence between the RECOMMENDATIONS
family environment on the learning
achievement of students of class VII in 1. Conclusions
STATE 1 SMP SMP BARUS in Barus Based on the results and discussion
Subdistrict in 2019/2020 Academic Year. of the research described in the previous
Based on the results of data analysis the chapter, it can be concluded as follows:
relationship between variable X and Y is 1. There was no influence of the
1.020%. Based on the qualification family environment on the
correlation coefficient is -0.101, the learning achievement of students
relationship between the two variables is of class VII of Barus 1 Junior High
negative, which means there is no School in Barus Sub-district in
relationship between the two variables. 2019/2020 Academic Year with a
negative correlation of -0.101.
4. Research Discussion 2. The contribution of the family
After analyzing and processing data environment to the achievement
between variable X and variable Y, the of learning Science is 1,020%.
results of the study show that: This means that the contribution
1. From the family environment of the family environment is very
questionnaire distributed there low on learning achievement.
was an average of 58.47.
2. The average learning 2. Suggestions
achievement of Science is 79.91. Based on Conclusions that have been
3. Judging from the correlation put forward, then as a follow up to this
coefficient = -0.101. research some things are suggested as
4. Based on the results of data follows:
analysis the magnitude of the 1. The teacher should encourage
relationship of variable X with students to be more diligent in
variable Y = 1.020%. learning even though the family
5. There is no influence of the family environment is not so good.
environment on the learning
150
Asmayani dan Alfian Tanjung : Influence Of Family Environment ……………………………….

2. In an effort to improve good Slameto 2003. Learning and Factors That


learning achievement, teachers, Influence It. Rineka Cempaka:
parents and students themselves Salatiga.
must support each other in
learning. Suherman, Erman. 2003. Contemporary
3. To the next researcher for the Mathematical Learning Strategies.
development of this research so Bandung: Department of
that this research is useful as Mathematics Education FPMIPA
information on education. UPI.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Sujana, Arman. 2007. Complete Biology


Dictionary. Mega Literacy: Jakarta.
Akbar, Reni, et al. 2001. Creativity.
Jakarta: PT. GRASINDO (Gramedia Sukidin, Basrowi, and Suranto. 2002.
Widiasarana Indonesia). Classroom Action Research
Management. Surabaya: Insan
Arikunto, S. 2002. Fundamentals of Scholar.
Educational Evaluation (Revised
Edition). Jakarta: Earth Literacy. Supriadi, Dedi. 1997. Creativity, Culture,
and Development of Science and
Arikunto, S. 2002. Research Procedures. Technology. Bandung: CV
Rineka Cipta: Jakarta. ALFABETA.

Asikin, Mohamad. 2001. Learning Models. Wijayanti, Pradnyo. 2002. Cooperative


Semarang: Semarang State Learning Type STAD (Paper).
University. Surabaya: Surabaya State
University
Dimyati and Mudjiono. 2006. Learning
and Learning. Rineka Cipta:
Jakarta.

Hamalik, Oemar. 2004. Teaching and


Learning Process. Bumi Aksara:
Jakarta.

Mahmud, Darsono. 1989. Educational


Psychology. Jakarta: Ministry of
Education and Culture (Dirjen Dikti
PPLPTK).

Nana, Sudjana. 1989. CBSA and


Teaching and Learning Process.
Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Poerwodaminto, WJS 1999. Indonesian


General Dictionary. Jakarta: Balai
Pustaka.

Syaiful, Bahri, Djamarah. 2002. Learning


Psychology. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.

Semiawan, Conny, et al. 1992. Process


Skills Approach. How to Activate
Students in Learning? Jakarta:
Grasindo.

You might also like