Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The is that
submission
of seven
all alleged ottences are punishable with
mprisonment vears, theretore the police authorities are bound to
follow the procedure laid down under Sec tion 41-A P L e pettes
could not has
have been wrougly implicatedof und be amested Relance
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State
peen placed on the judgement Apex Court in
of Bihar. (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Social Action Forum for Manav
Adhikar Ys. Union of India, Ministry
2015
of Law and Justice and others in
Writ Petifion (Civil) No. 73 of with Criminal Appeal No. 1265 of
2017, Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 156 of 2017, Satendra Kumar Antil
of and 10 51
S.Central Bureau lvestigation Another, (2022) SCC
and co-ordinate DivISIOm Bench of this Court in Vimal Kumar & 3 others
Vs. State of U.P. & 3 others in 2021 (2) ACR 1147.
We have gone through the impugned first information report and we are of
the opinion that the guidelines framed by the Apex Court in the above
noted judgement are equally applicable to the facts of the instant case
31..2023
Order Date i
Nitenar
AUTHENTISATED COPY
he5
SECTON
cONPUTERI COFFICER
ED COpYING
HIGH CU JRT, SECTION
ALLIAHABAD
02 FEB737
CHANDAN BHAGAT
Advocate-High
126-A, New
Court
Chamber No. Building
High Ourt, Allahabad
Mob. No. 9795639438,
7007034516
Group:
DISTRICT: Meguf
vikas . . ..Petitioner
Versus
CANCELLED
CANCELLED
Inda PDt
Tools
*Consignment Number
RU24063721 5IN Track More
Tariff: 22.00