Professional Documents
Culture Documents
notice to the petitioner namely Shweta Kumari in which it was observed that a
direction was given to cancel the appointment and therefore 2/4 days was
A copy of the Letter No. 6, Dated 25.07.2022 issued under the Signature of
Interlocutory Application.
That it is to state and submit that on 17.08.2022, the petitioner has given a
detailed reply with regard to the appointment and also submitted that her
appointment is much before 2014. The petitioner also submitted that the
petitioner has been working for last so many years and has completed DL.Ed. It
is further submitted that without giving show cause notice and following the
A copy of the reply given by the petitioner dated 17.08.2022 to the Member
Condition) Rules, 2020 Clause 18 (i) (b) (iv) and as per the Rule 13 the
A copy of the Memo No. 10, dated 12.09.2022 issued under the Signature of the
That it is to state and submit that the order passed of removal of the petitioner
discussion with regard to the reasons given by the present petitioner. The
reasons given by the petitioner in show cause is not been considered. In fact the
show cause notice itself will manifest the pre-determined mind, the process has
been adopted in terms of the letter issued by the District Programme Officer.
Thus the entire action is in teeth of the judgement passed by the Hon'ble Apex
Court.
That it is to state and submit that the service condition of Bihar Panchayat
disciplinary authority and the same has to be done by providing the Memo of
Charge and accordingly a major or minor punishment can be given. The entire
disciplinary action has to be based on allegation with the duty, not following the
laid down code of conduct working against the interest of the students/ interest
of the school. Thus the disciplinary action can be taken. Thus under this
Rules 2020, in fact the entire action which has been taken by the authority
concerned does not gives power to the appointing authority as the action has to
conduct not being followed or the teacher acting against the interest of the
students/ school. In the present case none of the issues are attracted. At the same
time, any such procedure must follow the guidelines as given under Rule 18 (ii)
in the present case none of the procedure is also falling. Thus the entire
Thus under this background this Court may graciously be pleased to set aside
the order of cancellation of the order of the termination of the petitioner dated
12.09.2022 being Memo no. 10 issued under the Signature of the Member