The document discusses providing performance appraisal feedback and using a scale to rate agreement with statements about feedback. It includes 8 statements to rate from 1-4 on whether the respondent strongly agrees, somewhat agrees, somewhat disagrees, or strongly disagrees. The statements cover topics like the goals of feedback, categorizing workers, using feedback to assess worker worth and value, and sending messages through performance reviews. The respondent's total score on the ratings was 26.
The document discusses providing performance appraisal feedback and using a scale to rate agreement with statements about feedback. It includes 8 statements to rate from 1-4 on whether the respondent strongly agrees, somewhat agrees, somewhat disagrees, or strongly disagrees. The statements cover topics like the goals of feedback, categorizing workers, using feedback to assess worker worth and value, and sending messages through performance reviews. The respondent's total score on the ratings was 26.
The document discusses providing performance appraisal feedback and using a scale to rate agreement with statements about feedback. It includes 8 statements to rate from 1-4 on whether the respondent strongly agrees, somewhat agrees, somewhat disagrees, or strongly disagrees. The statements cover topics like the goals of feedback, categorizing workers, using feedback to assess worker worth and value, and sending messages through performance reviews. The respondent's total score on the ratings was 26.
We will try to assess your inclination in giving feedbacks.
Your goal in this task is to become person
focus which is the primary role of performance appraisal feedback. Use this scale to respond to the following items: Rate 1 if you strongly agree 2 if you somewhat agree 3 if you somewhat disagree 4 if you strongly disagree
Criteria Rating 1. The goal of feedback is to improve performance. 4 2. Categorizing workers (e.g. "self-starter", "late bloomer", "problem child:, 2 etc.) is a feedback. 3. Performance evaluation and feedback is a chance to let workers know 4 where they stand with you. 4. The goal of feedback is to give each worker an overall assessment of his 4 value to the organization. 5. It is helpful to sum up the worth of a person before providing feedback. It 3 provides a context and helps frame the feedback. 6. Overall, I know who the better and worse workers are. I make my 3 dimensional evaluations and feedback according to my overall assessments. 7. An angry response to negative performance feedback is to be expected since we are essentially talking about an assessment of worth. People can get 2 ego involved and defensive over such assessments. 8. Performance feedback is sometimes a chance to send a message to someone. His performance may be good but he just is not onboard where I 4 am trying to get things to go. A critical review can get his attention and get him with the programs Total Score 26
MACT 1043 – Performance Management System | 1
WARNING: No part of this E-module or LMS content can be reproduced or transported or shared to others without permission from the University of Saint Louis. Unauthorized use of the materials, other than personal learning use, will be penalized. Please be guided accordingly.