1.

Yes, they should be held responsible for moral wrong doings made by people lower on the
supply chain. This is because Apple has the freedom to choose and choose the vendors from
whom they purchase their goods, giving them influence over the ethics of the supply.
2. Apple should keep working with its suppliers to adopt new procedures. This is because it would
take too long and be inefficient for Apple to source all of its products directly.
3. Yes, consumers should be expected to take the reputation of the business's ethics into account
while making purchases. This is because it is the social duty of consumers to support companies
that maintain moral standards in their operations. Consumers can affect a company's ethical
behaviour because all businesses depend on customers to buy their products.
4. I believe that the clothing industry also depends on ethical business conduct. In Asian nations,
there are some widely recognized apparel labels, some of which are reportedly produced using
unethical practices. Because they can only consider the quality and the brand itself, many
buyers are unaffected by choosing the clothes brand of their choice. Even if they didn't know
what the clothes were made of, they kept shopping or purchased a lot of clothing from a
particular brand.
5. I believe it depends on the type of product I'm buying. Sincerely, as a consumer, I don't consider
the materials that the things are made of. If a product was so popular that many people were
consuming it, you would never consider its manufacturing process. Many of us concentrated on
the brand name and the quality of the item.
6. The best course of action, in my opinion, would be for a third party regulatory authority to offer
the company ideas or solutions that could assist it resolve or stop its unethical practices. You
need some connections and power to make it function; you can't just give it out or modify its
procedures by yourself. The best advice I could give was to make a statement or offer
suggestions for the company's improvement.