Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Workplace Safety Answer Manual Q A J J Keller Associates 2014 PDF
Workplace Safety Answer Manual Q A J J Keller Associates 2014 PDF
Copyright 2014
ISBN: 978-1-61099-147-6
All rights reserved. Neither the publication nor any part thereof
may be reproduced in any manner without written permission of
the Publisher. United States laws and Federal regulations pub-
lished as promulgated are in public domain. However, their
compilation and arrangement along with other materials in this
publication are subject to the copyright notice.
ii
9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
EDITORIAL
vice president – editorial resources WEBB A. SHAW
director – editorial resources PAUL V. ARNOLD
project editor JENNIFER J. STROSCHEIN
sr. editorial manager – workplace safety PETER M. MCLAUGHLIN
sr. editor – workplace safety J. TRAVIS RHODEN
editor – workplace safety ROBERT A. ERNST
editor – workplace safety TRICIA S. HODKIEWICZ
editor – workplace safety JUDIE SMITHERS
editor – workplace safety MARK H. STROMME
associate editor LISA M. NEUBERGER
sr. metator/xml analyst MARY K. FLANAGAN
sr. layout editor MICHAEL P. HENCKEL
The Editorial Staff is available to provide information generally associated with this publication to a
normal and reasonable extent, and at the option of, and as a courtesy of, the Publisher.
iii
9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
iv
9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Introduction
How to Use This Manual
Still Have a Question?
A Word of Caution
FAQS
Introduction
A
AEDs
Aerial Lifts
Aisles and Walkways
B
Bloodborne Pathogens
C
Compressed Gases
Confined Spaces
D
E
Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution
Emergency Action Plans
Emergency Eyewashes and Showers
Ergonomics
Exit Routes
Extension Cords
Eye and Face Protection
v
9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
F/G
Fall Protection
Fire Prevention Plans
First Aid
First Aid Kits
Fixed Ladders
Flammable Liquids
H
Hazard Communication
I/J/K
Injury and Illness Recordkeeping
Inspections
L
Lockout/Tagout
M/N
Machine Guarding
O
P/Q
Portable Fire Extinguishers
Portable Ladders
Powered Industrial Trucks
R
Recordkeeping
Respiratory Protection
S
Scissor Lifts
Spray Booths
Stairs
Storage Racks
vi
9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
T/U/V
Training
W/X/Y/Z
Reference
OSHA Letters of Interpretation
Glossaries
Agency Contacts
Index
vii
3/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
viii
3/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Introduction
More than 90 million Americans spend their day on the job. For years, no uniform and
comprehensive provision existed for their protection against safety and heatlh hazards.
Finally, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) of 1970 was passed “...to assure
so far as possible every working man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful working
conditions and to preserve our human resources.”
Under the Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) was created
within the Department of Labor to:
• Encourage employers and employees to reduce workplace hazards and to imple-
ment new or improve existing safety and health programs;
• Provide for research in occupational safety and health to develop innovative ways
of dealing with occupational safety and health problems;
• Establish separate but dependent responsibilities and rights for employers and
employees for the achievement of better safety and health conditions;
• Maintain a reporting and recordkeeping system to monitor job-related injuries and
illnesses;
• Establish training programs to increase the number and competence of occupa-
tional safety and health personnel;
• Develop mandatory job safety and health standards and enforce them effectively;
and
• Provide for the development, analysis, evaluation, and approval of state occupa-
tional safety and health programs.
Since OSHA’s creation, the agency’s mission has been to save lives, prevent injuries, and
protect the health of America’s workers. To accomplish this, OSHA establishes and enforces
protective standards. Under these standards, employers must provide employees with jobs
and a place of employment free from recognized hazards that are causing, or are likely to
cause, death or serious physical harm.
In light of the many detailed and often complex regulatory requirements with which an
employer must comply, it is not surprising that questions arise and can lead to instances of
non-compliance. Unfortunately, non-compliance may mean employees are at risk. For this
reason, OSHA is authorized under the OSH Act to conduct inspections and take enforce-
ment actions.
OSHA considers inspection one of its primary tools for determining whether or not an
employer is in compliance with laws and regulations. As such, the agency inspects nearly
40,000 workplaces in the United States each year. This often results in citations and fines
of thousands of dollars against employers.
Introduction–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
While avoiding an OSHA inspection may not be possible, employers can avoid OSHA
citations. The best way to do this, in part, is ensuring that applicable regulatory requirements
are clearly understood. This is essential if employers are to effectively implement those
requirements.
The regulations governing general industry employers are often very detailed and complex.
The purpose of this manual, therefore, is to provide detail and insight into those require-
ments and offer assistance for mastering compliance.
FAQs
The frequently asked questions (FAQs) format of this manual highlights specific questions
most often asked about OSHA general industry standards. The FAQs are divided into topics
that cover a variety of workplace safety issues, including powered industrial trucks, emer-
gency eyewashes and showers, exit routes, etc. This is intended to allow the user to quickly
locate information that may be relevant to their operations. These FAQs are not to be
considered complete and do not relieve employers from complying with all applicable fed-
eral, state, and local regulations.
Reference
Guidance such as Letters of Interpretation, OSHA contact information, a glossary, and an
index are provided for reference purposes. While this information does not mandate require-
ments, it nonetheless provides vital information should additional guidance be necessary.
This will help ensure continued compliance with regulatory requirements.
While numerous compliance questions have been addressed in this manual, it is not pos-
sible to answer all questions an employer may have. However, because compliance is
paramount, employers are encouraged to contact the workplace safety experts at J. J.
Keller & Associates, Inc. for additional assistance. This may be done by logging in with a
username and password at the following website:
www.jjkellerpublications.com
Employers may ask any OSHA-related compliance question via the “Personal Assistant”
feature and receive an answer via email within one business day.
2–Introduction
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
A Word of Caution
While many requirements are provided in substantial detail, this manual is not intended to
take the place of the regulations found in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 29 CFR
1910, “Occupational Safety and Health Standards.” Due to the constantly changing nature
of these regulations, it is impossible to guarantee absolute accuracy of the material con-
tained herein. The Publisher and Editors, therefore, cannot assume any responsibility for
omissions, errors, misprinting, or ambiguity contained within this publication and shall not be
held liable in any degree for any loss or injury caused by such omission, error, misprinting,
or ambiguity presented in this publication.
This publication is designed to provide reasonably accurate and authoritative information in
regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the Publisher is
not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. If legal advice or
other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should
be sought.
Introduction–3
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
4–Introduction
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Introduction
Are you totally in compliance with all regulations? Or have you implemented no safety or
health program whatsoever? Most companies fall somewhere between these two points.
Many companies are not even sure where they fall, as far as compliance is concerned.
Ensuring ongoing compliance is paramount to the safety and health of a workplace. How-
ever, there are hundreds of OSHA standards, directives, and guidance documents, etc.,
which employers must know and understand. As a result, implementation of required safety
requirements can be a time-consuming and confusing process.
Questions about specifics requirements often arise, and employers continually seek clari-
fication and additional guidance. The questions set forth in this manual are those most
frequently asked by employers. The answers to many of these questions are provided.
They are based on OSHA regulations, industry consensus standards, OSHA directives,
Letters of Interpretation, etc. This information is intended to enhance understanding of
OSHA regulations and compliance. These frequently asked questions are not to be con-
sidered complete and do not relieve employers from complying with all applicable federal,
state, and local regulations.
FAQS–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–FAQS
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
A
Table of Contents
AEDs ................................................................................................... 1
Training........................................................................................... 1
Quantity .......................................................................................... 1
Aerial Lifts............................................................................................ 1
Definitions ....................................................................................... 1
Fall Protection .................................................................................. 1
Training........................................................................................... 2
Aisles and Walkways ............................................................................. 1
Markings and Labeling ....................................................................... 1
Spacing .......................................................................................... 1
3/13 A–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–A 3/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
AEDs
Training
Quantity
AEDs –1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–AEDs
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Aerial Lifts
Definitions
Fall Protection
Training
Spacing
The width of the largest equipment includes the width of the widest carried if the load
is wider than the frame of the equipment. For example, forklifts might carry 12 foot long
lumber horizontally on the forks, so the aisle width must be 15 feet.
Employers must also comply with any applicable local or state building and fire codes.
B–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–B
Bloodborne Pathogens
Coverage
Are employees who are designated to render first aid covered by the standard?
Yes. If employees are trained and designated as responsible for rendering first aid as
part of their job duties, they are covered by the protections of the standard. However,
OSHA will consider it a de minimis violation — a technical violation carrying no pen-
alties — if employees, who administer first aid as a collateral duty to their routine work
assignments, are not offered the pre-exposure hepatitis B vaccination, provided that a
number of conditions are met. In these circumstances, no citations will be issued.
This, however, does not apply to personnel who provide first aid at a first-aid station,
clinic, or dispensary, or to the healthcare, emergency response or public safety per-
sonnel expected to render first aid in the course of their work. The de minimis
Bloodborne Pathogens–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
classification is limited to persons who render first aid only as a collateral duty, respond-
ing solely to injuries resulting from workplace incidents, generally at the location where
the incident occurred. To merit the de minimis classification, the following conditions
also must be met:
• Reporting procedures must be in place under the exposure control plan to
ensure that all first-aid incidents involving the presence of blood or OPIM are
reported to the employer before the end of the work shift during which the
incident occurs.
• Reports of first-aid incidents must include the names of all first-aid providers
who rendered assistance and a description of the circumstances of the acci-
dent, including date and time, as well as a determination of whether an
exposure incident, as defined in the standard, has occurred.
• A report that lists all such first-aid incidents must be readily available to all
employees and provided to OSHA upon request.
• First-aid providers must receive training under the Bloodborne Pathogens
standard that covers the specifics of the reporting procedures. All first-aid
providers who render assistance in any situation involving the presence of
blood or other potentially infectious materials, regardless of whether or not a
specific exposure occurs, must have the vaccine made available to them as
soon as possible but in no event later than 24 hours after the exposure
incident. If an exposure incident as defined in the standard has taken place,
other post-exposure follow-up procedures must be initiated immediately, as
per the requirements of the standard.
2–Bloodborne Pathogens
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
In the exposure control plan, are employers required to list specific tasks that place
the employee at risk for all job classifications?
No. If all the employees within a specific job classification perform duties where occu-
pational exposure occurs, then a list of specific tasks and procedures is not required for
that job classification. However, the job classification (e.g., “nurse”) must be listed in the
plan’s exposure determination, and all employees within the job classification must be
included under the requirements of the standard.
Bloodborne Pathogens–3
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Can tasks and procedures be grouped for certain job classifications in the plan?
Yes. Tasks and procedures that are closely related may be grouped. In other words,
they must share a common activity, such as “vascular access procedure” or “handling
of contaminated sharps.”
Exposure Incidents
4–Bloodborne Pathogens
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
• The protective equipment or clothing used at the time of the exposure inci-
dent;
• Location of the incident and procedures being performed when the incident
occurred;
• Employee’s training; and
• The source individual (unless the employer can establish that identification is
infeasible or prohibited by state or local law).
The employer should then evaluate the policies and “failures of controls” at the time of
the exposure incident to determine actions that could prevent future incidents.
What information must the employer provide to the healthcare professional following
an exposure incident?
The healthcare professional must be provided with a copy of the standard as well as the
following information:
• A description of the employee’s duties as they relate to the exposure incident;
• Documentation of the route(s) and circumstances of the exposure;
• The results of the source individual’s blood testing, if available; and
• All medical records relevant to the appropriate treatment of the employee,
including vaccination status, which are the employer’s responsibility to main-
tain.
Bloodborne Pathogens–5
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
serological testing, the blood sample must be preserved for 90 days. If, within 90 days
of the exposure incident, the employee elects to have the baseline sample tested for
HIV, testing must be done as soon as feasible.
What information does the healthcare professional provide to the employer following
an exposure incident?
The employer must obtain and provide to the employee a copy of the evaluating
healthcare professional’s written opinion within 15 days of completion of the evaluation.
The healthcare professional’s written opinion for hepatitis B is limited to whether hepa-
titis B vaccination is indicated and if the employee received the vaccination. The written
opinion for post-exposure evaluation must include information that the employee has
been informed of the results of the evaluation and told about any medical conditions
resulting from exposure that may require further evaluation and treatment. All other
findings or diagnoses must be kept confidential and not included in the written report.
Hepatitis B Vaccination
6–Bloodborne Pathogens
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
this schedule to be met. Only persons who render first aid only as a collateral duty,
responding solely to injuries resulting from workplace incidents, generally at the loca-
tion where the incident occurred would not have to be offered the pre-exposure
hepatitis B vaccination (OSHA would consider this a de minimus violation — a technical
violation carrying no penalties).
Bloodborne Pathogens–7
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Laundry
Are employees allowed to take their protective equipment home and launder it?
Employees are not permitted to take their protective equipment home and launder it. It
is the responsibility of the employer to provide, launder, clean, repair, replace, and
dispose of personal protective equipment.
Do employers have to buy a washer and dryer to clean employees’ personal protec-
tive equipment?
There is no OSHA requirement stipulating that employers must purchase a washer and
dryer to launder protective clothing. It is an option that employers may consider.
Another option is to contract out the laundering of protective clothing. Employers may
also choose to use disposable personal protective clothing and equipment.
8–Bloodborne Pathogens
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
What water temperature and detergent types are acceptable when laundering per-
sonal protective equipment?
The decontamination and laundering of protective clothing are governed by the laundry
provisions of 1910.1030(d)(4)(iv). Washing and drying the garments should be done
according to the clothing manufacturer’s instructions.
Bloodborne Pathogens–9
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
What type of personal protective equipment (PPE) must be worn to reduce or elimi-
nate exposure to bloodborne pathogens?
The standard requires that PPE be “appropriate.” PPE will be considered “appropriate”
only if it does not permit blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) to pass
through to, or reach, the skin, employees’ underlying garments, eyes, mouth, or other
mucous membranes under normal conditions of use and for the duration of time that
the PPE will be used. This allows the employer to select PPE based on the type of
exposure and the quantity of blood or OPIM which can be reasonably anticipated to be
encountered during performance of a task or procedure.
Does protective clothing need to be removed before leaving the work area?
Yes. OSHA requires that personal protective equipment be removed before leaving the
work area. While “work area” must be determined on a case-by-case basis, a work area
is generally considered to be an area where work involving occupational exposure
occurs or where the contamination of surfaces may occur.
10–Bloodborne Pathogens
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
What type of eye protection is required when working with blood or other potentially
infectious materials (OPIM)?
The use of eye protection would be based on the reasonable anticipation of facial
exposure. Masks in combination with eye protection devices, such as glasses with solid
side shields, goggles, or chin-length face shields, shall be worn whenever splashes,
spray, spatter, or droplets of blood or OPIM may be generated and eye, nose, or mouth
contamination can be reasonably anticipated.
Recordkeeping
Bloodborne Pathogens–11
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Regulated Waste
12–Bloodborne Pathogens
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
determines that sufficient evidence of regulated waste exists, either through observa-
tion (e.g., a pool of liquid in the bottom of a container, dried blood flaking off during
handling), or based on employee interviews, citations may be issued if the employer
does not comply with the provisions of the standard on regulated waste.
Sanitation
Bloodborne Pathogens–13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
and procedures being performed). The employer’s written schedule for cleaning and
decontamination should identify such specifics on a task-by-task basis.
What alternatives are acceptable if soap and running water are not available for
handwashing?
Antiseptic hand cleansers in conjunction with clean cloth/paper towels or antiseptic
towelettes are examples of acceptable alternatives to running water. However, when
these types of alternatives are used, employees must wash their hands with soap and
running water as soon as feasible. These alternatives are only acceptable at worksites
where it is infeasible to provide soap and running water.
Sharps
Sharps Containers
14–Bloodborne Pathogens
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Bloodborne Pathogens–15
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
more of the recording criteria in 1904.7. If an employer is exempted from the OSHA
recordkeeping rule, the employer does not have to maintain a sharps log.
Spill Kit
Training
What are the qualifications that a person must possess in order to conduct
bloodborne pathogen training?
The person conducting the training is required to be knowledgeable in the subject
matter covered by the elements in the training program and be familiar with how the
course topics apply to the workplace that the training will address. The trainer must
demonstrate expertise in the area of occupational hazards of bloodborne pathogens.
Examples of individuals who could conduct training include health care professionals
such as control practitioners, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses. Non-
healthcare professionals who could conduct training include industrial hygienists,
epidemiologists, or professional trainers provided that they can demonstrate evidence
of specialized training in the area of bloodborne pathogens.
16–Bloodborne Pathogens
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Universal Precautions
Bloodborne Pathogens–17
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
18–Bloodborne Pathogens
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
C
Table of Contents
9/14 C–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–C 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Compressed Gases
Definitions
Inspection
CGA Pamphlet C-6 provides detailed instructions, and Appendix A provides a sample
inspection report form. In general, all part of a cylinder (e.g., valves, neck rings, hoses,
manifold, regulator, etc.) should be inspected, at a minimum, for:
• Corrosion or pitting;
• Cracks;
• Denting;
• Bulging;
• Gouges;
• Leaks;
• Arbitrary paint; and
• Oil, grease, and other foreign material.
Leaking regulators, cylinder valves, or other equipment must be taken out of service.
Propane
How far away from a building must an outside propane tank be located?
OSHA says that outside storage of up to 500 lbs. requires no separation from buildings.
Quantities of 501 to 2,500 lbs. requires no separation from buildings except for those
on an adjoining property, next to any sidewalk, or near busy thoroughfares. In these
instances, separation must be at least 10 feet. Quantities over 2,501 lbs. must be
separated as follows:
• 2,501 to 6,000 lbs. – 10 feet.
• 6,001 to 10,000 lbs. – 20 feet.
• Over 10,000 lbs. – 25 feet.
Also, at 1910.110(f)(2)(i) OSHA states “Containers in storage shall be located so as to
minimize exposure to excessive temperature rise, physical damage, or tampering by
unauthorized persons.”
Local or state fire code may also address this issue; therefore, local authorities should
be consulted.
Storage
Use
provides for stable support of cylinders during movement. The “special truck” must be
designed so that the following conditions are met:
• Cylinders must be held in an erect or nearly erect position, and
• Protection of the cylinder valves and regulators must be provided.
Compressed gas cylinders which are not secured to a “special truck” must have their
regulators removed and valve-protection caps installed.
Also, CGA Pamphlet P-1, which has been adopted by reference, states (Section 3.5,
“Safe Handling of Cylinders”) that “A suitable hand truck, forklift truck, or similar mate-
rial handling device should be used with the container properly secured to the device.”
Both OSHA and CGA discuss securing cylinders during transport, but neither specifi-
cally requires a chain. A chain would be effective at securing cylinders, as would any
comparable method that would secure the cylinder to the truck.
What safety measures must be used when using compressed gas cylinders?
When using any compressed gas (i.e., cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor
vehicle cargo tanks), employers must comply with the provisions outlined in CGA
Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference in the OSHA standard.
In specific regard to the use of compressed gas cylinders:
• Cylinder valves must be closed when work is finished.
• Cylinder valves must be closed before moving cylinders.
• Cylinders must never be used as rollers or supports, whether full or empty.
• Don’t place cylinders where they become part of an electric circuit or use them
as a ground during welding.
• Don’t subject cylinders to temperature extremes.
• Unless connected to a manifold, oxygen from a cylinder must not be used
without first attaching an oxygen regulator to the cylinder valve.
• Before connecting a regulator to the cylinder valve, the valve must be opened
slightly for an instant and then closed.
• Avoid dragging or sliding cylinders.
• Don’t lift cylinders by the caps.
• Move cylinders with a suitable hand truck, lift truck, or crane with a cradle or
platform.
• Never drop cylinders or strike them against one another or other surfaces.
Confined Spaces
Air Monitoring
Is air monitoring required if the space does not contain hazardous chemicals?
The standard says that “when testing for atmospheric hazards, test first for oxygen,
then for combustible gases and vapors, and then for toxic gases and vapors.” However,
OSHA guidance has said “the type of testing that needs to be performed...is dependant
on the hazards that are present within the space; employers are not required to test
substances which will not potentially be present.” And the standard itself says “Test or
monitor the permit space as necessary to determine if acceptable entry conditions are
being maintained during...entry operations.” [bold emphasis added] If the employer is
certain there is no atmospheric hazard, testing is not required.
Alternate Entry
Entry
Identification
If the opening to the space is too small for someone to enter do we need a permit to
look inside or reach into the space?
In this situation, OSHA’s guidance has said the standard does not apply. The space
does not meet the definition of confined space because the person can’t “bodily enter.”
However, the space can still have atmospheric, electrical, or other hazards that need
to be addressed.
Reclassification
Recordkeeping
If an evaluation concludes a company does not have any confined spaces, is docu-
mentation required that indicated the assessment was done?
OSHA does not require an employer to document that the facility has been evaluated
for the presence of permit spaces. If they are present at an employer’s facility, post
signs and warn employees. If an employer has confined spaces that are not permit
spaces, they need to be reevaluated if there are changes in how they are used or
configured. These changes could make a non-permit space become a permit space.
Rescue
Can an employer have a general rescue plan and customize it when having an actual
entry and add additional conditions or rescue equipment to be used?
OSHA does not provide details on how to develop rescue plans. The standard does
require necessary rescue equipment to be listed on the permit before an entry starts.
It’s up to the employer to decide how they will develop their rescue plans, but need to
be detailed enough so that rescues will be efficient and effective.
What is the best method for retrieval from a horizontal space, and is it required to
monitor the entrants breathing zone (or as close as possible) as done in a vertical
confined space entry?
Rescues for horizontal entries are essentially the same as for vertical entries. The
entrant must wear a harness attached to a retrieval line (or wristlets if a harness is
infeasible). The retrieval line may be attached to a manually operated winch to facilitate
the non-entry rescue or, in the case of a horizontal entry, the rescue team may be able
to pull on the rope to remove the entrant — practice drills will let demonstrate whether
or not this is feasible.
And, with any entry, the harness and retrieval line are not necessary if their use would
not help the rescue. If the entrant could get stuck on obstructions while being removed
or if the retrieval line could get tangled up with an airline hose or anything else, then it
would be infeasible to use the harness and line. In this case, the rescue team must
enter the space to rescue the entrant in case of an emergency.
Training
that at least one member of the rescue team who has a current certification in first aid
and CPR is available on the team.
When and how must employers inform employees about the presence of permit–
required confined spaces?
OSHA clarified the standard in July 22, 1998 Letter of Interpretation in which the agency
says “Once an employer has determined a permit–required confined space exists (a
confined space with an actual or potential hazard), the employer is obligated by para-
graph 1910.146(c)(2) to inform exposed employees either by posting a sign or other
effective means. Since the purpose of this paragraph is to provide the exposed employ-
ees with information to protect them from the hazard, the ‘when’ an employee must be
informed is before the next entry.”
In the compliance directive on permit–required confined spaces (CPL 2.100) OSHA
states, “Ordinarily, information about permit spaces is most effectively and economi-
cally communicated through the use of signs. Consequently, signs would be the
principal method of warning under the standard. Alternative methods, such as addi-
tional training, may be used where they are truly effective in warning all employees who
could reasonably be expected to enter the space. It is the employer’s obligation to
assure that an alternative method is at least as effective as a sign. In some cases,
employers may have to provide training in addition to signs, to protect employees who
do not speak English or who would have difficulty understanding or interpreting signs.”
OSHA’s directive considers locked entry ports and states, “If a space has a locked entry
cover or panel, or an access door that can only be opened with special tools, the use
of signs may be unnecessary if the employer ensures that all affected employees are
informed about such spaces and know that they are not to be opened without taking
proper precautions, including temporary signs, to restrict unexpected or unknowing
entry.”
Written Program
If an employer chooses not to allow employees to enter confined spaces, how would
this affect their written program and training requirements?
If employees will not enter permit spaces, the employer must first take effective mea-
sures to prevent employees from entering the permit spaces. One way to do this is to
lock the entrance or otherwise make it unlikely that someone could enter it. In addition,
the employer must meet the standard’s requirements for:
• Evaluating the workplace to identify permit spaces,
• Posting signs or otherwise informing employees of the danger of the permit
spaces,
• Reevaluating spaces as needed after changes in configurations or use, and
• Sharing information with contract employers who may enter the permit
spaces.
An employer would not have any other written program or training requirements.
Reserved
Reserved
D–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–D
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
E
Table of Contents
9/14 E–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
2–E 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Applicability
Does the standard impact customers that are end-users of electricity, but do not
generate, transmit, or distribute it?
The scope of the standard covers the operation and maintenance of electric power
generation, control, transformation, transmission, and distribution lines and equipment.
If an employer is not engaged in any of these activities, the requirements would not
apply. An employer is also exempt if they have supplementary electric generating
equipment that is used to supply a workplace for emergency or standby purposes only.
Also, the standard does not apply if an employer has an emergency generator. An
emergency generator, as would all of a facilities electrical equipment, falls under 1910
Subpart S, “Electrical.”
Contractors
If we are the considered the contract employer, do our employees have to follow the
host employers work rules?
The standard does not require that specifically; however, a contractor does have to
coordinate their work rules and procedures with the host employer’s work rules and
procedures. This way both groups of workers are protected.
Fall Protection
Do qualified workers that are climbing or moving around on poles need to use fall
protection?
Yes. These employees need to use fall protection, unless the employer can demon-
strate that is infeasible or would create a greater hazard that not using it. OSHA
considered “climbing” to include going up and down the pole.
First Aid
• Work involving the use of mechanical equipment, other than insulated aerial
lifts, near parts energized at more than 600 volts, and
• Other work that exposes an employee to electrical hazards greater than, or
equal to, the electrical hazards posed by operations listed specifically in para-
graphs (b)(3)(i)(A) through (b)(3)(i)(D).
The reason for the two-person rule is that the second person can begin to administer
CPR within four minutes after an employee loses consciousness due to an electric
shock.
How must employers select the proper protective clothing and equipment?
Appendix E to Subpart V provides guidance relating to:
• How to select clothing that does not ignite,
• How to select protective clothing with an acceptable arc rating, and
• When the standard requires arc-rated head and face protection.
Do employers have to pay for the flame-resistant and arc-rated clothing and other
arc-flash protective equipment required by the standard?
Yes. As required by OSHA’s general rules on employer payment for personal protective
equipment under 1910.132(h) and 1926.95(d)), employers must pay for the flame-
resistant and arc-rated clothing and other arc-flash protective equipment required by
the electric power generation, transmission, and distribution standard.
Training
Reserved
Applicability
Emergency Contacts
Evacuation
Notification
How can an alarm system be effective in noisy work areas, or in areas where hearing
impaired employees are working?
Alarm devices are commonly equipped with both visual and audible alarms. A strobe
light can be activated in conjunction with the audible alarm. Employers should contact
an alarm service provider for more information on the type of alarms available, and for
guidance on the optimal placement of alarms in their facility.
Training
Reserved
Access
How much space must be left clear around eyewashes and showers?
The OSHA standard only says that emergency eyewashes/showers, “be provided
within the work area for immediate emergency use.” And the ANSI standard says that
the path of travel to an emergency eyewash and shower must be “free of obstructions
that may inhibit its immediate use.” Obviously, if any items or equipment are placed
around a unit, it would likely impede immediate use.
Applicability
which the contents are to be sampled or withdrawn and employees are expected to
perform such tasks, then, certainly, an eyewash and/or emergency shower would be
needed where this task is to occur.”
Ask:
1. Are injurious corrosive materials present onsite? (Refer to the SDS for guid-
ance)
2. Are employees exposed?
If the answer to both of these questions is ‘yes,’ then an emergency eyewash and/or
shower is required. If the answer is ‘no’ to either of those questions, then a unit would
not need to be provided.
Ultimately, OSHA expects the employer to determine the level of potential risk to
employees and provide protection accordingly.
Should an eyewash be made available to remove metal fragments, wood chips, etc.?
OSHA says that eyewashes (and showers) are intended to be used for strong acids and
alkilis. That doesn’t mean, however, that they wouldn’t be useful under other circum-
stances. In these cases, employers should consult with a medical professional
regarding the best course of treatment when workers are exposed to potential eye
hazards.
Battery Charging
Capacity
Does it matter whether a 16 gallon flow station vs. a plumbed eyewash unit is used?
Are both in compliance?
OSHA permits the use of a self-contained eyewash unit IF that unit can supply 15
minutes of flushing fluid, but it also must provide the required flow rate of .4 gallons per
minute. A 16 gallon self-contained unit would likely be able to provide 15 minutes of
flushing at the required flow rate, but must be verified through testing. It would be
compliant provided all other eyewash requirements were met.
Enforcement
equipment… .” Without the ANSI standard, employers would find it difficult to demon-
strate to OSHA exactly how their eyewash and/or shower units were “suitable”
exclusive to the regulatory language under 1910.151(c) since it is limited and vague.
Flushing Fluid
Inspection
For combination units, must both the eyewash and shower be functional for use?
ANSI Z358.1-2009 says that components of combination units must operate individu-
ally and simultaneously.
Installation
Do older units that don’t meet the requirements in ANSI Z358.1-2009 need to be
replaced?
Yes. OSHA uses the newest version of the ANSI emergency eyewash and shower
standard as an enforcement tool to determine a unit’s “suitability” as required under
1910.151(c). If a unit does not meet the standards outlined by ANSI, then OSHA may
consider the unit to be “unsuitable,” and therefore; in violation of the OSHA standard.
Location
How far away does an eyewash or shower need to be from an electrical panel?
OSHA and ANSI only address this issue by saying that emergency flushing facilities
must be in the work area for immediate emergency use and that those facilities must
not take more than 10 seconds to reach from where the hazard is located. ANSI says
that an individual covers approximately 55 feet in that timeframe. As such, an employer
does have some latitude on eyewash and/or shower placement. If the electrical panel
would pose an additional risk due to exposure while using eyewash and/or shower,
then ANSI says it must be relocated or moved.
Maintenance
Can eyewashes be covered to prevent contamination, rust, etc. when not in use?
The ANSI standard says that “nozzles and flushing fluid units must be protected from
airborne contaminants. Whatever means is used to afford such protections, its removal
shall not require a separate motion by the operators when activating the unit.” Covers
cannot be used unless they are specifically designed by and installed to the eyewash
manufacturer’s specifications (e.g., nozzle covers). In other words, a plastic bag,
bucket, shower cap, etc. cannot be placed over the nozzles of an eyewash if it would
require a motion to remove before the eyewash could be activated. Remember, a
user’s hands need to be free to aid in proper flushing or the removal of clothing.
Operation
How much water must be delivered via an eyewash or shower while in operation?
An eyewash must supply 0.4 gallons per minute of flushing fluid for at least 15 minutes.
Many self-contained and portable eyewash units only have a capacity of 5 to 10 gallons
for a maximum usefulness of 5 minutes. Squeeze bottles and other personal eyewash
have even lower water capacities. For this reason, the applicable ANSI standard says
that personal wash units (e.g., bottles) do not meet the criteria of plumbed or self-
contained eyewash equipment. As such, personal wash units can provide immediate
flushing to support plumbed or self-contained equipment, but not replace them. Also,
self-contained eyewash equipment that cannot provide the full 15 minutes of required
flushing is also considered supplementary.
Showers must supply 20 gallons of flushing fluid per minute for 15 minutes under all
operating conditions.
What is the height requirement for the water streams coming out of an eyewash
station?
ANSI Z358.1-2009 says that eyewash flushing fluid (plumbed and self-contained units)
must cover the areas between the interior and exterior lines of the gauge at some point
less than 8 inches above the eyewash nozzle.
Types
Reserved
Ergonomics
Lifting
3/14 Ergonomics–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
several tools, including a document from Washington State OSHA that contains a
Lifting Hazard Assessment Worksheet based on the 1991 NIOSH Revised Lifting
Equation.
Beyond this information, employers may want to contact an ergonomist for guidance on
the specific operation in question.
2–Ergonomics 3/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
3/14 Ergonomics–3
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
4–Ergonomics 3/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Work Stations
3/14 Ergonomics–5
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
6–Ergonomics 3/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Exit Routes
Access
Design
Doors
May a door equipped with a fire door and a fusible link be used as an exit?
These types of doors may not be marked as an exit and used as a means of egress.
If, during an emergency (i.e., a fire), the door was activated via the fusible link and
closed over the regular door, employees could not escape. This would be a violation of
1910.36(d)(2) which states, “exit route doors must be free of any device or alarm that
could restrict emergency use of the exit route...”
Can exit doors be locked if employees are trained on how to open them?
No. OSHA requires under 1910.36(d) that “employees must be able to open an exit
route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge.” [bold
emphasis added] OSHA further emphasizes this requirement in a December 19, 1991
Letter of Interpretation that clearly states exit doors must not be locked or obstructed
in any way or at any time.
Lighting
Must exit signs be lit by emergency lighting in the event of a power failure or other
emergency?
OSHA requires at 1910.37(b)(6) that each exit sign “be illuminated to a surface value
of at least five foot-candles by a reliable light source.” If emergency lighting provides the
necessary illumination then that is all that is needed. However, if emergency lighting
were to fail, and the exit signs were not properly illuminated, then the employer would
be in violation of the standard.
Obstructions
Is a conveyor with a gate that must be lifted to access an exit route considered an
obstruction?
OSHA states at 1910.37(a)(3) that “exit routes must be free and unobstructed. No
materials or equipment may be placed, either permanently or temporarily, within the
exit route.” OSHA defines an exit route as “a continuous and unobstructed path of exit
travel from any point within a workplace to a place of safety.” [bold emphasis added]
The NFPA 101-2009, “Life Safety Code,” also says that an exit discharge must be free
and unobstructed.
Signs
Reserved
Extension Cords
Assembly
Inspection
Those cords found to be damaged or defective must not be used until repaired or
replaced.
Power Strips
Repair
Temporary Wiring
Use
Is a GFCI required for fans that are temporarily connected to an extension cord?
Plugging the cord of the fan into an extension cord which is then plugged into the
permanent wiring of the building that has grounding protection in the outlet would seem
to provide adequate protection, but since that extension cord is considered to be
temporary wiring, the fan would need a GFCI per 1910.304(b)(3)(ii).
However, OSHA discusses this topic in a December 21, 1999 Letter of Interpretation
which says:
“For example, if a GFCI-type receptacle is used, it must be visibly marked “No Equip-
ment Ground,” and equipment required to be grounded may not be used in the
ungrounded, GFCI-type receptacle. However, many appliances (i.e., lamps; toasters;
televisions; double insulated appliances) and tools (i.e., double insulated tools; tools
supplied with a low voltage isolating transformer) are not required to be grounded and
they may be used in an ungrounded, GFCI-type receptacle. The GFCI feature of these
GFCI-type receptacles provides additional electrocution protection in the event of mis-
use (i.e., a floor buffing machine is powered by a 3-prong plug from a properly marked
and wired ungrounded, GFCI-type receptacle).”
Contact Lenses
Eyeglasses
Can employees wear eyeglasses while wearing eye and face protection?
Yes, but special care must be taken when choosing eye protection for employees who
wear eyeglasses with corrective lenses, such as the following:
• Prescription spectacles, with side shields and protective lenses meeting the
requirements of ANSI Z87.1, that also correct the individual employee’s vision.
• Goggles that can fit comfortably over corrective eyeglasses without disturbing
the alignment of the eyeglasses.
• Goggles that incorporate corrective lenses mounted behind protective lenses.
What maintenance and care is required for eye and face protection?
It is important that all eye and face protection be kept clean and properly maintained.
Cleaning is particularly important where dirty or fogged lenses could impair vision. Eye
and face protection should be inspected, cleaned, and maintained at regular intervals
so that equipment provides the requisite protection.
It is also important to ensure that contaminated equipment which cannot be decon-
taminated is disposed of in a manner that protects employees from exposure to
hazards.
Selection
Are there certain jobs that require eye and face protection?
OSHA does not specify which jobs require the use of safety glasses or other types of
PPE as it’s up to the employer to provide appropriate protection based on the results
of the hazard assessment.
However, OSHA does provide some guidance to employers in “Appendix B to Subpart
I to Part 1910 — Non-Mandatory Compliance Guidelines for Hazard Assessment and
Personal Protective Equipment Selection,” which includes the following:
“Some occupations (not a complete list) for which eye protection should be routinely
considered are: carpenters, electricians, machinists, mechanics and repairers, mill-
wrights, plumbers and pipe fitters, sheet metal workers and tinsmiths, assemblers,
sanders, grinding machine operators, lathe and milling machine operators, sawyers,
welders, laborers, chemical process operators and handlers, and timber cutting and
logging workers. ...”
The Appendix also includes an eye and face protection selection chart which may be
helpful to employers.
Training
What training is required before eye and face protection can be used?
Training must be provided to employees who are required to use eye and face pro-
tection and include the following:
• When eye and face protection is necessary;
• How improper fit, use, or maintenance can compromise its protective effects;
• Limitations and capabilities of the eye and face protection;
• How to properly don, doff, adjust, and wear the protection; and
• Proper care, maintenance, useful life, and disposal.
A record of this training must be kept that contains:
• The name of each employee who received the training,
• The date(s) of the training, and
• Information that identifies the subject covered during the training.
Use
Welding
How dark do the lenses on welding helmets and safety goggles need to be?
The intensity of light or radiant energy produced by welding, cutting, or brazing opera-
tions varies according to a number of factors including the task producing the light, the
electrode size, and the arc current. To protect employees who are exposed to intense
radiant energy, begin be selecting a shade too dark to see the welding zone. Then try
lighter shades until one is found that allows a sufficient view of the welding zone without
going below the minimum protective shade.
Reserved
3/14 F/G–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Construction .................................................................................... 1
Fall Protection .................................................................................. 2
Inspection........................................................................................ 2
Platforms......................................................................................... 3
Retrofitting ....................................................................................... 3
Flammable Liquids ................................................................................ 1
Bonding and Grounding ..................................................................... 1
Cabinets ......................................................................................... 2
Containers ....................................................................................... 4
Definitions ....................................................................................... 4
Gasoline ......................................................................................... 5
Storage ........................................................................................... 6
Transfer .......................................................................................... 7
2–F/G 3/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Fall Protection
Height
Loading Docks
Fall Protection–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
damaged personal protective equipment shall not be used.” Also, the manufacturer
may also have specific maintenance or care instructions and/or recommended guide-
lines regarding the longevity and use of the harness/lanyard.
Portable Ladders
Rolling Stock
2–Fall Protection
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Roofs
Safety Chains
Can safety chains be used for fall protection in lieu of a standard railing?
OSHA does permit the use of safety chains and has addressed the issue in two Letters
of Interpretation (LOI). In the first, dated February 12, 1982, OSHA makes mention of
chains with regard to safety gates by saying, “if in fact the safety chains used for top
and intermediate rails afford employees protection “at least as effective as” the swing-
ing gate, the safety chains would be adequate and noted as a de minimis violation.”
[bold emphasis added] The top rail must have a vertical height of 42 inches nominal
and the intermediate rail must be approximately halfways between the top rail and the
floor as required by 1910.23(d).
In the second LOI, dated June 03, 1983, OSHA says, “as specified in the standard, the
anchoring of posts and installation of chains for railings must be of such construction
that the completed structure shall be capable of withstanding a load of at least 200
pounds applied in any direction at any point on the top rail.” [bold emphasis added]
Fall Protection–3
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
The requirement is that a guardrail be installed, but safety chains would be permitted
if it was done to mimic a standard railing requirements as stated above. A single chain,
however, would not meet these requirements.
Swinging Gates
4–Fall Protection
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Applicability
Evacuation
that while not required, OSHA may cite employers under The General Duty Clause if an
incident were to occur and it could be demonstrated that a fire drill would have pre-
vented it.
Also, fire prevention and response is something that involves local emergency
responders; therefore, coordination with them or a local fire marshal would be consid-
ered a best practice.
Notification
How can an alarm system be effective in noisy work areas, or in areas where hearing
impaired employees are working?
Alarm devices are commonly equipped with both visual and audible alarms. A strobe
light can be activated in conjunction with the audible alarm. Employers should contact
an alarm service provider for more information on the type of alarms available, and for
guidance on the optimal placement of alarms in their facility.
Training
First Aid
Applicability
Does the medical services and first aid standard apply to all types of businesses?
The standard applies to all employers in general industry, regardless of size, except for
state and local government entities and employers that fall under the jurisdiction of
other federal agencies.
Bloodborne Pathogens
Certification
Emergency Response
What does OSHA consider to be “in near proximity to the workplace” with regard to
outside medical assistance?
The phrase “in near proximity to the workplace” does not directly relate to any specific
distance. In medical emergencies, response time is a more relevant measure. Suffi-
cient response time for medical assistance is to be based on an assessment of
workplace hazards and the possible outcomes that could occur.
While OSHA used to use a 3 to 4 minute response time for suffocation, severe bleeding,
or other life threatening injury or illness, and a 15 minute response time for non-life
threatening emergencies, that is not longer OSHA’s policy. In a April 18, 2002 LOI, the
agency says, “As an employer would not know in advance whether a life-threatening
injury would occur, an employer should not use the 15-minute (non-life-threatening)
time frame for determining the quantity and location of first aid supplies; however, the
3–4 minute (life-threatening) time frame would be acceptable.”
Can employers be held liable for the first aid it renders to workers?
OSHA addresses this issue in a December 11, 1996 LOI, which states:
“Question 2: “If an emergency situation were to occur where first aid was necessary
and a trained employee were to panic, forgetting all of their training, and no first aid or
improper first aid was administered could the employer be cited?”
Answer: If a trained employee were to panic in an emergency situation and not
administer first aid or administer improper first aid, OSHA would not cite the employer.
The employer would have met his obligation under the standard by having individuals
trained to render first aid. The standard only requires employees to be trained in first
aid, but does not address the actual performance of first aid in an emergency situation.
Please note, however, that OSHA would conduct an investigation, if deemed neces-
sary, to ensure that proper training certification, e.g., First Aid and CPR certificates
were in order.”
Employees themselves would be covered under a state’s Good Samaritan law if appli-
cable.
This does not entirely address the issue of liability, however. A company can be sued
by nearly anyone at nearly anytime for nearly anything. Injuries in the workplace usually
fall under Workers’ Compensation laws though.
Responders
Training
Reserved
Inspection
Location
Log
Must a first aid log be kept of the number and quantity of supplies?
Neither OSHA nor ANSI requires that employers maintain a first aid log.
Quantity
Securement
need to ensure that employees and/or first aid providers/emergency responders can
get to the key and the supplies in an emergency.
Supplies
Reserved
Fixed Ladders
Construction
7 inches from the rung to the wall as a suggested ‘depth’ of ladder steps. OSHA
addresses the ‘extension of ladder rungs’ in 1910.27(d)(3), and provides Figure D-10
as a visual aid.
Fall Protection
Is fall protection required when a fixed ladder is not equipped with a cage?
As with portable ladders, OSHA does not require personal fall protection be used on
fixed ladders less than 20 feet in height. However, employers should assess the situ-
ation and provide fall protection if a fall hazard is present. For example, if the ladder is
located outside and subject to environmental conditions (e.g., ice and snow) which may
make it unsafe for climbing, additional fall protection may be warranted.
Inspection
Platforms
Retrofitting
Are there any exemptions for fixed ladders installed or built prior to the standard?
OSHA addresses this issue in a May 27, 2004 LOI in which the agency says, “The
1910.27 standard which was promulgated in 1971 does not have “grandfather” provi-
sions that would allow the fixed ladders built prior to the publication of the standard to
be exempt from 1910.27 requirements. Therefore, ladders and associated safety cages
(built and installed prior to the publication of the OSHA 1910.27 standard) which do not
meet 1910.27 requirements must be retrofitted to meet 1910.27 requirements, if they
are used by the employees of the workplace.”
Reserved
Flammable Liquids
What are the requirements for grounding when transferring flammable liquids
between containers?
OSHA says at 1910.106(e)(6)(ii) that grounding must take place when dispensing into
containers for Category 1 or 2 flammable liquids, or Category 3 flammable liquids with
a flashpoint below 100°F (37.8°C) unless the nozzle and container are electrically
interconnected. If the metallic floorplate on which the container stands while filling is
electrically connected to the fill stem or if the fill stem is bonded to the container during
filling operations by means of a bond wire, then the transfer is considered grounded.
Cabinets
Can flammable and corrosive chemicals be stored in the same storage cabinet?
Yes, assuming that the chemicals are being stored in accordance with the manufac-
turers’ requirements, in approved containers, and inside an approved storage cabinet.
You should refer to the chemical’s Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for specific storage require-
ments.
storage which allows employers to store up to 25 gallons of Category 1 and 120 gallons
of Categories 2, 3, and 4 in containers in any one “fire area” of the facility outside a
flammable storage cabinet or storage room. However, it is always a best practice to do
so.
Also, local or state fire code may dictate storage requirements; therefore, contact local
fire authorities as they generally know what OSHA requires as well as local and state
fire code and will be the best source of information regarding storage.
Also, an employer’s liability insurance carrier may require or restrict the storage of
flammable materials, which may affect insurance rates.
Other types of materials stored around and/or on top of the cabinets must adhere to
general housekeeping requirements under 1910.22(a), and 1910.106(e)(9) which will
tend to control leakage and prevent the accidental escape of flammable liquids. All
spills must be cleaned up promptly.
What must be done with a flammable storage cabinet that is no longer in use?
If the storage cabinet is not being used for flammable storage, the markings should be
removed. If the cabinet is also a special color which indicated that it was used for
flammable storage, consider checking with local fire authorities to see if it should be
repainted. This would prevent first responders from mistaking them for actual flam-
mable storage during an emergency. After that, an employer may do with it as they
wish.
Containers
Definitions
Gasoline
storage which allows employers to store up to 25 gallons of Category 1 and 120 gallons
of Categories 2, 3, and 4 in containers in any one “fire area” of the facility outside of
flammable storage cabinet or storage room.
Also, local or state fire code may dictate storage requirements; therefore, contact local
fire authorities as they generally know what OSHA requires as well as local and state
fire code and will be the best source of information regarding storage.
Also, an employer’s liability insurance carrier may require or restrict the storage of
flammable materials, which may affect insurance rates.
Storage
How much flammable liquid can be stored inside a building and not be in a flammable
storage cabinet, room, or area?
OSHA generally expects that all flammable liquids as defined at 1910.106(a)(19) will be
kept in a flammable storage cabinet, inside storage room, or flammable storage ware-
house per 1910.106(d).
There is an exemption for incidental storage at 1910.106(e)(2)(i) which allows the
storage of up to 25 gallons of Category 1 and 120 gallons of Categories 2, 3, and 4 in
containers in any one “fire area” of a facility outside a flammable storage cabinet or
storage room.
Also, local or state fire code may dictate storage requirements; therefore, contact local
fire authorities as they generally know what OSHA requires as well as local and state
fire code and will be the best source of information regarding storage.
Also, an employer’s liability insurance carrier may require or restrict the storage of
flammable materials, which may affect insurance rates.
Transfer
How must large quantities of flammable liquids be transferred (e.g., from tank
trucks)?
OSHA requires at 1910.106(h)(4)(iii) that the transfer of large quantities of flammable
liquids must be through piping by means of pumps or water displacement. Gravity flow
can’t be used except as required in process equipment. The use of compressed air as
a transferring medium is prohibited.
Reserved
Hazard Communication.......................................................................... 1
Applicability ..................................................................................... 1
Classification.................................................................................... 1
Consumer Products........................................................................... 3
Definitions ....................................................................................... 4
Inventory List ................................................................................... 5
Labeling .......................................................................................... 5
Portable Containers ......................................................................... 10
Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) ............................................................... 10
Training ......................................................................................... 16
Written Program.............................................................................. 19
9/14 H–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–H 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Hazard Communication
Applicability
Classification
• Aspiration hazard.
The criteria for determining whether a chemical is classified as a health hazard are
detailed in Appendix A to 1910.1200, “Health Hazard Criteria.”
As such, chemicals which are classified as combustible dust hazards must must
include the signal word “warning” and the following hazard statement on their labels
and SDSs: “May form combustible dust concentrations in the air.”
Consumer Products
Does the quantity of household consumer products purchased at one time matter
(e.g., purchasing a case of drain cleaner)?
Regardless of quantities, if a consumer product is used in the workplace for the pur-
pose intended by the chemical manufacturer, and the use is similar to the duration and
frequency that could reasonably be expected by consumers when used in a household,
then it falls under the consumer product exemption under the HazCom standard.
Definitions
The hazardous nature of the chemical and the potential for exposure are the factors
which determine whether a chemical is covered under the HazCom standard. If it’s not
hazardous, it’s not covered. If there is no potential for exposure (e.g., the chemical is
inextricably bound and cannot be released), the rule does not cover the chemical.
Inventory List
Labeling
Can pictograms with black borders be used if only shipping within the United States?
All pictograms must have red borders set at a point with a black hazard symbol on a
white background, sufficiently wide to be clearly visible. . OSHA believes that the use
of the red frame will increase recognition and comprehensibility. Therefore, the red
frame is required regardless of whether the shipment is domestic or international.
Can an employer use NFPA and HMIS labeling systems for in-house chemicals?
OSHA says that employers may choose to label workplace containers either with the
same label that would be on shipped containers for the chemical, or with label alter-
natives that meet the requirements for the standard.
Alternative labeling systems such as the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
704 Hazard Rating and the Hazardous Material Information System (HMIS) are per-
mitted for workplace containers. However, the information supplied on these labels
must be consistent with the HazCom standard (e.g., no conflicting hazard warnings or
pictograms.)
In short, employers may continue to use their current in-house labeling systems, but
those labels may not be used on containers leaving the workplace.
Moreover, since these alternative labels would, at a minimum, only provide the product
identifier and “general” information regarding the hazards of the chemicals, the
employer must also make “specific” information regarding the physical and health
hazards of the chemical immediately available to employees through other means.
And, employers must train employees on both the GHS-style labels and any in-house
labeling system.
How does HazCom/GHS labeling requirements differ from NFPA or HMIS labeling
systems?
HazCom/GHS uses hazard categories. NFPA and HMIS uses hazard ratings. These
systems run opposite of each other.
Under HazCom/GHS, hazard categories usually begin at “1” for the most severe and
“4” or “5” for the least severe hazards. Some hazard categories are identified by an “A”,
“B”, or other letter of the alphabet. The number identifying the hazard category will not
appear on the label — only on the SDS for the product. This is different from NFPA and
HMIS labels. The only numbers appearing on the GHS-style label will be any product
identification numbers and the phone number of the chemical manufacturer or importer.
How must very small containers that don’t have enough space for all the required
label information be labeled when shipped?
According to 1910.1200(f)(5), each container of hazardous chemicals leaving the work-
place must be labeled, tagged, or marked in accordance with the labeling requirements
in this standard in a way that does not conflict with the requirements of the Hazardous
Materials Transportation Act and regulations issued under that Act by the Department
of Transportation (DOT).
For the containers inside that outer packaging, each must be marked with a GHS-style
label defined at 1910.1200(f)(1). Currently, OSHA does not regulate the outer shipping
container based on a September 13, 1993 Letter of Interpretation. However, employers
must follow all applicable Department of Transportation Hazardous Materials labeling
requirements.
Portable Containers
Is a single SDS allowed for the same chemical from different suppliers?
According to a September 08, 2004 Letter of Interpretation, OSHA states that the
HazCom standard allows substitution of one SDS for others of similar formulations, but
the employer then assumes an increased level of responsibility.
OSHA writes “…the employer may rely on a single MSDS to convey the hazard infor-
mation for chemical products of the same formulation supplied by different
manufacturers. If the employer chooses to do this…“[the employer] must ensure that
the specific identity on the MSDS can be cross referenced to the corresponding label
of the hazardous chemical containers.
Second, the employer must ensure that employees are informed during the hazard
communication training of this practice of using one MSDS as representative of all
vendors, otherwise it could lead to confusion.
Third, the MSDS [the employer] select[s] must have complete and accurate information
as required by section (g)(3) of the HCS.
And finally, the standard requires that the MSDS contain the name, address and tele-
phone number of the party who prepares or distributes the MSDS. The party listed must
be able to provide additional information on the hazardous chemicals or clarification of
the information on the MSDS, as well as, additional emergency procedures, if neces-
sary, in lieu of the actual manufacturer. A chemical manufacturer, importer, or distributor
may not wish to and is not required to act as the responsible party for a chemical that
they did not produce.””
May manufacturers supply SDSs via the Internet as an alternative to paper or other
SDS formats?
Some manufacturers may consider SDS information to be proprietary, and would not
want to post this information for public access. Other manufacturers, however, have
taken advantage of the Internet and use this as a vehicle for the downstream flow of
hazard information. OSHA suggests that manufacturers who use the Internet to supply
SDSs to downstream users do the following:
• Document that customers have access to the Internet and are willing to
retrieve SDSs from this source.
• Provide these customers with a letter giving them the Internet address of all
SDSs.
• Ensure that the most current SDS is always available on the Internet. In the
event of a significant change in health hazard information, some positive
means of contact, such as a letter or e-mail notification, stating that the SDS
has changed and the updated version is available would be required.
• In the event of system failure or on-line access delays, a reliable back-up for
quickly receiving the required information must be available.
Training
Must employers retrain new hires if they have already received HazCom training?
It is not necessary that an employer retrain each new hire if that employee has received
prior training by a past employer, an employee union, or any other entity. General
information, such as the rudiments of the HazCom standard could be expected to
remain with an employee from one position to another. The employer, however, main-
tains the responsibility to ensure that their employees are adequately trained and are
equipped with the knowledge and information necessary to conduct their jobs safely.
As such, it is likely that additional training will be needed since employees must know
the specifics of their new employers’ programs such as where the SDSs are located,
details of the employer’s in-plant labeling system if it is different than that required by
the standard, and the hazards of new chemicals to which they will be exposed. For
example, 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii) requires that employees be trained on the measures they
can take to protect themselves from hazards, including specific procedures the
employer has implemented such as work practices, emergency procedures, and per-
sonal protective equipment to be used. An employer, therefore, has a responsibility to
evaluate an employee’s level of knowledge with regard to the hazards in the workplace,
their familiarity with the requirements of the standard, and the employer’s hazard com-
munication program.
Do employees who do not handle or have contact with chemicals need to be trained?
For locations “where employees only handle chemicals in sealed containers which are
not opened under normal conditions of use (such as are found in marine cargo han-
dling, warehousing, or retail sales)” OSHA states at 1910.1200(b)(4) that employers
must:
• Ensure that labels on incoming containers of hazardous chemicals are not
removed or defaced;
• Maintain copies of any safety data sheets that are received with incoming
shipments of the sealed containers of hazardous chemicals, must obtain a
SDS as soon as possible for sealed containers of hazardous chemicals
received without a safety data sheet if an employee requests the safety data
sheet, and must ensure that the safety data sheets are readily accessible
during each work shift to employees when they are in their work area(s); and
• Ensure that employees are provided with information and training in accor-
dance with paragraph (h) of this standard (except for the location and
availability of the written hazard communication program under paragraph
(h)(2)(iii)), to the extent necessary to protect them in the event of a spill or leak
of a hazardous chemical from a sealed container.
Written Program
9/12 I/J/K–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–I/J/K 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Annual Summary
How are the “total hours worked” calculated when there are both hourly and tempo-
rary workers?
To calculate the total hours worked by all employees, include the hours worked by
salaried, hourly, part-time and seasonal workers, as well as hours worked by other
workers supervised (e.g., workers supplied by a temporary help service). Do not
include vacation, sick leave, holidays, or any other non-work time even if employees
were paid for it. If the establishment keeps records of only the hours paid or if the
employer has employees who are not paid by the hour, the hours that the employees
actually worked must be estimated.
This calculation is important when the number of workers changes from month to
month. Some companies increase their workforce during the summer, or use a tem-
porary workers to meet production demands, and need to calculate their average for
the year.
If there are no recordable cases for the year is an annual summary still required to be
completed, certified, and posted?
Yes. After the end of the year, employers must review the Log to verify its accuracy,
summarize the 300 Log information on the 300A Summary form, and certify the sum-
mary. This information must then be posted for three months, from February 1 to April
30.
How are injuries or illnesses to employees from a temporary help service recorded?
The employer who supervises the temporary employees on a day-to-day basis must
record the case. The employer and the temporary help service should coordinate
efforts to make sure that each injury and illness is recorded only once: either on on the
employer’s OSHA 300 Log (if day-to-day supervision is provided) or on the other
employer’s OSHA 300 Log (if that company provides day-to-day supervision).
Days Away
How is a work-related injury or illness that results in days away from work recorded?
When an injury or illness involves one or more days away from work, the employer
must record the injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log with a check mark in the space
for cases involving days away and an entry of the number of calendar days away from
work in the number of days column. If the employee is out for an extended period of
time, the employer must enter an estimate of the days that the employee will be away,
and update the day count when the actual number of days is known.
Is there a limit to the number of days away from work that must be counted?
Yes, the total days away may be “capped” at 180 calendar days. An employer is not
required to keep track of the number of calendar days away from work if the injury or
illness resulted in more than 180 calendar days away from work and/or days of job
transfer or restriction. In such a case, entering 180 in the total days away column is
considered adequate.
May the day count stop if an employee who is away from work because of an injury
or illness retires or leaves my company?
Yes, if the employee leaves the company for some reason unrelated to the injury or
illness (e.g., retirement, plant closing, another job), the employer may stop counting
days away from work or days of restriction/job transfer. If the employee leaves the
company because of the injury or illness, the total number of days away or days of
restriction/job transfer must be estimated and the day count entered on the 300 Log.
If a case occurs in one year but results in days away during the next calendar year,
is the case recorded in both years?
No, the injury or illness is only recorded once. The employer must enter the number of
calendar days away for the injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log for the year in which
the injury or illness occurred. If the employee is still away from work because of the
injury or illness when the annual summary is prepared, estimate the total number of
calendar days the employee is expected to be away from work. Use this number to
calculate the total for the annual summary, and then update the initial log entry later
when the day count is known or reaches the 180-day cap.
How is an injury or illness recorded when a physician or other licensed health care
professional recommends that the worker stay at home but the employee comes to
work anyway?
The employer must record these injuries and illnesses on the OSHA 300 Log using the
check box for cases with days away from work and enter the number of calendar days
away recommended by the physician or other licensed health care professional. If a
physician or other licensed health care professional recommends days away, you
should encourage your employee to follow that recommendation.
However, the days away must be recorded whether the injured or ill employee follows
the physician or licensed health care professional’s recommendation or not. If the
employer receives recommendations from two or more physicians or other licensed
health care professionals, they may make a decision as to which recommendation is
the most authoritative, and record the case based upon that recommendation.
How is a case handled when a physician or other licensed health care professional
recommends that the worker return to work but the employee stays at home anyway?
In this situation, the employer must end the count of days away from work on the date
the physician or other licensed health care professional recommends that the
employee return to work.
How are weekends, holidays, or other days the employee would not have worked
anyway counted?
The employer must count the number of calendar days the employee was unable to
work as a result of the injury or illness, regardless of whether or not the employee was
scheduled to work on those day(s). Weekend days, holidays, vacation days, or other
days off are included in the total number of days recorded if the employee would not
have been able to work on those days because of a work–related injury or illness.
How is a case recorded in which a worker is injured or becomes ill on a Friday and
reports to work on a Monday, and was not scheduled to work on the weekend?
The employer needs to record this case only if information is received from a physician
or other licensed health care professional indicating that the employee should not have
worked, or should have performed only restricted work, during the weekend. If so, the
employer must record the injury or illness as a case with days away from work or
restricted work, and enter the day counts, as appropriate.
If an employee who sustains a work-related injury requiring days away from work is
terminated for drug use based on the results of a post-accident drug test, how is the
case recorded?
Under section 1904.7(b)(3)(vii), the employer may stop counting days away from work
if an employee who is away because of an injury or illness leaves the company for
some reason unrelated to the injury or illness, such as retirement or a plant closing.
However, when the employer conducts a drug test based on the occurrence of an
accident resulting in an injury at work and subsequently terminates the injured
employee, the termination is related to the injury. Therefore, the employer must esti-
mate the number of days that the employee would have been away from work due to
the injury and enter that number on the 300 Log.
OSHA 300 Log. If the employee leaves the company for some reason(s) related to the
injury or illness, the employer must make an estimate of the count of days away from
work or days of restriction/job transfer expected for the particular type of case.
Exceptions
5. Personal tasks – Injuries or illnesses are not recordable if they happen when an
employee is doing personal tasks that are unrelated to their job and the activity is
outside of assigned working hours. For example, an employee comes in after work and
uses a conference room to work on a child’s science project.
OSHA has ruled that breaks (e.g., lunch breaks) are within assigned working hours. As
such, an employee who falls down and gets hurt during a smoking break is not exempt
because the break was within assigned working hours. Also, an employee who stays
after hours to finish a project is not performing a personal task, and any injury would be
work-related. To be exempt, both conditions must be in place.
6. Personal grooming – An injury or illness is not recordable if it is solely the result of
personal grooming, self medication for a non–work–related condition, or is intentionally
self–inflicted. For example, an employee has an allergic reaction to a personal medi-
cation.
However, if an employee falls and is injured while showering to remove a contaminant
that he was exposed to on the job, it would be a recordable incident.
And although drug and alcohol use fall under this exception, an injury must be solely
the result of drug or alcohol use to not be recordable. If a post-accident drug test is
positive, it is reasonable to think that impaired judgment lead to the accident. However,
the accident may not have been solely caused by the drug as other workplace factors
may have contributed.
7. Vehicle accidents – If the injury or illness is caused by a vehicle accident in a
company parking lot or company access road while the employee is commuting to or
from work, it is not recordable.
Other injuries in the parking lot or access road are work-related and potentially record-
able. Company parking lots are part of the work environment because the employee is
present as a condition of employment. If an employee is injured by slipping on ice or
tripping in a pothole while walking from car to building, it would be recordable.
However, if an employee is struck by a car in the company parking lot, the injury is not
recordable because the employer has no control over the driver of the vehicle. The
same is true for injuries that occur in public parking lots or on public streets. They are
not recordable because the employer has no control over conditions in these areas –
they are not part of the employers “work environment.”
8. Common cold and flu – The common cold or flu is not recordable, even if the
illnesses are contracted at work. However, other infectious diseases like tuberculosis,
brucellosis, or hepatitis A must be evaluated for work relationships. If an employee is
infected at work through exposure to another worker’s blood, then the case is record-
able.
9. Mental illness – Mental illness is not recordable unless the employee voluntarily
provides an opinion from a physician or licensed health care professional (e.g., psy-
chiatrist, psychologist) stating that the employee has a mental illness that is work–
related. For example, an employee who witnesses a serious accident is traumatized
and requires time away from work.
First Aid
• Removing foreign bodies from the eye using only irrigation or a cotton swab;
• Removing splinters or foreign material from areas other than the eye by
irrigation, tweezers, cotton swabs, or other simple means;
• Using finger guards;
• Using massages (physical therapy or chiropractic treatment are considered
medical treatment for recordkeeping purposes); or
• Drinking fluids for relief of heat stress.
This is a complete list of all treatments and no other procedures are included in first aid
for recordkeeping purposes.
What are “other simple means” of removing splinters that are considered first aid?
“Other simple means” of removing splinters would include methods that are reasonably
comparable to the methods already listed in the standard (i.e., irrigation, tweezer,
cotton swabs). Using needles, pins, or small tools to extract splinters would generally
be included.
or other purposes, where there is no work-related injury or illness, are not first aid or
medical treatment, and do not in themselves make the case recordable. However,
when inoculations are given in response to workplace exposure, medical treatment has
been rendered and the case must be recorded.
Forms
Job Transfer
Are transfers to another job recorded in the same way as restricted work cases?
Yes, both job transfer and restricted work cases are recorded in the same box on the
OSHA 300 Log. For example, if the employer assigns, or a physician or other licensed
health care professional recommends that the employer assigns, an injured or ill worker
to his or her routine job duties for part of the day and to another job for the rest of the
day, the injury or illness involves a job transfer. An injury or illness that involves a job
transfer must be recorded by placing a check in the box for job transfer.
How long must a modification to a job last before it can be considered a permanent
modification?
A permanent restriction or transfer is one that is expected to last for the remainder of
the employee’s career. Where the restriction or transfer is determined to be permanent
at the time it is ordered, the employer must count at least one day of the restriction or
transfer on the Log. If the employee whose work is restricted or who is transferred to
another job is expected to return to his or her former job duties at a later date, the
restriction or transfer is considered temporary rather than permanent.
Medical Treatment
What if medical treatment is recommended but the employee does not follow it?
If a physician or other licensed health care professional recommends medical treat-
ment, the employer should encourage the injured or ill employee to follow that
recommendation. However, the case must be recorded even if the injured or ill
employee does not follow the recommendation.
New Cases
Parking Lots
If an employee is walking across a parking lot when and struck by a car driven by
another employee who is coming to work and both employees are seriously injured
in the accident is either case work-related?
Neither employee’s injuries are recordable. While the employee parking lot is part of the
work environment in accordance with 1904.5, injuries occurring there are not work-
related if they meet the exception at 1904.5(b)(2)(vii). Specifically, 1904.5(b)(2)(vii)
excepts injuries caused by motor vehicle accidents occurring on the company parking
lot while the employee is commuting to and from work. In the case in question, both
employees’ injuries resulted from a motor vehicle accident in the company parking lot
while the employees were commuting. Accordingly, the exception applies.
Postings
Recording Criteria
Recordkeeping
Do I have to update the OSHA 300 Log during required the five-year storage period?
Yes, during the storage period, the employer must update stored OSHA 300 Logs to
include newly discovered recordable injuries or illnesses and to show any changes that
have occurred in the classification of previously recorded injuries and illnesses. If the
description or outcome of a case changes, the employer must remove or line out the
original entry and enter the new information.
How would the employer record the change on the OSHA 300 Log for an injury or
illness after the injured worker reached the cap of 180 days for restricted work and
then was assigned to “days away from work”?
The employer must check the box that reflects the most severe outcome associated
with a given injury or illness. The severity of any case decreases on the log from column
G (Death) to column J (Other recordable case). Since days away from work is a more
severe outcome than restricted work the employer is required to remove the check
initially placed in the box for job transfer or restriction and enter a check in the box for
days away from work (column H). Employers are allowed to cap the number of days
away and/or restricted work/job transfer when a case involves 180 calendar days. For
purposes of recordability, the employer would enter 180 days in the “Job transfer or
restriction” column and may also enter 1 day in the “Days away from work” column to
prevent confusion or computer related problems.
Reporting
Restricted Work
How is a work-related injury or illness that results in restricted work or job transfer
recorded?
When an injury or illness involves restricted work or job transfer but does not involve
death or days away from work, the employer must record the injury or illness on the
OSHA 300 Log by placing a check mark in the space for job transfer or restriction and
an entry of the number of restricted or transferred days in the restricted workdays
column.
Does restricted work or job transfer have to be recorded if it applies only to the day
on which the injury occurred or the illness began?
No. Restricted work or job transfers do not have to be recorded if the employer, or the
physician or other licensed health care professional, impose the restriction or transfer
only for the day on which the injury occurred or the illness began.
How is a case recorded where the worker works only for a partial work shift because
of a work-related injury or illness?
A partial day of work is recorded as a day of job transfer or restriction for recordkeeping
purposes, except for the day on which the injury occurred or the illness began.
How are vague restrictions such as “light duty” or “take it easy for a week” handled?
If an employer is not clear about the physician or other licensed health care profes-
sional’s recommendation, they may ask that person whether the employee can do all
of his or her routine job functions and work all of his or her normally assigned work shift.
If the answer to both of these questions is ‘yes,’ then the case does not involve a work
restriction and does not have to be recorded as such. If the answer to one or both of
these questions is ‘no,’ the case involves restricted work and must be recorded as a
restricted work case.
If the employer is unable to obtain this additional information from the physician or other
licensed health care professional who recommended the restriction, record the injury or
illness as a case involving restricted work.
What if an employee does all of his or her routine job functions despite recom-
mended work restrictions?
The injury or illness must be recorded on the OSHA 300 Log as a restricted work case.
If a physician or other licensed health care professional recommends a job restriction,
the employer should ensure that the employee complies with that restriction. If the
employer receives recommendations from two or more physicians or other licensed
health care professionals, a decision must be made as to which recommendation is the
most authoritative, and the case must be recorded based upon that recommendation.
If an employee who routinely works ten hours a day is restricted from working more
than eight hours following a work-related injury, is the case recordable?
Generally, the employer must record any case in which an employee’s work is restricted
because of a work-related injury. A work restriction, as defined in 1904.7(b)(4)(i)(A),
occurs when the employer keeps the employee from performing one or more routine
functions of the job, or from working the full workday the employee would otherwise
have been scheduled to work. In this situation, the case is recordable if the employee
would have worked 10 hours had he or she not been injured.
How long must a modification to a job last before it can be considered a permanent
modification?
A permanent restriction or transfer is one that is expected to last for the remainder of
the employee’s career. Where the restriction or transfer is determined to be permanent
at the time it is ordered, the employer must count at least one day of the restriction or
transfer on the Log. If the employee whose work is restricted or who is transferred to
another job is expected to return to his or her former job duties at a later date, the
restriction or transfer is considered temporary rather than permanent.
Work-Relatedness
Are there situations where an injury or illness occurs in the work environment and is
not considered work-related?
Yes, an injury or illness occurring in the work environment that falls under one of the
exceptions in 1904.5(b)(2) is not work-related, and therefore is not recordable.
What if it is not obvious whether the event or exposure occurred in the work envi-
ronment or away from work?
In these situations, the employer must evaluate the employee’s work duties and envi-
ronment to decide whether or not one or more events or exposures in the work
environment either caused or contributed to the resulting condition or significantly
aggravated a pre-existing condition.
Is an injury or illness work-related if the employee is traveling at the time the injury
or illness occurs?
Injuries and illnesses that occur while an employee is traveling are work-related if, at
the time of the injury or illness, the employee was engaged in work activities “in the
interest of the employer.” Examples of such activities include:
• Travel to and from customer contacts;
• Conducting job tasks; and
• Entertaining or being entertained to transact, discuss, or promote business
(work-related entertainment includes only entertainment activities being
engaged in at the direction of the employer).
Injuries or illnesses that occur when the employee is traveling do not have to be
recorded if the employee has:
• Checked into a hotel or motel for one or more days – When a traveling
employee checks into a hotel, motel, or into a other temporary residence, he
or she establishes a “home away from home.” The employer must evaluate
the employee’s activities after checking in for their work-relatedness in the
same manner as the employer would evaluate the activities of a non-traveling
employee. When the employee checks into the temporary residence, he or
she is considered to have left the work environment. When the employee
begins work each day, he or she re-enters the work environment. If the
employee has established a “home away from home” and is reporting to a
fixed worksite each day, you also do not consider injuries or illnesses work-
related if they occur while the employee is commuting between the temporary
residence and the job location.
• Taken a personal detour from a reasonably direct route of travel (i.e., has
taken a side trip).
How is it decided if a case is work-related when the employee is working from home?
Injuries and illnesses that occur while an employee is working at home, including work
in a home office, will be considered work-related if the injury or illness occurs while the
employee is performing work for pay or compensation in the home, and the injury or
illness is directly related to the performance of work rather than to the general home
environment or setting.
For example, if an employee drops a box of work documents and injures his or her foot,
the case is considered work-related. If an employee is injured because he or she trips
on the family dog while rushing to answer a work phone call, the case is not considered
work-related. If an employee working at home is electrocuted because of faulty home
wiring, the injury is not considered work-related.
If an employee stays at work after normal work hours to prepare for the next day’s
tasks and is injured, is the case work-related?
A case is work-related any time an event or exposure in the work environment either
causes or contributes to an injury or illness or significantly aggravates a pre-existing
injury or illness, unless one of the exceptions in 1904.5(b)(2) applies. The work envi-
ronment includes the establishment and other locations where one or more employees
are working or are present as a condition of their employment. This case would be
work-related if the employee was injured as a result of an event or exposure at work,
regardless of whether the injury occurred after normal work hours.
Inspections
Checklists
Corrective Actions
9/12 Inspections–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
nothing is done to correct the situation, this information could be used against a com-
pany in future enforcement proceedings.
Equipment
Frequency
2–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Personnel
Recordkeeping
9/12 Inspections–3
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Required Inspections
4–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
3/13 Inspections–5
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
6–Inspections 3/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Inspections–7
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Recordkeeping: The building owner must keep a certification record of each inspec-
tion (and test) that includes:
• The date of the inspection;
• The signature of the person who performed the inspection; and
• The number, or other identifier, of the building support structure
and equipment which was inspected.
Working platforms
When: Before every use and after each occurrence which could affect the
platform’s structural integrity.
What: The employer must inspect working platforms and their compo-
nents.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Maintenance
When: Prior to each work cycle or every 30 days.
What: A competent person must perform a maintenance inspection of
each platform installation following procedures recommended by
the manufacturer.
Recordkeeping: None required.
8–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Hoist
When: Each day before lowering personnel below the top elevation of the
building.
What: Test the hoist in the lifting direction with the intended load to make
certain it has sufficient capacity to raise personnel back to the
boarding level.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Category: Personal Fall Arrest System (Appendix C to 1910.66, Section 1
- Mandatory)
When: Prior to use.
What: Inspect personal fall arrest systems for:
• Mildew,
• Wear,
• Damage, and
• Other deterioration.
Defective components must be removed from service if their
strength or function may be adversely affected.
Recordkeeping: None required.
9/12 Inspections–9
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
10–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
3/13 Inspections–11
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Equipment repairs
When: Unspecified.
What: The individual in responsible charge must inspect the area(s)
where hot work (e.g., welding or cutting operations), use of spark-
producing power tools, and chipping operations are conducted to
be sure that it is safe for the work to be done and that safe proce-
dures will be followed for the work specified.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Bulk plants
Hoses and couplings
When: At intervals appropriate to the service.
What: Inspect all pressure hoses and couplings by performing a test with
the hose extended and using the “inservice maximum operating
pressures” to determine material deteriorations, signs of leakage,
or weakness in the hose carcass or at the couplings.
Recordkeeping: None required.
12–Inspections 3/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
3/13 Inspections–13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
What: At least one personal knowledgeable about the process must con-
duct a compliance audit to verify that the procedures and practices
developed under the Process Safety Management standard are
adequate and being followed.
Recordkeeping: A report must be developed that includes:
• Audit findings,
• Responses to each of the findings, and
• Corrective actions to deficiencies.
The two most recent audit reports must be retained.
Process equipment
When: At intervals consistent with applicable manufacturers’ recommen-
dations and good engineering practices (more frequently if
determined to be necessary by prior operating experience).
What: Inspect process equipment following recognized and generally
accepted good engineering practices to assure that equipment is
installed properly and consistent with design specifications and the
manufacturer’s instructions.
Recordkeeping: A record must be kept of each inspection that includes:
• The date,
• The name of the person who performed the inspection,
• The serial number, or other identifier, of the equipment which
was inspected;
• A description of the inspection; and
• The results of the inspection.
Category: Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response
(1910.120)
Safety and health program
When: As necessary.
What: The site safety and health supervisor (or another individual who is
knowledge in occupational safety and health) must conduct inspec-
tions to determine the effectiveness of the site safety and health
plan.
Recordkeeping: A written safety and health program must be kept on site.
Equipment
When: Prior to use.
What: Inspect all equipment to be used during clean-up work after the
emergency response is complete to ensure that it is in serviceable
condition.
Recordkeeping: None required.
14–Inspections 3/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Inspections–15
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
16–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Inspections–17
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
18–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Machines or equipment
When: Before lockout or tagout devices are removed and energy is
restored.
What: The authorized employee must inspect the work area to ensure
that nonessential items have been removed and that machine or
equipment components are operationally intact.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Employees
When: Before lockout or tagout devices are removed and energy is
restored.
What: The authorized employee must check the work area to ensure that
all employees have been safely positioned or moved.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Category: Fire Brigades (1910.156)
9/12 Inspections–19
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
20–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Refillable containers
When: At least semi-annually.
What: A trained employee must inspect the weight and pressure of refill-
able containers.
If the container has a loss in net content or weight of more than 5
percent or a loss of pressure more than 10 percent, it must be
corrected.
Recordkeeping: The date of the inspection (and any required maintenance) must be
recorded:
• On the container,
• On a tag attached to the container, or
• In a central location.
A record of the last semi-annual check must be maintained until the
container is checked again or for the life of the container, whichever
is less.
Non-refillable containers
When: At least semi-annually.
What: A trained employee must inspect the weight of non-refillable con-
tainers which have no means of pressure indication.
If the container shows a loss in net weight or more than 5 percent
it must be replaced.
If the container has a loss in net content or weight of more than 5
percent or a loss of pressure more than 10 percent, it must be
corrected.
Recordkeeping: The date of the inspection (and any required maintenance) must be
recorded:
• On the container,
• On a tag attached to the container, or
• In a central location.
A record of the last semi-annual check must be maintained until the
container is checked again or for the life of the container, whichever
is less.
9/12 Inspections–21
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Wheel components
When: Prior to assembly.
What: Inspect multi-piece wheel components and single piece wheels for:
• Bends affecting the shape,
• Pits from corrosion,
• Breaks,
• Cracks,
• Damaged or leaky valves.
Defective wheel and wheel components may not be used and must
be marked or tagged unserviceable and removed from the service
area.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Operation
When: After tire inflation.
What: Inspect tire and wheel components while still within the restraining
device to make sure that they are properly seated and locked.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Category: Powered Industrial Trucks (1910.178)
When: At least daily before use and after each shift when the vehicle is
being used around the clock.
What: Inspect the forklift for conditions which may adversely affect the
safety of the vehicle in accordance with the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations.
Defects must be immediately reported and corrected.
Recordkeeping: None required.
22–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Inspections–23
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
What: Inspect:
• All functional operating mechanisms for maladjustment interfer-
ing with proper operation (daily inspection required);
• Lines, tanks, valves, drain pumps, and other parts of the air or
hydraulic systems for deterioration or leakage (daily inspection
required);
• Hooks for deformation or cracks (daily inspection required);
• Hoist chains, including end connections, for excessive wear,
twist, distorted links that interfere with proper function or stretch
beyond the manufacturer’s recommendations (daily inspection
required);
• All functional operating mechanisms for excessive wear of com-
ponents;
• Rope reeving for noncompliance with the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations; and
• All ropes for deterioration that would result in appreciable loss of
original strength (at least monthly inspection required).
All deficiencies must be carefully examined to determine whether
they constitute a safety hazard.
Recordkeeping: A certification document must be generated monthly of hook, hoist
chain, and rope* inspections that includes:
• The date;
• The signature of the person who performed the inspection; and
• A serial number, name, or other identifier of the hook, chain, or
rope that was inspected.
*Rope inspection records must be kept on file where readily avail-
able to appointed personnel.
24–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
What: Inspect:
• All functional operating mechanisms for maladjustment interfer-
ing with proper operation;
• Lines, tanks, valves, drain pumps, and other parts of the air or
hydraulic systems for deterioration or leakage;
• Hooks for deformation or cracks;
• Hoist chains, including end connections, for excessive wear,
twist, distorted links that interfere with proper function or stretch
beyond the manufacturer’s recommendations;
• All functional operating mechanisms for excessive wear of com-
ponents;
• Rope reeving for noncompliance with the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations;
• Deformed, cracked, or corroded members;
• Loose bolts or rivets;
• Cracked or worn sheaves and drums;
• Worn, cracked, or distorted parts (e.g., pins, bearings, shafts,
gears, rollers, locking, and clamping devices);
• Excessive wear on brake system parts, linings, pawls, and ratch-
ets;
• Load, wind, and other indicators over their full range for any
significant inaccuracies;
• Gasoline, diesel, electric, or other power plants for improper per-
formance or noncompliance with applicable safety requirements;
• Chain drive sprockets for excessive wear and excessive chain
stretch;
• Electrical apparatus for signs of pitting or any deterioration of
controller contactors, limit switches, and pushbutton stations;
and
• All ropes for deterioration by an appointed person whose
approval is required for further use of the rope (at least monthly
inspection required).
All deficiencies must be carefully examined to determine whether
they constitute a safety hazard.
Recordkeeping: A certification document must be generated monthly of hook, hoist
chain, and rope* inspections that includes:
• The date;
• The signature of the person who performed the inspection; and
• A serial number, name, or other identifier of the hook, chain, or
rope that was inspected.
*Rope inspection records must be kept on file where readily avail-
able to appointed personnel.
9/12 Inspections–25
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Cranes which have been idle for one month or more, but less than
six months
When: Before placing in service.
What: Inspect:
• All functional operating mechanisms for maladjustment interfer-
ing with proper operation;
• Lines, tanks, valves, drain pumps, and other parts of the air or
hydraulic systems for deterioration or leakage;
• Hooks for deformation or cracks;
• Hoist chains, including end connections, for excessive wear,
twist, distorted links that interfere with proper function or stretch
beyond the manufacturer’s recommendations;
• All functional operating mechanisms for excessive wear of com-
ponents;
• Rope reeving for noncompliance with the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations; and
• All ropes for deterioration by an appointed person whose
approval is required for further use of the rope.
All deficiencies must be carefully examined to determine whether
they constitute a safety hazard.
Recordkeeping: A certification document must be generated of the rope inspection
that includes:
• The date;
• The signature of the person who performed the inspection; and
• An identifier for the ropes that were inspected.
The record must be made available for inspection.
26–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Cranes which have been idle for more than six months
When: Before placing in service.
What: Inspect:
• All functional operating mechanisms for maladjustment interfer-
ing with proper operation;
• Lines, tanks, valves, drain pumps, and other parts of the air or
hydraulic systems for deterioration or leakage;
• Hooks for deformation or cracks;
• Hoist chains, including end connections, for excessive wear,
twist, distorted links that interfere with proper function or stretch
beyond the manufacturer’s recommendations;
• All functional operating mechanisms for excessive wear of com-
ponents;
• Rope reeving for noncompliance with the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations;
• Deformed, cracked, or corroded members;
• Loose bolts or rivets;
• Cracked or worn sheaves and drums;
• Worn, cracked, or distorted parts (e.g., pins, bearings, shafts,
gears, rollers, locking, and clamping devices);
• Brake system parts, linings, pawls, and ratchets for excessive
wear;
• Load, wind, and other indicators over their full range for any
significant inaccuracies;
• Gasoline, diesel, electric, or other power plants for improper per-
formance or noncompliance with applicable safety requirements;
• Chain drive sprockets for excessive wear and excessive chain
stretch;
• Electrical apparatus for signs of pitting or any deterioration of
controller contactors, limit switches, and pushbutton stations;
and
• All ropes for deterioration by an appointed person whose
approval is required for further use of the rope.
All deficiencies must be carefully examined to determine whether
they constitute a safety hazard.
Recordkeeping: A certification document must be generated of the rope inspection
that includes:
• The date;
• The signature of the person who performed the inspection; and
• An identifier for the ropes that were inspected.
The record must be made available for inspection.
9/12 Inspections–27
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Standby cranes
When: At least semi-annually.
What: Inspect:
• All functional operating mechanisms for maladjustment interfer-
ing with proper operation;
• Lines, tanks, valves, drain pumps, and other parts of the air or
hydraulic systems for deterioration or leakage;
• Hooks for deformation or cracks;
• Hoist chains, including end connections, for excessive wear,
twist, distorted links that interfere with proper function or stretch
beyond the manufacturer’s recommendations;
• All functional operating mechanisms for excessive wear of com-
ponents;
• Rope reeving for noncompliance with the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations; and
• All ropes for deterioration by an appointed person whose
approval is required for further use of the rope.
All deficiencies must be carefully examined to determine whether
they constitute a safety hazard.
Recordkeeping: A certification document must be generated of the rope inspection
that includes:
• The date;
• The signature of the person who performed the inspection; and
• An identifier for the ropes that were inspected.
The record must be made available for inspection.
28–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Inspections–29
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
30–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
What: Inspect:
• All control mechanisms for maladjustment interfering with proper
operation;
• All control mechanisms for excessive wear of components and
contamination by lubricants or other foreign matter;
• All safety devices for malfunction;
• Air or hydraulic systems for deterioration or leakage;
• Hooks for deformation or cracks;
• Electrical apparatus for malfunctioning and signs of excessive
deterioration, dirt, and moisture accumulation;
• Rope reeving for noncompliance with the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations;
• Deformed, cracked, or corroded members in the crane structure
and boom;
• Loose bolts or rivets;
• Cracked or worn sheaves and drums;
• Worn, cracked, or distorted parts (e.g., pins, bearings, shafts,
gears, rollers, and locking devices);
• Brake system parts, linings, pawls, and ratchets for excessive
wear;
• Load, boom angle, and other indicators over their full range for
any significant inaccuracies;
• Gasoline, diesel, electric, or other power plants for improper per-
formance or noncompliance with applicable safety requirements;
• Chain drive sprockets for excessive wear and excessive chain
stretch;
• Travel steering, braking, and locking devices for malfunction;
• Tires for damage and excessive wear; and
• All ropes for deterioration that would result in appreciable loss of
original strength by an appointed or authorized person whose
approval is required for further use of the rope (at least monthly
inspection required).
All deficiencies must be carefully examined to determine whether
they constitute a safety hazard.
Recordkeeping: A certification document must be generated monthly of critical
items in use (e.g., brakes, hooks, and ropes) that includes:
• The date;
• The signature of the person who performed the inspection; and
• A serial number, name, or other identifier of the crane that was
inspected.
Inspection records must be kept on file where readily available.
9/12 Inspections–31
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Cranes which have been idle for one month or more, but less than
six months
When: Before placing in service.
What: Inspect:
• All control mechanisms for maladjustment interfering with proper
operation;
• All control mechanisms for excessive wear of components and
contamination by lubricants or other foreign matter;
• All safety devices for malfunction;
• Air or hydraulic systems for deterioration or leakage;
• Hooks for deformation or cracks;
• Electrical apparatus for malfunctioning and signs of excessive
deterioration, dirt, and moisture accumulation;
• Rope reeving for noncompliance with the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations; and
• All ropes for all types of deterioration by an appointed or autho-
rized person whose approval is required for further use of the
rope.
All deficiencies must be carefully examined to determine whether
they constitute a safety hazard.
Recordkeeping: A certification document must be generated of the rope inspection
that includes:
• The date;
• The signature of the person who performed the inspection; and
• An identifier for the ropes that were inspected.
The record must be made available for inspection.
32–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Inspections–33
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Standby cranes
When: At least semi-annually or more frequently if exposed to adverse
environmental conditions.
What: Inspect:
• All control mechanisms for maladjustment interfering with proper
operation;
• All control mechanisms for excessive wear of components and
contamination by lubricants or other foreign matter;
• All safety devices for malfunction;
• Air or hydraulic systems for deterioration or leakage;
• Hooks for deformation or cracks;
• Electrical apparatus for malfunctioning and signs of excessive
deterioration, dirt, and moisture accumulation;
• Rope reeving for noncompliance with the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations; and
• All ropes for all types of deterioration by an appointed or autho-
rized person whose approval is required for further use of the
rope.
All deficiencies must be carefully examined to determine whether
they constitute a safety hazard.
Recordkeeping: A certification document must be generated of the rope inspection
that includes:
• The date;
• The signature of the person who performed the inspection; and
• An identifier for the ropes that were inspected.
The record must be made available for inspection.
34–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Inspections–35
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
36–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
What: Inspect:
• All control mechanisms for adjustment, wear, and lubrication;
• All chords and lacing;
• Tension in guys;
• Plumb of the mast;
• Air or hydraulic systems for deterioration or leakage;
• Hooks for deformation or cracks;
• Electrical apparatus for malfunctioning and signs of excessive
deterioration, dirt, and moisture accumulation;
• Rope reeving for noncompliance with the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations;
• Hoist brakes, clutches, and operating levers for proper function;
• Structural members for deformations, cracks, and corrosion;
• Bolts and rivets for tightness;
• Pins, bearings, shafts, gears, sheaves, drums, rolling, and lock-
ing and clamping devices for wear, cracks, and distortion;
• Gudgeon pin for cracks, wear, and distortion (each time the der-
rick is to be erected);
• Power plants for proper performance and compliance with appli-
cable safety requirements;
• Foundation or supports for continued ability to sustain the
imposed loads; and
• All ropes for deterioration that would result in appreciable loss of
original strength (at least monthly inspection required).
All deficiencies must be carefully examined to determine whether
they constitute a safety hazard.
Recordkeeping: A certification document must be generated of the rope inspection
that includes:
• The date;
• The signature of the person who performed the inspection; and
• An identifier for the ropes that were inspected.
The record must be made available for inspection.
9/12 Inspections–37
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Derricks which have been idle for one month or more, but less than
six months
When: Before placing in service.
What: Inspect:
• All control mechanisms for adjustment, wear, and lubrication;
• All chords and lacing;
• Tension in guys;
• Plumb of the mast;
• Air or hydraulic systems for deterioration or leakage;
• Hooks for deformation or cracks;
• Electrical apparatus for malfunctioning and signs of excessive
deterioration, dirt, and moisture accumulation;
• Rope reeving for noncompliance with the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations;
• Hoist brakes, clutches, and operating levers for proper function;
and
• All ropes for all types of deterioration.
All deficiencies must be carefully examined to determine whether
they constitute a safety hazard.
Recordkeeping: A certification document must be generated of the rope inspection
that includes:
• The date;
• The signature of the person who performed the inspection; and
• An identifier for the ropes that were inspected.
The record must be made available for inspection.
38–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Inspections–39
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Standby derricks
When: At least semi-annually.
What: Inspect:
• All control mechanisms for adjustment, wear, and lubrication;
• All chords and lacing;
• Tension in guys;
• Plumb of the mast;
• Air or hydraulic systems for deterioration or leakage;
• Hooks for deformation or cracks;
• Electrical apparatus for malfunctioning and signs of excessive
deterioration, dirt, and moisture accumulation;
• Rope reeving for noncompliance with the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations;
• Hoist brakes, clutches, and operating levers for proper function;
and
• All ropes for all types of deterioration.
All deficiencies must be carefully examined to determine whether
they constitute a safety hazard.
Recordkeeping: A certification document must be generated of the rope inspection
that includes:
• The date;
• The signature of the person who performed the inspection; and
• An identifier for the rope that was inspected.
The record must be made available for inspection.
Category: Helicopters (1910.183)
When: Prior to lifting a load.
What: Inspect the size and weight of loads and the manner in which they
are connected to the helicopter.
A lift may not be made if the helicopter operator believes the lift
cannot be made safely.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Category: Slings (1910.184)
When: Daily before use and during use where service conditions warrant.
What: A competent person designated by the employer must inspect the
sling and all fastenings for damage or defects.
Damaged or defective slings must be immediately removed from
service.
Recordkeeping: None required.
40–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Pull-out devices
When: At the start of each operator’s shift, following a new die set-up, and
when operators are changed.
What: Visually inspect pull-out devices for proper adjustment
9/12 Inspections–41
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
42–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Inspections–43
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
44–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Inspections–45
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Digester
When: As specified under 29 CFR 1910.134, Respiratory Protection.
What: Inspect gas masks used for protection against sulfurous acid and
chlorine gases as specified under 29 CFR 1910.134, Respiratory
Protection.
Recordkeeping: As specified under 29 CFR 1910.134, Respiratory Protection.
Lifting equipment
When: Regularly.
Regularly. Inspect all lifting equipment to ensure that they are in safe condi-
tion.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Category: Bakery Equipment (1910.263)
When: If bakery: At least twice a month.
What: An appointed, properly instructed bakery employee must inspect all
of the safety devices on each oven.
Recordkeeping: None required.
46–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Chains
When: Before initial use and weekly thereafter.
What: Inspect chains used in load carrying service for stretching.
Any three foot length of chain that has stretched one-third the
length of a link must be discarded.
Recordkeeping: None required.
9/12 Inspections–47
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
48–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Machines
When: Before initial use during each workshift.
What: Inspect each machine, including any provided by an employee, for
defects or damage.
Damaged or defective machines must be repaired or replaced
before work is commenced.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Vehicles
When: Before initial use during each workshift.
What: Inspect each vehicle used to perform any logging operation for
defects or damage.
Damaged or defective vehicles must be repaired or replaced
before work is commenced.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Category: Telecommunications (1910.268)
Support structures
When: Before use.
What: A competent person must inspect the support structure of pole
structures, platforms, ladders, walkways or other elevated struc-
ture, or aerial device to determine that it is:
• Adequately strong,
• In good working condition,
• Properly secured in place.
Recordkeeping: None required.
9/12 Inspections–49
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Ladders
When: As specified under 29 CFR 1910.25, Portable Wood Ladders;
1910.26, Portable Metal Ladders; and 1910.27, Fixed Ladders.
What: A competent person must inspect ladders for (at a minimum*):
• Strength,
• Condition,
• Proper securement,
• Sharp edges,
• Burrs,
• Decay,
• Corrosion, and
• Cracks.
*Additional inspection parameters are specified under 29 CFR
1910.25, Portable Wood Ladders; 1910.26, Portable Metal Lad-
ders; and 1910.27, Fixed Ladders.
Recordkeeping: None required.
50–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Tree trimming
When: Before climbing, entering, or working around any tree.
What: The employee and the foremen or supervisor in charge must
closely inspect the area to determine whether an electrical power
conductor passes through the tree or within reaching distance of an
employee who will be working in the tree.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Category: Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution
(1910.269)
General
When: At least annually.
What: The employer must conduct inspections to determine that each
employee is complying with required safety-related work practices.
Recordkeeping: None required.
9/12 Inspections–51
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
First aid
When: At least once a year.
What: Inspect first aid kits to ensure that expended items are replaced.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Lockout/tagout procedures
When: At least annually.
What: Where lockout is used: An authorized employee, other than the
one(s) utilizing the energy control procedure, must conduct an
inspection that includes an observation of the implementation of
the procedure and a review of each authorized employee’s respon-
sibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected.
Where tagout is used: An authorized employee, other than the
one(s) utilizing the energy control procedure, must conduct an
inspection that includes an observation of the implementation of
the procedure and a review of each authorized and affected
employee’s responsibilities under the energy control procedure
being inspected and the following:
• Tags are used only as warning devices and not as a physical
restraint on energy isolating devices that would otherwise require
the use of a lock;
• Tags are not removed without authorization of the authorized
person responsible for it or that it has not been bypassed,
ignored, or otherwise defeated;
• Tags are legible and understandable by all authorized employ-
ees, affected employees, and all other employees who work
operations are or may be in the area;
• Tags and their means of attachment are made of materials which
will withstand the environmental conditions encountered in the
workplace;
• Tags are securely attached to energy isolating devices so that
they cannot be inadvertently or accidentally detached during
use; and
• The meaning of tags is understood by employees as part of the
overall energy control program.
Any deviations or inadequacies found during the inspection must
be corrected.
Recordkeeping: A certification document must be kept of inspections that includes:
• The date;
• The name of the employees included in the inspection;
• The name of the person who performed the inspection; and
• The name, or other identifier, of the machine or equipment on
which the energy control procedure was being utilized.
52–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Live-line tools
When: Before use each day.
What: Visually inspect each live-line tool for defects.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Mechanical equipment
When: Before use on each workshift.
What: Visually inspect the critical safety components (i.e., those whose
failure would result in a free fall or free rotation of the boom) of
mechanical elevating and rotating equipment to ensure it is in safe
working condition.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Climbing ropes
When: Before each use.
What: Inspect rope for damage or defects.
Damaged and defective rope may not be used.
Recordkeeping: None required.
9/12 Inspections–53
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Boilers
When: Before internal furnace or ash hopper repair work is started.
What: Inspect overhead areas for possible falling objects.
If the hazard of fall objects exists, planking or nets must be pro-
vided as overhead protection.
Recordkeeping: None required
Wood poles
When: Before it is climbed.
What: A qualified employee should inspect the wood pole for:
• Buckling at the ground line,
• Unusual angle to the ground,
• Cracks,
• Holes,
• Shell rot and decay,
• Knots,
• Depth of setting,
• Soft, wet, or loose soil, and
• Burn marks.
A hammer and/or rocking test may also need to be conducted.
Recordkeeping: None required.
54–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Bucket elevators
When: If less than one million bushel permanent storage capacity
and absent motion detection and alignment monitoring
devices: Daily
What: Visually inspect bucket movement and tracking of the belt.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Category: Electrical - Wiring Design and Protection (1910.304)
When: Before use each day (unless they remain connected once put in
place and are not exposed to damage) or upon relocation.
What: Visually inspect each cord set, attachment cap, plug, and recep-
tacle and any equipment connected by cord and plug (except cord
sets and receptacles which are fixed and not exposed to damage)
for:
• External defects (e.g., deformed or missing pins, insulation dam-
age, etc.); and
• Evidence of possible internal damage.
Damaged and defective equipment may not be used until repaired.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Category: Electrical - Selection and Use of Work Practices (1910.333)
When: Before circuits or equipment are reenergized, even temporarily, as
necessary.
What: A qualified person must visually inspect all tools, electrical jumpers,
shorts, grounds, and other such devices to verify that they have
been removed.
Recordkeeping: None required.
9/12 Inspections–55
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
56–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Coking
When: To be determined by the employer.
What: Inspect coking operations to control door emissions to the maxi-
mum extent possible.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Pushing
When: At least weekly and after any green push.
What: Inspect heating flues and associated temperatures to prevent
green pushes.
9/12 Inspections–57
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Emissions
When: Regularly.
What: Inspect:
• All controls (i.e., goosenecks, standpipes, standpipe caps,
charging hold lids and casting, jumper pipes, and air seals);
• Damper system,
• Aspiration system,
• Collector main,
• Heating system, and
• Brickwork.
Repairs must be made as soon as possible.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Respiratory protection
When: As specified under 29 CFR 1910.134, Respiratory Protection.
What: As specified under 29 CFR 1910.134, Respiratory Protection.
Recordkeeping: As specified under 29 CFR 1910.134, Respiratory Protection.
58–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Housekeeping
When: Regularly.
What: Inspect operations involving liquid or solid methylenedianiline for
leaks, spills, and discharges.
Leaks must be repaired and spills cleaned up promptly.
Recordkeeping: None required.
Category: Ionizing Radiation (1910.1096)
When: Initially.
What: Inspect the signal-generating system to verify that the fabrication
and installation were made in accordance with design plans and
specifications as well as develop a thorough knowledge of the
performance of the system and all components under normal and
hostile conditions.
9/12 Inspections–59
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Training
60–Inspections 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
L
Table of Contents
Lockout/Tagout ..................................................................................... 1
Contractors ...................................................................................... 1
Definitions ....................................................................................... 1
Lockout ........................................................................................... 2
Locks ............................................................................................. 5
Minor Servicing................................................................................. 6
Periodic Inspections .......................................................................... 7
Procedures ...................................................................................... 8
Recordkeeping ............................................................................... 10
Shift Changes ................................................................................. 11
Tagout........................................................................................... 12
Training ......................................................................................... 13
L–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–L
Lockout/Tagout
Contractors
Definitions
Lockout/Tagout–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Lockout
What is “lockout?”
“Lockout” is the placement of a lockout device on an energy isolating device, in accor-
dance with an established procedure, ensuring that the energy isolating device and the
equipment being controlled cannot be operated until the lockout device is removed.
A lockout device is a device that utilizes a positive means such as a lock, either key or
combination type, to hold an energy isolating device in a safe position and prevent the
energizing of a machine or equipment. Included are blank flanges and bolted slip
blinds.
2–Lockout/Tagout
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Lockout is required if these activities take place during normal production where an
employee is required to remove or bypass a guard or place a part of the body into a
point of operation. The standard defines “normal production” as using equipment to
perform it’s intended function. During normal production, machine safeguards are in
place to protect workers.
The only exception is when minor servicing is being performed.
Must the entire machine be locked out if only part of it is being serviced?
OSHA’s lockout/tagout standard defines an energy isolating device as “a mechanical
device that physically prevents the transmission or release of energy, including but not
limited to the following: A manually operated electrical circuit breaker; a disconnect
switch; a manually operated switch by which the conductors of a circuit can be dis-
connected from all ungrounded supply conductors, and, in addition, no pole can be
operated independently; a line valve; a block; and any similar device used to block or
isolate energy. Push buttons, selector switches, and other control circuit type devices
are not energy isolating devices.”
The device needs to meet the above definition of an energy isolating device to satisfy
the standard’s requirements. If an employer determines that the device does not meet
the definition, then the energy supply needs to be tracked back to a disconnect switch
or circuit breaker which does meet the definition. An November 10, 1999 Letter of
Interpretation notes that the extent of the lockout procedures would depend on the
employees’ activities and their exposure to the hazards. If the maintenance/repair
activities will not expose employees to a certain hazard from a part of the equipment,
that portion of the equipment would not need to be deenergized. The letter includes the
following:
“Question #1: To what extent must an employer go to secure a hydraulic pump and
220/440 volt electric motor during a lockout? Some pressure usually remains within
hydraulic lines on the hydraulic systems, even when the system is shutdown.
“Reply: The standard provides the flexibility for each employer to develop an energy
control program, as set forth in 1910.147(c)(1), which is suited to the needs of the
particular workplace and the particular types of machines and equipment being main-
tained or serviced. The extent to which an employer must control hazardous energy
Lockout/Tagout–3
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
depends upon the type of servicing or maintenance work being performed, as well as
the type and magnitude of the energy. For example, a hydraulic pump overhaul or the
removal of a hydraulic line is much different, and requires different energy control
procedures, than working on a piece of equipment that is powered by the hydraulic
system. Also, working on the 220/440 volt, nominal, electrical motor is different than
working on either the hydraulic system or the equipment powered by the hydraulics.
“In some operations, the movement of a simple throw disconnect switch to the “off”
mode is a step sufficient to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source
as required by 1910.147(d)(3). In other cases, a series of predetermined steps may be
necessary to achieve an orderly shutdown of a machine or piece of equipment in order
to safely perform the servicing or maintenance work. This would be the case for the
hydraulic pump overhaul or hydraulic line maintenance tasks.
“The employer should perform hazardous energy analyses of the workplace equipment
and/or machinery to determine the specific procedures for the control of potentially
hazardous energy when employees are performing servicing and maintenance activi-
ties covered by the standard. This is a prerequisite shutdown preparation step,
described in 1910.147(d)(1), which requires authorized employees to have knowledge
concerning the type and magnitude of the energy, the hazards associated with the
energy to be controlled, and the methods or means to control the energy prior to
shutting off the machine or equipment for servicing and/or maintenance activities.
“Question #2: If an employer secures the system motor (by service panel lockout)
against unauthorized or accidental use and no energy hazards related specifically to
the hydraulic system are known to exist, does OSHA commonly accept this adequate
lockout protection?
“Reply: Yes, but only if all of the provisions of the Lockout/Tagout standard, 1910.147
are met and all hazardous energy sources are effectively controlled. Whether a hydrau-
lic pump and motor is effectively locked or tagged out will have to be determined on a
case-by-case basis by the employer, who is ultimately responsible for the safety of
employees.”
There is nothing from OSHA to indicate that the employeer would need to have a
separate written procedure when the work being done only needs to have a portion of
the equipment locked out, but there is also nothing from OSHA to prohibit this practice
if it is determined that employees would be best protected by having a separate pro-
cedure.
When there is a group of workers, must each person apply their own lock?
When more than one person is doing the servicing and maintenance, the requirement
is that each authorized employee must apply his own lock to the group lockout device,
or group lock box. OSHA wants each individual worker to be protected by his or her own
lock. The easiest way to do this is to use a multi–lock hasp on the energy isolating
device. These hasps typically hold about six locks, so each mechanic can apply a lock
to the hasp.
4–Lockout/Tagout
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
When the job is more complicated, or when several mechanics are involved, employers
can reduce the number of locks needed by using “operations locks” and a group lock
box. In this commonly used method, the equipment is locked out by applying the
“operations locks” to the machine’s energy isolating devices. The person who applied
the locks then places the keys into a group lock box, and he applies his lock to the lock
box. Each other authorized employee then applies his or her own lock to the lock box.
At this point, no one can unlock the operations locks until all the locks are removed from
the lock box. If this method is used, each authorized employee must still have the
opportunity to verify that the equipment is locked out.
Locks
Can a lock be cut off if the person who applied it isn’t there to remove it?
First, the employer must have procedures to:
• Verify that the worker isn’t in the facility,
• Make all reasonable efforts to contact the employee and inform him that his
lock has been removed, and
• Make sure the employee knows that the lock has been removed before he
again starts work at the facility.
Lockout/Tagout–5
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
To remove the lock, a bolt cutters or master key may be used. OSHA says that it is
acceptable to use a master key if removing the lock is performed under the employer’s
direction and in accordance with the procedures above (these procedures and asso-
ciated training must be outlined in the employer’s energy control program). OSHA says,
“the ‘one person, one lock, one key’ practice is the preferred means and is accepted
across industry lines, but it is not the only method to meet the language of the stan-
dard.”
Minor Servicing
6–Lockout/Tagout
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
If the exception applies, the machine does not have to be locked out, but workers must
still be protected using machine safeguards.
Very importantly, during normal production lockout/tagout can and does apply under
certain circumstances.
Periodic Inspections
Lockout/Tagout–7
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Procedures
8–Lockout/Tagout
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Lockout/Tagout–9
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
on-demand signal. In this example, the single procedure would not provide adequate
instructions for the machine without a start/stop button.
Recordkeeping
10–Lockout/Tagout
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Shift Changes
Lockout/Tagout–11
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Tagout
What is tagout?
Tagout is the placement of a tagout device on an energy isolating device, in accordance
with an established procedure, to indicate that the energy isolating device and the
equipment being controlled may not be operated until the tagout device is removed.
A tagout device is a prominent warning device (e.g., a tag and a means of attachment)
which can be securely fastened to an energy isolating device in accordance with an
established procedure, to indicate that the energy isolating device and the equipment
being controlled may not be operated until the tagout device is removed.
Tagout devices, including their means of attachment, must be substantial enough to
prevent inadvertent or accidental removal. Tagout device attachments must be of a
non-reusable type, attachable by hand, self-locking, and non-releasable with a mini-
mum unlocking strength of no less than 50 pounds. They must have the general design
and basic characteristics of being at least equivalent to a one-piece, all-environment-
tolerant nylon cable tie.
Tagout devices must warn against hazardous conditions if the machine or equipment
is energized and must also include a legend such as the following:
• Do Not Start
• Do Not Open
• Do Not Close
• Do Not Energize
• Do Not Operate
12–Lockout/Tagout
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
These additional steps must be detailed in the documented tagout procedure for the
affected machine.
Often, tagout is required on older equipment. However, when this equipment is
replaced or major repair, renovation, or modification is made, the energy isolating
devices must be upgraded to accept lockout. Also, whenever new machines or equip-
ment are installed, they must accept lockout.
Training
Lockout/Tagout–13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
14–Lockout/Tagout
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
M/N
Table of Contents
M/N–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–M/N
Machine Guarding
Anchoring
Clearances
What is the minimum distance required between machines to prevent bodily harm?
OSHA does not require a minimum distance between machines. However, the agency
does say in 1910.217(f)(3), regarding mechanical power presses, that “the employer
shall provide clearance between machines so that movement of one operator will not
interfere with the work of another. Ample room for cleaning machines, handling mate-
rial, work pieces, and scrap shall also be provided.” (OSHA has similar wording in its
forging machine area standard, only adding in that the arrangement of machines shall
be such that operators will not stand in aisles, per 1910.30(b)).
Otherwise, it would seem to be a case-by-case situation that depends on factors such
as (but not limited to) the type of equipment, its application, and any additional operator
safety concerns. If having the machinery near another machine poses a hazard, OSHA
would expect measures be put in place to protect workers. The agency could potentially
use the General Duty Clause or perhaps the machine guarding regulations in Subpart
O, “Machinery and Machine Guarding,” to cite an employer.
Also, if the area is an exit access (see 1910.36(g)(2)) or if material handling equipment
has to pass through the area (see 1910.22(b)(1)) then there are specific clearances
that must be met.
Machine Guarding–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Drill Presses
2–Machine Guarding
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Machine Guarding–3
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Grinders
4–Machine Guarding
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
parts. Orange also is used to indicate “warning.” Be aware that later editions of ANSI
Z535.1 no longer contain the safety color meanings.
Painting machine guarding yellow, orange, or any color is not required but can encour-
age employees not to remove the guarding unless they are trained and authorized.
Lockout/tagout under 1910.147 may be required when maintenance is performed on
the gears under the guard.
Point of Operation
Machine Guarding–5
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Press Brakes
Securement
6–Machine Guarding
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
necessary to unfasten and remove them. Generally, guards are designed not to
obstruct the operator’s view or to prevent employees from doing a job.” [bold emphasis
added]
Training
Machine Guarding–7
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
8–Machine Guarding
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
O–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–O
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
P/Q
Table of Contents
P/Q–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–P/Q
Condition
Inspection
extinguisher will operate effectively and safely. In addition to being in its designated
place (readily accessible and immediately available), and being pressurized, the extin-
guisher should be observed for other possible defects, such as corrosion, mechanical
damage, the presence of welding, soldering, brazing, or possible tampering.
Who can perform the portable fire extinguisher “annual maintenance check” required
under 1910.157(e)(3)?
The OSHA regulation does not specify who is to conduct the check. It would be advis-
able to contact the OSHA local area office for guidance on the qualifications needed.
Also, the manufacturer’s instructions should be followed.
In addition, NFPA 10, “Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers,” (which OSHA refer-
ences in 1910 Subpart L, Appendix B) may provide useful information. This standard
provides detail about who can inspect and service equipment. It requires, among other
things, that “maintenance, servicing, and recharging shall be performed by trained and
certified persons having available the appropriate servicing manual(s)...”
In addition, it always a good idea to check with the local government fire authority for
any additional requirements.
Depending upon the classes of anticipated workplace fires, employers must provide
and distribute fire extinguishers according to the requirements outlined above. If on the
other hand, extinguishers are provided but are not intended for employee use and the
employer has an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan that meet the
requirements of 1910.38 and 1910.39 respectively, then only the requirements of para-
graphs (e) and (f) of 1910.157 apply, and fire extinguishers do not need to be made
available.
However, fire extinguishers may be required by a local or state building or fire code. As
such, employers need to contact their Fire Marshall or fire inspector for details regard-
ing any applicable requirements. An employer’s liaiblity insurance carrier may also
require that fire extinguishers be available throughout their facility.
for identification of fire protection equipment and apparatus. As such, fire extinguisher
signage or other identifiers should be red. Also, employers must comply with state and
local fire code which may dictate more specific requirements regarding markings and
labels.
Recordkeeping
• For wheeled units, condition of tires, wheels, carriage, hose, and nozzle;
• Comprehensive maintenance has been performed in the last 6 years (check
date of the last hydro/comprehensive maintenance or the date unit was
placed in service. Date is usually found on a label on the case);
• Hydrotest has been performed in the last 12 years (check date of the last
hydro or the date unit was place in service. Date is usually found stamped into
the case or on a label on the case); and
• HMIS label in place.
Also, extinguishers commonly have a tag attached to them indicating the routine
inspection history. These should be checked to verify that inspections are being done.
Training
Reserved
Portable Ladders
Fall Protection
Inspection
Portable Ladders–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Storage
Training
Use
2–Portable Ladders
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Attachments
Are safety platforms attached to the forks of a forklift considered aerial lifts?
A platform attached to the forks of a forklift would not be considered an aerial lift. OSHA
considers these to be forklifts with personnel platforms attached. While the OSHA
standard does not address using personnel platforms with forklifts, the agency does
require that employers obtain manufacturer’s prior written approval, as this is consid-
ered to be an addition/modification affecting capacity and safe operation. In addition,
fall protection and other measures must be utilized to keep those on personnel plat-
forms safe.
Battery Charging
Inspection
Licensing
Material Handling
May an operator use the blades of a fork truck to push a heavy load with the tips?
If the loads that are being bulldozed result in a hazardous condition because they are
not stable or safely arranged, there would be a violation of OSHA’s requirements at
1910.178(o)(1). This work practice is potentially hazardous for the forklift drivers and for
any pedestrians who may be in the area. The forklifts also are probably not designed
to be used in a bulldozing manner. In addition, 1910.178(l)(3)(i)(M) requires that
employees receive training on any operating instructions, warnings, or precautions
listed in the operator’s manual. If the truck’s manual has warnings against these types
of practices then this must be included in the training program content.
Modifications
Operation
where certain variables are known. This information, along with other factors, can then
be used to calculate a maximum safe speed.
Otherwise, the OSHA regulation addresses speeds in a few places, in a general man-
ner as follows:
• 1910.178(n)(1) – All traffic regulations shall be observed, including authorized
plant speed limits. A safe distance shall be maintained approximately three
truck lengths from the truck ahead, and the truck shall be kept under control
at all times.
• 1910.178(n)(4) – The driver shall be required to slow down and sound the
horn at cross aisles and other locations where vision is obstructed. If the load
being carried obstructs forward view, the driver shall be required to travel with
the load trailing.
• 1910.178(n)(7) – Grades shall be ascended or descended slowly.
• 1910.178(n)(8) – Under all travel conditions the truck shall be operated at a
speed that will permit it to be brought to a stop in a safe manner.
• 1910.178(n)(10) – The driver shall be required to slow down for wet and
slippery floors.
• 1910.178(n)(15) – While negotiating turns, speed shall be reduced to a safe
level by means of turning the hand steering wheel in a smooth, sweeping
motion. Except when maneuvering at a very low speed, the hand steering
wheel shall be turned at a moderate, even rate.
Operator Qualifications
Would a written exam alone (i.e., without practical operation of the truck) suffice for
the required 3-year operator evaluation?
The “evaluation” of “performance” required by the OSHA standard cannot be met by a
written exam alone. A written exam by itself does not indicate whether the operator is
operating the powered industrial truck safely. In most cases, the person conducting the
evaluation would do two things: first, observe the powered industrial truck operator
during normal operations to determine if the operator is performing safely, and second,
ask pertinent questions to ensure that the operator has the knowledge or experience
needed to operate a truck safely. In some cases, because of the danger or complexity
of the operation, the extent of the change in conditions, or the operator’s need for
additional skills, the evaluation will need to be lengthier and more detailed.
Seat Belts
Must powered industrial trucks be retrofitted with seatbelts if they were not manu-
factured with them?
OSHA’s current enforcement policy on the use of seat belts on forklifts is that employers
must require operators of forklifts that are equipped with operator restraint devices,
including seat belts, to use the devices. In addition, OSHA may also cite employers who
do not take advantage of a manufacturer operator restraint system or seat belt retrofit
program. This is all explained in Federal OSHA’s October 09, 1996 Seat Belt Policy
(corrected in 2007).
Trainer Qualifications
the trainer has never operated a truck with those attachments, the trainer would not
have the experience necessary to train and evaluate others adequately on the safe use
of those attachments. However, the standard does not require that the trainers operate
a PIT regularly (i.e., outside of their operator training duties) as part of their job function
or responsibility.”
If employees receive forklift training from an outside consultant, how does the
employer know they have been adequately trained?
Outside qualified training organizations can provide evidence that the employee has
successfully completed the relevant classroom and practical training. However, at
1910.178(l)(4)(i) OSHA says that each employer must ensure that each powered indus-
trial truck operator is competent to operate a truck safely, as demonstrated by the
successful completion of an evaluation of training.
In an October 01, 1999 Letter of Interpretation, OSHA says that “as long as the
employer has a reasonable basis to believe that the third-party trainer is qualified and
has a program that meets the requirements of the standard, it can rely on that trainer
to conduct the training and evaluation of employees and can certify that these employ-
ees have been trained. However...the employer may need to provide additional training
on site-specific or truck-specific matters.”
Operators must be trained on the local conditions and hazards prior to operating
powered industrial trucks in the workplace. So while the operator may be competent to
operate the equipment itself, the employer is still responsible for training on work-
related topics, as noted at 1910.178(l)(3)(ii).
Training
OSHA does, however, require an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator’s
performance at least once every three years.
Do new employees who have prior experience operating forklifts need training?
OSHA requires that employers train employees prior to operating forklifts. This training
must be worksite- and truck-specific. There is, however, a provision in the OSHA
requirements to avoid duplicate training; but there usually is still the need for some
site-specific training. In addition, OSHA requires each employer to evaluate employees
prior to allowing them to operate forklifts in their facility, regardless of whether they have
prior training with another employer.
Types
Reserved
Recordkeeping...................................................................................... 1
Audits and Inspections ....................................................................... 1
Bloodborne Pathogens....................................................................... 1
Safety Data Sheets ........................................................................... 2
Respiratory Protection ........................................................................... 1
Administration .................................................................................. 1
Breathing Air Quality.......................................................................... 1
Definitions ....................................................................................... 4
Exposure......................................................................................... 6
Filters, Cartridges, and Canisters ......................................................... 6
Fit .................................................................................................. 7
Fit Testing........................................................................................ 8
Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) ................................. 11
Maintenance and Care ..................................................................... 13
Medical Evaluations ......................................................................... 16
Program ........................................................................................ 22
Recordkeeping ............................................................................... 23
Selection ....................................................................................... 24
Training ......................................................................................... 25
Use .............................................................................................. 29
Voluntary Use ................................................................................. 32
9/13 R–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–R 9/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Recordkeeping
Bloodborne Pathogens
9/13 Recordkeeping–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
are not reported or disclosed without the express written consent of the worker, except
as required by the standard or as may be required by law.
2–Recordkeeping 9/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Respiratory Protection
Administration
What is adequate air quantity and air flow for atmosphere-supplying respirators?
Compressed air sources must have the capacity to provide an adequate supply of
breathing air. Since each airline respirator requires a minimum of 4-6 cubic feet per
minute (cfm) air, compressed air sources should be sized to provide at least this
amount of air for each respirator at the operating pressure specified for the particular
respirator(s) in use. Proper air flow can then be verified by monitoring airline pressure.
The NIOSH respirator certification process establishes the proper air pressure required
for each particular respirator and airline combination. If the air pressure is within the
proper range, the air flow should also be correct. For this reason, an air pressure gauge
should be installed at the point where the airlines are connected to the air supply
manifold.
When may oxygen in greater concentrations than 23.5 % be used in supplied air
systems?
To avoid the potential for fire and explosions, oxygen in greater concentration than
23.5% may only be used with equipment designed specifically for oxygen service or
distribution.
Are there any restrictions on the placement of compressors supplying breathing air?
Yes. The location of the compressor intake is critical to the purity of air supplied to the
respirator user. The compressor must be located in an area uncontaminated by either
combustion exhaust gases produced by vehicles or the compressor motor itself (if
applicable), or by other gases from plant processes.
What does “suitable” mean with regard to compressors equipped with in-line air-
purifying beds and filters?
The term “suitable” means that the compressor is capable of delivering a continuous
supply of Grade D breathing air. On some compressors, especially those that are
oil-lubricated, in-line sorbent beds and filters will need to be installed and maintained to
ensure Grade D air. To further ensure breathing air quality, the air-purifying sorbent
beds and filters must be changed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Other
compressors, such as some ambient air movers, may be capable of delivering Grade
D air without the addition of sorbent beds and filters.
Do all air compressors used to supply breathing air have to have a carbon monoxide
alarm?
A compressor that is not oil-lubricated is not required to have an alarm. However, an
employer must ensure that carbon monoxide levels in the breathing air do not exceed
10 ppm. Methods for ensuring that the carbon monoxide level does not exceed 10 ppm
include the placement of the air intake for the compressor in an area known to be free
from contaminants, frequent or continuous monitoring of the breathing air supply, the
use of carbon monoxide filters, or the use of high temperature alarms or shut off
devices where necessary.
For an oil lubricated air compressor, carbon monoxide can be produced where oil
enters into the compression chamber and is partially combusted. Carbon monoxide can
also enter the air intake for the compressor if the intake is not properly located. This
type of compressor must have either a carbon monoxide alarm, high temperature
alarm, or both. If only a high temperature alarm is used then the breathing air must be
tested for the presence of carbon monoxide at intervals sufficient to ensure that carbon
monoxide levels do not exceed 10 ppm.
May the carbon monoxide filters with color-change indicators which convert carbon
monoxide to carbon dioxide be used to detect the presence of carbon monoxide in
breathing air?
No, the color change in the indicator is a warning of the presence of moisture in the
breathing air that is trapped in the filter. Moisture can render the filter ineffective. Thus,
the color-change indicator cannot be used to detect the presence of carbon monoxide.
How often should the breathing air supplied by a compressor be tested for the
presence of carbon monoxide?
The frequency of monitoring will depend on the breathing air system in place, adher-
ence to required maintenance procedures, and the location of the air intake for the
compressor. For example, keeping in mind that a given measurement represents only
that instant in time and must be representative of long-term air quality, periodic moni-
toring may be appropriate in situations where the compressor is well maintained and
the air intake for the compressor is located in an area free from contaminants. In
contrast, continuous monitoring would be warranted for older compressors where oil
blow-by is more likely due to piston ring and cylinder wear, or in situations where rental
compressors are used and/or the maintenance history is not known.
May the same air line couplings be used on both breathing air lines and worksite
airlines used to pneumatically power other industrial equipment?
No, all couplings for breathing air must be incompatible with couplings and outlets for
non-respirable compressed air and other gases used at your workplace. This provision
is intended to prevent the cross-contamination and introduction of hazardous contami-
nants into breathing air lines.
May nitrogen be used to purge or blow out the breathing air lines?
No. To prevent the contamination of breathing air lines with a non-respirable gas, the
standard specifically prohibits the introduction of an asphyxiating substance such as
nitrogen into breathing air lines under any circumstances.
Definitions
What is a respirator?
A respirator is a protective facepiece, hood, or helmet that is designed to protect that
wearer against a variety of harmful airborne agents.
Exposure
Can end of service life indicators (ESLI) be used under all workplace conditions?
ESLIs are NIOSH certified for only a few contaminants. NIOSH tests them under most
conditions of use. Cartridges and canisters equipped with ESLIs can be used only if
they are appropriate for the conditions of the employer’s workplace. An example of a
workplace condition that may adversely affect an ESLI is where a cartridge equipped
with a moisture dependent ESLI is used in an extremely dry atmosphere.
Why must the NIOSH label on filters not be removed, obscured, or defaced while in
service?
The NIOSH label serves several purposes. It ensures selection of appropriate filters for
the contaminants encountered in the workplace and permits the employee using the
respirator to check and confirm that the respirator has the appropriate filters before the
respirator is used. Color coding and labeling allow fellow employees, supervisors, and
the respirator program administrator to readily determine that the employee is using the
appropriate filters.
An employer may adopt whatever procedures are appropriate to ensure that the label
remains on the filter and is not removed, defaced, or obscured during respirator usage.
Fit
What can be done if an employee has a very small face and has trouble being fit
tested for a respirator?
Manufactures make several different sizes. Respirators may also vary in size from
manufacturer to manufacturer. Users may be able to get a better fit by trying a respi-
rator made by another manufacturer. In some cases, the use of powered air–purifying
respirators may be appropriate. Employers must help find a suitable respirator.
Fit Testing
Do all tight-fitting respirators which are required by the employer or by OSHA have
to be fit tested?
Yes. Both negative pressure and positive pressure tight-fitting respirators must be fit
tested.
Do tight-fitting negative pressure respirators that are worn voluntarily require a fit
test?
No, respirators worn when not required by OSHA or the employer do not require a fit
test.
Can QLFT be used to test the fit of a full facepiece negative pressure air purifying
respirator?
The factor that limits the use of QLFT is the concentration of the air contaminant in
which it is being worn. If the full facepiece respirator is only being worn in air contami-
nant concentrations that are equal to or less than ten times the PEL, then QLFT can be
used. However, it cannot be used in air concentrations greater than ten times the PEL
unless it is fit tested using a quantitative fit test (QNFT).
What are acceptable fit factors for tight-fitting half facepieces and tight-fitting full
facepieces respirators that are fit tested using QNFT?
The acceptable fit factors are 100 for a half facepiece and 500 for a full facepiece as
prescribed in paragraph (f)(7) of the standard.
Is fit testing required of positive pressure respirators such as SCBAs, powered air
purifying respirators (PAPRs), and supplied air respirators (SARs) ?
Yes. The standard requires fit testing of the facepiece to check for leakage. The stan-
dard allows the employer to conduct the test by using a negative pressure respirator
with a facepiece of the same make, model, and size as the positive pressure facepiece,
or by temporarily converting the facepiece for the positive pressure apparatus to a
negative pressure device and performing the fit test.
Can a tight-fitting PAPR be tested simply by not turning the fan motor on?
Yes. By not turning on the fan motor, a PAPR would be operating in the negative
pressure mode.
Is there a frequency of use below which fit testing would not be required for atmo-
sphere supplying respirators?
The standard’s requirement of annual fit testing applies to emergency response per-
sonnel who wear respirators to protect against hazardous atmospheres. Proper fit is
especially necessary for emergency personnel. These people may only wear the equip-
ment infrequently, but when they do use the equipment, they often use it in very
dangerous atmospheres.
Can a probe hole be drilled in a facepiece to perform QNFT and then the probe hole
be sealed so the facepiece can be used on the respirator?
No. The permanently probed respirator only serves as a surrogate for testing purposes.
A face piece with a probe hole drilled in it cannot be restored to its NIOSH-approved
configuration.
What is IDLH?
OSHA considers an atmosphere to be IDLH when it poses an immediate threat to life,
could cause irreversible adverse health effects, or could impair an employee’s ability to
escape.
For all IDLH entry, how many employees must be located outside an IDLH atmo-
sphere.
Environments containing IDLH atmospheres are frequently well-enough understood
and controlled that a single standby person is adequate. In most fixed workplaces, the
atmosphere is known (i.e., has been well defined either through analysis of monitoring
results or through a process hazard analysis). In many industrial IDLH situations, only
one respirator user is exposed to the IDLH atmosphere at a time, which means that a
single standby person can easily monitor that employee’s status (when needed, the
standard requires more than one employee outside).
Even in situations where more than one respirator user is inside an IDLH atmosphere,
a single standby person can often provide adequate communication and support. For
example, in a small pump room or shed, even though two or three employees may be
inside an IDLH atmosphere performing routine maintenance activities such as chang-
ing pump seals, one standby person can observe and communicate with all of them. In
this type of situation, one standby person is adequate and appropriate, as long as the
employee(s) outside is able to perform an effective rescue.
However, there are instances where more than one standby person is needed. For
example, to clean and paint the interior of a multi-level, multi-portal water tower — a
process that often generates a deadly atmosphere as a result of cleaning solution and
paint solvent vapors — employees often enter the tower through different portals to
work on different levels. In such a situation, there would be a need for good commu-
nications at each entry portal, and more than one standby person would be needed to
maintain adequate communication and accessibility.
What does OSHA require in the situation where the standby person must enter an
IDLH atmosphere to provide emergency rescue?
The employer has flexibility in determining who will respond to such emergency rescue
situations. The employer or authorized designee must be notified before the standby
personnel undertake rescue activity and the employer or designee must then provide
appropriate assistance for the particular situation. The employer must ensure that
before entering an IDLH environment to provide emergency rescue, standby personnel
notifies the employer or the employer’s designee who has been authorized by the
employer to provide necessary assistance that they are about to enter.
As part of the written respirator program’s worksite-specific procedures, the procedures
that standby personnel will follow and whom they specifically need to notify in rescue
situations must be specified. The employer’s emergency response team may provide
the necessary support, or other arrangements may have been made with local
firefighting and emergency rescue personnel.
Must the standby person(s) wait for a backup before beginning rescue operations?
Normally, standby personnel must contact the employer or employer’s designee before
undertaking any rescue activities in an IDLH atmosphere. The employer or authorized
designee must take responsibility for ensuring that rescue operations are carried out
appropriately, that rescuers are provided with proper respiratory equipment, and that
employees are prepared to facilitate rescue attempts through proper preparation. How-
ever, the notification provision does not require standby employees to delay entry as
they attempt to contact the employer or wait indefinitely for their employer or designee
to respond to notification before entering the IDLH atmosphere when employees inside
are in danger of succumbing and standby personnel are appropriately trained and
equipped to provide assistance.
In the majority of cases, however, rescuers should not enter the IDLH environment until
receiving some response to the notification that rescue is necessary (i.e., the employer
or designee should know that the rescuers are entering, and emergency response units
should be on their way to the incident).
Once the employer or designee has been notified the employer or designee who is
authorized to do so must provide the necessary assistance appropriate to the situation.
Such assistance does not always require that additional standby personnel enter the
hazardous atmosphere. In some cases, the appropriate assistance could be, for
example, the provision of emergency medical treatment. If standby employees do need
to enter the hazardous environment to perform rescue operations, however, the
employer must ensure that those rescuers are fully protected.
Must an employer provide company time to employees to clean and maintain the
respirators assigned for use?
An employer is allowed to choose the cleaning and disinfecting program the best meets
the requirements of the standard and the particular circumstances of the workplace. It
is OSHA policy that if the employer elects to have employees clean their own respira-
tors, the employer must provide the cleaning and disinfecting equipment, supplies, and
facilities, as well as time for the job to be done. Failure to do so would be a violation of
paragraph (h)(1) of the standard.
If a respirator is used by more than one person, how often must it be cleaned and
disinfected?
Disposable respirators cannot be disinfected; therefore, can only be assigned to one
person. Disposable respirators must be discarded if they are soiled, physically dam-
aged, or reach the end of their service life. Replaceable filter respirators may be
shared, but must be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected after each use before being
worn by a different person using the procedures in Appendix B–2 of the standard or
equally effective procedures recommended by the manufacturer.
Can alcohol wipes be used to clean the inside of the face pieces of respirators?
Yes, if permitted by the manufacturer of the respirator. Appendix B-2 of the standard
has guidance on appropriate respirator cleaning and disinfecting procedures.
How can an employer ensure that respirators that fail an inspection or found to be
defective are removed from service and not used?
An employer could use a tag system where a tag stating “out of service” is placed on
the respirator to help ensure that a defective respirator is not inadvertently used.
Medical Evaluations
Are seasonal or temporary workers exempt from the requirement for medical evalu-
ations?
No. The frequency and duration of respirator use and the worker’s term of employment,
does not affect the requirement for medical evaluation.
Can a fit test for a respirator be performed before the initial medical evaluation has
been completed?
No. The initial medical evaluation must be conducted prior to fit testing to identify
individuals whose health may be harmed by the limited amount of respirator use asso-
ciated with fit testing.
Are employees who are voluntarily using dust masks (e.g., for employee comfort)
required to have medical evaluations?
No. If an employer has determined that there is no hazard, and dust mask use is
voluntary, then no medical evaluation is required.
Be aware that if an employer allows voluntary use of this type of respirator, then they
must provide the employee with the information contained in Appendix D of the stan-
dard and ensure that such respirator use will not itself create a hazard.
Are medical evaluations required for positive pressure, as well as negative pressure,
respirators?
Yes. Clinical studies show that positive pressure respirator use can harm the employee.
Are physicians the only medical professionals allowed to perform medical evalua-
tions for respirator use?
No. A variety of health care professionals may do this depending on the scope of
practice permitted by the state’s licensing, registration, or certification agencies. Each
employer must check with the state licensing agency to see if other health care pro-
fessionals under their state law can independently perform this evaluation, or must do
so under the direction of a licensed physician.
Can an employer choose to let each employee use their own personal physician to
provide a medical evaluation rather than using the employer’s PLHCP?
Yes. This may be a workable system where few employees are involved. The employer
will have to contact each of these PLHCPs and provide them with a copy of the
Respiratory Protection Standard and other required supplemental information, as well
as updates when required. The employer must bear the costs of the evaluation. It is not
acceptable for an employee to use their health insurance for this purpose, unless the
employer pays 100% of the insurance premiums.
Can a nurse who does not meet the qualifications of a PLHCP assess a question-
naire?
A nurse not otherwise qualified to be the PLHCP can perform some tasks, such as
distributing the questionnaire, respond to some questions (e.g., providing advice to
employees on where they can obtain assistance in understanding or reading the ques-
tions), and gathering the completed forms in preparation for delivery to the PLHCP. If
the nurse is working under the direction of a physician (or other PLHCP consistent with
state law) who will perform the final review of the assessment, then this arrangement
is acceptable.
Does the employer have to use the exact language of the questionnaire in Appendix
C if they choose to evaluate by medical questionnaire?
The language of Part A in Appendix C is mandatory if the employer chooses to medi-
cally evaluate by questionnaire. The employer may choose a medical examination in
lieu of the medical questionnaire.
Does the PLHCP have to visit the worksite to perform a medical evaluation?
While it might be helpful for the PLHCP to visit the site, there is no requirement to do
so under the standard. The supplemental information required to be provided to the
PLHCP by the standard is sufficient for that individual to make a valid recommendation
on the employee’s ability to wear a respirator.
How does an employer ensure the employee understands the questions on the medi-
cal questionnaire if the employee only speaks and/or reads a language other than
English?
Under these circumstances, the PLHCP can assist the employee in filling out the
questionnaire, with the aid of an employer-provided interpreter. The interpreter need
not be a professional and can be a bilingual employee, family member, or friend who
is fluent in the native language of the person answering the questionnaire. The
employer may also have the questionnaire translated into the appropriate language.
How can an employer ensure the employee understands the medical questionnaire
while still meeting the requirements of confidentiality?
Since the medical questionnaire provided in the standard was designed to be easily
understood, oversight should not generally be necessary. When employees have ques-
tions about the questionnaire, they must be provided with the opportunity to discuss the
questions with the PLHCP.
Why do employees have to answer questions about hearing and vision impairments?
Questions 10 through 15 of Appendix C must only be answered by those who will use
full facepiece or SCBA respirators. The configuration of these respirators can further
reduce hearing and vision. If an employee answers ’yes’ to any of the items in these
questions, a medical exam is required.
Who determines the scope and form of the medical evaluation if an employee gives
a positive response to questions 1 through 8 in Section 2, Part A of the question-
naire?
The PLHCP makes this determination, and is also expected to refer the employee to a
physician if warranted.
If an employer chooses to provide physical exams, rather than use the questionnaire,
what information must be obtained?
An employer who chooses to skip the questionnaire, and instead go directly to an exam
must ensure that the exam obtains the same information as is found in the question-
naire.
Who pays for the medical evaluation and any subsequent exams?
The employer must pay for the medical evaluation and any related expenses incurred
by the employee during the evaluation, including travel costs.
If the PLHCP discovers that the employee uses drugs, does the PLHCP have an
obligation to tell the employer?
No. The PLHCP must maintain strict confidentiality on specific medical findings unre-
lated to the ability to wear a respirator. Information regarding pregnancy, genetic
susceptibility, mental health problems, and drug use are not to be revealed to the
employer when they result from the medical evaluation process. These findings must
remain confidential. How specific medical information is addressed between the
employee and PLHCP should be determined by the legal, professional, and ethical
standards that govern the PLHCP’s practice.
Why is there no specific requirement to give the PLHCP a list of substances the
employee may be exposed to?
The company’s written respiratory program must specify the exposure conditions that
require the use of a respirator. A copy of the written program must be provided to the
PLHCP. The program will provide the necessary information to the PLHCP without
imposing an additional paperwork burden on employers.
Program
Does an employer with multiple worksites have the flexibility to develop a generic
written program that would be applicable to all facilities?
Yes. The employer may have different sites with very similar operations, where a
generic or single corporate program could be used. It must, however, include site-
specific provisions to reflect different site conditions.
Recordkeeping
How can the employee obtain a copy of their medical evaluation or the medical
questionnaire?
The employer is required to provide a copy of the written opinion to the employee. The
written opinion should be provided by the PLHCP but can be provided by the employer.
Requests for copies of the questionnaire should be made to the PLHCP consistent with
the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1020, “Access to Employee Exposure and Medical
Records.”
Must the tags that contain the signature of the person authorized to change the inline
sorbent beds and filters on compressors be kept for a specified period of time?
No, only the tag containing the most recent change must be kept at the compressor.
Selection
How can an employer determine if the mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD)
of a contaminant is less than 2 micrometers?
Ranges of MMAD for various processes have been reported in published articles. It
also is possible to determine ranges through testing. If the MMAD cannot be deter-
mined, a HEPA filter, or a filter certified for particulates by NIOSH under 42 CFR part
84 (N95 or higher) must be selected.
Can any supplied air respirator be used for entry into IDLH atmospheres?
No. Paragraph (d)(2)(i) requires a full facepiece pressure-demand SCBA certified by
NIOSH for a minimum service life of thirty minutes or a combination full facepiece
pressure-demand supplied-air respirator with auxiliary self-contained air supply.
Are N95 filters allowed for contaminants with permissible exposure limits below 0.05
mg/m?
Yes, if oil aerosols are not present, and there are no applicable OSHA standards
requiring the use of HEPA filters. If filters are chosen from among those certified under
30 CFR Part 11, which carry the designation TC 21C-xxxx, only HEPA filters can be
used.
Does an employer have to provide a PAPR to an employee who can’t wear a negative
pressure respirator?
An employer must provide a PAPR if the PLHCP determines that the use of a negative
pressure respirator would place the employee at increased risk for adverse health
effects, and the PLHCP finds that the employee can use a PAPR. If a subsequent
medical evaluation finds that the employee is able to use a negative pressure respi-
rator, a PAPR need no longer be provided.
Training
What information must be covered regarding the limitations and the capabilities of
the respirator?
The limitations and capabilities of the respirator would cover how the respirator oper-
ates. This includes an explanation of how the respirator provides protection by filtering
the air, absorbing the vapor, or providing clean air from an uncontaminated source.
Where appropriate, it should also include limitations on the equipment such as prohi-
bitions against using air-purifying respirators in case of an emergency in IDLH
atmosphere, and an explanation of why they should not be used in such situations.
What must employees know about how to inspect and check respirators?
This would include the steps that employees are to follow if they discover any problems
during the inspection (i.e., to whom they should report problems and where they can
obtain replacement equipment if necessary). If an employer routinely has extensive
inspections done by separate personnel. then the standard does not require that indi-
vidual respirator wearers be trained how to do full inspections. Training the employees
in only those parts of the inspection process that they are expected to do is sufficient.
The training must also include the procedures for donning and removing the respirator,
checking the fit and seals, and using the respirator.
Employees must be trained in how to check the respirator seal. Employers must train
employees in the methods set forth in Appendix B or in alternative methods that are
equally effective.
How extensively must the employees be trained about the maintenance and storage
of respirators?
Where employees perform some or all respirator maintenance and store respirators
while not in use, detailed training in maintenance and storage procedures may be
necessary. In other facilities, where specific personnel or central repair facilities are
assigned to perform these activities, most employees may need only to be informed of
the maintenance and storage procedures without having to learn significant technical
information.
How extensive must the employer train employees on the general requirements of
the standard?
The discussion does not need to focus on all the details of the standard but could, for
example, simply inform employees that employers are obligated to develop a written
program, properly select respirators; evaluate respirator use; correct deficiencies in
respirator use; conduct medical evaluations; provide for the maintenance, storage, and
cleaning of respirators; and retain and provide access to specific records.
How does an employer ensure that training is conducted in a manner that is under-
standable to employees?
Employers are to develop training programs suitable to the employee’s educational
level and language background.
Do employees who are emergency responders need training more than once a year?
An employer must assure that an employee can demonstrate knowledge of the ele-
ments specified in (k)(1)(i) through (vii) of the standard. Employees who can not
demonstrate such knowledge must receive additional training even if they have
received training within the last 12 months.
How often is the employer required to provide information to employees who volun-
tarily use respirators?
The standard requires that an employer initially provide the basic advisory information
in Appendix D to employees who voluntarily use respirators that are not required by
OSHA standards or the employer. Appendix D may be used, or alternatively, the
employer may develop material that is equivalent in content to this appendix. This
information may be transmitted either in written form or verbally. This information is not
required to be provided other than initially.
Use
What can be done if employees find it difficult to talk with coworkers when wearing
a respirator?
Some respirators may interfere with speech more than others. In these instances,
devices that enhance speech communication are available.
The user seal check cannot be performed on some tight-fitting respirators by employ-
ees with small hands who cannot block off the valves. Some manufacturers make a fit
check cup that can be used to perform a user seal check with filtering facepiece
respirators.
OSHA does not permit the use of respirators that cannot be seal checked. If no method
exists to check whether a respirator re-seals during multiple re-donnings under actual
workplace conditions, OSHA does not consider the respirator acceptable for use.
When employees must leave the respirator use area where are they supposed to go?
Employers must ensure that employees are allowed to leave the respirator use area in
several circumstances. The intent of this requirement is to ensure that employees leave
the area where respiratory protection is necessary when they need to remove the
respirator or where it appears that the respirator is not functioning properly. In these
circumstances, the standard requires employees to leave the “respirator use” area.
This does not, however, always equate with the work area or workplace. This is
intended to give employers the flexibility to establish safe areas in their workplaces that
will minimize interruptions in work flow and production while ensuring that the area
where respirators are removed is free of respiratory hazards or contamination.
Voluntary Use
If an employer has determined that no hazard exists, but an employee asks the
employer for a respirator because a “smell” is bothersome, would this be considered
“voluntary use?”
Yes, this is voluntary use.
Does an employer have to pay for any of the expenses associated with the voluntary
use of respirators?
The voluntary use of an elastomeric mask requires that the employer have a written 10
program, ensure the employee is medically able to use the respirator and that the
respirator does not present a health hazard, and provide a copy of Appendix D to the
employee. To the extent that the above items may create an expense, these costs
would be covered by the employer. The employer can choose to supply the respirator
and cartridges at no cost to the employee. If the employee supplies their own respirator,
the cost of the respirator and cartridges would be the responsibility of the employee.
For voluntary users wearing dust masks, the employer must provide at no cost to the
employee, a copy of Appendix D. Where respiratory protection is required either by the
employer or by the OSHA, the employer must pay all costs associated with the require-
ments set forth in the standard.
3/13 S–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–S 3/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Scissor Lifts
Definitions
Fall Protection
Training
• Loading,
• Clearances and other precautions,
• Entanglement,
• Electrical hazards
• Driving,
• Travel speeds,
• Personal protective equipment,
• Safety measures while working on the platform,
• Fueling,
• Battery charging,
• Modifications,
• Worksite and work area hazards, and
• Reporting malfunctions, and hazards
If used for construction work, employers must comply with 1926.454, “Training require-
ments” as OSHA considers a scissor lift as scaffold as referenced in a February 23,
2000 and August 1, 2000 LOIs.
Reserved
Spray Booths
Clearance
Lighting
Maintenance
Storage
Use
Reserved
Stairs
Handrails
Platforms
If you have a set of stairs that consists of three actual steps and then a platform, are
handrails and midrails required?
OSHA defines a platform as “an extended step...” In addition, the definition of a stairs/
stairway is “a series of steps and landings having three or more risers.” In this case, the
number of steps plus the platform would require a handrail and possibly a midrail (that
depends on the width of the stairway) under 1910.23(d).
Stairs–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Tread
2–Stairs
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Storage Racks
Anchoring
Condition
Storage Racks–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
damaged from forklift traffic, significantly compromising the structural integrity of the
system. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct these haz-
ards include:
1. Complying with the requirements outlined in the American National Standards
Institute, ANSI MH16.1, “Specification for the Design, Testing, and Utilization
of Industrial Steel Storage Racks.”
2. To repair or replace all damaged metal storage racks as per manufacturer’’s
specifications.
3. To develop a maintenance program designed to recognize weakness in the
rack system in order to prevent a structural collapse.” [bold emphasis added]
Inspections
2–Storage Racks
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Installation
Storage Racks–3
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
harm to employees in that employees were exposed to...crushing hazards from not
anchoring the storage rack systems. The storage racks are used to store various gauge
metal sheets, parts and products. The storage racks systems range in height from 4 to
6 tiers. In addition, load capacity rating plaques were not in place to state the storage
capacity of the systems. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abate-
ment method to correct this hazard is to anchor the storage racks systems and install
load capacity plaques in accordance with ANSI MH 16.1, “Specification for the
Design, Testing, and Utilization of Industrial Steel Storage Racks.”” [bold emphasis
added]
And, in a 12/23/2005 General Duty Clause citation, OSHA said:
“…employees were exposed to crushing injuries from the failure of steel racks ... the
employer did not have the home-made racking systems conform with the requirements
of ANSI MH 16.1-1974. The rated load capacities of the storage racks were
unknown and the load capacities were not marked on the storage racks. Among
other methods, one feasible and acceptable means of abatement, is to determine the
capacity of the storage racks and have the design of the racks certified by a profes-
sional engineer…” [bold emphasis added]
Also note that local building/safety codes may have specific requirements for load
rating postings.
4–Storage Racks
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
T/U/V
Table of Contents
Training................................................................................................ 1
Recordkeeping ................................................................................. 1
Refresher Training ............................................................................ 1
Required Training ............................................................................. 2
Trainer Qualifications ....................................................................... 25
9/12 T/U/V–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–T/U/V 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Training
Recordkeeping
Refresher Training
9/12 Training–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Required Training
2–Training 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Training–3
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
❍ repeat annually
❍ repeat annually
❍ repeat annually
4–Training 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Training–5
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
❍ when there are deviations from the permit space entry proce-
dures
❍ when the employee’s knowledge of entry procedures are inad-
equate
What records: • Entry supervisors must fill out and sign an entry permit
• Keep canceled entry permits at least one year
• Keep training certificates that include:
❍ employee’s name
❍ date of training
Lockout/Tagout (1910.147)
Who: Train employees:
• Who perform service or maintenance on equipment that must be
locked out or tagged
• Who operate equipment that is locked out (affected employees)
When: • Initially, or prior to performing service or maintenance on equip-
ment or a system
• As needed for employee proficiency
• When there are new or revised procedures
What records: Keep a training certificate that includes:
• Employee’s name
• Date of training
6–Training 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/12 Training–7
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
8–Training 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
❍ periodically thereafter
What records: • Training certificate required for operators of part revolution power
presses used in the PSDI mode that includes:
❍ name of the employee
9/12 Training–9
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
10–Training 9/12
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Sawmills (1910.265)
Who: Train employees exposed to sawmill operations, excluding those
involving the manufacture of plywood, cooperage, and veneer
• Industry consensus standards and applicable OSHA regulations
may have additional training requirements
When: Initially, or prior to assignment
• Industry consensus standards and applicable OSHA regulations
may require refresher training
What records: No specific training documentation is required
• Industry consensus standards and applicable OSHA regulations
may require documentation
❍ date of training
❍ signature of trainer
❍ signature of employer
Telecommunications (1910.268)
Who: Train employees exposed to hazards involving telecommunication
work
When: Prior to participating in telecommunications activities
What records: • A written description of the training program
• Document employee training
• Retain training certification record for each employee during the
period of employment
9/14 Training–11
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
12–Training 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/14 Training–13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Asbestos (1910.1001)*
Who: Train employees who are exposed to airborne concentrations of
asbestos at or above the action level
When: • Initially, or prior to assignment
• At least annually thereafter
What records: • Document employee training
• Keep training certification record for one year beyond the
employee’s last day of employment
14–Training 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
operations
• Train employees who clean or launder contaminated protective
clothing
When: • Initially
• At least annually thereafter
• Within five working days after receiving exposure results, notify
each employee in writing of those results
What records: • Provide specific information to physicians who conduct medical
surveillance
• Provide each employee with a copy of the physician’s written
opinion
• Provide all materials relating to the employee information and
training program to OSHA and NIOSH
• Provide a copy of 1910.1018 and its appendices to covered
employees
• Retain exposure monitoring and medical surveillance records
for at least 40 years or the duration of employment plus 20
years, whichever is longer
9/14 Training–15
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Lead (1910.1025)*
Who: Train employees:
• With potential exposure to airborne lead
• Exposed to airborne lead at or above the action level
• Who are at risk of skin or eye irritation
• Who use respirators according to 1910.134
• Who clean or launder contaminated protective clothing
When: • Initially, or prior to assignment
• At least annually thereafter
• Within five working days after receiving exposure results, notify
each employee in writing of his or her exposure level
What records: • Provide specific information to physicians who conduct medical
examinations
• Provide each employee with a copy of the physician’s written
opinion
• Provide all materials relating to the employee information and
training program to OSHA and NIOSH upon request
• Provide a copy of §1910.1025 and its appendices to covered
employees
• Retain exposure monitoring and medical surveillance records
for at least 40 years or the duration of employment plus 20
years, whichever is longer
16–Training 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Cadmium (1910.1027)*
Who: Train employees:
• With potential exposure to cadmium
• Who use respirators according to 1910.134
• With exposure to hazardous substances according to
1910.1200
• Who clean or launder contaminated protective clothing about
exposure hazards
When: • Initially, or prior to assignment
• At least annually thereafter
• Within 15 working days after receiving exposure results, notify
each employee in writing of his or her exposure level and post
the results
• Within 30 days of an employee request, provide the information
that was given to the physician
• Within two weeks of receipt, provide each employee with a copy
of the physician’s written opinion
What records: • Provide specific information to physicians who conduct medical
examinations
• Provide all materials relating to the employee information and
training program to OSHA upon request
• Make a copy of 1910.1027 and its appendices available to
affected employees
• Retain exposure monitoring for at least 30 years, and retain
medical surveillance records for at least the duration of
employment plus 30 years
Benzene (1910.1028)*
Who: Train employees who are exposed to airborne concentrations of
benzene at or above the action level.
When: • Initially, or prior to assignment
• At least annually thereafter
What records: No specific training documentation is required
9/14 Training–17
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
18–Training 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/14 Training–19
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (1910.1044)*
Who: Train employees:
• Who are occupationally exposed to 1,2-dibromo-3-
chloropropane (DBCP)
• Who use respirators according to 1910.134
• Who clean or launder contaminated protective clothing about
exposure hazards
When: • Annually inform employees of the information in Appendix A of
1910.1044
• Within five working days after receiving monitoring results, notify
each employee in writing of his or her exposure level
What records: • Provide specific information to physicians who conduct medical
examinations
• Provide each employee with a copy of the physician’s written
opinion
• Maintain a record of the training program contents
• Provide all materials relating to the employee information and
training program to OSHA and NIOSH upon request
• Make a copy of 1910.1044 and its appendices available to
affected employees
• Retain exposure monitoring and medical surveillance records
for the duration of employment plus 30 years
20–Training 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Acrylonitrile (1910.1045)*
Who: Train employees:
• Who are occupationally exposed to acrylonitrile (AN)
• Who use personal protective equipment according to 1910.132
• Who use respirators according to 1910.134
• Who clean or launder contaminated protective clothing of the
hazards of exposure
When: • At the time of initial assignment
• At least annually thereafter
• Within five working days after receiving monitoring results, notify
each employee in writing of his or her exposure level
What records: • Provide specific information to physicians who conduct medical
examinations
• Provide each employee with a copy of the physician’s written
opinion
• Maintain a record of the training program contents, including a
certificate under 1910.132
• Provide all materials relating to the employee information and
training program to OSHA and NIOSH upon request
• Make a copy of 1910.1045 and its appendices available to
affected employees
• Retain exposure monitoring and medical surveillance records
for the duration of employment plus 30 years
9/14 Training–21
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
22–Training 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Formaldehyde (1910.1048)*
Who: Train employees:
• Assigned to workplaces with exposure to formaldehyde at or
above 0.1 ppm
• Who use personal protective equipment according to 1910.132
• Who use respirators according to 1910.134
• Who clean or launder contaminated protective clothing about
exposure hazards
When: • At the time of initial assignment
• At least annual thereafter
• Whenever a new exposure to formaldehyde is introduced
• Within 15 days of receipt, provide each employee with a copy of
the physician’s written opinion
• Within 15 working days after receiving monitoring results, notify
each employee of his or her exposure level either individually in
writing or by posting the results
What records: • Provide specific information to physicians who conduct medical
examinations
• Maintain a record of the training program contents, including
records under 1910.132 and 1910.134
• Provide all materials relating to the program to employees and
to OSHA upon request
• Retain exposure monitoring and medical surveillance records
for the duration of employment plus 30 years
9/14 Training–23
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Methylenedianiline (1910.1050)*
Who: Train employees:
• Who may be exposed to airborne Methylenedianiline (MDA) at
or above its action level or where dermal exposure to MDA can
occur
• Who use personal protective equipment according to 1910.132
• Who use respirators according to 1910.134
• In emergency action procedures according to 1910.38
• Who clean or launder contaminated protective clothing about
exposure hazards
When: • At the time of initial assignment
• At least annually thereafter
• Within 15 working days after receiving monitoring results, notify
each employee of his or her exposure level either individually in
writing or by posting the results.
• Within 15 days of receipt, provide each employee with a copy of
the physician’s written opinion
What records: • Maintain a record of the training program contents
• Provide specific information physicians who conduct medical
surveillance
• Provide all materials relating to the program to employees and
to OSHA and NIOSH upon request
• Make a copy of 1910.1050 and its appendices available to
employees.
• Retain exposure monitoring and medical surveillance records
for the duration of employment plus 30 years
24–Training 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
9/14 Training–25
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Trainer Qualifications
26–Training 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
W/X/Y/Z–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–W/X/Y/Z
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
REFERENCE
Table of Contents
Reference–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
2–Reference
1972/05/15
Standard Number: 1910.22(b)
May 15, 1972
REPLY TO ATTN OF: OSHA/ARAC
SUBJECT: Compliance with Aisle Markings (Part 1910.22(b))
TO: All Area Directors
As a result of numerous calls regarding the marking and widths of aisles in industrial
operations, the following are considered to comply with the requirements:
The lines used to delineate the aisles may be any color so long as they clearly define
the area considered as aisle space. The lines may be composed of dots, square, strip
or continuous, but they too must define the aisle area.
The recommended width of aisle markings varies from 2 inches to 6 inches; therefore,
any width 2 inches or more is considered acceptable.
The recommended width of aisles is at least 3 feet wider than the largest equipment to
be utilized, or a minimum of 4 feet.
R. A. Wendell
Assistant Regional Administrator
for Compliance
[Corrected April 17, 2009]
1972/09/14
Standard Number: 1910.37; 1910.37(b)(6)
September 14, 1972
Mr. H. W. Somershoe
Executive Vice President
DAP Inc.
P.O. Box 277
Dayton, Ohio 45401
Dear Mr. Somershoe:
In regard to your letter of September 7, 1972, exit markings in places of employment are
covered under [29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6)] of the OSHA Standards (Federal Register, May 29,
1971 [Revised November 7, 2002 67 FR 67949-67965]). [Subparagraph (b)] in the discus-
sion of exit sign marking and distinctive lighting for exits have no prohibition against the
color red. Any color, or color combinations, that is readily visible or distinctive in appearance
on exit signs is acceptable to OSHA. It is possible that local building codes may requires a
certain color, but our standards do not.
We trust that this information will be of assistance to you.
Sincerely,
PATRICK J. HOMMY
CSHO, Standards
[Corrected 2/6/2004]
1975/07/17
Standard Number: 1910.67
July 17 1975
Mr. Robert E. Schumacher
General Manager
High Plains Insurance, Inc.
P.O. Box 100
Hays, Kansas 67601
Dear Mr. Schumacher:
This is in response to your letter of May 21, 1975, regarding aerial ladders or booms.
Enclosed is a copy of 29 CFR 1910.67, Vehicle-Mounted Elevating and Rotating Work
Platforms amendment, that was published in the Federal Register of March 6, 1975. This
amendment gives you the answer to your questions.
There is nothing in the wording of 1910.67 that requires the employer to certify and des-
ignate an operator to another party. Employers have the responsibility of devising methods
to train their operators in the safe operation of aerial lifts. Only competent and careful
operators should be assigned these duties. The operator shall be trained in safe operations
and made familiar with the manufacturer’s manual, especially those parts which relate to
operation, maintenance, and safety of aerial devices.
If I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Janet H. Sprickman
Acting Chief
Division of Occupational
Safety Programming
1976/10/20
Standard Number: 1910.178
October 20, 1976
Mr. Walter Chapman, Director,
Safety/Security
Marion Power Shovel Company, Inc.
617 W. Center Street
Post Office Box 505
Marion, Ohio 43302
RE: Your letter dated September 22, 1976 - OSHA 1910.178
Dear Mr. Chapman:
Your letter refers to our standard 1910.178(a)(2). This paragraph deals with design and
construction requirements for powered industrial trucks, not with operator qualifications.
Our standards contain only minor reference to operator qualifications. In [1910.178(l)(1)(i)]
you will read, “Only trained and authorized operators shall be permitted to operate a pow-
ered industrial truck.”(Correction 02/16/99) [“The employer shall ensure that each power
industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as dem-
onstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this
paragraph (l).”] No mention is made of vision requirements. The ANSI Standard B56.1-1969
in Section 6 reads, “Operators of powered industrial trucks shall be physically qualified. An
examination should be made on an annual basis and include such things as field of vision,
hearing, depth perception, and reaction timing.”
[This document was edited on 12/22/00 to strike information that no longer reflects
current OSHA policy.]
While OSHA did not adopt this requirement, it merits your consideration. People with only
one eye do not generally have good depth perception; this could be a most important and
critical matter in some industrial operations. You, as an employer, must determine if full
vision is mandatory in your operations. We suggest you consult with your company’s medi-
cal department.
In closing we remind you that the standard does not apply to vehicles intended primarily for
earth moving or over-the-road hauling. Please contact us if we can be of further service.
Very truly yours,
Nicholas DiArchangel
Acting Regional Administrator
for Occupational Safety and Health
cc: Wash., D.C.
1977/02/14
Standard Number: 1910.22
Date: February 14, 1977
MEMORANDUM FOR: Donald E. MacKenzie, Acting Director
Office of Field Coordination and Experimental Programs
SUBJECT: 29 CFR 1910.22(b)(2), Aisles and Passageways
ATTENTION: Maureen Kelleher
REFERENCES: Hal Bingham
This is in response to your inquiry concerning issuance of citations where there are no
painted markings of permanent aisles and passageways for dirt floors or floors covered with
sand or dust.
The wording of the standard, 29 CFR 1910.22(b)(2), that aisles and passageways be
appropriately marked, does not require marking by painted yellow lines only. Painted yellow
lines are usually recognized as the most convenient and inexpensive way to mark aisles
and passageways since the lines normally last several years without maintenance or
repainting. Dirt floors or floors having continuous concentrations of sand or dust would
render the application of painted floor markings infeasible and impractical, especially in
foundries. Other appropriate methods such as marking pillars, powder stripping, flags, traffic
cones, barrels and many other devices are considered appropriate as long as recognition
of such is included in the vehicle operator and employee training programs. However, where
the need exists and there are no appropriate markings, citations will be issued.
Richard P. Wilson, Deputy Director
Federal Compliance and State Programs
[Corrected 4/24/2004]
1980/05/13
Standard Number: 1910.23(c)(1)
May 13, 1980
Mr. Paul M. Osborne
General Operations Manager
Eller Outdoor Advertising Co. of Colorado
Division of Combined Communications Corp.
P.O. Box 1468
Denver, Colorado 80201
Dear Mr. Osborne:
This is in response to your letter dated April 23, 1980, requesting a permanent variance from
Section 1926.104(b) - Tie-Off Systems, of the Occupational Safety and Health Regulations
for Construction.
Your request should have been made under Section 1910.23(c)(1) of the General Industry
Standards concerning the guarding of open-sided floors, platforms, and runways. Your
operation is covered under the General Industry Standards rather than the Construction
Regulations. The General Industry Standards do not have a section pertaining to tie-off
systems, therefore, a variance is not required.
OSHA has determined that when a standard guardrail is not feasible because it would result
in impairment of the work being performed alternate protection may be provided for employ-
ees. A tie-off system is acceptable as a method of meeting the intent of Section
1910.23(c)(1). A copy of OSHA Directive Number 75-40 is enclosed for your guidance.
Our technical staff has reviewed the sketch of the poster panel submitted with your appli-
cation. It has been determined that the eye bolts should be relocated to a position that would
be at least waist high for the employee’s safety belt and lanyard. Waist high should be the
lowest location in use to reduce the distance an employee would fall from the platform in the
event of an accident.
Affected employees should be notified of this decision in the same manner they were
notified of your request for a variance.
No further action will be taken on your request for a variance. If I can be of further assis-
tance, please contact my office at (202) 523-7144.
Sincerely,
James J. Concannon Director
Office of Variance Determinations
1982/01/28
Standard Number: 1910.212
January 28, 1982
Mr. James H. Tourtelotte
Robinson, Donovan, Madden & Berry, P.C.
Attorneys at Law
1500 Main Street - Suite 1400
Springfield, Massachusetts 01115
Dear Mr. Tourtelotte:
Thank you for your letter of November 30, 1981, regarding meat grinder standards. Please
accept our apology for the delay in response.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration enforces a performance safety standard
pertinent to all machines used by employees. The General Industry Standard 29 CFR
1910.212, general requirements for all machines, is applicable to meat grinders (copy
enclosed). Paragraph .212(a)(1) requires that one or more methods of machine guarding be
provided to protect the operator and other employees from the hazards created by the point
of operation, such as ingoing nip points. Paragraph .212(a)(3)(ii) further requires that the
point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury shall be
guarded.
Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the employer is responsible for the proper
safeguarding of equipment used by employees, whether or not the manufacturer of the
equipment provides adequate safeguards.
If we may be of further assistance, please call or write.
Sincerely,
John K. Barto Chief,
Division of Occupational Safety Programming
1982/02/12
Standard Number: 1910.23
February 12, 1982
Philip H. Clarkson, P.E.
Manager, Structural Engineering
Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.
Post Office Box 491
Spartanburg, South Carolina 29304
Dear Mr. Clarkson:
This is in response to your letter of January 19, 1982, concerning the use of a safety chain
in lieu of a gate. Your letter addressed to the Atlanta Regional Office was forwarded to this
office for response.
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(2) does require ladderway openings to be provided with a swinging gate
or offset passage. However, if in fact the safety chains used for top and intermediate rails
afford employees protection “at least as effective as” the swinging gate, the safety chains
would be adequate and noted as a de minimis violation.
Under OSHA’s operating procedures there are provisions whereby a de minimis violation
will be noted during the inspection for employers who have not met the exact requirements
and/or specifications of the standards. A de minimis violation is one which has no direct or
immediate relationship to the safety or health of employees, carries no penalties and does
not require abatement of the violation. A copy of the directive on this subject is enclosed for
your information.
If I may be of further assistance, please call or write.
Sincerely,
John K. Barto
Chief,
Division of Occupational Safety Programming
1983/06/03
Standard Number: 1926.550(a)(9)
June 3, 1983
Mr. Francis P. Dorcey
The Millgard Corporation
P.O. Box 2248
12822 Stark Road
Livonia, Michigan 48151
Dear Mr. Dorcey:
This is in response to your letter of May 11, 1983, requesting a clarification of 29 CFR
1926.550(a)(9) as it applies to drilling and pile driving operations.
29 CFR 1926.550(a)(9) does apply to drill and pile rigs, however, OSHA recognizes that it
may be functionally impossible to barricade such equipment if it is constantly moving in the
performance of the work operation. Whenever compliance with a standard is impossible,
OSHA requires employers to take all available alternative precautions. Your safety program,
including (1) Pointing out the swing radius danger by posting signs, (2) Instructing employ-
ees in the danger of swinging counterweights, (3)Instructing employees in the danger of rig
pinch points, (4) Instructing the operators to swing only on signals from the foreman or the
designated Signal Man, and (5) requiring employees not to move a rig until they know the
area is clear would appear to implement adequate alternative precautionary measures.
This interpretation is based on Federal standards. However, you should be aware that
Section 18 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act allows States to assume responsibility
for enforcement of their own occupational safety and health programs. There are currently
twenty-four such programs in operation. These states must enforce standards that are
either identical or at least effective as the Federal standards. A list of the State’s plan States
is enclosed.
If I may be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Bruce Hillenbrand
Acting Director, Federal Compliance
and State Programs
1991/12/19
Standard Number: 1910.36(d)
December 19, 1991
MEMORANDUM FOR: PATRICIA K. CLARK, DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMMING
FROM: LINDA R. ANKU
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: OBSTRUCTED EXIT PERMITTED BY USDA
The purpose of this memorandum is to bring to your attention an incident that may indicate
that some USDA inspectors are permitting means of egress to be obstructed based on a
requirement that certain doors be “sealed”. The doors are “sealed” to prevent contamination
of the food. As a result of the fire in North Carolina, USDA inspectors were instructed to
insure that “sealed” doors were not padlocked. An employer that had a padlock on a
“sealed” door, that was an exit, was required to remove it by a USDA inspector but was
permitted to insert a bolt through the hasp where the padlock had been. The bolt would have
had to be manually removed before the door could be opened.
The bolt inserted through the hasp had a hole in it through which a wire was run. The wire
could only be removed if it was broken, which would indicate that the “sealed” door had
been opened. The USDA inspector did not realize that the method used to seal the door was
still not in compliance with OSHA regulations as he only had been instructed to insure that
such doors were not padlocked.
The USDA was contacted and advised of the problem and they took immediate steps to
have it corrected. However, the incident raises serious concerns as to whether this is
occurring at other USDA regulated facilities. The USDA representative indicated that they
are to receive safety training from OSHA in the near future but until then there could be a
problem with obstructed exits. We would suggest that consideration be given to immediately
contacting the USDA and urging them to advise their inspectors as to what constitutes an
obstructed exit.
This incident occurred at:
M.H.B. Inc. dba Harrisons Meatpacking
1207 Almond Street
Williamsport, Pa. 17702
If you need any additional information regarding the preceding, please contact John McFee
at FTS 596-1201.
1993/11/15
Standard Number: 1910.146(c)(7); 1910.147; 1910.146(b)
November 15, 1993
Mr. Trey Mayfield
Can Manufacturers Institute
1625 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
Dear Mr. Mayfield:
This is in response to your letter of August 30, concerning the Permit-Required Confined
Space (PRCS) standard (1910.146) and a work practice in your Industry. Specifically you
are seeking confirmation that the work practices outlined in your letter would constitute
compliance with 1910.146(c)(7). Please accept our apology for the delay in this response.
Metal container curing ovens meet the definition of a PRCS. Therefore, employee entry into
such spaces must be conducted in compliance with the PRCS standard. An employer who
eliminates the hazards from a permit space, as provided by paragraph (c)(7) of the stan-
dard, can reclassify that space as a non-permit confined space. That reclassification, which
would remain in effect as long as the hazards remain eliminated, would allow employers to
have employees enter the curing ovens without implementing a permit space program.
Item 1 of your letter addresses using Lockout-Tagout (1910.147) procedures to eliminate
the hazards of moving machinery and natural gas. We agree that through the application of
1910.147, the hazards of stored energy and moving machinery would be eliminated. We do
not agree that lockout-tagout would eliminate the natural gas hazard. Hazard elimination in
that case would require one of the techniques (blanking, blinding, misaligning or removing
sections of lines or pipe, and double block and bleed system) referenced in the definition of
“isolation” (see paragraph (b) of 1910.146).
Item 2 indicates that a cool down time is allotted so that the latent heat of the oven does not
create a heat exposure hazard. We concur with the cool down practice to eliminate this heat
stress potential. However, we suggest the actual job safety practice indicate a maximum
oven temperature allowable or other measurable parameter (period of time) allotted before
entry.
Item 3 describes your process for verifying that there are no atmospheric hazards. The
standard does not specify a duration of time over which verification monitoring must be
done. However, we do not see a problem with the documented baseline monitoring program
being conducted over an 8 hour period of time as long as the employer can prove that
atmospheric hazards have been eliminated from the ovens before an employee enters.
Verification monitoring with the ventilation system off will be needed to establish that atmo-
spheric hazards have been eliminated. OSHA agrees that spot air monitoring for
atmospheric monitoring for atmospheric hazards is not necessarily required by paragraph
(c)(7), however, it is the most appropriate way of determining that atmospheric hazards
have not manifested themselves.
Item 4 prohibiting solvents or welding during non-permit entries is a sound practice and
should be continued.
Should you have further questions concerning your request please contact Mr. Don
Kallstrom in the Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance (202) 219-8031.
Sincerely,
Roger A. Clark, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs
1994/07/26
Standard Number: 1903.14(f)
July 26, 1994
MEMORANDUM FOR: REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS
FROM: JAMES W. STANLEY
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY
SUBJECT: OSHA Policy Regarding Voluntarily
Rescue Activities
The purpose of this memorandum is to reiterate OSHA’s citation policy regarding employers
whose employees perform or attempt to perform rescues of individuals in life-threatening
danger. If an employer has met his or her responsibilities as outlined in the attached
memorandum, that employer shall not be cited for an employee’s voluntary heroic actions.
Attachment
March 31, 1994
MEMORANDUM FOR: Regional Administrators
THROUGH: LEO CAREY, Director
Office of Field Programs
FROM: H. BERRIEN ZETTLER, Deputy Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs
SUBJECT: Policy Regarding Voluntary Rescue
Activities
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is aware that conditions may
arise at workplaces where employees are exposed to life-threatening situations; and fellow
employees may enter a danger zone in an attempt to rescue the imperiled workers, thereby
exposing themselves to mortal danger. Such situations too often lead to the death of the
would be rescuer as well as the person originally in danger. It is not the intent of OSHA to
interfere with or to regulate an individual’s choice to place himself/herself heroically at risk
to save the life of another person. OSHA believes, however, that it is appropriate to provide
instruction to the field offices as to the agency’s citation policy toward employers whose
employees perform or attempt to perform rescues of individuals in life-threatening danger.
Individuals who place themselves at risk to save the life of another person fall into two
groups: those who have an occupational responsibility to rescue others and those who do
not. The safety and health of persons designated for service on rescue teams or directed to
perform rescue activities in the course of carrying out the duties of their jobs are the
responsibility of the employer, and citations are appropriate for violations causing hazards
to which such employees are exposed. Citations could be issued, for example, if appropri-
ate rescue equipment is not provided or if an employee is sent into danger without adequate
personal protective equipment.
Employer responsibility for employees with no occupational rescue obligation depends on
the work environment. Should an occasion arise where the employees of such an employer
expose themselves in an attempt to rescue a fellow worker, normally no citation shall be
issued to the employer, whether or not the rescue is successful. An exception to this rule is
discussed in the following paragraph.
In work environments where there is little or no foreseeable likelihood of a life-threatening
emergency, the employer would not be required to provide either rescue equipment or
training and would not be subject to citation. On the other hand, there are certain work-
place operations where the likelihood of life-threatening accidents is relatively high,
such as confined spaces, hazardous waste and emergency response situations,
working on or near unguarded energized power conductors, trenches and excava-
tions, diving operations and working around or over water. OSHA believes that
employers with employees in these situations, who may be faced with a rescue decision,
have the obligation to implement an accident prevention program which will address how
such emergencies should be addressed by his employees and to ensure that each such
employee is trained to recognize the hazards inherent in rescue efforts and the associated
risks to potential rescuers not trained in or properly equipped for rescue operations.
Although this does not necessarily mean that the employer is required to provide rescue
equipment (except where required by a specific standard, e.g., 1926.106) or to train the
employees in proper rescue procedures unless he intends them to conduct rescues, cir-
cumstances may arise where the employer may be under an obligation to supply such
equipment, e.g., where he knows that conditions at a site are dangerous and that his
employees are likely to attempt rescues. It does mean that he must instruct employees in
the dangers attendant upon rescuing persons without such training and equipment and that
they are not to attempt such rescues in the absence of proper equipment and training.
OSHA bases its understanding on the fact that in construction, employers are required to
have an accident prevention program (29 CFR 1926.20(b)(l)) and a training program
addressing the specific hazards which their employees are likely to encounter on their
worksites (29 CFR 1926.21). In general industry, although there is no overall training
requirement, specific training requirements exist relating to hazard communication, permit-
required confined spaces, hazardous waste and emergency response, the use of
respiratory protection and other standards.
If an employer has trained his or her employees as outlined in this document, that employer
will not be cited for an employee’s voluntary heroic actions (whether or not they are
successful).
This memorandum establishes OSHA’s citation policy regarding voluntary rescue activities
until the development of a directive is completed. This memorandum should be shared with
the State Program designees, who are urged to adopt a similar policy.
103D CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
S._______________
____________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
Mr. KEMPTHORNE (for himself. ______________________________
______________________________________________________
_______________) introduced the following bill: which
was read twice and referred to the Committee on
____________________________
____________________________
A BILL
To provide an exemption from citation by the Secretary
of Labor under the Occupational Safety and Health Act
to employers of individuals who perform rescues of
individuals in imminent danger as a result of an
accident, and for other purposes.
1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives
2 of the United States America in Congress assembled,
3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
4 This Act may be cited as the “Heroic Exemptions to
5 Regulation Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act” (HERO
6 Act).
1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.
2 (a) FINDINGS.--Congress finds that--
3 (1) the strict application of existing Occupational
4 Safety and Health Administration regulations
5 requires the issuance of a citation to an employer in
6 a circumstance in which an employee of such employer
7 has voluntarily acted in a heroic manner to
8 rescue individuals from imminent harm during work
9 hours;
10 (2) application of such regulations to employers
11 in such circumstance causes hardships to those employers
1996/10/18
Standard Number: 1910 Subpart D; 1910.132(d)
October 18, 1996
MEMORANDUM REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS
FOR:
FROM: JOHN B. MILES, JR, DIRECTOR [DIRECTORATE OF
ENFORCEMENT PROGRAMS]
SUBJECT: Enforcement of Fall Protection on Moving Stock
The Directorate has been asked by the National Grain and Food Association (NGFA) to
clarify the Agency’s enforcement policy relating to fall hazards from the tops of “rolling
stock,” such as rail tank or hopper cars and tank or hopper trucks or trailers. The reason for
this request is that the NGFA is concerned that the Agency may inappropriately issue
citations for fall hazards from such equipment. Part of the NGFA’s concern is that inspectors
from the Federal Grain Inspection Service allegedly have indicated to grain handling com-
panies that they are unwilling to place themselves in situations which potentially violate
OSHA regulations, thereby, risking citation.
The contents of rolling stock, when located in yards, on sidings or similar locations, fre-
quently have to be sampled to ensure continued grain quality. Without Federal grain
inspection services, no grain can be moved to market. Employees or inspectors may walk
along the tops of the cars while they go from car to car to obtain samples.
The current fall protection standard in general industry (Subpart D) does not specifically
address fall hazards from the tops of rolling stock. The new proposed fall protection stan-
dard, 55 Fed. Reg. 13360, explicitly excludes rolling stock from coverage. The enforcement
policy of the Agency, consequently, is that falls from rolling stock also will not be cited under
Subpart D.
Additionally, it would not be appropriate to use the personal protection equipment standard,
29 CFR 1910.132(d), to cite exposure to fall hazards from the tops of rolling stock, unless
employees are working atop stock that is positioned inside of or contiguous to a building or
other structure where the installation of fall protection is feasible. In such cases, fall pro-
tection systems often can be and, in fact, are used in many facilities in the industry.
Apart from the safety obligations of grain handling companies toward their employees, the
U.S. Department of Agriculture is obligated under Section 1960.9, as an employer, to
provide its employees, the grain inspectors, a place of employment that is free from rec-
ognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious harm, in addition
to complying with OSHA’s regulations.
The General Duty Clause, Section 5(a)(1) of the OSHAct, requires an employer to provide
employees with a workplace that is free from hazards that are recognized by the employer’s
industry and that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm. Thus, where feasible
means exist to eliminate or materially reduce the hazard, a citation can be issued for a
Section 5(a)(1) violation. For example, in the case of inclement weather such as icy con-
ditions or heavy rains and winds, both the grain handling company and the U.S. Department
of Agriculture are responsible for guarding against workplace hazards. In addition to making
a determination as to whether the tops of the rail cars are safe and free from hazards to
allow employees to perform their duties, the employers should also make an assessment of
the employee’s physical ability to perform the job and ensure that employees have received
adequate training to perform the job safely.
[Corrected 2/6/2009]
1997/04/11
Standard Number: 1910.178(a)(4)
April 11, 1997
Mr. Kenneth J. Yotz
Senior Vice President
Environmental, Management
and Training Systems, Inc.
919 St Andrews Circle
Geneva, Illinois 60134-2995
Dear Mr.Yotz:
This is in further response to your letter of January 12, requesting clarification of the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Powered Industrial Truck standard,
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4). I regret the delay in responding to your. Your questions have been
included in this response for clarity.
1. Clearly, OSHA (and ANSI) requires that modifications and additions which affect the
capacity and safe operation require prior written manufacturers’ approval [29 CFR
1910.178(a)(4)]. What measures are available to an employer if the manufacturer is no
longer in business?
Reply: 29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4) requires that “Modifications and additions which affect
the capacity and safe operation shall not be performed by the customer or user without
manufacturers prior written approval. Capacity, operation, and maintenance instruction
plates, tags, or decals shall be changed accordingly.” In the event that a powered
industrial truck manufacturer has been sold to another company and is no longer in
business, the user or customer must contact the purchasing company to request
approval. In the event that the original powered industrial truck manufacturer is no
longer in business and has not been purchased by another entity, the user or customer
would be required to contact a Qualified Registered Professional Engineer for approval
of such modifications and additions.
2. Experience has demonstrated that manufacturers of forklifts and attachments are
reluctant to provide written approval due to liability considerations. Are any other
options available to employers who wish to use manufactured or fabricated attach-
ments with a forklift? Are a safety analysis and marking of the forklift by the employer
acceptable? If so, must the analysis be performed by a registered engineer.
Reply: With regard to compliance with 1910.178(a)(4), employers must seek written
approval from powered industrial truck manufacturers when modifications and addi-
tions affect the capacity and safe operation. However, if no response or a negative
response is received from the manufacturer, OSHA will accept a written approval of the
modification/addition from a Qualified Registered Professional Engineer. A Qualified
Registered Professional Engineer must perform a safety analysis and address any
safety and/or structural issues contained in the manufacturer&39;s negative response
1997/06/27
Standard Number: 1910.1052
June 27, 1997
The Honorable Bud Cramer
U.S. House of Representatives
2416 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515-0105
Dear Congressman Cramer:
Thank you for your letter of January 16, 1997, regarding the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration’s (OSHA) Methylene Chloride (MC) Standard. We wish to assure you that
OSHA is aware of the concerns you raise regarding the impacts of the MC rule and has
addressed these concerns in the preamble to the final rule and the Final Economic Analysis.
We would like to take this opportunity to clarify some misimpressions being raised about the
risks of MC exposure and the methods available to reduce those risks to the U.S. workforce.
Please accept our apology for the delay in this response.
The OSHA MC rulemaking was initiated in 1986 when the Agency published an Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in response to a petition from the United Auto Workers
(joined by several other unions) to regulate MC because it was shown to be carcinogenic in
laboratory animals. In 1991, OSHA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking which
included a proposed 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) permissible exposure limit (PEL)
of 25 ppm, a short-term exposure limit of 125 ppm and ancillary provisions covering expo-
sure monitoring, medical surveillance, regulated areas, etc. In 1992, the Agency convened
informal public hearings on the proposed standard in Washington, DC and San Francisco,
CA. In addition, the rulemaking record was opened several times to receive public comment
on feasibility and risk assessment issues.
The final MC rule (published in the Federal Register on January 10, 1997 (62 FR 1493)) is
based on careful evaluation of all available information, including information submitted to
the record by representatives of small businesses. OSHA’s rulemaking record (now in
excess of 48,000 pages of information) contains extensive data regarding the feasibility of
compliance with the final rule, including information on substitutes for MC, modifications to
control or process equipment and alterations in work practices. Many of these feasible
methods of compliance are as simple and common-sensical as providing adequate venti-
lation, or covering tanks and containers when not in use. Data in the record indicates that
the final MC regulation is feasible in all affected industries. OSHA must base its findings on
its rulemaking record and must promulgate a regulation that is technologically and eco-
nomically feasible for all affected industries.
OSHA has been particularly concerned with the ability of small businesses to comply with
the MC standard. Therefore the Agency has streamlined requirements to reduce potential
economic and paperwork burdens on such employers, including extending compliance
deadlines for employers with fewer than 20 employees. Many of the actions taken by OSHA
to reduce the potential compliance burdens in the final MC rule were the direct result of input
to the MC rulemaking by small employers.
OSHA has thoroughly evaluated all information submitted to the record concerning the
health effects of MC, including cancer, and has used this information to conduct a quanti-
tative risk assessment using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) information
and cutting-edge statistical methodologies. Indeed, industry groups have repeatedly asked
OSHA to adopt a PBPK approach to its MC risk assessment; OSHA has determined that the
data base (notably including the new data submitted by the Halogenated Solvents Industry
Alliance (HSIA)) is now sufficiently reliable and detailed to support such an approach. The
Agency has determined that the risks to workers exposed to MC at levels greater than 25
ppm as an 8-hour TWA greatly exceed the level of risk deemed significant by the Supreme
Court and would be clearly unacceptable. The evidence that a limit of 50 ppm would be
severely inadequate to protect workers includes a wealth of animal bioassay data, numer-
ous studies detailing the human metabolism of MC to carcinogenic products, risk
assessment based on these data, and several epidemiologic studies that suggest an
elevated risk of biliary cancer and astrocytic brain cancer in MC-exposed workers.
After completing its analyses, OSHA briefed the scientific staff from the Environmental
Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institute for Environ-
mental Health Sciences, and the Consumer Product Safety Commission on the Agency’s
analysis of the submitted studies and OSHA’s revised risk assessment. The professionals
at these meetings agreed with OSHA’s characterization of the risks posed by MC and
specifically praised the Agency for incorporating the specific type of additional information
(PBPK data) that the HSIA and others had advocated be used.
The PBPK data and model structures used as the basis of OSHA’s final risk assessment
were available in the record for review and comment. Several PBPK models were submitted
to the record and elicited comments during the MC rulemaking. In the course of drafting the
final risk assessment, OSHA reanalyzed all of the available and appropriate data in the
record, but did not revise the underlying assumptions upon which its preliminary risk
assessment and the PBPK-based assessments submitted to the Agency relied. In October
1995, OSHA re-opened the rulemaking record specifically for the purpose of incorporating
mechanistic data submitted to the Agency by the HSIA. OSHA requested comments on how
that data should be used in characterizing the risks of MC. Based on its analysis of the data
and comments received, OSHA made the appropriate changes to its risk assessment. In
addition, the rulemaking record was opened serval times to receive public comment on the
key issues raised on feasibility and MC risk assessment.
OSHA’s final MC risk assessment estimates that at lifetime occupational exposure to 25
ppm, the additional risk of dying of cancer is 3.6 deaths per 1000 workers. OSHA’s goal,
where technologically and economically feasible, is to reduce cancer risks to below 1 death
per 1000, consistent with Supreme Court guidance. Other agencies with statutory obliga-
tions to protect the general population aim for levels of protection more than 100 times
greater than the level used by OSHA. Although the risks at 25 ppm are significant, the
Agency is currently constrained from reducing the PEL to below 25 ppm due to a lack of
definitive evidence documenting the feasibility of lower limits. OSHA has promulgated the
standard at 25 ppm, in order to reduce risks and because the Agency has determined that
25 ppm is technologically and economically feasible across industry sectors.
Thank you for bringing your concerns to our attention. Your interest in occupational safety
and health is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Adam M. Finkel, Sc.D.
Director
Health Standards Programs
January 16, 1997 Mr. Joseph Dear
Assistant Secretary
Occupational Health & Safety Administration
Third Street and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20210
Dear Mr. Dear:
I am writing about the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) workplace
standard for methylene chloride which I understand OSHA intends to issue shortly. I have
constituents who have indicated they would have significant problems in complying with a
25 parts-per-million limit. I would appreciate the opportunity to explore my concerns with you
before the final standard is issued.
Specifically, I understand the risk assessment and the economic analyses that are the basis
for the rule have changed significantly over the past few months. OSHA should give the
public an opportunity to comment on the revised scientific and economic analyses before
taking final action on the methylene chloride standard, unless there is a statutory or judicial
deadline that precludes OSHA from taking this action. This would also allow OSHA to have
the benefit of participating in the interagency characterization of the potential risk posed by
methylene chloride under the EPA guidelines, expected to be completed in 1997.
In addition, the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement fairness Act requires the OSHA
seek congressional review of the methylene chloride standard. If the methylene chloride
standard is issued without giving the public an opportunity to review and comment on the
revised scientific and economic analyses, this review may be extensive. I urge you to take
the time to address valid constituent concerns, so there can be widespread congressional
support for OSHA’s final action.
Sincerely,
Bud Cramer
Member of Congress
1998/07/21
Standard Number: 1926.451; 1926.451(g)(1)(vii); 1926.452(w); 1926.453
July 21, 1998
Dennis Vance
Safety Specialist
Safety Services
711 Low Gap Road
Princeton, WV 24740
Dear Mr. Vance:
RE: 1926.451(g); 1926.452(w);1926.453; 1926.502(d); CPL 2-1.23; ANSI A92.2; ANSI
A92.6; scissors lift.
This is in response to your letter of May 27 to the Occupational Safety and Health Admin-
istration (OSHA) in which you asked whether an employee working from a scissors lift
equipped with guardrails needed to wear a “safety harness.” You further expressed concern
for the confusion created by OSHA’s scaffold standard and its directive, CPL 2.112 (sic).
Please accept our apology for the delay in responding to this inquiry and for any previously
submitted requests.
We recognize that there is confusion regarding scissors lifts and the appropriate standards
governing such equipment. The confusion stems from the way OSHA’s directive is worded.
In CPL 2-1.23, titled “Inspection Procedures for Enforcing Subpart L, Scaffolds Used in
Construction - 29 CFR 1926.450-454,” dated January 7, 1997, the statement in paragraph
K.9.b states that scissors lifts are addressed by 1926.453, Aerial Lifts, and not by
1926.452(w), Mobile Scaffolds. The directive should have more clearly indicated that only
aerial lifts meeting the design and construction of the American National Standards Institute
(ANSI) A92.2, Vehicle Mounted Elevating and Rotating Work Platforms, are addressed by
1926.453 since the coverage of that section is specifically limited to such lifts. All other types
of mobile lifts would be covered by the specific requirements at 1926.452(w) and/or the
general requirements of 1926.451. Please note, however, that if an employer is in full
compliance with the requirements of the relevant document of the ANSI A92 series, OSHA
would consider that compliance as providing an appropriate degree of safety for employees.
In regards to your specific question, when working from an elevated scissors lift (ANSI
A92.6 series), a worker need only be protected from falling by a properly designed and
maintained guardrail system. However, if the guardrail system is less than adequate, or the
worker leaves the safety of the work platform, an additional fall protection device would be
required. The general scaffolding fall protection provision found in 1926.451(g)(1)(vii) reads
in part, “[f]or all scaffolds not otherwise specified in this section, each employee shall be
protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrails systems.”
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us again by writing
to OSHA-Directorate of Construction, Office of Construction Standards and Compliance
Assistance, Room N3621, 200 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20210.
Sincerely,
Russell B. Swanson, Director
Directorate of Construction
1999/10/01
Standard Number: 1910.178(l); 1926.602(c); 1926.602(d)
October 1, 1999
Larry Edginton
Director, Safety & Health
International Union of Operating Engineers
1125 Seventeenth Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20036
Re: Powered Industrial Truck Training: §§1910.178(l) and 1926.602(c) and (d)
Dear Mr. Edginton:
Thank you for your letter dated May 18 to the Occupational Safety and Health Administra-
tion (OSHA) regarding the new requirements for powered industrial truck (PIT) operator
training in §1910.178(l) (under §1926.602(d), those requirements are applicable to employ-
ers engaged in construction). As you state in the letter, many International Union of
Operating Engineers (IUOE) members may work for several employers over the course of
a year. The letter indicates that providing or evaluating operator training presents practical
problems for construction industry employers. You explain that IUOE locals are implement-
ing standardized PIT training programs throughout the U.S. in response to the December 1,
1998, final rule, and you ask several questions regarding implementation of the standard.
Equipment covered by the Powered Industrial Truck standard
The construction standard for powered industrial trucks can be found in subpart O, 29 CFR
1926.602(c). Section 1926.602(c) incorporates the consensus standard ANSI B56.1 by
reference and, therefore, has the same scope as the ANSI standard. Section
1926.602(c)(1)(vi), which was not changed by the new PIT training rule (volume 63 of the
Federal Register on page 66255), states:
“All industrial trucks in use shall meet the applicable requirements of design, construction,
stability, inspection, testing, maintenance, and operation, as defined in American National
Standards Institute B56.1, 1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks.”
The PIT training rule references not only ANSI B56.1 (the revised title is “ASME B56.1”), but
further clarifies that the final rule applies to the vehicles covered by other volumes of
consensus standards, including ASME B56.6, Rough Terrain Forklift Trucks (63 FR 66255).
Your letter quotes the definition of a rough-terrain forklift taken from the American Society
of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) standard B56.6, and you ask whether the standard only
applies to various types of equipment used on construction job sites that conform to that
definition. It reads in part, “....a wheeled-type truck designed primarily as a fork truck with a
vertical mast and/or pivoted boom, variable reach or of fixed length, which may be equipped
with attachments....” That definition describes rough-terrain forklifts that are used primarily
in construction; however, this should not be considered an all inclusive list for equipment
covered by subpart O.
Neither consensus standard referenced in subpart O (ANSI/ASME B56.1 and ASME B56.6)
directly addresses whether the equipment must have a vertical mast and/or a pivoted boom
to be covered by the standard. Subpart O does not define rough-terrain forklifts, nor does
the December 1, 1998, final rule. However, the preamble lists various types of vehicles that
are covered by the rule (63 FR 66239), of which several do not have vertical masts or
pivoted booms, such as low lift platform trucks and motorized hand trucks. So, neither a
vertical mast nor a pivoted boom is a prerequisite for coverage under the standard.
Training program content
The new training provisions of §1926.602(d) can be found in §1910.178(l). Section
1910.178(l)(3) addresses training program content and requires that employees receive
training in various truck-related topics, workplace-related topics and in the requirements of
this section of the rule. It further lists sub-topics that should be included, unless a particular
topic is not relevant to the type of vehicle or workplace.
Your letter lists four subjects included in the IUOE Local’s PIT training, and you ask if
construction employers are required to provide any additional training for employees. Your
list did not include training in the standard itself, as required in §1910.178(l)(3)(iii). In
addition, employers may need to ensure that additional training on site-specific or truck-
specific matters is provided. One such example might be instruction on the safe operation
of trucks with specialized attachments so that the operator understands the restrictions and
limitations of the vehicle with those attachments. However, if the employee already has
been trained to operate with those attachments, then the employer need not duplicate that
training.
Paragraph 4.19 of ASME B56.1-1993 (the current edition of that consensus standard)
contains specific operator training topics that were the basis for the topics in paragraph (l)(3)
of the final rule. A training program that covers these topics would comply with (l)(3) (for the
complete text of paragraph 4.19, see the preamble at 63 FR 66240-66241).
You also ask whether employees trained before December 1, 1999, the date for compliance
with the standard, need to have their performance evaluated according to the 3-year anni-
versary of their training or the December 1 compliance date. Paragraph (l)(4)(iii) requires
that an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator’s performance be conducted
once every three years to ensure that the employee has retained and continues to use the
knowledge and skills necessary to operation the vehicle safely. The date of the previous
training controls the time frame for the next evaluation, not the compliance date for the
standard.
Refresher training time frame
The PIT provisions governing refresher training and evaluations are located in §1910.178(l)
(4). This section requires refresher training to be provided to ensure that the operator
continues to have the knowledge and skills to operate the powered industrial truck safely.
You note that this section specifies no time frame in which refresher training, prompted by
the list of triggers in paragraph (l)(4(ii), is to occur. You ask if the employee must receive this
training before he/she is allowed to continue operating the PIT. The standard’s performance
language does not set an absolute requirement that an operator cease to work immediately
following an incident. This allows employers flexibility when considering the severity of the
incident that triggered the need for retraining.
The final rule provides a performance-oriented and cost-effective approach to refresher
training. The type, amount, and timing of refresher training depends on several factors, such
as the equipment and terrain characteristics, nature of the unsafe act, and the potential for
an accident or other incidents of unsafe acts or violations of §1910.178 to occur or reoccur.
Operator certification
Employers are required to certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated. As
required by §1910.178(l)(6), the certification shall include the name of the operator, the date
of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the
training or evaluation.
You ask if employers can rely solely on evaluation and certification provided by third party
trainers. OSHA did not specify that the employer, or supervisor, or any other particular
person, must conduct the training and evaluation, only that the training and evaluation be
conducted by a person who is qualified. The training criteria are sufficiently detailed so that
employers and professional trainers can provide adequate training. The preamble indicates
that qualified third-party trainers could provide the training (63 FR 66,252). This was envi-
sioned as an important tool for meeting the requirements of the standard. As long as the
employer has a reasonable basis to believe that the third-party trainer is qualified and has
a program that meets the requirements of the standard, it can rely on that trainer to conduct
the training and evaluation of employees and can certify that these employees have been
trained. However, as mentioned earlier, the employer may need to provide additional train-
ing on site-specific or truck-specific matters.
Maintaining Records
You further ask who must maintain the training and certification records. Paragraph (l)(6)
does not specify who must maintain the records; however, the employer is ultimately
responsible for ensuring the availability of these records. Third-party trainers who agree to
maintain the records would also need to ensure their immediate availability to the employer.
If you require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us again by writing to:
OSHA-Directorate of Construction, Office of Construction Standards and Compliance Assis-
tance, Room N3468, 200 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20210.
Sincerely,
Russell B. Swanson, Director
Directorate of Construction
1999/10/21
Standard Number: 1926.550(a)(19)
October 21, 1999
Ms. Yvonne Horton
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
P.O. Box 2008
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6103
RE: 29 CFR 1926.550(a)(19)
Dear Ms. Horton:
This is in response to your April 15, 1999, letter in which you ask a question relating the
requirements of 29 CFR 1926.550 (Cranes, Derricks, Hoists, Elevators and Conveyors) with
respect to employees working near or under suspended loads.
Question 1: Under what circumstances may employees guide a suspended load by
placing their hands on it? Is it permissible for employees to place their hands on a
load that is seven feet high if they stand to the side of, and not under, the load?
Answer: Employees may stand beside a suspended load and guide it into place with
their hands when, in view of the height of the load, actual and potential swing of the
load and trip hazards, the employees are not at risk of being struck by the load if it
were to fall.
29 CFR 1926.550(a)(19) states “All employees shall be kept clear of loads about to be lifted
and of suspended loads.” When employees are guiding suspended loads into place,
employees can get near the load and assist in guiding the load in, but at no time shall the
employee be at risk of being struck by the load if it were to fall or swing out of control. If an
employee needs to guide a load that is being lowered, but the load is at a height that would
place the employee at risk of becoming off balance while reaching for the load, tripping and
falling under it, or is otherwise at risk of being struck by the load if it were to fall or swing out
of control, the employee must use tag lines or other means to guide it. An employee may
stand aside a load that is seven feet high and guide it with his or her hands only where these
risk factors are absent.
Question 2: Does the standard permit employees to put their hands under a raised
load to place blocks?
Answer: When it is infeasible for an employee to keep his or her hands out from
under a raised load while placing block under it, the employer shall ensure that the
load is not released until the employee’s hands are removed from under the load.
If blocks need to be placed under a suspended load, and conditions exist that prevent the
employer from using blocks long enough to allow employees to keep their hands out from
under the load, employees may, using appropriate care, place their hands under the load to
set the blocks. When using crawler, truck and locomotive cranes, Section 5-3.3 (Signals) of
the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B30.5-1968, which is incorporated into the
OSHA standard by §1926.550 (b)(2), requires that the crane operator not release or lower
the load further until the operator receives a signal to do so. ANSI signal requirements for
other types of cranes are incorporated by §1926.550 (a)(4). At no time shall an employee
place their hands under a load that is being lowered.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us again by writing
to: Directorate of Construction - OSHA Office of Construction Standard and Compliance
Assistance, Room N3468, 200 Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington D.C. 20210.
Sincerely,
Russell B. Swanson, Director
Directorate of Construction
2000/01/13
Standard Number: 1926.1053(a)(19); 1926.1053(a)(18); 1926.502(d)(16)(iii); 1926.1050(b)
January 13, 2000
Mr. Peter G. Chaney
Mechanical Contractors Association of America, Inc.
1385 Piccard Drive
Rockville, MD 20850-4340
RE: [29 CFR 1926] Subpart X
Dear Mr. Chaney:
This is in response to your May 26, 1999, letter in which you ask for clarification of several
issues relating to the use of fall protection when working from ladders during construction
work. You specifically ask if OSHA has any requirements for the use of fall protection when
working from ladders at heights greater than six feet. We apologize for the lateness of this
response.
Fixed ladders: fall protection must be provided for employees climbing or working on
fixed ladders above 24 feet.
29 CFR 1926.1053(a)(19) states that fall protection must be provided whenever the length
of climb on a fixed ladder equals or exceeds 24 feet. A fixed ladder is “a ladder that cannot
be readily moved or carried because it is an integral part of a building or structure”
(§1926.1050(b)). Also, even if the length of climb is less than 24 feet, under
§1926.1053(a)(18), cages, wells, ladder safety devices, or self-retracting lifelines must be
provided where the top of the fixed ladder is greater than 24 feet above lower levels.
Portable ladders: fall protection is not required for employees climbing or working on
portable ladders.
Neither the ladder standard (29 CFR 1926, subpart X) nor the fall protection standard (29
CFR 1926, subpart M) requires fall protection for workers while working on portable ladders.
You note that a number of general contractors in Georgia “are attempting to require personal
fall arrest systems for their subcontractors working on ladders 6 feet or higher.” Although the
OSHA standards do not require fall protection for workers on fixed ladders below 24 feet or
on portable ladders, we encourage employers to provide additional protection.
Personal Fall Arrest Systems can be set up to limit arrested falls to less then 15 feet.
In your letter you assert that personal fall arrest systems will not arrest a fall from an
elevation lower than 15 feet. When anchored above the worker, a typical personal fall arrest
system will arrest a fall in 6 feet or less. Using a six foot lanyard, a fall distance as high as
approximately 14 feet would result only if the system were anchored at the worker’s feet, as
explained below.
Several factors must be considered in determining how much distance will be needed for a
fall arrest system to work — to prevent the worker from contacting the next lower level. First,
under §1926.502(d)(16)(iii), a personal fall arrest system must prevent the employee from
contacting the level below. A 6 foot lanyard that incorporates a shock absorbing system may
have a total extension of up to about 9½ feet before a fall is completely arrested. Because
the lanyard is attached to the body harness at a point that is more than half-way up the body,
an additional distance of about 3-4 feet must be added to assure that no part of the
employee’s body makes contact with the surface.
Second, under §1926.502(d)(16)(iii), a personal fall arrest system must limit an employee’s
free fall to not more than six feet. “Free fall” is defined in the standard as “the vertical
displacement of the fall arrest attachment point on the employee’s ... body harness between
onset of the fall and just before the system begins to apply force to arrest the fall.” If a 6 foot
lanyard is rigged to an anchorage at floor level, the total free fall would be the sum of the
vertical distance between the attachment point on the body harness and the floor (usually
4 to 4½ feet) plus the length of the lanyard (6 feet in this example), which totals about 10
feet. That means that the use of a 6 foot lanyard, rigged to an anchorage at the worker’s feet
would result in a free fall in excess of the 6 foot limit. That would only be allowed where the
employer cannot provide a more suitable anchorage or other form of fall protection.
Where a person is standing on the surface to which the arrest system is anchored, if a fall
occurred, the person would first fall the distance of the anchor point to the location of the
lanyard attachment on the body harness, which is usually approximately 4½ feet (this will
vary with the height of the worker). The worker would then fall the length of the lanyard,
which in this example is 6 feet. Finally, assuming a shock absorbing system were incorpo-
rated into the lanyard, the worker would fall another 3½ feet if the full length of the shock
absorber was used. The total of these distances is about 14 feet.
Remember that in many situations fall distances can be eliminated altogether by using
restraint systems, which are set-up to prevent the worker from stepping past the walking/
working surface edge. These systems are often attached to catenary lines. In work involving
the construction of a “leading edge” (where the work surface itself is being constructed and
advances as the work progresses), the catenary line is periodically advanced to keep pace
with the advancing work. Retractable lanyards are another option that can often be used.
OSHA’s decision not to require the use of personal fall arrest systems in other
situations while working on ladders.
Apart from the above requirements, you ask why OSHA did not require the use of personal
fall arrest equipment whenever an employee is working 15 feet or higher on a ladder (you
do not specify whether you are asking this with respect to fixed or portable ladders or both).
You suggest that this may have been due to fall arrest systems causing a “greater hazard.”
The preamble to the standard does not explain why fall arrest equipment was not mandated
for situations other than those specified in §1926.1053(a)(18) and 1926.1053(a)(19). How-
ever, the use of personal fall protection does not generally result in a greater hazard.
Working without fall protection continues to be one of the leading causes of fatalities in the
construction industry.
2000/03/07
Standard Number: 1910.178(a)
March 7, 2000
Ms. Michele Corbin
Pennsylvania Landscape & Nursery Association
1707 South Cameron Street
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17104
Dear Ms. Corbin:
Thank you for your February 4, 2000 letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Admin-
istration’s (OSHA’s) [Directorate of Enforcement Programs (DEP)]. Your letter has been
referred to the [Office of General Industry Enforcement (GIE)] for answers to your questions
regarding operator training for powered industrial trucks. Your specific questions have been
restated below for clarity.
Question 1. If a vehicle that is intended primarily for earth moving utilizes removable forks,
would the vehicle fall under the Powered Industrial Truck Regulations?
Response. The preamble to the Final Rule, found on page 66255 of Federal Register Vol.
63, No. 230, clearly states that equipment that was designed to move earth but has been
modified to accept forks is not covered be the final rule. Therefore, if your vehicle is
designed as earth moving equipment, it would not be considered a powered industrial truck
within the scope of §1910.178.
Question 2. Would a skid steer be considered an earth moving vehicle?
Response. A skid steer loader designed, manufactured, and used in accordance with
Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) J1057 would be not be considered a powered
industrial truck under §1910.178. However, vertical mast skid steer loaders are designed as
powered industrial trucks meeting ANSI B56.6 Rough Terrain Forklift Trucks. These skid
steers would be considered powered industrial trucks under §1910.178.
Question 3. Is there a percentage of time that the removable forks must be used on the
vehicle to qualify for the Powered Industrial Truck Regulations?
Response. As stated above, the design of the vehicle is the determining factor, rather than
the time of use aspect.
Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this infor-
mation helpful. Please be aware that OSHA’s enforcement guidance is subject to periodic
review and clarification, amplification, or correction. Such guidance could also be affected
by subsequent rulemaking. In the future, should you wish to verify that the guidance pro-
vided herein remains current, you may consult OSHA’s website at http://www.osha.gov. If
you have any further questions, please feel free to contact the [Office of General Industry
Enforcement] at (202) 693-1850.
Sincerely,
Richard E. Fairfax, Director
[Directorate of Enforcement Programs]
[Corrected 6/2/2005]
2000/04/27
Standard Number: 1910.37; 1910.36(g)(2); 1910.36; 1910.36(b); 1910.24(d); 1910.1020
April 27, 2000
Mr. Gregory W. Faeth
President
Safety Consulting & Training Services
PO Box 1718
Fairfield, IA 52556
Dear Mr. Faeth:
Thank you for your December 28, 1999 to the Occupational Safety and Health Administra-
tion’s (OSHA’s) Directorate of Compliance Programs. Please be aware that this response
may not be applicable to any scenario not delineated within your original correspondence.
You had specific questions regarding Fixed Industrial Stairs, 29 CFR §1910.24, and the
redesignation of the Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records Standard, 29
CFR §1910.1020. Your questions and our reply follow.
Question #1: The OSHA [exit route] requirements, [§1910.36(g)(2)], state that the minimum
width of any way of exit access shall in no case be less than 28 inches and the OSHA stair
requirement, §1910.24(d), requires a minimum stair width of 22 inches. Is an employer out
of compliance with this [exit route] standard if the stairs are 22 inches in width?
Reply: Yes, if the stair is an [exit route] component (the exit access, the exit itself, or exit
discharge). All stairs, and other approved [exit route] components, must meet the Subpart
E, [Exit Routes] standards.1
Furthermore, in order to afford all occupants convenient facilitates for escape, the capacity
of an [exit route] (i.e., stair) for any occupied space must be appropriate to the individual
building or structure with due regard to the character of the occupancy; the number of
persons exposed; the fire protection available; and the height and type of construction of the
building or structure. [See paragraph 1910.36(b)(3).] The minimum width permitted for a
passageway used as an exit access is, according to [§1910.37(g)(2)], 28 inches; however,
most occupancies require additional width based upon the capacity of [exit route] require-
ments.
The 22 inch stair width requirement applies to both interior and exterior, fixed industrial
stairs (i.e., around machinery, tanks, and other equipment; to and from floors, platforms, or
pits) when they are used as described in the application paragraphs 1910.24(a) and (b).
Where these requirements overlap, the [Exit Routes] requirements would apply.
Question #2: Why did OSHA move §1910.20 to §1910.1020 without updating other 1910
standard references to §1910.1020? There are many references to §1910.20 and the only
corrected reference is in the newer Respiratory Protection, §1910.134, Standard. For
example, paragraph 1910.120(f)(8)(i) incorrectly directs a reader to §1910.20 instead of
§1910.1020.
Reply: In redesignating §1910.20 as §1910.1020, OSHA has simply moved the standard
from Subpart C to Subpart Z of the Part 1910 - Occupational Safety and Health Standards.
We have not changed or modified the standard language. Your observation correctly iden-
tifies OSHA’s omission to change the §1910.20 reference language. Our [Directorate of
Standards and Guidance] is currently working on a correction notice to rectify this incon-
sistency. This notice should be published in the Federal Register and become effective this
year.
Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this infor-
mation helpful. Please be aware that the enforcement guidance contained in this response
represents the views of OSHA at the time the letter was written based on the facts of an
individual case, question, or scenario and is subject to periodic review and clarification,
amplification, or correction. It could also be affected by subsequent rulemaking; past inter-
pretations may no longer be applicable. In the future, should you wish to verify that the
guidance provided herein remains current, you may consult OSHA’s website at http://
www.osha.gov. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact the [Office of
General Industry Enforcement] at (202) 693-1850.
Sincerely,
Richard E. Fairfax, Director
[Directorate of Enforcement Programs]
[Corrected 2/4/2004]
1
The source for the performance-oriented standard is the National Fire Protection Asso-
ciation Life Safety Code (NFPA 101-1970); it is current OSHA’s policy to use this consensus
standard as a reference source for clarification purposes. In the past, OSHA has used the
Life Safety Code (the Code) as an aid in interpreting Subpart E and we intend to continue
to rely on the NFPA Life Safety Code (NFPA 101-2000) and other consensus standards as
guidance in implementing performance-oriented requirements.
[This document was edited on 02/05/2004 to strike information that no longer reflects
current OSHA policy. 29 CFR 1910 Subpart E was revised on November 7, 2002 and
incorporates compliance with NFPA 101-2000 at 1910.35.]
2000/08/01
Standard Number: 1926.451(c)(1)(iii); 1926.451(c)(2); 1926.451(c)(2)(i); 1926.451(f)(3);
1926.451(f)(7); 1926.450
August 1, 2000
Mr. Donald J. Kemp
Hardy Construction Company
P.O. Box 1203
Billings, MT 59103
Subject: Scaffold Foundation and Competent Person Knowledge, Training and Inspecting,
1926.450, 1926.451(c)(1)(iii), 1926.451(c)(2), 1926.451(c)(2)(i), 1926.451(f)(3),
1926.451(f)(7)
Dear Mr. Kemp:
This is in response to your letter dated January 28, 2000, addressed to the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration requesting an interpretation of the scaffold standard, 29
CFR 1926 Subpart L. Specifically, your questions deal with the following issues: what is
considered a “firm foundation” for a scaffold, and who is responsible for determining the
adequacy of the foundation?
Question 1: Section 1926.451(c)(2) states: “supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,
and uprights shall bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate foundation.” OSHA’s
Directive Number CPL 2-1.23 states: “A concrete slab would be considered a firm founda-
tion, and therefore mud sills would not be necessary.” What is the definition of “other
adequate foundation?” What are some of the other options for providing an adequate firm
foundation?
Answer: An adequate foundation is one that, like base plates on mud sills, will prevent the
scaffold from settling into the ground. The purpose of the mud sill under the scaffold base
plate is to uniformly distribute the scaffold load over a larger area than that distributed by the
base plate alone, thereby reducing the loading on the ground beneath the base plates. The
scaffold baseplates and mudsills increase the area where the downward forces of the
scaffold are transmitted. The scaffold load is transferred from the uprights to the base plates
and then to the mud sills or other adequate foundation from the scaffold legs, which must
show minimal or negligible settlement under a full scaffold loading to be adequate.
The standard recognizes that certain foundations may be of adequate firmness to support
a scaffold without the use of mud sills. Generally, the adequacy of a foundation to support
a scaffold cannot be determined in the abstract because of the numerous factors which may
exist at a work site. Concrete is the lone exception to this rule, which, because of its
structural properties and strength, OSHA has determined constitutes a firm foundation.
Section 1926.451(c)(2)(i) goes on to require that: “footings shall be level, sound, rigid, and
capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement.” The preamble
to Subpart L (volume 61 of the Federal Register at page 46043, August 30, 1996) states:
“Every scaffold must stand on a firm footing if it is to withstand the load that employees,
equipment and materials place on it.” In short, an adequate foundation is one that supports
the load of the supported scaffold, materials and workers without collapse or shifting of one
component or the entire scaffold.
Daily site conditions of scaffold footing can change with the temperature, rain, snow, etc. It
is important to plan the erection, use and dismantling of the scaffold to address all possible
conditions including the site’s soil conditions.
Question 2: Would soil compacted to 96 - 99.9% density, then frozen in the cold of winter
be considered adequate? What about cold asphalt paving (in winter)? Hot asphalt paving (in
summer)? Wood decking? Compacted gravel roads?
Answer: As mentioned previously a site’s conditions and soil types have varying degrees
of load bearing ability. Also, the load bearing ability of the materials you mention varies.
Therefore, it is impossible to provide exact answers under the conditions you propose
because of the multitude of other variables that may exist. We discuss some of the problems
in each of your examples below. In all cases a competent person must inspect and approve
the foundation (daily).
a. Compacted Soils & Then Frozen - Compacted soils, as with all soils, swell and heave
due to moisture content or water contained within the soil. This creates a dangerous
situation during the freeze/thaw cycle (which can occur in the course of a day) causing
the soil to swell or settle and may not result in a level rigid footing. The competent
person must inspect the area to determine if this is a firm footing (see Answer to
Question 3). Then this must be inspected when conditions change, such as sunny
conditions, warming temperatures, etc.
b. Cold asphalt paving (winter) - Asphalt has minimal compressive strength, even when
cold, and especially when applied. By itself it is not normally a useable foundation
material.
c. Hot asphalt paving (summer) - This type of asphalt (top coat) is soft when placed and
then compacted with rollers. It is generally applied as a thin coat over a base coat and
takes several days to achieve its designed strength. Only the base coat gives the
asphalt compressive strength.1
d. Wood decking - This may lend itself for use as a foundation. However, an evaluation of
the deck for its maximum allowable loading would be required, since the decking or
deck structure could fail under a full scaffold load. The competent person would need
to know the individual scaffold base plate loading and if each one is below the maxi-
mum allowable deck loading.
A light weight supported scaffold could be used on wood decking when the competent
person has determined the structure would support the scaffold and its entire load.
e. Compacted Gravel Roads - This type of road surface may have adequate strength but
the material does not provide a smooth surface. Additionally, there is no material
cohesion; during a storm the material can wash away under the scaffold base plates.
In each of the examples cited, some type of settlement or displacement could occur when
used without mud sills. The foundation where the scaffold would be erected must be evalu-
ated in the pre-job planning. This determination is extremely important to the erection, use
and dismantling of the scaffold. The determination must be made by a competent person
with the knowledge of the type of scaffold, the expected live and dead loads, and the
weather conditions for the area.
Question 3: Who is responsible for determining whether a foundation is adequate? What
qualifications must that person have?
Answer: Under §1926.451(c)(1)(iii), the employer must have a designated competent per-
son make this determination. A competent person is defined in §1926.450 as one who is
capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards in the surroundings or work in the
surroundings or working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous to
employees, and who has authorization to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate
them. With respect to the adequacy of foundations, the competent person must be knowl-
edgeable about foundation surfaces and soils, and able to recognize conditions such as a
soil wash under a scaffold leg.
Question 4: How do employees get to be competent to determine an adequate scaffold
foundation?
Answer: The competent person is designated by the employer and has the authorization to
take prompt corrective measures to eliminate hazards. In making that determination, the
employer should inquire into the individual’s work credentials and experience. The pre-
amble to Subpart L (volume 61 of the Federal Register at page 46,059, Aug. 30, 1996) gives
the following example of what is required to become a “competent person” on scaffolding.
A ’competent person’ for the purpose of this provision must have had specific training
in and be knowledgable about the structural integrity of scaffolds as well as the degree
of maintenance needed to maintain them. The competent person must also be able to
evaluate the effects of occurrences such as, a dropped load, or a truck backing into a
support leg that could damage a scaffold. In addition, the competent person must be
knowledgeable about the requirements of this standard. A competent person must
have training or knowledge in these areas in order to identify and correct hazards
encountered in scaffold work.
In the situation you have described, the competent person must be able to assess the load
of employees, equipment and materials placed on the scaffold’s foundation. While an engi-
neering degree is not a prerequisite, that assessment normally requires some technical
skills, and the competent person making that determination would have to have those skills.
If you need additional information, please contact us by fax at: U.S. Department of Labor,
OSHA, Directorate of Construction, Office of Construction Standards and Guidance, fax #
202-693-1689. You can also contact us by mail at the above office, Room N3468, 200
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210, although there will be a delay in our
receiving correspondence by mail.
Sincerely,
Russell B. Swanson, Director
Directorate of Construction
[Corrected 6/2/2005]
2002/04/18
Standard Number: 1910.151(c)
April 18, 2002
Mr. Paul Hagmann
5877 Sand Drive
West Bend, Wisconsin 53095
Dear Mr. Hagmann:
Thank you for your October 2, 2001 letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Adminis-
tration’s (OSHA’s) Directorate of Compliance Programs. You requested clarification of
OSHA standard 29 CFR 1910.151 (Medical Services and First Aid). This letter constitutes
OSHA’s interpretation only of the requirements discussed and may not be applicable to any
questions not delineated within your original correspondence. Your questions have been
restated below for clarity. We apologize for the delay in your response.
Question 1: Will OSHA cite a facility for not following the recommendations as stated in
ANSI standard Z358.1-1990? Specifically, will an OSHA inspector cite a facility for not
supplying tempered water to an emergency eyewash and shower?
Reply: Paragraph (c) of 29 CFR 1910.151 requires the employer to provide suitable facili-
ties for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body when employees may be exposed
to injurious corrosive materials. ANSI standards become mandatory OSHA standards only
when, and if, they are adopted by OSHA; ANSI Z358.1 was not adopted by OSHA. In
comparison with the OSHA standard at 29 CFR 1910.151(c), however, ANSI Z358.1 pro-
vides detailed information regarding the installation and operation of emergency eyewash
and shower equipment. OSHA, therefore, has often referred employers to ANSI Z358.1 as
a source of guidance for protecting employees who may be exposed to injurious corrosive
materials.
As you may know, 29 CFR 1910.151(c) does not provide specific instruction regarding the
installation and operation of emergency eyewash and shower equipment. Therefore, it is the
employer’s responsibility to assess the particular conditions related to the eyewash/shower
unit, such as water temperature, to ensure that the eyewash/shower unit provides suitable
protection against caustic chemicals/materials to which employees may be exposed.
Question 2: Would the citation (in the situation described above) be written under 29 CFR
1910.151 or under the General Duty Clause, Section 5(a)(1)?
Reply: Since OSHA has a standard related to drenching/flushing facilities, any citation for
the failure to provide suitable drenching/flushing facilities must be issued pursuant to 29
CFR 1910.151(c).
Question 3: While reading product literature on emergency shower units, it stated that 30
gpm was fairly standard among drench showers; are there specific requirements for the rate
of flow for an emergency eyewash or shower unit?
Reply: OSHA has adopted no specific requirements regarding flow rates for drenching/
flushing facilities. ANSI Z358.1 provides detailed information regarding the installation and
operation of emergency eyewash and shower equipment, including the requirements for
flow rate. Section 4.1 of ANSI Z358.1 specifies that emergency shower heads shall be
capable of delivering a minimum of 75.7 liters per minute (20 gpm) of flushing fluid at a
velocity low enough to be non-injurious to the user. A sufficient volume of flushing fluid shall
be available to supply the flow rate for a minimum fifteen minute period.
Question 4: If OSHA is using the ANSI standard Z358.1-1990 for the basis of the OSHA
standard 1910.151, doesn’t OSHA need to make the ANSI standard available to the general
public and/or industry? Where can I obtain a copy of the ANSI standard Z358.1-1990?
Reply: You may obtain copies of ANSI standards by contacting ANSI at:
American National Standards Institute, Inc.
11 West 42nd Street
New York, New York 10036
Phone: (212) 642-4900
Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this infor-
mation helpful. OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our
interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circum-
stances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes
OSHA’s interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance
may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance
in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult
OSHA’s website at http://www.osha.gov. If you have any further questions, please feel free
to contact the Office of General Industry Compliance Assistance at (202) 693-1850.
Sincerely,
Richard E. Fairfax, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs
2005/12/02
Standard Number: 1910.146(b); 1910.146(c)(7); 1910.146(c)(7)(i)
December 2, 2005
Ms. Laura Johnson
Assistant Director
Iowa - Illinois Safety Council
8013 Douglas Avenue
Urbandale, Iowa 50322-2453
Dear Ms. Johnson:
Thank you for your August 2, 2005, letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Adminis-
tration’s (OSHA) Peoria Area Office. Your letter has been referred to the Directorate of
Enforcement Program’s (DEP) Office of General Industry Enforcement for an answer to
your questions regarding compliance with OSHA’s Permit-required Confined Spaces Stan-
dard, 29 CFR 1910.146. Your scenario and questions have been restated below for clarity.
Scenario: Employees must enter a permit-required confined space (PRCS) to perform
maintenance work on mechanical apparatus. The enclosure is a circular concrete wall
approximately 10 feet in height, tapering outward to the top and 25 feet in diameter. The
enclosure sits on top of a concrete cooling tower structure and houses a large fan. The top
of the enclosure is completely open to the atmosphere. Below the enclosure (approximately
10 feet) inside of the cooling tower is the “Fill Pack” through which the cooling tower water
is distributed. This fill pack is an open cellular media through a hatchway on the side of the
enclosure to access catwalks along the drive shaft and to a platform at the main gearbox in
the center of the enclosure. Complete control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) is per-
formed externally before entry is allowed. The only reason this confined space is considered
a permit space is because of the mechanical hazards of the fan blades and drive shaft. It
is the intent of the employer to reclassify the space to a non-permit confined space following
the regulations in 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(7) once the lockout/tagout is in place and tests to
confirm all other hazards are eliminated are completed. Atmospheric testing of the confined
space prior to entry occasionally indicates what appear to be erroneous readings for LFL
and H2S due to sensitivities of the atmospheric monitoring equipment sensors in the high
humidity area; however no sources for flammables or hydrogen sulfide exist within the
facility.
Question 1: Please provide an interpretation of potential as it is used in 29 CFR
1910.146(c)(7)(i) as it relates to hazardous atmospheres in the definitions for “Non-permit
confined space” and “Permit-required confined space” in 1910.146(b). Specifically, does a
background or ambient reading of flammable gas, below the specified 10 percent LFL,
constitute potential even when there is no source or when all sources have been isolated?
Reply: In your scenario you state that the reason the confined space is a permit space is
due to the mechanical hazards of the fan blades and drive shaft. If these are the only
hazards or potential hazards within the permit space, then why is testing of the space
conducted? Further you state that the instrumentation may give erroneous readings due to
humidity. Any erroneous readings would need to be verified as erroneous prior to entry into
the space. We would recommend that you contact the equipment manufacturer for technical
assistance in determining how to eliminate this problem. Perhaps a different type of equip-
ment could be used to atmospherically test the space during high humid conditions.
Question 2: Does documentation from a previous PRCS entry into this space that shows
that a low level LFL (5 percent) reading was present constitute potential? If so, does this
historical record continue to constitute potential even after all processes and procedures are
evaluated and it is determined that there is no source of flammables?
Reply: If there is no source of the flammable including residual contamination, then the
potential would be removed. However, any flammable which is brought into the space could
trigger a potential atmospheric hazard.
Question 3: If, subsequent to the tests that revealed the low level LFL, evaluations deter-
mine that there is no source of flammables and repeated tests showing zero LFL are
conducted, can it be accepted that there is no potential for a hazardous flammable atmo-
sphere? At what point and by what additional methods can it be accepted there is no
potential?
Reply: If the source has been truly removed, i.e. no piping, containers, residual, etc., and
the flammable material is not brought into the space by any mechanism, then there would
not be a potential atmospheric hazard for that material.
Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this infor-
mation helpful. OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards, and regulations. Our
interpretations letters explain the requirements, and how they apply to particular circum-
stances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes
OSHA’s interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance
may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. In addition, from time to time we update our
guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can
consult OSHA’s website at http://www.osha.gov. If you have any further questions, please
feel free to contact the Office of General Industry Enforcement at (202) 693-1850.
Sincerely,
Richard E. Fairfax, Director
Directorate of Enforcement Programs
2006/05/07
Standard Number: 1910.219(m)
May 7, 2006
Mr. William K. Principe
Constangy, Brooks and Smith, LLC
Suite 2400
230 Peachtree Street, N.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303-1557
Dear Mr. Principe:
Thank you for your August 28, 2003 letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Adminis-
tration’s (OSHA’s) Office of General Industry Enforcement (GIE). Please be aware that this
response may not be applicable to any situations not delineated within your original corre-
spondence. You had specific questions regarding §1910.219(m).
Questions below have been restated for clarity.
Question: Does a guard that is held firmly in place without the use of screws or bolts, and
cannot slide out of place, or be inadvertently jostled out of place, comply with the require-
ment in §1910.219(m) that guards on mechanical power transmission apparatus be
securely fastened?
Response: Yes. The guards may be fastened by any secure method that prevents the
guard from being inadvertently dislodged or removed, including, but not limited to, such
means as screws, bolts, wing nuts and lock fasteners. OSHA would allow guards that could
be easily removed to allow maintenance or repair activities in the most efficient manner,
provided that the guard can be attached securely in place to protect employees once the
maintenance or repair activities are completed.
Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this infor-
mation helpful. Please be aware that the enforcement guidance contained in this response
represents the views of OSHA at the time the letter was written based on the facts of an
individual case, question, or scenario and is subject to periodic review and clarification,
amplification, or correction. It could also be affected by subsequent rulemaking; past inter-
pretations may no longer be applicable. In the future, should you wish to verify that the
guidance provided herein remains current, you may consult OSHA’s website at http://
www.osha.gov. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact the Office of
General Industry Enforcement at (202) 693-1850.
Sincerely,
Richard E. Fairfax, Director
Directorate of Enforcement Programs
2006/08/25
Standard Number: 1910.147; 1910.147(a)(2)(ii); 1910.147(b); 1910.147(f)(1); 1910.212;
1910.212(a)(2); 1910.219; 1910.219(m)(1); 1910.263; 1910.263(l)(9)(ii)
August 25, 2006
Ms. Donna L. Pierce
Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C.
1000 Tallan Building
Two Union Square
Chattanooga, TN 37402
Dear Ms. Pierce:
Thank you for your March 9, 2006, letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Adminis-
tration’s (OSHA) Directorate of Enforcement Programs. You stated that you represent a
company in the baking industry with production facilities in different states and have ques-
tions regarding Federal OSHA’s Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout or LOTO) and
Bakery equipment standards, 29 CFR §§ 1910.147 and 1910.263, respectively.1 Your sce-
narios, paraphrased questions and our replies follow.
Scenario 1: The company has a piece of equipment that regulates temperature and humid-
ity. This equipment uses a long serpentine conveyor, approximately 61 feet long, four feet
wide and eight feet high with two levels of interlocked doors on each side. The conveyor is
composed of many individual chain driven trays that transfer the product through the equip-
ment. Periodically, the doors must be opened to observe whether the equipment is
operating properly. When the doors are opened to make this observation, safety interlocks
are by-passed, but the observer is trained never to allow a body part to pass the plane
where the door would be if closed. The observer only monitors the equipment to ensure it
is functioning properly. The observer is prohibited from performing any adjustments, repairs
or cleaning until the shutdown/lockout provisions of §1910.147 have been met.
Question 1: Is this procedure appropriate as a minor servicing exception, 29 CFR
1910.147(a)(2)(ii) or otherwise?
Question 2: If this procedure is not acceptable, would it be acceptable to have a safety
interlock override the procedure controlled through a mechanic-controlled key or some
other procedure?
Question 3: Would it be acceptable to perform the observation if the internal guards were
installed [such] that [the barrier] would prevent contact with the internal areas of the equip-
ment?
Reply: While it is not possible to conclusively determine the answer to your question without
observing this particular piece of equipment and considering the manner in which it is
situated and used, as a result of the employees’ positioning with respect to the door open-
ing, it is likely that they would be exposed to hazardous energy, such as moving parts.2
The task you describe would involve an employee observing whether the equipment is
operating properly. This activity would be considered inspecting the equipment, and there-
fore would be considered Servicing and/or maintenance as defined at 29 CFR 1910.147(b).
Although LOTO applies to servicing and maintenance, minor adjustments may be exempt
from the LOTO if the inspection process is routine, repetitive and integral to the use of the
conveyor for production purposes provided that the work is performed using alternative
measures which provide effective protection. This exemption determination must be made
on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the §1910.147(a)(2)(ii) note. As detailed in the
inspection procedure you outline,thesafety interlocks are bypassed when the doors are
opened. As a result of this bypass, LOTO would apply.
Aside from the minor servicing exception, an employer can avoid the requirements of the
LOTO standard through the use of an alternative method which eliminates employee expo-
sure to servicing and maintenance hazards — i.e., through the use of guarding methods that
meet the requirements of Machinery and Machine Guarding, 29 CFR Part 1910, Subpart O,
and Bakery Equipment, §1910.263. The internal guards you reference would satisfy this
exception if they complied with these standards.
With respect to your second question concerning the use of mechanics keys, we do not
have enough information to provide a response at this time.
Scenario 2: Another piece of equipment puts two cookies together after depositing a layer
of crème between them. This machine has to be timed perfectly to ensure proper assembly
of cookies. To successfully adjust the timing of the equipment, it must be operating when the
adjustments are made. The doors on the equipment are locked, but do not have safety
interlocks. The equipment does have internal guards to prevent insertion of fingers or hands
into the hazard area while allowing employees to make the required adjustments. Employ-
ees also occasionally use extended air nozzles to blow off excess product. Employees are
trained on the timing and cleaning processes, the safety features built into the equipment
and processes, and the potential hazards that could be created if they bypass the internal
safety features. Employees follow 1910.212, the guarding standard, but not 1910.147.
Question 4: Are these design features and safety practices satisfactory as a minor servic-
ing exception, 29 CFR 1910.147(a)(2)(ii), or otherwise?
Reply: The adjustment of a machine component’s timing mechanisms constitutes machine
servicing activity, which is covered by the LOTO standard if an employee(s) is exposed to
hazardous energy. See §1910.147(a)(2)(ii)(A) and (B). As described in the previous reply,
there is an exception for minor servicing activities which take place during normal produc-
tion operations, provided that the work is performed using alternative measures which
provide effective protection. See the 29 CFR 1910.147(a)(2)(ii) note.
In your scenario, the LOTO standard would not apply if the minor servicing exemption
applies or if the internal machine guarding method eliminates employee exposure to haz-
ardous mechanical (kinetic) energy. If this is not the case, then employee protection must
be provided, as previously described, when energization is essential (e.g., timing adjust-
ment work) — i.e., pursuant to the §1910.147(f)(1) equipment testing and positioning
provisions.
Question 5: if these design features and safety practices are not satisfactory, what stan-
dards apply?
Reply: The Machinery and machine guarding , Subpart O,standards apply to Normal pro-
duction operations — i.e., the utilization of a machine or piece of equipment to perform its
intended production functions. Activities that are necessary to prepare or maintain a piece
of equipment are not considered normal production operations and are defined as Servicing
and/or maintenance. See §1910.147(b). Section1910.147 applies to the control of hazard-
ous energy during servicing and/or maintenance of the equipment. However, it is important
to note that the Bakery equipment standard, §1910.263, also addresses the design, instal-
lation, operation, and maintenance of machinery and equipment used within a bakery,
including machine guarding requirements contained in paragraph (c).
Scenario 3: The company has a third piece of equipment with a flight chain with ears every
four or five links to ensure proper spacing and movement of the product. The chain runs in
a channel across the top of the machine and then returns back into the underside of the
machine. There are chain adjustments in the underside of the machine that require moni-
toring or adjusting occasionally. The company has trained its personnel to override the
safety switch and observe the equipment while it is running in order to determine whether
the equipment is working properly. When repairs or adjustments are actually made, lockout/
tagout (energy control procedure) is applied.
Question 6: Is this an acceptable practice?
Reply: Refer to the first reply.
Question 7: Does it make a difference how the safety switch on the guard is overridden or
if the guard is bolted shut without electrical interlocks3 that would require the employee to
use a tool to remove the door?
Reply: With respect to performance-oriented machine guarding requirements, guard design
and construction must be of such design and strength to protect workers from the machine
hazards. Guards must be affixed to the machine, where possible, and they may be fastened
by any method (e.g., bolts) that prevents the guard from being inadvertently dislodged or
removed. See §§ 1910.212(a)(2) and 1910.219(m)(1).
Scenario 4: A conveyor consists of several rollers that are four feet long and three inches
in diameter that are covered by sheet metal guards. To properly clean these rollers, the
equipment must be running. The guards are removed, and the rollers are sprayed using a
water hose as an extended tool.
Question 8: Is this an acceptable practice?
Reply: No, if the guard removal exposes the employee(s) to hazardous energy associated
with machine operation, such as moving gears, sprockets, V-belts or ingoing nip points.
Question 9: Does it matter if the equipment remains on the production line while it is
cleaned or removed to a different location for the cleaning process?
Reply: It is difficult to answer this question with the information you provided. However, the
options discussed above apply. Another option would be to lock out or tag out the conveyor,
remove the rollers and clean them in a safe area. Thereafter, the clean rollers could then be
re-installed, LOTO removed and the conveyor returned to normal production operation.
Scenario 5: Standard 1910.263(l)(9)(ii) provides that all safety devices on ovens shall be
inspected at intervals of not less than twice a month by an especially appointed, properly
instructed bakery employee, and not less than once a year by representatives of the oven
manufacturers.4
Question 10: Does the bi-weekly inspection mean that the employee must test the safety
devices in order to ensure each is functioning properly or may the employee visually inspect
the safety devices for changes from the previous inspection?
Reply: OSHA’s present Bakery equipment requirements are based upon the American
Standard Safety Code for Bakery equipment (ANSI Z50.1-1947), which included most of the
source standard’s Safety Device Testing provisions (Section 13.9.2). The OSHA standard
retained many of the source standard’s inspection requirements; however the Agency did
not include any specific testing requirements in this provision. See §1910.263(l)(9)(i) and
(ii). Therefore, the current OSHA standard does not explicitly require safety device testing.
However, these §1910.263(l)(9) general provisions for bakery oven inspections and main-
tenance are performance-oriented requirements that are intended to ensure the proper
operation of safety devices (controls). In order to prescribe a procedure that is necessary to
keep the oven safety devices functioning properly, an employer needs to base their inspec-
tion program (e.g., visual inspection requirements) on recognized and generally accepted
engineering experience, such as, but not limited to, the:
• Original equipment manufacturer (OEM) specifications/instructions; and
• Recognized and good engineering practice — e.g., Standard for Ovens and Fur-
naces, ANSI/NFPA 86-2003.
Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this infor-
mation helpful. OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards, and regulations. Our
interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circum-
stances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes
OSHA’s interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance
may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance
in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult
OSHA’s website at www.osha.gov. If you have any further questions, please feel free to
contact the Office of General Industry Enforcement at (202) 693-1850.
Sincerely,
Richard E. Fairfax, Director
Directorate of Enforcement Programs
1
Twenty-six (26) states have OSHA-approved State Plans and have adopted their own
standards and enforcement policies. For the most part, these States adopt standards that
are identical to Federal OSHA. However, some States may have adopted different stan-
dards applicable to this topic or may have different enforcement policies that are more
specific and/or more stringent.
2
Simply training the employee to stay away from hazardous machine components is not
effective alternative employee protection
3
While properly designed and maintained interlocks generally provide effective machine
guarding, §1910.212 does not require the use of interlocks.
4
The OSHA bakery equipment standard, §1910.263(l)(9)(ii) ), specifies that the annual
inspections of ovens shall be conducted by representatives of the oven manufacturer.
OSHA considers representatives of the oven manufacturer to be qualified persons who are
knowledgeable of the various safety considerations and of the safe operational character-
istics of the equipment. They may or may not be employees for the oven manufacturer.
Refer to the April 24, 1998, letter to the American Bakers Cooperative, Inc. that is posted on
the OSHA public webpage for details: http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/
owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=22573
2007/01/23
Standard Number: 1910.151(b)
January 23, 2007
Rikki Pottebaum
Affirmed Medical Services
5591 Autumn Wynd Lane
Milford, Ohio 45150
Dear Ms. Pottebaum:
This is in further response to your November 10, 2005 letter to the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) requesting assistance in the interpretation of OSHA’s
requirements regarding locked first aid cabinets in the work place.
To answer your question succinctly, yes, first aid cabinets can be locked; however, they
must be readily accessible in the event of an emergency. Locking the cabinet may limit
accessibility. Title 29 CFR 1910.151(b) states: “In the absence of an infirmary, clinic, or
hospital in near proximity to the workplace which is used for the treatment of all injured
employees, a person or persons shall be adequately trained to render first aid. Adequate
first aid supplies shall be readily available.”
Employers may elect not to provide first aid services if all such services will be provided by
a hospital, infirmary, or clinic in near proximity to the workplace. If the employer has persons
who are trained in first aid, then adequate first aid supplies must be readily available for use.
These supplies need to be stored in a convenient area available for emergency access.
However, if OSHA found that an employer was relying on first aid services not provided by
a clinic, infirmary, or hospital and adequate first aid supplies were not available when
needed, then the employer would be in violation of 29 CFR 1910.151(b).
I hope you find this information helpful. Please be aware that OSHA’s enforcement guid-
ance is subject to periodic review and clarification, amplification, or correction. Such
guidance could also be affected by subsequent rulemaking. In the future, should you wish
to verify that the guidance provided herein remains current, you may consult OSHA’s
website at http://www.osha.gov If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact
the Office of General Industry Enforcement at (202) 693-1850.
Sincerely,
Richard E. Fairfax, Director
Directorate of Enforcement Programs
2007/02/02
Standard Number: 1910.151; 1910.151(b)
February 2, 2007
Leanne D. Cress
P. O. Box 223
Palomar Mountain, CA 92060
Dear Ms. Cress:
Your November 23, 2006 letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) has been referred to the Directorate of Enforcement Programs for response. This
letter constitutes OSHA’s interpretation only of the requirements discussed and may not be
applicable to any question or scenario not delineated within your original correspondence.
You asked if it was mandatory for all workplaces to provide a first aid kit.
Title 29 CFR 1910.151(b) states: “In the absence of an infirmary, clinic, or hospital in near
proximity to the workplace which is used for treatment of all injured employees, a person or
persons shall be adequately trained to render first aid. Adequate first aid supplies shall be
readily available.”
Employers may elect not to provide first aid services if all such services will be provided by
a hospital, infirmary, or clinic in near proximity to the workplace. If the employer has persons
who are trained in first aid, then adequate first aid supplies must be readily available for use.
Therefore, employers are required to provide first aid supplies that are most appropriate to
respond to incidents at their workplaces. OSHA allows employers to provide first aid sup-
plies specific to the needs of their workplace.
Although we have provided our interpretation of the federal standard, twenty-six states,
including California, operate their own OSHA-approved occupational safety and health
programs. These State-plan States adopt and enforce their own standards, which may have
different requirements from the federal standards regarding medical services and supplies.
The California Department of Industrial Relations (Cal-OSHA) administers the state plan
program. Cal-OSHA standards are accessible on the state’s website — http://
www.dir.ca.gov/occupational_safety.html. If you would like more information about
California workplace safety and health regulations, the address is as follows:
John Rea, Acting Director
California Department of Industrial Relations
1515 Clay Street, Suite 1901
Oakland, California 94612
(415) 703-5050
FAX (415) 703-5058
Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this infor-
mation helpful. Please be aware that OSHA’s enforcement guidance is subject to periodic
review and clarification, amplification, or correction. Such guidance could also be affected
by subsequent rulemaking. In the future, should you wish to verify that the guidance pro-
vided herein remains current, you may consult OSHA’s website at http://www.osha.gov. If
you have any further questions, please feel free to contact the Office of General Industry
Enforcement at (202) 693-1850.
Sincerely,
Richard E. Fairfax, Director
Directorate of Enforcement Programs
2007/11/28
Standard Number: 1926; 1926.500(a)(2)(vii); 1926; 1926.1053(b); 1926.1053(b)(3);
1926.1053(b)(4); 1926.1053(b)(13); 1926 Subpart M; 1926 Subpart X
November 28, 2007
Mr. Robert S. Beisel
Safety Consultant
Project Best, Inc.
21 Armory Drive
Wheeling, WV 26003-6396
Re: Whether OSHA requirements prohibit working from a portable stepladder and, if not,
whether fall protection is required. 29 CFR 1926.1053(b).
Dear Mr. Beisel:
This is in response to your letter submitted April 27, 2006 to the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA). Your inquiry addresses the use of portable stepladders and
fall protection. We apologize for the long delay in responding.
We have paraphrased your question as follows:
Question (1): Does 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4) prohibit an employee from working from a
portable stepladder?
Answer (1): Title 29 CFR 1926.1053(b), Use, provides:
***
(3) Ladders shall not be loaded beyond the maximum intended load for which they were
built, nor beyond their manufacturer’s rated capacity.
(4) Ladders shall be used only for the purpose for which they were designed.
***
(13) The top or top step of a stepladder shall not be used as a step.
***
There are no OSHA construction standards that specifically prohibit an employee from
working from a portable stepladder. However, the use of a portable ladder must comply with
the Use requirements quoted above. If working from a portable stepladder was inconsistent
with any of these provisions, such use would be prohibited. Because of the wide variety of
circumstances and ladder designs, it is not possible for us to state, as a general matter,
whether working from a portable ladder would be consistent or inconsistent with any of
these provisions.
Question (2): Is fall protection required while working from a portable stepladder?
Answer (2): In 29 CFR Part 1926 Subpart M (Fall protection), Section 1926.500(a)(2)(vii)
provides:
Requirements relating to fall protection for employees working on stairways and lad-
ders are provided in Subpart X . . .
***
There is no provision in Subpart X that requires fall protection for an employee while working
from a portable stepladder. However, if the employee will be on a surface prior to ascending
or upon exiting the ladder for which another Subpart in 1926 requires fall protection, then fall
protection would be required at such times. General requirements for fall protection can be
found at Subpart M of 29 CFR Part 1926, while requirements specific to a particular activity
or equipment can be found at its applicable Subpart in 29 CFR Part 1926.
If you need any additional information, please contact us by fax at: U.S. Department of
Labor, Directorate of Construction Office of Construction Standards and Guidance, (202)
693-1689. You may also contact us by mail at the above office, Room N3468, 200 Consti-
tution Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210; although there may be a delay in our
receiving correspondence by mail.
Sincerely,
Steven F. Witt,
Directorate of Construction
2008/04/14
Standard Number: 1910.178; 1910.178(k)(3)
April 14, 2008
Mr. Milton Pleasant
Alcoa Inc.
Reynolds Wrap Center
3041 Wilson Ave.
Louisville, KY 40211
Dear Mr. Pleasant:
Thank you for your letter of September 13, 2007, to the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration’s (OSHA’s) regional office in Atlanta, Georgia. Your letter has been for-
warded to OSHA’s Directorate of Enforcement Programs (DEP). You had a question
concerning OSHA’s Powered industrial trucks standard, 29 CFR 1910.178, and the use of
jack stands in the stabilization of semi-trailers. Your paraphrased question and our response
follow.
Question: Are two jack stands, placed one on each side of the uncoupled end of a semi-
trailer, sufficient to support the trailer and prevent it from upending during loading and
unloading using powered industrial trucks? Is one jack stand placed in the middle of the
uncoupled trailer sufficient?
Response: OSHA’s Powered industrial trucks standard, at 29 CFR 1910.178(k)(3), states
that “[f]ixed jacks may be necessary to support a semi-trailer and prevent upending during
loading or unloading when the trailer is not coupled to a tractor.” OSHA’s standard does not
specify a particular type of jack, nor the number and placement of such jacks. As noted in
the March 19, 1991, letter to Mr. Thomas Wheeler (enclosed), the language in this para-
graph is advisory rather than mandatory. However, when using portable jacks to support
semi-trailers, OSHA strongly recommends following both the trailer and the jack manufac-
turer’s instructions on the appropriate number and placement of these jacks. Additional
guidance on the loading and unloading of trailers with powered industrial trucks may be
found on OSHA’s website at
http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/poweredindustrialtrucks/loading_unloading.html.
You also enclosed a manufacturer’s brochure depicting a particular type of portable jack. As
you may know, OSHA does not approve, endorse, or promote any particular product, or
protective measure.
For your information, the State of Kentucky administers its own occupational safety and
health program under a plan approved and monitored by Federal OSHA. Therefore,
employers in the State of Kentucky must comply with State occupational safety and health
requirements. As a condition of plan approval, States are required to adopt and enforce
occupational safety and health standards that are at least as effective as those promulgated
by Federal OSHA. For the most part, Kentucky standards are identical to the Federal
standards, although Kentucky does have some additional standards with different require-
ments. If you would like further information regarding Kentucky’s occupational safety and
health requirements, you may contact the Kentucky Department of Labor at the following
address:
Steve Morrison, Executive Director
Office of Occupational Safety and Health
1047 U.S. Highway 127 S.
Suite 4
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-3070
Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this infor-
mation helpful. OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards, and regulations. Our
interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circum-
stances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes
OSHA’s interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance
may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance
in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you may consult
OSHA’s website at http://www.osha.gov If you have any further questions, please feel free
to contact the OSHA Office of General Industry Enforcement at (202) 693-1850.
Sincerely,
Richard E. Fairfax, Director
Directorate of Enforcement Programs
2009/09/29
Standard Number: 1910.23; 1910.23(a)(2); 1910.27
September 29, 2009
MEMORANDUM REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS
FOR:
FROM: RICHARD E. FAIRFAX, DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT PROGRAMS
SUBJECT: Guarding of Access Openings to Fixed Ladders
The purpose of this memorandum is to clarify the requirements for guarding access open-
ings to fixed ladders. Differences in the regulatory text between paragraphs 1910.23(a)(2)
and 1910.23(c)(1) and silence on this issue in paragraph 1910.23(c)(2) and in the fixed
ladder standard at 1910.27 have led to some confusion.
Openings on platforms are regulated by different paragraphs of §1910.23. Paragraph
§1910.23(a) covers floor openings, including access openings at the edge of a platform.
Paragraph §1910.23(b) covers wall openings and wall holes. Paragraph §1910.23(c) covers
the edges of open-sided floors and platforms, but not the access openings at the edge of
the platform or through the floor.
The governing requirement for the guarding of ladderway floor openings and platforms is
paragraph 1910.23(a)(2):
Every ladderway floor opening or platform shall be guarded by a standard railing with
standard toeboard on all exposed sides (except at entrance to opening), with the
passage through the railing either provided with a swinging gate or so offset that a
person cannot walk directly into the opening.
This paragraph applies to ladders that extend to another working surface, even if the ladder
attaches to the edge of the working surface or the platform, since the opening at the ladder
access point is also a floor opening. It also applies to floor openings in runways and
catwalks. All ladderway floor openings or platforms must be protected by a standard railing
except at the entrance to the opening. The passage through the railing, however, must be
protected by a swinging gate or offset so that a person cannot walk directly into the opening.
Paragraph §1910.23(c)(1) requires a standard railing on all open-sided floors or platforms
4 feet or more above floor or ground level, except at entrances to ramps, stairways, or fixed
ladders. It describes where a standard railing is required and includes an exception for the
entrance to fixed ladders. This paragraph does not, however, exempt the passage through
the railing for platforms from being protected by a gate or offset as required in paragraph
1910.23(a)(2). The intent of the exemption in paragraph (c) was to allow other than a
standard, fixed, guardrail at the entrance to a fixed ladder. Required protection for the
access openings on runways and catwalks are also included in this paragraph.
Unguarded ladderway floor openings and unguarded ladderway entrances on all surfaces
should be cited under section 1910.23(a)(2).
If you need any additional information or clarification on this memorandum, please contact
the Office of General Industry Enforcement at (202) 693-1850.
Reserved
Glossaries
3/13 Glossaries–1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
2–Glossaries 3/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Chronic effect An adverse effect on the human body with symptoms that
develop slowly over a long period of time or which recur
frequently.
Chronic Long-term contact with a substance.
exposure
Combustible Able to catch on fire and burn.
Compliance A person trained and authorized by the Occupational Safety and
safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor to conduct
health officer inspections.
Confined space A space that: (1) Is large enough and so configured that an
employee can bodily enter and perform assigned work; (2) Has
limited or restricted means for entry or exit; and (3) Is not
designed for continuous employee occupancy.
Conjunctivitis Inflammation of the conjunctiva, the delicate membrane that lines
the eyelids and covers the eyeballs.
Cumulative (CTD) A disorder of the musculoskeletal and nervous system that
trauma disorder may be caused or aggravated by repetitive motions, forceful
exertions, vibration, mechanical compressions, sustained or
awkward postures, or by exposure to noise over extended
periods of time.
Dangerous An atmosphere that may expose employees to the risk of death,
atmosphere incapacitation, impairment of ability to self-rescue, injury, or acute
illness.
De minimus Violations of existing OSHA standards which have no direct or
immediate relationship to safety or health. Such violations of the
OSHA standards result in no penalty and no requirement for
abatement.
Dyspnea A sense of difficulty in breathing; shortness of breath.
Emergency A plan for a workplace, or parts thereof, describing what
action plan procedures the employer and employees must take to ensure
employee safety from fire or other emergencies.
Emergency An emergency spill or release refers to the after effects of an
release unintended release of hazardous, toxic, or explosive substances.
Employee An employee of an employer who is employed in a business of
his employer which affects commerce.
Employer A person engaged in a business affecting commerce who has
employees, but does not include the United States or any State
or political subdivision of a State.
3/13 Glossaries–3
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
4–Glossaries 3/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
First aid For the purposes of 29 CFR 1904, “first aid” means:
(A) Using a non-prescription medication at nonprescription
strength (for medications available in both prescription and non-
prescription form, a recommendation by a physician or other
licensed health care professional to use a non-prescription
medication at prescription strength is considered medical
treatment for recordkeeping purposes);
(B) Administering tetanus immunizations (other immunizations,
such as Hepatitis B vaccine or rabies vaccine, are considered
medical treatment);
(C) Cleaning, flushing or soaking wounds on the surface of the
skin;
(D) Using wound coverings such as bandages, Band-Aids®,
gauze pads, etc.; or using butterfly bandages or Steri-Strips™
(other wound closing devices such as sutures, staples, etc., are
considered medical treatment);
(E) Using hot or cold therapy;
(F) Using any non-rigid means of support, such as elastic
bandages, wraps, non-rigid back belts, etc. (devices with rigid
stays or other systems designed to immobilize parts of the body
are considered medical treatment for recordkeeping purposes);
(G) Using temporary immobilization devices while transporting an
accident victim (e.g., splints, slings, neck collars, back boards,
etc.);
(H) Drilling of a fingernail or toenail to relieve pressure, or
draining fluid from a blister;
(I) Using eye patches;
(J) Removing foreign bodies from the eye using only irrigation or
a cotton swab;
(K) Removing splinters or foreign material from areas other than
the eye by irrigation, tweezers, cotton swabs or other simple
means;
(L) Using finger guards;
(M) Using massages (physical therapy or chiropractic treatment
are considered medical treatment for recordkeeping purposes);
(N) Drinking fluids for relief of heat stress.
Flammable As defined in OSHA’s 1910.106 standard, a flammable liquid
liquid means any liquid having a flashpoint at or below 199.4°F (93°C).
Flammable liquids are divided into four categories.
3/13 Glossaries–5
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Flashpoint The minimum temperature at which a liquid gives off vapor within
a test vessel in sufficient concentration to form an ignitable
mixture with air near the surface of the liquid.
Floor hole An opening measuring less than 12 inches but more than one
inch in its least dimension, in any floor, platform, pavement, or
yard, through which materials but not persons may fall; such as a
belt hole, pipe opening, or slot opening.
Floor opening An opening measuring 12 inches or more in its least dimension,
in any floor, platform, pavement, or yard through which persons
may fall; such as a hatchway, stair or ladder opening, pit, or large
manhole. Floor openings occupied by elevators, dumb waiters,
conveyors, machinery, or containers are excluded from this
subpart.
General Duty Section 5.a.1 of the OSH Act which states “. . . that every
Clause employer covered under the Act furnish to his employees
employment and a place of employment which are free from
recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to his employees.”
Guard A barrier that prevents entry of the operator’s hands or fingers
into the point of operation.
Hazard not As defined in OSHA’s Hazard Communication standard, a
otherwise ″Hazard not otherwise classified (HNOC)″ means an adverse
classified physical or health effect identified through evaluation of scientific
(HNOC) evidence during the classification process that does not meet the
specified criteria for the physical and health hazard classes
addressed in §1910.1200. This does not extend coverage to
adverse physical and health effects for which there is a hazard
class addressed in §1910.1200, but the effect either falls below
the cut-off value/concentration limit of the hazard class or is
under a GHS hazard category that has not been adopted by
OSHA (e.g., acute toxicity Category 5).
HAZWOPER Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response,
regulated under §1910.120.
Healthcare Physicians (PHCPs) or other licensed healthcare professionals
professional (LHCPs) with the appropriate license, registration or certificate
that allows them to provide a relevant opinion.
6–Glossaries 3/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
3/13 Glossaries–7
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
8–Glossaries 3/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
3/13 Glossaries–8A
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
8B–Glossaries 3/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Tagout device Any prominent warning device, such as tag and a means of
attachment, which can be securely fastened to an energy-
isolating device in accordance with an established procedure.
The tag indicates that the machine or equipment to which it is
attached is not to be operated until the tag-out device is removed
in accordance with the energy control procedure.
Teratogenic Capable of causing birth defects.
Threshold limit The airborne concentration of a material, representing conditions
value under which it is believed that nearly all workers may be
repeatedly exposed without adverse health effects.
Toxic substance Any substance that has the capacity to produce personal injury or
illness through ingestion, inhalation, or absorption through any
body surface.
Uncontrolled The accidental release of a hazardous substance from its
release container. If not contained, stopped, and removed, the release
would pose a hazard to employees in the immediate area or in
areas in the path of the release, or from its by-products or its
effects.
Upper explosive The maximum concentration of a flammable vapor above which
limit ignition will not occur even on contact with a source of ignition.
Upper The maximum concentration of gas or vapor in air above which it
flammable limit is not possible to ignite the vapors.
Volatile organic A fast evaporating substance used in coatings and in paints as
compound they evaporate very quickly.
WHMIS A Canadian workplace safety rule that requires the creation and
availability of material safety data sheets, warning labels on
hazardous materials, and employee education and training.
Z List The OSHA tables of permissible exposure limits (PELs) for air
contaminants, found in Subpart Z, Toxic and Hazardous
Substances, §1910.1000. Contains Tables Z-1, Z-2, and Z-3.
Glossaries–9
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
AA Atomic Absorption
Absorption of electromagnetic radiation at discrete wavelengths by
atoms. The quantity of absorbed radiation is a measure of the
concentration or amount of that atom in the sample.
AAS Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
Performed by stimulating a filament of a chosen element and using
the light emitted by the filament to detect the amount of that element
in a sample by measuring the absorption of the light.
AAOHN American Association of Occupational Health Nurses
ABIH American Board of Industrial Hygiene
The organization which conducts the testing for CIH and issues the
CIH credential.
ABSA American Biological Safety Association
A professional association for the exchange of biosafety information.
ACGIH American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
A professional association well known for establishing and publishing
the TLVs, for publishing the Industrial Ventilation Manual, and as one
of the sponsors of the ABIH and AIHCE.
ACM Asbestos Containing Material
ACS American Chemical Society
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
ADAAG Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines
AE Atomic Emission
The emission of electromagnetic radiation at discrete wavelengths by
exited atoms. Quantity of emitted light is a measure of the
concentration or amount of that atom present in a sample.
AES Atomic Emission Spectrophotometry
Analysis by detection and quantification of the characteristic
electromagnetic emissions from atoms in a sample.
AFL-CIO American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial
Organizations
AGA American Gas Association
10–Glossaries
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Glossaries–11
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
12–Glossaries
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Glossaries–13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
14–Glossaries
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Glossaries–15
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
16–Glossaries
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Glossaries–17
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
18–Glossaries
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
3/13 Glossaries–19
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
20–Glossaries 3/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
3/13 Glossaries–21
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
22–Glossaries 3/13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Glossaries–23
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Reserved
24–Glossaries
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Agency Contacts
Colorado Florida
www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite/CDLE- www.myflorida.com
LaborLaws/CDLE/1240336908932 Fort Lauderdale Area Office
Denver Area Office 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 100
1391 Speer Boulevard, Suite 210 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33324
Denver, CO 80204-2552 (954) 424-0242
(303) 844-5285 Fax: (954) 424-3073
Fax: (303) 844-6676 Jacksonville Area Office
Englewood Area Office Ribault Building, Suite 227
7935 East Prentice Avenue, Suite 209 1851 Executive Center Drive
Englewood, CO 80111-2714 Jacksonville, FL 32207
(303) 843-4500 (904) 232-2895
Fax: (303) 843-4515 Fax: (904) 232-1294
Connecticut Tampa Area Office
www.ctdol.state.ct.us/ 5807 Breckenridge Parkway, Suite A
Bridgeport Area Office Tampa, FL 33610-4249
Clark Building (813) 626-1177
1057 Broad Street, 4th Floor Fax: (813) 626-7015
Bridgeport, CT 06604 Georgia
(203) 579-5581 http://www.dol.state.ga.us/
Fax: (203) 579-5516 Atlanta East Area Office
Hartford Area Office LaVista Perimeter Office Park
William R. Cotter Federal Building 2183 North Lake Parkway, Building 7
135 High St., Room 361 Suite 110
Hartford, CT 06103 Tucker, GA 30084-4154
(860) 240-3152 (770) 493-6644
Fax: (860) 240-3155 Fax: (770) 493-7725
Delaware Atlanta West Area Office
www.delawareworks.com/ 1995 North Park Place S.E., Suite 525
Wilmington Area Office Atlanta, GA 30339
Mellon Bank Building, Suite 900 (678) 903-7301
919 Market Street Fax: (770) 984-8855
Wilmington, DE 19801-3319 Savannah Area Office
(302) 573-6518 450 Mall Boulevard, Suite J
Fax: (302) 573-6532 Savannah, GA 31406
District of Columbia (912) 652-4393
Fax: (912) 652-4329
Baltimore/Washington, D.C. Area Office
OSHA Area Office
U.S. Department of Labor-OSHA
1099 Winterson Road, Suite 140
Linthicum, MD 21090
(410) 865-2055/2056
Fax: (410) 865-2068
Hawaii Indiana
http://labor.hawaii.gov/ www.state.in.us/dol/
Honolulu Area Office Indianapolis Area Office
U.S. Dept. of Labor – OSHA 46 East Ohio Street, Room 453
Prince Jonah Kuhio Kalanianaole Federal Indianapolis, IN 46204
Building (317) 226-7290
Fax: (317) 226-7292
300 Ala Mona Blvd., Room 5-146
Honolulu, HI 96850 Iowa
(808) 541-2680 www.iowaworkforce.org/
Fax: (808) 541-3456 U.S. Department of Labor - OSHA
210 Walnut Street, Room 815
Idaho
Des Moines, IA 50309-2015
http://labor.idaho.gov/ (515) 284-4794
Boise Area Office Fax: (515) 284-4058
1150 North Curtis Road, Suite 201
Boise, ID 83706 Kansas
(208) 321-2960 www.kdhe.state.ks.us/
Fax: (208) 321-2966 Wichita Area Office
100 N. Broadway, Suite 470
Illinois Wichita, KS 67202
www.illinois.gov/idol/Pages/default.aspx (316) 269-6644
Calumet City Area Office (800) 362-2896 (Kansas residents only)
1600 167th Street, Suite 9 Fax: (316) 269-6185
Calumet City, IL 60409 Kentucky
(708) 891-3800
www.labor.ky.gov/Pages/LaborHome.aspx
Fax: (708) 862-9659
Nashville Area Office
Chicago North Area Office 51 Century Boulevard Suite 340
701 Lee Street, Suite 950 Nashville, TN 37214
Des Plaines, IL 60016 (615) 232-3803
(847) 803-4800 Fax: (615) 232-3827
Fax: (847) 390-8220 Louisiana
Fairview Heights District Office www.ldol.state.la.us/
11 Executive Drive, Suite 11 Baton Rouge Area Office
Fairview Heights, IL 62208 9100 Bluebonnet Center Boulevard, Suite
(618) 632-8612 201
Fax: (618) 632-5712 Baton Rouge, LA 70809
North Aurora Area Office (225) 298-5458
365 Smoke Tree Plaza Fax: (225) 298-5457
North Aurora, IL 60542 Maine
(630) 896-8700 www.state.me.us/labor/
Fax: (630) 892-2160 Augusta Area Office
Peoria Area Office E.S. Muskie Federal Building
1320 West Commerce Drive 40 Western Avenue, Room G-26
Peoria, IL 61615-1462 Augusta, ME 04330
(309) 589-7033 (207) 626-9160
Fax: (309) 589-7326 Fax: (207) 622-8213
West Virginia
www.wvminesafety.org/
Charleston Area Office
405 Capitol Street, Suite 407
Charleston, WV 25301-1727
(304) 347-5937
Fax: (304) 347-5275
Wisconsin
http://dwd.wisconsin.gov/
Appleton Area Office
1648 Tri Park Way
Appleton, WI 54914
(920) 734-4521
Fax: (920) 734-2661
Eau Claire Area Office
1310 West Clairemont Avenue
Eau Claire, WI 54701
(715) 832-9019
Fax: (715) 832-1147
Madison Area Office
4802 East Broadway
Madison, WI 53716
(608) 441-5388
Fax: (608) 441-5400
Milwaukee Area Office
310 West Wisconsin Avenue, Room 1180
Milwaukee, WI 53203
(414) 297-3315
Fax: (414) 297-4299
Wyoming
http://wyomingworkforce.org/Pages/
default.aspx
There are no area offices in Wyoming.
Contact the regional office in Denver, CO
at:
Herb Gibson, Area Director
U.S. Department of Labor
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
1391 Speer Blvd., Suite 210
Denver, CO 80204-2552
(303) 844-5285, Ext.106
Alaska Hawaii
http://labor.state.ak.us/lss/home.htm http://labor.hawaii.gov/hiosh/
Alaska Department of Labor & Workforce Hawaii Department of Labor and Industrial
Development Relations
1111 W 8th Street, Room 304 Hawaii Occupational Safety and Health
P.O. Box 111149 Division (HIOSH)
Juneau, AK 99811-1149 830 Punchbowl Street, Suite 423
(907) 465-4855 Honolulu, HI 96813
(808) 586-9100
Arizona
www.ica.state.az.us/ADOSH/ Illinois
ADOSH_main.aspx www.illinois.gov/idol/Pages/default.aspx
Arizona Division of Occupational Safety Illinois Department of Labor
and Health (ADOSH) 900 S. Spring Street
800 W Washington Street, 2nd floor Springfield, IL 62704
Phoenix, AZ 85007-2922 (217) 782-6206
(602) 542-5795 Indiana
California www.in.gov/dol/iosha.htm
www.dir.ca.gov/occupational_safety.html Indiana Department of Labor
California Department of Industrial 402 West Washington Street, Room W195
Relations (DIR) Indianapolis, IN 46204
Division of Occupational Safety and Health (317) 232-2693
1515 Clay Street Suite 1901 Iowa
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 286-7000 www.iowaworkforce.org/labor/iosh/
index.html
Connecticut Iowa Division of Labor Services and
www.ctdol.state.ct.us/osha/osha.htm Workforce Development
Connecticut Department of Labor 1000 East Grand Avenue
200 Folly Brook Boulevard Des Moines, IA 50319-0209
Wethersfield, CT 06109 (515) 242-5870
(860) 263-6000
Conn-OSHA
38 Wolcott Hill Road
Wethersfield, CT 06109
(860) 263-6900
Kentucky Nevada
www.labor.ky.gov/dows/oshp/Pages/ http://dirweb.state.nv.us/OSHA/osha.htm
Occupational-Safety-and-Health- Nevada Division of Industrial Relations
Program.aspx Occupational Safety and Health
Kentucky Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Program 1301 North Green Valley Parkway, Suite
1047 U.S. Highway 127 South, Suite 4 200
Frankfort, KY 40601 Henderson, Nevada 89074
(502) 564-3070 (702) 486-9020
Maryland New Jersey
www.dllr.state.md.us/labor/mosh.html http://lwd.dol.state.nj.us/labor/lsse/
Department of Labor, Licensing and employer/Public_Employees_OSH.html
Regulation New Jersey Department of Labor and
Division of Labor and Industry Workforce Development
Maryland Occupational Safety and Health Public Employees Occupational Safety and
(MOSH) Health (PEOSH) Office
10946 Golden West Drive, Suite 160 1 John Fitch Plaza
Hunt Valley, MD 21031 P.O. Box 110
(410) 527-4499 Trenton, NJ 08625-0110
Michigan (609) 633-3896
www.michigan.gov/lara/0,4601,7-154- New Mexico
61256_11407---,00.html www.nmenv.state.nm.us/Ohsb_Website/
Michigan Department of Licensing and index.htm
Regulatory Affairs (LARA) New Mexico Environment Department
Michigan Occupational Safety & Health Occupational Safety and Health Bureau
Administration (MIOSHA) 525 Camino de los Marquez, Suite 3
P.O. Box 30643 Santa Fe, NM 87502
7150 Harris Drive (505) 476-8700
Lansing, MI 48909-8143
(517) 322-1814 New York
Minnesota www.labor.state.ny.us/workerprotection/
safetyhealth/DOSH_PESH.shtm
www.dli.mn.gov/MnOsha.asp NYS Department of Labor
Minnesota Department of Labor and Public Employees Safety and Health
Industry (PESH) Bureau
Minnesota OSHA Compliance W.A. Harriman Campus
443 Lafayette Road North Building 12, Room 158
St. Paul, MN 55155 Albany, NY 12240
(651) 284-5050 (518) 457-1263
North Carolina
www.nclabor.com/osha/osh.htm
North Carolina Department of Labor
Occupational Safety and Health Division
1101 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1101
(919) 807-2900
Oregon Vermont
www.orosha.org/ http://labor.vermont.gov/vosha/
Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Vermont Department of Labor and Industry
Division (Oregon OSHA) 5 Green Mountain Drive
Department of Consumer and Business P.O. Box 488
Services Montpelier, VT 05601-0488
350 Winter Street NE, Room 430 (802) 828-4000
P.O. Box 14480 Virgin Islands
Salem, OR 97309-0405 www.vidol.gov/Units/OSHA/OSHA.htm
(503) 378-3272 Virgin Islands Department of Labor
(VIDOSH)
Puerto Rico St. Croix Main Office
www.trabajo.pr.gov/prosha/index.asp 3012 Golden Rock, VITRACO Mall
Puerto Rico Occupational Safety and St. Croix, VI 00890
Health Administration (PR OSHA) (340) 772-1315
P.O. Box 195540 St. Thomas Main Office
San Juan, PR 00919-5540 53A & 54B Kronprindense Gade
(787) 754-2172 St. Thomas, VI 00803-2608
South Carolina (340) 776-3700
www.scosha.llronline.com/ Virginia
South Carolina Department of Labor, www.doli.virginia.gov/
Licensing and Regulation Virginia Department of Labor and Industry
South Carolina OSHA Main Street Centre Bldg.
P.O. Box 11329 600 East Main Street
Columbia, S.C. 29211 Richmond, VA 23219-4101
(803) 896-7665 (804) 371-2327
Tennessee Washington
www.tn.gov/labor-wfd/tosha.shtml www.lni.wa.gov/Safety/default.asp
Department of Labor and Workforce Washington Department of Labor and
Development Industries
TOSHA Division of Occupational Safety & Health
220 French Landing Drive (DOSH)
Nashville, TN 37243-0655 P.O. Box 44600
(615) 741-2793 Olympia, WA 98504-4600
Utah (360) 902-5494
www.laborcommission.utah.gov/divisions/ Wyoming
UOSH/index.html http://wyomingworkforce.org/employers-
Utah Labor Commission and-businesses/osha/Pages/default.aspx
Utah OSHA Wyoming Workers Safety and
160 East 300 South, 3rd Floor Compensation Division
P.O. Box 146600 1510 East Pershing Boulevard, West Wing
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-6600 Cheyenne, WY 82002
(801) 530-6901 (307) 777-7786
Note: Connecticut, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, and the Virgin Islands plans cover public
employees only.
Delaware Guam
http://dia.delawareworks.com/safety-health- http://www.dol.guam.gov/content/
consultation/ occupational-safety-and-health-
Delaware Department of Labor administration-osha-site-consultation
Office of Safety & Health Guam Department of Labor
Division of Industrial Affairs OSHA Onsite Consultation Program
4425 N. Market St. 414 West Soledad Ave.
Wilmington, DE 19802 GCIC Bldg., 4th Fl.
(302) 761-8225 Hagatna, Guam 96910
District of Columbia (671) 300-4582
http://does.dc.gov/service/occupational- Fax: (671) 475-6811
safety-and-health Hawaii
Available only for employers within the
http://labor.hawaii.gov/hiosh/home/for-
District of Columbia
employers/consultation/
D.C. Department of Employment Services
Labor Standards Bureau Consultation & Training Branch
Office of Occupational Safety & Health Department of Labor & Industrial Relations
4058 Minnesota Ave., NE 830 Punchbowl St., #423
Washington, DC 20019 Honolulu, HI 96813
(202) 671-1800 (808) 586-9100
Fax: (202) 673-2380 Fax: (808) 586-9104
Florida Idaho
www.usfsafetyflorida.com/ http://oshcon.boisestate.edu/
Safety Florida Consultation Program OSHCon
University of South Florida Boise State University
13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., MDC 56 1910 University Dr., MS-1825
Tampa, FL 33612 Boise, ID 83725-1825
(866) 273-1105 (208) 426-3283
Fax: (813) 974-8270 Fax: (208) 426-4411
Georgia Illinois
www.oshainfo.gatech.edu/ www.illinoisosha.com/
21(d) Onsite Consultation Program Illinois On-site Consultation
Georgia Institute of Technology Illinois Department of Labor
260 14th St., NW 900 S. Spring St.
North Building Springfield, IL 62704
Atlanta, GA 30332-0837 (217) 782-1442
(404) 407-8276 Fax: (217) 785-0596
Fax: (404) 407-9024
Indiana
www.in.gov/dol/2375.htm
INSafe
Indiana Department of Labor
402 W. Washington St., W195
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 232-2655
Fax: (317) 233-3790
Iowa Maine
www.iowaworkforce.org/labor/iosh/ www.safetyworksmaine.com/consultations
consultation/index.htm SafetyWorks!
Iowa Workforce Development Maine Department of Labor
Division of Labor Services 45 State House Station
OSHA Consultation & Education Augusta, ME 04333-0045
1000 E. Grand Ave. (207) 623-7900 or toll-free (877) 723-3345
Des Moines, IA 50319 Maryland
(515) 281-7629 www.dllr.state.md.us/labor/mosh/volc.shtml
Fax: (515) 281-5522 MOSH Consultation Services
Kansas 10946 Golden West Dr., Ste. 160
www.dol.ks.gov/Safety/assistance.aspx Hunt Valley, MD 21031
(410) 527-4472
Kansas Department of Labor
Fax: (410) 527-5678
Industrial Safety & Health
417 S.W. Jackson St. Massachusetts
Topeka, KS 66603-3327 www.mass.gov/lwd/labor-standards/on-site-
(785) 296-4386, ext. 2310 consultation-program/
Fax: (785) 296-1775 Massachusetts Department of Labor
Kentucky Standards
OSHA Consultation Program
www.labor.ky.gov/dows/oshp/Pages/ Wall Experiment Station
Occupational-Safety-and-Health- 37 Shattuck St.
Program.aspx Lawrence, MA 01843
Kentucky Occupational Safety and Health (617) 626-6504
Program Fax: (978) 688-0352
1047 U.S. Hwy. 127 South, Ste. 4
Frankfort, KY 40601 Michigan
(502) 564-3070 www.michigan.gov/lara/0,4601,7-154-
Fax: (502) 696-1902 61256_11407---,00.html
Louisiana Consultation Education & Training Division
Michigan Occupational Safety and Health
wwwprd.doa.louisiana.gov/LaServices/ Administration
PublicPages/ServiceDetail.cfm?service_id= Labor & Economic Growth
2320 7150 Harris Dr.
21(d) Consultation Program P.O. Box 30643
Louisiana Department of Labor Lansing, MI 48909-8413
OSHA Consultation, Office of Workers’ (517) 322-1809
Compensation (800) 866-4674
1001 North 23rd Street Fax: (517) 322-1374
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9094
(225) 342-7561 Minnesota
Fax: (225) 342-5665 www.doli.state.mn.us/Wsc.asp
Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry
Consultation Division
443 Lafayette Rd. North
St. Paul, MN 55155
(651) 284-5060
Fax: (651) 284-5739
West Virginia
www.wvlabor.com/newwebsite/Pages/
Safety_osha_consultation.html
West Virginia Department of Labor
WISHA Services Division
Capitol Complex Building #6
1800 E. Washington Street, Rm. B-749
Charleston, WV 25305
(304) 558-7890
Fax: (360) 902-5438
Wisconsin
www.slh.wisc.edu/occupational/wiscon/
University of Wisconsin State Laboratory of
Hygiene
2601 Agriculture Dr.
P.O. Box 7996
Madison, WI 53707-7996
(608) 226-5240
(800) 947-0553
Fax: (608) 226-5249
Wyoming
www.wyomingworkforce.org/employers-
and-businesses/osha/Pages/safety-and-
health-consultation.aspx
Wyoming Department of Workforce
Services OSHA Division
1510 E. Pershing Blvd., West Wing
Cheyenne, WY 82002
(307) 777-7710
Fax: (307) 777-3646
Association Addresses
Current as of August 5, 2014.
Alliance of Hazardous Materials American Institute of Chemical
Professionals (AHMP) Engineers (AICE)
www.ahmpnet.org www.aiche.org
9650 Rockville Pike 120 Wall St. Fl. 23
Bethesda, MD 20814 New York, NY 10005-4020
(800) 437-0137 (toll-free) (800) 242-4363
(301) 634-7430 (203) 702-7660 (outside the U.S.)
Fax: (301) 634-7431 Fax: (203) 775-5177
American Chemistry Council (ACC) American National Standards Institute
www.americanchemistry.com (ANSI)
700 2nd St., Northeast www.ansi.org
Washington, DC 20002 1899 L St., NW, 11th Fl.
(202) 249-7000 Washington, DC 20036
Fax: (202) 249-6100 (202) 293-8020
American Chemical Society (ACS) Fax: (202) 293-9287
www.acs.org or
1155 16th St., Northwest 25 W 43rd St., 4th Fl.
Washington, DC 20036 New York, NY 10036
(800) 227-5558 (US only) (212) 642-4900
(202) 872-4600 (Worldwide) Fax: (212) 398-0023
American Conference of Governmental American Petroleum Institute (API)
Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) www.api.org
www.acgih.org 1220 L St., Northwest
1330 Kemper Meadow Dr. Washington, DC 20005-4070
Cincinnati, OH 45240 (202) 682-8000
(513) 742-2020 (customers/members) American Society of Heating,
(513) 742-6163 (administrative phone) Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning
Fax: (513) 742-3355 Engineers
American Industrial Hygiene www.ashrae.org
Association (AIHA) 1791 Tullie Circle, Northeast
www.aiha.org Atlanta, GA 30329
3141 Fairview Park Dr., Ste. 777 (800) 527-4723 (U.S. and Canada only)
Falls Church, VA 22042 (404) 636-8400
(703) 849-8888 Fax: (404) 321-5478
Fax: (703) 207-3561 American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM)
www.astm.org
100 Barr Harbor Dr.
P.O. Box C700
West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959
(877) 909-2786 (U.S. and Canada only)
(610) 832-9585 (International)
Index
Numerics
300 Log
I/J/K, Injury and Illness Recordkeeping ...............................................................10
300A Summary
I/J/K, Injury and Illness Recordkeeping.................................................................1
301 Incident Report
I/J/K, Injury and Illness Recordkeeping ...............................................................10
A
Abrasive Wheel Machinery
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................41
Acrylontrile
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................59
AEDs
A, AEDs......................................................................................................1
Aerial Lifts
A, Aerial Lifts................................................................................................1
Agency Addresses
Reference, Agency Contacts ................................................1, 10, 11, 12, 15, 22, 25
Association Addresses
Reference, Agency Contacts ...........................................................................22
OSHA Consultation Services
Reference, Agency Contacts ...........................................................................15
OSHA District Offices
Reference, Agency Contacts ...........................................................................11
OSHA Local Area Offices
Reference, Agency Contacts ............................................................................1
OSHA Regional Offices
Reference, Agency Contacts ...........................................................................10
Other Relevant Addresses
Reference, Agency Contacts ...........................................................................25
Air Monitoring
C, Confined Spaces........................................................................................1
Aisles and Walkways
A, Aisles and Walkways...................................................................................1
Alternate Entry
C, Confined Spaces........................................................................................1
9/14 Index-1
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Anchoring
M/N, Machine Guarding ...................................................................................1
S, Storage Racks...........................................................................................1
Asbestos
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................57
Associations
Reference, Agency Contacts ...........................................................................22
Association Contact Information
Reference, Agency Contacts ...........................................................................22
Audits
R, Recordkeeping ..........................................................................................1
Automated External Defibrillators
A, AEDs......................................................................................................1
B
Back Belts
E, Ergonomics ..............................................................................................1
Bakery Equipment
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................46
Battery Charging
E, Emergency Eyewashes and Showers ...............................................................3
P/Q, Powered Industrial Trucks ..........................................................................1
Bloodborne Pathogens
B, Bloodborne Pathogens.................................................................................1
F/G, First Aid ................................................................................................1
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................58
R, Recordkeeping ..........................................................................................1
C
Cages and Wells
F/G, Fixed Ladders.........................................................................................1
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
F/G, First Aid ................................................................................................2
Coke Oven Emissions
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................57
Commercial Diving
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................56
Equipment
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................56
Index-2 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Pre-Dive Procedures
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................56
Compressed Gas Cylinders
C, Compressed Gases ....................................................................................1
Compressed Gases
C, Compressed Gases ....................................................................................1
I/J/K, Inspections..........................................................................................11
Confined Spaces
C, Confined Spaces........................................................................................1
Contractors
E, Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution ......................................1
I/J/K, Injury and Illness Recordkeeping.................................................................3
L, Lockout/Tagout ..........................................................................................1
CPR
F/G, First Aid ................................................................................................2
Cranes
I/J/K, Inspections .....................................23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34
Crawler Locomotive and Truck Cranes
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................29
Overhead and Gantry Cranes
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................23
Recordkeeping
I/J/K, Inspections ...............................................24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34
D
Days Away
I/J/K, Injury and Illness Recordkeeping.................................................................3
Derricks
I/J/K, Inspections..................................................................35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
Recordkeeping
I/J/K, Inspections ......................................................................36, 37, 38, 39, 40
Dipping and Coating Operations
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................15
Drill Presses
M/N, Machine Guarding ...................................................................................2
E
EAP
E, Emergency Action Plans...............................................................................1
9/14 Index-3
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Index-4 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Exposure Incidents
B, Bloodborne Pathogens.................................................................................4
Extension Cords
E, Extension Cords.........................................................................................1
Eye Protection
E, Eye and Face Protection ..............................................................................1
Eyewashes
E, Emergency Eyewashes and Showers ...............................................................1
P/Q, Powered Industrial Trucks ..........................................................................1
F
Face Protection
E, Eye and Face Protection ..............................................................................1
Fall Protection
A, Aerial Lifts................................................................................................1
E, Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution ......................................2
F/G, Fall Protection ........................................................................................1
F/G, Fixed Ladders.........................................................................................2
P/Q, Portable Ladders .....................................................................................1
S, Scissor Lifts ..............................................................................................1
Fire Brigades
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................19
Fire Prevention Plans
E, Emergency Action Plans...............................................................................4
F/G, Fire Prevention Plans................................................................................1
First Aid
E, Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution ......................................2
F/G, First Aid ................................................................................................1
F/G, First Aid Kits...........................................................................................1
I/J/K, Injury and Illness Recordkeeping.................................................................8
First Aid Kits
F/G, First Aid Kits...........................................................................................1
First Aid Supplies
F/G, First Aid ................................................................................................2
F/G, First Aid Kits...........................................................................................3
Fixed Extinguishing Systems
I/J/K, Inspections.....................................................................................20, 21
Recordkeeping
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................21
9/14 Index-5
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Fixed Ladders
F/G, Fixed Ladders.........................................................................................1
Flammable Liquids
F/G, Flammable Liquids ...................................................................................1
I/J/K, Inspections..........................................................................................11
Flexible Cords
E, Extension Cords.........................................................................................1
Flushing Fluid
E, Emergency Eyewashes and Showers ...............................................................4
Forging Machines
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................43
Recordkeeping
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................43
Forklifts
P/Q, Powered Industrial Trucks ..........................................................................1
Formaldehyde
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................59
G
Grain Handling
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................55
Grinders
M/N, Machine Guarding ...................................................................................4
H
Handrails
S, Stairs ......................................................................................................1
Hard Hats
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................17
Hazard Communication
H, Hazard Communication ................................................................................1
HazCom
H, Hazard Communication ................................................................................1
HAZWOPER
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................14
Recordkeeping
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................14
Index-6 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Head Protection
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................17
Helicopters
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................40
Hepatitis B
B, Bloodborne Pathogens.................................................................................6
Hepatitis B Vaccination
B, Bloodborne Pathogens.................................................................................6
Hydrogen
I/J/K, Inspections..........................................................................................11
I
Injury and Illness Recordkeeping
I/J/K, Injury and Illness Recordkeeping.................................................................1
Inorganic Arsenic
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................57
Recordkeeping
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................57
Inspection
E, Emergency Eyewashes and Showers ...............................................................5
F/G, First Aid Kits...........................................................................................1
F/G, Fixed Ladders.........................................................................................2
I/J/K, Inspections ...........................................................................................1
P/Q, Portable Fire Extinguishers.........................................................................1
P/Q, Portable Ladders .....................................................................................1
P/Q, Powered Industrial Trucks ..........................................................................2
Inspections
R, Recordkeeping ..........................................................................................1
S, Storage Racks...........................................................................................2
Ionizing Radiation
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................59
L
Labeling
H, Hazard Communication ................................................................................5
Ladders
I/J/K, Inspections ...........................................................................................5
Fixed Ladders
I/J/K, Inspections ...........................................................................................5
9/14 Index-7
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Index-8 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
N
Needlesticks
B, Bloodborne Pathogens.................................................................................1
Non-Permit Required Confined Space
C, Confined Spaces........................................................................................1
P
Paint Booths
S, Spray Booths ............................................................................................1
Parking Lots
I/J/K, Injury and Illness Recordkeeping ...............................................................13
Periodic Inspections
L, Lockout/Tagout ..........................................................................................7
9/14 Index-9
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
Index-10 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
R
Recordkeeping
B, Bloodborne Pathogens ...............................................................................11
C, Confined Spaces........................................................................................5
I/J/K, Injury and Illness Recordkeeping ............................................................1, 15
L, Lockout/Tagout .........................................................................................10
P/Q, Portable Fire Extinguishers.........................................................................5
R, Recordkeeping ..........................................................................................1
Refresher Training
T/U/V, Training ..............................................................................................1
Regulated Waste
B, Bloodborne Pathogens ...............................................................................12
Rescue
C, Confined Spaces........................................................................................6
Respirators
R, Respiratory Protection .................................................................................1
Respiratory Protection
I/J/K, Inspections.....................................................................................15, 16
R, Respiratory Protection .................................................................................1
Recordkeeping
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................16
Restricted Work
I/J/K, Injury and Illness Recordkeeping ...............................................................16
Rim Wheels
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................22
Rolling Stock
F/G, Fall Protection ........................................................................................2
Roofs
F/G, Fall Protection ........................................................................................3
9/14 Index-11
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
S
Safety Chains
F/G, Fall Protection ........................................................................................3
Safety Data Sheets
H, Hazard Communication ..............................................................................11
Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)
R, Recordkeeping ..........................................................................................2
Sawmills
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................47
Scaffolding
I/J/K, Inspections ...........................................................................................6
Scissor Lifts
S, Scissor Lifts ..............................................................................................1
SDS
H, Hazard Communication ..............................................................................11
Seat Belts
P/Q, Powered Industrial Trucks ..........................................................................9
Sharps
B, Bloodborne Pathogens ...............................................................................14
Sharps Containers
B, Bloodborne Pathogens ...............................................................................14
Showers
E, Emergency Eyewashes and Showers ...............................................................1
Slings
I/J/K, Inspections.....................................................................................40, 41
Recordkeeping
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................41
Spill Kit
B, Bloodborne Pathogens ...............................................................................16
Spray Booths
S, Spray Booths ............................................................................................1
Spray Finishing
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................12
S, Spray Booths ............................................................................................1
Stairs
S, Stairs ......................................................................................................1
Index-12 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
T
Tagout
L, Lockout/Tagout .........................................................................................12
Telecommunications
I/J/K, Inspections.....................................................................................49, 51
Recordkeeping
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................51
Training
A, AEDs......................................................................................................1
A, Aerial Lifts................................................................................................2
B, Bloodborne Pathogens ...............................................................................16
C, Confined Spaces........................................................................................7
E, Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution ......................................5
E, Emergency Action Plans...............................................................................5
F/G, Fire Prevention Plans................................................................................4
H, Hazard Communication ..............................................................................17
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................60
L, Lockout/Tagout .........................................................................................13
M/N, Machine Guarding ...................................................................................7
P/Q, Portable Fire Extinguishers.........................................................................6
P/Q, Portable Ladders .....................................................................................2
P/Q, Powered Industrial Trucks.........................................................................11
S, Scissor Lifts ..............................................................................................2
T/U/V, Training...........................................................................................1, 2
Training Requirements At-A-Glance
T/U/V, Training ..............................................................................................2
U
Universal Precautions
B, Bloodborne Pathogens ...............................................................................17
9/14 Index-13
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Workplace Safety Answer Manual
V
Vehicle-Mounted Elevating and Rotating Work Platforms
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................10
Ventilation
I/J/K, Inspections..........................................................................................11
W
Walking-Working Surfaces
S, Stairs ......................................................................................................1
Walking–Working Surfaces
A, Aisles and Walkways...................................................................................1
Welding
E, Eye and Face Protection ..............................................................................4
I/J/K, Inspections.....................................................................................44, 45
General
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................44
Oxygen-Fuel Gas Welding and Cutting
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................44
Recordkeeping
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................45
Resistance Welding
I/J/K, Inspections .........................................................................................45
Workplace Inspection
I/J/K, Inspections ...........................................................................................1
Index-14 9/14
Original content is the copyrighted property of J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.