Written Assignment

Module code: IPRC05

Module title: English for Professional Purposes 1

Written Assignment (50%)

 Work individually to write an assignment of one issue presented by one group in your class,
which you are allocated to.

Suggestions
The length of the essay is up to 2500 words, and it must cover the following topics:
 Importance/ Role of the issue in the field (500 words)

 Summary of the knowledge a) from your reading and b) reflecting on the content of the
presentation (800 words)

 Key terms related to the topic of the presentation (either learnt from the presentation or
learnt by yourself) – definition/ explanation of the terms + equivalents in Vietnamese +
examples (at least 10 terms) (400 words)

 Strengths & weaknesses of the presentation (500 words)

 One point you would like to challenge the presenters or further develop/demonstrate the
presenters’ view (300 words)
Essay Marking Criteria Descriptors
 Task Achievement (60%)

o Critical overall response to the topic and very clear framing of the issue;
o Deep analysis and original ideas of the topic;
o Very clear and well-supported comparison/ contrast showing deep
understanding of the issue.

 Language Use (30%)

o Varied and grammatical correct sentence structure

o Very good word choice and extensive word range
o Coherent & cohesive

 Layout & Referencing (10%)

o Well-presented with clear report layout and format (i.e. inclusion of necessary
essay sections; paragraphing, use of font, size, line spacing, etc. as required)
o Comprehensively referenced (i.e. correct and consistent use of referencing
system; correct reference list, etc.)
Written Assignment Marking Rubrics
Grades Description

Excellent (higher)  demonstrates thorough, critical understanding of current knowledge

 demonstrates a critical awareness of the principles and practices of
(90-100%). the discipline
Exceptional work which:-

Excellent (lower)  demonstrates a thorough and comprehensive understanding of the

(85-89%).
Excellent work which:-
discipline
 shows evidence of extensive, relevant reading which includes up-to-
date research
 reveals originality and insight
 demonstrates ability to critically evaluate complex ideas

Very good  demonstrates a sound understanding of the discipline

(70-84%).
Very good work which:-
Good
(50–69%). Good work which:-
 shows effective and competent use of literature
 demonstrates a clear understanding of complex ideas
 demonstrates the ability to analyse, interpret and organise
information effectively
 demonstrates a wide reading base
 is a clear, concise and well structured presentation
 demonstrates a generally sound understanding of the discipline
 makes good use of relevant literature
 demonstrates ability to synthesise information into a clear, well
structured account / argument

Satisfactory  demonstrates an understanding of the discipline

 shows evidence of relevant reading
(40–54%).  demonstrates ability to work towards tasks set, but more descriptive
Fair work which:- than analytical
 demonstrates the ability to organise work appropriately

Borderline fail  demonstrates a basic understanding of the discipline

(35-39%). Weak work which:-
 demonstrates some evidence of reading
 demonstrates evidence of broadly working towards the task(s) set
Weaknesses may be identified in one or more of the following:-
fragmentary coverage; errors and omissions; organisation and
presentation; misconceptions; inclusion of irrelevant information;
misinterpretation of instructions.

Fail  demonstrates a basic and partial understanding of the discipline

(30-34%).
Inadequate work which:-
 some evidence of reading
 limited focus on task(s) set
Inadequacies may be identified in one or more of the following:-
assessment guidelines not followed; little engagement with the
discipline; errors / omissions; poorly presented work.

Fail  demonstrates little understanding of the discipline

Poor work may be evidenced by one or more of the following:-
(20-29%).
basic misunderstanding or misinterpretations; inability to meet the
Poor work which:-
requirements of the assessment; poor organisation and presentation;
inclusion of inappropriate material.

Fail  demonstrates very limited evidence of understanding of the

discipline
 (1-19%).  follows few or none of the tasks set

Incompetent work which:-

Fail
(0%). Non-submission.

Notes:
- Marking is applied based on HUST criteria. Grades are changed to Marjon equivalent grades
at the end of the year using official grade mapping procedures.
- Non examined work: Grades will be given on a -0 -3 -5 -8 basis only.