BEFORE THE ELECTION TRIBUNAL FOR TALUKA THUL AT KASHMORE.

Election Petition No. __________ OF 2005.

Khamiso and an other. --------------------------------------------------------- Petitioners.

Versus.
D.R.O. Jacobabad and others. ------------------------------------------------ Respondents.

WRITTEN STATEMENT/WRITTEN REPLY.

The respondent No.3 beg to submit as under:-

1. That the contents of Paras No.1 and 2 of the petition are admitted.

2. That the contents of Para No.3 of the petition is vehemently denied as at the
time of filing nomination paper the respondent No.2 has submitted a genuine
Certificate before Returning Officer who after scrutiny found it to be true and
correct and at that time both the Petitioners had not raised any objection.

3. That the contents of paras No.4 & 5 of the petition are vehemently denied as
neither Deputy Director F.I.A. Sukkur is competent to verify the genuineness
of Certificate nor the same was sent by Respondents No.1 & 2 or even the
same was not got verified by this Honourable Tribunal but the same
verification letters were manipulated by the petitioners due to political rivalry
with the respondents No.3 & 4 as they were declared as returned successful
candidates by the respondents No.1 & 2.

4. That the contents of para No.6 of the petition are denied as neither respondent
No.3 has committed any offence nor he is liable to be prosecuted but he has
produced a genuine Matriculation Certificate and beside this respondent No.3
is also Sanad Holder of Alim Fazil degree which is equivalent to the degree of
intermediate as the respondent No.3 has passed the examination of Alim Fazil
from Maderssa Bahar-ul-uloom Shikarpur which is affiliated with Shah Abdul
Latif University Khairpur. Moreover respondent No.3 is a well reputed person
he is son of a Syed Ahmed Shah and is an honest person and he also belongs
to noble family of Sayed, on the contrary petitioners put their evil eyes upon
the public funds.

5. That so far the para No.7 of the petition is concerned no comments upon para
No.7.
 6. That the contents of para No.8 and its sub-paras are vehemently denied and it
is for the petitioners to prove the same, on the contrary this false petition has
been filed by petitioners with their malafide intentions just to pressurize
respondents No.3 & 4 due to political rivalry and respondents No.3 & 4 are
performing their duties legally and lawfully as they are elected Nazim and
Naib Nazim of U.C.No.3 Sherwah Taluka Thul.

7. That it is therefore, requested that this Honourable Tribunal may graciously be

pleased to reject/dismiss the petition of the petitioners with costs in the greater
interest of justice.

KASHMORE. Respondent No.3.

Dated. 16.2.2006.

VERIFICATION.
I, Moosan Shah S/O Ahmed Shah by caste Sayed, adult, muslim,
Nazim, R/O Village Sayed Abdul Ghani Shah U.C. Sherwah Taluka Thul do hereby state
on Oath that whatever stated above is all true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
Verified at Kashmore on this 16th day of February 2006.

DEPONENT.
I know the deponent.

Advocate.
LIST OF DOCUMENTS PRODUCED.

LIST OF DOCUMENTS RELIED UPON.

Any document which prove the case of respondents and in rebut of the
case of petitioners.

Note:- The written statement/written reply of the respondent No.4 is same as of

respondent No.3.

Advocate for the respondents.3 & 4.