MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee:LESTER R. PARADILLO Name of Rater: KAREN S. BACALSO

Position: Teacher I Position: Teacger 1
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Davao City Division DateofReview: February 10, 2023
RatingPeriod:September 2022-February 2023

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied September Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education Knowledge knowledge of 21% Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
2023 shown shown
Services and content within and or inter-observer
Pedagogy across curriculum agreement form/sdone through
teaching areas. onsite /face-to-face/in-person
(PPST 1.1.2) classroom observation
Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
evidence was evidence was
If onsite/face-to-face/in-person shown shown
classes are not implemented,
 through observation of
synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
 through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 2. Used a range September Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education of teaching Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
2023 shown shown
Services strategies that or inter-observer
enhance learner agreement form/sdone through
achievement in onsite /face-to-face/in-person
literacy and classroom observation
numeracy skills.
(PPST 1.4.2) If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
classes are not implemented,
 through observation of
synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
modalities; or Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
evidence was evidence was
 through observation of a shown shown
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Basic 3. Applied a range September Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1

2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education of teaching Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
2023 shown shown
Services strategies to or inter-observer
develop critical agreement form/sdone through
and creative onsite /face-to-face/in-person
thinking, as well classroom observation.
as other higher-
order thinking If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
skills. (PPST classes are not implemented, Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
1.5.2)  through observation of evidence was evidence was
shown shown
synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
 through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed September 21% Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education Environment classroom Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
2023 shown shown
Services & Diversity of structure to or inter-observer
Learners engage learners, agreement form/sdone through
individually or in onsite /face-to-face/in-person
groups, in classroom observation.
meaningful
exploration, If onsite/face-to-face/in-person Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
evidence was evidence was
discovery and classes are not implemented, shown shown
hands-on  through observation of
activities within a synchronous/asynchron
range of physical ous teaching in other
environments. modalities; or
(PPST 2.3.2)  through observation of a
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 5. Managed September Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education learner behavior Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
2023 shown shown
Services constructively by or inter-observer
applying positive agreement form/sdone through
and non-violent onsite /face-to-face/in-person
discipline to classroom observation.
ensure learning-
focused If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
environments. classes are not implemented, Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
evidence was evidence was
(PPST 2.6.2)  through observation of shown shown
synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
 through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 6. Used September Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education differentiated, Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
2023 shown shown
Services developmentally or inter-observer
appropriate agreement form/sdone through
learning onsite /face-to-face/in-person
experiences to classroom observation.
address learners’
gender, needs, If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
strengths, classes are not implemented, Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
interests and  through observation of evidence was evidence was
experiences. synchronous/asynchron shown shown
(PPST 3.1.2) ous teaching in other
modalities; or
 through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, September 21% Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education and Planning managed and Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
2023 shown shown
Services implemented or inter-observer
developmentally agreement form/sdone through
sequenced onsite /face-to-face/in-person
teaching and classroom observation.
learning
processes to Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
If onsite/face-to-face/in-person evidence was evidence was
meet curriculum classes are not implemented, shown shown
requirements and  through observation of
varied teaching synchronous/asynchron
contexts. (PPST ous teaching in other
4.1.2) modalities; or
 through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
8. Participated in September 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality 5 Attended in LAC 5 Attended in LAC 5
2022-July sessions/FGDs/ sessions/FGDs/
collegial LAC sessions/FGDs/
2023 meetings/ meetings/
discussions that meetings/ other collegial other collegial other collegial
use teacher and discussions discussions that discussions that
learner feedback 2. Minutes of LAC sessions discuss teacher/ discuss teacher/
learner feedback learner feedback
to enrich teaching / FGDs/ meetings/ other to enrich to enrich
practice. (PPST collegial discussions on use instruction, as instruction, as
4.4.2) of teacher and learner shown in MOV shown in MOV
feedback to enrich teaching 1 1
practice
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching
practices following
participation from LAC
sessions/ FGDs / meetings/ Timeliness* 5 Participated in 5 Participated in 5
other collegial discussions collegial collegial
that use teacher and learner discussions that discussions that
discuss teacher discuss teacher
feedback to enrich teaching and learner and learner
practice, with proof/s of feedback feedback
attendance across 4 across 4
4. Any equivalent ALS quarters quarters
form/document that
highlights the objective
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 9. Selected, September Classroom Observation Quality 4 No acceptable 4 No acceptable 4
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education developed, Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
2023 shown shown
Services organized and or inter-observer
used appropriate agreement form/sdone through
teaching and onsite /face-to-face/in-person
learning classroom observation.
resources,
including ICT, to If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
address learning Efficiency 4 No acceptable 4 No acceptable 4
classes are not implemented, evidence was evidence was
goals. (PPST  through observation of shown shown
4.5.2) synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
 through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Basic 4. 10. Designed, September 21% Classroom Observation Quality 4 No acceptable 4 No acceptable 4
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education Assessment selected, Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
2023 shown shown
Services and organized and or inter-observer
Reporting used diagnostic, agreement form/sdone through
formative and onsite /face-to-face/in-person
summative classroom observation.
assessment
strategies If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
consistent with classes are not implemented, Efficiency 4 No acceptable 4 No acceptable 4
evidence was evidence was
curriculum  through observation of shown shown
requirements. synchronous/asynchron
(PPST 5.1.2) ous teaching in other
modalities; or
 through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 11. Monitored and September Any one (1) of the following: Quality 4 Monitored 4 Monitored 4
Education evaluated learner 2022-July  Individual Learning and and
Services progress and 2023 Monitoring Plan (ILMP) evaluated evaluated
achievement  Peer assessment data learner learner
using learner  Sample of learners’ progress and progress and
attainment data output with achievement achievement
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
reflection/self- based on an based on an
assessment existing existing
 Progress grade grade
charts/anecdotal level/depart level/depart
records ment ment
 Class/e-class learning learning
record/grading sheets area report area report
 Lesson plans showing
index of mastery
 Frequency of errors with Timeliness 4 Submitted 4 Submitted 4
identified least/most MOV/s MOV/s
mastered skills monitoring monitoring
and and
 Any equivalent ALS
evaluation evaluation
form/document that
done across done across
highlights the objective
2 quarters 2 quarters
(e.g. Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
 Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
Basic 12. September Any one (1) of the following: Quality 4 Communicated 4 Communicated 4
2022-July promptly and promptly and
Education Communicated  A sample of corrected
2023 clearly using clearly using
Services promptly and various tools various tools
test paper of a learner
clearly the and strategies and strategies
learners’ needs, in a learning area with learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
progress and parent’s or guardians progress and progress and
achievement to achievement to
achievement to signature and date of key key
key stakeholders, receipt stakeholders, stakeholders,
including  Minutes of meetings
including including
parents/guardia parents/guardian
parents/guardians
. (PPST 5.4.2)
with key stakeholders ns, as shown in s, as shown in
the MOV the MOV
(e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT, submitted submitted
CPC) with proof of
attendance
 Report card with
parent’s or guardians
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes Timeliness 4 Showed prompt 4 Showed prompt 4
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
of meeting communication communication
of learners’ of learners’
 Communication with needs progress needs progress
key stakeholders (e.g. and and
achievement achievement
parents/guardians, co- across 2 across 2
teachers, LGU) using quarters quarters
various modalities
 Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
 Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
 Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)

Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a September A reflection/journal entry that Quality 4 Submitted MOV 4 Submitted MOV 4
2022-July that shows the that shows the
Education Growth and personal 16% highlights the application of a
2023 application of a application of a
Services Professional philosophy of learner-centered teaching personal personal
Development teaching that is philosophy in the lesson plan or philosophy of philosophy of
learner-centered community work teaching that is teaching that is
learner-centered learner-centered
(PPST 7.1.2)

Timeliness 5 Applied a 5 Applied a 5

personal personal
philosophy of philosophy of
teaching that is teaching that is
learner- learner-
centeredacross centeredacross
2 quarters 2 quarters

Basic 14. Set September 1. Certification fron the ICT Quality 4 Applied personal 4 Applied personal 4
2022-July philosophy of philosophy of
Education professional Coordinator/School Head/
2023 teaching that is teaching that is
Services development
Focal Person incharge e- learner-centered learner-centered
goals based on across 2 across 2
SAT) quarters quarters
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form
Standards for
(MRF)
Teachers. (PPST Efficiency 5 Submitted 4 5 Submitted 4 5
7.5.2) 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from acceptable acceptable
Phase II MOVs MOVs

Timeliness 5 All four (4) 5 All four (4) 5

submitted MOVs submitted MOVs
were were
accomplished accomplished
within the within the
prescribed prescribed
RPMS Phase RPMS Phase

Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed September Any one (1) proof of: Quality 4 Communicated 4 Communicated 4
2022-July promptly and promptly and
Education various related clearly using clearly using
Services works/activities 2023 • committee involvement; various tools various tools
that contribute to • involvement asmodule/ and strategies and strategies
the teaching- learningmaterial learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
progress and progress and
learning process. writer/validator; achievement to achievement to
• involvement as a resource key key
stakeholders, stakeholders,
person/speaker/learning including including
faciltator in the parents/guardia parents/guardian
ns, as shown in s, as shown in
RO/SDO/school-initiated TV- the MOV the MOV
/radio-based instruction; submitted submitted
• book or journalauthorship/
contributorship;
• advisorship/coordinatorship/
chairpersonship;
• participation indemonstration
teaching;
• participation asresearch
presenter in aforum/
conference; RATING FOR OVERALL Satisfactory 3.45
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
• mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers;
• conducted research within the
rating period;
• others (please specify) with
annotations on how it
contributed to the teaching-
learning process.

KAREN S. BACALSO LESTER R. PARADILLO SEGUNDINA C. RAMOS

Head Teacher VI Teacher I Principal IV
Rater Ratee Approving Authority