Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Basic 4. 10. Designed, September 21% Classroom Observation Quality 4 No acceptable 4 No acceptable 4
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education Assessment selected, Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
2023 shown shown
Services and organized and or inter-observer
Reporting used diagnostic, agreement form/sdone through
formative and onsite /face-to-face/in-person
summative classroom observation.
assessment
strategies If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
consistent with classes are not implemented, Efficiency 4 No acceptable 4 No acceptable 4
evidence was evidence was
curriculum through observation of shown shown
requirements. synchronous/asynchron
(PPST 5.1.2) ous teaching in other
modalities; or
through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 11. Monitored and September Any one (1) of the following: Quality 4 Monitored 4 Monitored 4
Education evaluated learner 2022-July Individual Learning and and
Services progress and 2023 Monitoring Plan (ILMP) evaluated evaluated
achievement Peer assessment data learner learner
using learner Sample of learners’ progress and progress and
attainment data output with achievement achievement
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
reflection/self- based on an based on an
assessment existing existing
Progress grade grade
charts/anecdotal level/depart level/depart
records ment ment
Class/e-class learning learning
record/grading sheets area report area report
Lesson plans showing
index of mastery
Frequency of errors with Timeliness 4 Submitted 4 Submitted 4
identified least/most MOV/s MOV/s
mastered skills monitoring monitoring
and and
Any equivalent ALS
evaluation evaluation
form/document that
done across done across
highlights the objective
2 quarters 2 quarters
(e.g. Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
Basic 12. September Any one (1) of the following: Quality 4 Communicated 4 Communicated 4
2022-July promptly and promptly and
Education Communicated A sample of corrected
2023 clearly using clearly using
Services promptly and various tools various tools
test paper of a learner
clearly the and strategies and strategies
learners’ needs, in a learning area with learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
progress and parent’s or guardians progress and progress and
achievement to achievement to
achievement to signature and date of key key
key stakeholders, receipt stakeholders, stakeholders,
including Minutes of meetings
including including
parents/guardia parents/guardian
parents/guardians
. (PPST 5.4.2)
with key stakeholders ns, as shown in s, as shown in
the MOV the MOV
(e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT, submitted submitted
CPC) with proof of
attendance
Report card with
parent’s or guardians
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes Timeliness 4 Showed prompt 4 Showed prompt 4
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
of meeting communication communication
of learners’ of learners’
Communication with needs progress needs progress
key stakeholders (e.g. and and
achievement achievement
parents/guardians, co- across 2 across 2
teachers, LGU) using quarters quarters
various modalities
Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a September A reflection/journal entry that Quality 4 Submitted MOV 4 Submitted MOV 4
2022-July that shows the that shows the
Education Growth and personal 16% highlights the application of a
2023 application of a application of a
Services Professional philosophy of learner-centered teaching personal personal
Development teaching that is philosophy in the lesson plan or philosophy of philosophy of
learner-centered community work teaching that is teaching that is
learner-centered learner-centered
(PPST 7.1.2)
Basic 14. Set September 1. Certification fron the ICT Quality 4 Applied personal 4 Applied personal 4
2022-July philosophy of philosophy of
Education professional Coordinator/School Head/
2023 teaching that is teaching that is
Services development
Focal Person incharge e- learner-centered learner-centered
goals based on across 2 across 2
SAT) quarters quarters
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form
Standards for
(MRF)
Teachers. (PPST Efficiency 5 Submitted 4 5 Submitted 4 5
7.5.2) 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from acceptable acceptable
Phase II MOVs MOVs
Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed September Any one (1) proof of: Quality 4 Communicated 4 Communicated 4
2022-July promptly and promptly and
Education various related clearly using clearly using
Services works/activities 2023 • committee involvement; various tools various tools
that contribute to • involvement asmodule/ and strategies and strategies
the teaching- learningmaterial learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
progress and progress and
learning process. writer/validator; achievement to achievement to
• involvement as a resource key key
stakeholders, stakeholders,
person/speaker/learning including including
faciltator in the parents/guardia parents/guardian
ns, as shown in s, as shown in
RO/SDO/school-initiated TV- the MOV the MOV
/radio-based instruction; submitted submitted
• book or journalauthorship/
contributorship;
• advisorship/coordinatorship/
chairpersonship;
• participation indemonstration
teaching;
• participation asresearch
presenter in aforum/
conference; RATING FOR OVERALL Satisfactory 3.45
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
• mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers;
• conducted research within the
rating period;
• others (please specify) with
annotations on how it
contributed to the teaching-
learning process.