You are on page 1of 4

The Journal for Vascular Ultrasound 32(3):129–132, 2008

Common Carotid Intimal-medial Thickness Is


Associated with Coronary In-stent Restenosis
Gregory T. Jones;1 A. M. van Rij;1 G. B. Hill;1 G. T. Wilkins;2 M. J. A. Williams2

ABSTRACT Introduction.—Coronary artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) consists of a rapid vascu-


lar smooth muscle cell proliferation after stent placement. This study tested the hypothesis that
carotid artery intimal thickening may be associated with susceptibility to coronary ISR.
Methods.—Coronary stent treated patients with (ISR, n = 81) and without (ISR-free, n = 163)
ISR were examined along with age- and gender-matched vascular disease-free controls (n = 200).
All participants underwent bilateral carotid duplex ultrasound assessment and cardiovascular
risk factor evaluation. Multiple logistic regressions were used to determine the independence of
any risk associations with either coronary artery disease or ISR.
Results.—Maximal carotid intimal medial thickness was independently associated with symp-
tomatic coronary ISR, with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.5–7.7, p <
0.005 for carotid intimal medial thickness >1 mm). Atherosclerosis within the carotid bifurcation
and internal carotid artery, as measured by carotid stenosis scores, was significantly greater in
both coronary artery patient groups compared with vascular disease-free controls but was not
associated with ISR.
Conclusions.—Intimal thickening within the common carotid artery may represent a distinct
pathological process from that which occurs within the carotid bifurcation and internal carotid
arteries. Changes in common carotid IMT appears to represent an independent risk indicator for
symptomatic coronary ISR.

Introduction insertion were recruited retrospectively from the


Dunedin Hospital Cardiology Clinical database. A
Coronary bare metal in-stent restenosis (ISR) is
group of 81 consecutive patients with a history of
characterized by smooth muscle cellular migration
symptomatic, angiographically proven, in-stent reste-
and proliferation around the stent strut. Although
nosis (ISR CAD) were compared with a consecutive
drug-eluting stents have significantly reduced this
series of 163 patients who were angina free for more
problem, it still remains a clinical entity, albeit in a
than 1 year after their stent placement (ISR-free CAD).
smaller group of patients. A number of demographic
The ISR CAD group included patients who had un-
and clinical risk factors for ISR have been identified,
dergone repeat percutaneous intervention or coronary
including waist-to-hip ratio, low-level chronic sys-
artery bypass surgery for ISR and were then free of
temic inflammation, preinterventional lesion charac-
symptoms and cardiovascular events for at least 6
teristics, and the number, diameter, and length of
months. The vast majority (96.9%) of patients were of
stents inserted.1–3
European ethnicity, with the remainder being New
Common carotid artery (CCA) intimal medial thick-
Zealand Mâori (2.3%) or Asian (0.6%).
ening4 shares histopathological similarities with coro-
Coronary angiograms in all patients were analyzed
nary ISR,5 which are distinct from that of atheroscle-
by an experienced cardiologist, with the extent of coro-
rotic plaques. The a priori hypothesis of this study was
nary artery disease expressed as the number of vessel
that carotid artery intimal thickening, particularly
territories (left anterior descending, left circumflex, and
with the common carotid segment, may be associated
right coronary arteries) with one or more stenoses of
with the occurrence of coronary ISR.
ⱖ50% of the vessel normal reference diameter using
visual assessment of lesion severity. CAD extent was
Methods
expressed as single-, double-, or triple-vessel CAD.
Patients with angiographically proven coronary ar- The American College of Cardiology/American Heart
tery disease (CAD) and coronary bare-metal stent Association (AHA/ACC) classification6 was used to
evaluate the morphology of coronary lesions at the
index coronary angiogram. Follow-up angiography
From the Sections of 1Surgery and 2Medicine, University of was analyzed in the restenosis group with the defini-
Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Address correspondence to: Gregory T. Jones, Vascular Research tion of restenosis being diameter stenosis ⱖ50% of the
Group, Section of Surgery, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, vessel reference diameter by visual assessment at the
New Zealand. E-mail: greg.jones@otago.ac.nz site of the lesion treated with the stent observed in at
130 JONES ET AL. JVU 32(3)

least one of multiple projections. The single most se- studies.10–12 Binary cIMT and carotid stenosis scores
vere view was used to categorize the pattern of reste- were assessed with the Chi-squared test.
nosis as proposed by Mehran et al.7 for classification Multiple logistic regressions were used to test the
of in-stent restenotic lesions. interactive effects of other variables on the observed
A group of 200 elderly control subjects (97.1% Eu- association between cIMT and in-stent restenosis. Sig-
ropean) was recruited from the same geographical re- nificant or suggestive (p < 0.15) confounders of either
gion as the CAD cohort. These patients had no history patient group, cIMT, or carotid stenosis scores were
of ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, identified and included in the winnowed model (waist
ischemic stroke, or abdominal aortic aneurysm. circumference, plasma high sensitivity C-reactive pro-
A detailed record of each individual’s current medi- tein [hs-CRP], extent of coronary disease, AHA/ACC
cations, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and risk lesion classification, total stent(s) length, number of
factor history, including previous history of hyperten- sites stented, and average stent diameter).
sion, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, other vascular dis- Results are expressed as means ± one standard
eases, and smoking history, was collected from all par- deviation, except non-Gaussian variables, which are
ticipants. One smoking pack year was defined as 20 expressed as medians and interquartile range. Odds
cigarettes (1 pack) per day for 1 year. All subjects gave ratios are expressed with 95% confidence intervals. A
written informed consent before they were recruited p value <0.05 was considered significant.
into this study, and the investigation conformed to the
principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Results
All 444 participants underwent carotid duplex ul-
trasound (7–12 MHz; ATL, Philips Medical Systems) Demographic differences between ISR CAD and
assessment. Bilateral far-wall common carotid intimal- ISR-free CAD patients included coronary disease se-
medial thicknesses (cIMTs) were measured 1 cm proxi- verity, coronary lesion score, stent characteristics
mal from the bifurcation, in accordance with the Mann- (length, diameter, and number of segments), medica-
heim carotid IMT consensus statement.8 The presence tions and plasma hs-CRP levels (Tables 1 and 2). Vas-
of carotid stenoses, within the internal carotid arteries cular disease-free controls had lower rates of hyper-
(ICA), was assessed using the Australasian Society for tension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, smoking,
Ultrasound in Medicine clinical protocol (D14)9 for body mass index, and plasma hs-CRP along with
color duplex ultrasound extracranial carotid disease greater plasma high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol
(carotid stenosis score). In brief, each patient was bi- levels compared with both coronary disease groups
laterally scored for degree of stenosis as (0) no steno- (Table 1).
sis, (1) <15%. (2) 16–49%, (3) 50–69%, (4) 70–79%, (5) Maximal common cIMT were significantly greater in
80–99%, or (6) occluded. ISR patients compared with either ISR-free (p < 0.03) or
Statistical analysis was performed with StatView vascular disease-free controls (p < 0.0008). However,
version 5.01 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Each patient’s there was no difference between the disease-free con-
maximal cIMT or carotid stenosis score values were trols and the ISR-free CAD patients. Similarly, the per-
used for subsequent statistical analysis. Because the centage of ISR patients with cIMT >1 mm was signifi-
cIMT was not normally distributed, this variable was cantly greater than in the ISR-free or control groups
assessed with the Mann-Whitney U-test. Maximal (Table 2).
CCA IMT >1 mm was applied as the binary cut-off for Calcium channel antagonist (p < 0.005) and nitrate
abnormal arterial wall thickening as per previous (p < 0.02) medication were used more frequently in

Table 1
Demographic Characteristics of Controls and CAD Groups
Control, ISR-free CAD, ISR CAD, p Value, Control p Value, ISR Free CAD
n = 200 n = 163 n = 81 vs. CAD vs. CAD ISR
Age, years 67.3 ± 6.3 63.8 ± 9.1 62.5 ± 9.0 <0.001 NSD
Gender, % male 77.6 68.7 67.9 NSD NSD
Hypertension, % 22.2 43.8 42.5 <0.001 NSD
Hypercholesterolemia, % 27.8 50.6 43.8 <0.001 NSD
Diabetes, % 2.0 16.0 15.0 <0.001 NSD
Smoking history, pack years 8.0 ± 14.3 20.1 ± 27.0 20.1 ± 24.6 <0.0001 NSD
HDL cholesterol, mmol/L 1.3 ± 0.4 1.2 ± 0.4 1.1 ± 0.3 <0.01 NSD
hsCRP, mg/mL, median (IQR) 1.2 (0.3–2.1) 1.9 (0.3–3.2) 2.5 (2.0–4.0) <0.001 <0.06
Body mass index 25.8 ± 3.8 27.9 ± 4.4 28.8 ± 4.4 <0.0001 NSD
Waist circumference (cm) 95.8 ± 10.8 96.7 ± 11.6 99.1 ± 12.6 NSD vs. ISR-free NSD
<0.0006 vs. ISR

Data are presented as means ± 1 SD or median with interquartile ranges (IQR).


CAD = coronary artery disease; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; hsCRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ISR = in-stent
restenosis; NSD = no significant difference.
2008 CAROTID IMT IS INCREASED IN CORONARY IN-STENT RESTENOSIS 131

Table 2
Demographic Characteristics of Controls and CAD Groups
p Value,
Control, ISR-free CAD, ISR CAD, p Value, ISR Free CAD
n = 200 n = 163 n = 81 Control vs. CAD vs. CAD ISR
Maximal cIMT (mm), 0.8 (0.7–0.9) 0.8 (0.65–0.95) 1.0 (0.8–1.2) NSD <0.03
median, IQR
Mean ± 1 SD 0.8 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 0.4 1.1 ± 0.9
Maximal cIMT ⱖ1 mm, % 24.2 27.6 50.6 NSD vs. ISR-free <0.0005
<0.0001 vs. CAD ISR
Carotid Stenosis Score, % 98.0, 2.0, 0 92.5, 5.0, 2.5 93.9, 5.5, 0.6 <0.03 NSD
0–1, 2–3, 4–6

Data are presented as means ± 1 SD or median with interquartile ranges (IQR). Maximal carotid intima media thickness
(cIMT) was able to significantly differentiate between in-stent restenosis (ISR) and ISR-free coronary artery disease (CAD)
patients. Carotid stenosis scores were significant greater in CAD versus controls but not significant different (NSD) between
ISR and ISR-free CAD patients.

ISR CAD subjects (Table 3) and, therefore, were included onstrate an independent association between cIMT
in the logistic regression model. The univariant odds and coronary artery ISR.
ratio for maximal cIMT >1 mm was 2.7 (95% confi- Lacroix and colleagues13 investigated whether cIMT
dence interval, 1.5–4.7, p < 0.0006) and when adjusted was associated with events (death, nonfatal myocar-
for confounding risk factors (CAD severity, index dial infarction, the recurrence of angina, hospitaliza-
AHA/ACC lesion score, number of sites stented, stent tion for heart failure, new positive exercise test) after
length, stent diameter, waist circumference, hsCRP percutaneous coronary angioplasty. They demon-
and medications.) this remained significant at 3.4 (95% strated, in a univariate analysis, that coronary patients
CI, 1.5–7.7, p < 0.005). with CCA IMT >0.7 mm had an increased risk of car-
In contrast, carotid stenosis scores, an indicator of diac events after coronary angioplasty compared with
atherosclerotic burden within the carotid bifurcation, those with cIMT <0.7 mm (p = 0.03). Although no
was not significantly different between CAD groups evidence of independent association appeared to be
but was higher in both CAD groups compared with observed by multivariate analysis and angioplasty re-
the vascular disease-free controls (Table 2). stenosis was not directly assessed, this study did at
least indicate that cIMT may be linked to postinter-
Discussion ventional outcome events.
Although abnormal carotid and femoral artery wall
A number of demographic and clinical markers thickening has been linked with the severity of coro-
have been implicated as risk factors for coronary nary artery disease the inclusion of measures within
ISR.1–3 These confounding parameters were therefore the carotid bifurcation appears to be a key component
included in the multiple logistic analyses used to de- of these risk associations.11 Recently, age-adjusted in-
termine the independence of any risk associations be- travascular ultrasound measurements of both coro-
tween carotid ultrasound measurements and coronary nary percentage of atheromatous volume and coro-
ISR. To our knowledge, this is the first study to dem- nary IMT have been shown to significantly correlate

Table 3
Angiographic and Clinical Features of CAD Patients
ISR-free CAD, ISR CAD, p
n = 163 n = 81 Value
CAD severity, % 1, 2, 3 vessels diseased 44.7, 36.4, 18.9 39.0, 27.3, 33.7 <0.06
Index AHA/ACC lesion score, % A, B1, B2, C 14.5, 37.7, 33.3, 14.5 11.3, 31.3, 18.7, 38.7 <0.0004
Total stent length inserted, mm 22.1 ± 11.2 29.9 ± 17.3 <0.0008
Average stent diameter, mm 3.2 ± 0.5 3.0 ± 0.6 <0.06
Number of sites stented 1.2 ± 0.5 1.4 ± 0.7 <0.07
Medications
Ca2+ antagonists, % treated 21.8 36.0 <0.03
Fibrates, % treated 8.4 12.0 NSD
Nitrates, % treated 20.7 42.9 <0.0007
Statins, % treated 93.7 93.7 NSD

Data are presented as percentages or means ± 1 SD. Significant difference between both clinical and angiographic criteria
were noted between ISR and ISR-free coronary disease patients, as previously reported.1,2
AHA/ACC = American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; CAD = coronary artery disease; ISR = in-stent
restenosis.
132 JONES ET AL. JVU 32(3)

with carotid bifurcation IMT but not common carotid 2. Jones GT, Kay IP, Chu JW, et al. Elevated plasma active matrix
metalloproteinase-9 level is associated with coronary artery in-stent
IMT,14 indicating that the carotid atherosclerotic bur- restenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2006;26:e121–e125.
den is the associative factor. Although variance in IMT 3. Radke PW, Voswinkel M, Reith M, et al. Relation of fasting
at difference carotid artery sites has been well re- insulin plasma levels to restenosis after elective coronary stent im-
ported, these have largely been attributed to localized plantation in patients without diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 2004;
differences in temporal phases of the same (atheroscle- 93:639–641.
rotic) process. 4. Mosse PR, Campbell GR, Campbell JH. Smooth muscle pheno-
typic expression in human carotid arteries. II. Atherosclerosis-free dif-
We propose an alternative interpretation based on fuse intimal thickenings compared with the media. Arteriosclerosis
differences in the underlying localized pathogenic 1986;6:664–669.
processes within distinct carotid segments. Although 5. Skowasch D, Jabs A, Andrie R, et al. Pathogen burden, inflam-
changes in cIMT are largely associated with a fibro- mation, proliferation and apoptosis in human in-stent restenosis.
muscular intimal thickening, these changes appear Tissue characteristics compared to primary atherosclerosis. J Vasc
Res 2004;41:525–534.
pathophysiologically distinct from the fibro fatty ath- 6. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, et al. Coronary mor-
erosclerotic lesions known to be localized within the phologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with an-
neighboring carotid bifurcation.4 In this study, mea- gioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient
surements of carotid bifurcation stenosis appeared to selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circula-
be associated with systemic atherosclerosis, as indi- tion 1990;82:1193–1202.
7. Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, et al. Angiographic patterns
cated by increased carotid bifurcation stenosis scores of in-stent restenosis: Classification and implications for long-term
in both CAD groups compared with healthy controls. outcome. Circulation 1999;100:1872–1878.
This result appears consistent with recent coronary 8. Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, et al. Mannheim carotid
investigations in which the authors used intravascular intima-media thickness consensus (2004–2006). An update on behalf
ultrasound.14 In contrast, cIMT was only significantly of the Advisory Board of the 3rd and 4th Watching the Risk Sym-
posium, 13th and 15th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim,
increased in those CAD patients with a history of ISR. Germany, 2004, and Brussels, Belgium, 2006. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;
The composition of coronary ISR is distinct from that 23:75–80.
of de novo atherosclerotic lesions, with ISR being hy- 9. ASUM. Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine
percellular and having relatively low numbers of mac- homepage. Available at: www.asum.com.au. Accessed June 20, 2008
rophages.5 We suggest that ISR and cIMT may share 10. Cheng KS, Mikhailidis DP, Hamilton G, et al. A review of the
carotid and femoral intima-media thickness as an indicator of the
pathogenic similarities distinct from that of systemic presence of peripheral vascular disease and cardiovascular risk fac-
atherosclerosis. tors. Cardiovasc Res 2002;54:528–538.
In conclusion, maximal cIMT is significantly in- 11. Lekakis JP, Papamichael C, Papaioannou TG, et al. Intima-
creased in patients with coronary artery bare metal media thickness score from carotid and femoral arteries predicts the
ISR. This association appears to be independent of extent of coronary artery disease: intima-media thickness and CAD.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2005;21:495–501.
known demographic and clinical confounders of ISR 12. O’Leary DH, Polak JF. Intima-media thickness: A tool for
and warrants further investigation to determine the atherosclerosis imaging and event prediction. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:
predictive power of this non-invasive assessment tool. 18L–21L.
13. Lacroix P, Aboyans V, Espaliat E, et al. Carotid intima-media
thickness as predictor of secondary events after coronary angio-
Acknowledgment. This study was funded with a Grant-in-aid from
plasty. Int Angiol 2003;22:279–283.
the Dunedin Heart Unit Trust.
14. Amato M, Montorsi P, Ravani A, et al. Carotid intima-media
thickness by B-mode ultrasound as surrogate of coronary athero-
References sclerosis: correlation with quantitative coronary angiography and
1. Bauters C, Hubert E, Prat A, et al. Predictors of restenosis after coronary intravascular ultrasound findings. Eur Heart J 2007;28:
coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1291–1298. 2094–2101.

You might also like