AI BASED FLARE EVENTS PREDICTION AND PREVENTION SYSTEM

Literature Review:-
In the field of oil and gas sector, the flaring process is used as a conduit to depressurize
components that might be crucial over-pressure routes. One of its most important components
of an oil and natural gas infrastructure is the flaring process. It protects the operation of the
facility in the event of over-pressure fault conditions, which may happen during unit initiation
or termination, as well as a result of unexpected processing parameters or malfunction. As a
result, gas flaring has the potential to halt certain assembly lines or the complete facility [1].
Prediction of gas emissions has received increasing attention as a result of changes in
environmental hazards and energy usage. Carbon dioxide, Nitrogen dioxide and Sulfur
dioxide are among the greenhouse gases that are known to be the main contributors to the
world's observed changes in climate. Amongst these organic compounds, carbon dioxide is
regarded as the main gas that inspired researchers to investigate techniques for reducing and
mitigating carbon emissions. Since greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have shown to have the
greatest effects on environmental concerns, forecasting CO2 emissions has emerged as a
global priority. Anticipating CO2 emissions is another crucial step in raising public
understanding of environmental issues. Choosing the most appropriate methodologies for
predicting CO2 emissions depends on a large array of quantitative and qualitative parameters.
Popular techniques include those primarily utilizing standard computer-based modeling,
artificial intelligence, linear regression and the optimum growth model [2].
The present research's primary goals for studying Greenhouse gases emissions in the oil and
gas sector revolve mostly on emission estimating methods and emission mitigation methods
[3-11]. The accuracy and quality of approaches used to monitor, measure, and predict
greenhouse gas emissions significantly vary, particularly in the oil and gas sector and an
onshore oil and gas exploration's Greenhouse gas discharge [7][12]. They contend that
various methodologies will result in various emission estimations. In order to create an
emission inventories that accurately represents the activities of the Oil and gas industry
sector, a systematic and precise approach must be used [3]. Goldenberg suggests using
a process-based emission factor that can provide statistics that is of better caliber [4]. Ibemere
& Mmata concur with him and recommend a laboratory technique to offer more accurate,
trustworthy, and traceable results and decrease uncertainty [6]. According to Chen et al.,
Emissions of greenhouse gases that are computed using a certain emission factor depending
upon gas composition are technically better appropriate [7]. The burning of fossil fuels, the
purposeful release of gas into the environment for operational purposes (venting), gas flaring,
and industrial discharges from vents, hubs, connections, pumps, compressor seal leakage, etc.
are the main sources of GHG emissions in the upstream oil and gas sector [13].
As suggested by Wang et al,[14] the strengths of ARIMA and ANNs when combined to form
a hybrid model, which is exceptional in that it can simulate both linear and nonlinear patterns
in the data set. Additionally, the computational results demonstrate the new combination
model's ability to produce forecasts that are more accurate than those produced by older
approaches [14]. To utilize the varied features of ARIMA and Artificial neural networks in
nonlinear and linear modelling, a hybrid approach that combines both ARIMA and Artificial
neural networks was implemented. The findings also indicated that combining the approaches
can improve the prediction performance of each method individually [15].
Beijing-STELLA Model was created by Feng et al. [16] as a network dynamics-based
proposed simulation platform for assessment and forecast of urban energy usage patterns and
emissions of carbon dioxide in the Beijing city throughout the period of 2005 to 2030. In
consideration of the research aim and available data, this simulation model was constructed
as a composite of six sub-models, including residential, service, industrial, socioeconomic,
industrial  and agricultural and commuting sub-models. According to the findings, Beijing's
total energy consumption would increase by 1.04 times by 2030, from its current figure of
55.99 million tonnes of coal equivalent (Mtce) to 114.30 million tonnes. The energy
consumption and carbon emission variables were used to predict the expected CO2
emissions. Therefore, the total carbon dioxide emissions in 2030 will be 169.67 million
tonnes Carbon dioxide equivalents (Mt CO2-eq), which is 0.43 times more than in 2005.
According to the sensitivity study, altering the economic approach to development and
regulating sensible population growth would have a significant impact on energy use and
greenhouse gas emissions [16].
To anticipate and scrutinize Emissions of carbon dioxide in China, Li et al, [17] also
advocated using time series and a form of neural network called Radial Basis Function
(RBF). It investigates the Radial Basis Function neural network's prudence and adaptability
in predicting Carbon dioxide emission. In this study, overall energy use was transformed to
Emissions of CO2. Statistics for the period of 1990 to 2010 were collected. The practical
findings demonstrated the improved function approximation and excellent accuracy rate of
the Radial Basis Function neural network [17].
By utilizing sectoral energy usage as an indicator, Sozen et al. [18] developed an equation
with the support of artificial neural network to estimate Turkey's greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions. The resulting equations were then used to forecast Greenhouse gas levels and
develop plans for reducing the contribution of various sectors to overall emissions. The
volatile organic compounds (E) included emissions of non-methane, carbon dioxide (CO),
carbon monoxide (CO), , nitrous dioxide (NO2), and sulphur dioxide (SO2). Between 2007
through 2020, the Greenhouse gas emissions were forecasted. Scaled conjugate gradient and
Levenberg-Marquadt were two variations of the method used in the research. Statistical error
metrics including R2, root mean square (RMS), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE)
of testing and training samples were assessed to confirm the Artificial Neural Network
approach's approximation. Values of R2 in this research were significantly higher than those
in prior investigations and were within acceptable bounds. Additionally, the error levels were
sufficiently minimal. The optimum methodology for the synthetic version was the
Levenberg-Marquadt with 8 neurons, which was reliant on the output's overall energy
utilization (Greenhouse gas emissions). The research findings, in summary, demonstrated that
the Artificial Neural Network’s estimate capabilities were quite strong, particularly when the
testing data were not deployed to train the Artificial Neural Network [18].
The Artificial Neural Network is the most popular method. It has attracted more attention
mainly because of its robustness. The techniques are actually different kinds of artificial
intelligence (AI) technologies, that are widely recognized for being trustworthy ways to do
forecasts, estimating, and assessing.
References:-

[1] Giuliani, M., Camarda, G., Montini, M., Cadei, L., Bianco, A., Shokry, A., Baraldi, P., & Zio, E. (2019).
Flaring events prediction and prevention through advanced big data analytics and machine learning
algorithms. Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition 2019, OMC 2019, January.

[2] Abdullah, L., & Pauzi, H. M. (2015). Methods in forecasting carbon dioxide emissions: A decade review.
Jurnal Teknologi, 75(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.2603

[3] Lev-On, M., Ritter, K., & Retzsch, W. (2001). Development of consistent methodology for estimating
greenhouse gas emissions from oil and gas industry facilities and operations. Society of Petroleum
Engineers - SPE/EPA/DOE Exploration and Production Environmental Conference 2001, EPEC 2001.
https://doi.org/10.2118/66650-ms

[4] Third, K., Shaw, A., Bridle, T., & Cooper, S. (2008). Accounting for greenhouse gas emissions in
wastewater treatment. Water, 35(8), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/23083

[5] Allen, D. T., Torres, V. M., Thomas, J., Sullivan, D. W., Harrison, M., Hendler, A., Herndon, S. C., Kolb, C.
E., Fraser, M. P., Hill, A. D., Lamb, B. K., Miskimins, J., Sawyer, R. F., & Seinfeldi, J. H. (2013).
Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(44), 17768–17773.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304880110

[6] Third, K., Shaw, A., Bridle, T., & Cooper, S. (2008). Accounting for greenhouse gas emissions in
wastewater treatment. Water, 35(8), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/23083

[7] Chen, G., Yang, S., Lv, C., Zhong, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, Z., Fang, X., Li, S., Yang, W., & Xue, L. (2017).
An improved method for estimating GHG emissions from onshore oil and gas exploration and development in
China. Science of the Total Environment, 574, 707–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.051

[8] Pinem, S., Karuniasa, M., & Abdini, C. (2020). Estimating GHG Emission Level from Oil and Gas Offshore
Production Facility. E3S Web of Conferences, 202. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020209004

[9] Johnson, M. R., & Coderre, A. R. (2011). An analysis of flaring and venting activity in the Alberta upstream
oil and gas industry. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995), 61(2), 190–200.
https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.61.2.190

[10] Borba, B. S. M. C., Lucena, A. F. P., Rathmann, R., Costa, I. V. L., Nogueira, L. P. P., Rochedo, P. R. R.,
Castelo Branco, D. A., Júnior, M. F. H., Szklo, A., & Schaeffer, R. (2012). Energy-related climate change
mitigation in Brazil: Potential, abatement costs and associated policies. Energy Policy, 49(2012), 430–441.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.040

[11] Konschnik, Kate & Jordaan, Sarah. (2018). Reducing fugitive methane emissions from the North American
oil and gas sector: a proposed science-policy framework. Climate Policy. 18. 1-19.
10.1080/14693062.2018.1427538.

[12] Dianita, C., Saputra, A. H., & Almagistra, M. B. P. (2018). Estimating greenhouse gas emission level of a
natural gas transmission pipeline from point A to B in West Java based on INGAA and IPCC guidelines. IOP
Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 105(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/105/1/012118

[13] Choudhary, P., Srivastava, R. K., & De, S. (2018). Integrating Greenhouse gases (GHG) assessment for
low carbon economy path: Live case study of Indian national oil company. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198,
351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.032

[14] L. Wang, H. Zou, J. Su, L. Li, and S. Chaudhry, “An ARIMAANN hybrid model for time series
forecasting,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 244–259, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2179
[15] Zhang, P. G. (2003). Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model.
Neurocomputing, 50, 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00702-0

[16] Feng, Y. Y., Chen, S. Q., & Zhang, L. X. (2013). System dynamics modeling for urban energy
consumption and CO2 emissions: A case study of Beijing, China. Ecological Modelling, 252(1), 44–52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.09.008

[17] Li, S., R. Zhou, X. Ma, 2010. The Forecast of CO2 Emissions in China based on RBF Neural Networks. In:
Industrial and Information Systems (IIS), 2nd International Conference 2010. 319-322.
https://doi.org/10.1109/INDUSIS.2010.5565845

[18] Sozen, Adnan & Gulseven, Zafer & Arcaklioglu, Erol, 2007. "Forecasting based on sectoral energy
consumption of GHGs in Turkey and mitigation policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 6491-
6505, December. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.024.