7 = PLAINTIFF / PETITIONER | COMPLAINANT / APPELLANT / DECREE HOLDER ETC. Now PLEASE FILL UP ALL THE RELEVANT FIELDS & () FIELDS ARE MANDATORY 1. | Name of the Pain L Implant / Etc, Sool Jub? 2.1 Slo Dic : " : woe ~ Sagar Singh Raiauriya 3. | Address Rlo€- 27/770, IS Colony Poot - J Thdso Camp, Chofla plasanpue Dethi 4 | Aadnarcardno. | 74 10 5879 2698 Pin Code 0092 T ri TNDIAN 5. | Gender Male ( ) Female Other ‘Nationality ome 6. | Date of Birth ! i Age 7. | Mobile No. 9990699 32 2 oman: 8. | Act/ Section we l3 (B) (2) 8. | Valuation of Suit court Fes Kecereied ‘Court Fee Paid / Deposted 10.| Police Station Moder Vihar In Criminal Matters onty 11.| FIR. No. & Year “uy / 2017 In Criminal Matters only s. DEFENDANT / ACCUSED / RESPONDENT JUDGEMENT DEBATER ETC. No. PLEASE FILL UP ALL THE RELEVANT FIELDS & () FIELDS ARE MANDATORY 1. | Name ofthe of DEFENDANT / ACCUSED $h~ Gogo. Singh Rajaurt4q te 2. | Slo Wio Dio oh om Putt Rayauxya 3. | Address Village Romi magia Hay wt , Rampur, Shah Aer, PS chawltS, Liste Aligarh. ver Panciesh 4. | Aadhar Card No. Pin Code 5. | Gender Nationality ct Other: 6. | Date of Birth 7 7 ‘Age L 7. | Mobile No. [emai ae ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF / COMPLAINANT / PETITIONER / DECREE HOLDER ETC. 1. | Name of The Advocate (Ae Enrl, No. i >ani (Advocate) 2. | Office / Chamber No. En eon 3. | Mobile No. e-mail e oo ° ‘SUBMITTED BY =... PLAINTIFF / PETITIONER / DEFENDANT / ACCUSED / OTHER / ADVOCATETHE COURT OF LD. PRINC IPA, DISTRICT (SHAD, ‘ HMA PETITION OF 2023 THE MATTER o| Smt Juhi Petitioner No.1 AND. Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya Petitioner No.2 INDEX A US. ISI CPC ON BEHALF QF BOTH THE APPLICANTS FOR WAIVING OFF RIATUTORY PERIOD OF six MONTHS, REQUIRED FOR FILING PETIT} HMA ALOT 1955 WITH SUPPORTING 4.) AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONER NO. AS PER —} AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONER NO.1 & 2 L CHE JUDGMENT OF RAJAT GUPTA VS. RUPATY | 2!~ 2 GUPTA 5. AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONER NO.2 AS PER FF 22 THE JUDGMENT OF RAJAT GUPTA vs. RUPALI GUPTA $.__| LIST OF DOCUMENT WITH DOCUMENTS 83-8] 7._|VAKALATNAMAS _ ub 4] Aue Dayowrdya PETITIONER NO.1 Pl ER NO.2 THROUGH: THROUGH: DELHI DATED: 3- 03. 23ora = (li 10m IN THE COURT OF LD, PRINCIWAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, DISTRICT (SHAHDARA), KARKRDOOMA COURTS, DELHI HMA PETITION __ OF 2023 THE MA R OF: Smt. Juhi W/o Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya D/o Sh. Bhagwan Singh Rlo E-27/70,) Colony Part-I, Indra Camp, Chotta Hasanpur, Delhi-110092 Mob No.8447092576 .. APPLICANT NO.1 VERSUS Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya S/o Sh. Om Dutt Rajauriya Ro Village Rami Mangla Majra, Rampur, Shahpur, Ps-Chandos, District Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, Mobile No-9917605252 .». APPLICANT NO.2 PS.Madhu Vihar REF. FIRST MOTION OF DIVORCE GRANTED ON IN HMA PETITION NO. 571/2022 JOINT APPLICATION U/S. 151 CPC ON BEHALF OF BOTH THE APPLICANTS FOR WAIVING OFF STATUTORY PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS REQUIRED FOR FILING PETITION U/S 13 (B)2) HMA. MOST RESPECTFULLLY SHOWETH: 1. That as referred above, the first motion divorce petition was decided by the Hon’ble Court Concerned on dt 2.1 1.2022.That as a matter of fact, the parties were married to each other on 18.02.2012 according to Hindu Rites and Customs at Delhi However, due to the temperamental differences, habits, tastes, thoughts and increasing incompatibility, the relationship between the parties deteriorated and which resulted that the partics have started living separately from each other w.e.f. 5.06.2016 That later on, with the intervention of the well-wishers, relatives and respective families members, who gathered from both the sides on numbers times and in their presence, several efforts, negotiations and discussions were took place in order to settle all the disputes and grievances between the parties amicably, but no fruitful result came out, however it came that both the parties are neither ready to continue their relationship nor interested to live together as husband and wife with each other and the parties decided to dissolve the marriage by way of filing joint petition amicably from the Hon’ble Court Concemed. The marriage between the parties has broken down irretrievably. That resultantly, the both parties have entered to a Memorandum of Understanding DT.04.03.2022 and as per the said MOU the parties have amicably and voluntarily settled their all disputes and gricvances. The terms and conditions of the MOU are being not repeated herein for avoiding repetition of the facts. That the bare reading of MOU shows that parties have genuinely settled their differences with each other including all their claims. ‘As such the waiting period will prolong their agony and harassment which they have already suffered since their separationWe. 53.06.2016 and now there is no chance of reconciliation between the parties because more than 5 years have been passed away to the parties to live separately with each other and if the statutory period shall not waive for filing the divorce under second Petition, then irreparable loss would be caused to the parties. 6. That the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment titled as “Amardeep Singh Vs. HarveenKaur” has already empowered the trial courts to deal with the matter relating to waiving of statutory period of six months as specified U/s 13(B)(2) HMA. 7. That the time period of one week granted by Hon’ble Supreme Court for filing waiving application has also been expired. 8. That no prejudice is going to be caused if the present application is allowed, if the present application is not allowed the parties shall suffer severally. PRAYER: Itis, therefore, most respectfully prayed before this Hon’ble Court that the statutory period of six months as required for filing petition U/s 13(B)(2) HMA may kindly be waived off and divorce petition of the parties may kindly be taken on record, inthe interest of justice. Delhi 1s / ee Bt Rayos” Applicant No.1 Applitdnt No.2 Through: Through: ) ! SEL COUNSELIN THE COURT OF LD. PRINCIPAL JUDGE: DISTRIC AMILY COURT, HAHDARA, KARKRDOOMA COURTS, DELHI HMA PETITION _ OF 2023 IN THE MATTER O) Smt. Juhi .. Petitioner No.1 AND Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya .. Petitioner No.2 AFFIDAVIT |, Juhi (aged about 32 years) W/o Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya, D/O Sh. Bhagwan Singh, R/o H.No Ro E-27/70,JJ Colony Part-I,Indra Camp, Chotta Hasanpur, Delhi-110092, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under: Ll That I am deponent herein and the applicant No.1 in the above said case and am well conversant with the facts thereof and as such I am competent to swear this affidavit. That I have filed the accompanying application U/s.151 CPC before the Hon’ble Court. The contents of the same may kindly be _gsfead as part and parcel of this affidavit also which are not “2 Teproduced herein for the sake of brevity. ‘That the accompanying application along with affidavit has been drafted by my counsel under my instruction and contents thereof have been read over and explained to me in vernacular, which I admit to be correct. que DEPONENT VERIFICATION: 09 JAN 2073 Verified at Delhi on this 3%? January- 2023 that the contents of my affidavit are true and correct.to my 4 ape ond beter and nothing has been conivealed therefrom)... Bel Aw mY $0, WY, 0/0, $0... ASAT IS \ ‘entiied by DY. Wh age podIN THE COURT OF LD. PRINCIPAL JUDGE: F AMILY Coe DISTRICT SHAHDARA, KARKRDOOMA COURTS, DELI HMA PETITION OF 2023 IN THE MATTER O! ‘Smt. Juhi .. Petitioner No.1 AND Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya Petitioner No.2 AFFIDAVIT 1, Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya (aged about 33 years) S/O Sh. Om Dutt Rajauriya, R/O Village Rami Mangla Majra, Rampur, Shahpur, Ps- Chandos, District Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under: 1. That I am deponent herein and the applicant No.2 in the above said case and am well conversant with the facts thereof and as such I am competent to swear this affidavit 2. That I have filed the accompanying application U/s.151 CPC before the Hon’ble Court. The contents of the same may kindly be read as part and parcel of this affidavit also which are not reproduced herein for the sake of brevity. 3. That the accompanying application along-with affidavit has been @tafted by my counsel under my instruction and contents thereof <8°"haVe been read over and explained to me in vernacular, which I, admit to be correct. ey meet VERIFICATION:- Q3 JAN 2% Verified at Delhi on this 3°? January-2023 that the contents of my affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed therefrom.| 20 i 4 “oman mR ! HL EH . IN THE COURT OF LD, PRINCIPAL JUD MILY COURT, DISTRICT SHAHDARA, KARKRDOOMA COURTS, DELHI \ HMA PETITION _ OF 2023 IN THE MATTER O} Smt. Juhi .. Petitioner No.1 AND Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya .». Petitioner No.2 MEMO OF PARTIES Smt. Juhi Wo Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya D/o Sh. Bhagwan Singh Rio E-27/70,1) Colony Part-I, Indra Camp, Chotta Hasanpur, Delhi-110092 Mob No.8447092576 «. Petitioner No.1 VERSUS, Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya S/o Sh. Om Dutt Rajauriya R/o Village Rami Mangla Majra, Rampur, Shahpur, Ps-Chandos, District Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, Mobile No-9917605252 «+» Petitioner No.2 PS- Madhu Vihar i CLIIY aude Soper Dopey PETITIONER NO.1 PETIT NER NO.2 THROUGH: THROUGH: h CobNseL COUNSEL DELHI DATED - 3:1: 23IN THE COURT OF LD, PRINCIPAL JUDGE: FAMILY COURT. DISTRICT SHATDARA, KARKRDOOMA COURTS, DELHI HMA PETITION OF 2023 IN THE MATTER Smt. Juhi W/o Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya D/o Sh. Bhagwan Singh Rvo E-27/70,1) Colony Part-1, Indra Camp, Chota Hasanpur, Delhi-1 10092 Mob No.8447092576 .. Petitioner No.1 VERSUS, Sh, Sagar Singh Rajauriya S/o Sh. Om Dutt Rajauriya Rlo Village Rami Mangla Majra, Rampur, Shadipur, Ps-Chandos, District Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, Mobile No-9917605252 -.. Petitioner No.2 PS- Madhu Vihar PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE BY WAY OF DECREE OF DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT AS PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 13-B (2) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955. Most respectfully showeth: 1. That both the parties are Hindu by religion and they are law- abiding and peace loving citizen of India and are residing at their respective address. 2, That the marriage of the petitioner no.1 was solemnized with petitioner No.2 on 18.02.2012 according to Hindu Rites, Customs & Ceremony at Marriage Home, Chandos District Aligarh, Uttar3 Pradesh. The atti f h. The affidavits of the parties to the petition are enclosed herewith for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court, That the age status place of residence of both the petitioner before their marriage and at the time of filing the present petition were as under:- PETITIONER NO.1/ WIFE RELIGION, | AGE PLACE OF _ STATUS RESIDENCE At the time of Hindu 21 yrs. | R/o E-27/70, JJ Colony marriage Unmarried Part-1 Indra Camp Chota Hasanpur, Delhi At the time of Hindu | 32 yrs. | -do- filing of the Married petition _ PETITIONER RELIGION, | AGE PLACE OF STATUS | _ RESIDENCE At the time of Hindu, 2 yrs. |Rlo Village Rami marriage Unmarried Mangla Majra, Rampur, Shahpur, District Aligarh, and Uttar Pradesh At the time of Hindu, 33 yrs. | ~do- filing of the Married petition — ‘That after the marriage, the petitioners lived together as husband and wife at the residence of the petitioner No.2 at and the marriage was duly consummated, and one wedlock namely Master Utkarsh child born out from thisThat afler the marriage, the parties to the petition could not live together and pull out their matrimonial life together owing to temperamental disputes and differences, so that they decided to live separately with each other since 05.06,2016and their marriage has been broken down irrevocably and there is no chance of their re-union in future. That after having separated, the parties instituted/filed the following litigations against each other and their family members:- a. A case of Maintenance Petition U/s 125 CrP.C vide Petition MT-2108 /2016 titled-as “Smt. Juhi & Anr.Vs. Sagar Singh Rajauriya” withdraw before the Concemed Ld. Principal Judge, Family Court, and Karkardooma Court, Delhi b. A complaint case U/s 12 DV Act vide CC No.2413/2016 titled as “Smt Juhi Versus Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya &Others” c. Execution Petitions No.17/2020, 23/2020 withdraw before the Ld. Mahila Court, Karkardooma Court, Delhi d. An FIR No.74/2021 U/s 498A/406/34 IPC registered by the petitioner No.1 against the petitioner No.2 and his family members with PS-Madhu Vihar , Delhi. That with the intervention of the parents, well-wishers, friends etc., the parties to the petition have been understood and with due discussion, all the issues and dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and in this regard, they have also entered into an Memorandum of — Understanding/Settlement Deed dt.04.03.2022thereby the petitioners have sorted out their claims,di putes and differences and have agreed to dissolve. their Marriage by mutual consent on the basis of terms and conditions of the said MOU, as follow:- Mis agreed between the parties that both the parties shall dissolve their marriage by filing a petition ws 13-B (1) & (2) of the HMA on the ground of mutual consent before the Hon'ble Family Courts, New Delhi. it. It is further agreed between the parties that after expiry of mandatory prescribed period of six months or any other earlier if any so permitted under the law/Judicial Pronouncement they will file the second motion as contemplated under the HMA,1956, or in any other law and both the parties shall cooperate in entire process of mutual consent divorce Proceedings and shall duly appear before the Hon'ble Court Jor recording of their respective statement as required in law Jor the first and the second motion iti, It is agreed between the parties that the husband shall pay total sum of Rs.9, 00,000/- (Rupees Nine lakh Only) to the /vife as {fall and final settlement against the maintenance towards past, present and future maintenance, permanent alimony, stridhan etc. under the following manner. a. The husband will pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Five Thousand only) in the form of Demand Drafi/Cheque to the wife at the time of statement of the parties under first motion before the Hon'ble Family Courts within the stipulated time period.i) +b. The husband will pay a sum of Rs. 2, 00.000/-(Rupees wo lakh only) in the form of Demand Drafi/Cheque to the wife at the time of recording the statement of the parties in second motion of divorce petition. The husband will pay another sum of Rs.2, 00,000/- (Rupees Two lakh only) in the form of Demand Draft/Cheque to the wife at the time of quashing of the aforesaid FIR No.74/2017 from the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. @. The husband will pay a sum of Rs. 1,50,000(Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) in the form of Demand Draf/Cheque to the wife when she shall withdraw the cases UIS 125 Cr.P.C. from the concerned court on or before the next date of hearing after signing the present MOU. The husband will pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000(Rupees one lakh JSifty thousand only) in the form of Demand Drafi/cheque to the wife when she shall withdraw the cases U/S12 DV from s the concerned court on or before the next date of hearing. . It is agreed between the parties that except receiving the said amount, the wife will not have any right title, interest, claim etc. whatsoever over the movable or immovable properties of husband after granting the divorce subject to the compliance to this agreement. That it further agreed that both the parties shall withdraw all the cases and complaints, filed against each other from the respective courts/authorities in terms of the period as referred above and nothing case or complaint etc. shall remain pending in any authority or courts of law, if found or pending, the same shall be treated as nul! and void.vi vii viii, Ir is , further agreed between the parties that there all rece ae . Proceedings shall be complete within 60 days positively That it further agreed that the second party will move Petition for quashing the Hon ble High a said FIR No.74/2017 before the Court of Dethi and the first party will help and Coreperate in the said quashing petition and will give her required affidavivNOC before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi tis agreed between the parties that the custody of afore-said child shall remain with the petitioner no.l/wife. The petitionerNo.2/husband will not claim the custody of child in future from the wife and shall have no rights to file any guardian petition for the seeking the custody of children. It is agreed between the parties that in the event of default/breach of terms of mutually agreed settlement wife shalll return the amount which she actually received along with the interest @2% per month to the husband. Similarly if the husband commits breach of terms of settlement the said amount shall stand forfeited by wife. It is agreed and undertake not to file any other complaint/Petition/ Execution Petition etc. against each other at any point of time in future in any court of law in India and both the parties hereby agreed to abide by the present settlement as having been reached without any undue influence, pressure or coercion. &vi xii. That the parties I is agre ‘d benween the parties that in the event of failure of the compliance “compliance of the present settlement both the parties shall be at libel oe ey electra ee respective vases/remedies - ich is easesremedies under law which includes proceedings mention herein, have agreed on each and every terms as recorded in the settlement after carefully reading and understanding and appreciating the content, scope and thereof as also the consequences of breach thereof including the payment of fine, penalty as mentioned above. That as per the compliance of the said Settlement/MOU,the divorce petition under first motion was filed by both the parties vide HMA No.571/2022 before the Ld Principal Judge and accordingly, the divorce has been granted on 2.11.2022 by the Ld. court of Ms. Sarita Birbal, Principal Judge Family Court, District Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi and statement of both the parties have also been recorded . Copy of first motion granted on dt 2.11.2022 is annexed herewith . That the petitioner no.1 has already received Rs. 7,00,000 ( Rupees Seven Lakh only) through different modes ie Cash/RTGS/CHEQUE.CD 10, ‘That further in terms of the said settlement MOU. both the parties ‘ne filing the present petition under second motion betore this Hon'ble Court That there is no possibility or probability of reconciliation between the petitioners in future and both the petitioners have not cohabited with each other since 5.06.2016 and as such with the intervention of family members and friends, they have mutually Sereed and decided to dissolve their marriage by way of mutual consent, 12. That the mutual Consent has not been obtained by force, fraud or undue influence. 13. That the petition has not been Presented in collusion with each other, 14, That there is no any necessary or improper delay in filling the Present petition. 15. That there is no ground/no other legal ground why relief claim should not be granted to the petitioners, 16. That the petitioner no.1 is residing at R/o E-27/70,3) Colony Part Indra Camp, Chota Hasanpur, Delhi-110092, which comes within the local territorial jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court and fallen under PS- GTB Enclave, Delhi, hence this Hon’ble CourtCs has got territorial jurisdiction 1 entertain, try and decide the Present petition, 17. That the requisite court fee has been paid and affixed on the petition, PRAYER:- Tris, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass a decree of divorce U/s 13-B-(2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, thereby dissolving the marriage solemnized on 18.2.2012 of the petitioners on the mutual Consent, in the interest of justice, Any other order(s) which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the parties. pubbe Sagerbega yn PETITIONER NO.2 PETITIONER NO.1 THROUGH: THROUGH: eee torso VU INSEL COUNSEL DELHI DATED: 3. J. 23 VERIFICATION:- We the petitioners verified that the contents of para No.1 to!4 are true and correct to our personal knowledge and belief and Para No. tol Fare true and correct as per information received and legal advice received@) and believed to be true and correct, The last para is prayer to this Hon'ble Court Verified at Delhi on this 38? January -2023 fous Sqgan Rogan PETITIONER NO.1 pete RNO.2YX? A PRINCIPAL JUDG HAHDARA, KARKRDOOMA y COURT, URTS, DELHI HMA PETITION __ OF 2023 «- Petitioner No.1 AND Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya - Petitioner No.2 AFFIDAVIT |, Juhi (Age 32 years) W/o Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya D/o Sh. Bhagwan Singh, Ro E-27/70, 13 Colony Part-1, Indra Camp, Chota Hasanpur, Delhi-110092, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under: = That I am deponent herein and the petitioner No.1/wife in the above noted matter and am well conversant with the facts and _steumstances ofthe case, hence | am competent to swear this > adkidavit, That I have filed the accompanying petition under Section 13-B(2) of the H.M.A Act before this Hon'ble Court. The contents of the same are not being repeated herein for the sake of brevity and the same may be read as part and parcel of this affidavit. 3. That I got married with the petitioner No.2 according to Hindu ~Rites and ceremonies on 18.02.2012. Se That I have been living separately from the petitioner No.2 if. 5.06.2012 and we are not able to live together and have (Shot cohabited with each other since then. The marriage has broken down irretrievably.That mutual consent for divorce has not been obtained by Foree, fraud or undue influence by me or petitioner No.2. 6. That the petition has been drafted by my counsel under my instruction. The contents of the same are read over to me in vernacular language and | have signed the same in the token of its correctness. Jute DEPONENT 03 JAN 2023 Verified at ei on this 3" January-2023, that the contents of my atid ith Accompanying petition U/s 13-B(2) of H.M.A. are true ere frect to. my knowledge and belief and nothing has been concealed therefrom. ee Ter THE Depo:FAMILY COURT, DELHI IN THE DIS E “OURT OF LD. PRINCIPAL JUDG RICT SHAHDARA, KARKRDOOMA COURT! HMA PETITION ___ OF 2023 IN THE MATTER OF:- SmtJuhi «+» Petitioner No.1 AND Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya Petitioner No.2 AFFIDAVIT I, Sagar Singh Rajauriya (Age 33 years) S/o Sh. Om Dutt Rajauriya R/o Village Rami Mangla Majra, Rampur, Shahpur, PS- Chandos, District Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under: 1, That I am deponent herein and the petitioner No.2/husband in the above noted matter and am well conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case, hence I am competent to swear this affidavit. . That I have filed the accompanying petition under Section 13- x B(2) of the H.M.A Act before this Hon’ble Court. The contents of the same are not being repeated herein for the sake of brevity and the same may be read as part and parcel of this affidavit. 3. That I got married with the petitioner No.1 according to Hindu Rites and ceremonies on 18.02.2012. 4. That I have been living separately from the petitioner No.1 w.e-f. and we are not able to live together and have not LE col a cach other since then. The marriage has broken ‘ies consent for divorce has not been obtained by force, fraud or undue influence by me or petitioner No.1.6. That the petition has been drafted by my counsel under my instruction. The contents of the same are read over to me in vernacular language and | have signed the same in the token of ro CU) eae its correctness. VERIFICATION:- Q3 JAN Wis Verified at Delhi on this 3°° January -2023 that the contents of my (affidavit with accompanying petition U/s 13-B(2) of HM.A. are true andPaect to my Knowledge and belief and nothing has been ve J aicealed therefrom, on a a2) ~ i) IN THE COURT OF LD. PRINCIPAL JUDGE: FAMILY COURT, DISTRICT SHAHDARA, KARKRDOOMA COURTS, DELHI HMA PETITION _ OF 2023 IN THE MATTER OF:- SmtJuhi Petitioner No.1 AND Sh, Sagar Singh Rajauriya «Petitioner No.2 AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETTIONER NO.1/WIFE AS PER JUDGMENT DATED 15.05.2018PASSED BY THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI IN THE MATTER OF RAJAT GUPTA VS. RUPALI GUPTA IN CONT. CASE (C) 72/2013 1, Juhi (Age 32years) W/o Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya D/o Sh. Bhagwan Singh Rlo H. No.E-27/70, JJ Colony Part-I, Indra Camp, ChottaHasanpur,Delhi-1 10092, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under: 1. That I say that I am petitioner No. /wife in the above mentioned petition and am fully conversant with the facts of the petition, thus I am competent and in a position to swear this affidavit, 2. That I say that I got married with the petitioner No.2 on 18.02.2012 according to Hindu Rites and Ceremonies, and out of this wedlock, there is one child born to the parties namely Master Utkarsh. ‘That Ihaye been living separately from the petitioner No.2 W.E45.06.2016 and we are not able to live together and have not ~ Coligisted’ with each other since then, The marriage has broken etrievably. ~Ge That the parties to the petition have mutually agreed that their Marriage should be dissolved by mutual consent by a decree of divorce by this Hon’ble Court. 5. That with the intervention of the parents, well-wishers, friends etc., the petitioner No.1 and 2 have decided to resolve their all matrimonial issues and also they have arrived into a MOU/Settlement Deed dt.04.03.2022 on the following terms and conditions:- i It is agreed between the parties that both the parties shall dissolve their marriage by filing a petition w/s 13-B (1) & (2) of the HMA on the ground of mutual consent before the Hon'ble Family Courts, New Delhi. ii. It is further agreed between the parties that after expiry of mandatory prescribed period of six months or any other earlier if any so permitted under the law/Judicial Pronouncement they will file the second motion as contemplated under the HMA,1956, or in any other law and both the parties shall cooperate in entire process of mutual consent divorce proceedings and shall duly appear before the Hon'ble Court for recording of their respective statement as required in law for the first and the second motion. iii. It is agreed between the parties that the husband shall pay total sum of Rs.9,00,000/- (Rupees Nine lakh Only) to the /wife as full id final settlement against the maintenance towards past, oo -“present and future maintenance, permanent alimony, stridhan etc. under the following manner. The husband will pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000 /- (Rupees One Lakhvii. viii. Twenty Five. Thousand on) in the form of Demand Drafi/Cheque to the wife at the time of statement of the parties under first motion before the Hon'ble Family Courts within the stipulated time period. The husband will pay a sum of Rs. 2.00,000/-(Rupees two lakh only) in the form of Demand Drafi/Cheque tot the wife at the time of recording the statement of the parties in second motion of divorce petition. The husband will pay another sum of Rs.2,00,000 /- (Rupees Two lakh only) in the form of Demand Draft/Cheque to the wife at the time of quashing of the aforesaid FIR No.74/2017 from the Hon'ble High Court of Dethi. The husband will pay a sum of Rs. 1,50,000(Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) in the form of Demand Drafi/Cheque to the wife when she shall withdraw the cases U/S 125 Cr.P.C. from the concerned court on or before the next date of hearing after signing the present MOU. The husband will pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000(Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) in the form of Demand Drafi/cheque to the wife when she shall withdraw the cases U/S12 DV from the concerned court on or before the next date of hearing. It is agreed between the parties that except receiving the said amount, the wife will not have any right title, interest, claim etc. C whatsoever over the movable or immovable properties of and ‘a ajier granting the divorce subject to the compliance to ~ this aghBement. ; That itfurther agreed that both the parties shall withdraw all the “gases and complaints, filed against each other from thexi, Mii, xiii, xiv. hespeetive courtsauthorities in terms of the period as referved above and nothing case or complaint etc, shall remain pending i any authority or courts of law, if found or pending, the same shall be treated as null and void. Mis further agreed between the parties that these all proceedings shall be complete within 60 days positively. That it further agreed that the second party will move a petition for quashing the said FIR No.74/2017 before the Hon'ble High Court of Dethi and the first party will help and co-operate in the Said quashing petition and will give her required affidavit/NOC before the Hon'ble High Court of Dethi. It is agreed between the parties that the custody of afore-said child shall remain with the petitioner no.I/wife. The petitionerNo.2/nusband will not claim the custody of child in future from the wife and shall have no rights to file any guardian petition for the seeking the custody of children, It is agreed between the parties that in the event of default/breach of terms of mutually agreed settlement wife shall return the amount which she actually received along with the interest @2% per month to the husband. Similarly if the husband commits breach of terms of settlement the said amount shall stand forfeited by wife. It is agreed and undertake not to file any other complaint/Petition/ Execution Petition etc. against each other atwv. xvii. se 11 is agreed between the parties that in the event of failure of the compliance of the present settlement both the parties shall be at liberty to seek revival and pursue their respective cases/remedies under law which includes proceedings mention herein. That the parties have agreed on each and every terms as recorded in the settlement after carefully reading and understanding and appreciating the content, scope and thereof as also the consequences of breach thereof including the payment of fine, penalty as mentioned above. That I undertake to abide by the MOU/Settlement arrived at between me and petitioner No.2 as mentioned in the foregoing paras as mentioned above. That in case of any breach/violation/ willful/deliberate disobedience of the terms of the MOU/Settlement, I shall be liable to be punished for contempt of court. That I undertake to abide by the stipulation as contained in the judgment dated 15.05.2018 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the matter of Rajat Gupta Vs. Rupali Gupta in Cont. Case (C) 772/2013. That I say that the above petition is not presented in collusion with the petitioner No.2. I say that the mutual consent has not been obtained by force, fraud 6 ‘ndue influence. Sea ie] That Tsay that I have gone through the accompanying petition for dissolijion of marriage by a decree of dissolution of marriage byMutual consent and the contents of the same are correct and no Part oF it is false, 2. That I say that | undertake to abide by the terms and conditions as mentioned in the petition in its true letter and spirit 13. That I say that the contents of the accompanying petition may be read as part of this affidavit as those are not being repeated herein for the sake of brevity, Wie DEPONENT 9 JAN 2023 4 at Delhi on this 38° January-2023 that the contents of my aforesaid affidavit are true and correct. No part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom. bk DEPONENTr\ &) IN “ E COURT OF LD. PRINCIPAL JUDGE: FAMILY COURT, DISTRICT SHAHDARA, KARKRDOOMA COURTS, DELHI HMA PETITION OF 2023 IN THE MATTER OF:- Smt. Juhi ... Petitioner No. AND Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya Petitioner No.2 AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETTIONER NO.2/HUSBAND AS PER JUDGMENT DATED 15.05.2018 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI IN THE MATTER OF RAJAT GUPTA YS. RUPALI GUPTA IN CONT. CASE (C) 72/2013 1, Sagar Singh Rajauriya, S/o Sh. Om Dutt Rajauriye, R/o Village Rami Mangla Majra, Rampur, Shahpur, PS- Chandos, District Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under: 1. That I say that I am petitioner No.2/husband in the above mentioned petition and am fully conversant with the facts of the petition, thus I am competent and in a position to swear this affidavit. 2. That I say that I got married with the petitioner No.lon 18.2.2012 according to Hindu Rites and Ceremonies, at Delhi and out of this wedlock, there is one child born to the parties namely Bekarsh. . been living separately from the petitioner Sone and we are not able to live together and “pavé not cohabited with each other since then. The marriage has \._“bieken' down iretrievably.4. That the parties to the petition have mutually agreed that their marriage should be dissolved by mutual consent by a decree of divorce by this Hon'ble Court 5. That with the intervention of the parents, well-wishers, friends etc., the petitioner No.! and 2 have decided to resolve their all matrimonial issues and also they have arrived into a MOU/Settlement Deed dt.04.03.2022 on the following terms and conditions:- . It is agreed between the parties that both the parties shall dissolve their marriage by filing a petition u/s 13-B (1) & (2) of the HMA on the ground of mutual consent before the Hon'ble Family Courts, New Delhi. i. It is further agreed between the parties that after expiry of mandatory prescribed period of six months or any other earlier if any so permitted under the law/Judicial Pronouncement they will file the second motion as contemplated under the HMA,1956, or in any other law and both the parties shall cooperate in entire process of mutual consent divorce proceedings and shall duly appear before the Hon'ble Court for recording of their respective statement as required in law for the first and the second motion. 1 is agreed between the parties that the husband shall pay total sum of 9,00,000/- (Rupees Nine lakh Only) to the Awife as full and final fi. The husband will pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000 /- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Five Thousand only) in the form of Demand Drafi/Cheque tothe wife ar the time of statement of the parties under first motion before the Hon'ble Family Courts within the stipulated time period. v. The husband will pay a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/-(Rupees two lakh only) in the form of Demand Drafi/Cheque tot the wife at the time of recording the statement of the parties in second motion of divorce petition, vi. The husband will pay another sum of Rs.2,00,000 /- (Rupees Two lakh only) in the form of Demand Drafi/Cheque to the wife at the time of quashing of the aforesaid FIR No.74/2017 from the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. vii. The husband will pay a sum of Rs. 1,50,000(Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) in the form of Demand Drafi/Cheque to the wife when she shall withdraw the cases U/S 125 Cr.P.C. from the concerned court on or before the next date of hearing after signing the present MOU. viii. The husband will pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000(Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) in the form of Demand Draft/cheque to the wife when she shall withdraw the cases U/S12 DV from the concerned court on or before the next date of hearing. ix. It is agreed between the parties that except receiving the said amount, the wife will not have any right title, interest, claim etc. ee sgever"Over the movable or immovable properties of husband eases and complaints, filed against each other from the respective courts/authorities in terms of the period as referred above and nothing case or complaint etc. shall remain pending in any authorityor courts of law, if found or pending, the same shall be treated as null and void. vis In is further agreed between the parties that these all proceedings shall be complete within 60 days positively. wii. That it further agreed that the second party will move a petition for quashing the said FIR No.74/2017 before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and the first party will help and co-operate in the said quashing petition and will give her required affidavit/NOC before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi xiii. It is agreed between the parties that the custody of afore-said child shall remain with the petitioner no.I/wife. The ppetitionerNo.2/husband will not claim the custody of child in future {from the wife and shall have no rights to file any guardian petition ‘for the seeking the custody of chi xiv. It is agreed between the parties that in the event of default/breach iren. of terms of mutually agreed settlement wife shall return the amount which she actually received along with the interest @2% per month to the husband. Similarly if the husband commits breach of terms of settlement the said amount shall stand forfeited by wife. vw. It is agreed and undertake not to file any other complaint/Petition/ Execution Petition etc. against each other at any point of time in future in any court of law in India and both the parties hereby agreed to abide by the present settlement as having been reached without any undue influence, pressure or coercion, BDhecween the partes that inthe event of failure of the ‘Lrévival and pursue their respective cases/remedies iberby-t0" Se andr gssHCh includes proceedings mention hereinwii, That the parties have agreed on each and every terms as recorded in the settlement after carefully reading and understanding and appreciating the content, scope and thereof as also the consequencesof breach thereof including the payment of fine, penalty as mentioned above. That I undertake to abide by the MOU/Settlement arrived at between me and petitioner No.1 as mentioned in the foregoing parasas mentioned above. That in case of any breach/violation/ willful/deliberate disobedience of the terms of the MOU/Settlement, I shall be liable to be punished for contempt of court. That I undertake to abide by the stipulation as contained in the judgment dated 15.05.2018 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the matter of Rajat Gupta Vs. Rupali Gupta in Cont. Case (C) 77272013. That I say that the above petition is not presented in collusion with the petitioner No.1. 1a Lea that the mutual consent has not been obtained by force, pane: oli undue influence. hat’ say that I have gone through the accompanying petition for fissolution of marriage by a decree of dissolution of marriage by “mutual consent and the contents of the same are correct and no part of itis false.“apf Conying SMe Fay Coun, KK 4 Coutts, Delhi ‘MEMO OF PARTIES ‘ done vit _ HMA PETITION ORS. oF 2022 Petitioner No.1 Petitioner No.2 eerPe Ur 8 quret ?” Petitioner No.2 eed n PS Muha Vir | Sagar arurtiin PETITIONER NO.2 THROUGH: JaM Fado / ales Sy a]“Ss IIMA No.571/2022 Juhi vs. Sagar Singh Rajauriya @ Raj Kumar 02.11.2022 Present: Petitioner No.1 with Shri Shubham Bharti, Advocate. Petitioner no.2 with Shri Javed Khan, Advocate. Heard on the application under Order 1X Rule 9 read with section 151 CPC for restoration ofthe present petition. or the reasons mentioned in this application, the same is allowed. Present petition is restored to its original ‘number, Efforts for reconciliation made but did not Field any result. Vide the present petition, the petitionsrs want that their marriage be dissolved by decree of divorce by mutual consent. Both parties submit that they have been living separately since 05.06.2016 and there is no possibility of their living together. Joint statement of both the partis has teen recorded on today. | have perused the statement of the petitioners Vide my separate order, the first mation petition under section 13B(1) of ‘he Hindu Marriage Act is allowed, Parties shall remain bound by their respective statements, File be consigned to record room, Family Couns, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi 02.11.2022 ATTESTED 23 ONC we. exalyinbe Copying haenay. Family Cour, uit BethFits Motion MMA No. 5712022 Date 02.11.2022 Potition under Setion 13 B (1) of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Joint Statement of. Smt. Juhi Wio Shri Sagar Singh Rajauriya @ Raj Kumar Dio Shri Bhagwan Singh Rlo F-27/20, 1) Colony Par, Indira Camp. ‘Chotta Hasanpur, Dethi-1 10092 Petitioner No.1 - AND Shri Sagar Singh Rajguriya @ Ra) Kumar Sfo Shri Om Dutt Rajauriya Ro village Rami Mangla Majra, Rampur, Shahpur, PS ! Chandos, District Aligarh, Uitar Pradesh Pottoner No.2 ons. 11 We (petitioner No.1 and petitioner No2) got married Fj ont8.02.2012 according to Hind rites and ceremonies at Marriage Home, Chandos, Disirit Aligarh, Ustar Pradesh, Our 7 marriage photograph is EXP and mariage card is Ex.P-2. 4) ¥rom this wedlock, one mal chill namely Utkarsh was bor. ‘ ©, We (ptitioner No.1 and petitioner No2) have been living L separate since 05.06.2016 and have not been abl to ive together t sinee then. There is no possibilty of our living together as t fntnd rd it, on anf ewpeanen ies GA orbs tae em So) eee eee es 3. We (petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2) have amicably resolved all our disputes pertaining to this marriage including, stridhan, permanent alimony, dowry articles and maintenance AT EST 23 Oe a2 ExMmindy Copying Agency, Fhmily Court, KKD Couris, Delhi =i) u(Present, past & fiturs) « ‘le Memorandum of Understand™g, “ lated 04.08.2022 RAP-3 for a total sum of Rs.9.00,0000- (Rupees nine lacs only) in full and final settlement of claims of petit q # petitioner No.1 whieh shall be paid by petitioner No.2 | (petitioner No.1) have already received tom petitioner No.2 10 petitioner No. Rs.6,88,000) loday, 1 (petitioner No.1) have received Rs.12,000 i cash from petitioner No2. The ‘of Rs.2,00,000/-shall be paid. by lance settlement amount petitioner No.2 16 petitioner No. Tas per settlement Ex.P-3 at the lume of quashing of FIR No.74/2017 under seetions498A/806/34 re 4. We have agreed that we will file @ petition for quashing of FIR No.74/2017 under sections498A/406/34 IPC registered at police station Madhu Vihar before the Hon'ble Dethi High Court and we both will cooperate with each other. (On a court query, the ies have stated that they are aware that quashing of FIR is within the discretion of Hon'ble High Court). le Brat We have agreed that the present settlement is between us (petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2). We understand that this settlement agreement would not affect the rights of child Utkarsh Son Jor maintenance or the rights of the child which he may have in wt the properties of any person including us (petitioner) in any oe 6. As per settlement, custody of Utkarsh shall remain with petitioner No. /mother and petitioner No.2/father shall have no 7 visitation rights to meet the child. However, the child is free to meet his father 1 We (petitioner No.! and petitioner No.2) have also agreed that we will not initiate any ftigation or will not raise any claim in future against each her and the family members and relatives ATTEST? 23 Get ww Ekdmnor ‘Copying Agency, Family Cox IKKD Cours, bern oe =We ipetitioner Not wiilioner No 1 and pertoner No.2) have settied our Sisputes with our free will, volition and consent without any Soereion, pressure, influence, misrepresentation oF mistake We have executed the scttlement EX.P-3 af + fully understanding the lerms, consents, effcet and consequences thereof © We (petitioner Not and petitioner No.2). shall remain hound by the terms and conditions of settlement Ex 3 and the Siatement made today, We have made the present statement Voluntarily without any pressure, coercion oF Fores. : 8. We (petitioner Nol and petitioner No.2) state that the ‘consent 10 this petition has not becn obtained by fraud, pressure for undue influenee and we have given the consent to this petition {, voluntarily. ‘The present petition has not been fled by us in collusion with each other Vor identification, 1 (petitioner No.1) have placed on record the copy of my Aadhaar card which is ExP-4. 1 > (petitioner No.2) have placed on record the copy of my Aadhaar * card which is Ex.P- 5. We (petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2) have signed the petition for divorce afier going through the We (petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2) undertake 10 terms and conditions mentioned in the petition neution is FxP-7. My photograph (petitioner No.2) on the petivon is Ex.P-8, My affidavit (petitioner No.1) Ex.P-9 bears iny signatures at points and B, My affidavit (petitioner No.2) Ex.P-10 bears my signatures at points A and B. My affidavit (petitioner No.1) in compliance of judgement dated 15,08.2018 13} tiled of Hon'ble Delhi High Court [CONT CAS. (C) 772 TED 23 pi ae exMinel Copying Agency, Family Court, KKD Courts, Dethias Rajat Gupta vs. Rooy ‘i HN GUPIA vs Roopa Gupta EA.P-11 bears my signatures at ° Points A and 1 My affdat (petitioner No.2) in compliance of ludgement dated 18.05 > : twdkement dated 18082018 of Hon'ble Delhi High Court 7 "Pon JEONT OAS. (677979094 tied Rajat Gupta vs. Roopa Gua EVID Ha KATZ ears my vynatates at points A. and No erwecn us. We (petitioner Not and petitioner No.2) pray nat our petition may be accepted and allowed We foner No.| and petitioner No.2) have decided to take divorce hy mutual consent We pray that our marriage be dissolved by mutual consent 14 We (petitioner No.) and petitioner No.2) state that no part fof statement is false in any respect nor we have concealed any material fact. We understand the consequences of making false statement or concealing of material facts. ROKAC Petitioner No.1 identified by Ms. Shubham Bharti, Advocate (D- 349/2019) Mob. 9540160029 4 sagen Rayer syn Po Signature and thumb impression of petitioner No.2 (Mo. 991 7605282 ) 154770872017) Mod 8077283808 wf Gori. Roady as (BARITABIRBAL,) ae Principal Judge, Family Courts, Shahdara, - = Karkardoome Courts, Delhi © : ey 02.11.2022 Macsere: Ged ga Rw id STH BAS cama AT TT AE aay | ~ AM. lee hamvine} = ing Agancy, Fdmily Court, KD Courts, DelhiINTHE COURTOF MS, ARI PRIN! Trane TABIRBAL., PRINCIPAL ‘AMILY COURTS, SHATIDARA, KARKARDOOMA, COURTS, DELI MMA No.571/2022 Smt Juhi Wo Shri Sagar Singh Rajauriya @ Raj Kumar Dio Shri Bhagwan Singh Rio F-27720, 3) Colony Part Indira Camp. Chotia Hasanpur, Delhi-1 10092 Potitioner No.1 AND Shri Sagar Singh Rajauriya @ Raj Kumar Slo Shri Om Dutt Rajauriya Rio village Rami Mangla Majra, Rampur, Shahpur, PS Chandos, District Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh Petitioner No.2 PETITION UNDER SECTION 13B (1) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE, BY DECREE OF DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT. , ORDE! $1. This joint petition under section 138 (1) of finda | Mariage Ac, 1955 (hetcnafer refered as "the Act’) for dissolution of marriage by decree of divorce by mutual consent 3 bas been filed by the petitioners. “ Joint statement of the parties with respect to the present petition under Section 1381) ofthe Act has been recorded today ie, on 02.11.2022, The petitioners have proved the necessary documents relating to thei identification and affidavits. 3. The marriage between petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 was solemnised on 18.02.2012 according to Hindu rites and Hn No 5712002 page of 4 TESTED 24 Me a ehdmingr Copying Agency, Family Court, KikD Couris) Dei—— a Ceremonies o1 Marriage Home, Chandos, District Aligarh, Uitar Pradesh, Mariage photosraph 1x.P-1 and martiage eard Ex.P-2 have been placed on record as the proof of mariage, [tis stated son namely Uitkarsh was born, Petitioner No. and petitioner No.2 have stated that thors 10 possibility of thir livin togsther as husband and wife on AccoUNL OF temperamental difere that from this wedlock, one 4 mnees and they have been living, ate since 03.06.2016, Various efforts for reconciliation did Tot yield any result, Petitioners have further stated that there is Ro scope for any reconciliation and marriage between them has broken down invettievably 5. Petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 have Further stated that they have seitled their matrimonial disputes pertaining to this marriage including stridhan, permanent alimony, dowry articles ‘and maintenance (present, past & future) vide Memorandum of Understanding/settlement deed dated 04.03.2022 xP for a \ total sum of R.900,000- (Rupees mine lacs only) in fall and 2 nat satiemen oa claim of petitioner No.t which shall be <_Paid by petitioner No.2 to petitioner No.1. Petitioner No. statad 4 that she has already received Rs6.88,000/- from petitioner No. “TE ‘today, petitioner No.t has received Rs.12,000/- in cash from s.2,00,000/-shall be aid by petitioner No.2 to petitioner No.1 as per settlement [ExP-3 at the time of quashing of FIR 1No.74/2017 under setions 498,/406/34 PC 6. ‘The petitioners have agreed that they will ile a petition for guashing of IR No.74/2017 under setions498A/406/34 IPC registred at police station Madhu Vihar befor the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and they both will cooperate with each other pez 4 es Copying agerey. Faby Cou RKO Cours, OUROn a court query, the pa s are that " suerys the parties have stated that they are aware tl quashing, ; OF FIR is within the discretion of Hon'ble High Court. "he petitioners have agreed that the present settlement is ‘between them and they understand that this settlement agreement ‘would not affect the righis of son Utkarsh for maintenance or the Fights of the child which he may have in the properties of any person inelnding them in any manner 8 As per settlement, custody of son Utkarsh shall remain \with petitioner No.1/mother and petitioner No.2/father shall have no visitation rights to met the child, However, the child is free to rect his father 9, The petitioners have settled their disputes with their free will, volition and consent without any coercion, pressure, | influence, misrepresentation or mistake and they have executed 3 the setlement 15-3 afar filly understanding the terms, Y consents, effect and consequences thereof. 10. The petitioners have undertaken that they shall remain + bound by the terms and conditions mentioned in setlement & 1x3 and the statement made by them. Both the pettioners 7 ave stated that they have made the present statement voluntarily without any pressure, coercion or fore. 11, Petitioners have also agreed that they will not initiate any Ttigation and will not raise any claim in future against each other, their family members and their retatives. Both the petitioners sate that the consent to this petition has not been obtained by fraud, pressure or undue influence and they have given the consent 0 this petition voluntarily. The present petition has not teen filed by them in collusion with each other. In is stated that the parties have been living seperate since pest 4 es 23 MEE we Exgnabr Copying Aganey, Family Court, KKKD Cours, Deintea Pn Ona court query, the partie Wery, the parties have stated that they are aware that quashing : OF FIR is within the diseretion of Lon’ble High Court Uhe petitioners have agreed thatthe present seitlement is between them and they understand tha this settlement agreement ‘would not affeet the rights of son Utkarsh for maintenance oF the Fights of the child which he may have in the properties of any person including them in any manner. 8. As per settlement, custody of son Uskarsh shall remain ‘with petitioner No.l/mother and petitioner No.2/father shall have ‘ho visitation rights to meet the child. However, the child is free 10 meet his father 9. The petitioners have settled their disputes with their free will, volition and consent without any coercion, pressure, { influence, misrepresent or mistake and they have cexcouted 3 the settlement HP afer fully understanding the terms, \ consents, eilect and consequences thereof, - = 10, The petitioners have undertaken that they shall remain bound by the terms and conditions mentioned in settlement 4 TxP-3 and the statement made by them, Both the petitioners + ave stated that they have made the present statement voluntarily without any pressure, coercion or fore 11. Petitioners have also agzced that they will not initiate any Iitjgation and wil not raise any claim in future against each ther, their family members and their relatives. Both the petitioners state thatthe consent to this petition has not been obtained by fraud, pressure or undue influence and they have given the ceonsomt to this petition voluntarily. The present petition has not teen filed by them in collusion with each other 12, ttisst xj that the parties have been living separate since niga Nos 202 rageSot 4 - C ude Copying Agency, Family Court, KKD Courts, Delhi98.06.2016, The present petition has been filed with their fee consent AS such, there is no legal impediment to allow the prayer of the petitioners, 13. From perusal of the statement of the petitioners, it is seen that the petitioners have fled the present petition without any collusion, pressure, coercion, duress oF undue influence, 14. In view of above, the first motion petition under section 13.) of the Hindu Mariage Act, 1955 is allowed 15. File be consigned to record room aie Parr (sai oi AL PRINCIPAL. JUDGI VAMILY COURTS, SHATIDARA, KARRARDOOMA COURTS, DELI Announced on 02.11.2022 Office of the Prin Princip Family Court # Gertiies t db ts LIMA No 712022 pase of 4JET TEE [) “ae 7 ©.C. NO. He 4 seats & FIR NO. 5 ‘ Cc ue AD. 88.20). L___ = PS. ab Sereh Gun Mion IN THE COURT OF_{ D_ Pe inci a. bce Fairy Vcr (cup) ociy Fe ‘Suit / Appeal No, "—_________JurispicTion oF 202 in re:- Tuts: Plaintitis) —_Petitoner(s) Fppeitantis) O° Complainant(s) VERSUS 2 pls Foto i sSetendants)/ Respondents)/ Accused KNOW ALL to whom these Presopf shall come that |/ Wo pai wiO Sosa. reat Naja b Wear 6 “atl ¢ Fiboun ‘The above named _ Koodk noo, "TP acherwby sidan” > Ms. VIJAY RANI & ASSOCIATES LEGAL ADVISORS & CONSULTANTS Supreme Court of India & Delhi High Court VIJAY RANI ‘Advocate End. No. :b/14s872007 Chamber No. : G-711, G-Block, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi-110032 Mob, : 9990698323, 8130561556 Email : vijayatyagi71@gmail.com (herein after called the advocate/s) to our in the above - noted case i eaten) 10'be my/our Avoca Inte above - Noted caus mutorze ‘To ect, appear and plead in the above-noted case In this court or in any other courte || se may be tied or heard and si in the appelate court nel stoubjectto payment! | he > {or each court by me / us. o ees “ 4 ‘o sign fle, verity and present pleadings, appesis cross-obections of patitions {or executions review, revision, withdrawal, compromiee or other pettlone or effevite = oF other documents as may be deomed neceseary or proper forthe proeeculion of the ald case in ail te stages subjects to payment of fous tor each stage ‘Toe and take back documents to admit andlor deny the documents of opposite arty fo withdraw or compromise the sald case or su oF dleputes that may ariee touching or in any manner Race eens tans meee eae a ed Seer coon ms nate poses uray meme a canes oe eee eee cee een nee Be ea ae ee ae ee ae cat re Se es he Saget coy camel epea eoiat pms Soc a ag See ae ae ene eee ae Se ee Sa te barons rts ubetame rupees hr ee me are ote eset aa sesioe korea are teste Sos cr oto ar i a eet cat eo ae oe ese eee eee nc ES eden Ge ery core fa anal'we chateau home oomeavon a top ald eee enn Ce ase a ey tort ers ase ond coe ae ie eid coe a same, or te cabs teen thn oe ee ny oe rab aren tat ance th tet Pa te ne aida fes sa oe al gun Oy noe a ee a nnd nue propa te ear oa have been undarstand by evel / us on th. Pevnnday of nn dA ote. ae fete os core ct re oe wy | cou cnt ‘ara he Seles gon ft na Pan ma acvena nurse neces tacts done by the Advocate or hie Intents and purpose. ‘Advocateus ce.no fino 13... NBM 4). ps. Maden Leben © Aang ‘uuu aug 9 4 BL INTHE couRT oF__UY. PRimer Pal sypene Remy dowe[tS) O61 bes JURISDICTION OF 202 Sut Appeal nee ee Plaitis) 5, _Petionerts) = Sis < ————Rppellant(s) OF Complainants) VERSUS. Soret alm apeei Respondent(s) / Accused KNOW ALL to whom these Pre shall come that | / We joe! x Spo Dia Out Kojauiye. , Bi ep aise Cows tng May ‘The above named PSY SAP ON CST Bertani Adu, Se f. 8077253668 (herein after called the advocate/s) to be my / our Advocate in the above - noted case authorize plead In the above-ncted case inthis court or in any ether court In which the same {our Including High Court subject to paymen ates sbbarately mndlor deny the documents of opposite px = {cach and grant receipts hereot at te snd instruct any other Legal Practitioner authorising him to exercise the f y hereby conferred upon the Advocate whenever he may think fit to do ao and to sign the ” Fefund of the same In any ease be paid again by mous. resents the contents of which Tat have been understand by mel / us on this. at ‘Accepted subject to the terme of the four o Fagan. Pagaturd a Zoos owt ent sey Tae soni Impression OF Selow Mentioned Person ‘ne Hae Been Signed in My Presence, The Chantie Ju [35 FR/OOB: 120711990 sft FEMALE 7910 5879 2688 a Sree, ae seat t oe ‘Unigbeddareeaten Autor of no'8 Bp mare. pe aseen be sain De aa aia Cau baa AGH VIMAR, DEL. as! Os ‘evs 032 7910 5879 2688rene ets Sanu alate RMON oer aas ae 2533 9886 9976 a a ange SAT wrare, Vy Seay ~—sAnnexure-A CERTIFICA’ |. Adv. Vijay Rani Enrollment No, D/1459/2007 (copy attached) do hereby certify that I have personally verified the copies of the documents of the petitioners, enclosed with the petition with the originals and that the same are true copies of their respective originals. | also undertake to submit the duly signed and attested petition, in original in the court and to make up the deficiency, if any, in the court fee within the 15 days of L&E Vijay Rani BCD Enroll No D/1459/2007 Address-G-711, Karkardooma court Mob. No.9990698323 reopening of the courts uéAnnexure-B (to be filed by the petitioner(s) along with the petition of the Hindu Marriage Act filed through electronic mode Certi I, JuhiW/o Sh. Sagar Singh Rajauriya @Raj KumarD/o Sh. Bhagwan SinghRioE-27/70, Colony —Part-I,Indra_ Camp, ChhotaHasanpur,Delhi-110092, the petitioner No.1 do hereby certify that the documents annexed to the petition are true copies of their respective originals. The documents so annexed are self-attested and if the same are found to be false or fabricated, | shall make myself liable for civil and criminal legal action. I undertake to submit the duly signed and attested petition, in original in the court and to make up the deficiency, if any, in the court fee within the 15 days of reopening of the courts. WF Juhi Wio Sh, Sagar Singh Rajauriya @Raj Kumar Dio Sh. Bhagwan Singh Rio E-27/70, JJ Colony Part- 1, Indra Camp, Chhota Hasanpur, Delhi-110092 M.NO- 8447092576*», BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI (Statutory Body Under Advocates Act, 1961] oF Sen ean sno. STTINASS, vai upto 31/08/2020 VUAY RANI aovocate Enrolment No o7n4se/2007 Dama nat ee Seimei rib shiem toe en eugm:or __wesratmt noe) ‘apeve: No _estho) aot Birth: 15/01/1980 Residence 1020, Janta Fas {GtB Enc, Deh 110093, ph. 9960658823 ofc mm fo Aoeel veers Sorte cheated by nee