Professional Documents
Culture Documents
See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
International Journal of Consumer Studies ISSN 1470-6423
Didier Soopramanien
Department of Management Science, Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
Keywords Abstract
Experience, Internet shopping, risk
perception, scepticism. Researchers typically study how levels of risk perception about online shopping affect
whether and how consumers use the channel to buy products. In this paper, we propose to
Correspondence study how different types of attitudes towards online shopping are formed when consumers
Didier Soopramanien, Department of consider both the benefit and the risk of using the Internet to do their shopping. We consider
Management Science, Lancaster University the possibility that general types of attitudes are formed when consumers’ perception of the
Management School, Lancaster University, risk and the benefit of using online shopping conflict. We pay particular attention to the
Lancaster LA1 4YX, UK. concept of online shopping scepticism where consumers may fully realize the benefit of
E-mail: d.soopramanien@lancs.ac.uk using the Internet to do their shopping, but also express a certain level of concern about the
risk of using that channel. In the risk literature, researchers have shown that experience and
doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00945.x increased exposure to a particular technology usually involves the accumulation of more
and better knowledge that in turn may lead to a reduction in the perception of the risks
involved. In this research, we also explore the role of experience in the context of con-
sumers’ intention to use online shopping. More specifically, we postulate that online
shopping experience has a direct effect as well as an indirect effect on the intention to use
online shopping. Experience with online shopping directly increases the consumer’s inten-
tion to use the Internet to buy products but it also reduces the degree of scepticism and risk
aversion, and that in turn, also increases the intention to use online shopping.
the UK, Germany and the US. The Internet has the potential to
1. Introduction significantly impact on the way in which consumers go about the
Research by academics and in the related business press indicate activity of shopping (Weltevreden, 2007). For some consumers,
that an increasing number of consumers are using the Internet to the availability of online shopping as an alternative channel may
buy products particularly so in developed markets where both lead them to purchase less from physical stores and/or only use
Internet adoption and usage continues to rise (see Goode and them to gather product information and then buy online. For other
Harris, 2007; Soopramanien and Robertson, 2007; Hansen, 2008). groups of consumers, the Internet will not significantly affect how
Researchers have studied why some consumers use the Internet to they do their shopping. The extent to which different groups of
do their shopping, whilst others prefer to use in-store shopping consumers will use the Internet to buy products will have a sig-
and this literature is now quite established (Teo, 2006). Research nificant impact on the retailing and the business models of many
interest is now starting to focus on studying how consumers retailers.
intend to use online shopping. Typical research questions include, In the literature, there is a lot of attention that is devoted to
for example, whether consumers only browse online or both studying the risks of buying products on the Internet. Compared
browse and shop online and how the availability of online shop- with buying products in a store, consumers have to deal with
ping is affecting the number of shopping trips that consumers are different sorts of risks if they decide to use online shopping. For
making in stores (see Balasubramanian et al., 2005). Retail indus- example, when consumers are buying products online they cannot
try experts and business columnists are claiming that online shop- physically examine them or cannot test whether these products
ping is now ‘mainstream’ and often cite the rising proportion of actually work until they receive them. The interpersonal nature of
consumers who shop online as the main indicator of that trend. A the exchange process where consumers have to share personal
better indicator is to look at the proportion of shopping that con- information with people whom they will probably never meet or
sumers are doing online, as opposed to offline, and the extent to know very little about also increases the risk of buying products
which online shopping is replacing in-store shopping. Research online [Riegelsberger et al., (2005)]. Despite the fact that the
by Silicon.com cited on the Business Week website (posted on 18 existing literature refers to and studies the benefits of online shop-
July 2008) stated that 20% of shopping was being conducted ping, the discussion usually tends to concentrate on the risk or the
online in the UK. Weltevreden (2007) reports data that show that perceived risk as a barrier to consumer’s adoption and usage of
online shopping accounts for less than 5% of total retail sales in Internet shopping.
Perceived risks
of online shopping
Years of experience
with online shopping Figure 3 Conceptual framework of the
research.
less or equal to 14 999 294 41.70 The Internet has not changed the way I buy 86 12.20
Between 15 000 and 26 249 248 35.18 products
Between 26 250 and 37 499 103 14.61 The Internet has partly changed the way I buy 348 49.36
Equal to or greater than 37 500 60 8.51 products
Total Cases 705 100 The Internet has definitely changed the way I 271 38.44
buy products
Age
Total Cases 705 100
18 to 34 122 17.30
35 to 44 181 25.67
40 to 49 182 25.82
50 to 54 95 13.48 shopping is convenient, but also agree or strongly agree that shop-
55 and older 125 17.73 ping in this way is risky. From Table 4, we note that there are also
Total Cases 705 100 other groups of consumers who are unsure about how convenient
or risky online shopping is. That is, 332 (out of 705) consumers
Gender
neither agree nor disagree with the statements that relate to
Female 343 48.65 whether Internet shopping is risk and Internet shopping is conve-
Male 362 51.35 nient. We also note that, from this group, some consumers are
Total Cases 705 100 unsure about how risky online shopping is but do state that they
think it is convenient.
In the previous section, we have proposed some hypotheses
about the types of attitudes that can be derived from the relation-
Table 2 Online shopping experience
ship that exists between both the perceived risk and the perceived
Frequency % benefit of online shopping. To find out if such types of attitudes
can be extracted from the data and from the cross tabulations in
Less than a year 101 14.33
One year but less than 2 years 175 24.82
Table 4, we apply cluster analysis; in particular the k-means
2 years but less than 3 years 189 26.81 cluster analysis [see Iacobucci and Churchill, (2010) chapter 18].
More than 3 years 240 34.04 We are not going to provide a full theoretical discussion of this
Total Cases 705 100 technique here but we are going to describe how it has been
employed in our research. In employing cluster analysis, we aim to
classify consumers with similar attitudes in the same clusters (or
segments). We are going to use the two variables ‘Internet shop-
other interesting patterns that relate to forms of attitudes towards ping is very convenient’ and ‘Internet shopping is risky’ to classify
online shopping that have been described in section 3. Some the consumers in different segments. When applying k-means
consumers reveal that they either agree or strongly agree that cluster analysis one has to start by defining an initial number of
online shopping is convenient and they also strongly disagree or clusters (or segments). Meaningful clusters are arrived at based on
disagree that online shopping is risky (250 out of 705 cases). We the numbers of cases in each cluster and we should also be able to
can contrast this group with those consumers (114 out of 705 justify that the segments are different to each other. Based on the
cases) who are sceptical about online shopping in that they recog- two variables, for each cluster we need to identify a cluster centre
nize that online shopping is convenient, but also acknowledge that (typically the mean) such that cases that are close to that centre
it may be risky to use the channel to buy products. These are belong to that cluster. The process is recursive and interactive in
respondents who not only either agree or strongly agree that online the sense that cases will move from one cluster to another (based
Table 4 Cross tabulation of Internet shopping is convenient and Internet shopping is risky (percentages in brackets)
on how far or near they are to the cluster centre) until no better Table 5 Online shopping attitudinal segments
classification can be found. We start the process by specifying five
Cluster Representation
clusters as an initial step to find the number of clusters. One of the
Frequency % Centre in Figure 1
key rules of cluster analysis is that clusters should contain reason-
able number of cases so that useful analysis on the segments can Enthusiasts 309 43.83 C3 Q2
be carried out. One of the five clusters contained only five cases, so Mildly sceptical 237 33.62 C2 Q1
we consider four clusters. Sceptical 114 16.17 C4 Q1
The next stage, once the clusters have been identified, is to Non-enthusiasts 45 6.38 C1 Q4
provide some descriptions and ‘behavioural meaning’ to each of Total Cases 705 100
the different clusters. In cluster 1, we have consumers who, com-
pared with the other groups in other clusters, find Internet shop-
ping to be inconvenient and are also likely to perceive using the ception between consumers in these two clusters. Those in cluster
channel risky. This would match the description of the type of 3 are considered to have an enthusiastic type of attitude towards
attitude in Q4 in Fig. 1. Consumers in cluster 1 (quadrant 4 in online shopping in that they consider online shopping to be con-
Fig. 1) can be defined as displaying a non-enthusiastic attitude venient and not risky compared with other groups of consumers.
towards online shopping. Consumers in clusters 2 and 4 respec- These consumers would be in Q2 of Fig. 1. The results indicate
tively, rate online shopping as being convenient, but also that we do not have a group of consumers who are in Q3 of
acknowledge that it is risky to shop online. Both these groups of Fig. 1; those that find online shopping safe but inconvenient. This
consumers would be in the first quadrant of Fig. 1. However, is not unsurprising given that we are exclusively dealing with a
consumers in cluster 2 have lower perceptions of the risk of sample of online shoppers.
online shopping than those in cluster 4. For this reason, we We shall refer to these four clusters as attitudinal segments and
describe those consumers in cluster 4 as being sceptical about the number of consumers in each segment in shown in Table 5. In
online shopping, but those in cluster 2 are mildly sceptical that same table, we also provide the cluster centres for each of the
because of difference in their risk perception. One can argue here four segments and where they would be represented in Fig. 1. In
that we could merge clusters 2 and 4 respectively (hence have terms of the level of intention to use online shopping, there is an
three clusters instead of four), but we should note that it would be order regarding the type of attitude towards online shopping. That
inappropriate to do so based on the difference in their risk per- is, the ordering or reordering of the attitudinal segments in Table 5
Internet shopping is very convenient Between Groups 163.929 3 54.643 256.198 0.000
Within Groups 149.512 701 0.213
Total 313.441 704
Internet shopping is risky Between Groups 404.773 3 134.924 908.434 0.000
Within Groups 104.115 701 0.149
Total 508.888 704
Table 7 Clusters in each cluster associated with specific characteristics of consumers. Chang et al.
(2005) conducted a meta-analysis of the literature on online shop-
Cluster Centres (mean of each variable) for each cluster
ping and found that researchers have studied the impact of demo-
C1 C2 C3 C4 graphic variables on adoption levels of online shopping. This would
Internet shopping is risky 4.04 2.97 2.11 4.07 typically enable researchers to identify which demographic groups
Internet shopping is very 2.69 3.80 4.51 4.20 are more or less likely to use online shopping. In this research, we
convenient also wish to investigate if the demographic variables can explain if
and why different groups of consumer have different attitudes
Note: The scale for these variables varies from 1 (strongly disagree) to
towards online shopping. Other than studying the impact of the
5 (strongly agree).
demographic variables, we also intend to explore if online shopping
experience affects the way in which consumers form attitudes
towards online shopping. Chang et al. (2005) also find that
reflects how the different types of consumer attitudes towards researchers have also studied how attitude towards online shopping
online shopping may affect how different groups of consumers affect how consumers use the channel. It is important to highlight
intend to use online shopping. So, for example, those consumers here that the conceptualization of the different types of attitudes
who are mildly sceptical about online shopping are more likely to towards online shopping that is used in this research is different to
use and engage with online shopping than those who are sceptical what is commonly found in the literature.
as the latter group of consumers are more concerned about the To study the how these different variables affect attitude forma-
risks than the former group. However, these two groups are less tion towards online shopping we employ regression modelling.
likely to engage with online shopping than those who display an The dependent variable here is defined by the different attitudinal
enthusiastic attitude towards online shopping. segments in Table 5. The explanatory variables are the demo-
In order to provide some form of validation regarding the use of graphic variables (age, income and gender) and online shopping
these four segments, we conducted an analysis of variance experience. As we have explained above the dependent variable is
(ANOVA) for the two variables (risk and benefit). The results of ordinal and we therefore are effectively estimating an ordinal
the ANOVA are shown in Table 6. The results show that generally regression model. The regression modelling exercises are con-
the ratings of perceived risk and benefits, respectively, differ sig- ducted in SAS enterprise miner. The ordinal regression method
nificantly across the four segments. If we refer back to Table 7, we can be represented by the following equation:
observe the differences between the means of the segments. To
complement the ANOVA results in Table 6, we conduct the post ⎡ P (Y = j x1, x2, . . . x p ) ⎤
ln ⎢ ⎥ = a j + β1 x1 + β 2 x2 + + β j x j
hoc Tukey’s test to compare the means of the two variables ⎣ P (Y = 0 x1, x2, . . . x p ) ⎦
between any two segments. These post hoc tests are shown in for j = 1 . . . J
Table 8. The differences between the means of the variables are
shown in the fourth column of Table 8. The test results for the Y represents the dependent variable that defines the j attitudinal
variable ‘Internet shopping is convenient’ are significant between segments that are depicted in Table 5. xj represents the explana-
any two segments. The results for the variable ‘Internet shopping tory variables. The model depicted above is the log odds ratio and
is risky’ indicate that the test is insignificant only between non- for ordinal regression we have an identical effect of bj for unit
enthusiasts and those consumers whom we have described as change in predictor xj across all the cumulative probabilities. We
being sceptical about online shopping. This is not surprising given also have to note that all the explanatory variables in the model
the discussion in the previous paragraph on the definitions of the are categorical, which means that for each of them we have a
segments and if we look at the means of these two variables for the reference category. We apply the stepwise algorithm for the
two segments in Table 7. The results indicate that non-enthusiasts ordinal regression model such that only those factors that signifi-
are similar to those consumers who are sceptical about online cantly explain and discriminate between the different segments
shopping only in their risk perception, but these two groups of are included.
consumers are significantly different to each other in their percep- The results of the ordinal regression model for the attitudinal
tion of the benefit of using the channel. segments are shown in Table 9. We note from that table that the
Having identified the attitudinal types of behaviour, we next variables age and online shopping experience, respectively, sig-
study if we can explain if the different types of attitudes are nificantly explain how different groups of consumers will form
Segment (i) Segment (k) Mean Difference (j-k) Std. Error Sig.
Segment (i) Segment (k) Mean Difference (I-K) Std. Error Sig.
Table 9 Ordinal regression model for attitudinal segments (sample of results generally show that younger consumers are more likely to
705 cases) display an enthusiastic type of attitude towards online shopping
and are less likely to be either sceptical or non-enthusiastic about
Variables levels Estimate Std. Error Sig.
using the channel compared with older consumers. For example,
Threshold Non-enthusiasts -3.01 0.24 0.00 the parameter effect of being a consumer in the age range 18–34
Sceptical -1.52 0.21 0.00 increases the log odds ratio of displaying less sceptical attitude
Mildly sceptical 0.05 0.20 0.79 towards online shopping is 0.57 whilst for a consumer in the age
Age 18 to 34 0.57 0.24 0.02 range 50–54 the parameter effect is 0.20 and insignificant com-
35 to 44 0.71 0.22 0.00
pared with the reference category of consumers who are 55 and
40 to 49 0.06 0.21 0.78
older. We note that online shopping experience increases the
50 to 54 0.20 0.25 0.44
likelihood that consumers will display an enthusiastic type of
Online Less than a year -1.26 0.22 0.00
attitude towards online shopping. If we compare the parameter
shopping One year but less -0.80 0.19 0.00
effects for online shopping experience, we note, for example, that
experience than 2 years
2 years but less than -0.54 0.19 0.00
those who have one year or less than 1 year of online shopping
3 years experience are significantly more likely to have a non-enthusiastic
attitude towards online shopping compared to those who have 3 or
more years of online shopping experience.
One of the main hypotheses of the paper is that we postulate that
their attitudes towards online shopping. The overall prediction rate the different types of attitudes towards online shopping, the way in
of the model is 47.52 and the Chi-square test that compares the which these attitudes are formed, and the numbers of years of
likelihood ratios with and without the explanatory variables is online shopping experience will influence how consumers per-
significant (value of test 56.52, degrees of freedom 7). As is the ceive that the Internet has affected the way in which they buy
case with such types of models, we have to interpret the effects of products. In Table 3, we describe the responses of consumers
the variables with respect to a reference category which in this when asked how they felt that the Internet has changed the way in
case represents those consumers who display an enthusiastic type which they buy products. We employ regression modelling to find
of attitude towards online shopping. The coefficients for the out if consumers’ level of intention to use the Internet to buy
ordinal regression model are interpreted as the effect on the log products can be explained by their general attitudes towards online
odds for each category that defines the dependent variable. The shopping and online shopping experience. We also control for the
Table 10 Ordinal regression for intention to use online shopping Internet will change the way in which the buy products. The log
(sample of 705 cases) odds ratio effect for those with less than 1 year of online shopping
experience is almost twice the effect for those who have between
Variables Levels Estimate Std. Error Sig.
2–3 years of online shopping experience compared with the ref-
Threshold Not changed -3.23 0.35 0.00 erence category of those with 3 or more years of experience.
Partly changed -0.40 0.33 0.23 We summarize the findings by connecting the empirical findings
Age 18 to 34 0.68 0.26 0.01 described above to the main contentions of the research. The results
35 to 44 0.51 0.24 0.03 support the contention that it is important to recognize that con-
40 to 49 0.57 0.23 0.01
sumers form an attitude about online shopping by considering both
50 to 54 0.18 0.27 0.50
the risk and the benefit of online shopping, and that the relationship
Online Less than a year -1.20 0.25 0.00
between these two variables affects the intention to use the channel.
shopping One year but less than -1.00 0.20 0.00
We also need to highlight the effect of online shopping experience
experience 2 years
that both directly and indirectly affects how consumers intend to use
2 years but less than -0.67 0.20 0.00
3 years
online shopping. We find that the more experienced online shoppers
Attitude Non- enthusiasts -1.93 0.33 0.00 are more likely to use the channel than those have less experience.
Sceptical -0.82 0.22 0.00 Our results also indicate that online shopping experience also
Mildly sceptical -0.79 0.18 0.00 indirectly influences the intention to use online shopping through
Income Less or equal to 14 999 -0.59 0.29 0.05 its effect on consumer attitudes towards the channel. Those con-
Between 15 000 and 0.03 0.29 0.92 sumers with more years of experience with online shopping are
26 249 more likely to develop an enthusiastic attitude towards online
Between 26 250 and -0.12 0.33 0.70 shopping and are also less likely to form conflicting types of
37 499 attitudes towards the channel. This, in turn, increases the consum-
er’s intention to use the Internet to do their shopping.
We also have to note the effect of the demographic variable age.
From the two regression models, the results suggest that older
effect of the demographic characteristics as was the case in the consumers are unlikely to form favourable and non-conflicting
regression model above. We here also employ ordinal regression attitudes towards online shopping, and as a result, they perceive
modelling where the dependent variable defines each individual’s that the Internet is less likely to have an impact on their shopping
response about their intention to use online shopping. Ordinal behaviour compared with younger consumers. If we look at the
regression modelling is used here since the dependent variable is significance levels and the magnitude effects of the coefficients of
ordered depending on how each consumer feels that the Internet the variables from the two ordinal regression model, we note that,
has impacted on the way in which he/she buy products. The in general, the demographic factors tend to be less important than
explanatory variables for that model are (i) the demographic vari- those factors that relate to attitude and attitude formation towards
ables, (ii) attitudinal segments and (iii) online shopping experi- online shopping. Demographic factors are important in influenc-
ence. The stepwise algorithm is also applied for this second ing the adoption decision, whereas attitudes that specifically relate
ordinal regression model and the results are shown in Table 10. to the risks and the benefits of using online shopping may be more
The overall prediction rate of the model is 57.30 and the Chi- important in explaining usage behaviour.
square test that compares the likelihood ratios with and without the
explanatory variables is significant (value of test 134.89, degrees
of freedom 13). Except for gender, all the other candidate explana-
5. Research implications
tory variables are selected in model. The results indicate that older
and conclusions
consumers feel that the Internet is less likely to change how they As more consumers become Internet users, many of them can
buy products compared with younger consumers. For instance, the potentially become online shoppers. It becomes particularly impor-
log odds ratio effect for those in the age range of 18–34 is 0.68 and tant to understand how new Internet users perceive the risk of using
for those in the age range 50–54, the effect is 0.18 and insignifi- online shopping. The manner in which consumers use the Internet
cant. The results also indicate that consumers in higher income to buy products differs between different segments of the popula-
groups are more likely to engage with online shopping that those tion. The attitudes of different consumers towards online shopping
in lower income groups. will affect the way in which they will use physical stores and/or
We also note that the different types of attitudes that consumers online stores. Researchers have studied how perceived risk and
have towards online shopping has an impact on intention perceived benefit of using online shopping affect adoption and
to use the Internet to buy products. An enthusiastic type of usage of the Internet to buy products. However, this existing body of
attitude as opposed to being sceptical, mildly sceptical or non- work either tends to pay a lot of attention to the impact of perceived
enthusiastic increases the likelihood that consumers will engage risk or studies the roles of both perceived risk and benefit separately.
more with online shopping. It is worth highlighting the effect and In this paper, we have taken a different approach and have explored
the magnitude of the coefficients that represent the log odds ratio how general types of attitudes towards online shopping are formed
for non-enthusiasts (-1.93), sceptical (-0.82) and mildly sceptical about online shopping. Our main proposition in this paper is that
(-0.79) respectively, compared with the reference category of general types of attitudes towards online shopping are formed from
enthusiasts. The results also show that online shopping experience the relationship that exists between the perceived risk and the
is positively associated with how consumers perceive that the perceived benefit of Internet shopping. We also investigate the
possibility that attitudes that relate to both the risk and the benefit of Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, E. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behav-
using online shopping may conflict. ior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison and Wesley,
Our empirical results suggest that attitudes towards the risks and Reading, MA.
the benefits of using online shopping do conflict for some consum- Forsythe, S. & Shi, B. (2003) Consumer patronage and risk perceptions
in internet shopping. Journal of Business Research, 56, 867–875.
ers and that this has a negative impact on their intention to use the
Goode, M. & Harris, L. (2007) Online Behavioural Intentions. An
Internet to do their shopping. We are particularly interested in those empirical investigation of antecedents and moderators. European
consumers who are sceptical about online shopping in that they Journal of Marketing, 41, 512–536.
realize the benefits of online shopping but are concerned about the Hansen, T. (2008) Consumer Values, the theory of planned behaviour
risks involved. Those consumers who are sceptical or non- and online grocery shopping. International Journal of Consumer
enthusiastic about online shopping are less likely to perceive that Studies, 32, 128–137.
the Internet has affected and will affect their shopping behaviour Iacobucci, D. & Churchill, G.A. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis.
compared with those who are enthusiastic about using the channel. Marketing Research Methodological Foundations, 9th edn (ed. by
Online shopping experience plays an important role too and D. Iacobucci & G.A. Churchill), pp. 506–510. South Western, Mason,
influences how consumers perceive both the benefits and the risks OH.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of
of using online shopping. In particular, we find that online shopping
decision under risk. Econometrica, XLVII, 263–291.
experience lessens consumers’ scepticism about using the internet Ram, S. & Hyung-Shik, J. (1994) Innovativeness in product usage:
to buy products. We speculate here that, compared to late adopters a comparison of early adopters and early majority. Psychology and
of online shopping, experienced online shoppers have gained more Marketing, 11, 57–67.
knowledge about how to judge the benefits and risks of using the Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, A. & McCarthy, J.D. (2005) The mechanics of
Internet to shop online. We have to particularly highlight the trust: a framework for research and design. International Journal of
moderating role of that variable. Those consumers who are more Human-Computer Studies, 62, 381–422.
experienced are less likely to be sceptical about using online Rogers, E.M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. The Free Press,
shopping and are also more likely to embrace Internet shopping. NewYork.
As far as we are aware, there have not been other attempts in the Shih, H. (2003) An empirical study on predicting user acceptance of
e- shopping on the web. Information and Management, 41, 351–368.
literature that have specifically addressed the possibility of con-
Sjöberg, L. & Fromm, J. (2002) Information technology as seen by the
flicting attitudes towards online shopping compared with all the public. Risk Analysis, 21, 427–442.
attention that has been given to studying the effect of perceived Soopramanien, D. & Robertson, A. (2007) Adoption and usage of online
risk and there is obviously scope for further research on attitude shopping; an empirical analysis of buyers, browsers and non-internet
formation and how the latter affects how consumers intend to use shoppers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14, 73–82.
the Internet. An avenue for further research is to pay more atten- Teo, T. (2006) To buy or not to buy online: adopters and non-adopters
tion to the nature of online shopping experience or the knowledge of online shopping in Singapore. Behaviour and Information Technol-
that experienced shoppers have gathered that makes them less ogy, 25, 497–509.
sceptical about online shopping, compared with those who are Weltevreden, J.W.J. (2007) Substitution or complementarity? How the
relatively new at using the channel. Another related research ques- Internet changes city centre shopping. Journal of Retailing and Con-
sumer Services, 14, 192–207.
tion that is worth exploring further is to study if the specific
shopping activities online differ between the different groups of
consumers. For example, do sceptical consumers buy different Appendix
types of products online compared to enthusiastic consumers?
There is, of course, also the need to better understand what exactly Survey questions on online shopping usage
causes scepticism amongst consumers when it comes to using the and behaviour (excluding questions on
Internet to buy products. demographics)
• Please tell us how you feel about the convenience aspects of
References online shopping by rating the following statements (1 = strongly
Alhakami, A.S. & Slovic, P. (1994) A psychological study of the inverse
disagree to 5 = strongly agree)
relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analy- Internet shopping is very convenient
sis, 14, 1085–1096. Internet shopping is risky
Balasubramanian, S., Raghunathan, R. & Mahajan, V. (2005) Consumers • When did you first start to shop online?
in a multichannel environment: product utility, process utility and Less than 3 months
channel choice. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19, 12–30. 3 to 6 months
Barnett, J. & Breakwell, G.M. (2001) Risk perception and experience: 6 to 12 months
hazard personality profiles and individual differences. Risk Analysis, 1 to 2 years
1, 171–177. 2 to 3 years
Bauer, R.A. (1960) Consumer behavior as risk taking. In Dynamic Mar-
More than 3 years
keting for a Changing World, Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of
the American Marketing Association (ed. by R.S. Hancock), pp. 389–
• In your opinion which of the following statements best describe
398. Chicago IL. the way in which you buy products and the Internet
Chang, M., Cheung, W. & Lai, V.S. (2005) Literature derived reference The Internet has not changed the way I buy products
models for the adoption of online shopping. Information and Manage- The internet has partly changed the way I buy products
ment, 42, 543–559. The Internet has definitely changed the way I buy products