Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE 1(1) GURGAON
To,
BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
4/118 SECTOR 4, SECTOR 4
GURUGRAM 122001,Haryana
*ITBA100019017996*
India
ASSESSMENT ORDER
2. Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny under CASS. Statutory
notice u/s 143(2) was issued on 07.09.2018 through ITBA which was duly served
upon the assessee. Further, notice u/s 142(1) were issued through ITBA from time to
time during the assessment proceedings and were duly served on assessee. In
response to the said notices, assessee filed submission through e-proceedings from
time to time and furnished the details which are scrutinized on test check basis
Requisite information furnished by the assessee have been examined and placed on
the record. Assessment in this case is finalized on the following observation.
Note: If digitally signed, the date of digital signature may be taken as date of document.
,HSIIDC BUILDING, VANIJYA NIKUNJ, UDHYOG VIHAR, PHASE-V, GURGAON, Haryana, 122001
Email: gurgaon.dcit1.1@incometax.gov.in, Office Phone:01244040931
* The Notice/Letter/Order No. mentioned above may be treated as DIN for the purpose of procedure for issuance of Income Tax Notice
prescribed by Circular No.19/2019 dt. 14 August 2019.
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
On perusal of the balance sheet of the assessee, it is observed that the assessee
has shown an investment to the tune of Rs 19,00,000/- in its balance sheet in the
name of Tirupati Containers Pvt Ltd which is capable of yielding exempt income. On
further examination and verification of financials of the assessee, it is found that the
assessee has not made any disallowance u/s 14A read with rule 8D. Therefore the
assessee was show-caused as vide Notice dated 02.08.2019 as to why no
disallowance u/s 14A not be made in respect of investment in Tirupati Containers Pvt
Ltd. In response to this, the assessee filed its reply dated 14.08.2019 wherein it has
stated that the investment of Rs 19 lacs in shares of M/s Tirupati Containers
Pvt ltd has not been made by the company in the F.Y. 2016-17. Instead, this
investment pertains to the financial year 2015-16. Moreover, neither any
expenditure has been incurred nor any exempted income earned thereon
during the financial year 2016-17 and therefore making any disallowance on
this account does not arise.
I have considered the submission of the assessee but did not find it acceptable
because:
14A. For the purposes of computing the total income under this chapter,
deduction shall be allowed in respect of expenditure incurred by the assessee
in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this
Act.”
(iii) Circular no. 5 of 2014 dated 11.02.2014 further clarified that the expenses
which are relatable to earning of exempt income have to be considered for
disallowance, irrespective of the fact whether any such income has been earned
during the financial year or not. The para. 6 of the Circular reads as follows:
“.... Thus, in light of above, Central Board of Direct Taxes, in exercise of its
powers under section 119 of the Act hereby clarifies that Rule 8D read with
Section 14A of the Act provides for disallowance of the expenditure even
where taxpayer in a particular year has not earned any exempt Income...”
Therefore, assessees claim that assessee has not earned any exempt income during
Page 2 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
(iv) Further, as per the provisions of I. T. Act, 1961 the disallowance should be
computed as per provisions of Rule 8D of the I. T. Act, 1962 but nowhere in the
prescribed rule it is mentioned that strategic investment is not to be included while
computing the disallowance. The investment which can yield exempt income that is
required to be taken in consideration while computing the disallowance. It is difficult
to accept that assessee can earn exempt income without incurring any expenses
whatsoever including management or administrative expenses as investment
decisions are generally taken in a planned manner. The term” expenditure” occurring
in Section 14A would take in its sweep not only direct expenditure but also all forms
of expenditure regardless of whether they are fixed, variable, direct, indirect
,administrative ,managerial or financial. On this issue, after comprehensive
consideration of all the relevant aspects including the provisions of law, the Chennai
Bench of ITAT in Southern Petro Chemicals Industries (3 SOT 157)had held that
proportionate management expenses are required to be deducted while computing
the exempt income by way of dividend. In the case of ACIT-Range 10(1)vs. Citicorp
Finance (India) Ltd.(108 ITD 457), the Hon’ble ITAT, Mumbai C Bench, had held that
all expenses connected with the exempt income have to be disallowed under section
14A regardless of whether they are direct or indirect, fixed or variable & managerial
or financial in accordance with law”.
(v) As regards the applicability of Rule 8D of the I.T. Rules, the Hon’ble ITAT in
the case of Citicorp Finance(I)Ld. (supra)held that “.. it is no longer open to the
Assessing Officer to apply his discretion in computing the disallowance or make ad
hoc disallowance u/s.14A….”as”…. sub-sections (2) & (3)Seek to achieve the
underlying objection of section 14A(I) that any expenditure incurred in relation to
exempt income should not be allowed deduction…”. While concluding the Hon’ble
ITAT held that “….. the provisions for quantification of disallowance as contained in
sub-sections(2) & (3) of section 14A are procedural & therefore, apply to all pending
matters…” and that “… the aforesaid provisions have retrospective operation &
therefore, would apply to all pending matters…”.In this context, it may be stated here
that a special Bench of ITAT, Mumbai constituted in the case of ITO vs. Daga capital
Management Private Limited, vide its order dated 20.10.2008 in ITA No.
8056/Mum/03, has also affirmed the decision of the Divisional Bench in the case of
Citicorp Finance (I) Ltd (supra)about the application of section 14A & the Sub-
sections therein inserted w.e.f. 01.04.2007.
(vi) Reliance is also placed on the recent decision of Apex Court in the case of
M/s Maxopp Investment Ltd Vs. CIT (Civil Appeal No. 104-109 of 2015) 91
taxmann.com 154(SC) wherein it was held that the argument that S. 14A & Rule 8D
Page 3 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
will not apply if the “dominant intention” of the assessee was not to earn dividends
but to gain control of the company or to hold as stock-in-trade is not acceptable.
The insertion of section 14A with retrospective effect, ie from 01.04.1962, is a serious
attempt on the part of the Legislature not to allow deduction in respect of any
expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to income, which does not form part
of the total income under the Act, against the taxable income. The Legislature has
further clarified its intention that the expenses incurred can be allowed only to the
extent they are relatable to the earning of the taxable income. The legislature has,
therefore, made an attempt to curb the practice used to reduce the tax payable on
the no exempt income by debiting the expenses incurred to earn the exempt income
against the taxable income. The language used by the legislature in the statute made
it amply clear that Legislature was well aware that the deduction of expenses in
respect of exempt income were being claimed in full, against the taxable income. It
was, therefore, clarified that expenses incurred can be allowed only to the extent they
are relatable to earning of the taxable income. Nature of the expenses incurred may,
therefore, be related partly to the exempt income, & partly to the taxable income, but
the intention of the Legislature is to allow the expenses only to the extent they are
relatable to the earning of taxable income. It has been clarified unambiguously that in
computing the total income, no deduction shall be allowed in respect of expenditure
incurred by the assessee against the income which is claimed as exempt from tax.
Circular 14 of 2001, dated 22.11.2001, & circular No 8 of 2002, dated 27.8.2002 have
also explained the provisions wherein it has been clarified that no expenses relatable
to an income exempt from tax would be allowed as a deduction.
Keeping in view the facts of the case & in view of the provisions of sec 14A r.w.r. 8D,
I am not satisfied with the genuineness of the claim made by the assessee with
regard to the expenses related to earning of the exempt income. As the
accounts prepared by the assessee does not give true picture about the correctness
of expenditure with regard to the exempt income, provision of section 14A is required
to be invoked to work out the disallowance u/s 14A as per rule 8D of the I.T. Rules
1962. The assessee was required to explain why disallowance of expenditure should
not be make u/s.14A of the I.T. Act in accordance with the computation prescribed
under Rule 8D of the I.T. Rules, 1961.
In view of the above discussion it is clear that disallowance u/s 14A is warranted in
this case. On going through computation of the assessee it is noticed that the
assessee has not computed the disallowance as per Rule 8D(iii), therefore, I hereby
compute the disallowance u/s 14A r.w.s. 8D which is as follows:
Page 4 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
Accordingly, Rs. 19,000/- is disallowed and added back to the total income of the
Page 5 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
I am satisfied that the assessee has under reported his income by misrepresenting
the facts by not making disallowance u/s 14A to the extent of Rs.19,000/.
Accordingly, penalty proceedings u/s 270A(1) r.w.s270A(9)(a) is initiated separately
for under reporting the income and misrepresentation of facts.
During the course of assessment proceedings, it was seen that amount of PF deposited
(employee contribution) as per Col. 20 (b) of Tax Audit Report in Form 3CD after the due
date under the relevant Act was Rs.1,24,697/-, However, no disallowance has been made in
the computation of income by the assessee in this regard. Vide show-cause Notice dated
02.08.2019, the assessee was show caused as to why disallowance for not paying PF
payment in time be made. In response, the assessee filed reply dtd. 14.08.2019 as under :
“It is true that some of the statutory dues like ESIC & PF have been paid after the due date
of payment as indicated in your notice dated 02.08.2019. However, SLP against the
judgment of Rajasthan High Court in a case CIT Vs Rajasthan Steel Beverage Corporation
Ltd.(2017) 84 taxmann.com 173(raj) has been rejected by SC(250 Taxmann 16) wherein
payment of such dues made after the due date but before due date of submission of income
tax return has been allowed. In view of above no disallowance be made on this account.”
The above reply of the asssessee has been perused but was not found tenable for the
reason discussed here under:
As per Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 “Any sum received by the assessee
from any of his employees to which the provisions of sub-clause (x) of clause (24) of
Section 2 apply, if such sum is credited by the assessee to the employee’s account in the
relevant fund or funds on or before the due date.
Explanation- For the purpose of this clause, “due date" means the date by which the
assessee is required as an employer to credit an employee's contribution to the
employee’s account in the relevant fund under any Act, rule, order or notification issued
there under or under any standing order, award, contract of service or otherwise;]
Page 6 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs Merchem Limited
dated 08-09-2015 gave its decision in favor of the revenue and held that “The assessee
was not entitled to get deduction of the contributions received from the employees if paid
on or before the filing of the return u/s 139(1). The assessee was entitles to get the
deduction on the amounts as provided u/s 36(1)(va) only if the amounts so received from
the employees were paid within the due date as provided under the relevant statute.”
“As per Section 43B of the Act certain deductions are admissible only on payment basis.
It is observed by the Board that some field officers disallow employer’s contributions to
provident fund or superannuation fund or gratuity fund or any other fund for the welfare of
employees, by invoking the provisions of Section 43B of the Act, if it has been paid after
the ‘due dates’, as per the relevant Acts.
2. The matter has been examined in light of the judicial decisions on this issue. In the
case of Commissioner vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd. [2009] 185 TAXMAN 416 (SC), the Apex
Court held that the amendments made in Section 43B of the Act i.e. deletion of second
proviso and amendment in the first proviso, being curative in nature are retrospectively
applicable from 1-4-1988. It further held that by deleting the second proviso to Section
43B of the Act and amending the first proviso, the contribution to welfare funds have been
brought at par with the other duty, cess, fee etc. Thus, the proviso is equally applicable to
the welfare funds also. Therefore, the deduction is allowable to the employer assessee if
he deposits the contribution to welfare funds on or before the due date of filing of return of
income.
3. Accordingly, w.e.f. 1.4.1988, the settled position is that if the assessee deposits any
sum payable by it by way of tax, duty, cess or fee by whatever name called under any law
Page 7 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
for the time being in force, or any sum payable by the assessee as an employer by way of
contribution to any provident fund or superannuation fund gratuity fund or any other fund
for the welfare of employees, on or before the ‘due date ’ applicable in his case for
furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act, no disallowance can be
made under section 43B of the Act.
4. In the light of the Supreme Court’s decision in the matter, the issue is well settled.
Accordingly, the Board has decided that no appeal may henceforth be filed on this ground
by the officers of the Department and appeals already filed, if any, on this ground before
Courts/ Tribunals may be withdraw upon. This may be brought to the notice of all
concerned.
5. It is clarified that this circular does not apply to claim of deduction relating to
employee’s contribution to welfare funds which are governed by Section 36(1)(va) of the
IT Act.”
On the basis of above mentioned judgments, CBDT Circular and facts of the case of the
assessee, the delay in deposit of PF amounting to Rs.1,24,697/- after the due date of the
relevant Act is being disallowed and added back to the income of the assessee u/s
36(l)(va).
I am satisfied that the assessee has under reported his income by misrepresenting
the facts by not making disallowance u/s 36 to the extent of Rs.1,24,697/.
Accordingly, penalty proceedings u/s 270A(1) r.w.s270A(9)(a) is initiated separately
for under reporting the income and misrepresentation of facts.
6. Addition u/s 68
During the course of assessment proceedings, it was seen that the assessee company has
taken unsecured loan of Rs 3.5 crores from CCL International Pvt Ltd. A search operation
was conducted by the Investigation Wing Kolkata and Kolkata wing unearthed the racket of
generation of bogus capital gain/loss and as per report provided by Investigation Wingh,
Kolkata, CCL International Pvt Ltd (Scrip code 531900 and Scrip Name : CCLINTER) has
been identified as on of such companies. Therefore, a show-caused as to why Rs 3.5 crorre
may not be added to your income from unexplained sources u/s 68 of the Income Tax
Act,1961. In response to the ibid notice, the assessee company field its reply dated
Page 8 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
“M/s CCL International Ltd. Is engaged in construction of road activities in India and
was awarded Govt. Contract of more than 50 cr in the state of Meghalaya and
completed work of more than 27 crore during the financial year 2016-17 as per audited
balance sheet.
M/s CCL International Ltd transfer Rs 3,50,00,000/- to their current account with HDFC
Raj Nagar to make a temporary loan of Rs 3.5 crore on 11.04.2016 to our company
through bank transfer.
Out company have repaid the temporary loan to M/s CCL International on 20th April
2016 of Rs 1.75 crore and on 22.04.2016 on 22.04.2016 Rs 1.75 crore thorugh banking
channel and a/c was squared up.
The above reply of the assessee has been considered and found not tenable due to
following reasons :-
CCL International Limited is a company registered with ROC Delhi. This company was incorporated
on 04.06.1991. M/s CCL International Ltd Corporate Identification Number is (CIN)
L26940DL1991PLC044520. The company claims to be in the business of Comm. Trading &
Distribution. The shares of the company are traded on Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) under the
Page 9 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
SHAREHOLDER'S FUNDS
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Page 10 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
ASSETS
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Long Term Loans And Advances 3.81 5.57 10.87 14.82 7.41
CURRENT ASSETS
Short Term Loans And Advances 6.21 7.60 7.07 10.14 17.91
Page 11 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
Other Earnings - - - - -
BONUS DETAILS
NON-CURRENT INVESTMENTS
Page 12 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
Non-Current Investments Unquoted Book Value 1.23 1.47 1.47 0.87 0.03
CURRENT INVESTMENTS
Profit/Loss After Tax And Before ExtraOrdinary 0.85 1.03 0.99 1.75 0.92
Items
Page 13 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
From To (Rs. cr) (Rs. cr) Shares (nos) Face Value Capital
Page 14 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
Competition
Name Last Price Market Cap. Sales Net Profit Total Assets
(Rs. cr.) Turnover
Page 15 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
From the above financials it is seen that the financial worth of the company is not significant.
The information available with the department was collated and it is found that the following entities
which have purchased the shares of CCL International Limited are bogus/paper entities:
Sl. No. PAN Party Name Entry Operator QTY TRADE VALUE
3 AANCS7459M STREA, COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD. Bal Kishan Sikaria 7,18,895 17,98,26,978
Page 16 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
13 AAECA1364L ANKUR COMMOSALE PVT. LTD. Shiv Kumar Khemka 5,24,970 7,69,73,149
18 AAFCM8007K MIHIR ADVISORY SERVICES PRIVATE Shiv Shankar Banka 4,04,359 4,81,74,587
LTD.
Page 17 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
Page 18 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
43 AADCV2143D VSG LEASING AND FINANCE COMPANY Shiv Shankar Banka 71,750 1,32,73,918
LTD.
Page 19 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
73 AADCK5292N KESARI NANDAN TIE UP PVT. LTD. Rajendra Bubna 10,500 12,51,000
74 AAACH2324P HILL QUEEN INVESTMENT (P) LTD. Rakesh Agarwal 9,500 12,49,250
Page 20 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
AGARWAL
The financials of CCL International Limited are very poor and the business profile
shows that the company was not engaged into any substantial activity. The business profile shows
that the company was not having any future plans which could attract investors from all over India to
invest in the company. Various Exit Providers have confirmed that they have purchased the shares of
CCL International Limited to provide entry of bogus LTCG/STCG/loss.
Page 21 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
[Addition/s 68 of Rs.3,50,00,000-]
I am satisfied that the assessee has under reported his income by misrepresenting
the facts on account of unsecured loans to the extent of Rs.3,50,00,000/-.
Accordingly, penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC is initiated separately for undisclosed
income.
Page 22 of 23
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1019649701(1)
8. Assessed. Charge interest u/s 234A, 234B & 234C of the IT Act. Issue
requisite documents. Calculation of tax is enclosed. Give credit of prepaid taxes after
due verification. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A(1) r.w.s 270A(9)(a) and u/s 271AAC
of the Act, are being initiated separately.
SEEMA DHANKHAR
CIRCLE 1(1) GURGAON
Copy to:
Assessee
SEEMA DHANKHAR
CIRCLE 1(1) GURGAON
Page 23 of 23
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE 1(1) GURGAON
Computation Sheet
General Details
PAN AAECB8489P Assessment 2017-18
*ITBA100019018008*
Year
Name BIHARI JI Address 4/118 SECTOR 4 ,SECTOR
CONTAINERS 4 GURUGRAM 122001
PRIVATE LIMITED ,Haryana
India
Residential Resident Document ITBA/AST/S/116/2019-
Status Number 20/1019649713(1)
Order 143(3) Order Date 01/10/2019
Section
SI.
Reporting Heads Amount as per Current Order (in Rs.)
No.
HEADS OF INCOME
1. INCOME FROM HOUSE PROPERTY 0
INCOME FROM BUSINESS OR
2. PROFESSION 85,30,393
3. INCOME FROM CAPITAL GAINS 0
4. INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES 3,50,00,000
5. INTRA HEAD ADJUSTMENTS 0
TOTAL(AFTER INTRA HEAD
6. 4,35,30,393
ADJUSTMENT) 6=(1+2+3+4)-5
LOSSES OF CURRENT YEAR SETOFF
7. 0
AGAINST 6
BROUGHT FORWARD LOSSESS SET
8. OFF AGAINST 0
8=(6-7)
GROSS TOTAL INCOME (INCLUDING
9. SPECIAL INCOME) 4,35,30,393
9=6-(7+8)
INCOME CHARGEABLE TO TAX AT
10. 3,50,00,000
SPECIAL RATE
11. DEDUCTION U/S 10A or 10AA 0
Note: If digitally signed, the date of digital signature may be taken as date of document.
,HSIIDC BUILDING, VANIJYA NIKUNJ, UDHYOG VIHAR, PHASE-V, GURGAON, Haryana, 122001
Email: gurgaon.dcit1.1@incometax.gov.in, Office Phone:01244040931
* The Notice/Letter/Order No. mentioned above may be treated as DIN for the purpose of procedure for issuance of Income Tax Notice
prescribed by Circular No.19/2019 dt. 14 August 2019.
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/116/2019-20/1019649713(1)
Page 2 of 4
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/116/2019-20/1019649713(1)
41=(37+38+39+40)
AGGREGATE INCOMETAX LIABILITY
42. 3,89,49,691
42=(36+41)
PRE-PAID TAXES
43. TDS 48,485
44. TCS 29,658
45. ADVANCE TAX 5,00,000
46. SELF ASSESSMENT TAX 26,92,132
47. REGULAR TAX PAID 0
TOTAL TAXES PAID
48. 32,70,275
48=(43+44+45+46+47)
TAX PAYABLE/REFUND
AMOUNT PAYABLE /REFUND AMOUNT
49. 3,56,79,416
49=(42-48)
INTEREST U/S 244A ON CURRENT
50. 0
AMOUNT
TOTAL AMOUNT PAYABLE/ REFUND
51. AMOUNT 3,56,79,416
51= (49+50)
REFUND ALREADY ISSUED (incl. interest
52. 0
u/s 244A)
BALANCE AMOUNT
PAYABLE/REFUNDABLE
53. (incl. provisional Interest u/s 244A till 3,56,79,416
current order - if any)
53 = (51-52)
54. INTEREST U/S 220(2) CHARGED (In Rs.) 0
AMOUNT PAYABLE/REFUNDABLE
55. 3,56,79,416
55=(53+54)
DEMAND IDENTIFICATION NO AGAINST
56. 2019201737050437772C
ORIGINAL DEMAND
Page 3 of 4
AAECB8489P- BIHARI JI CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED
A.Y. 2017-18
ITBA/AST/S/116/2019-20/1019649713(1)
EDUCATION CESS
TOTAL TAX ON DISTRIBUTED INCOME
4. 0
ON BUY BACK OF SHARES PAYABLE
5. INTEREST U/S 115QB 0
ADDITIONAL INCOME TAX AND
6. INTEREST PAYABLE 0
6=(4+5)
7. TAX AND INTEREST PAID 0
NET TAX PAYABLE
8. 0
8=(6-7)
*In case of refund, Refund Intimation cum Adjustment sheet will be issued subsequently and
separate communication will be sent for that.
SEEMA DHANKHAR
CIRCLE 1(1) GURGAON
Page 4 of 4