The second defense witness was cross-examined by the prosecution about why they did not report a threat, to which they said no. In video evidence shown to the court, it showed the accused talking to other accused people. The judge asked when the parties wanted to set a final judgment, and the prosecution if they were amenable to the schedule. The hearing was then adjourned. At the promulgation of judgment, the attorneys received the final verdict. At an arraignment, the prosecution asked if the defense was amenable to the trial schedule.
The second defense witness was cross-examined by the prosecution about why they did not report a threat, to which they said no. In video evidence shown to the court, it showed the accused talking to other accused people. The judge asked when the parties wanted to set a final judgment, and the prosecution if they were amenable to the schedule. The hearing was then adjourned. At the promulgation of judgment, the attorneys received the final verdict. At an arraignment, the prosecution asked if the defense was amenable to the trial schedule.
The second defense witness was cross-examined by the prosecution about why they did not report a threat, to which they said no. In video evidence shown to the court, it showed the accused talking to other accused people. The judge asked when the parties wanted to set a final judgment, and the prosecution if they were amenable to the schedule. The hearing was then adjourned. At the promulgation of judgment, the attorneys received the final verdict. At an arraignment, the prosecution asked if the defense was amenable to the trial schedule.
- Prosecution cross o Bakit di nireport threat? Objection, Argumentative. Sustained. o Have you told anybody the threat? No. That’s all. - Third witness o Are you with other accused at sept 10. How can you prove? I have a video. And what is shown in the video? IT shows Po1 talking to other accuse. - Prosecution cross o Was the threat includd in video? No. That’s all - Tanong judge when gusto iset final judgment. Tanong prosecution if amenable sila sa sched - Hearing adjourned/ - PROMULGATION OG JUDGMENT o FINAL VERDICT o Kamayan ng attorneys - Arraignment o RTC barach eme is now in session honorable eme now precides. o Prayer o Ito yung pinakauna nagpapakilala ang lawyers. o Set ng schedule for trial ang prosecution tanong if amenable sa defense
MOCK TRIAL RAPE
- Medico-legal expert witness for prosecution
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPINES VS. EDWARD DIAZ
- Dating judge. All rise - Prayer - Judge stating: Members of the … determine whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty… the prosecution must prove that a crime was committed and that the defendant is the person who committed the crime… guilt of the… - Mr… what… Your honor today’s case is the criminal case number 54828 POTP vs. Cyrus Abueva rape case. - Prosecution is ready? Yes, your honor. BE seated. Defense is ready? Yes your honor be seated. - We will now hear opening statement of prosecution, Ms. Eme please state your case - Thank you, your honor. My name is Atty. Girl last name, we’re offering testimony of this witness to prove the… allegation in this… - Opening statement of defense. - Prosecution, who is the first witness? - First witness is the victim herself. o Is she ready? o Yes, your honor. o Swearing of victim. o MS. Victim, do you know Mr. Cyrus Abueva, the accused in this case? o Yes Ma’am. o Do you know him personally? o Yes he was my suitor for 8 years.
United States of America Ex Rel. Andrew Perry, Petitioner-Respondent v. William F. Mulligan, Chief Probation Officer For Essex County, New Jersey, 544 F.2d 674, 3rd Cir. (1976)