Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Click On The Three Dots (On Right) For Interpreting Evaluation Criteria Document 2

    Uploaded by

    sara olivares
    6 views1 page
    The document discusses a survey of interpreters around the world about quality criteria in interpreting. It presents two comparative rankings of quality criteria from previous studies in 2004 and 1986. It asks the reader to discuss each criterion and their order of importance with a partner, and to then compile a list of 5 peer-review criteria for consecutive interpreting based on their recent practice.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Click on the three dots (on right) for interpreting evaluation criteria document 2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses a survey of interpreters around the world about quality criteria in interpreting. It presents two comparative rankings of quality criteria from previous studies in 2004 and 1986. It asks the reader to discuss each criterion and their order of importance with a partner, and to then compile a list of 5 peer-review criteria for consecutive interpreting based on their recent practice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Click On The Three Dots (On Right) For Interpreting Evaluation Criteria Document 2

    Uploaded by

    sara olivares
    The document discusses a survey of interpreters around the world about quality criteria in interpreting. It presents two comparative rankings of quality criteria from previous studies in 2004 and 1986. It asks the reader to discuss each criterion and their order of importance with a partner, and to then compile a list of 5 peer-review criteria for consecutive interpreting based on their recent practice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    CRITERIA FOR QUALITY IN INTERPRETING

    Chiaro and Nocella (2004) surveyed interpreters throughout the world  to see their perceptions on
    quality criteria. Please see the comparative ranking of quality criteria below and discuss with your
    partner each criterion and the order of importance according to the classification below. Do you
    agree?

    Following this discussion and based on your interpreting practice over the last few weeks,
    compile a list of 5 peer-review criteria to be used in relation to consecutive interpreting.

    Comparative Ranking of Quality Criteria

    Chiaro & Nocella (2004) Bühler (1986)

    1. consistency with the original sense consistency with original message

    2. completeness of information logical cohesion of utterance

    3. logical cohesion use of correct terminology

    4. fluency of delivery fluency of delivery

    5. correct grammatical usage correct grammatical usage

    6. correct terminology completeness of interpretation

    7. appropriate style pleasant voice

    8. pleasant voice native accent

    9. native accent appropriate style

    Source: https://lourdesderioja.com/2013/04/24/the-issue-of-quality/

    You might also like