The document discusses Caroline's termination from her job and whether it was justified. It asks if Caroline should have been terminated according to company policy without a signed contract, and examines the differences between libel and slander in relation to Caroline's situation. The document determines that Caroline was not terminated for defamation.
The document discusses Caroline's termination from her job and whether it was justified. It asks if Caroline should have been terminated according to company policy without a signed contract, and examines the differences between libel and slander in relation to Caroline's situation. The document determines that Caroline was not terminated for defamation.
The document discusses Caroline's termination from her job and whether it was justified. It asks if Caroline should have been terminated according to company policy without a signed contract, and examines the differences between libel and slander in relation to Caroline's situation. The document determines that Caroline was not terminated for defamation.
1. Do you agree with the Supreme Court of North Dakota here?
2. Should Caroline have been terminated?
written warning and meeting 3. How does company policy come into play here? Professionalism and conduct; no signed contract meaning no code of conduct; HIPPA in 1996 4. Discuss the difference between libel and slander.
5. Was Caroline terminated for defamation?
No
Caroline did not sign a written employment contract with Griggs.