Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ariful Alam
Associate Professor
Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics
Chap – 6 : Hybridization
Hybridization:
The act of mixing different species or varieties of animals or plants and thus to produce hybrids is called
hybridization. Hybridization is considered as inter-specific between two breeds, strains, species or even
genus. Hybridization uses the dominant genetic variance (VD). The phenotype obtained through hybridization
is not heritable, i.e. the result of hybridization is unpredictable. It is produced anew in each generation. Two
superior parents may not necessarily produce superior offspring.
Uses of Hybridization:
1. It can be used as a quick and dirty method before selection will be employed.
2. It can be used to improve productivity whether h2 is large or small. When h2 is small, hybridization is
the only practical way to improve productivity.
3. Hybridization can be incorporated into a selection program as a final step to produce animals for
grow-out.
4. Production of new breeds or strains.
5. Production of uniform products.
6. Production of monosex populations.
7. Production of sterile individuals.
8. It can be used to improve a wild fishery.
Recurrent selection:
A selection program that can be used to improve the results of hybridization. If selection is done with one of
the parental groups, it is called recurrent selection. If it is done both parental groups, it is called reciprocal
recurrent selection.
Gene introgression:
Gene introgression is the incorporation of genes of one species into the gene pool of another species. This
process of introgressive hybridization can cause the genetic loss of an entire species, sub-species or unique
population.
Heterosis:
The superiority or inferiority of hybrids over the parents is called heterosis. Heterosis (H) can be determined
by using the following formula:
Example:
Example:
Some of the tilapia sp. have the XY-sex determining system while other have the WZ-sex determining
system. The proper combination of sex chromosome in the parents will result in all male progeny. That
combination is produced by the hybridization of XX females with ZZ males.
Dr. Md. Ariful Alam
Associate Professor
Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics
For example, the hybridization of a Tilapia nilotica female (XX) x Tilapia hornorum male (ZZ) will produce
a monosex population.
X Z
Firstly, many tilapia culturists cannot or will not be maintain the pure spp.
Secondly, because of autosomal sex influencing or sex modifying genes, such gene turns some males
into females.
In this why, hybridization cannot produce good brood stock.
Dominant genetic variance is created anew and in different combinations each generation and its effects are
basicaly those based on luck. Fish that are superior because of certain interactions are superior because of
fortuitous combination of alleles that produces the desireable interaction in the progeny and thus improve
productivity.
Additive genetic variance and VD are diametrically opposed; consequently, selection and crossbreeding are
also diametrically opposed. In selection one can choice fish based on individual or family merit in the hope
that the next generation will closely approximate those one have chosen. In crossbreeding, the next
generation does not have to approximate the brooders, and unless the cross was made previously, one cannot
predict the outcome of a mating to produce F 1 hybrids.
Dr. Md. Ariful Alam
Associate Professor
Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics
Outbreeding Depression
Outbreeding depression refers to cases when offspring from crosses between individuals from different
populations have lower fitness than progeny from crosses between individuals from the same population.
The resulting offspring may have reduced sruvival and lower reproductive success, i.e., reduced fitness.
1. First, selection in one population might produce a large body size, whereas in another population
small body size might be more advantageous. Gene flow between these populations may lead to
individuals with intermediate body sizes, which may not be adaptive in either population.
2. A second way outbreeding depression can occur is by the breakdown of biochemical or
physiological compatibilities between genes in the different populations. Within local, isolated
populations, alleles are selected for their positive, overall effects on the local genetic background.
Due to nonadditive gene action, the same genes may have rather different average effects in different
genetic backgrounds--hence, the potential evolution of locally coadapted gene complexes.
In other words, individuals from Population A will tend to have genes selected for the quality of combining
well with gene combinations common in Population A. However, genes found in Population A will not have
been selected for the quality of crossing well with genes common in Population B. Therefore outbreeding can
undermine vitality by reducing positive epistasis and/or increasing negative epistasis.
As a general rule of hybrid vigor, is strongest in first generation hybrids and gets weaker over time. In
contrast, outbreeding depression can be relatively weak in the first generation. But outside the context of
ruthless selective pressure, outbreeding depression will increase in power through the further generations as
co-adapted gene complexes are broken apart without the forging of new co-adapted gene complexes to take
their place.
Outbreeding Depression
Outbreeding depression is a decrease in fitness of progeny upon breakup of coadapted gene complexes
resulting from mating of distantly related individuals (Dobzhansky 1937). Although untested in freshwater
mussels, outbreeding depression has posed a threat to population viability in some species of marine bivalve
mollusks (Lannan 1980a, Lannan 1980b, Gaffney et al. 1993, Boudry et al. 2002). We hypothesize that
mussel species and populations that have limited dispersal capabilities and that are subject to local
environmental selection pressures may have developed coadapted gene complexes for adaptation to such
environments, to include local host fish communities. For example, recent research on fish host specificity
has demonstrated that glochidia obtained from allopatric mussel populations can exhibit significant among-
population variation in transformation success when exposed to local fish host communities (Rogers et al.
2001, Eckert 2003, Jones et al. 2006). Other factors, such as differences in various life history parameters
(e.g., spawning seasonality), population demographic parameters, physiological response to water quality
(e.g., differences in local geochemistry) and other potentially adaptive traits should be assessed by biologists.
Thus, we suspect that some populations of freshwater mussels may be vulnerable to outbreeding depression,
and mixing distinct populations may disrupt genetic adaptation to local environmental conditions.
Dr. Md. Ariful Alam
Associate Professor
Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics