Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: M. Zulkifli and Wahyu Triyoso 2022 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2243 012007 - Spatial Modeling of Tsunami Impact in
Manado City using Geographic Information
System
J C Kumaat, S T B Kandoli and F Laeloma
e-mail : zulkifligeoph45@gmail.com
1. Introduction
Manado City is relatively the densest population in North Sulawesi Province and one of the economic
centers in Eastern Indonesia due to it is a supply chain in the trade and tourism sector. [1].
Seismotectonically, this city has the potential to be impacted by earthquake due to it is located in a
seismically active area. The Regional tectonic interactions such as divergent double subduction (DDS)
activity of the Molucca Sea Plate [2], North Sulawesi trench [3], and active faults as earthquake
generators. Therefore, the area to have high seismicity.
The earthquake occured in March 2021 Mw 4.3 hypocenter in land at a depth of 10 km was felt III-
IV MMI in Manado City. The source of this earthquake was identified as a background source due to
it unclear seismogenic, not from subduction or fault. This event showed that the contribution of the
earthquake from the background source affects the ground shaking in the Manado city.
Manado City has been shaked by destructive earthquakes several times based on Records of past
events were sourced from the BMKG catalog in 2018 (Table 1) [4]. The 2014 Mw 7.4 earthquake,
This earthquake was reported to have damaged several houses, hotels and bridges. The 1997 Mw 7.0
earthquake, recorded 90 damaged buildings in Manado City and several other significant earthquakes
that have been well documented. However, the challenges faced today is earthquake cannot be
predicted accurately, destructive, and fatality.
As an effort to reduce risk, earthquake-resistant building designs are designed with the aim of be
able to withstand ground shaking without causing excessive damage [5]. Seismic hazard analysis
(SHA) is one of the ideal standard methods to calculate the magnitude of the ground shaking level
(PGA) due to earthquakes as well as a reference for estimating the risk of loss in an infrastructure
dwelling [6].
The previous study, the 2017 National Earthquake Study Center (PUSGEN) [7] has released source
and hazard maps in Indonesia. However, the results of the study was limited to a regional scale. PSHA
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
9th Asian Physics Symposium 2021 (APS 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243 (2022) 012007 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012007
microzonation (probabilistic seismic hazard analysis) needs to be done to show in more detail the
potential for local scale seismic hazard. We use the PSHA method in this study to extend how the
background source contributes to produce ground shaking (PGA) in Manado City.
2
9th Asian Physics Symposium 2021 (APS 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243 (2022) 012007 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012007
3
9th Asian Physics Symposium 2021 (APS 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243 (2022) 012007 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012007
Deep Strike slip (0.5) Geomatrix subduction (Youngs et al. 1997) (0.33)
Background Reverse (0.25) Atkinson and Boore 2007 (0.33)
Normal (0.25 Atkinson–Boore intraslab (0.33)
In this study, PSHA calculations was conducted using software from USGS [22]. The analysis
includes a probability of exceedence 10% in 50 years in bedrock with a return period of 500 years.
The large value of seismcity rate means that the region has a relatively high frequency of earthquake
occurrences [13]. Where areas with relatively high frequency values tend to produce relatively small
to moderate earthquake magnitudes. In Figure 2 it can be seen that the location of the city of Manado
is marked by a black rectangle which has an earthquake production of about 0.02. The value of this
seismcity rate is obtained from the declustering catalog so that the results obtained are the mainshocks.
Furthermore, we integrate seismicity smoothing data to distribution of seismicity rate in each grid to
PSHA input. This model reveals that the contribution of the source background to soil shaking in
Manado City in the bedrock for probability of passing 10% in 50 years is 0.18 ≥ g ≤0.19 (figure 3).
The largest PGA value is located in the center of Manado City, which is 0.19 g. Based on the
earthquake vulnerability index released by BNPB [23] explained that the contribution of PGA with a
value of <0.2501 g is classified as a low index. This shows that the contribution of background sources
to the seismic hazard in Mando City is relatively low.
4
9th Asian Physics Symposium 2021 (APS 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243 (2022) 012007 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012007
Figure 2. Plot Smoothed rate distribution with a correlation distance of 50 km. The black rectangle is
represented the Manado city.
Figure 3. PSHA map of Manado City from background sources for probability of passing 10% in 50
years in bedrock T = 0 second.
5
9th Asian Physics Symposium 2021 (APS 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243 (2022) 012007 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012007
Based on earthquake occured in March 2021 Mw 4.3 hypocenter in land at a depth of 10 km was felt
III-IV MMI in Manado City. The source of this earthquake was unidentified. Therefore, we mentioned
as a background source due to it unclear seismogenic. This event showed that the contribution of the
earthquake from the background source affects the ground shaking in the Manado city. Considering
that the Manado city as Capital of North Sulawesi Capital that has relatively increased growth
population accompanied by significant infrastructure development [1]. it can be seen in the Indonesian
government's policy of building highway infrastructure from Manado to Bitung and from Manado to
Likupang, and also the construction of several infrastructure like bridges and tourism facilities.
Figure 4 is plot of the PSHA hazard curve between PGA and POE (probability of exceedance) in
manado City. It can be noted that PGA and POE is inversely. When the probability of exceedance
(POE) is increased so the PGA value is decreased. it can be explains that when the POE value is large,
the return period of the earthquake becomes shorter, therefore it is less likely that a large earthquake
will occur compared to an earthquake with a longer (longer) return period.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank the Postgraduate Program in Earth Sciences, Faculty of Earth Science and
Technology, Bandung Institute of Technology, for supporting the publication of this paper. The
authors also thank the Agency for Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics (BMKG) for funding
the publication of this paper. Special thanks are intended to Dr. Afnimar for the valuable suggestions
and comments..
6
9th Asian Physics Symposium 2021 (APS 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243 (2022) 012007 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012007
References
[1] Central Agency of Statistics. (2020). North Sulawesi Province in Figures 2020. ISBN : 0215-
2274.
[2] Zhang Q, Guo F, Zhao L, Wu Y, 2017. Geodynamics of divergent double subduction: 3-D
numerical modeling of a Cenozoic example in the Molucca Sea region, Indonesia
[3] Hall, R. (2018). The subduction initiation stage of the Wilson cycle. Geological
Society,London, Special Publications, SP470.3. doi:10.1144/sp4703.
[4] Sadly M, Triyono R, Prasetya T, Daryono, Yatimantoro T, Anggraini S, Rahayu R H,
Priyobudi, Setiyono U, Gunawan I, Yogaswara DS, Apriani M, Kriswinarso T, Julius A M,
Hidayanti, Anugerah S D. (2018). Catalogue of Significant and Destructive Earthquakes in
1821-2018. BMKG Earthquake and Tsunami Center.
[5] Asrurifak M, Irsyam, M, Budiono, B, Triyoso, W, Hendriyawan. (2010). Development of
Spectral Hazard Map for Indonesia with a Return Period of 2500 Years using Probabilistic
Method. Civil Engineering Dimension, Vol. 12, No. 1, March 2010, 52-62 ISSN 1410-9530
ISSN 1979-570.
[6] Petersen, M.D., Harmsen, S.C., Jaiswal, K.S., Rukstales, K.S., Luco, N., Haller, K.M., Mueller,
C.S., and Shumway, A.M., 2018, Seismic Hazard, Risk, and Design for South America: U.S.
Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7Wm1BK1.
[7] Irsyam M, Cummins PR, Asrurifak M, Faizal F, Danny Hilman Natawidjaja DH, Widiyantoro S
, Meilano I, Triyoso W, Rudiyanto A, Hidayati S, Ridwan M, Hanifa NR, and Syahbana AJ
.(2020). Development of the 2017 national seismic hazard maps of Indonesia. Earthquake
Spectra journals, doi: 10.1177/8755293020951206.
[8] Wiemer, S., 2001. A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismological Research
Letters, 72(3), pp.373-382 https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.72.3.373
[9] Frankel, A. (1995). Mapping seismic hazard in the central and eastern United States.
Seismological Research Letters, 66(4), 8-21.
[10] Triyoso W, Suwondo A, Yudistira T, and Sahara DP. (2020) Seismic Hazard Function (SHF)
study of coastal sources of Sumatra Island: SHF evaluation of Padang and Bengkulu cities,
Geosci. Lett. (2020) 7:2, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-020-00151-x
[11] Esri. "Topographic" [basemap]. Scale Not Given. "World Topographic Map".
February19,2021.http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=30e5fe3149c34df1ba922e6f5b
bf808f. (July 26, 2021).
[12] Petersen, Mark D., Mueller, Charles S., Frankel, Arthur D., Zeng, Yuehua, (2008) Spatial
Seismicity Rates and Maximum Magnitudes for Background Earthquakes, USGS Open-File
Report.
[13] Gutenberg, B., and Richter, C., 1944. Frequency of earhquakes in California. Bulletin of the
Seismological Society of America, 34, 185–188.
[14] Boore DM and Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average
horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01
s and 10.0 s. Earthquake Spectra 24(1): 99–138
[15] Campbell KW and Bozorgnia Y (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean
horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for
periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthquake Spectra 24(1): 139–171.
[16] Chiou B, Darragh R, Gregor N and Silva W (2008) NGA project strong-motion database.
Earthquake Spectra 24(1): 23–44.
[17] Youngs RR, Chiou SJ, Silva WJ and Humphrey JR (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation
relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 68(1): 58–73.
[18] Atkinson GM and Dan Boore DM (2003) Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-
zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bulletin of the
Seismological Society of America 93(4): 1703–1729.
[19] Atkinson, G.M., and Boore, D.M., 2007. Erratum – earthquake ground-motion prediction
7
9th Asian Physics Symposium 2021 (APS 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243 (2022) 012007 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012007
equations for eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97,
1032.
[20] Power MS, Coppersmith KJ, Youngs RR, Schwartz DP and dan Swan RH (1981) Seismic
exposure analysis for the WNP-2 and WNP-1/4 site: Appendix 2.5K to Amendment No. 18.
Final Safety Analysis Report for WNP-2, San Francisco, CA: Woodward-Clyde Consultants,
p. 63.
[21] Cornel, C.A. (1968). Engineering Seismic Risk Analysis, Bulletin of the Seismological Society
of America. Vol 58, No.5: 1583-1606.
[22] Harmsen, S., 2008. USGS Software for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA), Draft
Document, received by hand (unpublished).
[23] BNPB,2012. Regulation of the Head of the National Disaster Management Agency Number 02
of 2012 concerning General Guidelines for Disaster Risk Assessment.