This document provides an overview of different finite element modeling approaches for undrained soil response. It discusses consolidation analysis, undrained analysis considering incompressible behavior and total stresses (Method C), and undrained analysis considering nearly incompressible behavior and effective stresses (Method A/B). Method C assumes volume incompressibility by modifying Poisson's ratio, while Method A/B modifies stiffness terms to account for water bulk modulus. Sections 2.3 and 2.4 will cover Methods C and A/B in more detail, respectively.
Original Description:
saturation
Original Title
Section 2.2 Finite Element Modeling of Undrained Response (A Brief Overview)
This document provides an overview of different finite element modeling approaches for undrained soil response. It discusses consolidation analysis, undrained analysis considering incompressible behavior and total stresses (Method C), and undrained analysis considering nearly incompressible behavior and effective stresses (Method A/B). Method C assumes volume incompressibility by modifying Poisson's ratio, while Method A/B modifies stiffness terms to account for water bulk modulus. Sections 2.3 and 2.4 will cover Methods C and A/B in more detail, respectively.
This document provides an overview of different finite element modeling approaches for undrained soil response. It discusses consolidation analysis, undrained analysis considering incompressible behavior and total stresses (Method C), and undrained analysis considering nearly incompressible behavior and effective stresses (Method A/B). Method C assumes volume incompressibility by modifying Poisson's ratio, while Method A/B modifies stiffness terms to account for water bulk modulus. Sections 2.3 and 2.4 will cover Methods C and A/B in more detail, respectively.
Undrained Response (A Brief Overview of Different Approaches)
2.2-1 1.1-1 Learning Objective
Learning Objective
In this subsection, we will provide a brief
overview of the different methods available for modeling the undrained response in a saturated soil using finite element analysis.
2.2-2 Different Methods for Modeling Undrained Response
There are a few different methods for modeling
undrained response in finite element analysis. i. Consolidation Analysis
ii. Undrained Analysis by considering
incompressible behavior and total stresses (commonly known as Method C)
iii. Undrained Analysis by considering nearly
incompressible behavior and effective stresses (commonly known as Method A or Method B) 2.2-3 i. Consolidation Analysis for Modeling Undrained Response The key features of consolidation analysis are as follows: • This is the most general approach for analyzing the response of a saturated soil in that it can be used to analyze the undrained (immediate or short-term), partially drained (intermediate duration) and fully drained (long-term). • The time-dependent response of the effective stresses and the excess pore pressures in the soil mass can be obtained. That is, the results allow us to plot the time histories of the effective stresses and excess pore pressures generated in the soil mass due to the applied loadings. • The undrained response can be obtained by setting the time to be a sufficiently small value. • The method is formulated using Biot’s theory of consolidation, coupled with the equation of equilibrium from continuum mechanics. • We will study consolidation analysis and its FEM formulation in detail later in the module. 2.2-4 ii. Undrained Analysis – Incompressible, Total Stress Approach The key FEM features of the incompressible, total stress approach are: • The saturated soil is still analyzed as a single phase medium as per the method and discussions of Section 1 and CE4257. • The undrained response is achieved by imposing the condition of volumetric incompressibility under the applied loading. This is because, under undrained condition, the soil mass will deform such that its overall volume cannot change • In the FEM analysis, the condition for volumetric incompressibility can be achieved by setting the Poisson’s ratio to a value very close to 0.5, say 0.49 or 0.495. (Why can’t the value of = 0.5 be used?) Note that in adopting a modified value of the Poisson’s ratio, the other parameters of the soil model may also be modified. • The results of the FEM analysis will provide us with the correct deformation and total stresses due to the applied loading. However, it will not yield values of the excess pore pressures that are generated. • If values of the effective stresses and excess pore pressures are 2.2-5 required, then this method will not be appropriate. iii. Undrained Analysis – Incompressible, Effective Stress Approach The key FEM features of the incompressible, effective stress approach are: • The saturated soil is still analyzed as a single phase medium as per the method and discussions of Section 1 and CE4257. • Similar to the previous method, the undrained response is also achieved by imposing the condition of volumetric incompressibility under the applied loading. • In this method, however, the incompressibility constraint is achieved by modifying the original D matrix of the soil element, through the addition of a very large value to the stiffness terms to simulate the contribution of the bulk modulus of water. • Unlike the previous method, which requires the use of a modified Poisson’s ratio (which in turn affects the other parameters too) to achieve incompressibility, this method makes use of the ‘effective’ material parameters to form the D-matrix, before incorporating the effect of the water bulk modulus. • Using this method, the FEM analysis can provide us with the correct deformation, effective stresses and excess pore pressures 2.2-6 due to the applied loading. Summary
• We have briefly looked at three methods of modeling the
undrained response of saturated soils in this subsection. • For now, we will focus on the second and third methods which treats the soil as a single-phase medium and imposes a volumetric incompressibility constraint to enforce undrained condition.
• Section 2.3 covers the incompressible, total stress
approach. (Method C)
• Section 2.4 presents the formulation of the nearly
incompressible, effective stress approach. (Method A or B)