Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Torsional Vibration
By
S. Matebese
220069011
Date: 10/04/2023
Acknowledgements
I would like to give special thanks to the Department of Mechanical and Industrial
Engineering Technology for allowing me to run this lab and write a report as a method to
put theory into reality.I would like to further give thanks to the lecturer Dr. F.K.
Tekweme, the lab technician Mr. Tlali and the module tutors for providing the necessary
guidance, equipment, and information.
Aim
The aim of this experiment goes as follows:
Assumptions
The hypothesis evolved from the torsion equation in material strength. This theory
was subsequently combined with oscillation theory to develop the periodic time
equation. The following are the assumptions that were made during the theory's
development: -
• The shaft's plane cross-section remains unaltered after a given angular displacement
[1].
q = Torsional stiffness
2. Apparatus
1. HVT10 Torsiona vibration apparatus
2. Stopwatch
Figure 2: HVT10 Torsional Vibration
3. Procedure
2. The magnetic pointer was set to zero degrees on the rotating scale.
3. The chuck above the disc was then subjected to a disruptive force.
4. A timer was then used to time how long it took to attain 20 oscillations.
6. The ring was taken from the upper support and placed on top of the disc after 20
oscillations.
10. The ring was then placed to the disc and spilt ring configuration after 20
oscillations.
4. Results
Ring =0.049
Mass
moment of No. of
Rotor Time (s)
inertia Oscillations
(kgm^2)
Disc 0.089 20 15
Disc + Ring 0.138 20 19
Disc + Spilt ring 0.186 20 22
Ring + Spilt ring +
0.235 20 25
Disc
5. Analysis of Results
Periodic time vs √I
1.400
1.200
Periodic time, tp (s)
1.000
0.800
0.600
0.400
0.200
0.000
0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400 0.450 0.500
Sqaure root mass moment of inertia, √I (√(kgm^2))
Sample calculations
For Disc:
2
I =0.089 kg m
N=20
t =15 s
t
Experiemental periodic time , t pe =
N
15
t pe=
20
∴ t pe =0.75 s /oscillation
π d4
J=
32
(π )(0.00475)4
¿
32
−11 4
∴ J =4.998× 10 m
L1=L2=Le =0.425 m
2GJ
q=
Le
∴ q=19.757 Nm
¿2π
√ 0.089
19.757
∴ t p =0.422 s
0.422−0.75
¿ × 100
0.422
∴ %Error=77.73
6. Conclusion
The acquired experimental data was used to determine the outcomes. Section 7
displays the acquired results. Graph 1 shows that the periodic time is directly
proportional to the square root of the mass moment of inertia. This is consistent with
theory: when the mass moment of inertia increases, the system takes longer to attain
the required oscillations due to increased resistance. It is also demonstrated that the
percentage error is in the 70-80 range which is extremely not good. This could be due
to human error during the results generation process. The system was also mounted
vertically, and gravity effects were ignored. This also contributed to the calculating
inaccuracy. Excessive use of rods.
7. References
[1] Drotsky, J. (©2011). Strength of Materials for Technicians (4th edition). Cape
Town: Pearson.
[2] Khurmi, R.S. and Gupta, J.K. (©2005). Theory of Machines. New Dehli: S. Chand
& Co. Ltd.
8. Recommendations
9. It is recommended that an automatic or sensing mechanism be used for the timing
of the oscillations.
10. It also recommended that a digital measuring device be used to measure the
number of oscillations.