Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Educational Technology
management - which have surfaced as key success/ • Analytical - monitor, evaluate, and improve the
failure factors in recent e-learning research and evalua- system.
tion studies. • a Leader-by-example - model online teaching best-
A third example is the emphasis placed on "building practices.
a learning community," which is also elevated to the
The paper addresses each of these five areas in turn,
macro-level as opposed to being buried in the micro-
first to establish its importance in the online teaching
detail, as in the NZCS and IBSTPI models. It is interesting
context, and then to suggest strategies, skills, and atti-
to speculate whether this is the result of a somewhat
tudes that the online teacher should strive to develop. This
more constructivist/humanist (some would say, "as
model is of interest, as it introduces a number of areas of
opposed to ISD") philosophical perspective of those
online teaching competence (or maybe of teaching com-
responsible for the development of the COTS model, or
petence in general) that are not clearly addressed in the
just a reflection of the way that online learning is moving
other models so far analyzed. The "Be Organized" and "Be
towards ever greater practical use of collaborative group
Analytical" domains are largely equivalent to the plan-
work, communities of practice, and social networking.
ning/preparation and assessment/evaluation competency
areas in the other models, but the "Be Visible," "Be
5. The VOCAL model of online teaching competen-
Compassionate," and "Be a Leader-by-example" domains
cies. This model is described in (J. R. Savery, 2005) "BE
VOCAL: Characteristics of Successful Online Instructors"
suggest many new and insightful additions to the overall
"mix" of online teaching competencies.
(Journal of Interactive Online Learning , 4(2) - accessed
Quite clearly, all of the models presented here overlap
online at www.ncolr.org/jiol). John Savery, the author, and
in part with each other, but each one also adds some
presumably inventor of the model's name as well as its
unique and valuable perspectives which strengthen and
substance, prefaces his description of the model with the
caveat that to "BE VOCAL" does NOT mean that instruc-
enrich our theoretical understanding and practical
approaches to the professional development of online
tors need to "talk" a lot. Rather, it means that online
teachers. Should we therefore build our own model by
instructors should (strive to) be:
integrating aspects from each of the models described in
• Visible- establish a social presence. the literature? Or should we first seek to validate the
• Organized - with plans, presentations, practice, models through research? In the sources accessed, only
timing. the IBSTPI model reports the results of validation - and
• Compassionate - in handling students' problems. this is restricted to expert opinions. However...