Professional Documents
Culture Documents
epartment of Education
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
DepED Region IV – A
CALABARZON
Guide and Tools
May 2015
I. INTRODUCTION
Central to the present educational reforms are the curriculum/learning localization and
the harmonization of curriculum-related programs and projects. The former ensures that
learning becomes culturally sensitive and relevant while the latter answers the need to unify
and strengthen curriculum support programs and learning opportunities for diverse learners.
The goal of the Curriculum and Learning Management (CLM) System is to support
the curriculum managers and implementers in ensuring the effectiveness, efficiency,
sustainability, and impact of the implementation of the K to 12 basic education
curriculum
and the various curricular programs and projects.
Sets regional standards, critical processes and tools for curriculum program
implementation through strategic planning, advocacy, pilot-tests, region-wide
operations and assessment
Promotes the practice of the critical processes and tools for curriculum localization
with adherence to set standards of the region
Establishes the full operationalization of the Learning Resource Management and
Development System (LRMDS)
Utilizes research as an integral part of curriculum, instruction and learner
development
Integrates the system for technical assistance at the region, division and school
levels
Embeds the systematic practice of monitoring, evaluation and reporting at all levels
of program implementation
Page 2
III. FUNCTIONS OF THE CURRICULUM AND LEARNING MANAGEMENT
DIVISION (CLMD-REGIONAL OFFICE) AND CURRICULUM
IMPLEMENTATION (CI-DIVISION OFFICE
Region:
To ensure full implementation of the articulated basic education curriculum, its
localization/indigenization and increase access to quality and varied learning
resources towards improvement in the quality of learning outcomes.
programs for all types of learners and oversee its implementation, monitoring
and evaluation
Manage the conduct of field research on curriculum and instruction in support of
Monitor and evaluate the pilot of learning models and strategies for special
Evaluate, quality assure and approve localized learning resources for regional
use
Page 3
Conduct research on the utilization of learning resources to inform curriculum
Division:
To ensure full implementation of the articulated basic education curriculum through
localization/indigenization and innovations in teaching the various subject-areas
towards improvement in the quality of learning outcomes.
special programs for all types of learners in compliance to national and regional
standards
Provide learning support to schools and LCs for the effective implementation of
Monitor and evaluate the implementation of the basic curriculum and co-
Conduct studies on curriculum and instruction and utilize research findings for
delivery systems and assessment modes for all types of learners consistent with
Implement and monitor the special needs education in public and private schools
Pilot learning models and strategies for special needs education (Madrasah
identified schools
Evaluate, quality assure and approve localized learning resources for division
Develop materials for various delivery systems and the use of ICT
Page 4
CLMD
resources
- Disseminate and utilize research findings into a practical and doable manner
curriculum implementation
instructional supervision
SIP implementation
Coordinate and represent DepED in the Municipal School Board and ensure that
municipality
Coordinate with other agencies both internal and external in resource generation
and linkages
delivery systems and assessment modes for all types of learners consistent with
mobilization
adaptation
Page 5
Schools: Roles and Responsibilities of Heads and Teachers
The Curriculum and Learning Management Division (CLMD) of the Regional Office
and the Curriculum Implementation (CI) of the Schools Division Office are expected to
operationalize the CLM System. This system guides all curriculum managers and
implementers to exercise their functions and to ensure the effectiveness, efficiency,
sustainability, and impact of the implementation of the basic education curriculum and
various curricular programs and projects.
Program Implementation
Curriculum Localization
Technical Assistance
Page 6
The national Basic Education Curriculum or the K to 12 Curriculum including the
various curricular programs and projects serve as the trigger for the operationalization of the
CLM System. In order to fully implement the Basic Education Curriculum, the field
managers and implementers have to go through important critical processes. Such critical
processes are clustered in each of the five components mentioned above.
Technical assistance, being a significant function of the region and the schools
division, has to be systematically provided by the Curriculum and Learning Management
personnel themselves to support the implementers of the curriculum at the school level.
Technical assistance can also be provided hand in hand with the Field Effectiveness Division
Core Team. The CLM personnel can also coordinate with the Training and Development
Team for Capability Building or teacher training as one of the forms of rendering technical
assistance to curriculum implementers.
Another component that has primordial role in the Curriculum and Learning
Management System is Research, Monitoring and Evaluation. Curriculum implementation is
pregnant with data and information that may be gathered, analyzed and reported that
may
inform decision-making or policy formulation. It is important for the system to capture these
realities as they unfold in the process of curriculum development and instruction as
experienced in actual context.
The framework of the Curriculum Learning and Management System likewise reflects
the structural flow of management and implementation from the region to the Divisions, to
the Schools and vice-versa that guides the personnel in the performance of their respective
functions.
At the School level, District Supervisors and School Heads supervise the teachers
through classroom observations such that the teaching-learning programs and
activities are aligned to the national and localized curriculum standards.
Page 7
Expectedly, in the course of undertaking the various critical processes in the
different components, there must be the feedback-giving from the schools to the
division level, then from the division to the regional level. The CLM Core team in
turn, provides timely, relevant, reliable and valid feedbacks to the Central Office for
possible policy reformulation/adjustments, for curriculum instruction enhancement,
for research venture, for strategic planning and technical assistance and even for
getting financial support to sustain the implementation of the different programs and
projects.
Program Implementation
Curriculum Localization
Development and Advocacy of the
Regional Framework for CL
Community Mapping of the Local
Learning Systems (LLS)
Integration of LLS into the BEC
K to 12
Region: Oversee/manage full implementation of the articulated basic education curriculum, its
lization/ indigenization and increase access to quality and varied learning resources
loca
towards improvement in the quality of learning outcomes.
Division: Implement the localized basic education curriculum, supervise and support instruction for all
types of learners
School: Implement teaching-learning programs and activities aligned to the national and localized
curriculum standards
Page 8
The Critical Processes
The components and critical processes of the CLM System as presented in the figure are
explained below.
A. Program Implementation
The very first step and most critical of the processes for the successful curriculum
program implementation is strategic planning. Through strategic planning, the long-term
directions and desired goals and objectives are identified and how can these be achieved are
outlined. It involves setting the strategic vision and desired outcomes of the organization.
Action/work plans are developed in an organized and systematic manner in order to
operationalize the strategic plan through identification of activities/tasks, responsibilities,
resources and milestones. Planning is geared towards the effective and efficient
implementation of the programs and projects.
A.2. Advocacy
Page 9
an impact on the learners‘ lives. How it will reach the classrooms is the responsibility of the
Region through the Schools Divisions. This is done through the guidance of a carefully
crafted regional curriculum policy framework and corresponding program implementation
plans and seeing to it that these plans are actively implemented, objectively monitored
and
regularly evaluated.
A.5. Assessment
Assessment as learning is the use of a task or an activity for learner to use assessment
to improve their own learning. Self and peer assessments, often with the guidance of the
teacher, are strategies that allow them to reflect and identify areas of strengths and needs.
Through these tasks, the learners are able to examine themselves as learners and become
aware of how they learn. Assessment as learning helps learner to take more responsibility for
their own learning and to monitor their future directions.
B. Curriculum Localization
The learning systems, to a large extent, remain untapped within the formal school
system because of the preponderance of the mainstream cultural systems to acquire, generate
and apply knowledge. To a certain extent, the students who will come to school experience
some form of disorientation because of the gap between their own sub culture‘s way of
acquiring and generating knowledge and that of the mainstream culture generally adapted by
the formal school. The role of the school is not to ignore or replace prior understanding, but
to recognize and make connections to that understanding. It assumes that there are multiple
Page 10
ways of viewing, structuring, and transmitting knowledge about the world—each with its
own insights and limitations.
How will the indigenous/ local knowledge that students bring to class be used to make
learning of new ideas meaningful within the context of his/her own experience?
There is a need to consider the elements that make up these indigenous/local learning
systems as illustrated in the figure below.
CONTEXT
CC
OO
NN
TT
EE
XX
TT
Page 11
The elements as presented in the figure are explained below:
The Context -The indigenous/ local learning system is strongly shaped and formed by
the
context in which it operates. In fact, it is the context that determines the content and process
of this local learning system. The context refers to the geographical, political, cultural,
economic and social conditions prevailing in a particular community. The context determines
the different elements: content, learning process, language used and resources available for
learning.
Local Content - The content refers to the concepts, ideas, cultural practices and beliefs that
people use to make sense of their immediate world. A fishing village, for example will
probably have more concepts related to fishing, water systems, marine life. It is important
for the mainstream curriculum to use this local content as examples or illustrations for
teaching new concepts and principles.
Local Learning Process - This process refers to the ways by which people learn and form
knowledge about their immediate world. Some communities, with strong oral traditions will
have a different way of learning as compared to communities where written traditions
and
modern technology are dominant.
Local Resources- There is a rich wealth of available human and material resources that the
school can utilize to promote learning. In fact, studies have shown that utilization of
local
resources contributed significantly to learning because of the learner‘s familiarity with
and
closer identification to the resources. Learners will also appreciate the importance of the
available resources within the community for learning.
Local Language- Language is a powerful tool for learning. It covers both the oral and
written tradition for expression and communication of ideas. The use of local language
for
describing and interpreting learners‘ experiences contributes significantly to the development
of the learners‘ thinking processes. The use of mother tongue provides the learners the
opportunity to express and communicate in the language that they are most familiar with.
Multi-lingual Education is an essential foundation in the localization of the curriculum.
Page 12
The Region shall develop and implement a program for the localization of the
curriculum including MTB-MLE aligned to the same content and performance standards of
the national basic education curriculum. Specifically, it shall:
Understanding of the local learning systems and how they can be utilized to make the
national curriculum more culturally sensitive will not only promote increased learning but at
the same time develop in the learners, appreciation and pride of their communities‘ culture
and identity. Moreover, a strong identification with the community will help develop in the
learners‘ serious commitment to help develop their own communities.
The implication to teachers is that, the curriculum will require teachers to apply local
knowledge and to become more culturally authentic in the way they conduct the
teaching-
learning process. There is a need therefore to train teachers and other education personnel for
this task. The training of education personnel on localization of curriculum project is
envisioned to:
Page 13
become culturally responsive individuals with great sense of pride to one‘s local cultural
heritage.
The LRMDS also comprises a web based catalogue and online repository of learning,
teaching and professional development resources. It functions as a clearinghouse. That is, the
LRMDS provides information about the location of resources (hardcopy and softcopy)
and
allows users of the system to access directly digitized versions of resources that are published
and stored within the LRMDS repository. It is also a quality assurance system providing
support to DepED Regions, Divisions and Schools in the selection and acquisition of quality
digital and non-digital resources in response to identified local educational needs.
The LRMDS is managed by a core team composed of personnel from the Curriculum
and Learning Management Division. These personnel were capacitated to perform the tasks
required by this newly-established system. In addition, experts from different divisions were
likewise capacitated and considered as on-call members of the team.
To house the system, the Learning Resources Management and Development Center
(LRMDC) was constructed. Along with this, appropriate equipment, software and pieces of
furniture were acquired to make it fully functional. All activities related to the development
and productions of resources are lodged in this office. Moreover, CLMD has efficient and
competent staffs who are all ICT literate who can serve as additional LRMDS members given
the adequate capability building activities.
D. Technical Assistance-
Issues and concerns abound in almost every aspect of the Philippine Education
specifically on curriculum and instruction and implementation process of various educational
programs and projects. Hence, provision of technical assistance to schools divisions is crucial
in improving their performance. Indeed, the Curriculum and Learning Management Division
is taking bold steps in support of the organization‘s vision and mission, thus encouraging
everyone to work geared towards the attainment of the common goal.
Page 14
The identified strengths of the CLMD in the provision of technical assistance are
delivered in varied forms such as information sharing, group and work management and
capability building. The activities are done through the following:
stakeholders networking and mobilization;
development of standards and indicators of progress, impact and processes;
supervision by monitoring and evaluation of regional standards in learning outcomes;
and
technical assistance through trainings/capability buildings (Preschool/Kindergarten
Curriculum, MTB-MLE, Madrasah Education, Journalism, ALS, SPED, etc.),
performance evaluation, orientation cum advocacy, focused group discussion,
workshops, conferences and onsite coaching.
Inevitably, problems may crop up along the way on the implementation of the
localized curriculum. It is in this context that research as a support to the system, purports to
find out how well the components work and to generate valid data through the use of
the
different M & E tools, which have been developed by the CLMD curriculum managers and
implementers.
Proponents of this research on curriculum and instruction are guided by the standards
of a functional research such as the following:
needs-based;
timeliness;
relevance;
reliability;
validity.
Page 15
There are specific tools and templates crafted such as M & E Tool for Curriculum
Programs and Projects Plan, Advocacy, Technical Assistance for Schools Division
Implementation of the Curriculum Programs in the Instructional Supervision and Leadership,
for Learning Resource Development and Localization and tool for Actual Implementation at
the School Level.
LEVEL
Regional Level Division Level School Level
Functionally literate Functionally literate Functionally literate
Outcome
learners imbued with learners imbued with learners imbued with
pride and commitment pride and commitment to pride and commitment
to one‘s cultural one‘s cultural heritage to one‘s cultural
heritage heritage
Critical
Processes Regional Level Division Level School Level
A. Program
Regularly School wide active
Implementation:
Regularly
reviewed/Adjusted reviewed/adjusted implementation of the
Regional Policy Regional Program Division Program articulated localized
and Standard Framework and Implementation and curriculum with
Setting regional standards Advocacy Plan for corresponding local
Strategic Planning aligned to national Division-wide assessment tools
Advocacy policies and standards curriculum programs
Strategic implementation Effective instructional
Pilot
implementation of Implementation Plans leadership and
teaching-learning with physical/ financial supervision of SH and
Effective instructional
models Plans for Master Teachers
leadership and
Region-wide Programs/projects with
supervision of
Implementation of corresponding MOVs
EPS/PSDS
the Curriculum
Region wide and
Assessment for, participatory advocacy/
as, and of learning dissemination at all
levels and active private
and public partnership
Implementation
Standards for
Instructional
Leadership and
Supervision
Assessment standards
and localized tools
Page 16
B. Curriculum Effective advocacy on Effective advocacy on Relevant adaptation/
Localization: the curriculum the curriculum enrichment and
localization localization validation of the School
Relevant & continuous Curriculum
Development
Relevant adaptation/ Localization Matrix
and Advocacy of enrichment of the
the Regional Regional Curriculum enrichment and (SCLM) infusing local
Framework for CL Localization Matrix validation of the content and learning
Community (RCLM) Division Curriculum processes into the
Mapping of the
Effective management Localization Matrix DCLM and national
Local Learning of the integration of the DCLM infusing local BEC
Systems (LLS) RCLM into the national content and learning
School wide active
Integration of BEC by learning area processes into the RCLM
LLS into the BEC specialists implementation of the
Utilization of articulated localized
Localized curriculum Systematic
Curriculum in community mapping of
Teaching learning relevant local resources
process
Page 17
localization , from internal and implementation
LRMD, TA and external stakeholders
Research
To ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of the basic education curriculum program,
monitoring and evaluation will be done through systematic data gathering, analysis and
utilization of information during the implementation of the curriculum program including the
special programs and projects and the localization process . The targets/activities set during
the planning workshops will be monitored as the work progresses. Information will be used
for evaluation and to determine whether the resources are sufficient and are judiciously used,
whether the capacity of the region is sufficient and appropriate, and whether the managers
and implementers are doing what they planned to do.
The Evaluation and Monitoring Team will do the following about the implementation
of all the components and critical processes:
Provide regular feedback on the extent to which the activities are achieving the
goals of the program, keeping track of progress and adjusting operations.
Monitor the efficiency with which the different phases/activities and resources
of the program are being implemented/used and suggest improvements.
Evaluate the extent to which the program is able to achieve its general and
specific objectives.
Page 18
A general M&E Framework is charted below and will become the basis for tools
development during the preparatory phase of the program implementation. Some tools have
been initially developed and can be found in the last section of this document.
What will be How will it be monitored M&E Tools Who will When will How will
monitored monitor the the results
monitoring be used?
be
A. Program Implementation
Regional Field compliance thru the Compliance RFTAT Quarterly Planning
Policy and RFTAT tools Adjustment
Standard and TA
Setting purposes
Strategic Process monitoring and Tracking Region/ Quarterly Planning
Planning evaluation of output tool, Division RMEA Adjustment
M&E Tool CLMD and
for the PPRD Technical
requirements QAAD Assistance
for strategic
planning
Review
inventory
Advocacy Interview, feedback, end of Interview, Core Team of Quarterly Input to
program evaluation, TA FGD, curriculum Program
and M&E mechanism checklist, PAPs sustainabilit
survey, y
questionnaire
s
Pilot RO will oversee the pilot FGD Guide RO Core team Monthly/QuaFor Policy
implementatiimplementation of T-L for curriculum rterly Recommenda
on of models through FGD with Programs and tion
Teaching-DO Core Team on Projects
Learning Programs and Projects
Models DO instructional leaders Interview DO Core Team Weekly/ To review
will supervise the pilot Guide for curriculum Monthly and enhance
implementation through Programs and the T-L
Interview and Actual Projects As the need models
Classroom Observation arises
As bases for
research
SHs will observe the pilot TLOC SHs Weekly/ Teacher
implementation through: Daily Training (to
Actual Classroom improve
Observation teacher
competence
) Strategy
Developme
nt
Region-wide RO will oversee and Localized RO Core team Monthly/ For Policy
actual evaluate the Interview for curriculum Quarterly Recommend
implementatiutilization/implementation/iguide Programs and ation
on of the ntegration of the Localized Projects
Curriculum Curriculum in the BEC
and special
Programs and
projects
DO instructional leaders Interview DO Core Team Weekly/ To review
will supervise the pilot Guide for curriculum Monthly and enhance
Page 19
implementation and Programs and the T-L
integration of LC in the Projects models
BEC through Interview
and Actual Classroom As bases for
Observation research
SHs will observe the pilot TLOC SHs Weekly/ For
implementation and Daily Training
integration of LC in the
BEC through Actual For
Classroom Observation Professional
Developme
nt
Assessment All RO EPS and Program -Checklist CLMD Quarterly Constructio
as, of, and for Coordinators will monitor -Supervisory n of leveled
learning : the teaching -learning Plan tools and
process through the use of -Process IMs that
the mechanism and tools monitoring would
and enhance
evaluation skills of
output students
under the
following
categories:
-struggling
-developing
-
progressing
All Instructional -TLOC Curriculum Thrice a To input
Supervisors/ Leaders will -Checklist Implementers week into
Monitor/observe the -Supervisory teachers‘
teaching-learning process Plan performanc
through the use of the DO e
mechanism and tools improveme
nt
SHs directly monitor the TLOC SHs Weekly/ To input
teaching-learning process Daily into
teachers‘
performanc
e
improveme
nt
B. Curriculum Localization
Development All RO personnel and Evaluation CLMD, QAAD During and To
and advocacy selected DO personnel will Tool for after adjust/impr
of the evaluate the CL Framework CLF; Finalization ove the CL
Regional Checklist of CL Framework
Framework Review of the advocacy based on the CLMD Framework
for documents submitted by the CLF; To
curriculum DOs Interviews, Before, strengthen/
localization Survey, during and sustain the
QuestionnaireRFTAT after CLF
s, Feedback advocacy Advocacy
Forms; activities
Document
Resources
Inventory
Community All RO and DO supervisors FG CLMD Team During and To improve/
Mapping and and selected local experts Assessment after refine the
Development will validate the LLS Tool finalization LLS Matrix
of LLS Matrix of LLS
Page 20
Matrix Matrix
Focus group Assessment
for various groups:
-RO, -DO, Stakeholders, -
Teachers, Specialists
Integration of RO: Validate Division RO Crafted CLMD, QAAD Quarterly To enhance
local learning Reports M & E Tool instruction
system into
the BEC DO: Check the integration RO & DO EPS and PSDS To replicate
point/scheme re: localized crafted M & good
learning and BEC E Tools practices
C. LRMDS
DevelopAssess/evaluate existing LRMDS A & E LRMDS A & E As the need To align
ment, school developed Tools Team arises LRs with
Assessmelocalized LRs LRMDS D & P During and BEC
nt and Assure quality of and QA Teams after the To assure
Evaluatiodeveloped localized LRs Development quality
n t of of LR localized
Localized LRs
Resource
s
D. Technical Assistance
TA/CB Use of T&D standards F3 M&E Tools and RFTAT for Quarterly Planning of
and M&E mechanism TA Tools; region; CB
for F3 activities and TA Job Embedded Division Activities,
JEL Advising Learning advising Monitoring TA and
tools Team for Adjustment
division s
E. Research
Research All EPS and Program CLMD Yearly Teachers
Survey
Coordinators should do questionnaire Developme
the following: nt
Documentary Review of
FGD
analysis Curriculum
Monitoring Implement
Journal
mechanism and tools ation
assessing action Decision/
Bulletin
research Policy
Making
Improve
teachers
developme
nt
Page 21
VII. ADVOCACY AND LINKAGES
special programs and projects including the localization efforts for the program. Hence,
advocacy efforts will be focused on ensuring that all the region‘s functional divisions, schools
divisions and stakeholders at the school level know the importance and benefits that can be
derived from the operations of the curriculum and management system through proper
implementation of the critical processes and adherence to the national and local curriculum
The following are some practical strategies that will be done to strengthen advocacy
Organization of local groups, opportunities and avenues where the region, division
and school level may express and exchange insights on varied common resources
the people.
Linkages with academic institutions, e.g. TEIs and other educational institutions,
learning processes
Publication in website
Page 22
M &E Tools
EVALUATION CHECKLIST
(This checklist can be used to assure that the planning for all or any curriculum program/project
implementation adheres to standards and appropriate use of the template for this specific critical process.
Also see accompanying Templates 1a and 1b.)
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT:
DATE EVALUATED:
Directions: Examine carefully the given indicators. Put a check mark in the appropriate
column. Write your remarks or comments if necessary.
I. PLANNING
1.3.1 specific
1.3.2 measurable
1.3.3 attainable
1.3.4 results-oriented
1.3.5 time-bound
1.4 Are the activities responsive to the
identified goal?
1.5 Are the strategies doable?
1.6 Is there collaboration among
stakeholders in the preparation of
the plan?
1.7 Is the allocated budget sufficient?
II. ADVOCACY
Page 23
1.1 Are the advocacy goals aligned to
the Program/Project goals?
1.2 Are the advocacy objectives:
1.3.1 specific
1.3.2 measurable
1.3.3 attainable
1.3.4 result-oriented
1.3.5 time-bound
newsletter, brochure,
press releases,
advertisement)
Page 24
CLM Form 1a: PLANNING TEMPLATE FOR
Name Of Program/Project:
Type Of Program/Project:
Project/Program Background/Description
Goal 1:
Objectives: 1.1
1.2
1.3
Goal 2:
Objectives: 2.1
2.2
2.3
Goal 3:
Objectives: 3.1
3.2
3.3
Program Duration:
Target Beneficiary:
Supporting Agencies:
Funding Source:
Budget Requirement:
Success Indicators:
Page 25
PROGRAM/PROJECT ACTION PLAN
Page 26
CLM Form 1b: ADVOCACY TEMPLATE FOR
Name Of Program/Project:
Type Of Program/Project:
Advocacy
Goal 1:
Objectives: 1.1
1.2
1.3
Advocacy
Goal 1:
Objectives: 2.1
2.2
2.3
Advocacy
Goal 1:
Objectives: 3.1
3.2
3.3
Advocacy Timeframe:
Target Audience:
M&E:
Page 27
PROGRAM/PROJECT ADVOCACY ACTION PLAN
Programs/Projects
Description: This tool is to be used by the regional personnel conducting Monitoring and
Evaluation of the different curriculum programs and projects implemented by the schools
divisions. The key informants for the completion of this tool are the division focal persons or
coordinators of the curriculum program or project monitored.
Directions: Please respond to the tool by ticking the appropriate box that corresponds to your
observation and available documentary evidences.
For Parts I & II, use this scale:
Never - not done at all
Occasionally - done once a month
Often - done at least twice a month
A. Division Profile
Division: __________________________________________________________________
Program/Project Implemented: _________________________________________________
Focal Person(s):______________________________________________________________
No. of District/School Implementers: ____________________________________________
Start of Implementation: ______________________________________________________
Sponsor, if any: ______________________________________________________________
Cost of Implementation: ______________________________________________________
I. Instructional Leadership
Page 29
8. Develops a culture of functional literacy
through the curriculum program/project
implemented
a.
b.
b.
c.
b.
Page 30
B. Localization Yes No Remarks
b.
b.
a.
b.
b.
b. c. d.
28. Were the CB programs focused?
If yes, indicate the bases:
a.
b.
a.
b.
b.
a.
b.
Page 31
32. Has there been marked improvement in the
division performance as a result of the program
implementation?
If yes, indicate the marked improvement:
a.
b.
_____RO
_____DO a. b.
_____School a. b.
Others: Specify_____________________ e. f.
Page 32
local materials were maximally utilized in the
teaching – learning process?
M&E Personnel:
Region: Division:
Monitored by:
Region: Division:
Division: _______________________________________________________________
School: ________________________________ District: ________________________
School Head: ___________________________ PSDS: __________________________
Curriculum Program/Project Implemented: ____________________
Description: This tool is designed to monitor compliance and adherence to the critical
processes in curriculum program/project implementation done by the school. The M & E
focal persons of the core team for program/project implementation together with the external
M & E team at the division level will respond to this tool. Documentary evidences such as
SIP/AIP, TSNA, IPPD, SPPD, TDNASH, IS Tools and reports, JEL contracts and SBM
levels of practice must form parts/bases for the evaluation.
Directions: Please respond to the tool by ticking the appropriate blanks that correspond to
your observation and available documentary evidences.
A. Planning
Page 34
3. Which advocacy materials are available and used for the curriculum program/project?
Please check whichever is available:
____streamers/tarps
____flyers
____ multimedia
____ airtime
____ others, please specify _______________________________.
Page 35
D. Learning Resources
1. Does the school maintain a log of uploaded and downloaded LR‘s which were
developed and utilized in line with the curriculum program/project and in adherence
to the national standards?
_____Yes ____No
_____Yes ____No
2. Does the school maintain a monthly IS/mentoring report utilizing data from the
following tools?
a. Instructional Supervisory (CB Past) tool?
____Yes ____No
b. TLOC?
____Yes ____No
3. Does the school maintain an updated profile of teachers‘ performance based on the
NCBTS indicators for the last three (3) years?
_____Yes ____No
4. Are the following assessment tools available and utilized in the classrooms?
____Yes ____No
Page 36
c. Product Oriented Performance Based Tests
____Yes ____No
_____Yes ____No
_____________________________________END _______________________________________
M&E Personnel:
Division: School:
Monitored by:
Name of Teacher/Personnel Teaching/Work Loads Required KSA’s specific to Required CB Activities based
Check if attended related
involved in the (subjects taught in the program/project on the data from the training and specify the
date
implementation of the adherence to the curricular implemented in adherence expanded TSNA, re: D3,
D4, of attendance. If no, mark X
program/project standards of the to the curricular standards) D5 (See Training Passbook,
program/project) IPPD and SPPD)
Ex. John Narzo Music and Arts Pedagogical content Principles of Art _____Yes _____No
knowledge (PCK) on Date of Training:
Elements of Art ___________
Page 38
CLM 5: M & E TOOL for LOCALIZATION OF LEARNING
RESOURCES
Description: This tool is to be used by the Regional CLMD personnel in Monitoring and
Evaluation of the development of localized learning resources by the schools divisions to
ensure that the LRs are culturally-responsive and relevant in the local context. The key
informant concerned for the completion of this tool is the division focal person or
coordinator.
Division: __________________________________________________________________
Remarks/
Page 39
Beta version: Are revisions based on the results of the
Part II. Qualities of the Localized Learning Resource and Teaching Resource developed
Page 40
Local resources Do the localized LRs facilitate
learning through inclusion of local
human and material resources?
Do the localized LRs adhere to LRMDS Standards, Specs (Note: Items are adapted from
and Guidelines related to the following: LRMDS standards)
LRs/TRs/PDMs able to be
identified?
local (community/geographic)
conditions
Page 41
Resource does not confront or
embarrass learners in any or all
of the following ways:
- require learner to expose
personal data which may
embarrass them
- unfavorably or stereotypically
compare family or community
characteristics with learners‘
identity
- unnecessarily or
indiscriminately confront
cultural beliefs or practices
Society
Depict contributions of men and
women, ethnic and cultural
groups in economic and social
progress.
Page 42
M&E Personnel:
Region: Division:
Monitored by:
Reference:
STRIVE Regions VI, VII and VII
Page 43