1.

Choose a real case of an international contract concluded between Mexico and another
country in which a trade dispute takes place.
2. Find and analyze the ICC mechanism for dispute resolution: the name of the organization
that executes it and the procedure followed
3. Present a result according to any of thebasic rules of the ICC you have observed in your
analysis

Cases:

Year: 2008

Claimant Mexico

Respondent United States

On December 17, 2008, Mexico requested consultations with the United States regarding the
mandatory country of origin labeling provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 ("1946 Act"),

as amended by the Agriculture, Rural Security, and Investment Act of 2002 ("ARSI Act of 2002") and the
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 ("FCE Act of 2008"), and implemented by regulations
promulgated at 7 C.F.R. Parts 60 and 65.

Dispute Resolution in International Trade

According to Mexico, certain products have been determined to deviate from the
standard international labeling of the country of origin, a situation that cannot be
justified as necessary to comply with a legitimate objective. Mexico argues that the
mandatory

The COOL provisions appear to be inconsistent with U.S. obligations under WTO
agreements, including the following provisions

- Articles 3, 9, and 10 of the GATT 1994;

- Article 2 of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT); or Articles 2,
5, and 7 of the SPS.
Articles 2, 5, and 7 of the SPS Agreement; Y
- Article 2 of the Agreement on Rules of Origin.
These violations appear to have nullified or lessened the benefits of these
agreements for Mexico.
benefits of the Agreements. These violations also appear to have nullified or
impaired the benefits of these agreements to Mexico within the meaning of Article
I:1.
Mexico within the meaning of Article 23(1)(b) of the GATT 1994.

Solution:

When such issues arise between two countries and a commercial dispute arises, the
ICC Arbitration Tribunal will take action against these actions. Arbitration itself is
a very flexible procedure for resolving commercial disputes in a workable manner.
In this case
The nationality of the product being introduced into Mexico must be that of
Mexico. United States.
After contacting the Court of Arbitration, the parties are free to agree to either Free
to decide where to settle this dispute, since the Court always guarantees
confidentiality and, in any case, according to the rules of the International Court of
Arbitration. After the implementation of the following
a thorough analysis of the entire dispute, the final decision will be made by an
"arbitrator" or "tribunal", usually through a mutually agreed appointment process.
the parties.
It is worth mentioning that there are more ways to reach an agreement in case of
negotiation and arbitration if a dispute exists between two
Conclusion:

The factors presented in these debates are very important because they will help us.
Thanks to the topics and research available on the internet, we can see that there
are many ways to reach consensus on these types of issues. There are many ways
to reach a consensus on these types of issues. We must remember that it is also
very important for the country of Mexico to have a good relationship with the rest
of the world because it depends on what we do to other countries.
Fuentes
“Solución De Controversias.”, www.siicex.gob.mx/portalSiicex/SICETECA/Acuerdos/Pagina
%20principal/SOLUCION%20DE%20CONTROVERSIAS.pdf.